DOCSLIB.ORG

Manisa Alaşehir Irrigation Modernization Project First Phase Resettlement Action Plan April 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Manisa Alaşehir Irrigation Modernization Project First Phase Resettlement Action Plan April 2021 Manisa Alaşehir Irrigation Modernization Project First Phase Resettlement Action Plan April 2021 SRM Danışmanlık 4/22/21 DSİ i Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. i 1. Purpose ......................................................................................................................................... i 2. Impact Area and Land Acquisition Impacts of the RAP Phase 1 ................................................. i 3. Method Applied for Resettlement Action Plan Preparation ...................................................... vii 4. PAPs and Stakeholders’ Approach to the Project ...................................................................... ix 5. Grievance Mechanism ................................................................................................................ ix 6. Entitlements ................................................................................................................................ ix 7. RAP Implementation and Measures to be Taken ........................................................................ x Definitions ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Abbreviations .......................................................................................................................................... 3 List of Tables and Figures ....................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1. Aims, Objectives and Scope of RAP ....................................................................................... 7 1.2. Project Introduction ................................................................................................................. 9 1.3. Introduction of the Alaşehir Water Users Association ............................................................ 9 1.4. Impact Area and Land Acquisition Impacts of the RAP Phase 1 .......................................... 10 1.5. Methodology ......................................................................................................................... 14 1.6. Constraints ............................................................................................................................. 18 1.7. Land Acquisition Process ...................................................................................................... 18 2. Socio-Economic Baseline .............................................................................................................. 22 2.1. Demographics ........................................................................................................................ 22 2.2. Education, Health, Infrastructure .......................................................................................... 28 2.3. Sources of Income and Expenses .......................................................................................... 30 2.3.1. Sources of Income ......................................................................................................... 33 2.3.2. Expenses ........................................................................................................................ 36 2.4. Agricultural Activities and Land Use .................................................................................... 38 2.4.1. Agriculture ..................................................................................................................... 43 2.4.2. Livestock Production ..................................................................................................... 49 2.5. Organization .......................................................................................................................... 52 2.5.1. Water Users Association ............................................................................................... 53 2.6. Vulnerable Groups and Social Assistance Supports .............................................................. 55 2.6.1. Vulnerable Groups ........................................................................................................ 55 2.6.2. Social Assistance Supports ............................................................................................ 56 3. Potential Impacts ........................................................................................................................... 58 3.1. Identification of Project Impacts ........................................................................................... 58 ii 3.2. Land Acquisition Impact ....................................................................................................... 58 3.2.1. Types of Affected Land ................................................................................................. 58 3.2.2. Private Parcels by Acquisition Type and Duration of Impact ....................................... 59 3.2.3. Land Acquisition Impact on Other Parcels.................................................................... 62 3.2.4. Impact Level on Users of Other Parcels ........................................................................ 63 3.2.5. The Impacts on the PAPs Surveyed .............................................................................. 64 3.3. Affected Immovable Properties ............................................................................................. 65 3.4. Affected Trees ....................................................................................................................... 65 3.4.1. Number and Species of Trees on Affected Privately-Owned Parcels ........................... 66 3.4.2. Number and Species of Trees on Other Affected Parcels ............................................. 66 3.5. Notifications from Stakeholders ............................................................................................ 67 3.5.1. Mukhtars of the Project-Impacted Settlements ............................................................. 67 3.5.2. Interviewed PAPs .......................................................................................................... 67 3.5.3. Institutional Stakeholders .............................................................................................. 68 3.6. Impacts of the Project and Proposed Measures ..................................................................... 69 4. Legal Framework .......................................................................................................................... 75 4.1. National Legislation .............................................................................................................. 75 4.1.1. Applicable National Legislation on Land Acquisition .................................................. 75 4.1.2. National Legislation Concerning Easement .................................................................. 76 4.1.3. Applicable National Legislation Concerning Land Consolidation ................................ 77 4.2. World Bank OP: 4.12 ............................................................................................................ 77 4.2.1. Operational Policy No. 4.12 of the World Bank on Involuntary Resettlement ............. 77 4.3. Gap Analysis and Measures for the Harmonization of the Turkish Legislation with the World Bank's OP 4.12 Operational Policy ................................................................................................... 78 5. Implementation, Compensation and Other Supports ..................................................................... 87 5.1. Land Acquisition Process ...................................................................................................... 87 5.2. Identification of Rights Holders ............................................................................................ 88 5.3. Responsibilities of DSI for the implementation of RAP ....................................................... 89 5.4. Studies of Other Relevant Institutions in the Region and Cooperation Opportunities .......... 92 5.5. Mitigation Measures .............................................................................................................. 94 5.6. Cut-off date ............................................................................................................................ 95 5.7. Entitlement Matrix ................................................................................................................ 95 6. Method of Valuation ................................................................................................................... 108 6.1. Valuation in Lands .............................................................................................................. 108 6.2. Valuation in Parcels ............................................................................................................. 108 iii 6.3. Valuation of Buildings on Lands and Parcels ..................................................................... 109 6.4. Debris Value ........................................................................................................................ 109 6.5. Precedent Value
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Keskinoğlu Tavukculuk Ve Damizlik Isletmeleri Sanayi Ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi, Turkey
    Keskinoğlu Tavukculuk ve Damizlik Isletmeleri Sanayi ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi, Turkey Egg-Laying Poultry Facility Project Non-Technical Summary Prepared for: Kesinoglu Akhisar, Turkey Prepared by: ENVIRON UK Limited Date: August 2012 Project or Issue Number: UK14-17009 Keskinoğlu Non Technical Summary Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Project Description 2 2.1 Overview 2 2.2 Environmental Setting 4 2.3 Socio-economic Setting 4 3 Summary of Overall Findings 6 3.1 Overview 6 3.2 Current Operations 6 3.3 Planned/Future Operations 8 3.4 Cogeneration Plant 8 3.5 Auto Warehouse for Cold Storage 9 3.6 Egg Production 9 3.7 Hatchery 11 3.8 Egg Breaking and Pasteurization 12 3.9 Logistics Centre 12 3.10 Manure Drying System 13 3.11 Live Bird Handling Modernization 13 3.12 Layer Rearing Facility at Kapakli 14 3.13 EIA Status, Impacts and Mitigation Measures 14 4 Summary of Actions 17 4.1 Environmental and Social Action Plan (ESAP) 17 4.2 Stakeholder Engagement Plan (SEP) 17 5 Summary 20 UK14-17009 Issue: 05 ENVIRON Keskinoğlu Non Technical Summary 1 Introduction Keskinoğlu Tavukculuk ve Damizlik Isletmeleri Sanayi ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi (Keskinoğlu or “the Company”) has plans to expand its current production capacity including poultry breeding, egg production and slaughtering within the Akhisar area of Turkey. When the expansion programme is completed, it will increase Keskinoğlu’s egg production capacity from 2 to 5 million eggs per day. Keskinoğlu is seeking financing from the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) for its expansion programme.
    [Show full text]
  • Jigsaw II Versus Jigsaw IV on the Subject of the Building Blocks of Matter and Atom
    www.jeseh.net Which One is Better? Jigsaw II Versus Jigsaw IV on the Subject of the Building Blocks of Matter and Atom Hakan Turkmen, Didem Buyukaltay Ege University To cite this article: Turkmen, H. & Buyukaltay, D. (2015). Which one is better? Jigsaw II versus Jigsaw IV on the subject of the building blocks of matter and atom. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health (JESEH), 1(2), 88-94. This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Authors alone are responsible for the contents of their articles. The journal owns the copyright of the articles. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of the research material. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health Volume 1, Issue 2, 2015 ISSN: 2149-214X Which one is better? Jigsaw II versus Jigsaw IV on the Subject of the Building Blocks of Matter and Atom Hakan Turkmen*, Didem Buyukaltay Ege University Abstract In this study, the effect of using Jigsaw II and Jigsaw IV techniques on the subject of “Atoms-The Basic Unit of Matter” in science course of 6th grade on academic achievement was examined. Pre-test post-test control group research was used in the study. Study population is all secondary schools in Turgutlu district of Manisa province and the sample group was determined from “Samiye Nuri Sevil Secondary School” among 20 secondary schools in Turgutlu district through cluster sampling method.
    [Show full text]
  • Determination of Inorganic Elements in Poppy Straw by Scanning Electron Microscopy with Energy Dispersive Spectrometry As a Means of Ascertaining Origin
    Determination of inorganic elements in poppy straw by scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive spectrometry as a means of ascertaining origin E. ÇOPUR Department of Chemistry, Gendarmarie General Command Criminal Laboratory, Ankara, Turkey 4 N. G. GÖGER, and T. ORBEY Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey B. SENER¸ Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey ABSTRACT Cultivation of poppy as a source of opium alkaloids for legitimate medical purposes has a long tradition in Turkey. The main products are poppy straw and concentrate of poppy straw, obtained from dried poppy capsules. The aims of the study reported in the present article were to establish inorganic element profiles for the poppy-growing provinces of Turkey by means of X-ray analysis by scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive spectrometry (SEM/EDS) and to explore the potential of the technique for determination of origin. Ten elements (sodium, magnesium, silicon, phosphorus, sulphur, chlorine, potassium, calcium, copper and zinc) were analysed in poppy straw samples from 67 towns in nine provinces. As regards the determination of origin, the most significant finding was the presence of copper and zinc in the poppy straw samples from 8 of the 15 towns in Afyon Province. Since those elements are not normally found in soil, it is assumed that their presence is the result of environmental (industrial) contamination. Differences in the samples from the other eight provinces were less signifi- cant, possibly a result of their geographical proximity. Nevertheless, differences in the samples were apparent. Because the findings are relative rather than absolute in terms of presence or absence of individual inorganic elements, further research is required to convert them into operationally usable results.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effectiveness of Google Earth in the Acquisition of Spatial
    March 2019, Volume 11, Issue 4, 299-307 Received: 13 September 2018 The Effectiveness of Google Earth in the Revised: 15 November 2018 Acquisition of Spatial Perception Ability in Accepted: 27 February 2019 * ISSN: 1307-9298 Social Studies Courses Copyright © IEJEE www.iejee.com Ati Merça,**, Ali Ersoyb DOI: 10.26822/iejee.2019450788 Abstract The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of Google Earth (GE) application in acquiring spatial perception ability in the fourth-grade social studies course. The research was carried out in a fourth grade of a primary school in the Demirci district of Manisa Province in the year 2015-2016 using embedded experimental design. During the five-week implementation process of the research, activities based on the GE prac- tice were performed. A pre-test before the activities and a post-test after the activities were given to the students. In addition, semi-structured interviews were held with the students at the end of the implementation. The Wilcoxon test was used to analyze the data obtained from the achievement test, and the thematic analysis method was used to analyze the qualitative data. The results showed that there was a statistically significant difference between the pre- and post-test scores for the achievement tests. The students also stated that the activities based on the GE implementation increased their success and allowed them to gain spatial skills. In conclusion, the social studies course activities based on GE practice might have an important function for the students to gain spatial perception skills. Keywords: Primary School, Social Studies Course, Spatial Perception Ability, Google Earth, Mixed Method Introduction paper using the observations of spaces and to compare a place with the one drawn on paper (Erdoğan, 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineral Industry of Turkey in 2016
    2016 Minerals Yearbook TURKEY [ADVANCE RELEASE] U.S. Department of the Interior January 2020 U.S. Geological Survey The Mineral Industry of Turkey By Sinan Hastorun Turkey’s mineral industry produced primarily metals and decreases for illite, 72%; refined copper (secondary) and nickel industrial minerals; mineral fuel production consisted mainly (mine production, Ni content), 50% each; bentonite, 44%; of coal and refined petroleum products. In 2016, Turkey was refined copper (primary), 36%; manganese (mine production, the world’s leading producer of boron, accounting for 74% Mn content), 35%; kaolin and nitrogen, 32% each; diatomite, of world production (excluding that of the United States), 29%; bituminous coal and crushed stone, 28% each; chromite pumice and pumicite (39%), and feldspar (23%). It was also the (mine production), 27%; dolomite, 18%; leonardite, 16%; salt, 2d-ranked producer of magnesium compounds (10% excluding 15%; gold (mine production, Au content), 14%; silica, 13%; and U.S. production), 3d-ranked producer of perlite (19%) and lead (mine production, Pb content) and talc, 12% each (table 1; bentonite (17%), 4th-ranked producer of chromite ore (9%), Maden İşleri Genel Müdürlüğü, 2018b). 5th-ranked producer of antimony (3%) and cement (2%), 7th-ranked producer of kaolin (5%), 8th-ranked producer of raw Structure of the Mineral Industry steel (2%), and 10th-ranked producer of barite (2%) (table 1; Turkey’s industrial minerals and metals production was World Steel Association, 2017, p. 9; Bennett, 2018; Bray, 2018; undertaken mainly by privately owned companies. The Crangle, 2018a, b; Fenton, 2018; Klochko, 2018; McRae, 2018; Government’s involvement in the mineral industry was Singerling, 2018; Tanner, 2018; van Oss, 2018; West, 2018).
    [Show full text]
  • Table 2. Geographic Areas, and Biography
    Table 2. Geographic Areas, and Biography The following numbers are never used alone, but may be used as required (either directly when so noted or through the interposition of notation 09 from Table 1) with any number from the schedules, e.g., public libraries (027.4) in Japan (—52 in this table): 027.452; railroad transportation (385) in Brazil (—81 in this table): 385.0981. They may also be used when so noted with numbers from other tables, e.g., notation 025 from Table 1. When adding to a number from the schedules, always insert a decimal point between the third and fourth digits of the complete number SUMMARY —001–009 Standard subdivisions —1 Areas, regions, places in general; oceans and seas —2 Biography —3 Ancient world —4 Europe —5 Asia —6 Africa —7 North America —8 South America —9 Australasia, Pacific Ocean islands, Atlantic Ocean islands, Arctic islands, Antarctica, extraterrestrial worlds —001–008 Standard subdivisions —009 History If “history” or “historical” appears in the heading for the number to which notation 009 could be added, this notation is redundant and should not be used —[009 01–009 05] Historical periods Do not use; class in base number —[009 1–009 9] Geographic treatment and biography Do not use; class in —1–9 —1 Areas, regions, places in general; oceans and seas Not limited by continent, country, locality Class biography regardless of area, region, place in —2; class specific continents, countries, localities in —3–9 > —11–17 Zonal, physiographic, socioeconomic regions Unless other instructions are given, class
    [Show full text]
  • Manisa İl Ve İlçelerinde Saptanan Sivrisinek
    100 Özgün Araştırma / Original Investigation Manisa İl ve İlçelerinde Saptanan Sivrisinek Türlerinin (Diptera: Culicidae) Yaşam Alanları ve Mevsimsel Değişikliklere Göre Değerlendirilmesi Evaluation of Mosquito Species (Diptera: Culicidae) Identified in Manisa Province According to Their Breeding Sites and Seasonal Differences Hasan Muslu1, Özgür Kurt1, Ahmet Özbilgin2 1Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi, Biyoloji Bölümü, Manisa, Türkiye 2Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Parazitoloji Anabilim Dalı, Manisa, Türkiye ÖZET Amaç: Manisa ilinde yaşayan sivrisinek türlerini ve bunların neden olabileceği enfeksiyon hastalıklarını belirlemek amacıyla, Ekim 2008-Ekim 2009 arası sucul habitatlardan sivrisinek larva örnekleri toplanarak tür tayini yapılmıştır. Yöntemler: Çalışma alanlarında yüzey suyundan standart larva toplama kepçesi yardımıyla sivrisinek larvaları toplanmıştır. Toplanan 1. ve 2. evre sivrisinek larvaları laboratuvara getirilmiş, 3. ve 4. evre larva haline geldiklerinde tür tayinleri yapılmış ve ergin hale gelene dek laboratuarda tutulmuşlardır. Ayrıca, habitat suyunda bulunan sivrisinek pupaları ile 3. ve 4. evre larvalarından ergin hale geçenlerin tür tayinleri de yapılmıştır. Bulgular: Çalışmada toplam 8098 larvanın örneklemesi yapılmış ve Culex pipiens ile Culex martinii’nin Manisa’daki baskın türler olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlar Manisa’da Culex cinsine bağlı üç [Culex (Culex) pipiens, Culex (Neoculex) martinii ve Culex (Maillotia) deserticola], Culiseta cinsine bağlı iki [Culiseta (Culiseta)
    [Show full text]
  • Turkish Sultana Raisins Exports Continuing Raisin Annual Turkey
    THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY Required Report - public distribution Date: 7/31/2018 GAIN Report Number: TR8020 Turkey Raisin Annual Turkish Sultana Raisins Exports Continuing Approved By: Elizabeth Leonardi, Agricultural Attaché Prepared By: Kubilay Karabina, Agricultural Specialist Report Highlights: Raisin production forecast in Turkey in MY 2018/19 is 295,000 MT, down slightly from MY 2017/18 due to quality issues from heavy rains during the late spring and summer in the Aegean region. Turkey exports more than 90 percent of its domestic raisin production due to stable demand from Europe for sultana variety raisins, though exports are expected to decrease to 250,000 MT in MY 2018/19 in parallel with the drop in production. The Turkish Grain Board announced the procurement price for raisins in September 2017 and procured 4,682 MT of raisins from farmers. Turkey Raisin Annual Report 2018 Production Turkey is one of the world’s major raisin producers and exporters with over 1,200 different grape varieties being grown in the country. Turkey produces approximately 4 million MT of fresh grapes for all purposes, including raisins. The Aegean region is the most important grape producer and mainly produces seedless grapes used for raisins. The Marmara region surrounding Istanbul as well as Central Anatolia and Southeast Anatolia produce table and wine grapes. Table grapes make up about 50 percent of production, whereas drying grapes make up 35 percent, and the remainder is used for the production of traditional products such as pestil (dried fruit snack), pekmez (grape molasses), and 10-15 is for alcoholic beverage production, such as raki and wine.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance and Position of Manisa Province in Olive Growing of Turkey
    IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science (IOSR-JAVS) e-ISSN: 2319-2380, p-ISSN: 2319-2372. Volume 13, Issue 4 Ser. III (April 2020), PP 27-35 www.iosrjournals.org The importance and position of Manisa province in olive growing of Turkey *Ayşen Melda Çolak1 and Hakan Çulha2 1Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Science, Usak University, Uşak, Turkey 2Graduate School Uşak University, Uşak, Turkey Abstract: Olive, which is described as “the first of the trees, the sacred tree of the Mediterranean, the symbol of Peace and Honor, the source of healing”, is a subtropic fruit that has been cultivated in our country for centuries, where Mediterranean climate characteristics are widely affected. Mediterranean basin, Turkey has a climate which is one of 41 countries in the world with 174 million trees 4 is the presence of most olive producing countries. However, in Turkey olive cultivation, the quality is not at the desired level in processing and marketing. In this study, on data principles and statistical of Agricultural Sciences, world, olive condition, and Manisa, Turkey, Turkey general condition on the basis of and provinces olive yield and quality issues and their impact factors has been studied in comparison. In addition, the effects of the change of the demographic structure of the human labor force, which is the most important driving force of agriculture, which is a labor- intensive production activity, in the rural areas in which production takes place, on the agriculture and olive cultivation. Keywords: Olive, Manisa, yield, production ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Date of Submission: 25-04-2020 Date of Acceptance: 08-05-2020 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- I.
    [Show full text]
  • Kula Geopark: Turkey’S First European and Global Geopark
    Kula Geopark: Turkey’s first European and Global Geopark ERDAL GUMUS1 AND NICKOLAS ZOUROS2 - 1. Kula Jeopark Koordinatörlüğü, Kula Belediyesi, Pbx 45170, Manisa, Turkey <[email protected]> ¶ 2. University of the Aegean, Department of Geography, Pbx GR81100, Lesvos, Greece The Kula Geopark is situated in the Aegean Region of Turkey at Western Anatolia, within Manisa province, covering an area of 300 km2 . Kula is the youngest volcanic field in Turkey where Quaternary volcanism (1.1ma, 300ka and 10ka) prevailed up to prehistoric times. The outstanding volcanic structures of Kula Geopark area have been well known at least for 2000 years. The great ancient Greek Geographer Strabo (63BC–24AD) in his majestic book “Geographica” named Kula as “Katakekaumene” (fire-born) because of the coal black lava. Strabo (63BC–24AD) Geographica: …After this region one comes to the Catacecaumene country… The surface of the plains is covered with ashes, and the mountainous and rocky country is black, as though from conflagration… There are to be seen three pits, which are called Physse, or breathing holes… Above them lie rugged hills, which are reasonably supposed to have been heaped up by the hot masses blown forth from the Earth… Kula Geopark area is awarded by high geodiversity representing 200 million years of earth history including volcanic structures like spatter cones, maars, successive lava flow plains, lava caves and tubes, craters, basalt columns, dykes, 79 monogenic cinder cones aligned through a fissure as far as active karstic caves, badlands, fairy chimneys, mesa structures and schist tor topography. In addition to these outstanding geological heritages, Kula Geopark hosts 15,000 year old prehistoric human footprint fossils, which were conserved in the ash deposits.
    [Show full text]
  • Manisa İlinde Kekik Türlerinde (Lamiaceae) Saptanan Hymenoptera Türleri
    Ege Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Derg., 2006, 43(1):55-62 ISSN 1018-8851 Manisa İlinde Kekik Türlerinde (Lamiaceae) Saptanan Hymenoptera Türleri Serdar TEZCAN1 Erol YILDIRIM2 Sinan ANLAŞ3 4 Göksal BEYAZ Summary Hymenoptera Fauna of Oregano (Lamiaceae) in Manisa Province of Turkey This study was carried out to determine the Hymenoptera fauna of the oregano in Manisa Province of Turkey. As a result of this study, 20 species belonging to seven families were determined. These are: Cryptocheilus variipennis Sustera, 1924 (Pompilidae), Vespa crabro Linnaeus, 1758, Delta unguiculatum (Villers, 1789), Eumenes coarctatus Linnaeus, 1758, E. dubius Saassure, 1852 (Vespidae), Ammophila sabulosa Linnaeus, 1758, Podalonia hirsuta (Scopoli, 1763), Prionyx crudelis (Smith, 1856), Bembix olivacea Fabricius, 1787, Cerceris arenaria (Linnaeus, 1759), C. tuberculata Villers, 1789, Philanthus triangulum (Fabricius, 1775) (Sphecidae), Andrena carbonaria Linnaeus, 1758 (Andrenidae), Megachile apicalis Spinola, 1808, Chalicodoma derasa (Gerstaecker,1869) (Megachilidae), Apis mellifera Linnaeus, 1758, Bombus argillaceus (Scopoli, 1763), B. terrestris (Linnaeus, 1758) (Apidae), Agathis malvacearum Latreille, 1805 and Chelonus longiventris Tobias, 1964 (Braconidae). Among them A. mellifera was found as common and abundant species. Fourteen species were collected from Origanum sp., four species were collected from Coridothymus capitatus and two species were collected from both Origanum sp. and Coridothymus capitatus. Key words: Origanum, Coridothymus, fauna, Hymenoptera, Oregano, Turkey 1 Prof. Dr., E. Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi, Bitki Koruma Bölümü, 35100 Bornova, İzmir e-posta: [email protected] 2 Prof. Dr., Atatürk Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi, Bitki Koruma Bölümü, 25240 Erzurum 3 E. Ü. Fen Fakültesi, Biyoloji Bölümü, 35100 Bornova, İzmir 4 IMO, 225 sokak A Blok No: 26/2, 35040 Bornova, İzmir 55 Giriş Gerek iç tüketimde ortaya çıkan artış, gerekse dış talepler nedeniyle, aromatik bitki olan kekiğe Türkiye’de verilen önem artmıştır.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study on the Relationship Between Fertilizers, the Environment and Fertilizer Use: an Example of Alasehir and Sarıgol in Manisa Province, Turkey
    For cited: Cebeci, A. N. (2019). A Study on the Relationship between Fertilizers, the Environment and Fertilizer Use: An Example of Alasehir and Sarıgol in Manisa Province, Turkey. Journal of Current Research on Engineering, Science and Technology, 5 (2), 73-95. Journal of Current Research on Engineering, Year: 2019 Science and Technology Volume: 5 (JoCREST) Issue: 2 ISSN: 2651-2521 Research Article/Araştırma Makalesi doi: 10.26579/jocrest-5.2.6 A Study on the Relationship between Fertilizers, the Environment and Fertilizer Use: An Example of Alasehir and Sarıgol in Manisa Province, Turkey Ayşe Nuray CEBECİ1 Keywords Abstract Fertilizer- Today, environmental, human and public health awareness are at varying levels environment, in different countries, however on the whole, great progress has been made. The Turkey, Alasehir, problems caused by the use of inputs in agriculture are experienced in different Sarigol, fertilizer, dimensions in developed and developing countries, as well as in Turkey. Merely soil, consciousness, having laws is not sufficient for the use of the appropriate fertilizer. As such, the agricultural situation in Turkey and in the world during the 2007-2017 period has been pollution. primarily studied employing the deductive method. In addition, the study attempts to determine the use of chemical fertilizers, and the factors affecting it, of producers who depend on agricultural activities and make a living mainly from viticulture in the Alasehir and Sarigol districts of Manisa province, which is one of the most important production and export centers of Turkey and has an important place in agricultural inputs. It is aimed to reveal the effects fertilizer Article History use has on flora and fauna in the local ecosystem as well as the preferences and Received behaviors of the producers in fertilizer usage, and to determine whether the 21 Nov, 2019 producer is conscious in the use of its product as an input.
    [Show full text]