Phase I Archaeological Survey Along KY 1057 in Powell County, Kentucky

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Phase I Archaeological Survey Along KY 1057 in Powell County, Kentucky Contract Publication Series 17-369 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE PROPOSED KY 1057 SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS IN POWELL COUNTY, KENTUCKY (ITEM NO. 10-9009.00) by Thomas H. McAlpine, Jr., RPA 989402, and Alexandra D. Bybee, RPA 11813 Prepared for Prepared by Kentucky West Virginia Ohio Indiana Louisiana Tennessee Virginia Contract Publication Series 17-369 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE PROPOSED KY 1057 SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS IN POWELL COUNTY, KENTUCKY (ITEM NO. 10-9009.00) by Thomas H. McAlpine, Jr., RPA 989402, and Alexandra D. Bybee, RPA 11813 With contributions by Heather D. Barras, J. Howard Beverly, Jr., RPA 12745, D. Randall Cooper, and Julia K. Gruhot Prepared for David Waldner Division of Environmental Analysis Kentucky Transportation Cabinet 200 Mero Street Frankfort, Kentucky 40622 Phone: (502) 564-7250 Fax: (502) 564-5655 Prepared by Cultural Resource Analysts, Inc. 151 Walton Avenue Lexington, Kentucky 40508 Phone: (859) 252-4737 Fax: (859) 254-3747 Email: [email protected] CRA Project No.: K17K017 __________________________ ________________________ Charles M. Niquette, RPA 10710 Alexandra D. Bybee, RPA 11813 Co-Principal Investigator Co-Principal Investigator November 15, 2017 Lead Agency: Federal Highway Administration Kentucky Transportation Cabinet Item No.:10-9009.00 Letter Agreement 40-MSN OSA Project Registration No.: FY18_9354 ABSTRACT Between October 3 and 5, 2017, Cultural Resource Analysts, Inc., personnel conducted an archaeological survey of the proposed KY 1057 safety improvements project in Powell County, Kentucky (Item No. 10-9009.00). The survey was conducted at the request of David Waldner of the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet. The project area covers approximately 5.4 ha (13.3 acres), including 4.0 ha (9.8 acres) of new right-of-way. The project area was characterized by residential yards, driveways, pastures, an agricultural field, and a wooded area along KY 1057. Prior to the survey, a records review was conducted at the Office of State Archaeology. The review indicated that four previous professional archaeological surveys have been conducted and five archaeological sites have been recorded within a 2.0 km (1.2 mi) radius of the project area. None of these previous survey areas or sites were within the current project area, however Site 15Po98 was reported to be adjacent to the project area. No evidence of Site 15Po98 was found within the project area. The entire project area was subjected to intensive pedestrian survey supplemented with screened shovel testing and a bucket auger. As a result of the survey, one previously unrecorded site (15Po489) and one isolated find (IF 1) were recorded. Site 15Po489 was a multicomponent indeterminate prehistoric open habitation without mounds, and a late-nineteenth- to mid-twentieth-century historic farm/residence consisting of prehistoric and historic artifacts recovered from a few shovel tests. The site is recommended as not eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places and no further work is recommended. IF 1 consisted of two prehistoric flakes from a single shovel test. It is recommended as not eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places and no further work is recommended. No sites listed in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places will be affected by this project; therefore, archaeological clearance is recommended. i TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT .............................................................................................................................................................. i LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................ iii LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................................... iv I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................. 1 II. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING............................................................................................................................. 2 III. PREVIOUS RESEARCH AND CULTURAL OVERVIEW ................................................................................. 21 IV. METHODS ....................................................................................................................................................... 33 V. MATERIALS RECOVERED ............................................................................................................................. 34 VI. RESULTS ........................................................................................................................................................ 41 VII. CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND TREATMENT ...................................................................... 48 REFERENCES CITED .......................................................................................................................................... 49 APPENDIX A. HISTORIC ARTIFACT INVENTORY ........................................................................................... A-1 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Map of Kentucky showing the location of Powell County. ........................................................................ 1 Figure 2. Location of project area on topographic quadrangle. ............................................................................... 3 Figure 3a-d. Project area plan map. ....................................................................................................................... 4 Figure 4. The Eastern Kentucky Coal Field region. .............................................................................................. 11 Figure 5. Rivers that drain the Eastern Kentucky Coal Field region...................................................................... 11 Figure 6. Lawn with driveway, facing south. ......................................................................................................... 17 Figure 7. Underground utility, facing east. ............................................................................................................ 17 Figure 8. Pasture, facing north. ............................................................................................................................. 18 Figure 9. Sloped wooded area, facing north. ........................................................................................................ 18 Figure 10. 1948 map (KSHD 1948) showing MS 1-4. ........................................................................................... 24 Figure 11. Barn at MS 1 area, facing northeast. ................................................................................................... 25 Figure 12. Mobile home at MS 3 area, facing north. ............................................................................................. 25 Figure 13. Residence at MS 4 area, facing east. .................................................................................................. 26 Figure 14. 1952 map (USGS 1952) showing MS 1-7. ........................................................................................... 27 Figure 15. Pasture at MS 5 area, facing south. ..................................................................................................... 28 Figure 16. Residence at MS 6 area, facing northwest. ......................................................................................... 28 Figure 17. Barn at MS 7 area, facing east. ........................................................................................................... 29 Figure 18. Historic materials recovered from Site 15Po489 STP 3, Zone I: (a) unspecified cut nail fragment; (b) undecorated whiteware body sherd; (c) amethyst glass BIM body sherd; and (d) cast-iron (cast) horseshoe with horseshoe nails. .................................................................................................................................... 40 Figure 19. Overview of Site 15Po98 area, facing west. ........................................................................................ 42 Figure 20. Site 15Po489 manicured lawn area, facing south. ............................................................................... 43 Figure 21. Site 15Po489 tall grass field, facing south. .......................................................................................... 43 Figure 22. Schematic plan map of Site 15Po489. ................................................................................................. 46 Figure 23. Representative soil profile from Site 15Po489. .................................................................................... 47 iii Figure 24. IF 1 overview, facing south. ................................................................................................................ 49 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Summary of Selected Information for Previously Recorded Archaeological Sites in Powell County, Kentucky. Data Obtained from OSA and May Contain Coding Errors. ........................................................ 23 Table 2. Prehistoric Materials Recovered. ........................................................................................................... 35 Table 3. Historic Artifacts Recovered According to Functional Group.................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Prehistoric Fire Along the Escarpment Zone of the Cumberland Plateau Cecil R
    Fire on the Edge: Prehistoric Fire Along the Escarpment Zone of the Cumberland Plateau Cecil R. Ison1 Abstract Cumberland Plateau Escarpment Zone Unlike many areas of the United States, anthropogenic fires In Kentucky, conglomeratic sandstones outcrop in a belt are the prime agent for affecting changes in plant and animal ranging from 8 to 40 km wide along the western edge of the species composition in the southern Appalachian Highlands. Cumberland Plateau. Geologically, this area is referred to as Although the extensive use of fire by the American Indians the Pottsville Escarpment. Erosion within this belt has has been recognized from the earliest European observers, created deep narrow stream valleys flanked by steep-sided it is somewhat difficult to determine the impact prehistoric to precipitous valley walls. Little level land is available along fires had on forest structure. By examining the fossil and the stream margins but the ridges, ringed by high sandstone charcoal record from Cliff Palace Pond with the cliffs are fairly wide and flat. Nearly 5000 kilometers of archaeological record recovered from nearby prehistoric cliffline snake through the Daniel Boone National Forest, and sites, a 9,500-year record of the vegetational development often stretch for miles without a break. These natural can be established for the escarpment zone of Eastern features led Miller, in his Geology of Kentucky (1919) to refer Kentucky. This record indicates that anthropogenic fires to the escarpment zone as a “Chinese Wall” that greatly played a central role in shaping the forest structure, inhibited economic development of the area. especially after the transition from a hunting and gathering economy to one based on swidden agricultural practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Red River Daniel Boone National Forest
    :. •.,../ //. -~.~;· ( ./ L\ ./ y . ~ \~· ' ,, DRAFT ENVIRONMENT L IMPACT STATEMENT AND WI LO AND SCE IC RIVER STUDY R~PORT , RED RIVER DANIEL BOONE NATIONAL FOREST Untted Stat" Depar1ment of ForHt Service Agrtcutture Southern Region I : ,_ : ·.it i . DRAFT ENVIRONMENT L IMPACT STATEMENT AND WI LO AND SCE IC RIVER STUDY REPORT RED RIVER DANIEL BOONE NATIONAL FOREST UnHecl St•te1 Dep•rtment of Forest Service AgrlcuHure Southern Region Forest Daniel Boone 1QO Vaught Road Service National Winchester, KY 40391 Forest Reply to: 1920/1950 Date: r L Dear Reviewer: Enclosed for your information and review is the Red River Wild and Scenic River Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS), and Study Report that was transmitted to the Environmental Protection Agency for filing and made available for general public review today. The DEIS evaluates four alternatives for future management of the Red River in Kentucky and identifies a preferred alternative. Comments are welcome and encouraged. Written comments should be sent to the Forest Supervisor at the above address. Public Meetings will be held in Campton, Frenchburg, Lexington, and Stanton.- A schedule and time for these meetings will be announced at a future date. Si nee rely, --I dw~J~ot-#- RICHARD H. WE,~GERT v Forest Superv~ Enclosure ( / FS-ii?00-11 IA-Rill The following Federal agencies, in addition to those listed on page 90 were also sent copies of the DEIS: Department of Defense Department of Health & Human Services Department of the Army Washington, DC Wash mg ton, DC DepartmPnt 0f Tnt~rior D~partrne~t of Housing and Human Services Washington DC Washington, DC Department of Transportation Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Washington, DC Washington, DC Department of Energy Department of Agriculture Washington, DC Soil Conservation Service Department of Commerce Department of Agriculture Washington, DC Rural Electrification Administration In addition, the Governor of the Commonwealth of Kentucky was sent a copy.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification and Evaluation of Forest Sites on the Northern Cumberland Plateau
    .,;;~~~\ United States IttAc.. !)) Department of Classification and Evaluation \:..~ Agriculture Forest Service of Forest Sites on the Southern Forest Northern Cumberland Plateau Experiment Station New Orleans, Louisianfl General rechnical Report SO-60 March 1986 Glendon W. Smalley SUMMARY This paper presents a comprehensive forest site classification system for the northern Cumberland Plateau in north central Tennessee and eastern Ken­ tucky. The system is based on physiography, geology, soils, topography, and vegetation. Twenty-four landtypes are described and evaluated in terms of productivity and desirability of selected pines and hardwoods for timber pro­ duction. Also, each landtype is rated for five soil-related problems that can affect forest management operations. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am indebted to my colleagues, past and present, for their scientific input, reviews, and stimulating discussions. I am also grateful to the soil scientist$, silviculturists, plant ecologists, and practicing foresters who have reviewed this guide. CONTENTS Introduction ..................................................... 1 Northern Cumberland Plateau Region............................. 1 Subregions and LandtypeAssociations ..... ..... ... .. .. ... .. ...... 11 Landtypes ....................................................... 15 Forest Management Interpretations ............................... 16 Using the System ................................................ 17 Landtype Descriptions and Forest Management Interpretations . 23 Literature Cited ..............................
    [Show full text]
  • Variation in Environmental Impact at Rock Climb Areas in Red River Gorge Geological Area and Adjacent Clifty Wilderness, Daniel Boone National Forest, Kentucky
    Variation in Environmental Impact at Rock Climb Areas in Red River Gorge Geological Area and Adjacent Clifty Wilderness, Daniel Boone National Forest, Kentucky A thesis submitted to the Division of Research and Advanced Studies of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of Geography of the College of Arts and Sciences By Christopher Carr B.S., Cornell University, 1974 M.Eng., Cornell University, 1975 Committee: Nicholas Dunning, University of Cincinnati, Chair Robert South, University of Cincinnati Joy Malone, US Forest Service February, 2007 Cincinnati, Ohio Key words: recreation ecology, impact assessment, multiple regression, climbsites, rock climbing, Red River Gorge, Daniel Boone National Forest (ABSTRACT) Rock climbing surged in popularity in the 80’s and 90’s, leading to ecological impacts. This study developed a procedure manual and measured the impact at 16 climb areas, totaling 241 climbs. Mapping showed the impact at the base of the cliff is composed of lines and nodes. The lines are the access trails; the nodes are areas of impact that form at the base of climbs. Because the process is similar to campsite formation, the cliff base nodes are called climbsites. A model to predict climb impact was developed using multiple regression. Sport climbs had nearly three times as much impact as traditional climbs, as well as a different set of predictive factors. Overall, climbing impacted 0.01% of the area and 0.4% of the cliffline of the study area. Climbing causes little avoidable damage; so impact reduction efforts should focus on site hardening and actions to spatially concentrate climbing activities.
    [Show full text]
  • River Values Evaluation for Red Wild and Scenic River
    Red River Values Report River Values Evaluation For Red Wild and Scenic River Figure 1. Photo of the Wild Segment of the Red River (Photo Credit Tim Eling) November 2020 Red River Values Report In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720- 2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632- 9992.
    [Show full text]
  • Coal Reserves Of
    Coal Reserves of GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1120 Prepared in cooperation with the Kentucky Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines Coal Reserves of Eastern Kentucky By J. W. HUDDLE, E. J. LYONS, H. L. SMITH, and J. C. FERM GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1120 Prepared in cooperation with the Kentucky Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1963 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. CONTENTS Page Abstract_______________________________---_-_-_-_--_-___--___-__ 1 Part 1. Preparing the estimates, by J. W. Huddle, E. J. Lyons, H. L. Smith, and J. C. Ferm..______ ..._______ _____ 3 Nature and scope of the report_________---_____-_-_-_____-__-__. 3 Sources of data______________________________________________ 4 Acknowledgments. _----------------___--------------___-----__ 4 Methods of preparing coal reserve estimates______________________ 5 Coal classification__--_--_-_______-_---_-_--_----___---_-__ 6 Rank of coal__--_____-____-______-___-________________ 6 Varieties of coal_______________--____-________.________ 7 Grade ofcoal_------___-_-_-_-_-_--____.______________ 7 Weight of coal-_--___________-_-_-___________________. 8 Thickness of beds___________________________ ______ 8 Thickness of overburden_____________________________ 9 Classification according to abundance and reliability of data.___ 9 Measured reserves__--__-_----__---_______-____________ 9 Indicated reserves_____-___________-_--_--___-_________ 9 Inferred reserves_-__--_-_____________________-_-__---_ 9 Distinction between original, remaining, and recoverable reserves.
    [Show full text]
  • CV Notes July 2016
    Cliffview Resort Owners and Operators of Cliffview Lodge, Cliffview Retreat And Cliffview Lakeside www.CliffviewResort.com 606.668.6222 Your Vacation Respite in the Heart of the Bluegrass State Vol 6 No. 5 Cliffview Resort - Winner of TripAdvisor’s Certificate of Excellence 2013, 2014 and 2015 July 2016 Good News And Even More Good News Bluegrass Happenings Congratulations, Happy Birthday and Welcome !! There are many family events and festivals folks can enjoy year-round in the Bluegrass State, but during the Summer they On Saturday, June 25, 2016 our Executive Director happen almost daily! Amy Sellin became Amy Sellin Meyer! Here are a few within an easy drive from Cliffview Resort. For We wish the happy couple a lifetime of fun, good more activities, log onto kentuckytourism.com/events health and abundant joy! Natural Bridge State Resort Park - Slade KY Rte 11 The famous Natural Bridge Hoedowns have been a popular tra- Celebrating birthdays in July: dition at Natural Bridge for over 45 years! Natural Bridge State Zipline Guide, Greg Frable July 16 Resort Park and square dance caller, Jane Bolin, invite you on Saturdays from now through October to Hoedown Island for Introducing our newest Zipline Guides who have some easy to learn Appalachian square dancing, line dancing, completed our comprehensive and rigorous training two-stepping, polkas, waltzes and other couples and individual course and are anxious to help our guests Zip Away!! : dances. The warm-up dance starts at 6:30 pm and the regular dance program begins at 7:30 pm. Admission is $3.00/person Mahalla Kash- Mahalla just graduated from Lee Co.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vascular Flora of the Red River Gorge in Powell, Menifee, and Wolfe Counties Kentucky
    Eastern Kentucky University Encompass Online Theses and Dissertations Student Scholarship 2018 The Vascular Flora Of The Red River Gorge In Powell, Menifee, And Wolfe Counties Kentucky Thomas Steele McFadden Eastern Kentucky University Follow this and additional works at: https://encompass.eku.edu/etd Part of the Botany Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation McFadden, Thomas Steele, "The Vascular Flora Of The Red River Gorge In Powell, Menifee, And Wolfe Counties Kentucky" (2018). Online Theses and Dissertations. 576. https://encompass.eku.edu/etd/576 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at Encompass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Online Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Encompass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE VASCULAR FLORA OF THE RED RIVER GORGE IN POWELL, MENIFEE, AND WOLFE COUNTIES KENTUCKY BY THOMAS STEELE MCFADDEN Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Eastern Kentucky University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE 2018 © Copyright by THOMAS STEELE MCFADDEN 2018 All Rights Reserved. ii DEDICATION I dedicate this work to my loving parents Dan and Lori McFadden. Without their encouragement and support to follow my passions this would have never been possible. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project would have been impossible without the help of a number of people and organizations. First, I would like to thank my advisor Dr. Brad Ruhfel, as well as my committee members Drs. Jennifer Koslow and Luke Dodd, for their advice and mentorship.
    [Show full text]