The British Academy Annual Report of the Trustees and Financial Statements
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Review of the Year 2014-2015
INSPIRING EXCELLENCE REVIEW OF THE YEAR 2014/15 British Academy Review of the year 2014/15 1 CONTENTS Our Mission: To inspire, recognise and support high achievement in the humanities and social sciences throughout the UK and internationally, and to champion their role and value. 02 INTRODUCTION 15 STRENGTHENING POLICYMAKING Providing independent contributions 04 THE YEAR IN NUMBERS to public policy development, enhancing the policymaking process. The following sections reflect the six strategic priorities set 17 ENGAGING WITH THE PUBLIC out in the Academy’s Strategic Stimulating public interest in and Framework 2013–2018: understanding of the humanities and social sciences, and contributing 06 CHAMPIONING THE HUMANITIES to public debate. aND SOCIAL SCIENCES 19 PROMOTING INTERNatiONALISM Taking a lead in representing the Promoting UK research in humanities and social sciences, international arenas, fostering a global promoting their interests and approach across UK research and vigorously upholding their value. providing leadership in developing 08 ADVANCING RESEARCH global research links and expertise. Providing distinctive and 22 ABOUT THE ACADEMY complementary funding opportunities for outstanding people and innovative research. 12 FOSTERING EXCELLENCE Strengthening, extending and diversifying ways of recognising and celebrating high achievement in the humanities and social sciences. British Academy Review of the year 2014/15 1 INTRODUCTION This Review of the Year presents a Exemplifying this are the first three series In its policy activities, the Academy has The second, with the Department for summary of highlights from the past of The British Academy Debates. These took carried out highly regarded work on the International Development, will create a year, showing how the British Academy public discussions of a selected theme – UK’s constitution and on the multiple new body of international research on ways Ageing, then Immigration, then Well-being issues surrounding Scottish devolution. -
The British Academy Annual Report of the Trustees and Financial Statements
The British Academy Annual Report of the Trustees and Financial Statements For the year ended 31st March 2021 The British Academy Annual Report 2021 3 Trustees and Principal Advisers Council President as at date of signing Professor Sir David Cannadine Vice–Presidents Professor Sarah Worthington QC Treasurer (retired 23 July 2020) Professor Sally Shuttleworth Treasurer (appointed 23 July 2020) Professor Dominic Abrams Vice President, Social Sciences (retired 23 July 2020) Professor Conor Gearty Vice President, Social Sciences (appointed 23 July 2020) Professor Simon Goldhill Foreign Secretary Professor Aditi Lahiri Vice President, Humanities Professor Simon Swain Vice President, Research and Higher Education Policy Revd Professor Diarmaid MacCulloch Kt Vice President, Public Engagement Professor Genevra Richardson Vice President, Public Policy Professor Hamish Scott Vice President, Publications Professor Charles Tripp Vice President, British International Research Institutes Ordinary Members Professor Isobel Armstrong (appointed 23 July 2020) Professor Simon Keay Professor Julia Barrow (retired 23 July 2020) Professor Tony Manstead Professor Christine Bell (retired 23 July 2020) Professor Jane Millar Professor Sarah Birch Professor Michael Moriarty Registered Charity No. Professor Julian Birkinshaw (retired 23 July 2020) Professor Chakravarthi Ram-Prasad 233176 Professor Joanna Bourke Professor Ingrid De Smet (appointed 23 July 2020) Registered Auditors BDO LLP Professor Dauvit Bron (appointed 23 July 2020) Professor Nicolas Sims-Williams -
The Latin Controversial Dialogues of Late Antiquity Charles Nestor Kuper Bryn Mawr College, [email protected]
Bryn Mawr College Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College Bryn Mawr College Dissertations and Theses 2017 The Latin Controversial Dialogues of Late Antiquity Charles Nestor Kuper Bryn Mawr College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.brynmawr.edu/dissertations Part of the Classics Commons Custom Citation Kuper, Charles N. "The Latin Controversial Dialogues of Late Antiquity." PhD diss., Bryn Mawr College, 2017. This paper is posted at Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College. https://repository.brynmawr.edu/dissertations/170 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Latin Controversial Dialogues of Late Antiquity By Charles Nestor Kuper May 2017 Submitted to the Faculty of Bryn Mawr College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Greek, Latin, and Classical Studies Abstract This dissertation addresses how the literary genre of the philosophical dialogue was used by Latin authors in late antiquity (300–700 AD) to negotiate ongoing anti-heretical debates. ❧ Traditional scholarship on this topic has focused mostly on the Greek dialogues. When the Latin material received attention, it was read in terms of its appropriation of and deviation from classical models. More recent scholarship has acted as a corrective to this model, and one key question that has emerged is whether true dialogue persisted into late antiquity at all. Some scholars have provocatively suggested that the democratic aims of the dialogue are inconsistent with the totalitarian discourse characterized by the Christian Roman Empire. Is late antiquity, in fact, the end of the dialogue? ❧ This thesis is an answer to this ongoing discussion. -
Section Membership
SECTIONS 81 Section membership Fellows are assigned to a ‘Section of primary allegiance’ of their choice. It is possible to belong to more than one Section (cross-membership, by invitation of the Section concerned); this is approved by Council, the members to serve for a period of five years. In the following pages cross-members are listed after primary members, together with their primary Section and the date of appointment. The Emeritus Fellows of each Section are also listed separately. And the primary affiliation of Corresponding Fellows is also indicated. Membership of the Ginger Groups is listed on page 97. * Indicates membership of Section Standing Committee.