DOCSLIB.ORG

Regional Identities of Czech Historical Lands

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regional Identities of Czech Historical Lands DOI: 10.15201/hungeobull.65.1.2Vaishar, A. and Zapletalová, Hungarian J. Hungarian Geographical Geographical Bulletin Bulletin 65 65 2016 (2016) (1) (1) 15–25. 15–25.15 Regional identities of Czech historical lands Antonín VAISHAR and Jana ZAPLETALOVÁ1 Abstract Bohemia and Moravia are historical lands, which constitute Czechia (together with a small part of Silesia) since the 10th century. Two entirely diff erent sett lement systems can be identifi ed in Czechia: the centralistic Bohemian sett lement system surrounded by a ring of mountains, and the transitional and polycentric Moravian sett lement system. The two lands were physically divided by a border forest. Although they have belonged always to the same state, their autonomy was relatively high until the formation of the Czechoslovak Republic in 1918. In 1948, a new administrative division was introduced, which did not respect the border between the two lands. Bohemia and Moravia kept their importance as diff erent cultural units only. The main research question addressed in this paper is how the Bohemian and Moravian identities are perceived by the people today and whether it makes any sense to consider the historical lands seriously when rethinking the idea of the Europe of regions. Keywords: regional identity, administrative division, historical lands, Bohemia, Moravia, Czech Republic Introduction decision making power is dominated by the large ones. Conversely, big countries fear The idea of nation-state was introduced as a high participation of small countries in the result of the Treaty of Westphalia (1648). Its decision-making process, although they pro- purpose was to change the old dynastic sys- vide the majority of resources for EU level tem into a new territorial one. Nationalism, programmes. The solution could be a unifi ed developing in the subsequent two centuries, Europe divided into historically grounded became the main ideology all over Europe. regions, which can be more comparable in Many times, the idea was abused for provok- size. Applegate, C. (1999) writes: Europe has ing wars and confl icts. In (western) Europe, always been and remains very much a continent the confl icts among nation-states were over- of regional identities. come by creating the European Union, which Keating, M. (1998) explains that regions governed relations between two traditional are no longer confi ned with the borders of enemies: Germany and France among other their nation-states but have become actors in things. Recently, the power has shift ed from European and international politics, and they the level of nation-states to multinational cor- fi nd themselves increasingly in competition porations and banks. In 2010, Herman van with each other. In this way regional identity Rompuy, president of the European Council, has been increasingly identifi ed in the EU´s declared that the idea of nation-states is over. cohesion policy as an important element for European integration is the most important regional development (Paasi, A. 2009). challenge in this process. Of course, regional identity is subject to The problem of nation-states in Europe a long term development process. Nation- consists of – among other things – the fact states are deeply ingrained in people’s that the Union is formed by countries of very minds. Nationalism is also a tempting card diff erent size. Small countries fear that the in the hands of populist politicians. The fi rst 1 Institute of Geonics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Department of Environmental Geography, Drobného 28, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic. E-mails: [email protected], [email protected] 16 Vaishar, A. and Zapletalová, J. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 65 (2016) (1) 15–25. att empts to give some political power to the ants are proud to be part of the region and have European regions can be traced back to the a strong territorial connection. In addition, the Maastricht Treaty in 1993 and the establish- authors’ idea on regional solidarity likely ment of the Council of Regions one year later. acting as a factor of regional identity is also Painter, J. (2002) pointed out that the idea is relevant for our case study. more top-down than bott om-up and, thus, it The concept of identity has been used is a question whether it will resonate in the since the 1980s – regional identity being regions themselves. Paasi, A. (2001) expressed a special manifestation thereof (Paasi, A. the idea that European regions are the results 2003). The author defi nes regional identity of regionalization processes more than his- as a relationship between a group of people torical and cultural products. Thus, the ques- and the bounding region. Regional identity tion arises whether regions, which are mostly is understood as an abstraction that can be embedded in the history, are perceived as rel- used to analyse links between social actors evant entities by their inhabitants. and the process of institutionalisation (Paasi, Czechia consists of two historical lands: A. 2002). According to Chromý, P. and Janů, Bohemia and Moravia. In the course of his- H. (2003) a particular territory with the specifi c tory, small and discontinuous parts of Silesia social, economic or developmental conditions were connected with the territory of the state. (specifi c historical development) serve as a base Since the administrative autonomy of the his- for forming the territorial/regional identity. Such torical lands was gradually degrading, they regions are neither economic nor administra- have not created any administrative unit tive constructs but rather realistic territorial neither their borders have been kept within units embedded in the mental memory of the borders of lower level units (regions, dis- people. As Odehnal, J. and Šerý, M. (2012) tricts, communes). note, regional identity is closely related to re- On the other hand, it seems that cultural gional borders. These boundaries play an impor- characteristics and diff erences have survived. tant role in shaping the regional identity because The question is whether the borders between they help to defi ne the region, thus helping peo- these historical lands are kept in the mind of ple to perceive “their” region. Toušek, V. et al. people and whether this historical memory (1991) dealt with the problem of boundaries can be used to create regional and local iden- between the Czech historical lands just aft er tities and, thus, enhance regional develop- the political change. ment and cohesion in general. The problem of borders and borderlands is relatively frequent in the contemporary European geography. The research is focused The identity of European regions mostly on the consequences of the elimina- tion of borders within the framework of Regional identity relates to the concept of European integration and later within the us – and the others (see e.g. Neumann, I.B. Schengen zone. In the mainstream literature 1999). According to Paasi, A. (1986), region- the emphasis oft en lie on the changes from al identity could be divided into two parts: physical barriers to a psychological or mental subjective (images of the region held by its one (e.g. Newman, D. 2006 and many oth- inhabitants and those living outside of the ers). As Lundén, T. and Zalamans, D. (2001) region) and objective (based on physical or pointed out there has been a geographical re- economic indicators). According to Sedlacek, focusing of the border away from the level of the S. et al. (2009), regional identity relates to re- State down to internal regions, municipalities gional consciousness and regional solidarity: and neighbourhoods. Regional solidarity is an aspect functioning as a Which territorial units come into account landmark of a particular region, which implies to understand Europe as a unity of regions? a specifi c relationship with the region. Inhabit- Such units should be large enough to have Vaishar, A. and Zapletalová, J. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 65 (2016) (1) 15–25. 17 related economic and political powers, they Jeseník district based on the concept of men- should be more or less comparable in size tal maps. They stated that regional identity and should have some historically rooted is relatively weak. However, it is necessary identity. Such historical regions exist in all to note that the original population of the larger (West) European countries (Länder Jeseník area was almost completely replaced in Germany, Provinces historiques in France, aft er World War II; therefore, its regional Comuninades autónomas in Spain, Regioni in identity became weakened in general. On the Italy, Regions in England, etc.). The bounda- other hand, it is also important to emphasise ries of some of them are clear and unchanged that the land’s identity is only a part of the during centuries; in other cases, their size was regional identity. slightly changed in the past. Nevertheless, In the 1991 population census, it was pos- also in the western part of Europe, problems sible to declare the Moravian and Silesian of regional identity occur as e.g. Fichtner, U. ethnic background besides the Czech nation- (2006) shows on the example of the Southern ality. At that time, about 1.3 million inhabit- Upper Rhine Valley. ants declared the Moravian nationality (13% The situation in Central and Eastern of the population). It was partly connected Europe is more complicated. Boundaries of with the eff orts of some Moravian micro- individual states oft en changed in the his- regions to be connected with Moravian dis- tory; historical lands were oft en divided by tricts or regions and with the political am- diff erent countries. The second problem is bitions of some Moravian politicians. In the connected with the fact that many countries 2001 census, only 400,000 people declared in this part of Europe have gained (or re- the Moravian ethnicity (3.7% of the popu- gained) political independence only a short lation).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Twenty Years After the Iron Curtain: the Czech Republic in Transition Zdeněk Janík March 25, 2010
    Twenty Years after the Iron Curtain: The Czech Republic in Transition Zdeněk Janík March 25, 2010 Assistant Professor at Masaryk University in the Czech Republic n November of last year, the Czech Republic commemorated the fall of the communist regime in I Czechoslovakia, which occurred twenty years prior.1 The twentieth anniversary invites thoughts, many times troubling, on how far the Czechs have advanced on their path from a totalitarian regime to a pluralistic democracy. This lecture summarizes and evaluates the process of democratization of the Czech Republic’s political institutions, its transition from a centrally planned economy to a free market economy, and the transformation of its civil society. Although the political and economic transitions have been largely accomplished, democratization of Czech civil society is a road yet to be successfully traveled. This lecture primarily focuses on why this transformation from a closed to a truly open and autonomous civil society unburdened with the communist past has failed, been incomplete, or faced numerous roadblocks. HISTORY The Czech Republic was formerly the Czechoslovak Republic. It was established in 1918 thanks to U.S. President Woodrow Wilson and his strong advocacy for the self-determination of new nations coming out of the Austro-Hungarian Empire after the World War I. Although Czechoslovakia was based on the concept of Czech nationhood, the new nation-state of fifteen-million people was actually multi- ethnic, consisting of people from the Czech lands (Bohemia, Moravia, and Silesia), Slovakia, Subcarpathian Ruthenia (today’s Ukraine), and approximately three million ethnic Germans. Since especially the Sudeten Germans did not join Czechoslovakia by means of self-determination, the nation- state endorsed the policy of cultural pluralism, granting recognition to the various ethnicities present on its soil.
    [Show full text]
  • Czech Language Programs and Czech As a Heritage Language in the United States
    Czech Language Programs and Czech as a Heritage Language in the United States Simone J. Hrouda, Portland State University, Oregon Introduction Czech language schools and Czech classes exist across the United States because of the efforts of Czech heritage language speakers to preserve the language spoken by their ancestors. These programs provide heritage speakers with the opportunity to further develop and maintain their Czech oral and written skills. Even though the language and culture are vital to the identity of individuals in states such as Nebraska, Texas, and Wisconsin, the importance of sustaining the language is not recognized on a national level. Czech is not considered a critical foreign language, and limited opportunities are available for language courses and scholarship programs. It is up to Czech heritage societies to keep Czech classes alive. Czech is a less commonly taught language (LCTL) in the United States, and locating Czech classes is difficult. However, these challenges and many others do not hinder Czech speakers from learning the Czech language. Though small, there is a Czech-speaking population made up of heritage, non-heritage, and native speakers who are making efforts to keep the Czech language alive. History of the Czech Language in the United States The largest immigration of Czechs to the United States took place between the years 1848 and 1914, when over 350,000 Czechs fled their homeland and established Czech communities across the United States (Thernstorm, 1981). Over time, language attrition and acculturation have led to loss of the Czech language within these communities (Dutkova-Cope, 2006; Eckert, 1987; Hannan, 2003; Vasek, 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • A Supplementary Figures and Tables
    A Supplementary figures and tables This Online Appendix provides supplementary material and is for online publication only. A1 Figure A1: Population in the Czech lands (in millions) 10 8 6 4 2 Total population Czechs Germans 0 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 Notes: The figure shows total population of the Czech Republic (Czech lands consisting of Bohemia, Moravia and Silesia) between 1921 and 2011 (light gray), and population by self-declared ethnicity (black and dark gray). The German population (dark gray bullets) was almost entirely expelled in 1945 and 1946 and partly replaced by residents mainly from Czech hinterlands and Slovakia. ‘Czechs’ refers to all other non-German residents (black triangles). A2 Figure A2: Demarcation line and pre-existing infrastructure 1930 counties 1938 Sudetenland Main roads and railways Rivers Notes: The maps compare the demarcation line between US and Red Army forces in 1945 Czechoslovakia (red line) to county boundaries as of 1930, Sudetenland as of the Munich Agreement in 1938, main roads and railways, and rivers. A3 Figure A3: Demarcation line between US and Red Army forces in 1945 Czechoslovakia US-liberated Sudetenland Red Army-liberated Sudetenland Notes: The map zooms into Figure 1 in the main text. The red line represents the demarcation line between US and Red Army forces in 1945 Czechoslovakia, which runs from Karlovy Vary over Plzeň to České Budějovice (black dots). Prague is the capital city. The US-liberated regions of Sudetenland are in dark gray, the Red Army-liberated regions are in light gray. Sudetenland was settled by ethnic Germans and annexed by Nazi Germany in October 1938.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Kingdom of Bohemia
    14 października 2020 In the Kingdom of Bohemia In the Kingdom of Bohemia In the 14th century, due to the Bohemian expansion, Silesia was separated from Poland and became a part of the Crown of the Kingdom of Bohemia. In 1327, Władysław Bytomski, Duke of Koźle, and his younger brothers, Jerzy and Siemowit, were the first ones to pay homage to John the Blind, King of Bohemia. Although their father, Casimir, already paid homage to Wenceslaus II, the then-King of Bohemia, in 1289, Wenceslaus was simultaneously the ruler of Poland. At the time when Władysław paid homage to Bohemia, Poland was already ruled by Władysław Łokietek, Duke of Kujawy and Lesser Poland, who was considering coronation. As a consequence of the subordination of subsequent Silesian duchies to Bohemia, aside from being obliged to participate in war expeditions of Bohemian rulers and to appear at the court in Prague, the Silesian Piasts also had to respect the decisions made by the Bohemian king in accordance with the Bohemian law. One of such astounding decisions was made in the case of the succession of the Duchy of Koźle after the heirless death of Bolesław, Duke of Koźle and Bytom, in 1355. According to the Polish law, the duchy could be inherited only by a man, and therefore, the closest relative of Bolesław, Casimir, Duke of Cieszyn, was preparing himself to rule Koźle. However, as stated in the Bohemian law, the succession could also occur in the female line, and since the deceased Bolesław had a sister, Eufemia, the fight for the succession was joined by her husband, Duke Konrad of Oleśnica.
    [Show full text]
  • Young Czechs' Perceptions of the Velvet Divorce and The
    YOUNG CZECHS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE VELVET DIVORCE AND THE MODERN CZECH IDENTITY By BRETT RICHARD CHLOUPEK Bachelor of Science in Geography Bachelor of Science in C.I.S. University of Nebraska Kearney Kearney, NE 2005 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE July, 2007 YOUNG CZECHS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE VELVET DIVORCE AND THE MODERN CZECH IDENTITY Thesis Approved: Reuel Hanks Dr. Reuel Hanks (Chair) Dale Lightfoot Dr. Dale Lightfoot Joel Jenswold Dr. Joel Jenswold Dr. A. Gordon Emslie Dean of the Graduate College ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Reuel Hanks for encouraging me to pursue this project. His continued support and challenging insights into my work made this thesis a reality. Thanks go to my other committee members, Dr. Dale Lightfoot and Dr. Joel Jenswold for their invaluable advice, unique expertise, and much needed support throughout the writing of my thesis. A great deal of gratitude is due to the faculties of Charles University in Prague, CZ and Masaryk University in Brno, CZ for helping administer student surveys and donating their valuable time. Thank you to Hana and Ludmila Svobodova for taking care of me over the years and being my family away from home in the Moravské Budejovice. Thanks go to Sylvia Mihalik for being my resident expert on all things Slovak and giving me encouragement. Thank you to my grandmother Edith Weber for maintaining ties with our Czech relatives and taking me back to the ‘old country.’ Thanks to all of my extended family for remembering our heritage and keeping some of its traditions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transition of a New World Bohemia
    THE TRANSITION OF A NEW-WORLD BOHEMIA^ In the years immediately following the unsuccessful revo­ lution of 1848, the Czechs were finding life in their native land under Austrian rule more and more unbearable. They were irked by political oppression, the economic status of the majority was deplorable, many chafed under the re­ quirements imposed by military service and under the reli­ gious intolerance of the government. After the Hussite wars of the sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries, the defeated remnants of Hus's followers were driven into the mountainous districts of Bohemia and Moravia.^ They might have been forced to submit to the Austrian rule of church and state if the Reformation under Luther had not again aroused them to a consciousness of their religious status. For more than a hundred years all their political and religious activities took place in secret under unremit­ ting persecution. At the beginning of the fifties of the last century, after the hopes of the Czechs had once more been shattered, the United States immigration agents found fer­ tile soil for propaganda among the members of the dissatis­ fied sects of Hussites and Moravian Brethren. Wisconsin was then making strenuous efforts to attract settlers from northern and central Europe. Thousands of Germans were immigrating to the vicinity of Milwaukee, which became known as the German Athens. There they were joined by large groups of Protestant Czechs, who felt ^A paper read at the afternoon session of the eighty-fifth annual meeting of the Minnesota Historical Society, held in the Historical Building, St. Paul, on January 8, 1934.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    introduction Writing a Postwar History The biggest victim of the Stalinization of architecture was housing. [Karel] Teige would have recoiled in horror at the endless drab rows of prefabricated boxes of mass housing proliferating around all the major cities of Czechoslo- vakia. Here was the exact antithesis of his utopia of collective dwelling, resem- bling more the housing barracks of capitalist rent exploitation and greed than the joyful housing developments of a new socialist paradise. The result was one of the most depressing collections of banality in the history of Czech architecture, one that still mars the architectural landscape of this small coun- try and will be difficult—if not impossible—to erase from its map for decades, if not centuries. Eric Dluhosch, 2002 Few building types are as vilified as the socialist housing block. Built by the thousands in Eastern Europe in the decades after World War II, the apartment buildings of the planned economy are notorious for problems such as faulty construction methods, lack of space, nonexistent landscaping, long-term maintenance lapses, and general ugliness. The typical narrative of the con- struction and perceived failure of these blocks, the most iconic of which was the structural panel building (panelový dům or panelák, for short, in Czech), places the blame with a Soviet-imposed system of building that was forced upon the unwilling countries of Eastern Europe after the Communists came to power.1 This shift not only brought neoclassicism and historicism to the region but also ended the idealistic era of avant-garde modernism, which dis- appeared with the arrival of fascism in many European countries but sur- vived in Czechoslovakia through World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • « a Window to the Soul »: the Moravian Folklore in Leoš Janáýek's Works
    « A WINDOW TO THE SOUL »: THE MORAVIAN FOLKLORE IN LEOŠ JANÁýEK'S WORKS Ph. D. Haiganuú PREDA-SCHIMEK Musicologist, Vienna Born in 1971, graduate of the University of Music in Bucharest, professor Grigore Constantinescu’s class; after graduation, music editor at the Romanian Broadcasting Society (1993-1995 and July – December 1996), Ph. D. in musicology at the University of Music in Bucharest (2002). Established in Vienna since 1997, where she lives today. Between 1995-1997, she had a doctoral scholarship at Österreichischer Akademischer Austauschdienst (ÖAAD) and between 1999-2002 she was a scientific collaborator of the University of La Rioja (Logroño, Spain). As a researcher attached to the Institute of Theory, Analysis and History of Music of the University of Music in Vienna, she conducted research projects under the aegis of the Austrian Scientific Community (2004, 2005-2006, 2011), of the Commune of Vienna (2007) of the Ministry of Science and Research, Austria (2007-2010); in 2008, she was visiting researcher at the Centre Interdisciplinaire de Recherches Centre-Européennes (Paris, Université IV, Sorbonne). Participations in international conferences (Romania, Austria, United Kingdom, Ireland, Germany, France, Lithuania, Latvia, Poland, Serbia), studies published among others in the Musicologica Austriaca (Vienna), Österreichische Musikzeitschrift (Vienna), Musurgia. Analyse et pratique musicales (Paris), Musikgeschichte in Mittel- und Osteuropa (Leipzig); editorial debut with the volume Form and Melody between Classicism and Romanticism at Editura Muzicală (Bucharest, 2003). Scientific reviewer of the publications Musicology Today (University of Music, Bucharest) and Musicology Papers (Academy of Music, Cluj-Napoca). Since 2007, collaborator of the Radio România Muzical, as correspondent. Lectures delivered at the University of Music and Dramatic Arts in Vienna (2009) and within the Master’s programme of Balkan Studies (University of Vienna, Institute for the Danube Area and Central Europe - 2009, 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Droughts in the Czech Lands, 1090–2012 AD Open Access Geoscientific Geoscientific Open Access 1,2 1,2 2,3 4 1,2 5 2,6 R
    EGU Journal Logos (RGB) Open Access Open Access Open Access Advances in Annales Nonlinear Processes Geosciences Geophysicae in Geophysics Open Access Open Access Natural Hazards Natural Hazards and Earth System and Earth System Sciences Sciences Discussions Open Access Open Access Atmospheric Atmospheric Chemistry Chemistry and Physics and Physics Discussions Open Access Open Access Atmospheric Atmospheric Measurement Measurement Techniques Techniques Discussions Open Access Open Access Biogeosciences Biogeosciences Discussions Open Access Open Access Clim. Past, 9, 1985–2002, 2013 Climate www.clim-past.net/9/1985/2013/ Climate doi:10.5194/cp-9-1985-2013 of the Past of the Past © Author(s) 2013. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Discussions Open Access Open Access Earth System Earth System Dynamics Dynamics Discussions Droughts in the Czech Lands, 1090–2012 AD Open Access Geoscientific Geoscientific Open Access 1,2 1,2 2,3 4 1,2 5 2,6 R. Brazdil´ , P. Dobrovolny´ , M. Trnka , O. Kotyza , L. Reznˇ ´ıckovˇ a´ , H. Vala´sekˇ Instrumentation, P. Zahradn´ıcekˇ , and Instrumentation P. Stˇ epˇ anek´ 2,6 Methods and Methods and 1Institute of Geography, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic 2Global Change Research Centre AV CR,ˇ Brno, Czech Republic Data Systems Data Systems 3Institute of Agrosystems and Bioclimatology, Mendel University in Brno, Czech Republic Discussions Open Access 4 Open Access Regional Museum, Litomeˇrice,ˇ Czech Republic Geoscientific 5Moravian Land Archives, Brno, Czech Republic Geoscientific 6 Model Development Czech Hydrometeorological Institute, Brno, Czech Republic Model Development Discussions Correspondence to: R. Brazdil´ ([email protected]) Open Access Received: 29 April 2013 – Published in Clim. Past Discuss.: 8 May 2013 Open Access Revised: 4 July 2013 – Accepted: 8 July 2013 – Published: 20 August 2013 Hydrology and Hydrology and Earth System Earth System Abstract.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Tourism As a Driver of Rural Development. Case Study: Southern Moravia
    sustainability Article Cultural Tourism as a Driver of Rural Development. Case Study: Southern Moravia Milada Št’astná * , Antonín Vaishar, Jiˇrí Brychta, Kristýna Tuzová, Jan Zloch and Veronika Stodolová Department of Applied and Landscape Ecology, Mendel University in Brno, Brno 61300, Czech Republic; [email protected] (A.V.); [email protected] (J.B.); [email protected] (K.T.); [email protected] (J.Z.); [email protected] (V.S.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +420-606-580-412 Received: 13 October 2020; Accepted: 29 October 2020; Published: 31 October 2020 Abstract: The main aim of the study was to find out whether cultural tourism could be a driver of rural development in the selected area and in general. In case yes, to what extent and under what conditions. Three districts in the South-Moravian Region, Znojmo, Bˇreclav, and Hodonín, situated in the rural borderland with Austria and Slovakia represented the study area. Both geographical and sociological methods were used to gather evidence for cultural tourism in that study. Firstly, attractiveness analysis of the area defined for cultural tourism took place. Next, factors influencing the potential for cultural tourism affecting rural development in South Moravia were evaluated. Finally, synergistic relations were discussed. In the territory, many forms of tourism intersect. Based on the results, it can be stated that cultural tourism can hardly be the main driver of rural development after the decline of agriculture because the region’s economy has branched out in several directions. However, it can be an important complementary activity that yields both economic and non-economic benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • The Czech Republic: in the Heart of Europe
    The Czech Republic: In The Heart of Europe JAROSLAV STIKA AND JOSEF JANCAR For many years, Cech wandered through Europe Roman Emperor. For a short while, Charles in search of a new home for his people. One day, succeeded in turning the Czech Lands into the from the summit of Mount Rip, he saw beneath political and cultural center of the empire. He him a pleasant land of rolling hills and fertile relocated the Holy Roman capital to Prague plains. The area was protected by mountains - and built the great castle of KarlStejn and the the Giant Mountains (Krkonose) and the Ash famous stone bridge (now known as Charles Mountains (Jeseniky) in the north, and the Bridge) over the River Vltava. In 1348, he Beskids (Beskydy) and Maple Mountains founded the first university in Central Europe, (!avorniky) in the east - and by the seemingly later to be called Charles University. Rudolf II, impenetrable Bohemian Forest (Sumava) in the a Hapsburg monarch, also achieved promi­ south. Three great rivers, the Elbe (Labe), Oder nence later as a patron of the arts, sciences, (Odra), and Morava, watered the country. As he and the occult. scanned the landscape beneath him, Cech smiled Yet, despite the prominence of their king­ knowingly. This was where his people would set­ dom, the Czech people found themselves in tle. Years later his descendants named the land­ constant confrontation with their more power­ and themselves - Czech, in honor of the great ful German-speaking neighbors to the north, ancestor who brought them there. west, and south - even today, the borders with Germany and Austria account for two­ he legend of Cech is an integral part of thirds of the circumference of the Czech the folklore of the Czech Republic.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to the Region of Moravian Slovakia – the Watermill in Bohuslavice
    Welcome to the region of Moravian Slovakia – The Watermill in Bohuslavice At the crossroads of routs between Vienna (90km), Bratislava (100km), Budapest (400km) and Praha (190km), in the village of Bohuslavice, set in the woodland near the town of Kyjov, a historical building from the 18th century is situated: a former watermill. This ecologically preserved region offers visitors a rich history as well as a teeming contemporary cultural life. 1 Welcome to Slovácko, the region of living songs, rich cooking and good wine. Slovácko, („Moravian Slovakia“), is the border between two historical countries – Moravia and Slovakia. It is the land of the lower reaches of the Morava river. The origin of the local people is reflected in both the language and the name of the region – for they are, traditionally, both Moravians and Slovaks. A thousand-year-old arch connects the famous period of Great Moravia with the order, rhythm and poetry of the wine culture with its living music. Slovácko is near to other great cultural centres – Vienna, Brno, Bratislava and Prague. Wine cellars nestled beneath trees – this is a symbol of the Moravian landscape. Historical towns in Slovácko region reflect an old bygone aristocracy and a time when fortresses protected the land from periodic invasions. The history of the landscape and towns 2 in this region stretches back to the 8th and 9th century when a fortified settlement in the Morava river basin was directly at the centre of the great Christian civilization. The rivers in Moravia provided favourable conditions for the building of thousands of watermills, of which only a handful have survived intact; the Bohuslavice watermill is one of them.
    [Show full text]