Chamaecrista absus LC Taxonomic Authority: (L.) H.S.Irwin & Barneby  Global Assessment  Regional Assessment Region: Global  Endemic to region Synonyms Common Names absus L. TROPICAL SENSITIVE PE Unknown Grimaldia absus (L.) Britton & Rose

Upper Level Kingdom: PLANTAE Phylum: TRACHEOPHYTA Class: MAGNOLIOPSIDA Order: Family: LEGUMINOSAE Lower Level Taxonomy Rank: Infra- rank name:  Hybrid Subpopulation: Authority:

General Information Distribution Chamaecrista absus has a very large geographical distribution, that includes North and South America, tropical Africa, southern Asia and Australasia.

Range Size Elevation Biogeographic Realm Area of Occupancy: Upper limit: 1500  Afrotropical Extent of Occurrence: Lower limit: 0  Antarctic Map Status: Depth  Australasian Upper limit:  Neotropical Lower limit:  Oceanian Depth Zones  Palearctic  Shallow photic  Bathyl  Hadal  Indomalayan  Photic  Abyssal  Nearctic Population This taxon is common and widespread.

Total Population Size Minimum Population Size: Maximum Population Size: Habitat and Ecology C. absus is found in grasslands, grassy hills, pastures, savannahs with Bryrsonima and Curatella, also in openings in tropical deciduous forest and pine-oak forest.

System Movement pattern Crop Wild Relative  Terrestrial  Freshwater  Nomadic  Congregatory/Dispersive  Is the a wild relative of a crop?  Marine  Migratory  Altitudinally migrant

Growth From Definition Growth From Definition Annual An annual plant, also termed a Therophyte Forb or Herb Biennial or perennial herbacaeous plant, also termed a Hemicryptophyte

Threats This taxon is not considered to be specifically theatened or in decline at present.

Past Present Future 13 None    Conservation Measures This taxonis known to occur within protected areas across its native range and seeds have been collected by the Millennium Seed Bank Project as a method of ex situ conservation.

In Place Needed 3 Research actions   3.2 Population numbers and range   3.3 Biology and Ecology   3.4 Habitat status   3.5 Threats   3.6 Uses and harvest levels   3.7 Cultural relevance   3.8 Conservation measures   3.9 Trends/Monitoring   4 Habitat and site-based actions   4.4 Protected areas   5 Species-based actions   5.7 Ex situ conservation actions   5.7.2 Genome resource bank  

Countries of Occurrence

PRESENCE ORIGIN Year Breeding Non- Passage Possibly Extinct Presence Native Introduced Re- Vagrant Origin Round Season breeding migrant extinct uncertain Introduced uncertain only season only Angola             Australia             Bangladesh             Benin             Bhutan             Bolivia             Botswana             Brazil             British Indian Ocean Territory             Burundi             Central African Republic             Chad             Congo, The Democratic             Republic of the Costa Rica             Côte d'Ivoire             Ecuador             Ethiopia             Gambia             Ghana             Grenada             Guatemala             Guinea             India             Indonesia             Jamaica             Kenya             Madagascar             Malawi             Mali             Mauritius             Mexico             Mozambique             Myanmar             Namibia             Nepal             Niger             Nigeria             Pakistan             Papua New Guinea             Paraguay             Peru             Senegal             Sierra Leone             South Africa             Sri Lanka             Sudan             Swaziland             Tanzania             Thailand             Togo             Uganda             United States             Venezuela             Viet Nam             Yemen             Zambia             Zimbabwe            

Species Utilisation  Species is not utilised at all

Purpose / Type of Use Subsistence National International 3. Medicine - human and veterinary   

Trend in the level of wild offtake/harvest in relation to total wild population numbers over the last five years: Trend in the level of wild offtake/harvest in relation to total wild population numbers over the last five years: Trend in the amount of offtake/harvest produced through domestication/cultivation over the last five years: CITES status: Not listed

IUCN Red Listing Red List Assessment: (using 2001 IUCN system) Least Concern (LC)

Red List Criteria: Date Last Seen (only for EX, EW or Possibly EX species): Is the species Possibly Extinct?  Possibly Extinct Candidate?  Rationale for the Red List Assessment C. absus is a common species with an extremely widespread distribution. The taxon is is known to occur within the protected areas network and is not known to be experiencing and major threatening processes at present. C. absus is thus rated as Least Concern. Reason(s) for Change in Red List Category from the Previous Assessment:  Genuine Change  Nongenuine Change  No Change  Genuine (recent)  New information  Taxonomy  Same category  Genuine (since first assessment)  Knowledge of Criteria  Criteria Revisio and criteria  Incorrect data used  Other  Same category but previously change in criteria Current Population Trend: Stable Date of Assessment: 10/08/2010 Name(s) of the Assessor(s): Groom, A. Evaluator(s): Notes:

% population decline in the past: Time period over which the past decline has been measured for applying Criterion A or C1 (in years or generations): % population decline in the future: Time period over which the future decline has been measured for applying Criterion A or C1 (in years or generations): Number of Locations: Severely Fragmented: Number of Mature Individuals:

Bibliography Brako, L. & Zarucchi, J. L., 1993, Catalogue of the Flowering and Gymnosperms of Peru, 45 nosperms of Peru, Vol 45, , Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard., Erkens, R H.; Maas, P.J.M.; Chatrou, L. W.; Schatz, G E. & Zamora, N., 2006, Seven taxonomic discoveries in Annonaceae from South-Eastern Central America., Blumea2, 199-220, , Howard, R.A. et al., 1988, Flora of the Lesser Antilles, Dicotyledoneae Part 1, Arnold Arboretum, , , Irwin, H.S. and Barneby, R.C., 1982, The American Cassiinae: A synoptical revision of Leguminosae tribe Cassieae subtribe Cassiinae in the New World., Mem. New York Bot. Gard., 1–918, , Jørgensen, P.M. and León-Yánez, S., 1999, Catalogue of the vascular plants of Ecuador, Vol 75, , Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard., McVaugh, R., 1987, Flora Novo-Galiciana: Leguminosae, Vol 5, University of Michigan Press, , , Reyes-García, A. & M. Sousa S., 1997, Depresión central de Chiapas. La Selva baja caducifolia., Listados Floríst. México, 1–41., , Schatz, G. & Phillipson, P., 2011, Catalogue of the Vascular Plants of Madagascar., , Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard.,