1 SOIL VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT 2 AREA, ,

3 ABSTRACT

4 Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System (GIS) integrated with Revised Universal

5 Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) was adopted to estimate the rate of annual soil loss in Afikpo South

6 Local Government. This is important due to the fact that agriculture is the main source of

7 livelihood in the area. The RUSLE factors were computed using data such as rainfall from

8 NIMET, Soil from FAO, elevation from SRTM and Landsat 8 OLI from USGS. The data were

9 used as input in a GIS environment and the annual soil loss was generated using the RUSLE

10 equation. The result shows that the average annual soil loss ranges from 0 to 155,858 ha/ton/yr.

11 It was also observed that soil erosion was predominant in the southern part of Afikpo South LGA

12 due to the presence of steep slopes in the area. The study serves as a preliminary documentation

13 for planning, conservation and management of soil resources in the Local Government.

14 Keywords: Soil Vulnerability, Estimation, RUSLE, Afikpo South, Nigeria

15

16 INTRODUCTION

17 Soil erosion is just the efficient expulsion of soil, including plant nutrients, from the land surface

18 by the different operators of denudation. It happens in several parts of Nigeria under various

19 land, climatic and soil conditions. Be that as it may, the level of event shifts extensively from one

20 part of the nation to the other (Ofomata, 2015). Similarly varied are the components in charge of

21 the commencement and advancement of erosion, just as the sorts that exist in several parts of the

22 country.

1

23 Soil erosion is a major ecological problem in southeast Nigeria (Abegunde et al., 2006). Soil

24 erosion leads to soil deterioration, and this coupled with improper landuse practices becomes

25 increasingly devastating (Feng et al., 2010). Massive and expanding gully erosion are prevalent

26 in five states which include Anambra, Imo, Abia, Ebonyi and . The root causes of the

27 gully erosion are complex with climate change amplifying the challenge (Worldbank, 2013).

28 Erosion menace has destroyed buildings, farmlands, landmarks, ancestral burial sites, economic

29 trees and Social infrastructures. Soil erosion pose a serious threat to food production. In Afikpo

30 South Local Government Area of Ebonyi state, there is decrease in agricultural productivity due

31 to soil erosion effect. The situation has become critical with increase in population, urbanization,

32 deforestation and intensified rainfall. There is a need for policies that encourages soil retention

33 strategies, land improving investments and better land management (Scherr and Yadav, 1997).

34 Causes of gully erosion has been traced to poor land management coupled with lack of

35 innovation and awareness measure (Obidimma and Olorunfemi, 2011).

36 MATERIALS AND METHODS

37 STUDY AREA

38 Afikpo South Local Government Area (LGA) is located between longitude 7°40’ E to 7° 53’ E

39 and latitude 5° 41’ N to 5° 57’ N. Afikpo South is historically known as Edda. It is the homeland

40 of Edda people an Igbo subgroup. It administrative headquarters is at Nguzu Edda. Edda is

41 bordered by Unwana to the east, Akaeze to the west, to the south and Amasiri to the

42 north. The basic occupation in the LGA is farming and fishing. Afikpo South LGA covers a total

43 of 330km2 in area with a population of 157,072 according to the 2006 Nigeria population census.

44 The climate is characterised by two distinct seasons; the dry and rainy season. The rainy season

45 is oppressive and overcast. The dry season is muggy and mostly cloudy. According to Koppen

2

46 and Geiger, the climate of Afikpo is classified as Aw with average temperature of 27.2°C and

47 average annual rainfall of 2022mm. Afikpo South landscape features lush vegetation with

48 parklands and short tress added to a litter of woodlands and forests.

49

50 Figure 1: Map of Afikpo South LGA-Study Location

51 DATA

52 Rainfall data for Afikpo South LGA was acquired from the Nigerian Meteorological Agency

53 (NIMET) for the period of 1985 to 2015. The rainfall data was analysed to derive the average

54 annual rainfall for the LGA.

55 Landsat 8 imagery was acquired from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) imagery

56 distribution platform. The landsat imagery was acquired on 15th of January, 2015. The study area

3

57 was extracted from the large dataset. The imagery was used to generate the vegetation cover for

58 Afikpo South LGA.

59 Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) imagery was acquired from the United States 60 Geological Survey (USGS) distribution platform. The SRTM image was used to delineate the 61 slope length and slope steepness of Afikpo South LGA.

62 Soil data was acquired from the Harmonised World Soil Database (HWSD) by Food Agriculture 63 Organisation (FAO).

64 METHODOLOGY

65 SOIL EROSION MODELLING BY UNIVERSAL SOIL LOSS EQUATION (USLE)

66 The Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) is an empirically based soil erosion model developed 67 by Wischmeier and Smith (1978). The soil loss (A) due to water erosion per unit area per year 68 (Mg ha-1 yr-1) was quantified using USLE following equation:

69 A = R x K x LS x C x P

70 Where A is the average soil loss due to water erosion, R the rainfall and runoff erosivity factor 71 (MJ mm ha-1 h-1 yr-1), K the soil erodibility factor (Mg h MJ-1 mm-1), L the slope length factor 72 (dimensionless), S the slope steepness factor (dimensionless), C the cover and management 73 practice factor (dimensionless), and P the support practice (dimensionless).

74 RAINFALL-RUNOFF EROSIVITY FACTOR (R)

75 The rainfall erosivity factor (R) is a representation of the potential of rainfall to erode soil 76 particles (Renard et al., 1997). The R factor relects the effect of long term average of rainfall 77 intensity on soil erosion [7].

78 SOIL ERODIBILITY FACTOR (K)

79 Soil erodibility factor (K factor) is the soil loss rate per erosion index unit for a specified soil as 80 measured on a standard plot, which is defined as a 72.6ft (22.1m) length of uniform 9% slope in 81 continuous clean-tilled fallow (Ahmad, 2013). Soil erodibility factor measures the susceptibility

4

82 of soil particles or surface materials to transportation and detachment by the amount of rainfall 83 and runoff input [8]. K factor takes into account the integrated effect of rainfall, runoff and 84 infiltration on soil loss [9]. K factor quantifies the cohesive character of a soil type and its 85 resistance to dislodging and transport due to raindrop impact and overland flow shear forces 86 (Tirkey et al., 2013).

87 TOPOGRAPHY FACTOR (LS)

88 L factor is the function of slope length and S factor is the function for slope steepness. The both 89 which is written as LS factor is used to represent the topographical factor effect on soil erosion. 90 The effect of topography on soil loss is accounted for by the LS factor. Slope length is defined as 91 the distance from the point of origin of overland flow to either the point where the slope 92 decreases to the extent that deposition begins or the point where runoff enters well-defined 93 channels [7]. The slope length factor determines the concentration of water. The greater the slope 94 length of a field, the greater the concentration of water and run off (Nnabugwu and Ibeabuchi, 95 2015).

96 COVER MANAGEMENT FACTOR (C)

97 The cover and management factor indicates how vegetation cover, cropping and management 98 practices affect soil erodibility. Cover Management Factor (C) is the ratio of soil loss from a 99 particular site with a specified cover and management to soil loss from a standard unit plot [9]. 100 This simply means the ratio of soil loss of a specific crop to the soil loss under the condition of 101 continuous bare fallow [8]. This value includes the effects of cover, crop sequence, productivity 102 level, length of growing season, tillage practices, residue management, and the expected time 103 distribution of erosive rainstorms.

104 CONSERVATION PRACTICE FACTOR (P)

105 Support practice factor is the soil loss ratio with a specific support practice to the corresponding 106 soil loss with up and down slope tillage [8]. Farmers tend to plough their farmlands without 107 engaging in soil conservation practices such as contouring, stipping and terracing and this leads 108 to higher P value. Lower P values would be attained if conservation practices are been carried 109 out by farmers. These practices principally affect erosion by modifying the flow pattern, grade,

5

110 or direction of surface runoff and by reducing the amount and rate of runoff (Nwakor et al., 111 2015).

112 Rainfall Rainfall Raster R 113

114

115

116

117 Landsat 8 Vegetation Cover C Image 118

119

120 Soil Loss 121 SRTM Image Slope Contributing areas 122 and steepness LS

123 Stream

124

125 P 126

Soil Map Soil Erodibility raster 127 K

128

129 Figure 2: RUSLE Flow Chart

130 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

131 RUSLE EROSION MODELLING

6

132 RAINFALL-RUNOFF EROSIVITY FACTOR (R)

133 NIMET precipitation data for 1985 – 2015 was acquired for Afikpo South LGA. The average 134 precipitation was calculated for the 30 years period. The average precipitation in Afikpo South 135 LGA for the 30 years period is 2385.39mm. The calculated average precipitation value was fitted 136 into the R factor formula:

137 R = 0.5 * P * 1.73 (in Metric unit) (Roose (1975)

138 The R factor was calculated as 2063.36 and this represents the rainfall regime within Ebonyi

139 state.

140 SOIL ERODIBILITY FACTOR (K)

141 The soil types identified within the Afikpo South LGA includes; Dystric Nitosols and Dystric 142 Gleysols. The soil properties were used to classify and compute the erodibility factor within the 143 study area. Table 1 shows the K factor each soil type in Afikpo South Local Government. Figure 144 3 shows the map of K factor for each soil type. The K factor is computed with the following 145 equation:

146 K = 27.66m1.14 x 10-8 x (12-a) + 0.0043 x (b-2) + 0.0033 x (c-3)

147 Where;

148 K = Soil erodobility factor (ton/hr/haMJmm)

149 m = (Silt% + Sand%) x (100 – clay%)

150 a = % organic matter

151 b = structure code: 1) very structured or particulate, 2) fairly structured, 3) slightly structured and

152 4) solid.

7

153 c = profile permeability code: 1) rapid, 2) moderated to rapid, 3) moderate, 4) moderated to slow,

154 5) slow, 6) very slow

155 Table 1: shows the K factor for each soil type in Ebonyi State:

SOIL TYPE K FACTOR

Dystric Nitosols 0.9

Dystric Gleysols 0.0007

156

157

158 Figure 3: Map of K factor

159 TOPOGRAPHY FACTOR (LS)

8

160 The steepness factor (S factor) accounts for the influence of slope steepness or elevation on

161 erosion. The steeper and longer the slope, the higher is the risk for erosion. The combined effect

162 of slope length and steepness gives the rate of soil erosion. Figure 4 shows the map LS factor.

163 The map indicates that the slope steepness are dominant in the southern parts of Afikpo South

164 LGA.

165

166 Figure 4: Map showing LS factor

167 Cover Management Factor (C)

168 C factor is shows the relationship between erosion on bare soil and erosion observed under a

169 cropping system. It expresses the protection of soil by cover type and density (Yahya et al.,

9

170 2013). The C factor was generated using NDVI, a vegetation health indicator, in the following

171 equation;

172

173 Where α and β are unit-less parameters that determine the shape of the curve relating to NDVI

174 and the C Factor. This scaling approach gives a better result than assuming a linear relationship

175 and the values of 2 and 1 were selected for the parameters α and β respectively (Van der Knijff et

176 al., 2000). The generated C factor ranges between 0.9 and 0.34. Figure 5 shows the map of C

177 factor.

178

10

179 Figure 5: Map of C factor

180

181 CONSERVATION PRACTICE FACTOR (P)

182 P factor accounts for soil loss when specific management practices are carried out. The P value

183 for Afikpo South LGA was set at 1 since there are no specified management practices used in the

184 region.

185 SOIL LOSS

186 Figure 6 shows the amount of soil loss in tonnes per hectares per year in Afikpo South LGA. The

187 soil erosion in Afikpo South LGA is spread in patches across the LGA area. The northern part

188 experiences lesser erosion activities. Soil erosion was more prevalent in the southern part of the

189 LGA. The soil loss ranges from 0 to as high as 155,858 ha/ton/yr. Figure 7 show the erosion risk

190 Afikpo South LGA. The erosion risk was classified into three; low, medium and high. Low risk

191 covers an area of 297.92km2, medium risk covers an area of 29.15km2 and high risk covers an

192 area of 2.14km2.

11

193

194

195 Figure 6: Map of soil loss in Afikpo South LGA

12

196

197 Figure 7: Afikpo South LGA Soil Erosion Risk Map

198 CONCLUSION

199 Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System (GIS) integrated with the Revised

200 Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) were applied in this study to predict the annual average

201 soil loss rate in Afikpo South Local Government Area, Nigeria. This process can serve as a first

202 step to identifying and mapping of land degradation and its effect. Soil erosion is a major

203 environmental challenge in Afikpo South Local Government area where agriculture is the source

204 of livelihood. Mapping of soil loss in this area is necessary for planning and management of soil

205 resources in the Local Government. The study result indicates that soil erosion was prevalent in

206 the southern part of the local government. In the northern part, there were scattered patches of

13

207 high and medium risk soil erosion zones. Low soil erosion risk area covers 90.5% of the area,

208 medium soil erosion risk area covers 8.8% of the area and High soil erosion risk covers 0.7% of

209 the total area. It was observed that soil erosion were prevalent in the southern part of the Local

210 Government Area due to the presence of steep slopes which are predominant in the south.

211 REFERENCES

212 [1] Ofomata, G.E.K, Soil Erosion in Nigeria: The Views of a Geomorphologist 2015, 09. 7th 213 Inaugural Lecture of the University of Nigeria, . Available at www.unn.edu.ng/wp- 214 content/uploads/2015/09/No-7-Inaugral-Lecture.pdf 215 [2] Abegunde A.A., Adeyinka S.A., Olawuni P.O. and Olufunmilayo A.O. An Assessment of the 216 Socio Economic Impacts of Soil Erosion in South Eastern Nigeria. TS S6 – Special Valuation 217 Situations. Shaping the Change, XXIII FIG Congress, Munich, Germany, October 8 -13, 2006, 218 1-15 219 [3] Feng X.M., Wang Y.F., Chen L.D., Fu B.J. and Bai G.S. Modelling Soil Erosion and Its 220 Response to Land-use Change in Hilly Catchments of the Chinese Loess Plateau, 221 Geomorphology, 2010; 118, 239 – 248. 222 [4] Worldbank. Combating Erosion in Nigeria: New Project Spells Hope in Seven States. 2013. 223 http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2013/11/26/combating-erosion-in_nigeria new- 224 project-spells-hope-in-seven-states. (Accessed on 02/07/2018). 225 [5] Scherr S.J. and Yadav S. Land Degradation in the Developing World: Issues and Policy 226 Options for 2020. IFPRI, Washington. 1997, IFPRI 2020 Brief no. 44. 1-98 227 [6] Obidimma C.E. and Olorunfemi A. Resolving the Gully Erosion Problem in Southeastern 228 Nigeria: Innovation Through Public Awareness and Community-Based Approaches. Journal of 229 Soil Sciences and Environmental Management, 2011; Vol. 2(10), pp. 286-291, 230 [7] Wischmeier, W.H and Smith, D.D. Predicting rainfall erosion losses. Agriculture Handbook 231 1978, no. 537, USDA Science and Education Adminstration. 232 [8] Renard K., Foster G., Weesies G., McDool D. and Yoder D. Predicting Soil Erosion by 233 Water: A Guide to Conservation Planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation 234 (RUSLE). Agricultural Handbook. 1997, 703, USDA-ARS.

14

235 [9] Ahmad S.S. Erosion Mapping and Sediment Yield of the Kabul River Basin, Afghanistan. 236 2013, Colorado State University. 237 [10] Tirkey, A., Pandey, A.C., Nathawat, M.S. Use of Satellite Data, GIS and RUSLE for 238 Estimation of Average Annual Soil Loss in Daltonganj Watershed of Jharkhand (India). Journal 239 of Remote Sensing Technology, 2013, Vol. 1 Issue 1, PP. 20-30. 240 [11] Nnabugwu O. U and Ibeabuchi, U. Mapping Gully Erosion in , Nigeria Using 241 Geographical Information System (GIS) and Remote Sensing Techniques. Journal of Soil 242 Science and Environmental Management, 2015, ISSN 2141-2391 243 [12] Nwakor E.K., Mbajiorgu C.C. and Ogbu K.N. Assessment of Soil Erosion Using RUSLE2 244 Model and GIS in Upper Ebonyi River Watershrd, , Nigeria. International Journal of 245 Remote Sensing & Geoscience. 2015, ISSN No: 2319-3484, Volume 4. 246 [13] Roose E.J. Erosion et Ruisellement en Afrique de l’ouest: Vingt Annies de Measures en

247 Petites Parcelles experimentales. Cyclo. 1975, ORSTOM, Adiopodoume, Ivory Coast.

248 [14] Yahya, F., Dalal, Z. and Ibrahim, F. Spatial Estimation of Soil Erosion Risk Using RUSLE 249 Approach, RS and GIS techniques: A Case Study of Kufranja Watershed, Northern Jordan. 250 Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 2013, 5, 1247 – 1261. 251 [15] Van der Knijff M., Jones J.A. and Montanarella L. Soil Erosion Risk Assessment in 252 Europe.Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 2000, 34pp. 253 254

255

256

257

15