Recovery Planning Action Commenced List (Revised June 2009)
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Phylogenetic Placement of the Enigmatic Orchid Genera Thaia and Tangtsinia: Evidence from Molecular and Morphological Characters
TAXON 61 (1) • February 2012: 45–54 Xiang & al. • Phylogenetic placement of Thaia and Tangtsinia Phylogenetic placement of the enigmatic orchid genera Thaia and Tangtsinia: Evidence from molecular and morphological characters Xiao-Guo Xiang,1 De-Zhu Li,2 Wei-Tao Jin,1 Hai-Lang Zhou,1 Jian-Wu Li3 & Xiao-Hua Jin1 1 Herbarium & State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, P.R. China 2 Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Biogeography, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan 650204, P.R. China 3 Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Menglun Township, Mengla County, Yunnan province 666303, P.R. China Author for correspondence: Xiao-Hua Jin, [email protected] Abstract The phylogenetic position of two enigmatic Asian orchid genera, Thaia and Tangtsinia, were inferred from molecular data and morphological evidence. An analysis of combined plastid data (rbcL + matK + psaB) using Bayesian and parsimony methods revealed that Thaia is a sister group to the higher epidendroids, and tribe Neottieae is polyphyletic unless Thaia is removed. Morphological evidence, such as plicate leaves and corms, the structure of the gynostemium and the micromorphol- ogy of pollinia, also indicates that Thaia should be excluded from Neottieae. Thaieae, a new tribe, is therefore tentatively established. Using Bayesian and parsimony methods, analyses of combined plastid and nuclear datasets (rbcL, matK, psaB, trnL-F, ITS, Xdh) confirmed that the monotypic genus Tangtsinia was nested within and is synonymous with the genus Cepha- lanthera, in which an apical stigma has evolved independently at least twice. -
Habitat Associations and Natural History of the Tasmanian "Snow Skinks" (Niveoscincus Spp.)
Papers and Proceedings ofthe Royal Society ofTasmania, Volume 133(1), 1999 57 HABITAT ASSOCIATIONS AND NATURAL HISTORY OF THE TASMANIAN "SNOW SKINKS" (NIVEOSCINCUS SPP.) by Jane Melville and Roy Swain (with two tables and four text-figures) MELVILLE, J. & SWAIN, R., 1999 (31 :x): Habitat associations and natural history ofthe Tasmanian "snow skinks" (Niveoscincus spp.). Pap. Proc. R. Soc. Tasm. 133(1): 57-64. ISSN 0080-4703. Formerly School ofZoology, University ofTasmania, now Department of Biology, Washington University, Campus Box 1137, St Louis, MO 63130, USA OM); School of Zoology, University of Tasmania, GPO Box 252-5, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia 7001 (RS). Niveoscincus "snow skink" is the largest genus oflizards in Tasmania, but little literature is available on the ecology ofthe seven species discussed here. They were examined by studying the vegetation associations and natural history of all Niveoscincus species except N palfreymani. Most were found to be primarily either ground-dwelling, saxicolous or arboreal, although a few species, such as N microlepidotus, showed a combination ofthese habits. Saxicolous and heath/rock-dwelling species were restricted to more open habitats. Ground-dwelling species, on the other hand, were widespread and found in many different habitats but not in open rocky areas. Arboreal species were found in a wide range offorest habitats from sea-level to the treeline. The species studied were found to have significantly different, although partially overlapping habitat preferences. Key Words: alpine, habitat, lizard, Niveoscincus, Tasmania. INTRODUCTION Brief descriptions of the habitat and distributions of these alpine species are available in Hutchinson et al. (1988, General 1989), Hutchinson & Schwaner (1991) and Hutchinson & Hudson (1998). -
PGR Diversity and Economic Utilization of Orchids
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2019) 8(10): 1865-1887 International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences ISSN: 2319-7706 Volume 8 Number 10 (2019) Journal homepage: http://www.ijcmas.com Original Research Article https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.810.217 PGR Diversity and Economic Utilization of Orchids R. K. Pamarthi, R. Devadas, Raj Kumar, D. Rai, P. Kiran Babu, A. L. Meitei, L. C. De, S. Chakrabarthy, D. Barman and D. R. Singh* ICAR-NRC for Orchids, Pakyong, Sikkim, India ICAR-IARI, Kalimpong, West Bengal, India *Corresponding author ABSTRACT Orchids are one of the highly commercial crops in floriculture sector and are robustly exploited due to the high ornamental and economic value. ICAR-NRC for Orchids Pakyong, Sikkim, India, majorly focused on collection, characterization, K e yw or ds evaluation, conservation and utilization of genetic resources available in the country particularly in north-eastern region and developed a National repository of Orchids, Collection, Conservation, orchids. From 1996 to till date, several exploration programmes carried across the Utilization country and a total of 351 species under 94 genera was collected and conserved at Article Info this institute. Among the collections, 205 species were categorized as threatened species, followed by 90 species having breeding value, 87 species which are used Accepted: in traditional medicine, 77 species having fragrance and 11 species were used in 15 September 2019 traditional dietary. Successful DNA bank of 260 species was constructed for Available Online: 10 October 2019 future utilization in various research works. The collected orchid germplasm which includes native orchids was successfully utilized in breeding programme for development of novel varieties and hybrids. -
Inventory of Taxa for the Fitzgerald River National Park
Flora Survey of the Coastal Catchments and Ranges of the Fitzgerald River National Park 2013 Damien Rathbone Department of Environment and Conservation, South Coast Region, 120 Albany Hwy, Albany, 6330. USE OF THIS REPORT Information used in this report may be copied or reproduced for study, research or educational purposed, subject to inclusion of acknowledgement of the source. DISCLAIMER The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information used. However, the author and participating bodies take no responsibiliy for how this informrion is used subsequently by other and accepts no liability for a third parties use or reliance upon this report. CITATION Rathbone, DA. (2013) Flora Survey of the Coastal Catchments and Ranges of the Fitzgerald River National Park. Unpublished report. Department of Environment and Conservation, Western Australia. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author would like to thank many people that provided valable assistance and input into the project. Sarah Barrett, Anita Barnett, Karen Rusten, Deon Utber, Sarah Comer, Charlotte Mueller, Jason Peters, Roger Cunningham, Chris Rathbone, Carol Ebbett and Janet Newell provided assisstance with fieldwork. Carol Wilkins, Rachel Meissner, Juliet Wege, Barbara Rye, Mike Hislop, Cate Tauss, Rob Davis, Greg Keighery, Nathan McQuoid and Marco Rossetto assissted with plant identification. Coralie Hortin, Karin Baker and many other members of the Albany Wildflower society helped with vouchering of plant specimens. 2 Contents Abstract .............................................................................................................................. -
Seidenfaden Malaysia: 0.65 These Figures Are Surprisingly High, They Apply to Single Only. T
BIOGEOGRAPHY OF MALESIAN ORCHIDACEAE 273 VIII. Biogeographyof Malesian Orchidaceae A. Schuiteman Rijksherbarium/Hortus Botanicus, P.O. Box 9514, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands INTRODUCTION The Orchidaceae outnumber far other in Malesia. At how- by any plant family present, accurate estimate of the of Malesian orchid is difficult to make. ever, an number species Subtracting the numberofestablishedsynonyms from the numberof names attributed to Malesian orchid species results in the staggering figure of 6414 species, with a retention of 0.74. This is ratio (ratio of ‘accepted’ species to heterotypic names) undoubtedly a overestimate, of the 209 Malesian orchid have been revised gross as most genera never their entire from availablerevisions estimate realis- over range. Extrapolating to a more tic retention ratio is problematic due to the small number of modern revisions and the different of treated. If look for Malesian of nature the groups we comparison at species wide ofretention ratios: some recently revised groups, we encounter a range Bulbophylluw sect. Uncifera (Vermeulen, 1993): 0.24 Dendrobium sect. Oxyglossum (Reeve & Woods, 1989): 0.24 Mediocalcar (Schuiteman, 1997): 0.29 Pholidota (De Vogel, 1988): 0.29 Bulbophyllum sect. Pelma (Vermeulen, 1993): 0.50 Paphiopedilum (Cribb, 1987, modified): 0.57 Dendrobium sect. Spatulata (Cribb, 1986, modified): 0.60. Correspondingly, we find a wide rangeof estimates for the ‘real’ numberof known Male- sian orchid species: from 2050 to 5125. Another approach would be to look at a single area, and to compute the retention ratio for the orchid flora of that area. If we do this for Java (mainly based on Comber, 1990), Peninsular Malaysia & Singapore (Seidenfaden & Wood, 1992) and Sumatra (J.J. -
2014 Conservation Outlook Assessment (Archived)
IUCN World Heritage Outlook: https://worldheritageoutlook.iucn.org/ Tasmanian Wilderness - 2014 Conservation Outlook Assessment (archived) IUCN Conservation Outlook Assessment 2014 (archived) Finalised on 07 November 2014 Please note: this is an archived Conservation Outlook Assessment for Tasmanian Wilderness. To access the most up-to-date Conservation Outlook Assessment for this site, please visit https://www.worldheritageoutlook.iucn.org. Tasmanian Wilderness SITE INFORMATION Country: Australia Inscribed in: 1989 Criteria: (iii) (iv) (vi) (vii) (viii) (ix) (x) Site description: In a region that has been subjected to severe glaciation, these parks and reserves, with their steep gorges, covering an area of over 1 million ha, constitute one of the last expanses of temperate rainforest in the world. Remains found in limestone caves attest to the human occupation of the area for more than 20,000 years. © UNESCO IUCN World Heritage Outlook: https://worldheritageoutlook.iucn.org/ Tasmanian Wilderness - 2014 Conservation Outlook Assessment (archived) SUMMARY 2014 Conservation Outlook Good with some concerns Competing land-use claims along the boundaries of the Tasmanian Wilderness has been a contentious issue ever since the inscription of the property in 1982 and its further extension in 1989. The recent boundary extensions of 2010, 2012 and 2013 have contributed to the Outstanding Universal Value of the site and improved the scope for effective management of the property. Despite considerable management efforts, a high number of threats face both the initially inscribed property and areas to which it was extended. The biggest issues arise from inadequate resourcing of scientific research into WH values and monitoring; increasing pressures to allow intrusive commercial tourism which could impact heavily on key sites and WH values; protection and management of areas which have been recently added to the property. -
Great Australian Bight BP Oil Drilling Project
Submission to Senate Inquiry: Great Australian Bight BP Oil Drilling Project: Potential Impacts on Matters of National Environmental Significance within Modelled Oil Spill Impact Areas (Summer and Winter 2A Model Scenarios) Prepared by Dr David Ellis (BSc Hons PhD; Ecologist, Environmental Consultant and Founder at Stepping Stones Ecological Services) March 27, 2016 Table of Contents Table of Contents ..................................................................................................... 2 Executive Summary ................................................................................................ 4 Summer Oil Spill Scenario Key Findings ................................................................. 5 Winter Oil Spill Scenario Key Findings ................................................................... 7 Threatened Species Conservation Status Summary ........................................... 8 International Migratory Bird Agreements ............................................................. 8 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 11 Methods .................................................................................................................... 12 Protected Matters Search Tool Database Search and Criteria for Oil-Spill Model Selection ............................................................................................................. 12 Criteria for Inclusion/Exclusion of Threatened, Migratory and Marine -
Recovery Team Annual Report Threatened Species
RECOVERY TEAM ANNUAL REPORT THREATENED SPECIES AND/OR COMMUNITIES RECOVERY TEAM PROGRAM INFORMATION Recovery Team Albany District Threatened Flora Recovery Team Reporting Period Calendar year 2010 Current membership Member Representing 1. Chair Sarah Comer DEC 2. Exec Officer Sarah Barrett DEC 3. Linda Strahan Albany Wildflower Society 4 Libby Sandiford Albany Wildflower Society 5. John Tucker Ravensthorpe Wildflower Society 6 Margaret Pieroni Community member 7 Merle Bennett Ravensthorpe Wildflower Society 8 Andrew Brown DEC 9 Dave Coates DEC 10 Anne Cochrane DEC 11 Sue Oborne Ongerup Wildflower Society 12 Meredith Spencer DEC 13 Greg Freebury DEC 14 Sylvia Leighton DEC Dates meetings were held 26/5/10; 1/12/10 One to two paragraph Recovery of critically endangered Stirling Range Taxa threatened by Phytophthora summary of achievements dieback has progressed through phosphite application, herbivore (vertebrate and suitable for WATSNU invertebrate) control, concerted efforts to collect seed from remote and ‘difficult’ species and translocations of four species. List of actions undertaken by Recovery Team Action 1 Phosphite application Aerial phosphite was applied to 22 DRF in 38 targets, 340 ha in total. New targets were established for Leucopogon gnaphalioides CR Mondurup, Daviesia ovata CR Manypeaks and Lambertia fairallii, SRNP. Action 2 Herbivore protection Aerial baiting of 25 ha on Bluff Knoll with 1080 oats to protect Banksia montana, Persoonia micranthera, Leucopogon gnaphalioides, Latrobea colophona Caging/ fencing was undertaken for CR taxa Banksia montana, Acacia awestoniana and Daviesia ovata, New monitoring (for grazing impacts) was established for Darwinia collina CR on Bluff Knoll Action 3 Monitoring Fire ecology Fire succession quadrats (22 quadrats) were established for 8 DRF (Verticordia pityhrops, Kunzea similis ssp similis, Adenanthos ellipticus, Ricinocarpus trichophorus, Myoporum cordifolium, Verticordia crebra, Adenanthos dobagii and Eucalyptus nutans) in the Fitzgerald River National Park and fire management guidelines recommended. -
Priority Band Table
Priority band 1 Annual cost of securing all species in band: $338,515. Average cost per species: $4,231 Flora Scientific name Common name Species type Acacia atrox Myall Creek wattle Shrub Acacia constablei Narrabarba wattle Shrub Acacia dangarensis Acacia dangarensis Tree Allocasuarina defungens Dwarf heath casuarina Shrub Asperula asthenes Trailing woodruff Forb Asterolasia buxifolia Asterolasia buxifolia Shrub Astrotricha sp. Wallagaraugh (R.O. Makinson 1228) Tura star-hair Shrub Baeckea kandos Baeckea kandos Shrub Bertya opponens Coolabah bertya Shrub Bertya sp. (Chambigne NR, Bertya sp. (Chambigne NR, M. Fatemi M. Fatemi 24) 24) Shrub Boronia boliviensis Bolivia Hill boronia Shrub Caladenia tessellata Tessellated spider orchid Orchid Calochilus pulchellus Pretty beard orchid Orchid Carex klaphakei Klaphake's sedge Forb Corchorus cunninghamii Native jute Shrub Corynocarpus rupestris subsp. rupestris Glenugie karaka Shrub Cryptocarya foetida Stinking cryptocarya Tree Desmodium acanthocladum Thorny pea Shrub Diuris sp. (Oaklands, D.L. Jones 5380) Oaklands diuris Orchid Diuris sp. aff. chrysantha Byron Bay diuris Orchid Eidothea hardeniana Nightcap oak Tree Eucalyptus boliviana Bolivia stringybark Tree Eucalyptus camphora subsp. relicta Warra broad-leaved sally Tree Eucalyptus canobolensis Silver-leaf candlebark Tree Eucalyptus castrensis Singleton mallee Tree Eucalyptus fracta Broken back ironbark Tree Eucalyptus microcodon Border mallee Tree Eucalyptus oresbia Small-fruited mountain gum Tree Gaultheria viridicarpa subsp. merinoensis Mt Merino waxberry Shrub Genoplesium baueri Bauer's midge orchid Orchid Genoplesium superbum Superb midge orchid Orchid Gentiana wissmannii New England gentian Forb Gossia fragrantissima Sweet myrtle Shrub Grevillea obtusiflora Grevillea obtusiflora Shrub Grevillea renwickiana Nerriga grevillea Shrub Grevillea rhizomatosa Gibraltar grevillea Shrub Hakea pulvinifera Lake Keepit hakea Shrub Hibbertia glabrescens Hibbertia glabrescens Shrub Hibbertia sp. -
The Vegetation of the Fitzgerald River National Park, Western Australia
Kingia1@); 141-153 (1990) 141 The vegetation of the Fitzgerald River National Park, Western Australia T.E.H. Aplint and K.R. Newbey2' I Westem AusrralianHerbarium, Deparrnenr ofConservarion and tjnd Management, P.O. Box 104, C,omo,Wesrem AusEalia 5152 Pres€nr addrcss: 87 Clydatlale Stre€r, Como, Wesrem Australia 6152. '?Cl- Westem Ausralian Herbarium, D€parrment ofconseFarion and Land Managemed, P.O. Box 104. Como. Westem Australia 6152. Abstract Aplin, T.E.H. ad Newbey, KR The vegetaticn of dre Fitzgenld River National Paft, Weslern Austalia- Kingia 1(2): 141-153 (1990). A vegetation map of lhe Fitzgerald River National Part which accompanie,sthis psper shows 12 major plant corrmmities. A kiefaccount ofeadr ofthesedan| corftnmities d,epicledin fiatmap is provided The vegeration fornatims ngefrom woodlard ro heath, with the pedominxrt fomation being lal shflblard. Not€s on t}le physical environment are also includei. Introduction TheFitzgeraldRiverNationalPark(Park) ,of244,677 ba,]nesjn the central sourl coastofWesrem Australia, betwe€ndte towns of Bremer Bay and Hopetounalong the coastand Jenamungupand "C" Ravensthorpeinland (Figure 1). The Park was gazetteda classreserve for tie preservationof "A" flora and faunain 1954,and in 1973was madean classreserve and vestedin the National parks Authority of Westem Australia. It is registeredas an Intemational BiosphereReserve with the United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultuml Organization, the frst to be so approved in WestemAustralia. In 1970 a botanical survey w:ls conductedby the Westem Australian Herbarium !o obtain an assessmentof the botanicalresources in the Park. The vegetationmap which accompaniesthis paper was compiledby Aplin in the courseof that survey. Sincethen Newbey (1979) undertook a study of the vegetationof the central southcoastal region and someof his results havebeen incorporated in this paper. -
Redalyc.ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER?
Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology ISSN: 1409-3871 [email protected] Universidad de Costa Rica Costa Rica BACKHOUSE, GARY N. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology, vol. 7, núm. 1-2, marzo, 2007, pp. 28- 43 Universidad de Costa Rica Cartago, Costa Rica Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=44339813005 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative LANKESTERIANA 7(1-2): 28-43. 2007. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA GARY N. BACKHOUSE Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Division, Department of Sustainability and Environment 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002 Australia [email protected] KEY WORDS:threatened orchids Australia conservation status Introduction Many orchid species are included in this list. This paper examines the listing process for threatened Australia has about 1700 species of orchids, com- orchids in Australia, compares regional and national prising about 1300 named species in about 190 gen- lists of threatened orchids, and provides recommen- era, plus at least 400 undescribed species (Jones dations for improving the process of listing regionally 2006, pers. comm.). About 1400 species (82%) are and nationally threatened orchids. geophytes, almost all deciduous, seasonal species, while 300 species (18%) are evergreen epiphytes Methods and/or lithophytes. At least 95% of this orchid flora is endemic to Australia. -
Two Decades of Demography Reveals That Seed and Seedling Transitions Limit Population Persistence in a Translocated Shrub
Annals of Botany 114: 85–96, 2014 doi:10.1093/aob/mcu082, available online at www.aob.oxfordjournals.org Two decades of demography reveals that seed and seedling transitions limit population persistence in a translocated shrub C. L. Gross* and D. Mackay Ecosystem Management, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia * For correspondence. E-mail [email protected] Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/aob/article-abstract/114/1/85/2768988 by guest on 02 October 2018 Received: 9 December 2013 Returned for revision: 10 March 2014 Accepted: 25 March 2014 Published electronically: 20 May 2014 † Background and Aims Olearia flocktoniae is an endangered shrub that was passively translocated from its natural ecosystem, where it has since gone extinct. This study aimed to determine sensitivities vital to populations persisting in human-created areas. † Methods Population colonization, longevity and extinction were investigated over 20 years using 133 populations. Seed-bank longevity was determined from germination trials of seeds exhumed from extinct and extant sites via a 10-year glasshouse trial and by in situ sowing experiments. From 27 populations, 98 cohorts were followed and matrix models of transitions from seeds to adults were used to evaluate the intrinsic rate of population growth against disturbance histories. Ten populations (38 cohorts) with different disturbance histories were used to evaluate sensitivities in vital rates. † Key Results Most populations had few individuals (30) and were transient (,5 years above ground). The intrinsic population growth ratewas rarely .1 and all but two populations were extinct at year 20. Seeds were short-lived in situ.