Rainforest Gully
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Wednesday Walk — Monga Forest Drive — 28 February 2018
Wednesday Walk — Monga Forest Drive — 28 February 2018 Monga National Park, Dasyurus and Waratah Roads and Penance Grove Circuit and Boardwalk Wednesday Walkers have been visiting Monga National Park for over 15 years since the establishment of the Park in 2001, as a result of the regional forests agreement. It still contains patches of old growth forest dominated by brown barrel, E. fastigata, messmate, E. obliqua, and manna gum, E. viminalis, as well as the ancient plumwood, Eucryphia moorei (Cunoniaceae, coachwoods), that is confined to wet gullies. Other parts of the park are regenerating from past logging that fed a timber mill at Monga. Access to the eastern part of the park on the escarpment is via the Corn Trail that is one of our favourite walks, because of its floriferous heathland understory. Further west a network of old logging trails dissect the park around the catchment of the Mongarlowe River. Our regular haunts here are the Dasyurus Road and picnic ground that leads to the Corn Trail Link across the river, the Waratah Road and Picnic Area, where a riverside track has been constructed to view the waratahs, and the Penance Grove loop track that provides a different access to the boardwalk through groves of massive tree ferns and a plumwood gully. Our first stop was the Dasyurus picnic ground for morning tea and a walk along the roadside. With each visit, the trees are getting taller and some must be getting to the 50m mark. I should borrow a clinometer to measure their true height. Three species dominate: messmate, E. -
GENOME EVOLUTION in MONOCOTS a Dissertation
GENOME EVOLUTION IN MONOCOTS A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School At the University of Missouri In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy By Kate L. Hertweck Dr. J. Chris Pires, Dissertation Advisor JULY 2011 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the dissertation entitled GENOME EVOLUTION IN MONOCOTS Presented by Kate L. Hertweck A candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy And hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. Dr. J. Chris Pires Dr. Lori Eggert Dr. Candace Galen Dr. Rose‐Marie Muzika ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am indebted to many people for their assistance during the course of my graduate education. I would not have derived such a keen understanding of the learning process without the tutelage of Dr. Sandi Abell. Members of the Pires lab provided prolific support in improving lab techniques, computational analysis, greenhouse maintenance, and writing support. Team Monocot, including Dr. Mike Kinney, Dr. Roxi Steele, and Erica Wheeler were particularly helpful, but other lab members working on Brassicaceae (Dr. Zhiyong Xiong, Dr. Maqsood Rehman, Pat Edger, Tatiana Arias, Dustin Mayfield) all provided vital support as well. I am also grateful for the support of a high school student, Cady Anderson, and an undergraduate, Tori Docktor, for their assistance in laboratory procedures. Many people, scientist and otherwise, helped with field collections: Dr. Travis Columbus, Hester Bell, Doug and Judy McGoon, Julie Ketner, Katy Klymus, and William Alexander. Many thanks to Barb Sonderman for taking care of my greenhouse collection of many odd plants brought back from the field. -
Helmholtzia Acorifolia F.Muell
Australian Tropical Rainforest Plants - Online edition Helmholtzia acorifolia F.Muell. Family: Philydraceae Mueller, F.J.H. von (1865) Fragmenta Phytographiae Australiae 5: 203. Type: Queensland, Rockingham Bay, 1866, J. Dallachy s.n.; lecto: MEL; iso: B, K, M. Fide U. Hamann, Willdenowia Beiheft 4: 155 (1966). Common name: Puckerum; Helmholtzia; Kuranda Stem Stem or rhizome +/- horizontal or slightly ascending but the leaves +/- erect and reaching to a height of 1-2 m. Leaves Leaves arranged in one plane and held like a hand fan. Leaf blades glabrous, sword-like, up to 100- 200 x 4 cm, venation longitudinal and parallel. Leaf blade constricted on one side about 1/4 of the way up from the base to form a 'petiole'. Reticulate veins sinuous, +/- at right angles to the midrib. Flowers Inflorescence up to 30 cm long, bracteoles lanceolate up to 12 mm long. Individual flowers sessile, Flowers. © Barry Jago outer tepals lanceolate, about 8-14 mm long, hairy on the outer surface, inner tepals about 3 mm long. Stamens about 4 mm long, anthers bright yellow, locules about 2 mm long +/- clasping the style. Ovary about 2 mm long, densely hairy on the outer surface. Ovules numerous in each locule. Style about 5 mm long. Fruit Fruit globose, about 5-10 mm diam., 3-lobed, +/- translucent. Seeds about 2 mm long, dark reddish- brown. Seedlings First pair of leaves linear, about 4-10 x 0.5-1 mm, apex acute, base sheathing the stem, glabrous, venation longitudinal and parallel, petiole absent. At the tenth leaf stage: leaf blade produced in one Leaves and Flowers. -
Eidothea Hardeniana (Nightcap Oak) September 2004 © Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW), July 2004
Approved NSW & National Recovery Plan Eidothea hardeniana (Nightcap Oak) September 2004 © Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW), July 2004. This work is copyright. However, material presented in this plan may be copied for personal use or published for educational purposes, providing that any extracts are fully acknowledged. Apart from this and any other use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced without prior written permission from NSW Department of Environment and Conservation. NSW Department of Environment and Conservation 43 Bridge Street (PO Box 1967) Hurstville NSW 2220 Tel: 02 9585 6444 www.nationalparks.nsw.gov.au Requests for information or comments regarding the recovery program for the Nightcap Oak are best directed to: The Nightcap Oak Recovery Co-ordinator Threatened Species Unit, North East Branch NSW Department of Environment and Conservation Locked Bag 914 Coffs Harbour NSW 2450 Tel: 02 6651 5946 Cover illustrator: Lesley Elkan © Botanic Gardens Trust, Sydney Cover illustration: Adult and juvenile leaves and fruit of Eidothea hardeniana This plan should be cited as follows: NSW Department of Environment and Conservation 2004, Recovery Plan for the Nightcap Oak (Eidothea hardeniana), Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW), Hurstville. ISBN 0 7313 6781 2 Recovery Plan The Nightcap Oak Draft Recovery Plan The Tumut Grevillea Recovery Plan for the Nightcap Oak (Eidothea hardeniana) Foreword The New South Wales Government established a new environment agency on 24 September 2003, the Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW), which incorporates the New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service. Responsibility for the preparation of Recovery Plans now rests with this new department. -
The Evolutionary and Biogeographic Origin and Diversification of the Tropical Monocot Order Zingiberales
Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 22 | Issue 1 Article 49 2006 The volutE ionary and Biogeographic Origin and Diversification of the Tropical Monocot Order Zingiberales W. John Kress Smithsonian Institution Chelsea D. Specht Smithsonian Institution; University of California, Berkeley Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Kress, W. John and Specht, Chelsea D. (2006) "The vE olutionary and Biogeographic Origin and Diversification of the Tropical Monocot Order Zingiberales," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 22: Iss. 1, Article 49. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol22/iss1/49 Zingiberales MONOCOTS Comparative Biology and Evolution Excluding Poales Aliso 22, pp. 621-632 © 2006, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden THE EVOLUTIONARY AND BIOGEOGRAPHIC ORIGIN AND DIVERSIFICATION OF THE TROPICAL MONOCOT ORDER ZINGIBERALES W. JOHN KRESS 1 AND CHELSEA D. SPECHT2 Department of Botany, MRC-166, United States National Herbarium, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, PO Box 37012, Washington, D.C. 20013-7012, USA 1Corresponding author ([email protected]) ABSTRACT Zingiberales are a primarily tropical lineage of monocots. The current pantropical distribution of the order suggests an historical Gondwanan distribution, however the evolutionary history of the group has never been analyzed in a temporal context to test if the order is old enough to attribute its current distribution to vicariance mediated by the break-up of the supercontinent. Based on a phylogeny derived from morphological and molecular characters, we develop a hypothesis for the spatial and temporal evolution of Zingiberales using Dispersal-Vicariance Analysis (DIVA) combined with a local molecular clock technique that enables the simultaneous analysis of multiple gene loci with multiple calibration points. -
Biodiversity Summary: Port Phillip and Westernport, Victoria
Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations. -
Peach Myrtle)
Approved NSW & National Recovery Plan Uromyrtus australis (Peach Myrtle) August 2005 © Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW), 2005. This work is copyright. However, material presented in this plan may be copied for personal use or published for educational purposes, providing that any extracts are fully acknowledged. Apart from this and any other use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced without prior written permission from the Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW). Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW) 59-61 Goulbourn Street (PO Box A290) Sydney South NSW 1232 Phone: (02) 9995 5000 (switchboard) Phone: 131 555 (information & publications requests) TTY: (02) 9211 4723 Fax: (02) 9995 5999 Email: [email protected] Website: www.environment.nsw.gov.au Requests for information or comments regarding the recovery program for the Peach Myrtle (Uromyrtus australis) are best directed to: The Uromyrtus australis Recovery Co-ordinator Threatened Species Unit, North East Branch Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW) Locked Bag 914 Coffs Harbour NSW 2450 Phone: 02 6651 5946 Cover illustrator: Adam Gill This plan should be cited as follows: Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW) 2005, Approved Recovery Plan for the Peach Myrtle (Uromyrtus australis), Department of Environment and Conservation(NSW), Sydney. ISBN 1 74137 387 5 August 2005 DEC 2005/238 Printed on recycled paper Approved Recovery Plan Uromyrtus australis Recovery Plan for the Peach Myrtle (Uromyrtus australis) Foreword The New South Wales Government established a new environment agency on 24 September 2003, the Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC), which incorporates the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service. -
Overview of Plot-Based Vegetation Classification Approaches Within
Australian Journal of Botany © The Authors 2021 https://doi.org/10.1071/BT20072 Supplementary material An alternative broad vegetation hierarchy for eastern New South Wales, with application for environmental planning and management Nicholas J. H. GellieA,C and John T. HunterB APrincipal Fire and Vegetation Scientist, at Ecofuego, 53 Pioneer Road, Stanley, Vic. 3747, Australia. BSchool of Environmental and Rural Science, Elm Avenue, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia. Email: [email protected] CCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Appendix S1 Table S1. List of macrogroups (L.5 IVC) derived from vegetation formation groups (VFGs) The rows shaded in grey in the table indicate the new macrogroups added in this study to the original list of those found in western NSW (unshaded rows) – Benson et al. (2006) Numeric code Division (L.4 IVC) Abbreviation Macrogroups (L.5 IVC) New Eastern NSW groups 1 Alpine Complex ABF Alpine Bogs and Fens 0 1 2 Alpine Complex AF Alpine Fjaeldmarks 0 1 3 Alpine Complex AHG Alpine Herbfields 0 1 4 Alpine Complex AHS Alpine Woodlands, Heaths, and Shrublands 0 1 5 Bare land BLG Bare Land: Gravels–Alluvium–Sand–Soil 0 1 6 Bare land BLB Bare Land: Beach Sand 1 1 7 Bare land BLR Bare Land: Rock 1 1 8 Eucalypt Forest ECT Eucalyptus Mesic Forests of the Eastern Tablelands 0 1 9 Eucalypt Forest EIFC Eucalyptus Ironbark Forests of the East Coast and Tablelands 0 1 10 Eucalypt Forest EFLMSC Eucalyptus (Grassy or Shrubby) Forests on Low-Moderate Fertility Soils on the East Coast 0 1 11 -
Newsletter 27
Richmond Birdwing Conservation Network Newsletter No 27. September 2013 ISSN 1833-8674 Richmond Birdwing Conservation Network | Newsletter No 27, 2013 | Richmond Birdwing Conservation Network The Richmond Birdwing Conservation Network (RBCN) operates under the umbrella of Wildlife Queensland, publisher of this newsletter. RBCN promotes conservation of the Richmond birdwing butterfly Ornithoptera richmondia, its food plant, Pararistolochia spp. and butterfly habitats. Membership of RBCN is open to anyone interested in the Richmond birdwing butterfly or insects of conservation concern. RBCN encourages liaison between community members, catchment and landcare groups and government authorities. RBCN Committee Richard Bull [email protected] Ian Gynther [email protected] Chris Hosking [email protected] Susan Hollindale [email protected] Catherine Madden [email protected] Phil Moran [email protected] Don Sands (Chair) [email protected] Area Representatives Dale Borgelt (Brisbane Region) [email protected] Richard Bull (Gold Coast-Tamborine) [email protected] Keith McCosh (Scenic Rim) [email protected] Phil Moran (Sunshine Coast) [email protected] Why not receive your newsletter by email? If you have access to the internet, please consider receiving your newsletter in colour by email. saving on printing and postage costs. Email [email protected] to let us know your choice. Newsletter: Ewa Meyer Cover image: Pararistolochia praevenosa Photo © Paul Grimshaw Richmond Birdwing -
Weed Risk Assessment for Philydrum Lanuginosum Banks Ex Gaertn
Weed Risk Assessment for Philydrum United States lanuginosum Banks ex Gaertn. Department of (Philydraceae) – Woolly frogs mouth Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service September 27, 2016 Version 1 A population of Philydrum lanuginosum in eastern North Carolina. Top left: Habitat and infestation that surrounds pond. Top right: Habit: Bottom right: Flower. Bottom left: dehisced capsules. Photographs by Anthony Koop. Agency Contact: Plant Epidemiology and Risk Analysis Laboratory Center for Plant Health Science and Technology Plant Protection and Quarantine Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service United States Department of Agriculture 1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 300 Raleigh, NC 27606 Weed Risk Assessment for Philydrum lanuginosum Introduction Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ) regulates noxious weeds under the authority of the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. § 7701-7786, 2000) and the Federal Seed Act (7 U.S.C. § 1581-1610, 1939). A noxious weed is defined as “any plant or plant product that can directly or indirectly injure or cause damage to crops (including nursery stock or plant products), livestock, poultry, or other interests of agriculture, irrigation, navigation, the natural resources of the United States, the public health, or the environment” (7 U.S.C. § 7701-7786, 2000). We use the PPQ weed risk assessment (WRA) process (PPQ, 2015) to evaluate the risk potential of plants, including those newly detected in the United States, those proposed for import, and those emerging as weeds elsewhere in the world. The PPQ WRA process includes three analytical components that together describe the risk profile of a plant species (risk potential, uncertainty, and geographic potential; PPQ, 2015). -
222 Chapter 6 Results
222 CHAPTER 6 RESULTS: SURVEY DESIGN AND EFFICIENCY 6.1 Comparative Analyses This chapter presents comparative results of the different data types collected and of analyses designed to examine survey efficiency. Information on time spent at each field activity is presented. The purpose of the chapter is to examine the comparative efficiency or suitability of different methods used. These include the stratification, patch or plot sampling, qualitative or quantitative data, and tree species data as opposed to other synusiae or bryophytes. On the basis of these results Chapter 7 will assess justification of decisions made on methods in Chapter 4. 6.1.1 Qualitative versus quantitative data A simplified classification of binary data for the 231 sites is presented in Fig. 12. Fig. 13 shows the correlations of site occurrences between groups in the quantitative and binary classifications. The site numbers for each group are listed in Appendix 8. The overall structure of the dendrogram is very similar to the quantitative one, with the major division separating high and low altitude sites. The largest difference between the two classifications is that the intermediate altitude subgroup of community-types 3 and 4, which in the quantitative classification was part of the high altitude group, has fused in the binary one with the low altitude sites. This fusion is however at a fairly high level as 22.3 1 2 1 9a 9b 10 8 6 7 5b 3 4 12b 13 a 15 11 16 Community-type Fig. 12. Einary classification of 231 sites. This dendrogram is simplified for presentation and comparison, by being truncated at the community-type level. -
I Is the Sunda-Sahul Floristic Exchange Ongoing?
Is the Sunda-Sahul floristic exchange ongoing? A study of distributions, functional traits, climate and landscape genomics to investigate the invasion in Australian rainforests By Jia-Yee Samantha Yap Bachelor of Biotechnology Hons. A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2018 Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation i Abstract Australian rainforests are of mixed biogeographical histories, resulting from the collision between Sahul (Australia) and Sunda shelves that led to extensive immigration of rainforest lineages with Sunda ancestry to Australia. Although comprehensive fossil records and molecular phylogenies distinguish between the Sunda and Sahul floristic elements, species distributions, functional traits or landscape dynamics have not been used to distinguish between the two elements in the Australian rainforest flora. The overall aim of this study was to investigate both Sunda and Sahul components in the Australian rainforest flora by (1) exploring their continental-wide distributional patterns and observing how functional characteristics and environmental preferences determine these patterns, (2) investigating continental-wide genomic diversities and distances of multiple species and measuring local species accumulation rates across multiple sites to observe whether past biotic exchange left detectable and consistent patterns in the rainforest flora, (3) coupling genomic data and species distribution models of lineages of known Sunda and Sahul ancestry to examine landscape-level dynamics and habitat preferences to relate to the impact of historical processes. First, the continental distributions of rainforest woody representatives that could be ascribed to Sahul (795 species) and Sunda origins (604 species) and their dispersal and persistence characteristics and key functional characteristics (leaf size, fruit size, wood density and maximum height at maturity) of were compared.