CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1815

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) No. 09 CR 830 ) v. ) Judge Harry D. Leinenweber ) ) UNDER SEAL TAHAWWUR HUSSAIN RANA )

GOVERNMENT’S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT RANA’S UNDER SEAL MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE

The United States of America, by and through its attorney, Patrick J. Fitzgerald, United States

Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, respectfully submits this Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant Rana’s Under Seal Motion to Suppress Evidence.

I. Background

The defendant moves to suppress the results of three search warrants, arguing that the affiant omitted material information from the affidavit submitted in support of the application for such warrants. More specifically, the defendant points to the fact , when arrested, first stated that Rana was not witting of his criminal activities and then later refused to answer any questions about Rana (as well as Headley’s wife), noting that Rana was his “only friend.”

Considering the substantial volume of information in the affidavit that established probable cause to believe that evidence would be recovered at the three physical addresses, the omission of this information was not material. Even had the statements, and refusals to make statements, about Rana had been included in the affidavit, probable cause to believe that evidence existed at these locations still existed. For this reason, the Court should deny defendant’s motion without a hearing.

1 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 2 of 13 PageID #:1816

A. The Government Obtained Two Sets of Search Warrants

On October 2, 2009, the government sought five search warrants based on a single affidavit for the following locations:

• 09 M 479: Rana’s business (the business identified as the Immigrant Law Center, located at 2809 W. Devon, Chicago, Illinois)

• 09 M 480: Headley’s luggage

• 09 M 481: Rana’s residence Illinois)

• 09 M 482: Rana’s farm property (the farm property located at 6260 S. Kinsman Road, Kinsman, Illinois)

• 09 M 483: Headley’s residence (the apartment located at llinois)

The 65-page affidavit submitted in support of the applications for these search warrants outlined a substantial amount of evidence, including intercepted emails, recorded telephone conversations, recorded in-person conversations, public records, information from a Customs and Border Patrol inspector, phone records, physical surveillance, records reflecting the location of internet protocol addresses, subscriber records and information from other sources. Based on this information,

Magistrate Judge Keys determined that there was probable cause to believe that evidence of federal crimes would be found at the addresses and issued the search warrants. Attached hereto as Exhibit

A is a copy of the affidavit submitted on October 2, 2009.

The following day, on October 3, 2009, federal agents arrested David Headley at O’Hare airport, where he was to board a flight to Philadelphia with the ultimate destination being .

2 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 3 of 13 PageID #:1817

After his arrest, Headley agreed to be interviewed by FBI agents.1 Because Headley had agreed to be interviewed and because this interview lasted a number of days, the government did not execute the search warrants for the physical addresses. Instead, the government executed only the search warrant on Headley’s luggage. Found in Headley’s luggage, among other pieces of evidence, was a memory stick containing surveillance videos taken in Copenhagen, Denmark.

Anticipating the expiration of the unexecuted search warrants, on October 9, 2009, the government again sought search warrants for four of the five above-identified premises (all but

Headley’s luggage). The information provided in the applications on October 9, 2009, was substantially similar to that information submitted in support of the October 2, 2009 applications, except that information relating to what was found in Headley’s luggage and approximately six paragraphs summarizing information by Headley were added. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a copy of the single affidavit submitted in support of the October 9, 2009 applications.

On October 18, 2009, federal agents arrested the defendant and executed the search warrants at the four physical addresses. The defendant now moves to suppress evidence obtained during the execution of three of these search warrants, those for his residence, his business and his farm.

B. Evidence in the Affidavit

As mentioned, the 75-page affidavit submitted in support of the request for search warrants contained information from a variety of sources, but mainly described intercepted emails and recorded conversations that established probable cause to believe that Headley and others participated in a conspiracy to commit terrorist attacks involving murder, kidnaping and maiming

1 Having obtained the search warrants prior to Headley’s arrest, the affidavit submitted in support of the October 2, 2009 applications for search warrants, of course, included no information provided by Headley.

3 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 4 of 13 PageID #:1818

outside the United States, including , India and Copenhagen, Denmark, and that defendant

Rana conspired to provide material support to that conspiracy. In summary,2 emails exchanged between Headley and co-defendant Abdur Rehman Hashim Syed (“Pasha”) in late 2008 and early

2009 revealed that Headley intended to travel to Copenhagen in January 2009 in order to conduct surveillance and “get a feel for the property.” (Ex. B, ¶59) An intercepted email also demonstrated that Headley had typed a list of items to prepare for this trip, which was titled “Mickey Mouse” and contained multiple entries that were consistent with his task to perform surveillance. (Id. ¶51)

During the email exchanges, Headley and Pasha discussed Rana and, in particular, Headley expressed his readiness for “MMP” (the Mickey Mouse Project), but indicated that he needed to consult with Rana before he traveled. (Id. ¶59) Subsequent email correspondence revealed that Rana arranged for Headley’s travel to Denmark. (Id. ¶61)

Headley Requests Rana’s Assistance During his First Reconnaissance Trip to Copenhagen

Additional email correspondence demonstrated that Headley, in fact, traveled to Copenhagen in January 2009 and visited two locations of the Jyllands Posten newspaper, which had published cartoons depicting the Prophet Mohammed in 2005 and toward whom Headley had expressed a disposition for violence in a forum for alumni of a Pakistani school where both Headley and Rana had attended. (Id. ¶¶48-50, 60-67) Email correspondence established that Headley had gained entry to the newspaper facilities by falsely representing himself to be a representative of Rana’s business.

Headley, in fact, informed Rana by email that he had provided a card identifying himself as a representative of Rana’s business and, based on a concern that the newspaper would contact other

2 The government adopts as though stated herein the allegations of the affidavit submitted in support of the application for search warrants. Due to the volume of information therein, this Response provides only a summary.

4 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 5 of 13 PageID #:1819

offices listed on such card, Headley asked Rana to ask the other offices to “remember” him such that his cover was not blown. (Id. ¶¶62-64) When the newspaper emailed Headley following his visit,

Rana falsely posed as David Headley and sent a reply email. (Id. ¶67) The affidavit cited a number of facts (established through several sources) that demonstrated it was implausible that Headley was visiting the newspapers for business reasons. (Id. ¶69)

Rana’s Creation of Coded Account

The affidavit further outlined, based on email correspondence and subscriber records, that

Rana passed a coded message to Headley in March 2009, stating:

One of my brothers in Brigadier Movadat Hussain Rana and the other is Sibte Hassan Rana monie. They are in Rawalpindi. I really admire emails making it instant half mulaquat especially yahoo as it seems superior to hotmail. Talk to you later.

(Id. ¶73)(emphasis supplied). Subscriber records revealed that the mov.monie@yahoo account was created on or about March 6, 2009, at a particular internet protocol address, the user of which was located at the business address of Rana’s business, First World Immigration. The subscriber name provided when this account was opened was “Mr Mov Monie” with a date of birth of February 13,

1962. RANA’s actual birthdate is exactly one digit off from the month, date and year provided to open the mov.monie@yahoo account. In a subsequent email, Headley asked Rana to contact Pasha, with whom Headley had been communicating extensively about the “Mickey Mouse Project.” (Id.

¶¶54-59, 75) When Headley later returned to Chicago, Rana once again arranged for his travel. (Id.

¶78)

Concern Over Pasha’s Arrest

Email correspondence later established that Pasha was arrested by Pakistani authorities in or around mid-July 2009. (Id. ¶79). In later email correspondence with Headley, an individual

5 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 6 of 13 PageID #:1820

identified in the affidavit as Lashkar Member A (Sajid Mir) expressed concern over the arrest of

Pasha and, more specifically, whether he was “singing or what.” (Id. ¶¶99-100). After Pasha’s release from custody, Headley and Pasha engaged in numerous recorded telephone conversations, as summarized below. Additionally, Rana spoke to Pasha in a recorded telephone call. Using code,

Rana asked Pasha about his arrest: “okay, you remember when you had fever during that time did you ever faint due to the fever?” Pasha responded, “no, no, no, no, no, no. Th-th-that all was fine, there wasn’t any problem” (Id. ¶105)

Communications with Lashkar Member Sajid

The affidavit further described a series of email communications between Headley and

Lashkar Member A that occurred throughout July and August of 2009. In the coded exchanges,

Lashkar Member A indicated that he wanted to see Headley in order to discuss additional surveillance activity in India. (Id. ¶¶80-92, 98-100). Further, the emails alluded to Headley’s previous surveillance activity in Mumbai and reflected Headley’s questions about the “Northern

Project,” another codename for the planning of an attack in Copenhagen, which the emails had revealed was postponed by Lashkar Member A. Among other statements referring to Headley’s prior surveillance work in Mumbai, Headley asked “the visit to Rahul’s place [India], is it for checking out real estate property like before.” (Id. ¶88)

Second Reconnaissance Trip to Copenhagen

The affidavit also described Headley’s second surveillance trip to Copenhagen. While in

Copenhagen, Headley took short videos of several locations in Copenhagen. When later arrested (in

October 2009), the government seized these videos from Headley’s luggage. (Id. ¶128) As before,

Rana made travel arrangements for Headley. Upon his return, Headley falsely told a Customs and

6 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 7 of 13 PageID #:1821

Border Inspector that he was a consultant for Rana’s business. (Id. ¶95)

As described in more detail in the complaint, throughout August and September, Headley and

Pasha spoke by phone and otherwise communicated about continued planning for an attack in

Denmark. They awaited word from Ilyas Kashmiri, with whom Headley and Pasha had discussed the potential attack. Headley discussed options, including Option “B” (“I [Headley] can do it on my own”) if communications with “doctor [Kashmiri] failed or if the “doctor” and his people were otherwise unable to assist (“if they are not fulfilling on it”). (Id. ¶103) Further, on September 7,

2009, Headley and Pasha talked about whether Pasha had been able to convey certain information to Kashmiri (Headley: “you need to tell him everything”). (Id., ¶107) That same day, Headley and

Rana discussed the same issue. Headley explained to Rana that “Pasha has not been able to pass on the report to him [Kashmiri].” (Id. ¶109)

Rana and Headley Discuss “Targets”

In the same September 7, 2009 conversation between Rana and Headley, they discussed and named multiple targets of their planning. Headley listed four targets, one of which was “Denmark.”

(Id. ¶110) Later in the conversation, Headley added a fifth target: “oh my friend, not four, five, five.” (Id.) While Rana laughed, Headley stated “Defense College” twice, and Rana commented

“right, this is it. I knew already.” After other discussion, Rana continued “That one, uh, I thought that was the target.” Although this conversation was mainly in , Rana used the English word

“target.” (Id.)

Rana and Headley Discuss News of Kashmiri

Later in September, there were press reports that Ilyas Kashmiri was killed in a drone attack.

On September 14, 2009, Headley related the news to Rana, who responded “pray that this should not

7 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 8 of 13 PageID #:1822

have happened.” (Id. ¶113) Following the news of Kashmiri’s alleged death (the reports turned out to be inaccurate), Headley and Pasha discussed returning to Lashkar Member Sajid Mir to continue planning for the Denmark attack, but (referring to the above-described emails) Headley noted that

Sajid was focused on India (“their eyes are again in that direction”). (Id. ¶117)

On September 18, 2009, Headley forwarded a news article about Kashmiri to Rana. (Id.

¶¶28, 120) Among other details, the article identified Kashmiri as one of the most dangerous al Qaeda-linked Pakistani commanders, that he had been charged with murder and kidnaping, and that he was number 4 on Pakistan’s Most Wanted List. (Id.) After learning a few days later that

Kashmiri was alive after all, Rana reacted to the news: “wow, all praise be to God.” (Id. ¶126)

Headley also learned that Kashmiri was asking about him (Headley), and Headley had plans to travel to Pakistan. (Id. ¶¶125, 127)

Before Headley traveled to Pakistan, Rana made efforts to obtain a visa for Headley by contacting the Consul General at the Pakistani Consulate in Chicago. Rana, Headley and the Consul

General all went to school together, however, the Consul General knew Headley only by his birth name (Gilani). Despite the fact that they knew each other, Rana stated only that he wished to obtain a visa for a white American who had no Pakistani background at all. When the Consul General suggested that Rana send his friend to the Consulate, Rana explained that he sent his friend elsewhere to take care of some unspecified business so that someone else would visit. It was clear from the conversation that Rana was attempting to deceive the Consul General into issuing the visa without knowing for whom the visa was issued. (Id. ¶ 124) A few days later, agents arrested

Headley at O’Hare Airport, where he was intending to travel to Pakistan after stopping in

Philadelphia. (Id. ¶¶128)

8 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 9 of 13 PageID #:1823

Search Locations

Based on the evidence outlined in the affidavit, the government submitted that there was probable cause to believe that evidence would be found in the search locations. As to Rana’s residence, among other relevant facts (including evidence of tax violations), the government noted that physical and electronic surveillance had established that Headley had visited Rana’s residence on multiple occasions. (Id. ¶142) Further, there was evidence to believe that emails, including the above-described email to the Jyllands-Posten where Rana posed as Headley to assist his ruse of being interested in an ad, were sent from that location. (Id. ¶144) As to Rana’s farm, among other relevant facts, the government noted that surveillance had observed Headley and Rana at this location. (Id. ¶155) Further, records established that Headley used computers at the farm to access his email accounts. (Id. ¶ 156) As to Rana’s business, among other relevant facts (including evidence of immigration and visa fraud), the government noted that physical surveillance had observed that Headley frequently visited that location throughout August and September 2009. (Id.

¶161) Further, as mentioned above, emails and other evidence established that Headley had used

First World as a cover story for his extended stays in Mumbai. Lastly, records established that the mov.monie@yahoo account was created at that address. (Id. ¶162)

II. The District Court Should Deny Defendant’s Motion to Suppress

A. Legal Standard for Motion to Suppress

The Fourth Amendment requires, absent certain exceptions, that the government obtain a search warrant from a neutral and disinterested magistrate before commencing a search. United

States v. Robinson, 546 F.3d 884, 887-88 (7th Cir. 2008). In seeking a search warrant, the government must establish, considering the totality of the circumstances, that there is sufficient

9 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 10 of 13 PageID #:1824

evidence to cause a reasonably prudent person to believe that a search will uncover evidence of a crime. Id. This is a common-sense, non-technical determination based not on individual facts, but on the totality of the circumstances known at the time the warrant is requested. United States v.

Aljabari, 626 F.3d 940, 944 (7th Cir. 2010). The circumstances need only indicate a reasonable probability that evidence of a crime will be found in a particular location; neither an absolute certainty nor a preponderance of the evidence is necessary. Id. The Seventh Circuit has made clear that direct evidence linking a crime to a particular place is not necessary. Id. The affidavit need only contain facts that, given the nature of the evidence sought and the crime alleged, allow for a reasonable inference that there is a fair possibility that evidence will be found at a particular place.

Id.

The Fourth Amendment further requires an evidentiary hearing regarding the veracity of the information included in an application for a search warrant if the defendant is able to make a

“substantial preliminary showing that a false statement knowingly and intentionally made, or with reckless disregard for the truth, was included by the affiant in the affidavit, and if the allegedly false statement is necessary to the finding of probable cause.” Robinson, 546 F.3d at 887-88 (quoting

Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 155-546 (1978) (emphasis supplied)) A defendant similarly may challenge an affidavit by showing that the affiant intentionally or recklessly omitted material information. Robinson, 546 F.3d at 888. Here, defendant does not allege that any intentionally false statements were included in the application; instead, defendant asserts that the affidavits intentionally or recklessly omitted material information, namely, statements made by Headley during his post- arrest questioning.

In determining whether the omitted information is material, the court “examine[s] whether

10 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 11 of 13 PageID #:1825

a hypothetical affidavit that included the omitted material would still establish probable cause.”

Robinson, 546 F.3d at 888. “[A]n omitted detail is ‘material’ only if its inclusion would upset a finding of probable cause.” United States v. McDuffy, 636 F.3d 361, 363 (7th Cir. 2011).

B. A Hypothetical Affidavit with Headley’s Post-Arrest Statements Would Still Establish Probable Cause

In his motion, defendant does very little to address the evidence outlined in the 75-page affidavit submitted in support of the application for the search warrants. Instead, defendant essentially argues that the government lacked probable cause to search the three locations associated with Rana (his residence, farm and business) because his friend, Headley, offered innocent explanations for Rana and simply refused to discuss Rana. Headley explained: “I just have only one friend, that’s Dr. Rana.” Headley further stated:

. . . he’s the only one [friend]. . . . And uh, and I would not like to answer questions about either him or my wife. . . . Because um . . . they’re not, uh, they’re not involved in anything . . . and if . . . if, you’re going to, I have to say I know . . . they, they do know something . . . it’s, it’s . . . like my wife knows something or Dr. Rana knows something . . . it’s just because of their closeness to me, and they should, I don’t feel that they should uh, uh you know, be targeted not only for . . . for, for that, that’s it.

(Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a preliminary transcript of Headley’s video-taped post-arrest statement, at USDOJ_ 04-945-96). Shortly after identifying him as his only friend, Headley again stated that he did not want to talk about Rana:

And I also mentioned that anything that’s incriminating Dr. Rana . . . uh, I’m not gonna . . .anything else you want me to do, I’ll give my life.

(Ex. C, USDOJ_04-1144) Defendant’s argument that the omission of such statements was material is flawed for several reasons.

First, the Seventh Circuit has made clear that the offering of an innocent explanation does

11 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 12 of 13 PageID #:1826

not negate probable cause, especially where the totality of the circumstances shows the explanation to be unlikely or even implausible. Reed, 443 F.3d at 603; Funches, 327 F.3d at 587. Here, the totality of the evidence overwhelmingly established probable cause to believe that Rana knowingly provided and concealed the material support provided to Headley’s efforts, regardless of Headley’s statements. As described above, the emails, recorded conversations (including their discussion of

“Denmark” as a “target”), physical evidence, surveillance and records discussed in the affidavit established this probable cause. As the Court noted in deciding Rana’s request for a bond, the

“evidence in the form of recorded conversations, while not conclusive, appears to corroborate the

Government’s contention that [Rana] was a knowing ally of Headley and had been acquainted in advance of the Mumbai attacks.” (R. 69 at 1) Inclusion of Headley’s statements, or refusals to make statements, would not have negated the probable cause established by these recordings, emails and other evidence.

Second, independent of Rana’s complicity, the evidence established that there was probable cause to believe that evidence of the articulated offenses would be found at each of the search locations. Surveillance established that Headley frequented each of the locations. Records demonstrated that Headley used the computer at the farm to access email accounts. The evidence also established that a communication with the Jyllands-Posten, the target of the planning, was sent from Rana’s residence. Lastly, considering Headley’s use of the Immigrant Law Center as his cover, there was probable cause to believe that there would be evidence at that office, including records relevant to the operation of the Mumbai office. Once again, inclusion of Headley’s statements would not have negated the probable cause.

Third, the record demonstrates that the Magistrate’s determination that probable cause

12 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 13 of 13 PageID #:1827

existed had little to do with what Headley said or did not say. Indeed, the Magistrate Judge found that probable cause existed to believe that evidence would be found at the search locations before

Headley ever said a word. (Exhibit A)

In short, considering the totality of the evidence outlined in the 75-page affidavit, the government submits that a Court would still have found that probable cause existed when considering a hypothetical affidavit that contained Headley’s explanations or refusals relating to

Rana. The omissions were not material and, as such, the defendant has failed to meet his burden in requesting an evidentiary hearing. McDuffy, 636 F.3d at 364 (affirming the denial of a Franks hearing based on its consideration of a hypothetical affidavit); Robinson, 546 F.3d at 887-88

(affirming denial of a Franks hearing based on consideration of a hypothetical affidavit).

WHEREFORE, the government respectfully requests that defendant’s motion be denied.

Respectfully submitted,

PATRICK J. FITZGERALD United States Attorney

By:/s/ Daniel J. Collins DANIEL J. COLLINS VICTORIA J. PETERS SARAH E. STREICKER Assistant United States Attorney 219 South Dearborn Street,5th Floor Chicago, Illinois 60604 (312) 886-3482

13 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 1 of 66 PageID #:1828

EXHIBIT A CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 2 of 66 PageID #:1829 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 3 of 66 PageID #:1830 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 4 of 66 PageID #:1831 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 5 of 66 PageID #:1832 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 6 of 66 PageID #:1833 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 7 of 66 PageID #:1834 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 8 of 66 PageID #:1835 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 9 of 66 PageID #:1836 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 10 of 66 PageID #:1837 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 11 of 66 PageID #:1838 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 12 of 66 PageID #:1839 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 13 of 66 PageID #:1840 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 14 of 66 PageID #:1841 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 15 of 66 PageID #:1842 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 16 of 66 PageID #:1843 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 17 of 66 PageID #:1844 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 18 of 66 PageID #:1845 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 19 of 66 PageID #:1846 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 20 of 66 PageID #:1847 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 21 of 66 PageID #:1848 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 22 of 66 PageID #:1849 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 23 of 66 PageID #:1850 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 24 of 66 PageID #:1851 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 25 of 66 PageID #:1852 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 26 of 66 PageID #:1853 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 27 of 66 PageID #:1854 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 28 of 66 PageID #:1855 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 29 of 66 PageID #:1856 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 30 of 66 PageID #:1857 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 31 of 66 PageID #:1858 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 32 of 66 PageID #:1859 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 33 of 66 PageID #:1860 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 34 of 66 PageID #:1861 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 35 of 66 PageID #:1862 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 36 of 66 PageID #:1863 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 37 of 66 PageID #:1864 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 38 of 66 PageID #:1865 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 39 of 66 PageID #:1866 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 40 of 66 PageID #:1867 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 41 of 66 PageID #:1868 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 42 of 66 PageID #:1869 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 43 of 66 PageID #:1870 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 44 of 66 PageID #:1871 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 45 of 66 PageID #:1872 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 46 of 66 PageID #:1873 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 47 of 66 PageID #:1874 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 48 of 66 PageID #:1875 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 49 of 66 PageID #:1876 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 50 of 66 PageID #:1877 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 51 of 66 PageID #:1878 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 52 of 66 PageID #:1879 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 53 of 66 PageID #:1880 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 54 of 66 PageID #:1881 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 55 of 66 PageID #:1882 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 56 of 66 PageID #:1883 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 57 of 66 PageID #:1884 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 58 of 66 PageID #:1885 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 59 of 66 PageID #:1886 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 60 of 66 PageID #:1887 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 61 of 66 PageID #:1888 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 62 of 66 PageID #:1889 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 63 of 66 PageID #:1890 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 64 of 66 PageID #:1891 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 65 of 66 PageID #:1892 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 66 of 66 PageID #:1893 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 1 of 76 PageID #:1894

EXHIBIT B CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 2 of 76 PageID #:1895 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 3 of 76 PageID #:1896 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 4 of 76 PageID #:1897 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 5 of 76 PageID #:1898 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 6 of 76 PageID #:1899 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 7 of 76 PageID #:1900 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 8 of 76 PageID #:1901 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 9 of 76 PageID #:1902 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 10 of 76 PageID #:1903 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 11 of 76 PageID #:1904 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 12 of 76 PageID #:1905 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 13 of 76 PageID #:1906 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 14 of 76 PageID #:1907 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 15 of 76 PageID #:1908 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 16 of 76 PageID #:1909 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 17 of 76 PageID #:1910 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 18 of 76 PageID #:1911 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 19 of 76 PageID #:1912 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 20 of 76 PageID #:1913 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 21 of 76 PageID #:1914 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 22 of 76 PageID #:1915 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 23 of 76 PageID #:1916 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 24 of 76 PageID #:1917 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 25 of 76 PageID #:1918 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 26 of 76 PageID #:1919 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 27 of 76 PageID #:1920 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 28 of 76 PageID #:1921 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 29 of 76 PageID #:1922 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 30 of 76 PageID #:1923 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 31 of 76 PageID #:1924 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 32 of 76 PageID #:1925 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 33 of 76 PageID #:1926 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 34 of 76 PageID #:1927 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 35 of 76 PageID #:1928 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 36 of 76 PageID #:1929 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 37 of 76 PageID #:1930 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 38 of 76 PageID #:1931 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 39 of 76 PageID #:1932 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 40 of 76 PageID #:1933 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 41 of 76 PageID #:1934 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 42 of 76 PageID #:1935 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 43 of 76 PageID #:1936 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 44 of 76 PageID #:1937 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 45 of 76 PageID #:1938 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 46 of 76 PageID #:1939 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 47 of 76 PageID #:1940 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 48 of 76 PageID #:1941 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 49 of 76 PageID #:1942 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 50 of 76 PageID #:1943 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 51 of 76 PageID #:1944 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 52 of 76 PageID #:1945 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 53 of 76 PageID #:1946 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 54 of 76 PageID #:1947 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 55 of 76 PageID #:1948 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 56 of 76 PageID #:1949 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 57 of 76 PageID #:1950 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 58 of 76 PageID #:1951 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 59 of 76 PageID #:1952 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 60 of 76 PageID #:1953 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 61 of 76 PageID #:1954 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 62 of 76 PageID #:1955 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 63 of 76 PageID #:1956 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 64 of 76 PageID #:1957 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 65 of 76 PageID #:1958 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 66 of 76 PageID #:1959 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 67 of 76 PageID #:1960 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 68 of 76 PageID #:1961 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 69 of 76 PageID #:1962 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 70 of 76 PageID #:1963 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 71 of 76 PageID #:1964 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 72 of 76 PageID #:1965 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 73 of 76 PageID #:1966 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 74 of 76 PageID #:1967 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 75 of 76 PageID #:1968 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 76 of 76 PageID #:1969 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-3 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:1970

EXHIBIT C CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-3 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:1971 CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT

Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-3 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:1972