Iron Road Limited
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
CENTRAL EYRE IRON PROJECT Mining Lease Proposal Response Document This page is left deliberately blank Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary ..................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Joint Consultation Process ................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Submissions ......................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Response Documents .......................................................................................................... 2 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 Declaration ........................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Background .......................................................................................................................... 4 3 Results of the Public Consultation Process ................................................................... 5 3.1 Out of Scope Comments ...................................................................................................... 5 3.2 Content of Submissions ....................................................................................................... 6 3.3 Notes to Consider ................................................................................................................ 6 3.4 Summary of Issues Raised.................................................................................................... 7 4 Issues Raised by SA Government Agencies................................................................... 9 4.1 Government Comments #2, #3 and #5 – Groundwater, Chapter 19 & Appendix N ........................... 9 4.2 Government Comment # 6 - Geology/ Sterilisation, MLP Sections 2.6 and 3.5 ................................ 11 5 Correction to Information ......................................................................................... 13 6 Out of Scope Questions/Comments ........................................................................... 14 7 Master Index of Responses ........................................................................................ 21 8 Glossary .................................................................................................................... 25 List of Figures Figure 1: Overview of the CEIP components ................................................................................................... 1 Figure 2: Data from WaterConnect ............................................................................................................... 10 Figure 3: EL 3699 (now EL 4849) and Stage IV drilling targets ...................................................................... 12 Figure 4: Updated Mineral Resources for the CEIP ....................................................................................... 13 List of Tables Table 1: Summary of Issues Raised per Chapter ............................................................................................. 8 List of Attachments Attachment A: CEIP MLP - Responses to Public Submissions Attachment B: CEIP MLP – Government Issues / Comments and Iron Road’s Responses Attachment C: CEIP Mine Noise Modelling – Train Arrival Operational Scenarios Attachment D: Updated IWL Bulk Density Estimate Attachment E: Updated Table 15-15: Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: Air Quality Attachment F: Additional Water Budget Data for Post-Closure Simulation Mining Lease Proposal Response Document Updated October 2016 Page i This page is left deliberately blank Page ii Updated October 2016 Mining Lease Proposal Response Document 1 Executive Summary The Central Eyre Iron Project (CEIP) is located on the Eyre Peninsula in South Australia and comprises: • A proposed magnetite mining and minerals processing operation (CEIP Mine) near Warramboo, approximately 28 km south east of Wudinna • Significant infrastructure required to support the CEIP Mine and to provide the logistics chain to enable the export of magnetite concentrate to market (CEIP Infrastructure). This infrastructure comprises a long term employee village, water borefield, railway line, power line and deep sea port. On 5 November 2015, IRD Mining Operations Pty Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of Iron Road Limited, submitted an application for a Mineral Lease (ML) over the entire area of Mineral Claim (MC) 4383, together with a Mining Lease Proposal (MLP), to the Department of State Development (DSD) pursuant to section 35 of the Mining Act, 1971 (SA). The MLP covers all social, economic and environmental aspects of the proposed CEIP Mine and is compliant with DSD’s Minerals Regulatory Guidelines MG2a. At the same time the MLP was lodged, Iron Road submitted its Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to the Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure (DPTI) pursuant to section 46B of the Development Act, 1993 (SA). The EIS covers all social, economic and environmental aspects of the proposed CEIP Infrastructure together with requirements of the Commonwealth Government’s Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, 1999 (EPBC). The EPBC requirements have been incorporated into the EIS process and will be assessed in accordance with the Bilateral Agreement between the Commonwealth and South Australian Governments. Figure 1: Overview of the CEIP components Mining Lease Proposal Response Document Updated October 2016 Page 1 1.1 Joint Consultation Process On 19 November 2015, DSD and DPTI commenced a joint consultation process in respect to both the MLP and EIS concluding on 2 February 2016, a period of almost 11 weeks. The SA Government facilitated three public forums in the key towns of Port Neill, Cleve and Wudinna, all of which were attended by representatives from DPTI, DSD and Iron Road. The forums provided interested parties with an opportunity to hear directly from SA Government about the respective application and assessment processes and how they could make submissions relating to the EIS/EPBC or MLP (or both) during the public consultation period. Each forum took place over a five hour period (2pm – 7pm) and included presentations from DPTI, DSD and Iron Road. Comprehensive guidelines for the application, public consultation and assessment processes relating to the CEIP were prepared by SA Government and made available to interested parties at the public forums and online. In addition, and in accordance with legislation and/or DSD policy, SA Government distributed both hard copies of the MLP and EIS, together with USB memory sticks containing electronic copies, across the Eyre Peninsula to landowners, local Councils and libraries. Hard copies were also available for viewing at both DSD and DPTI offices in Adelaide together with free electronic copies on USB memory sticks. The MLP and EIS were also available for downloading from a dedicated Government website (www.ceipconsultation.sa.gov.au), the Iron Road website (www.ironroadlimited.com.au) and from the DSD and sa.gov.au websites. 1.2 Submissions At the conclusion of the public consultation period, a total of 105 public submissions were received by SA Government, 53 of those being supportive in nature and setting out numerous reasons why the CEIP is an important development to South Australia’s economic and social wellbeing. For example, submitters noted that the CEIP would: • Improve employment and career opportunities; • Provide a diversification of industries; and • Increase economic benefits and contribute to a reversing of the population decline across the Eyre Peninsula, particularly within the Wudinna DC area. Of those 105 public submissions, 16 raised issues or requests for further information/clarification to be addressed by Iron Road relating only to the MLP while a further 19 submissions related to both the MLP and the EIS/EPBC. The remaining submissions either raised concerns purely in relation to the EIS/EPBC or did not express any concerns or issues with the CEIP development and urged the Government to approve the project for the benefit of all South Australians. 1.3 Response Documents On 18 March 2016, DSD and DPTI jointly forwarded a formal “Request for Response” letter to Iron Road together with copies of all public submissions and Government comments received in relation to both the MLP and EIS. Guidance on how Iron Road should respond to each was also provided. All of the questions and areas of concern raised in the public submissions and by SA Government agencies that relate to the MLP have been addressed in this Response Document (refer Attachments A and B respectively) and contributes directly to the assessment of the MLP by DSD. The Response Document will also assist in setting of appropriate conditions should the Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy grant a ML in respect to the CEIP Mine. Page 2 Updated October 2016 Mining Lease Proposal Response Document Iron Road has endeavoured to provide succinct responses to the written questions asked by submitters. Iron Road also commits to continue working with authorities and stakeholders to provide positive outcomes and looks forward to this opportunity should the ML for the CEIP Mine be granted. Mining Lease Proposal Response Document Updated October 2016 Page 3 2 Introduction 2.1 Declaration In accordance with Section 35(1) of the Mining