DOCSLIB.ORG

Database Description and Users Manual Version 3.0 for Phase 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The Forest Inventory and Analysis Database: Database Description and Users Manual Version 3.0 for Phase 2 Forest Inventory and Analysis Program U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service 2 FIA Database Description and Users Guide, version 3.0, revision 1 Foreword July, 2008 Foreword Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) is a continuing endeavor mandated by Congress in the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act of 1974 and the McSweeney-McNary Forest Research Act of 1928. FIA's primary objective is to determine the extent, condition, volume, growth, and depletions of timber on the Nation's forest land. Before 1999, all inventories were conducted on a periodic basis. With the passage of the 1998 Farm Bill, FIA is required to collect data on plots annually within each State. This kind of up-to-date information is essential to frame realistic forest policies and programs. USDA Forest Service regional research stations are responsible for conducting these inventories and publishing summary reports for individual States. In addition to published reports, the Forest Service can also provide data collected in each inventory to those interested in further analysis. This report describes a standard format in which data can be obtained. This standard format, referred to as the Forest Inventory and Analysis Database (FIADB) structure, was developed to provide users with as much data as possible in a consistent manner among States. FIADB files can be obtained for any State inventory conducted after 1988 (Eastern U.S.) or 1994 (Western U.S.). Files for many State inventories conducted before this time may also be available; however, some data fields may be empty or the items may have been collected or computed differently. Annual inventories use a common plot design and common data collection procedures nationwide, resulting in greater consistency among FIA units than earlier inventories. Data field definitions note inconsistencies caused by different sampling designs and processing methods. 3 FIA Database Description and Users Guide, version 3.0, revision 1 Table of Contents July, 2008 Foreword.................................................................................................................................... 3 Chapter 1 -- Introduction ........................................................................................................... 6 Purpose of this Manual........................................................................................................... 6 The FIA Program.................................................................................................................... 6 The FIA Database................................................................................................................... 8 Chapter 2 -- FIA Sampling and Estimation Procedures ............................................................ 9 Sampling and Stratification Methodology ............................................................................. 9 Plot Location .......................................................................................................................... 9 Plot Design, Condition Delineation, and Types of Data Attributes..................................... 11 Types of Attributes............................................................................................................... 12 Expansion factors ................................................................................................................. 13 Accuracy Standards.............................................................................................................. 14 Chapter 3 -- Database Structure............................................................................................... 15 Table Descriptions................................................................................................................ 15 Keys Presented with the Tables ........................................................................................... 18 Data Storage and Format...................................................................................................... 19 Survey Table (Oracle table name is SURVEY) ................................................................... 20 County Table (Oracle table name is COUNTY).................................................................. 23 Plot Table (Oracle table name is PLOT).............................................................................. 25 Subplot Table (Oracle table name is SUBPLOT) ................................................................ 36 Condition Table (Oracle table name is COND) ................................................................... 41 Subplot Condition Table (Oracle table name is SUBP_COND).......................................... 68 Tree Table (Oracle table name is TREE) ............................................................................. 72 Seedling Table (Oracle table name is SEEDLING)........................................................... 102 Site Tree Table (Oracle table name is SITETREE) ........................................................... 106 Boundary Table (Oracle table name is BOUNDARY)...................................................... 112 Population Evaluation Group Table (Oracle table name is POP_EVAL_GRP)................ 116 Population Evaluation Table (Oracle table name is POP_EVAL)..................................... 120 Population Estimation Unit Table (Oracle table name is POP_ESTN_UNIT).................. 122 Population Stratum Table (Oracle table name is POP_STRATUM)................................. 125 Population Plot Stratum Assignment Table (Oracle table name is POP_PLOT_STRATUM_ASSGN) ................................................................................... 128 Population Attribute Table (Oracle table name is POP_ATTRIBUTE) ............................ 131 Population Evaluation Attribute Table (Oracle table name is POP_EVAL_ATTRIBUTE)............................................................................ 133 Chapter 4 – Calculating Population Estimates and Their Associated Sampling Errors........ 135 Acknowledgments ................................................................................................................. 156 Literature Cited...................................................................................................................... 157 Appendix A. Index of Column Names .................................................................................. 159 Appendix B. Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) Design Codes and Definitions by Region.......................................................................................................... 173 Appendix C. State, Survey Unit, and County Codes............................................................. 180 Appendix D. Forest Type Codes And Names ....................................................................... 222 Appendix E. Administrative National Forest Codes And Names ......................................... 224 Appendix F. Tree Species Codes, Names, And Occurrences................................................ 226 4 FIA Database Description and Users Guide, version 3.0, revision 1 Table of Contents July, 2008 Appendix G. Tree Species Group Codes............................................................................... 236 Appendix H. Damage Agent codes for PNW........................................................................ 237 Appendix I. FIA Inventories by State, Year, and Type......................................................... 242 5 FIA Database Description and Users Guide, version 3.0, revision 1 Chapter 1 July, 2008 Chapter 1 -- Introduction Purpose of this Manual This manual is the definitive guide to the Forest Inventory and Analysis database (FIADB). This document replaces General Technical Report NC-218 (Miles and others 2001), which covered Version 1.0 of the FIADB, and subsequent updates that appeared as online documentation to the FIADB through Version 2.1. Although it is used widely within the Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program, a substantial part, if not the majority, of the intended audience includes those outside FIA who are interested in using FIA data for their own analyses. Awareness of the potential uses of FIA data by users outside the FIA community is growing, and the data become increasingly useful as additional data are collected. However, as is the case with any data source, it is incumbent upon the user to understand not only the data definitions and acquisition methods, but also the context in which the data were collected. This manual is intended to help current and potential users understand the necessary details of the FIADB. This manual has four chapters. The remainder of chapter 1 includes general introductions to the FIA program and the FIA database, including brief histories of both. It provides a convenient overview for those who have an interest in using FIA data, but have not yet become familiar with the FIA program. Chapter 2 provides descriptions of FIA sampling methods, including plot location and design, data measurement and computation, and general estimation procedures. Chapter 3 describes the tables that comprise the database, the attributes stored in each table, and the linkages between tables. Descriptions of the attributes, their data format, valid values, and other important details are given, but the appropriate field manuals should
Recommended publications
  • Yellowstone National Park, Resources and Issues, Vegetation

    Yellowstone National Park, Resources and Issues, Vegetation

    VEGETATION More than 1,300 plant taxa occur in Yellowstone National Park. The whitebark pine, shown here and found in high elevations in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, is an important native species in decline. Vegetation The vegetation communities of Yellowstone National major disturbances. Yellowstone is home to three Park include overlapping combinations of species endemic plant species, at least two of which depend typical of the Rocky Mountains as well as of the on the unusual habitat created by the park’s thermal Great Plains to the east and the Intermountain region features. Most vegetation management in the park to the west. The exact vegetation community pres- is focused on minimizing human-caused impacts on ent in any area of the park reflects the consequences their native plant communities to the extent feasible. of the underlying geology, ongoing climate change, substrates and soils, and disturbances created by fire, Vegetation Communities floods, landslides, blowdowns, insect infestations, There are several vegetation communities in and the arrival of nonnative plants. Yellowstone: higher- and lower-elevation forests Today, the roughly 1,386 native taxa in the park and the understory vegetation associated with them, represent the species able to either persist in the area sagebrush-steppe, wetlands, and hydrothermal. or recolonize after glaciers, lava flows, and other Quick Facts Number in Yellowstone • Three endemic species (found only Management Issues Native plant taxa: more than 1,300: in Yellowstone): Ross’s bentgrass, • Controlling nonnative species, • Hundreds of wildfowers. Yellowstone sand verbena, which threaten native species, Yellowstone sulfur wild buckwheat. especially near developed areas; • Trees: nine conifers (lodgepole some are spreading into the Nonnative plant species: 225.
  • Sustaining America's Urban Trees and Forests

    Sustaining America's Urban Trees and Forests

    United States Department of SSustainingustaining AAmerica’smerica’s Agriculture Forest Service UUrbanrban TTreesrees andand ForestsForests Northern Research Station State and Private Forestry General Technical DDavidavid J.J. NNowak,owak, SusanSusan M.M. Stein,Stein, PaulaPaula B.B. Randler,Randler, EricEric J.J. GreenGreenfi eeld,ld, Report NRS-62 SSaraara JJ.. CComas,omas, MMaryary AA.. CCarr,arr, aandnd RRalphalph J.J. AligAlig June 2010 A Forests on the Edge Report ABSTRACT Nowak, David J.; Stein, Susan M.; Randler, Paula B.; Greenfi eld, Eric J.; Comas, Sara J.; Carr, Mary A.; Alig, Ralph J. 2010. Sustaining America’s urban trees and forests: a Forests on the Edge report. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-62. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station. 27 p. Close to 80 percent of the U.S. population lives in urban areas and depends on the essential ecological, economic, and social benefi ts provided by urban trees and forests. However, the distribution of urban tree cover and the benefi ts of urban forests vary across the United States, as do the challenges of sustaining this important resource. As urban areas expand across the country, the importance of the benefi ts that urban forests provide, as well as the challenges to their conservation and maintenance, will increase. The purpose of this report is to provide an overview of the current status and benefi ts of America’s urban forests, compare differences in urban forest canopy cover among regions, and discuss challenges facing urban forests and their implications for urban forest management. Key Words: Urban forest, urbanization, land Lisa DeJong The Plain Dealer, Photo: AP management, ecosystem services Urban forests offer aesthetic values and critical services.
  • Scientific Name Species Common Name Abies Lasiocarpa FIR Subalpine Acacia Macracantha ACACIA Long-Spine

    Scientific Name Species Common Name Abies Lasiocarpa FIR Subalpine Acacia Macracantha ACACIA Long-Spine

    Scientific Name Species Common Name Abies lasiocarpa FIR Subalpine Acacia macracantha ACACIA Long-spine Acacia roemeriana CATCLAW Roemer Acer grandidentatum MAPLE Canyon Acer nigrum MAPLE Black Acer platanoides MAPLE Norway Acer saccharinum MAPLE Silver Aesculus pavia BUCKEYE Red Aesculus sylvatica BUCKEYE Painted Ailanthus altissima AILANTHUS Tree-of-heaven Albizia julibrissin SILKTREE Mimosa Albizia lebbek LEBBEK Lebbek Alnus iridis ssp. sinuata ALDER Sitka Alnus maritima ALDER Seaside Alvaradoa amorphoides ALVARADOA Mexican Amelanchier laevis SERVICEBERRY Allegheny Amyris balsamifera TORCHWOOD Balsam Annona squamosa SUGAR-APPLE NA Araucaria cunninghamii ARAUCARIA Cunningham Arctostaphylos glauca MANZANITA Bigberry Asimina obovata PAWPAW Bigflower Bourreria radula STRONGBACK Rough Brasiliopuntia brasiliensis PRICKLY-PEAR Brazilian Bursera simaruba GUMBO-LIMBO NA Caesalpinia pulcherrima FLOWERFENCE NA Capparis flexuosa CAPERTREE Limber CRUCIFIXION- Castela emoryi THORN NA Casuarina equisetifolia CASUARINA Horsetail Ceanothus arboreus CEANOTHUS Feltleaf Ceanothus spinosus CEANOTHUS Greenbark Celtis lindheimeri HACKBERRY Lindheimer Celtis occidentalis HACKBERRY Common Cephalanthus occidentalis BUTTONBUSH Common Cercis canadensis REDBUD Eastern Cercocarpus traskiae CERCOCARPUS Catalina Chrysophyllum oliviforme SATINLEAF NA Citharexylum berlandieri FIDDLEWOOD Berlandier Citrus aurantifolia LIME NA Citrus sinensis ORANGE Orange Coccoloba uvifera SEAGRAPE NA Colubrina arborescens COLUBRINA Coffee Colubrina cubensis COLUBRINA Cuba Condalia globosa
  • FPS Sitegrid Methods for Forest Inventory, Forest Growth and Forest Planning

    FPS Sitegrid Methods for Forest Inventory, Forest Growth and Forest Planning

    FPS SiteGrid Methods for Forest Inventory, Forest Growth And Forest Planning Extract from The Forester’s Guidebook December 14, 2015 by James D. Arney, Ph.D. Forest Biometrics Research Institute 4033 SW Canyon Road Portland, Oregon 97221 (503) 227-0622 www.forestbiometrics.org Information contained in this document is subject to change without notice and does not represent a commitment on behalf of the Forest Biometrics Research Institute, Portland, Oregon. No part of this document may be transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, without the expressed written permission of the Forest Biometrics Research Institute, 4033 SW Canyon Road, Portland, Oregon 97221. Copyright 2010 – 2015 Forest Biometrics Research Institute. All rights reserved worldwide. Printed in the United States. Forest Biometrics Research Institute (FBRI) is an IRS 501 (c) 3 tax-exempt public research corporation dedicated to research, education and service to the forest industry. Forest Projection and Planning System (FPS) is a registered trademark of Forest Biometrics Research Institute (FBRI), Portland, Oregon. Microsoft Access is a registered trademark of Microsoft Corporation. Windows and Windows 7 are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation. Open Database Connectivity (ODBC) is a registered trademark of Microsoft Corporation. ArcMap is a registered trademark of the Environmental Services Research Institute. MapInfo Professional is a registered trademark of MapInfo Corporation. Stand Visualization System (SVS) is a product of the USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. Trademark names are used editorially, to the benefit of the trademark owner, with no intent to infringe on the Trademark. Technical Support: Telephone: (406) 541-0054 Forest Biometrics Research Institute Corporate: (503) 227-0622 URL: http://www.forestbiometrics.org e-mail: [email protected] Access: 08:00-16:00 PST Monday to Friday ii FBRI – FPS Forester’s SiteGrid 2015 Background of Author: In summary, Dr.
  • Article 3 Definitions

    Article 3 Definitions

    1 Commentary is for information only. Proposed new language is double-underlined; Proposed deleted language is stricken. ORDINANCE NO. XX AMENDMENTS TO VOLUME 3 DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE GRESHAM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN, REGARDING THE DEVELOPMENT CODE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT-6 TREE CODE UPDATE THE CITY OF GRESHAM DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS Section 1. Volume 3, Section 3.0100 is amended as follows: Proposed Text Amendment Commentary ARTICLE 3 DEFINITIONS 3.0150 Tree Related Terms and Definitions [3.01]-1 *** ” D. Tree Related Terms and Definitions. Section 3.0150 *** Buffer Tree – See Tree [3.01]-2 - [3.01]-6 *** Tree Caliper – See Tree *** Clear Cutting – See Tree Related Section 3.0150 Definitions, *** Critical Root Zone – See Tree Related Definitions, Section 3.0150 Crosswalk *** Crown Cover – See Tree Related Definitions, Section 3.0150 *** Diameter Breast Height – See Tree Related Definitions, Section 3.0150 *** DRAFT - City of Gresham Development Code (10/29/14 open house review) 2 Dripline – See Tree Related Section 3.0150 Definitions, *** Major Tree – See Tree *** Hazardous Tree – See Tree *** Hogan Cedar Tree – See Tree *** Imminent Hazard Tree – See *** Tree *** Pruning – See Tree Related Definitions, Section 3.0150 *** Regulated Tree – See Tree *** Ornamental Tree – See Tree *** – See Tree Parking Lot Tree *** Perimeter Tree – See Tree *** Severe Crown Reduction – See Tree Related Definitions, Section 3.0150 *** Shade Tree – See Tree *** Significant Tree, Significant Grove – See Tree *** Stand - See Tree Related Definitions, Section
  • Site Potential Tree Heights WP

    Site Potential Tree Heights WP

    WHITE PAPER F14-SO-WP-SILV-33 Site Potential Tree Height Estimates for the Pomeroy and Walla Walla Ranger Districts 1 David C. Powell and Betsy Kaiser, Silviculturists Supervisor’s Office; Pendleton, OR Initial Version: NOVEMBER 2006 Most Recent Revision: FEBRUARY 2017 CONTENTS Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 2 Analysis assumptions ...................................................................................................................... 2 Table 1: Source of site index curves for tree species of the Umatilla National Forest ............ 3 Data Sources ................................................................................................................................... 4 Figure 1 – Location and distribution of CVS plots, and river and stream segments ................ 5 Analysis Methodology ..................................................................................................................... 6 Results ............................................................................................................................................. 6 Table 2 – Site index measurements for CVS site trees within buffered stream areas ............. 8 Table 3 – CVS site trees not used in the site potential tree height analysis ........................... 15 References ...................................................................................................................................
  • Guide Alaska Trees

    Guide Alaska Trees

    x5 Aá24ftL GUIDE TO ALASKA TREES %r\ UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE Agriculture Handbook No. 472 GUIDE TO ALASKA TREES by Leslie A. Viereck, Principal Plant Ecologist Institute of Northern Forestry Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station ÜSDA Forest Service, Fairbanks, Alaska and Elbert L. Little, Jr., Chief Dendrologist Timber Management Research USD A Forest Service, Washington, D.C. Agriculture Handbook No. 472 Supersedes Agriculture Handbook No. 5 Pocket Guide to Alaska Trees United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Washington, D.C. December 1974 VIERECK, LESLIE A., and LITTLE, ELBERT L., JR. 1974. Guide to Alaska trees. U.S. Dep. Agrie., Agrie. Handb. 472, 98 p. Alaska's native trees, 32 species, are described in nontechnical terms and illustrated by drawings for identification. Six species of shrubs rarely reaching tree size are mentioned briefly. There are notes on occurrence and uses, also small maps showing distribution within the State. Keys are provided for both summer and winter, and the sum- mary of the vegetation has a map. This new Guide supersedes *Tocket Guide to Alaska Trees'' (1950) and is condensed and slightly revised from ''Alaska Trees and Shrubs" (1972) by the same authors. OXFORD: 174 (798). KEY WORDS: trees (Alaska) ; Alaska (trees). Library of Congress Catalog Card Number î 74—600104 Cover: Sitka Spruce (Picea sitchensis)., the State tree and largest in Alaska, also one of the most valuable. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402—Price $1.35 Stock Number 0100-03308 11 CONTENTS Page List of species iii Introduction 1 Studies of Alaska trees 2 Plan 2 Acknowledgments [ 3 Statistical summary .
  • Sass Forestecomgt 2018.Pdf

    Sass Forestecomgt 2018.Pdf

    Forest Ecology and Management 419–420 (2018) 31–41 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Forest Ecology and Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foreco Lasting legacies of historical clearcutting, wind, and salvage logging on old- T growth Tsuga canadensis-Pinus strobus forests ⁎ Emma M. Sassa, , Anthony W. D'Amatoa, David R. Fosterb a Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA b Harvard Forest, Harvard University, 324 N Main St, Petersham, MA 01366, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Disturbance events affect forest composition and structure across a range of spatial and temporal scales, and Coarse woody debris subsequent forest development may differ after natural, anthropogenic, or compound disturbances. Following Compound disturbance large, natural disturbances, salvage logging is a common and often controversial management practice in many Forest structure regions of the globe. Yet, while the short-term impacts of salvage logging have been studied in many systems, the Large, infrequent natural disturbance long-term effects remain unclear. We capitalized on over eighty years of data following an old-growth Tsuga Pine-hemlock forests canadensis-Pinus strobus forest in southwestern New Hampshire, USA after the 1938 hurricane, which severely Pit and mound structures damaged forests across much of New England. To our knowledge, this study provides the longest evaluation of salvage logging impacts, and it highlights developmental trajectories for Tsuga canadensis-Pinus strobus forests under a variety of disturbance histories. Specifically, we examined development from an old-growth condition in 1930 through 2016 across three different disturbance histories: (1) clearcut logging prior to the 1938 hurricane with some subsequent damage by the hurricane (“logged”), (2) severe damage from the 1938 hurricane (“hurricane”), and (3) severe damage from the hurricane followed by salvage logging (“salvaged”).
  • Site Basic Report 7/11/2006

    Site Basic Report 7/11/2006

    Site Basic Report 7/11/2006 Site Code BCD S.USIDHP*688 Site Class Standard site Name DOME LAKE Defining Managed Area DOME LAKE RNA State/Province Idaho Directions Dome Lake RNA lies at the northern end of the Bighorn Crags in the Salmon River Mountains, about 3 miles (4.8 km) south of the Salmon River, at a point about 17 miles (27.5 km) southwest of Shoup. | Access to the RNA is possible via several routes, none of which are quick and easy. One route follows: From the town of North Fork, head west on the Salmon River Road 033 for about 36 miles (58 km). The western trailhead for FS Trail 172 is on the south side of the Salmon River between river miles 201 and 202 (opposite of Colson Creek RNA), just west of the junction with FS Road 123 (Colson Creek Road). From the trailhead, FS Trail 172 heads south, switchbacking up the ridge west of Shell Creek and gaining about 5000 feet (1524 m) in elevation over about three air miles (4.8 km) as it climbs to an area just below the Horse Heaven Lookout. Just southeast of the lookout, FS Trail 172 joins the ridgeline that defines the western boundary of the RNA. Other routes include FS Trail 021 from Crags Campground, approximately a 10 mile hike (16 km), and the eastern trailhead of 172 which leaves from near the junction of the Salmon River Road 033 and Panther Creek Road 055. Minimum Elevation: 4,700 Feet 1,433 Meters Maximum Elevation: 9,316 Feet 2,840 Meters Site Description Dome Lake RNA contains the entire upper portion of the Lake Creek watershed.
  • LAND USE PLANNING NOTES Number 3 April 1998 Updated for Clarity April 2010

    LAND USE PLANNING NOTES Number 3 April 1998 Updated for Clarity April 2010

    LAND USE PLANNING NOTES Number 3 April 1998 Updated for Clarity April 2010 PURPOSE: These technical notes have been developed by the Oregon Department of Forestry (ODF) to help landowners and local governments when they must use an alternative to the USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) Soil Survey or other established data sources to determine the productivity of forestland. Under Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR) 660-006-0005, where sources of data referenced in the rule are not available or are shown to be inaccurate, an alternative method for determining productivity that provides equivalent data may be used. These notes describe the methodologies that the Department of Forestry approves, provides information necessary to use the methodologies and gives direction to counties in evaluating forest productivity reports. Background information is also included to answer commonly-asked questions about forest productivity rating systems. These technical notes and the related tables can be found on the Oregon Department of Forestry’s website at: http://egov.oregon.gov/ODF/STATE_FORESTS/FRP/RP_Home.shtml#Land_Use_Planning. Please note the Department of Forestry does not measure forest site productivity for landowners. The Department’s involvement is focused on establishing a list of approved data sources and methodologies other than those cited in the administrative rule. The Department of Forestry will not issue findings on whether these data sources or alternate methodologies have been employed correctly or if the resulting forest site productivity determinations are accurate. The Department of Forestry is not responsible for verifying field measurements. Included on page 9 of this guide is a flowchart, which provides a visual aid for counties to step through the process of determining site productivity.
  • SC Trees & Shrubs

    SC Trees & Shrubs

    Alaska Department of Natural Resources / Division of Forestry / Community Forestry Program 550 W. 7th Ave., Ste. 1450 / Anchorage, AK 99501 / 269-8466 / http://forestry.alaska.gov/community Trees & Shrubs for South Central Alaska The following trees and shrubs are growing successfully in south central Alaska. Each has specific requirements and should be planted where conditions and space allow it to be healthy and safe. For a complete list of plants, descriptions, limitations, requirements, and hardiness, see www.alaskaplants.org. For information on selecting and planting trees, see http://forestry.alaska.gov/community/publications.htm. Deciduous Trees Acer glabrum var. douglasii – Douglas maple Acer negundo – Boxelder Acer platanoides – Norway maple Acer rubrum – Red maple Acer tataricum var. ginnala – Amur maple Betula papyrifera – Paper birch Betula pendula – European white birch Crataegus – Hawthorn Fraxinus manshurica – Manchurian ash Fraxinus nigra – Black ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica – Green ash Larix – Larch, tamarack Malus – Apple, crabapple Populus balsamifera – Balsam poplar Populus tremula – Swedish columnar aspen Populus tremuloides, Aspen Populus trichocarpa – Cottonwood Prunus cerasus ‘Evans’ – Cherry Prunus maackii – Amur chokecherry Prunus pennsylvanica – Pin cherry Pyrus ussuriensis – Ussurian pear Quercus macrocarpa – Bur oak Sorbus aucuparia – Mountainash Syringa reticulata – Japanese tree lilac Tilia Americana – American linden, basswood Tilia cordata - Littleleaf linden Evergreen Tree Abies concolor – White fir Abies
  • TREES AS CROPS in ALASKA PROFILE with an EMPHASIS on SPRUCE Revised 2009

    TREES AS CROPS in ALASKA PROFILE with an EMPHASIS on SPRUCE Revised 2009

    TREES AS CROPS IN ALASKA PROFILE WITH AN EMPHASIS ON SPRUCE Revised 2009 Robert A. Wheeler Thomas R. Jahns Janice I. Chumley PRODUCTION FACTS Growing trees in Alaska can be difficult. This document addresses basic questions regarding growing tree seedlings as an agricultural crop. Whether growing a few seedlings or thousands, many of the basic production questions are the same. From the standpoint of tree seedling production there are three basic regions in Alaska: Southeast, South Central, and the Interior. Producing high quality tree seedlings is 4-H Tree Sale in Soldotna, AK May 2003 achievable in all three regions however care must (photo/Bob Wheeler). be taken to match tree species requirements with local environmental conditions. Through the efforts of the University of Alaska Fairbanks and the Agriculture and Forestry Experiment Station, many tree species have been evaluated over the past 100 years for their performance. Results from these species trials have led to the listing of tree species, growth characteristics, and site requirements found in Table 1. DEMAND Interest in tree production can vary from growing trees for your yard or property to full scale outdoor or greenhouse, bareroot, or container nurseries. Tree planting and tree sales continue to be of considerable interest to the public although there are no large-scale commercial tree nurseries currently operating in Alaska. A state tree nursery was once operated in the Matanuska Valley area, but it has been closed. Reasons for the closure were based upon the high cost of producing seedlings in Alaska versus what it would cost to import them from nurseries outside the state and also, the overall operational difficulties and risks associated with an Alaska nursery program.