DOCSLIB.ORG

Investigation Into the Implications of Zooarchaeological Studies for Climate Reconstruction in the No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Investigation Into the Implications of Zooarchaeological Studies for Climate Reconstruction in the No SIT Graduate Institute/SIT Study Abroad SIT Digital Collections Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection SIT Study Abroad Fall 2016 Independent Study Project: Investigation into the implications of zooarchaeological studies for climate reconstruction in the North Atlantic; zooarchaeological research at the Agricultural University of Iceland, Reykjavík Hazel Cashman SIT Study Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection Part of the Animal Studies Commons, Eastern European Studies Commons, Human Geography Commons, Nature and Society Relations Commons, Place and Environment Commons, and the Scandinavian Studies Commons Recommended Citation Cashman, Hazel, "Independent Study Project: Investigation into the implications of zooarchaeological studies for climate reconstruction in the North Atlantic; zooarchaeological research at the Agricultural University of Iceland, Reykjavík" (2016). Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection. 2451. https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/2451 This Unpublished Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the SIT Study Abroad at SIT Digital Collections. It has been accepted for inclusion in Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection by an authorized administrator of SIT Digital Collections. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Independent Study Project: Investigation into the implications of zooarchaeological studies for climate reconstruction in the North Atlantic; zooarchaeological research at the Agricultural University of Iceland, Reykjavík Hazel M. Cashman, Bates College School for International Training, Iceland and Greenland Climate Change and the Arctic Fall 2016 Academic Director: Ragnar Honeth Project Advisor: Albína Hulda Pálsdóttir Table of Contents Section Page Abstract……………………………………………………………………… 1 Research Question……………...…………………………………………… 1 Acknowledgements…………...…………………………………………….. 1 1.0 – Introduction…...………………………………………………………. 2 1.1 – Objectives……………………………………………………... 4 1.2 – Justification…………………………………………………… 4 2.0 – Methods…...…………………………………………………………... 5 2.1 – Ethics………………………………………………………….. 6 2.2 – Defleshing…………………………………………………….. 6 2.3 – Water Maceration……………………………………………... 7 2.4 – Cleaning………………………………………………………. 9 2.5 – Storage………………………………………………………... 11 2.6 – Cataloging…………………………………………………….. 14 3.0 – The Importance of Comparative Osteological Collections………….. 15 3.1 – Proper Care and Maintenance of Reference Collections…….. 16 3.2 – Reference Collection at the Agricultural University of Iceland 17 4.0 – Background on Archaeological Practices and Concepts……………… 18 4.1 – Sampling and Recording Data from an Excavation………….. 19 4.2 – Understanding Taphonomy…………………………………… 20 4.3 – Identifying Specimens………………………………………… 23 4.4 – Sources of Bias……………………………………………….. 24 4.5 – Frequently Used Quantification Methods…………………….. 25 5.0 – Reconstruction of Past Climates: Evidence of Past Environmental Conditions ……………………………………………………………………… 25 5.1 – Using Faunal Data in the Study of Past Climates……………. 26 5.2 – Examples: Using Faunal Data to Reconstruct Past Climates… 28 6.0 – Archaeology and Zooarchaeology in the North Atlantic…………….. 28 6.1 – Case Study: Norse Greenland………………………………… 29 6.2 – Climatic Reconstruction in Iceland: Archaeology and Zooarchaeology ……………………………………………………………………… 32 6.3 – Case Study: Hofstaðir………………………………………… 33 7.0 – Conclusions…………………………………………………………… 35 References………………………………………………………………….. 36 1 Abstract Zooarchaeology, the study of animal remains from archaeological sites, is crucial to the understanding of human interaction with the environment in the North Atlantic region and in Iceland, where the archaeological record is quite rich (Dugmore et al., 2005). Since its inception, zooarchaeology has drawn methods and concepts from both the natural and social sciences, as well as from history and the humanities, to inform an interdisciplinary understanding of the interactions between humans and their environments and the consequences of these interactions for humans and animals (Reitz and Wing, 2008). In this way, zooarchaeology can inform discussions about historical anthropogenic relationships to animals and the environment, and these relationships can be used to develop adaptation and mitigation strategies in this time of rapid environmental change (McGovern et al., 2007). An integrated adaptation approach requires knowledge of contextual history and cultural environmental landscape that only archaeology, and particularly zooarchaeology, can provide (McGovern et al., 2007). This study investigated the relationship between zooarchaeology and climate science through a literature review and work on the osteological reference collection at the Agricultural University of Iceland. The information provided here serves as an introduction to basic zooarchaeological methods, as well as to the importance of comparative osteological reference collections and to the significant role zooarchaeology plays in environmental reconstruction across the North Atlantic. Research Question How can zooarchaeology inform our understanding of both past and present human relationships to the North Atlantic environment in the context of global climate change, and what role do reference collections play in the zooarchaeological understanding of historical human relationships to animals in this region? Acknowledgements I would first and foremost like to thank Albína Hulda Pálsdóttir at the Agricultural University of Iceland for her incredible help and support throughout this project. Albína opened up her work and research facilities to me and lent invaluable guidance in the process of my literature review, and her work helped introduce me to the field of zooarchaeology and has provided me with a fantastic opportunity to gain experience in a zooarchaeological research setting. I would additionally like to thank Professor Gerry Bigelow of Bates College for first introducing me to archaeology and fostering my interest in the archaeology of the North Atlantic; I would not have been lead to this amazing project if it were not for his enthusiastic teaching back at Bates. Many thanks also to the National Museum of Iceland for their incredible exhibit on Iceland’s archaeological history; the collection housed there allowed me to see the artifacts I had read about in previous classes. Thank you to my roommates Sophie Leiter, Bertie Miller, Michaela Stith, Molly Peek, and Maddie Grant for listening to me constantly talk about bones, and finally, thank you to the incredibly kind Strætó bus driver who helped me navigate to the Agricultural University on the first day of my project; I would’ve been lost without you. 1 1.0 – Introduction “The argument that human beings can exist and act independently of their environments is a fallacy deeply rooted in Western culture.” -Dena F. Dincauze Archaeological research in the North Atlantic region is characterized by an intersection of archaeology and paleoclimatology around the historical ecology movement (McGovern, Vesteinsson, Fridriksson, Church, Lawson, Simpson, Einarsson, Dugmore, Cook, Perdikaris, Edwards, Thomson, Adderley, Newton, Lucas, Edvardsson, Aldred, and Dunbar, 2007). The theories of this movement are being used to connect the long-term record of human-environment interaction with present issues of rapid climate change and human responses, with the aim of integrating archaeology and environmental history in to global climate research and combining interdisciplinary environmental archaeology with concern for contextual history and cultural landscape (McGovern et al., 2007). Organisms and their environments are inextricably interrelated, which means that past conditions will continue to shape the present and the future of these relationships (Dincauze, 2000). Emerging from these studies is the holistic view that the relationship between cultural systems, human populations, and their environments is complex and interactive (Reitz and Wing, 2008). As a part of the historical ecology movement and as a result of this interrelationship, zooarchaeology is becoming increasingly important. It is becoming increasingly apparent that humans are the dominant forcers of change in environments that they occupy. Consequently, their environments reflect, amplify, and/or dampen change, and this causes the need for adaptation in human populations and in animal populations (Dincauze, 2000). Ecology has repeatedly shown that static assumptions about the nature of environments are maladaptive, due to this constant change (Dincauze, 2000). In Quaternary time, the dominant mode of successful adaptation among many species has been range adjustment (Dincauze, 2000). The Human Mode of Adaption (HMA, a term used by Dincauze in her book titled Environmental Archaeology: principles and practice to describe how humans respond to and simultaneously enact environmental change) has become a major source of environmental perturbation in this century, yet archaeology shows that the effects of HMA are as old as the genus Homo (Dincauze, 2000). The false dichotomization of nature and culture exemplified in the quote at the beginning of this paper is embraced and perpetuated by modern development economics, and supported by religion and technological ideologies (Dincauze, 2000). Considering the modern context of rapid environmental change, it is far more productive to shift the research orientation of archaeology towards a focus on human impacts on environments at the local scale rather than
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Köppen Signatures” of Fossil Plant Assemblages for Effective Heat Transport of Gulf Stream to Subarctic North Atlantic During Miocene Cooling
    Biogeosciences, 10, 7927–7942, 2013 Open Access www.biogeosciences.net/10/7927/2013/ doi:10.5194/bg-10-7927-2013 Biogeosciences © Author(s) 2013. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Evidence from “Köppen signatures” of fossil plant assemblages for effective heat transport of Gulf Stream to subarctic North Atlantic during Miocene cooling T. Denk1, G. W. Grimm1, F. Grímsson2, and R. Zetter2 1Swedish Museum of Natural History, Department of Palaeobiology, Box 50007, 10405 Stockholm, Sweden 2University of Vienna, Department of Palaeontology, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria Correspondence to: T. Denk ([email protected]) Received: 8 July 2013 – Published in Biogeosciences Discuss.: 15 August 2013 Revised: 29 October 2013 – Accepted: 2 November 2013 – Published: 6 December 2013 Abstract. Shallowing of the Panama Sill and the closure 1 Introduction of the Central American Seaway initiated the modern Loop Current–Gulf Stream circulation pattern during the Miocene, The Mid-Miocene Climatic Optimum (MMCO) at 17–15 but no direct evidence has yet been provided for effec- million years (Myr) was the last phase of markedly warm cli- tive heat transport to the northern North Atlantic during mate in the Cenozoic (Zachos et al., 2001). The MMCO was that time. Climatic signals from 11 precisely dated plant- followed by the Mid-Miocene Climate Transition (MMCT) bearing sedimentary rock formations in Iceland, spanning at 14.2–13.8 Myr correlated with the growth of the East 15–0.8 million years (Myr), resolve the impacts of the devel- Antarctic Ice Sheet (Shevenell et al., 2004). In the Northern oping Miocene global thermohaline circulation on terrestrial Hemisphere this cooling is reflected by continuous sea ice in vegetation in the subarctic North Atlantic region.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioarchaeology (Anthropological Archaeology) - Mario ŠLAUS
    PHYSICAL (BIOLOGICAL) ANTHROPOLOGY - Bioarchaeology (Anthropological Archaeology) - Mario ŠLAUS BIOARCHAEOLOGY (ANTHROPOLOGICAL ARCHAEOLOGY) Mario ŠLAUS Department of Archaeology, Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Zagreb, Croatia. Keywords: Bioarchaeology, archaeological, forensic, antemortem, post-mortem, perimortem, traumas, Cribra orbitalia, Harris lines, Tuberculosis, Leprosy, Treponematosis, Trauma analysis, Accidental trauma, Intentional trauma, Osteological, Degenerative disease, Habitual activities, Osteoarthritis, Schmorl’s nodes, Tooth wear Contents 1. Introduction 1.1. Definition of Bioarchaeology 1.2. History of Bioarchaeology 2. Analysis of Skeletal Remains 2.1. Excavation and Recovery 2.2. Human / Non-Human Remains 2.3. Archaeological / Forensic Remains 2.4. Differentiating between Antemortem/Postmortem/Perimortem Traumas 2.5. Determination of Sex 2.6. Determination of Age at Death 2.6.1. Age Determination in Subadults 2.6.2. Age Determination in Adults. 3. Skeletal and dental markers of stress 3.1. Linear Enamel Hypoplasia 3.2. Cribra Orbitalia 3.3. Harris Lines 4. Analyses of dental remains 4.1. Caries 4.2. Alveolar Bone Disease and Antemortem Tooth Loss 5. Infectious disease 5.1. Non–specific Infectious Diseases 5.2. Specific Infectious Disease 5.2.1. Tuberculosis 5.2.2. Leprosy 5.2.3. TreponematosisUNESCO – EOLSS 6. Trauma analysis 6.1. Accidental SAMPLETrauma CHAPTERS 6.2. Intentional Trauma 7. Osteological and dental evidence of degenerative disease and habitual activities 7.1. Osteoarthritis 7.2. Schmorl’s Nodes 7.3. Tooth Wear Caused by Habitual Activities 8. Conclusion Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch ©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) PHYSICAL (BIOLOGICAL) ANTHROPOLOGY - Bioarchaeology (Anthropological Archaeology) - Mario ŠLAUS 1. Introduction 1.1. Definition of Bioarchaeology Bioarchaeology is the study of human biological remains within their cultural (archaeological) context.
    [Show full text]
  • Skye: a Landscape Fashioned by Geology
    SCOTTISH NATURAL SKYE HERITAGE A LANDSCAPE FASHIONED BY GEOLOGY SKYE A LANDSCAPE FASHIONED BY GEOLOGY SCOTTISH NATURAL HERITAGE Scottish Natural Heritage 2006 ISBN 1 85397 026 3 A CIP record is held at the British Library Acknowledgements Authors: David Stephenson, Jon Merritt, BGS Series editor: Alan McKirdy, SNH. Photography BGS 7, 8 bottom, 10 top left, 10 bottom right, 15 right, 17 top right,19 bottom right, C.H. Emeleus 12 bottom, L. Gill/SNH 4, 6 bottom, 11 bottom, 12 top left, 18, J.G. Hudson 9 top left, 9 top right, back cover P&A Macdonald 12 top right, A.A. McMillan 14 middle, 15 left, 19 bottom left, J.W.Merritt 6 top, 11 top, 16, 17 top left, 17 bottom, 17 middle, 19 top, S. Robertson 8 top, I. Sarjeant 9 bottom, D.Stephenson front cover, 5, 14 top, 14 bottom. Photographs by Photographic Unit, BGS Edinburgh may be purchased from Murchison House. Diagrams and other information on glacial and post-glacial features are reproduced from published work by C.K. Ballantyne (p18), D.I. Benn (p16), J.J. Lowe and M.J.C. Walker. Further copies of this booklet and other publications can be obtained from: The Publications Section, Cover image: Scottish Natural Heritage, Pinnacle Ridge, Sgurr Nan Gillean, Cullin; gabbro carved by glaciers. Battleby, Redgorton, Perth PH1 3EW Back page image: Tel: 01783 444177 Fax: 01783 827411 Cannonball concretions in Mid Jurassic age sandstone, Valtos. SKYE A Landscape Fashioned by Geology by David Stephenson and Jon Merritt Trotternish from the south; trap landscape due to lavas dipping gently to the west Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall Quarter 2018 Class Schedule
    FALL QUARTER 2018 CLASS SCHEDULE COURSE NUMBER COURSE TITLE SPECIAL TOPIC (IF APPLICABLE) INSTRUCTOR Core Course Archaeology M201A Graduate Core Seminar Monica Smith Archaeology C220 Archaeology of Death John Papadopoulos Anthropology 219 Selected Topics in Anthropological/Archaeological Theory Issues in Indigenous Archaeology Stephen Acabado Ancient Near East 260 Seminar: Ancient Near Eastern Archaeology Elizabeth Carter Ancient Near East 261 Practical Field Archaeology Archaeological Fieldwork (Ethiopia) Willeke Wendrich Graduate Art and Architecture of Ancient Egypt, Predynastic Period to Ancient Near East C267A Kara Cooney Seminars New Kingdom Art History C216A Middle Byzantine Art & Architecture Sharon Gerstel Art History C248A Art and Material Culture, Neolithic to 210 B.C. Art & Material Culture of Early China Lothar von Falkenhausen Art History C249A Selected Topics in Chinese Art Lothar von Falkenhausen Classics 245 Computing and Classics Chris Johanson Classics 250 Topics in Greek and Roman Culture and Literature Women's History Amy Richlin Archaeology M205A Selected Laboratory Topics in Archaeology Experimental Archaeology Tom Wake Conservation M210L Cultural Materials Science Laboratory: Technical Study Ioanna Kakoulli Conservation 231 Conservation Laboratory: Stone and Adobe Christian Fischer Conservation 238 Conservation Laboratory: Organic Materials II Ellen Pearlstein Lab Courses Conservation Laboratory: Rock Art, Wall Paintings, and Conservation M250 Ioanna Kakoulli Mosaics Structure, Properties, and Deterioration of
    [Show full text]
  • Silbury Hill – А Case Study with LANDSCAPE ARCHAEOLOGY: SILBURY HILL – a CASE STUDY LIONEL LIONEL SIMS LIONEL SIMS
    VI. LANDSCAPE ARCHAEOLOGY AND ARCHAEOASTRONOMY INTEGRATING ARCHAEOASTRONOMY Integrating Archaeology: with Landscape ArchaeoastronomySilbury Hill – а Case Study WITH LANDSCAPE ARCHAEOLOGY: SILBURY HILL – A CASE STUDY LIONEL LIONEL SIMS LIONEL SIMS Abstract Weaknesses in both archaeoastronomy and landscape archaeology can be overcome by their combination. This is demonstrat- ed through a new interpretation of Silbury Hill in Avebury, Wiltshire. If monuments in their local landscape are considered as one choice in a system of alternatives, tests can be devised to intepret the prehistoric builders‘ intentions. This exercise finds that the builders chose a prescriptive arrangement of views of Silbury Hill to simulate a facsimile of the moon entering and returning from the underworld. Key words: dark moon, crescent moon, paired alignments, Silbury Hill, West Kennet Avenue, Beckhampton Avenue, Ave- bury, underworld. Introduction with a level circular summit platform.To date, no con- vincing explanation as to its meaning has been offered. Archaeoastronomy has to move on from the legacy of Archaeologists have long expected that excavating the the Thom paradigm if it is to prove its relevance to sci- interior of the hill would reveal burials or deposited ar- ence (Sims 2006). Over the last three decades the dis- tefacts that would provide the clues to its decoding. In cipline has established robust field methods procedures spite of the many tunnels that have been dug, so much and, in so doing, falsified Thom‘s claim for a prehis- so that the Hill has now to be rescued from imminent toric precision astronomy (Thom 1971; Ruggles 1999; collapse, no burials have been found nor interpretive Hoskin 2001, Belmonte 2006; Schaefer 1993; North breakthroughs made.
    [Show full text]
  • The Archaeology of Maritime Adaptations
    Anthropology 6146 Sec 211G/ CBD 234 Dr. Susan D. deFrance Spring 2016 1350-B Turlington Hall/1112 Turlington [email protected] Office hours Tues & Thursday 2-3:30 pm and by appt. The Archaeology of Maritime Adaptations Course Objectives and Goals: This seminar examines issues pertaining to human maritime adaptations in archaeological, ethnohistoric and ethnographic contexts. Issues to be examined include: 1) Definitions of Maritime Adaptations 2) History of Investigations 3) Characteristics of Marine Resources 4) Technology and Organization of Maritime Predation 5) Limitations on Maritime Subsistence 6) Ownership, Territory, and Resource Rights 7) Population, Settlement and Site Size 8) Economic and Political Organization 9) Complexity of Maritime Societies Populations and cultures exhibiting maritime adaptations, among others, include: Jomon, Pacific Islands, Yagan, Andean Coast, Chumash, Northwest Coast, Eskimo/Aleut, Red Paint Archaic, Calusa, European Mesolithic, Coastal Maya Readings are available on the course elearning/Sakai site. Written Work and Class Presentations: 1) Weekly Assignments: 1-2 page review (critique, evaluation – not summaries) of ALL weekly readings. These are due at the start of class; late papers are not accepted without prior permission. 2) Each session students will be assigned one reading to present in detail (max. 15 minutes). Oral presentations will rotate between students depending on the number of reading assignments per week. All students must be prepared to discuss all the weekly readings at class time. 3) Final Paper (due APRIL 25 AT 4 PM- NO late papers, No incompletes, emergencies excluded) – on an approved topic related to the Archaeology of Maritime Adaptations. Final Paper should follow American Antiquity format for bibliography with a minimum of 2 references per page.
    [Show full text]
  • ARCHY 469 – Theory in Archaeology
    ARCHY 469 – Theory in Archaeology Lecture: TTh 1:30 – 3:20pm, SMI 307 Instructor: Debora C. Trein Instructor’s office: DEN 133 Office Hours: F 11:30 – 1:30pm, or by appointment Email: [email protected] Source: unknown artist Course Description: How do we go from artifacts to statements about the lives of people in the past? How much of the past can we truly know, when most of the pertinent evidence has long since degraded, and when the people we aim to study are long dead? This course provides a broad survey of the major theoretical trends that have shaped anthropological archaeology over time. We will outline and examine some of the major publications, debates, and shifts in archaeological thought that have influenced the diverse ways in which we claim to know what we know about the past. In this course, we will explore the notion that the various intellectual approaches we employ to make statements about the past are influenced by the different perspectives we have of the relationship between the past and the present, the kinds of meaning we believe can be derived from the archaeological record, the questions we seek to answer, and the methods we use to retrieve (and prioritize) information. This course will start with a broad overview of the major periods of theoretical development in archaeology from the 1800s to the present, followed by discussions of how archaeologists tackle common archaeological questions through diverse theoretical lenses (and why sometimes they don’t tackle these questions at all). While the politics of archaeological practice will be 1 | Page touched upon throughout the course, we will devote the last quarter of the course to the repercussions of archaeological practice to present-day communities and stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Archaeology - M
    ARCHAEOLOGY – Vol. I - Landscape Archaeology - M. Gojda LANDSCAPE ARCHAEOLOGY M. Gojda Institute of Archaeology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Czech Republic Keywords: landscape, space, site, monument, archaeology, geography, survey, mapping, fieldwalking, non-destructivity. Contents 1. The Concept of Landscape: Past and Present 1.1 Perceptions of the Landscape and their Reflection in the Arts 1.2 Contemporary Views of the Landscape in Philosophy and the Natural Sciences 1.3 The Landscape Phenomenon in Contemporary Archaeology and Anthropology 2. Sites and Monuments in the Context of Landscape 2.1 The Birth of Interest: Founding Fathers 2.2 New Impulses: Crawford and his Discoveries 2.3 From the Archaeology of Settlements to the Archaeology of Landscapes 3. The Main Fields Concerned with Understanding Landscape Archetypes 3.1 Landscape and Spatial Archaeology 3.2 Historical and Settlement Geography, Cartography, GIS 4. Non-Destructiveness and Future Developments in Landscape Archaeology Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary The gradually increasing awareness of the deep mutual relationships between the natural and social environments determines the ever more pronounced contemporary orientation of archaeology towards the protection and study of cultural landscapes and their historical development. The landscape is a phenomenon claimed by the advocates of both positivist (scientific) and postmodern approaches to archaeology. Each has found within it inspiration for the expansion of its paradigms. A summary is presented of the understanding to date of the landscape phenomenon and the expression of man’s relation to it in the arts, philosophy, natural sciences, and particularly in archaeology and anthropology.UNESCO The roots of the –burge EOLSSoning interest in the discovery and documentation of monuments in the landscape, and of the tracing of their relationships both to natural landscapeSAMPLE components and to eaCHAPTERSch other, are examined.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2016
    2016 Annual Report Board of Trustees Contents Message from the director 7 MANAGEMENT 9 About us: Big general data for 2016 11 Staff 14 Scientific Advisory Board 19 RESEARCH 21 Research Groups 23 Research Projects Hosted by IPHES 29 Research Projects not Hosted by IPHES 33 Research Fellowships 37 Publications 40 Activity as Referee 54 Fieldwork activity 58 Congresses, workshops & seminars 63 Short-term stay at other research centers 79 ACADEMY 83 Degrees and Doctoral Programme 85 PhD Thesis supervised and defended 87 Master Thesis supervised and defended 89 Participation in assessment Committees to evaluate PhD 93 OUTREACH 95 Conferences and talks 97 Outreach publications 104 Science education 105 Management of exhibitions 107 Participatory activities 109 Didactic contents and materials 109 Science Communication 110 KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER & SERVICES 117 2016 Message from the director Robert Sala, IPHES director/IPHES theless they still need an increase in st It is for me a pleasure to introduce the number of papers within the 1 the 2016 Annual Report of Activ- quartile. After accomplishing with ities of the Catalan Institute of Hu- good absolute figures is time for our man Palaeoecology and Social institute to gain the relative score in Evolution. IPHES is a mature institute excellence and increase our cur- st hosting very active research teams rent 31.8% of 1 quartile papers. devoted to the creation and social- isation of knowledge on the human The visibility of the research of an in- evolutionary process in all its dimen- stitute can be also measured by its sions and framework. The scientific presence in the main international activity of our institute is currently congresses.
    [Show full text]
  • MAX D. PRICE EDUCATION Ph.D. 2016 Harvard University
    MAX D. PRICE Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Materials Science and Engineering 77 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02139 Email: [email protected] EDUCATION Ph.D. 2016 Harvard University Department of Anthropology, Dissertation Title: Pigs and Power: Pig Husbandry in Northern Mesopotamia during the Emergence of Social Complexity (6500-2000 BC) B.A. 2009 The University of Chicago Department of Anthropology (with honors) ACADEMIC POSITIONS 2017-Present Lecturer in Archaeology, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, MIT 2017 Postdoctoral Researcher (Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter), Graduate School “Human Development in Landscapes,” Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel 2016-2017 Postdoctoral Fellow, Peabody Museum & Department of Anthropology, Harvard University RESEARCH INTERESTS Animal Domestication; Human-Environment Interaction; Foodways; Social Inequality; Near Eastern Archaeology; Stable Isotope Ecology; Zooarchaeology BOOKS In Press Evolution of a Taboo: Pigs and People in the Ancient Near East. Oxford University Press (expected date of publication: March 2020). PEER-REVIEWED PUBLICATIONS In Review Price, M. D., Y. M. Rowan, M. Kersel, and C. Makarewicz. "Cattle in the Ghor and Grain-Eating Boar: Isotopic Perspectives on Animal Husbandry at Chalcolithic Marj Rabba" Submitted to Anthropological and Archaeological Sciences August 2019. In Press Price, M. D. “Pigs in Between: Pig Husbandry in the Late Neolithic in Northern Mesopotamia.” Archaeozoology of the Near East XII. Lockwood Press. In Press Price, M. D. and H. Hongo. “The Archaeology of Pig Domestication: Methods, Models, and Case Studies.” Journal of Archaeological Research. Accepted March 2019. 2019 Frantz, L. A. F., J. Haile, A. T. Lin, A. Scheu, C. Geörg, N. Benecke, M. Alexander, A. Linderholm, V. E. Mullin, K.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Zooarchaeology in the Interpretation of Socioeconomic Status: a Discussion with Reference to Medieval Europe
    This is a repository copy of The role of zooarchaeology in the interpretation of socioeconomic status: a discussion with reference to Medieval Europe. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/11094/ Article: Ashby, S.P. orcid.org/0000-0003-1420-2108 (2002) The role of zooarchaeology in the interpretation of socioeconomic status: a discussion with reference to Medieval Europe. Archaeological Review from Cambridge. pp. 37-59. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ The Role of Zooarchaeology in the Interpretation of Socioeconomic Status: A Discussion with Reference to Medieval Europe Steven P. Ashby Department of Archaeology, University of York Introduction Social inequality is ubiquitous in human society, and the concept of social standing has been of fundamental importance throughout time (Price and Feinman 1995). The inference of social status has encountered problems in many areas of archaeology (see Orser 1990; Grenville 1997), and the use of zooarchaeology as part of an integrated approach may contribute to our understanding of important issues (Crabtree 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • Phd-Thesis Hildurmagnúsdóttir.Pdf
    Phenotypic and genotypic variation in the subtidal gastropod Buccinum undatum Hildur Magnúsdóttir Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Iceland 2020 Phenotypic and genotypic variation in the subtidal gastropod Buccinum undatum Hildur Magnúsdóttir Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of a Philosophiae Doctor degree in Biology Supervisor Snæbjörn Pálsson Advisors Erla Björk Örnólfsdóttir Snæbjörn Pálsson Zophonías Oddur Jónsson PhD Committee Erla Björk Örnólfsdóttir Kristen Marie Westfall Snæbjörn Pálsson Zophonías Oddur Jónsson Opponents Rémy Rochette Karl Gunnarsson Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences School of Engineering and Natural Sciences University of Iceland Reykjavik, Oct 2020 Phenotypic and genotypic variation in the subtidal gastropod Buccinum undatum Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of a Philosophiae Doctor degree in Biology Copyright © 2020 Hildur Magnúsdóttir All rights reserved Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences School of Engineering and Natural Sciences University of Iceland Sturlugötu 7 102, Reykjavik Iceland Telephone: 525 4000 Bibliographic information: Hildur Magnúsdóttir, 2020, Phenotypic and genotypic variation in the subtidal gastropod Buccinum undatum, PhD dissertation, Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Iceland, XX pp. Author ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3750-4937 Printing: Háskólaprent, Fálkagata 2, 101 Reykjavík, Iceland Reykjavik, Iceland, October 2020 Abstract Variation in morphology of shelled marine gastropods across small spatial scales may reflect restricted population connectivity, resulting in evolutionary or plastic responses to environmental heterogeneity. Species delimitation of shelled gastropods is often based solely on shell characteristics; therefore, morphological variation can lead to taxonomic confusion and inaccurate estimates of species diversity. A comprehensive delimitation approach based on both phenotypic and genotypic information is needed in the face of such taxonomic uncertainty.
    [Show full text]