Science and Science Fiction - Fall 2019

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Science and Science Fiction - Fall 2019 Honors 313 Seminar, Section 3 - Science and Science Fiction - Fall 2019 Instructor: Prof. Calvin Johnson, Department of Physics Office: P-135 Phone: 4-1284 E-mail: cjohnson@ sdsu.edu Official office hours: MTu 2:00-3:00pm. If my door is open, you are welcome. Class time and place: EBA 249 Tuesday 3:30pm - 6:10 pm Class Website: http://sci.sdsu.edu/johnson/ssf/ also posted on Blackboard Class description This class will expose you to broad scientific frameworks and their portrayal in fiction, and will place science fiction properly against known scientific context and methodologies. The class will compare science with mythology and how science is viewed as mythology both in fiction and by non-scientists. We will discuss tools and paradigms for analysis and criticism of fictive portrayals of science; we will also emphasize basic science literacy as background for these stories. Although a course about science, this class will be heavy on reading and writing: every two weeks you will read a book and more and write a paper. Required Texts: Timescape, Gregory Benford (1980). Physicists try to send a message back in time to 1962 UC La Jolla to stop an environmental disaster. The Dispossessed, Ursula LeGuin, (1974). Physicist develops faster-than-light communication, against the backdrop of personal and political drama. Aurora, Kim Stanley Robinson, (2015). Interstellar colonization runs into trouble, both scientific and social. Robinson may join us via Skype later in the semester. The Three-Body Problem, Cixin Liu (2014). A dangerous alien invasion set in motion by China's Cultural Revolution. Brave New World, Aldous Huxley, (1932). Cloning, capitalism, and communism collide in this classic novel. Nekropolis, Maureen F. McHugh (2001). Genetic-engineered humans from future North Africa flee to Europe. Note: some sexual themes. + additional readings to be discussed in class Films to be viewed in class, in whole or in part: Metropolis (1927): Labor issues beneath a utopia for the privileged. Silent classic. Things to Come (1936): After a devastating world war, a utopia arises--but resistance to "progress" remains. Planet of the Apes (1968): Cultures and truths collide when astronauts land on a planet ruled by apes. Gattaca (1997). In the near future, your genes are your destiny. Sleep Dealers (2008). Technology may change, but border issues do not. Set in near- future Tijuana. The Martian (2015). Ingenuity and grit save an astronaut stranded on Mars. Honors 313 Science and Science Fiction Fall 2019 How this course is structured In this course you will engage with narratives about science, and will compare and contrast those narratives with how science is actually done. This is not a course about scientific correctness so much as understanding how science is really done as well as developing an awareness of how people talk about science. We will also talk about some basic scientific principles. Primarily you will read science fiction texts, novels and online short stories, and will be responsible for writing five papers, discussed in detail below, analyzing the narratives about science in those texts. You won't be doing this in isolation; you will break up into small groups of 4-5 members each, and regularly workshop drafts of your papers. These peer workshops are intended to, first, help you craft better papers and, second, expose you to the thoughts and insights of your classmates. We will also watch, in whole or in part, movies that illustrate major themes and ideas in this course, and you will have an opportunity to write about dramatic presentations of science fiction. Nonetheless our primary focus will be on written texts, as we want to grapple with science fiction as a "literature of ideas" and dramatic presentations tend to emphasize dazzling visuals over ideas. While I will lecture on science, science fiction, how we "read" science fiction, and various elements of science and science fiction, and present my own analyses of our texts, we will also have lengthy class discussions. I expect everyone to participate in discussions, and to enforce this, for each of our assigned novels there will be four student discussion leaders; that is, everyone will be required to speak to the class about at least one novel. These discussions will be informal, that is, I don't expected a prepared lecture, but I do expect you to make thoughtful and well-reasoned arguments based upon evidence from the novel. There is no exact format: the four discussion leaders could each speak separately or participate in a back-and-forth. Everyone is welcome to discuss each novel, by the way, but I expect the discussion leaders to, well, lead. I will also prompt people who do not speak frequently to add their voices as well as keeping notes on who participates in discussions. We will also discuss, and you will have the opportunity to incorporate into your papers, narratives about science found in wider society, such as in news items and in so- called "controversies" such as climate change, evolution, vaccines, and genetically modified organisms. Often we will be asking: are these narratives really about the correctness of the science, or about something else? You come from a wide variety of disciplines and I hope you all bring your diverse perspectives to our discussions and to your papers. I do not want you to simply parrot my analyses, but to bring your own creativity and insight to your analyses. This also means I am not interested in mere "opinions." I want you to bring logic and above all evidence to support your arguments. I also want you to be ware of the difference between how science is done and how it is often talked about. Assignments and grade basis: Class participation (15%): missing no more than 2 classes; leading discussion on one of our assigned novels; regular contributions to and participation in class discussion; active participation in small group workshopping of papers. Four short papers (15% each) plus final paper (25%). Honors 313 Science and Science Fiction Fall 2019 I expect in your papers (a) relevance to focus of class, i.e., science fiction as commentary on our relation to technology and science; (b) well-stated theses, that is, a particular conclusion about the text(s); (c) use of evidence from the texts, especially close reading of texts, to support the thesis; (d) demonstration that you understand how science works, i.e., is based primarily upon reproducible empirical evidence, and to be able to contrast with narratives based upon rhetorical arguments; (e) clarity and organization of the argument, as well as correct grammar and spelling and clear, crisp writing; (f) originality; although naturally I expect you to use some of the tools I provide in class, simply parroting arguments I make will not get you a high grade; and (g) participation in small group discussion and peer critique (workshop) process. This means you must turn in a first draft and a final draft of each paper. The final draft should show evidence of improvement over the first draft; furthermore, while overall I will not comment on your first drafts, really poor first drafts (i.e., ones where you clearly did not put in effort) will lower your grade. In other words: try hard on your first draft, and then make it even better for your final draft. You must turn in a first draft; if you do not turn in a first draft at the assigned time you lose half the points for that paper. Grading scale: 90%= A, 87%=A-, 83%=B+, 80%= B, 77%=B-, 73%=C+, 70%=C, 67% C- , 63%=D+, 60%=D, 57%=D-, 50%=F. As a rough guide: C = submitted all material but showed poor critical thinking and weak or trivial evidence; B = presented non-trivial ideas but still vague in portions of argument and/or evidence, or simply recycled lecturer's analyses of texts; A = outstanding, clear and original arguments well supported by the texts, as well as demonstrating understand of how science is based upon empirical evidence. To get above 90% your work must be truly outstanding, not merely “nothing wrong with it.” For each paper I will give you three scores out of 100, on: first, relevance to class material (i.e., it must be on narratives regarding science and technology); second, how persuasively you structure your arguments, in particular evidence from your source material; and third, quality of writing, i.e., good grammar, appropriate word choice (pro tip: don't call a novel a short story and vice versa), clear, concise writing. Late submissions: Late first drafts lose 50% for each day late, and final drafts 25% for each day late. On papers You will submit four short papers (about three to five pages or 600 to 900 words) and one long final paper (about five to eight pages, or 900 to 1500 words). Word/page counts are just approximate and for your guidance; I'm not going to carefully count. Each short paper will compare and contrast the themes and narratives about science and technology of one of our novels and one of the following: 1. narratives in the media about science and technology; these can be newspaper, television or online news articles or op-ed pieces; while I will allow blog posts, be wary of choosing obscure sources. This can also include text books and materials for other Honors 313 Science and Science Fiction Fall 2019 courses/fields, i.e., narratives about science and technology you find in a class on literature, political science, etc.. You should, where possible, provide a citation/link to the source (either URL or reference to origin of the news item).
Recommended publications
  • Science Fiction and Astronomy
    Sci Fi Science Fiction and Astronomy Many science fiction books include subjects of astronomical interest. Here is a list of some that have been recommended to me or I’ve read. I expect that most are not in the University library but many are available in Kindle and other e-formats. At the top of my list is a URL to a much longer list by Andrew Fraknoi of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. Each title in his list has a very brief summary indicating the kind of story it is. Andrew Fraknoi’s list (http://www.astrosociety.org/education/resources/scifi.html). Gregory Benford is a plasma physicist who has been rated by some as one of the finest observes and interpreters of science in modern fiction. Note: Timescape [Vista, ISBN 0575600500] In the Ocean of Night [Vista, ISBN 0575600357] Across the Sea of Suns [Vista, ISBN 0575600551] Great Sky River [Gallancy, ISBN 0575058315] Eater and over 2 dozen more available as e-books. Stephen Baxter Titan [Voyager, 1997, ISBN 0002254247] has been strongly recommended by New Scientist as a tense, near future, thriller you shouldn’t miss. David Brin has a PhD in astrophysics with which he brings real understanding of the Universe to his stories. The Crystal Spheres won an award. Fred Hoyle is probably the most famous astronomer to have written science fiction. The Back Cloud [Macmillan, ISBN 0333556011] is his classic, followed by A for Andromeda. Try also October the First is too late. Larry Niven’s stories include plenty of ideas inspired by modern astronomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Confiction U.S
    Third Class ConFiction U.S. Postage PAID c/o Massachusetts Convention Fandom, Inc. Permit # 228 P. O. Box 46, MIT Branch P. O. Framingham, Mass. Cambridge, MA 02139 United States of America AT 1008 - PR2 George Flynn Po Box 1069, Kendall Sq Stn CAMBRIDGE, MA 02142 VERENIGDE STATEN VAN AMERIKA ADDRESS CORRECTION REQUESTED FORWARDING AND RETURN POSTAGE GUARANTEED Nominated for a Hugo! Nominated for a Hugo Award after its first full year of The Best of Hugo Award Nominee publication, Aboriginal Science Fiction is the successful new, full-color, full-slick magazine that’s changing the way SF is done. ABO's first twelve issues are already collectors’s o Aboriginal r* items, selling for a premium. ABO-featured authors and ar­ tists include Harlan Ellison, Orson Scott Card, Frederik Science Fiction Pohl, Connie Willis, Brian W. Aldiss, Ben Bova, Charles L. Tales of the Human Kind J 1988 Annual Anthology/$4.50 Grant, Ian Watson, Carl Lundgren, Bob Eggleton and many talented newcomers. Because we have nearly run out of back issues, we have Stories by: published a special full-color anthology. The 80-page anthol­ ogy includes 12 stories and 19 pages of full-color art from our Orson Scott Card first seven issues and regularly retails for $4.50. But if you subscribe for 12 or 18 issues we’ll give you a FREE copy of the anthology along with your subscription. How good is Aboriginal SF? Here is what people are say­ ing about it: “Aboriginal is unique even in the science fiction field, a labor of love with a very special, individual character, and always a treat to read." — Poul Anderson “ — the most daring, innovative sf magazine the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Session 13 Learning from SF Väätänen
    Worldcon 75 Academic Track Session 13: Learning from SF Saturday 10:00-11:30 Room 209 Chair: Päivi Väätänen Abstract 1: Nick Falkner (University of Adelaide, Australia): Design Fiction for Education: Driving Reinterpretation of Educational Challenges in the Present through the Construction of Working Futures in Speculative Fiction [email protected] Design fiction, a term coined by Julian Bleecker of Near Future Laboratory and popularised by Bruce Sterling, is "the deliberate use of diegetic prototypes to suspend disbelief about change." To identify areas of change, we must be able to correctly perceive those elements that require change and, after Shklovsky, we must fight habitualisation and defamiliarise elements that we would otherwise overlook. The representation of education is an important part of world building and story telling, yet many examples of education are habitualised stereotype: bored students, 19th century classroom or recitative teaching machine, all combining to provide a backdrop that is glanced over. There are examples in fiction of innovative educational practices that mirror the best 21st century pedagogical practice but these are not commonplace. While few people will pick up and read papers on pedagogy, speculative fiction can provide elements for readers that will influence the community to accept the new directions in education that are often challenged by parents, students, and teachers as not being “real education”. What we often call “real education” is merely the comfortable habitual framework of tradition and educational researchers are well aware that tradition is not necessarily a guide to the best educational practices. Computer scientists and engineers are increasingly required to consider defamiliarisation as a tool for constructing new and innovative devices and software (after Genevieve Bell et al’s “Making by Making Strange”, ACM Transactions on Computer- Human Interaction, 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Science Fiction Stories with Good Astronomy & Physics
    Science Fiction Stories with Good Astronomy & Physics: A Topical Index Compiled by Andrew Fraknoi (U. of San Francisco, Fromm Institute) Version 7 (2019) © copyright 2019 by Andrew Fraknoi. All rights reserved. Permission to use for any non-profit educational purpose, such as distribution in a classroom, is hereby granted. For any other use, please contact the author. (e-mail: fraknoi {at} fhda {dot} edu) This is a selective list of some short stories and novels that use reasonably accurate science and can be used for teaching or reinforcing astronomy or physics concepts. The titles of short stories are given in quotation marks; only short stories that have been published in book form or are available free on the Web are included. While one book source is given for each short story, note that some of the stories can be found in other collections as well. (See the Internet Speculative Fiction Database, cited at the end, for an easy way to find all the places a particular story has been published.) The author welcomes suggestions for additions to this list, especially if your favorite story with good science is left out. Gregory Benford Octavia Butler Geoff Landis J. Craig Wheeler TOPICS COVERED: Anti-matter Light & Radiation Solar System Archaeoastronomy Mars Space Flight Asteroids Mercury Space Travel Astronomers Meteorites Star Clusters Black Holes Moon Stars Comets Neptune Sun Cosmology Neutrinos Supernovae Dark Matter Neutron Stars Telescopes Exoplanets Physics, Particle Thermodynamics Galaxies Pluto Time Galaxy, The Quantum Mechanics Uranus Gravitational Lenses Quasars Venus Impacts Relativity, Special Interstellar Matter Saturn (and its Moons) Story Collections Jupiter (and its Moons) Science (in general) Life Elsewhere SETI Useful Websites 1 Anti-matter Davies, Paul Fireball.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Wormholes As Gravitational Lenses
    Natural Wormholes as Gravitational Lenses John G. Cramer(1)∗, Robert L. Forward(2)†, Michael S. Morris(3)‡, Matt Visser(4)§, Gregory Benford(5)∗∗, and Geoffrey A. Landis(6)†† (1) Department of Physics FM-15, University of Washington, Seattle WA 98195 (2) Forward Unlimited, P. O. Box 2783, Malibu CA 90265 (3) Department of Physics and Astronomy, Butler University, Indianapolis IN 46208 (4) Physics Department, Washington University, St. Louis MO 63130-4899 (5) Physics Department, University of California at Irvine, Irvine CA 92717-4575 (6) NASA Lewis Research Center, Mail Code 302-1, Cleveland OH 44135-3191 (28 June 1994) Visser has suggested traversable 3-dimensional wormholes that could plausibly form naturally during Big Bang inflation. A wormhole mouth embedded in high mass density might accrete mass, giving the other mouth a net negative mass of unusual gravitational properties. The lensing of such a gravitationally negative anomalous compact halo object (GNACHO) will enhance background stars with a time profile that is observable and qualitatively different from that recently observed for massive compact halo objects (MACHOs) of positive mass. We recommend that MACHO search data be analyzed for GNACHOs. I. INTRODUCTION: WORMHOLES AND NEGATIVE MASS The work of Morris and Thorne [1,2] has led to a great deal of interest in the formation and properties of three- dimensional wormholes (topological connections between separated regions of space-time) that are solutions of the Einstein’s equations of general relativity. Subsequently Visser [3] suggested a wormhole configuration, a flat-space wormhole that is framed by “struts” of an exotic material, a variant of the cosmic string solutions of Einstein’s equations [4,5].
    [Show full text]
  • Strangest of All
    Strangest of All 1 Strangest of All TRANGEST OF LL AnthologyS of astrobiological science A fiction ed. Julie Nov!"o ! Euro#ean Astrobiology $nstitute Features G. %avid Nordley& Geoffrey Landis& Gregory 'enford& Tobias S. 'uc"ell& (eter Watts and %. A. *iaolin S#ires. + Strangest of All , Strangest of All Edited originally for the #ur#oses of 'EACON +.+.& a/conference of the Euro#ean Astrobiology $nstitute 0EA$1. -o#yright 0-- 'Y-N--N% 4..1 +.+. Julie No !"o ! 2ou are free to share this 5or" as a 5hole as long as you gi e the ap#ro#riate credit to its creators. 6o5ever& you are #rohibited fro7 using it for co77ercial #ur#oses or sharing any 7odified or deri ed ersions of it. 8ore about this #articular license at creati eco77ons.org9licenses9by3nc3nd94.0/legalcode. While this 5or" as a 5hole is under the -reati eCo77ons Attribution3 NonCo77ercial3No%eri ati es 4.0 $nternational license, note that all authors retain usual co#yright for the indi idual wor"s. :$ntroduction; < +.+. by Julie No !"o ! :)ar& $ce& Egg& =ni erse; < +..+ by G. %a id Nordley :$nto The 'lue Abyss; < 1>>> by Geoffrey A. Landis :'ac"scatter; < +.1, by Gregory 'enford :A Jar of Good5ill; < +.1. by Tobias S. 'uc"ell :The $sland; < +..> by (eter )atts :SET$ for (rofit; < +..? by Gregory 'enford :'ut& Still& $ S7ile; < +.1> by %. A. Xiaolin S#ires :After5ord; < +.+. by Julie No !"o ! :8artian Fe er; < +.1> by Julie No !"o ! 4 Strangest of All :@this strangest of all things that ever ca7e to earth fro7 outer space 7ust ha e fallen 5hile $ 5as sitting there, isible to 7e had $ only loo"ed u# as it #assed.; A H.
    [Show full text]
  • SCIENCE FICTION WRITER GREGORY BENFORD on “HIS BEST SHORT STORIES” COLLECTION by John C
    !1 SCIENCE FICTION WRITER GREGORY BENFORD ON “HIS BEST SHORT STORIES” COLLECTION By John C. Tibbetts 10/2/2015, University of Kansas JOHN TIBBETTS: Beside us is the frontispiece to “Princess of Mars” by Frank Schoonover. Okay? The question is 2016, Kansas City, world science fiction convention. I think I mentioned in a note to you, I’m putting together a panel. John Carter, 2016? So I’ve talked to Stan, I’ve talked to Greg, now I’m talking to you, Michael Dirda of the Washington Post. Put together a panel of appreciation of the character, what happened to him in the movie and maybe where is the character going? Will you join us? GREGORY BENFORD: Well the character is going to Mars. I think I put you on the spot. I certainly would like to go. I haven’t planned my exact trajectory because I’m going to be in London at a family reunion earlier that month but I could just fly directly back and get there in time. It starts August 17, I think. Yeah. So, yeah, that would be fun to be on, and Stan said he would be there? He said he would try. Maybe he was being polite. Yeah, he’s always polite. He told me once … Very polite… he’s hiking somewhere Well, he usually is hiking at that time. So am I, cause I have a place in the High Sierras. He doesn’t but he goes up there and hikes. I would like to because John Carter is that seminar figure.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 You're Listening to Imaginary Worlds, a Show About How We
    1 You’re listening to Imaginary Worlds, a show about how we create them and why we suspend our disbelief, I’m Eric Molinsky. I have a soft spot for good technobabble -- not just the technobabble itself, but scenes where the actors really sell the technobabble, and you believe what they’re talking about. And I imagine for actors that must be really hard to pull that off because most of the time that actor has no idea what they’re talking about. I mean not only are they not scientists, but it’s not even real science what they’re saying. In fact that phenomenon was made fun of in the movie Galaxy Quest, where Sigourney Weaver’s character keeps repeating all the technobabble that the computer says back to the crew even when they’re in the middle of a crisis. CLIP The gold standard for good technobabble, I think, is probably this scene from Back to the Future. CLIP Now a Giga-watt is a real thing, but apparently nobody in the cast and crew knew it was pronounced GIG-a-watt. Which made me wonder why does one poorly understood pseudo-scientific term feel right to me and help bolster my suspension of disbelief while I’m watching a movie or TV show, while another technobabble scene does exactly the opposite? To help me figure this out, I decided to turn an expert. Helen Zaltzman. Her podcast The Allusionist is like mine in that it’s relatively short and comes out every other week. But her focus is on language.
    [Show full text]
  • Hooray and Thanks for All the Animal Crackers
    AddendumThe Post Con Report for Norwescon 23 allowed. Brian was so amazed that John Travolta Hooray and was excited to meet him because Brian is just a writer and “he’s John Travolta.” It was really neat to see both of these extremely talented men get excited Thanks For All about meeting each other. It also turned out to be a small world for John and Barclay. It seems that Barclay’s mom has known John for years, she’s his the Animal real estate agent in New York. In the hour that John was at the convention, he was able to sign about 250 items for people. But each person got a moment to Crackers speak with him, which is what he requested. He truly seemed to enjoy speaking with all the fans and they As the Chairman of a convention, you use many with him. yardsticks to measure the success of your conven- There are always so many people to thank after a tion. And no matter which stick I pull out to mea- convention. I’ll try not to droll on too long but there sure Norwescon 23, it was a success. are some very special thank you’s to make. First, I’d First, I would like to thank our Guests of Honor. like to thank my Vice Chair Betty Claar. She is the My gosh! What convention could have had a more Ying to my Yang, and I could have never made it wonderful set of talented and gifted professionals? through the year without her.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Foundations Fear Free Ebook
    FOUNDATIONS FEAR DOWNLOAD FREE BOOK Gregory Benford | 624 pages | 30 May 2000 | HarperCollins Publishers Inc | 9780061056383 | English | New York, NY, United States Foundation's Fear This book Foundations Fear what it sets out to do, namely setup a trilogy of books which will try to answer some of the open questions about the Foundation universe. The Second Foundation Foundations Fear. Apr 23, Mirek. Gregory Benford is an American science fiction author and astrophysicist who is on the faculty of the Department of Physics and Astronomy at the University of California, Irvine. A review Foundations Fear Steven H Silver Advertisement. Feb 19, JBradford rated it Foundations Fear liked it. Second Foundation Trilogy 3 books. Preview — Foundation's Fear by Foundations Fear Benford. Eto Demerzel, aka R. Thank goodness the reviews for the next 2 Foundations Fear are much Foundations Fear -- its the only thing motivating me to continue this series Preceded by: The Robot series and The Empire series. There is a lot of interaction between Hari and Dors, which I enjoyed. So much for the good news. The first part of the book starts out good: it's reminiscent of Asimov's original, the characters are believable, and I was just generally excited about reading more about Seldon. I'll admit that part of my feeling for the novel comes from the fact that I'm not a huge fan of the above-mentioned Foundation novels. Finally, Benford really doesn't have a feel Foundations Fear the characters. Benford was given a tough task: trying Foundations Fear flesh out Hari Seldon's conception of psychohistory.
    [Show full text]
  • Heart of the Comet by David Brin and Gregory Benford David Brin Is The
    Tran DF sfo P rm Y e Y r B 2 B . 0 A Click here to buy w w m w co .A B BYY. Heart of the Comet by David Brin and Gregory Benford David Brin is the Hugo and Nebula award-winning author of ten novels, including the acclaimed Uplift series, and two collections of short stories. He has a doctorate in astrophysics, and has been a consultant to NASA and a graduate level physics professor. He lives in California. Gregory Benford's novels include In the Ocean of Night, Sailing Bright Eternity and Timescape, which won the Nebula Award, the British Science Fiction Award and the John W. Campbell Memorial Award. He is a professor of physics at the University of California, and has served as an adviser to the Department of Energy, NASA, and the White House Council of Space Policy. He lives in California. Praise for Heart of the Comet: 'A literary conjunction of two of the brightest stars in the science-fiction firmament. In Heart of the Comet, we have it all, the techno-props and accurate physics and biology of John W. Campbell, the heroic battles with outrageous monsters of Robert E. Howard, the insights into seething human perversity of J.G. Ballard and Thomas M. Disch, the characterizational depth of Theodore Sturgeon, all of it wrapped in a scientifically plausible and entertaining package that should not be missed. Heart of the Comet should be on everyone's award ballot' Los Angeles Times 'A magnificent effort . their story gets better, and better, and better' Locus 'Tremendously imaginative .
    [Show full text]
  • SFRA Newsletter
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Digital Collection - Science Fiction & Fantasy Digital Collection - Science Fiction & Fantasy Publications 3-1-2005 SFRA ewN sletter 271 Science Fiction Research Association Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/scifistud_pub Part of the Fiction Commons Scholar Commons Citation Science Fiction Research Association, "SFRA eN wsletter 271 " (2005). Digital Collection - Science Fiction & Fantasy Publications. Paper 86. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/scifistud_pub/86 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Digital Collection - Science Fiction & Fantasy at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Digital Collection - Science Fiction & Fantasy Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. #1TI IM./FeII.'lflJfth 1H§ Nonfiction Reriews: Ed McHnliaht Science Fiction Research fiction Reriews: Association Phlillip Snyder The SFRAReview (ISSN III 7HIS ISSUE: 1068-395X) is published four times a year by the Science Fiction Researc:hAs­ SFRA Business sociation (SFRA) and distributed to Editor's Message 2 SFRA members. Individual issues are not President's Message 2 for sale; however, starting with issue #256, all issues will be published to Minutes of the Executive Conference SFRA's website no less than 10 weeks after paper publication. For information Approaches to Teachini ... about the SFRA and its benefits, see the description at the back of this issue. For Le Guln's The Lathe of Heaven & a membership application, contact SFRA Treasurer Dave Mead or get one from Non Fiction Reviews the SFRA website: <www.sfra.org>. SFRA would like to thank the Univer­ A Sense of Wonder I I sity of Wisconsin-Eau Claire for its as­ Gernsback Days 12 sistance in producing the Review.
    [Show full text]