222
CHAPTER 6 RESULTS: SURVEY DESIGN AND EFFICIENCY
6.1 Comparative Analyses
This chapter presents comparative results of the different data types collected and of analyses designed to examine survey efficiency. Information on time spent at each field activity is presented. The purpose of the chapter is to examine the comparative efficiency or suitability of different methods used. These include the stratification, patch or plot sampling, qualitative or quantitative data, and tree species data as opposed to other synusiae or bryophytes. On the basis of these results Chapter 7 will assess justification of decisions made on methods in Chapter 4.
6.1.1 Qualitative versus quantitative data
A simplified classification of binary data for the 231 sites is presented in Fig. 12. Fig. 13 shows the correlations of site occurrences between groups in the quantitative and binary classifications. The site numbers for each group are listed in
Appendix 8. The overall structure of the dendrogram is very similar to the quantitative one, with the major division separating high and low altitude sites.
The largest difference between the two classifications is that the intermediate altitude subgroup of community-types 3 and 4, which in the quantitative classification was part of the high altitude group, has fused in the binary one with the low altitude sites. This fusion is however at a fairly high level as 22.3