DOCSLIB.ORG

John Durie (1596–1680): Defragmenter of the Reformation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

7. Jahrgang MBS TEXTE 148 2010 George M. Ella John Durie (1596–1680): Defragmenter of the Reformation BUCER IN S T E M R A I N M A R 2 1 : E P 4 H ReformedReformiertes Forum Forum TableInhaltsverzeichnis of Contents Part One: Europe and Britain Working Together ..................... 3 Part Two: Ideas of Union Grow ................................................ 8 Part Three: Working for Cromwell ......................................... 14 Annotation ............................................................................. 20 The Author ............................................................................. 21 Impressum ............................................................................. 22 1. Aufl. 2010 John Durie (1596–1680): Defragmenter of the Reformation John Durie (1596–1680): Defragmenter of the Reformation George M. Ella Part One: Europe and is the modern man of God today who Britain Working Together is world-renowned as a great preacher, pastor, diplomat, educator, scientist, lin- Who on earth is John Durie? guist, translator, man of letters, ambas- Most computer users have experi- sador, library reformer, mediator and enced hard disks full of jumbled, frag- politician? Who today produces best- mented files which block spaces causing sellers on a monthly basis, writing in memory and retrieval problems. What half a dozen different languages? In all a relief it is to switch on a defragmenter these fields John Durie has been called and have everything made ship-shape ‘great’ or ‘the greatest’, yet he is forgot- again. The Reformation in mid-seven- ten by his mother country whom he teenth century Britain had reached such served so long and well. This is perhaps a fragmentation and a defragmenter was because it is beyond human imagination called for. The man for the job was cer- that such a man could have existed and tainly John Durie who was possibly the his ‘type’ today is not called for. Trevor- most well-known man in Europe at the Roper, speaking of the great deeds of time and one whom countless crowned Durie and his colleagues in his Crisis heads, church leaders, politicians, gen- of the Seventeenth Century says ‘the need erals, educators, social reformers and produced the men’. Does it? We are in humble men and women loved and such a ten-fold need today but where respected. If anybody, he was the one are the men? Yet, Durie’s idea of a pan- to knit together again what denomina- European Reformed Church based on tionalism, legalism, rationalism, politi- a reformation of church life and edu- cal strife, opportunism and personal cation was supported by the majority ambition had rent asunder. of Reformers and Puritans from Eliza- “Who on earth is John Durie?” you beth’s days to post-Restitution times. might well say; “Never heard of him!”. Durie was supported by Charles I This common ignorance is one of and Oliver Cromwell, besides most of the tragedies of our present confused the crowned heads of Europe and the churches. Britain has forgotten another leaders of the various republics and of her greatest Christian heroes. Where Swiss cantons. Reformed Bishops and Archbishops Hall, Davenant, Morton, REFORMIERTES FORUM 3 George M. Ella Bedell, Abbott and Ussher backed and Melville as pastor of St. Giles, Edin- Durie and even Laud promoted Durie’s burgh. He was banished twice by the plan of Protestant unity in Europe with King but ended his life on a royal pen- a surprising degree of enthusiasm as his sion. John’s father, Robert Durie was an letters show. Later, the Commonwealth ex-monk and Presbyterian minister in parliaments and the Westminster Anstruther, Fife, who had evangelised Assembly fully supported Durie’s enter- Lewis, the Orkneys and the Shetland prise. Indeed, John Durie was made a Islands. After a short prison sentence member of the Westminster Assembly and growing differences with James VI and Britain’s ambassador-at-large to which led him to extreme measures, he Europe chiefly because of his lead in was found guilty of treason and exiled promoting a pan-European Protestant in 1606. He and his young family found union and his great proficiency as a lin- a new home in Leyden, Holland. There guist. Cromwell is famed for his inter- John was educated in French, Dutch, national diplomacy but without Durie’s German, and Latin and matriculated in help, Cromwell would never have been theology aged 15 at Leyden University taken seriously in Europe for a number before doing further studies in Sedan of reasons. Indeed, when Charles’ head under his cousin Andrew Melville. fell, most of the Continental kingdoms Other sources say that Durie finished and dukedoms broke with England. his studies at Oxford because of the It was largely due to Durie’s frequent great libraries there. It is said that when diplomatic tours of the Continent that Durie travelled anywhere in Europe, relations bettered. Thus when James he would adopt the clothing and lan- Reid in his excellent Memoirs of the guages of the various countries and Westminster Divines, introduces Durie always be taken for a native. He even as: ‘A Scotchman, and learned Divine, adapted his own name to suit the local who was eminently distinguished by language being known on the Conti- his indefatigable industry to promote nent as Johannes Duraeus and at least union among Christians, and a mem- five other variants. ber of the Assembly of Divines at West- Now twenty-five years of age, Durie minster’, he does not reveal a fraction of became a private teacher for two Durie’s value to Britain. years in France, coaching the son of Barthelemy Panhausen, a Huguenot merchant. Then Durie was called to An exile Scotsman pastor the Belgic church in Cologne becomes a leader in Europe from 1624–1626 where he preached in John Durie was born in Edinburgh in French, Dutch and Latin. Durie’s great 1596 of a long line of ministers, diplo- talents as an internationalist reached mats, lairds and rebels. His grandfather Charles I’s ears and he was asked to of the same name worked with Knox accompany Ambassador Extraordinary, 4 MBS TEXTE 148 John Durie (1596–1680): Defragmenter of the Reformation Lord James Spence on his Swedish jour- A small Gnesio-Lutheran faction cam- ney to make Gustav II Adolf a knight paigned for a full acceptance of the of the Order of the Garter. Durie was Lutheran formulas but there was a accepted gladly by the Swedish Court stronger Reformed group amongst the and leading ministers and gained life- Swedish middle-class, a large group of long friends. Reformed Waldensians immigrants and King Gustav decided to make Elbing a number of Greek Orthodox on the in West Prussia the capital of his Ger- borders of Sweden’s Baltic Empire, each man-Polish territories and Durie was with their own views of the Lord’s Sup- called in 1624 or 1625 to pastor the per, so no one view prevailed. A recent multi-national church there, originally chat this author had with Archbishop founded by Scottish and English mer- Anders Weyryd concerning Cromwell’s chants. Durie found himself minister- efforts for church union with Sweden ing in several languages again, now confirmed that, even today, the State including Lithuanian. Because of the Church in Sweden allows local churches different church backgrounds involved, freedom in expressing faith rather than he pastored ‘ecumenically’ but based enforces nation-wide strict rules of on the sound doctrines of the Ref- faith and order. It must be added that ormation. Having qualms about not not even the German Lutherans stood being ordained, he corresponded with unanimously behind the Book of Con- Bishop Joseph Hall of Dortian fame on cord which became a Book of Discord the subject. At this time Sweden had for many.2 gone through a real indigenous Ref- Gustav Adolf also set up his High ormation so they did not feel obliged Court at Elbing and the new senior to accept any other major European judge and Privy Councillor, Kaspar Reformed Creeds whether Lutheran, Godemann, who had recommended Reformed or Anglican. They did, how- Durie as pastor to the King, was a ever, instruct their theological students fervent Reformed Unionist. Gustav in Melanchthon’s Confessio Augustana called English statesman and Reformed Variata of 1540. This version toned Christian Thomas Roe as ambassador down consubstantiation so much that it to mediate in the Swedish-German- was accepted by both Calvin and Beza, Polish peace treaties. Roe soon told leaving the Frenchmen less Reformed Durie that he, too, desired a stronger than the Church of England Reformers pan-European church and political who followed Bullinger’s interpretation union based on a common Reformed of the Lord’s Supper. The Book of Con- stand against Rome. Roe felt this union cord was not even on the curriculum. could stretch as far as Turkey as he had So, Michael Dewar is incorrect in say- been successful in gaining an ear for ing that the Swedes held ‘tenaciously Reformed doctrine during his ambas- to the doctrine of Consubstantiation’.1 sadorship there. A further resident of REFORMIERTES FORUM 5 George M. Ella Elbing, Samuel Hartlib, who was to Sweden and Germany and Archbishop help reform England’s schools and agri- Abbot was immediately captivated by culture under Cromwell, also shared Durie’s charm, faith and great sincer- Durie’s views. Some time later, Durie’s ity. Both authorised Durie to represent and Hartlib’s friend and co-worker Britain as ambassador to Europe in the John Amos Comenius, the internati- interest of ecumenical peace. He was onally famous Reformed theologian equipped with a limited budget, diplo- and educator, settled in Elbing, so for matic passports and recommendations many years the city became the centre from leading politicians and clergy. of international political, religious and On the Scottish side, ties with educational reform.
Recommended publications

  • Puritans, Lawyers, and Politics in Early Seventeenth Century England

    REVIEWS PURITANS, LAWYERS, AND POLITICS IN EARLY SEVENTEENTH CENTURY ENG- LAND. By John Dykstra Eusden. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1958. Pp. xii, 238. $4.50. THE preface of this book reveals a scholar functioning in the best tradition of his profession. Aware that scholarship is fundamentally a cooperative enter- prise and yet that an author must ultimately "stand alone," Eusden acknowl- edges an indebtedness to many and modestly rates his own contribution to historical knowledge. Candidly, also, he confesses having had to abandon a conjecture which intrigued him, for "the evidence of Puritan influence on common law and vice versa did not materialize."1 He retreats to a relationship between Puritanism and common law which he is able amply to support, "one of ideological parallelism." His analysis concerns the substance of what men perseveringly wanted and manifestly expressed in the early seventeenth century, not with what the twentieth century might articulate for them. For his period of intensive study he takes the years 1603 to 1630, which were sketched in broader strokes by Notestein in his The English People on the Eve of Colonization.2 Although the first five chapters of the Eusden book deal with ideas and events familiar to students of the seventeenth century, the author engages in an organization of this material essential to his purpose. The Puritans of his study comprise three groups who worked together in their common predicament but were differentiated by their concepts of church organization-the Puritan Anglicans, the Presbyterians, and the Independents or pre-Civil-War "nonseparating Congregationalists," who favored an estab- lished but loosely federated church.
  • JAMES USSHER Copyright Material: Irish Manuscripts Commission

    JAMES USSHER Copyright Material: Irish Manuscripts Commission

    U3-030215 qxd.qxd:NEW USH3 3/2/15 11:20 Page i The Correspondence of JAMES USSHER Copyright material: Irish Manuscripts Commission Commission Manuscripts Irish material: Copyright U3-030215 qxd.qxd:NEW USH3 3/2/15 11:20 Page iii The Correspondence of JAMES USSHER 1600–1656 V O L U M E I I I 1640–1656 Commission Letters no. 475–680 editedManuscripts by Elizabethanne Boran Irish with Latin and Greek translations by David Money material: Copyright IRISH MANUSCRIPTS COMMISSION 2015 U3-030215 qxd.qxd:NEW USH3 3/2/15 11:20 Page iv For Gertie, Orla and Rosemary — one each. Published by Irish Manuscripts Commission 45 Merrion Square Dublin 2 Ireland www.irishmanuscripts.ie Commission Copyright © Irish Manuscripts Commission 2015 Elizabethanne Boran has asserted her right to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with the Copyright and Related Rights Act 2000, Section 107. Manuscripts ISBN 978-1-874280-89-7 (3 volume set) Irish No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of the publisher. The index was completed with the support of the Arts andmaterial: Social Sciences Benefaction Fund, Trinity College, Dublin. Copyright Typeset by December Publications in Adobe Garamond and Times New Roman Printed by Brunswick Press Index prepared by Steve Flanders U3-030215 qxd.qxd:NEW USH3 3/2/15 11:20 Page v S E R I E S C O N T E N T S V O L U M E I Abbreviations xxv Acknowledgements xxix Introduction xxxi Correspondence of James Ussher: Letters no.
  • Title Page R.J. Pederson

    Title Page R.J. Pederson

    Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/22159 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation Author: Pederson, Randall James Title: Unity in diversity : English puritans and the puritan reformation, 1603-1689 Issue Date: 2013-11-07 Chapter 3 John Downame (1571-1652) 3.1 Introduction John Downame (or Downham) was one of the greatest exponents of the precisianist strain within Puritanism during the pre-revolutionary years of the seventeenth century, a prominent member of London Puritanism, and renowned casuist.1 His fame rests chiefly in his nineteen published works, most of which were works of practical divinity, such as his four-part magnum opus, The Christian Warfare (1604-18), and his A Guide to Godlynesse (1622), a shorter, though still copious, manual for Christian living. Downame was also known for his role in publishing two of the most popular theological manuals: Sir Henry Finch’s The Summe of Sacred Divinitie (1620), which consisted of a much more expanded version of Finch’s earlier Sacred Doctrine (1613), and Archbishop James Ussher’s A Body of Divinitie (1645), which was published from rough manuscripts and without Ussher’s consent, having been intended for private use.2 Downame also had a role in codifying the Westminster annotations on the Bible, being one of a few city ministers to work on the project, though he never sat at the Westminster Assembly.3 Downame’s older brother, 1 Various historians from the seventeenth century to the present have spelled Downame’s name differently (either Downame or Downham). The majority of seventeenth century printed works, however, use “Downame.” I here follow that practice.
  • EB WARD Diary

    EB WARD Diary

    THE DIARY OF SAMUEL WARD, A TRANSLATOR OF THE 1611 KING JAMES BIBLE Transcribed and prepared by Dr. M.M. Knappen, Professor of English History, University of Chicago. Edited by John W. Cowart Bluefish Books Cowart Communications Jacksonville, Florida www.bluefishbooks.info THE DIARY OF SAMUEL WARD, A TRANSLATOR OF THE 1611 KING JAMES BIBLE. Copyright © 2007 by John W. Cowart. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America by Lulu Press. Apart from reasonable fair use practices, no part of this book’s text may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission from the publisher except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews. For information address Bluefish Books, 2805 Ernest St., Jacksonville, Florida, 32205. Library of Congress Cataloging-in- Publication Data has been applied for. Lulu Press # 1009823. Bluefish Books Cowart Communications Jacksonville, Florida www.bluefishbooks.info SAMUEL WARD 1572 — 1643 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION …………………………………..…. 1 THE TWO SAMUEL WARDS……………………. …... 13 SAMUEL WARD’S LISTIING IN THE DICTIONARY OF NATIONAL BIOGRAPHY…. …. 17 DR. M.M. KNAPPEN’S PREFACE ………. …………. 21 THE PURITAN CHARACTER IN THE DIARY. ….. 27 DR. KNAPPEN’S LIFE OF SAMUEL WARD …. …... 43 THE DIARY TEXT …………………………….……… 59 THE 1611 TRANSLATORS’ DEDICATION TO THE KING……………………………………….… 97 THE 1611 TRANSLATORS’ PREFACE TO BIBLE READERS ………………………………………….….. 101 BIBLIOGRAPHY ……………………………….…….. 129 INTRODUCTION by John W. Cowart amuel Ward, a moderate Puritan minister, lived from 1572 to S1643. His life spanned from the reign of Britain’s Queen Elizabeth, through that of King James. and into the days of Charles I. Surviving pages of Ward’s dated diary entries run from May 11, 1595, to July 1, 1632.
  • The 1641 Lords' Subcommittee on Religious Innovation

    The 1641 Lords' Subcommittee on Religious Innovation

    A “Theological Junto”: the 1641 Lords’ subcommittee on religious innovation Introduction During the spring of 1641, a series of meetings took place at Westminster, between a handful of prominent Puritan ministers and several of their Conformist counterparts. Officially, these men were merely acting as theological advisers to a House of Lords committee: but both the significance, and the missed potential, of their meetings was recognised by contemporary commentators and has been underlined in recent scholarship. Writing in 1655, Thomas Fuller suggested that “the moderation and mutual compliance of these divines might have produced much good if not interrupted.” Their suggestions for reform “might, under God, have been a means, not only to have checked, but choked our civil war in the infancy thereof.”1 A Conformist member of the sub-committee agreed with him. In his biography of John Williams, completed in 1658, but only published in 1693, John Hacket claimed that, during these meetings, “peace came... near to the birth.”2 Peter Heylyn was more critical of the sub-committee, in his biography of William Laud, published in 1671; but even he was quite clear about it importance. He wrote: Some hoped for a great Reformation to be prepared by them, and settled by the grand committee both in doctrine and discipline, and others as much feared (the affections of the men considered) that doctrinal Calvinism being once settled, more alterations would be made in the public liturgy... till it was brought more near the form of Gallic churches, after the platform of Geneva.3 A number of Non-conformists also looked back on the sub-committee as a missed opportunity.
  • A Pilgrimage Through English History and Culture (M-S)

    A Pilgrimage Through English History and Culture (M-S)

    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Faculty Publications 2009-05-01 A Pilgrimage Through English History and Culture (M-S) Gary P. Gillum [email protected] Susan Wheelwright O'Connor Alexa Hysi Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/facpub Part of the English Language and Literature Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Gillum, Gary P.; O'Connor, Susan Wheelwright; and Hysi, Alexa, "A Pilgrimage Through English History and Culture (M-S)" (2009). Faculty Publications. 11. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/facpub/11 This Other is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. 1462 MACHIAVELLI, NICCOLÒ, 1469-1527 Rare 854.318 N416e 1675 The Works of the famous Nicolas Machiavel: citizen and Secretary of Florence. Written Originally in Italian, and from thence newly and faithfully Translated into English London: Printed for J.S., 1675. Description: [24], 529 [21]p. ; 32 cm. References: Wing M128. Subjects: Political science. Political ethics. War. Florence (Italy)--History. Added Author: Neville, Henry, 1620-1694, tr. Contents: -The History of florence.-The Prince.-The original of the Guelf and Ghibilin Factions.-The life of Castruccio Castracani.-The Murther of Vitelli, &c. by Duke Valentino.-The State of France.- The State of Germany.-The Marriage of Belphegor, a Novel.-Nicholas Machiavel's Letter in Vindication of Himself and His Writings. Notes: Printer's device on title-page. Title enclosed within double line rule border. Head pieces. Translated into English by Henry Neville.
  • John Milton's Pedagogical Philosophy As It Applies to His Prose and Poetry

    John Milton's Pedagogical Philosophy As It Applies to His Prose and Poetry

    JOHN MILTON'S PEDAGOGICAL PHILOSOPHY AS IT APPLIES TO HIS PROSE AND POETRY by JOOLY MARY VARGHESE, B.A., M.A. A DISSERTATION IN ENGLISH Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved May, 1999 Copyright 1999 Jooly Mary Varghese, B.A., M.A ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work could not have been completed without the help of many dear friends and family members, and while unable to name all of them individually here, I am thankful to each one of them. I am immensely grateful to my committee chairperson, Dr. Thomas Langford, who initially gave me the idea for this work. I feel somewhat inept in my attempt to express my gratitude, for he has not only served as a chairperson, but as a mentor, an advisor, and an example of the kind of teacher I aspire to be like. I am also thankful to Dr. James Whitlark for his interest in my work and for his timely and helpful responses, and to Dr. Don Rude for his guidance and support. There are several friends in the department to whom I am grateful for their advice and friendship. Special thanks to Pat and especially to Robin for the many hours in the computer lab working on formatting and other such exciting matters. Robin, I think I still owe you a "fizzy drink." Thank you. 11 My greatest thanks are for my family, especially my parents, whose love and prayers, I am certain, are the reason for my success in this endeavor.
  • Protestant Propaganda in a Cold War of Religion: from the Hartlib Circle to the Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge Sugiko Nishikawa

    Protestant Propaganda in a Cold War of Religion: from the Hartlib Circle to the Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge Sugiko Nishikawa

    LITHUANIAN historical STUDIES 16 2011 ISSN 1392-2343 PP. 51–59 PROTESTANT PROPAGANDA IN A COLD War OF RELIGION: FROM THE HARTLIB CIRCLE TO THE SOCIETY FOR PROMOTING CHRISTIAN KNOWLEDGE Sugiko Nishikawa ABSTRACT This article considers how, impelled by confessional divisions caused by the Reformation, a general sense of pan-Protestant community grew across Europe, and its members launched a long battle against Ro- man Catholicism far beyond the 16th century. Indeed, it continued into the mid-18th century, the so-called Age of Reason. If it cannot necessarily be described as an open war of religion like the Thirty Years War, it was at least a cold war. From their points of view, the Protestant minorities threat- ened by the Roman Catholic Counter Reformation, such as the Waldensi- ans in northern Italy and the Lithuanian Calvinists, stood on the front line in this war. Thus, financial support was regularly offered by the Protestant churches in Great Britain and Ireland to their distressed brethren across the continent, university scholarships were set up for students from Catholic- dominated areas, and plans were drafted for a Protestant union in Europe, from a military level to an ecclesiastical one. It is in this context that we must understand how apparently strange a phenomenon as British support for the translation of the Bible into Lithuanian developed. The author sees Chylinski’s activities in the tradition of learning and charity exhibited in the 1650s by the three leading members of the Hartlib philosophical circle, namely, Samuel Hartlib (originally from Elbing), Jan Amos Comenius (from Moravia), and John Dury (born in Edinburgh, he spent his early life in vari- ous places in northern Europe), who were, in a sense, Protestant refugees to England from north-central Europe.
  • Calvin Theological Seminary Covenant In

    Calvin Theological Seminary Covenant In

    CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY COVENANT IN CONFLICT: THE CONTROVERSY OVER THE CHURCH COVENANT BETWEEN SAMUEL RUTHERFORD AND THOMAS HOOKER A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY SANG HYUCK AHN GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN MAY 2011 CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY 3233 Burton SE • Grand Rapids, Michigan. 49546-4301 800388-6034 Jax: 616957-8621 [email protected] www.calvinserninary.edu This dissertation entitled COVENANT IN CONFLICT: THE CONTROVERSY OVER THE CHURCH COVENANT BETWEEN SAMUEL RUTHERFORD AND THOMAS HOOKER written by SANG HYUCK AHN and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy has been accepted by the faculty of Calvin Theological Seminary upon the recommendation ofthe undersigned readers: Carl R Trueman, Ph.D. David M. Rylaarsda h.D. Date Acting Vice President for Academic Affairs Copyright © 2011 by Sang Hyuck Ahn All rights reserved To my Lord, the Head of the Church Soli Deo Gloria! CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ix ABSTRACT xi CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1 I. Statement of the Thesis 1 II. Statement of the Problem 2 III. Survey of Scholarship 6 IV. Sources and Outline 10 CHAPTER 2. THE HISTORICAL CONTEXT OF THE RUTHERFORD-HOOKER DISPUTE ABOUT CHURCH COVENANT 15 I. The Church Covenant in New England 15 1. Definitions 15 1) Church Covenant as a Document 15 2) Church Covenant as a Ceremony 20 3) Church Covenant as a Doctrine 22 2. Secondary Scholarship on the Church Covenant 24 II. Thomas Hooker and New England Congregationalism 31 1. A Short Biography 31 2. Thomas Hooker’s Life and His Congregationalism 33 1) The England Period, 1586-1630 33 2) The Holland Period, 1630-1633: Paget, Forbes, and Ames 34 3) The New England Period, 1633-1647 37 III.
  • Title Page R.J. Pederson

    Title Page R.J. Pederson

    Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/22159 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation Author: Pederson, Randall James Title: Unity in diversity : English puritans and the puritan reformation, 1603-1689 Issue Date: 2013-11-07 UNITY IN DIVERSITY: ENGLISH PURITANS AND THE PURITAN REFORMATION 1603-1689 Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van Doctor aan de Universiteit Leiden, op gezag van Rector Magnificus prof. mr. Carel Stolker volgens besluit van het College voor promoties te verdedigen op 7 November 2013 klokke 15:00 uur door Randall James Pederson geboren te Everett, Washington, USA in 1975 Promotiecommissie Promotores: Prof. dr. Gijsbert van den Brink Prof. dr. Richard Alfred Muller, Calvin Theological Seminary, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA Leden: Prof. dr. Ernestine van der Wall Dr. Jan Wim Buisman Prof. dr. Henk van den Belt Prof. dr. Willem op’t Hof Dr. Willem van Vlastuin Contents Part I: Historical Method and Background Chapter One: Historiographical Introduction, Methodology, Hypothesis, and Structure ............. 1 1.1 Another Book on English Puritanism? Historiographical Justification .................. 1 1.2 Methodology, Hypothesis, and Structure ...................................................................... 20 1.2.1 Narrative and Metanarrative .............................................................................. 25 1.2.2 Structure ................................................................................................................... 31 1.3 Summary ................................................................................................................................
  • The Making of Englishmen Studies in the History of Political Thought

    The Making of Englishmen Studies in the History of Political Thought

    The Making of Englishmen Studies in the History of Political Thought Edited by Terence Ball, Arizona State University JÖrn Leonhard, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg Wyger Velema, University of Amsterdam Advisory Board Janet Coleman, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK Vittor Ivo Comparato, University of Perugia, Italy Jacques Guilhaumou, CNRS, France John Marshall, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA Markku Peltonen, University of Helsinki, Finland VOLUME 8 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/ship The Making of Englishmen Debates on National Identity 1550–1650 By Hilary Larkin LEIDEN • BOSTON 2014 This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 license, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. Further information and the complete license text can be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0/ The terms of the CC license apply only to the original material. The use of material from other sources (indicated by a reference) such as diagrams, illustrations, photos and text samples may require further permission from the respective copyright holder. An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libraries working with Knowledge Unlatched. More information about the initiative can be found at www. knowledgeunlatched.org. Cover illustration: Titian (c1545) Portrait of a Young Man (The Young Englishman). Galleria Palatina (Palazzo Pitti), Florence, Italy. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Larkin, Hilary. The making of Englishmen : debates on national identity, 1550-1650 / by Hilary Larkin.
  • The Number of the Beast in Seventeenth- and Eighteenth

    The Number of the Beast in Seventeenth- and Eighteenth

    219 The Number of the Beast in Seventeenth- and Eighteenth­ Century England by David Brady The author of this study, who makes his debut in our pages, is a member of the staff of the John Rylands University Library of Manchester. We are grateful to him for thus sharing with us some of the fruit of his research into a fascinating phase of the history of New Testament interpretation. Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six (Rev. I3: 18). HIS text has been a crux interpretum for commentators on the T Book of Revelation since the day that the Apocalypse was first penned. What commentators have said of this text has also been indicative of what they have said about the rest of the book. For this reason, what at first may appear to be a velY tiny chapter in the history of Biblical exegesis, is in fact a key to the much larger subject dealing with the history of the interpretation of the entire Book of Revelation. That subject is here narrowed to a brief survey of what was written on this matter in the British Isles in two post­ Reformation centuries, in the belief that by concentrating our analy­ sis on this particular text it is possible to obtain a general grasp of a writer's approach to the Book of Revelation as a whole. The text is not only a mirror to the soul of the individual commen­ tator, it is also a mirror of the times in which he lived.