Permaculture for Agroecology: Design, Practice, Movement, and Worldview

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Permaculture for Agroecology: Design, Practice, Movement, and Worldview Permaculture for Agroecology: Design, Practice, Movement, and Worldview. A Review. This is a preprint (17 September 2013) of an article accepted for publication in Agronomy for Sustainable Development http://link.springer.com/journal/13593 The final published version may differ from this preprint. Review Article. Permaculture for Agroecology: Design, Practice, Movement, and Worldview. A Review. Rafter Sass FERGUSON1, Sarah Taylor LOVELL2 1,2 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. 1009 Plant Sciences Laboratory 1201 S. Dorner Drive Urbana, IL 61801 (Accepted 11 Sepember 2013) Abstract - Agroecology is a promising alternative to industrial agriculture, with the potential to avoid the negative social and ecological consequences of input-intensive production. Transitioning to agroecological production is, however, a complex project that requires diverse contributions from outside of scientific institutions. Agroecologists therefore collaborate with tradtional producers and agroecological movements. Permaculture is one such agroecological movement, with a broad international distribution and a unique approach to system design. Despite a high public profile, permaculture has remained relatively isolated from scientific research. Though the potential contribution of permaculture to agroecological transition is great, it is limited by this isolation from science, as well as from oversimplifying claims, and the lack of a clear definition. Here we review scientific and popular permaculture literature. A systematic review discusses quantitative bibliometric data, including keyword analysis. A qualitative review identifies and asseses major themes, proposals and claims. The manuscript follows a stratified definition of permaculture as design system, best practice framework, worldview, and movement. The major points of our analysis are: 1) principles and topics largely complement and even extend principles and topics found in the agroecological literature. 2) Distinctive approaches to perennial polyculture, water management, and the importance of agroecosystem configuration, exceed what is documented in the scientific literature, and thus suggest promising avenues of inquiry. 3) Discussions of practice consistently underplay the complexity, challenges, and risks that producers face in developing diversified and integrated production systems. 4) The movement is mobilizing diverse forms of social support for sustainabililty, in geographically diverse locations. 5) Scholarship in permaculture has always been a diverse marginal sector, but is growing. permaculture / farm design / perennial polyculture / agroecological transition / diversified farming systems / agroecological movement Rafter Sass Ferguson & Sarah Taylor Lovell. Agronomy for Sustainable Development (in press). Permaculture for Agroecology: Design, Practice, Movement, and Worldview. A Review. CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 3 2 BACKGROUND 4 2.1 Shifting Definitions 4 2.2 Historical Context 4 2.3 Conceptual Influences 5 2.3.1 Permanent as Sustainable and 5 Perennial 5 2.3.2 Systems Ecology 5 2.3.4 Keyline Planning 6 2.4 Permaculture and Agroecology 6 3 REVIEW METHODS 7 3.1 Systematic Review 7 3.1.1 Search Protocol 8 3.1.2 Bibliometric Analysis 8 3.1.3 Concept Network 9 3.2 Qualitative Review 10 4 RESULTS 10 4.1 Systematic and Bibliometric 10 Review 10 4.1.1 Publication Type 10 4.1.2 Geography of Publication and Topic 10 4.1.3 Concept Network 13 4.2 Qualitative Review 13 4.2.1 Design 14 4.2.2 Practice 20 4.2.3 Movement 22 4.2.4 Worldview 23 5 SYNTHESIS 24 5.1 Substantiation and Scholarship 24 5.1.1 Overreaching Claims 24 5.1.2 Isolation from Science 26 5.1.3 Permaculture Scholarship 27 5.2 Limitations of this Study 27 5.3 Future Directions 28 6 CONCLUSION 29 REFERENCES 30 Rafter Sass Ferguson & Sarah Taylor Lovell. Agronomy for Sustainable Development (in press). Permaculture for Agroecology: Design, Practice, Movement, and Worldview. A Review. 1. INTRODUCTION This paper addresses the alternative agroecology Increasing concerns about the negative impacts of movement called permaculture and its potential industrial agriculture have generated a vigorous contributions to agroecological transition. debate over the feasibility of transition to alternative Permaculture is an international movement and forms of agriculture, capable of providing a broad ecological design system (Fig. 1). Despite suite of ecosystem services while producing yields for permaculture's international extent and relatively high human use. The transition to diversified, ecologically public profile, it has received very little discussion in benign, smaller-scale production systems is addressed the scientific literature. The term originated as a in the literature of agroecology (De Schutter 2010), portmanteau of permanent agriculture, and is defined diversified farming systems (Kremen et al. 2012), and by co-originator David Holmgren as “Consciously multifunctional agriculture (Wilson 2008). designed landscapes which mimic the patterns and Agroecological transition must be regarded as a relationships found in nature, while yielding an complex, multi-sector project, operating at multiple abundance of food, fibre and energy for provision of temporal and spatial scales and involving diverse local needs” (2004, p. xix). As a broadly distributed constituencies (Geels and Kemp 2007; Marques 2010; movement with a distinctive conceptual framework Piraux et al. 2010). For this reason, researchers have for agroecosystem design, permaculture's relevance to often directed their attention outside of institutional the project of agroecological transition has several science, to document the contributions that traditional aspects. Permaculture can function as a framework and innovative practices offer to the process of for integrating knowledge and practice across transition (Altieri 2004; Ingram 2007; Rocha 2005; disciplines to support collaboration with mixed Koohafkan et al. 2012; Rosset et al. 2011). Alternative groups of researchers, stakeholders, and land users. agroecology movements, for example, have been Permaculture contributes to an applied form of critical in the process of regional agroecological ecological literacy (Orr 1992), supplying a popular transition (Nelson et al. 2009; Altieri and Toledo and accessible synthesis of complex socio-ecological 2011), and likely will be in the future (Fernandez et concepts. The design orientation of permaculture al. 2012; Petersen et al. 2012). offers a distinctive perspective that suggests avenues of inquiry in agroecosystem research. Lastly, these (a) (b) Figure 1. Examples of production and education in the permaculture movement. (a) Small farm with intercropped annuals and perennials, worked partially with hand labor, (b) Workshop on the design and maintenance of perennial polycultures. Rafter Sass Ferguson & Sarah Taylor Lovell. Agronomy for Sustainable Development (in press). Permaculture for Agroecology: Design, Practice, Movement, and Worldview. A Review. factors are embodied in an international movement that operates largely outside of the influence and 2 BACKGROUND support of large institutions, which suggests 2.1 Shifting Definitions opportunities for participatory-action research and the The definition of permaculture varies among mobilization of popular inquiry and support (Méndez sources, and displays an expansion in subject area et al. 2013). over time. In 1978, permaculture was defined in the The potential of permaculture to contribute founding text as "an integrated, evolving system of broadly to agroecological transition is limited by perennial or self-perpetuating plant and animal several factors. Of primary importance is the general species useful to man ... in essence, a complete isolation of permaculture from science, both in terms agricultural ecosystem, modeled on existing but of a lack of scholarly research about permaculture, simpler examples." (Mollison & Holmgren, p. 1). By and neglect within the permaculture literature of the 1988 the definition had grown in scope to contemporary scientific perspectives. This deficit is encompass broader issues of human settlement, while compounded by overreaching and oversimplifying maintaining a core agricultural focus: "Permaculture claims made by movement adherents, and the absence … is the conscious design and maintenance of of any systematic multi-site assessment of agriculturally productive ecosystems which have the permaculture's impacts. Additionally, the difficulty of diversity, stability, and resilience of natural providing a clear and distinguishing description of ecosystems. It is the harmonious integration of permaculture can cause confusion and hinder rigorous landscape and people providing their food, energy, and systematic discussion. shelter, and other material and non-material needs in a sustainable way” (Mollison). While permaculture The objective of this paper is to contribute to a addresses multiple aspects of human settlement, this better understanding of the substance, strengths, and paper will focus primarily on those aspects of limitations of permaculture as a potential contributor permaculture relevant to agriculture and to agroecological transition. Introductory material agroecological transition. includes a brief overview of the origins and development of permaculture, the growth of the 2.2 Historical Context movement over time, and a preliminary heuristic for Permaculture emerged in parallel with other comparing the prominence and overlap of movements and disciplines with a focus
Recommended publications
  • Curriculum Vitae
    CURRICULUM VITAE BRIAN C. CAMPBELL Present Position: Associate Professor, Berry College, Director, Environmental Studies Program Evans Hall 212, Mount Berry, GA, 30149-0081 Email: [email protected] Phone Number W: (706) 368-6996 Citizenship: United States of America Languages: English and Spanish Research Program: Agricultural Biodiversity Conservation and Food Sovereignty in Floyd County, GA, and Visual Environmental Anthropology in the US Southern Highlands (Ozarks, Appalachia) and Belize, Central America RESEARCH APPROACHES, INTERESTS, REGIONS Agroecology, Applied, Community-Based, Ethnoecology, Political Ecology, Visual Anthropology Agrarianism, Agrobiodiversity, Environmentalism, Food Sovereignty, Justice, Methods, Sustainability Andes, Appalachia, Central America, Ozark Highlands EDUCATION 2005 Ph.D., Cultural Anthropology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA Concentrations: Agricultural Anthropology, Environmentalism, Ethnoecology 2002 Conservation Ecology and Sustainable Development, Graduate Certification University of Georgia Institute of Ecology 1994-1998 B.A., Summa Cum Laude, Truman State University, Kirksville, MO Majors: English, Anthropology Minors: Spanish, International Studies 1996 Attended Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica, Heredia, C.R., Central America PROFESSIONAL AND ACADEMIC EXPERIENCE 2018 Development of “Food, Ecology and Culture in Greece” Study Abroad course and 6-week summer and semester courses at the American Farm School / Perrotis College, Thessaloniki, Greece 2016 Tenured at Berry College, Mount Berry,
    [Show full text]
  • Challenge of Landscape
    The Challenge of Landscape THE DEVELOPMENT AND PRACTICE OF KEYLINE * * * by P. A. YEOMANS PUBLISHED BY KEYLINE PUBLISHING PTY. LIMITED 117 PITT STREET SYDNEY AUSTRALIA Downloaded from a public source, reformatted and corrected in 2014 to a document by Geoffrey Booth for Keyline Archive. www.youtube.com/channel/UCUPgPJZAlkxt207sxcdp4DQ/about THIS BOOK IS WHOLLY SET UP AND PRINTED IN AUSTRALIA BY WAITE & BULL PTY. LIMITED, 486 ELIZABETH ST., SYDNEY. REGISTERED AT THE GENERAL POST OFFICE, SYDNEY, FOR TRANSMISSION THROUGH THE POST AS A BOOK. 1958 COPYRIGHT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. THIS BOOK IS PRESENTED AT SOIL AND HEALTH LIBRARY WITH THE SPECIFIC AND DIRECT PERMISSION OF ALLAN YEOMANS DEDICATION THIS BOOK is dedicated to the Trustees of the Keyline (Research) Foundation in appreciation of their willing co-operation and valuable support in the cause of Keyline. The Trustees of the Foundation are: SIR C. STANTON HICKS (Vice-President) D. R. MCCAUGHEY (Vice-President) C. R. McKERIHAN (Treasurer) PROFESSOR J. R. A. MCMILLAN DR. G. B. S. FALKINER JOHN DARLING MY WIFE AND MYSELF On the formation of the Foundation I was appointed President, and Harold N. Sarina accepted the position of Honorary Secretary. The real beginning of the work which led to Keyline was in 1944, our first full year on "Yobarnie", when my brother-in-law manager lost his life in the bush fire. So for my wife the early association with the whole project was one of deep bereavement, and but for her willingness to continue then, Keyline would not have originated. * * * SIR C. STANTON HICKS is Professor of Human Physiology and Pharmacology at the University of Adelaide; is widely known in England, the United States of America, as well as in Australasia for his interests in land development.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resource Management Among Small-Scale Farmers in Semi-Arid Lands: Building on Traditional Knowledge and Agroecology
    Annals of Arid Zone 44(3&4): 365-385, 2005 Natural Resource Management among Small-scale Farmers in Semi-arid Lands: Building on Traditional Knowledge and Agroecology Miguel A. Altieri1 and Vìctor M. Toledo2 1 Department of Environmental Science Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, USA 2 Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas, Universidad Nacional Autònoma de Mèxico Abstract: Although risk and uncertainty dominate the lives of most rural inhabitants of the semi-arid regions of the world, many farmers have been able to develop durable farming systems through the use of innovative soil and water management systems and the use of locally adapted crop species and varieties. In this paper we provide examples of farming systems developed by traditional farmers well adapted to the local conditions of the semi-arid environment, enabling farmers to generate sustained yields meeting their subsistence needs, despite harsh conditions and low use of external inputs. Part of this performance is linked to the ingenious soil and water conservation systems but also to the high levels of agrobiodiversity exhibited by traditional agroecosystems, which in turn positively influences agroecosystem function. We also give examples of projects aimed at assisting rainfed resource-poor farmers in the development of a variety of practical techniques and strategies to enhance production and resiliency in the midst of resource constraints typical of semi-arid environments. Many of these efforts use elements of modern science but that build upon
    [Show full text]
  • Designing Agroecological Transitions; a Review Michel Duru, Olivier Therond, Mehand Fares
    Designing agroecological transitions; A review Michel Duru, Olivier Therond, Mehand Fares To cite this version: Michel Duru, Olivier Therond, Mehand Fares. Designing agroecological transitions; A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, Springer Verlag/EDP Sciences/INRA, 2015, 35 (4), pp.0. 10.1007/s13593-015-0318-x. hal-01340332 HAL Id: hal-01340332 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01340332 Submitted on 30 Jun 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License Agron. Sustain. Dev. (2015) 35:1237–1257 DOI 10.1007/s13593-015-0318-x REVIEW ARTICLE Designing agroecological transitions; A review Michel Duru1,2 & Olivier Therond1,2 & M’hand Fares1,2 Accepted: 28 May 2015 /Published online: 1 July 2015 # INRA and Springer-Verlag France 2015. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Concerns about the negative impacts of agriculture, (2) the pathway of the transition and (3) the re- productivist agriculture have led to the emergence of two quired adaptive governance structures and management strat- forms of ecological modernisation of agriculture. The first, egies. We conclude by analysing key challenges of designing efficiency-substitution agriculture, aims to improve input use such a complex transition, developing multi-actor and multi- efficiency and to minimise environmental impacts of modern domain approaches based on a combination of scientific and farming systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Scaling up Agroecology to Achieve the Sustainable Development Goals
    SCALING UP AGROECOLOGY TO ACHIEVE THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS 2ND FAO INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON AGROECOLOGY By Kim Assaël From 3 to 5 April 2018 FAO has hosted the 2nd International Symposium on Agroecology: Scaling-up Agroecology to achieve the (SDGs). Building on the first Symposium and the subsequent regional workshops, the Symposium on Agroecology focused the transition of Agroecology from dialogue to action, by sharing ideas and experiences, while discussing policies and actions that can support agroecology in achieving the SDGs and accompany the decade of Family Farming (2019-2028) and the Decade of Action on Nutrition (2016-2025). About 400 participants were attended, from policy- makers and governments, agroecology practitioners and civil society representatives, to members from academia and research, the private sector and representatives from the regional meetings. Even with it almost 700 were the effective participants and plenary rooms have been changed at the last minute to make space to all participants. Key elements and actions to support scaling up agroecology have been intensively discussed as the multiple benefits of agroecology are an important path for meeting the 2030 Agenda objectives and addressing the interlinked challenges. The key facts underpinning the big advantages of agroecology are summarized in the FAO website: Agroecology relies on ecosystem services to improve productivity. The knowledge and practices of farmers and food producers from all over the world are at the core of agroecology. Agroecology can address the root causes of hunger, poverty and inequality. Agroecology combines farmers’ knowledge with modern science in innovative ways. Agroecology provides local solutions for global challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • Agroecology What It Is and What It Has to Offer
    Agroecology What it is and what it has to offer Laura Silici Issue Paper Food and agriculture Keywords: June 2014 Agroecology, Small-scale farming, Food sovereignty, Agro-biodiversity About the authors Laura Silici, Researcher, IIED Natural Resources Group, Agroecology team [email protected] Acknowledgements The author is extremely grateful to Barbara Adolph, Krystyna Swiderska and Seth Cook (IIED) for their significant contributions to the draft; to Patrick Mulvany (UK Food Group) and Bruce Ferguson (El Colegio de la Frontera Sur) for reviewing the paper; and to Fiona Hinchcliffe for her valuable editorial advice. Produced by IIED’s Natural Resources Group The aim of the Natural Resources Group is to build partnerships, capacity and wise decision-making for fair and sustainable use of natural resources. Our priority in pursuing this purpose is on local control and management of natural resources and other ecosystems. Published by IIED, June 2014 Laura Silici, 2014. Agroecology: What it is and what it has to offer. IIED Issue Paper. IIED, London. Product code: 14629IIED ISBN: 978-1-78431-065-3 Printed on recycled paper with vegetable-based inks. Photo credit: CIMMYT using Creative Commons International Institute for Environment and Development 80-86 Gray’s Inn Road, London WC1X 8NH, UK Tel: +44 (0)20 3463 7399 Fax: +44 (0)20 3514 9055 email: [email protected] www.iied.org @iied www.facebook.com/theIIED Download more publications at www.iied.org/pubs ISSUE PAPER In a context of a changing climate and growing concerns for more healthy food systems, agroecology is gaining momentum as a scientific discipline, sustainable farming approach and social movement.
    [Show full text]
  • PROMOTING AGROECOLOGY the Most Effective Way to Achieve Sustainable Food Security and Nutrition for All in a Changing Climate
    © Tine Frank - Soudan du Sud Frank Tine © PROMOTING AGROECOLOGY The most effective way to achieve sustainable food security and nutrition for all in a changing climate In 2017, at least 795 million people are facing chronic food This food system doesn’t address the joint challenges of food insecurity and half of the world’s population suffers from and nutrition security and climate change. Instead of this, it has malnutrition, while the total agriculture output produces enough a great responsibility in environmental degradation, collapse calories to feed 12 billion1. of biodiversity, pressure on natural resources, greenhouse gas emissions. It also has tremendous social impacts such as the loss Small scale farmers produce 80% of our food2 but remain the of traditional and locally adapted know-hows; concentration of most affected by food and nutrition insecurity and are the least wealth, exclusion of the most vulnerable, non-communicable supported by their governments. diseases and malnutrition in its different forms3. Climate change adds a new set of threats to food security: increased Agroecology proposes a comprehensive answer to these frequency of natural disasters, changes in local climate conditions, challenges and contributes to the realization of the Right to Food increased intensity of cyclical meteorological events, accelerated by offering a new basis for sustainable food systems, resilient desertification, floods, submersion, heat and cold waves, new pests agricultural livelihoods and good nutrition. and diseases. These phenomena will reduce crop productivity and nutrient density of crops. In this context, small scale farmers, infant children and women in particular, and the poorest, are the Therefore, Action Against Hunger stands for the promotion most vulnerable.
    [Show full text]
  • Agroecology and the Search for a Truly Sustainable Agriculture 1St Edition
    Agroecology and the Search for a Truly Sustainable Agriculture 1st edition Miguel A. Altieri Clara I. Nicholls University of California, Berkeley 9 Basic Textbooks for Environmental Training First edition: 2000 (Spanish version) First edition: 2005 (English version) © United Nations Environment Programme Environmental Training Network for Latin America and the Caribbean Boulevard de los Virreyes 155, Colonia Lomas de Virreyes 11000, Mexico D.F., Mexico ISBN 968-7913-35-5 CONTENTS PREFACE 5 INTRODUCTION 9 Chapter 1 MODERN AGRICULTURE: ECOLOGICAL IMPACTS AND THE ALTERNATIVES TO CONVENTIONAL FARMING 13 Chapter 2 AGROECOLOGY: PRINCIPLES AND STRATEGIES FOR DISIGNING SUSTAINABLE FARMING SYSTEMS 29 Chapter 3 TEN REASONS WHY BIOTECHNOLOGY WILL NOT ENSURE FOOD SECURITY, PROTECT THE ENVIRONMENT AND REDUCE POVERTY IN THE DEVELOPING WORLD 39 Chapter 4 THE ECOLOGICAL IMPACTS OF TRANSGENIC CROPS 53 Chapter 5 A DIALOGUE OF WISDOMS: LINKING ECOLOGISTS AND TRADITIONAL FARMERS IN THE SEARCH FOR A TRULY SUSTAINABLE A GRICULTURE 73 Chapter 6 AGROECOLOGY: THE SCIENCE OF NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT FOR POOR FARMERS IN MARGINAL ENVIRONMENTS 99 Chapter 7 ENHANCING THE PRODUCTIVITY OF LATIN A MERICAN T RADITIONAL PEASANT FARMING SYSTEMS THROUGH AN A GROECOLOGICAL A PPROACH 145 Chapter 8 BIOLOGICAL CONTROL IN AGROECOSYSTEMS THROUGH MANAGEMENT OF ENTOMOPHAGOUS INSECTS 179 Chapter 9 AN AGROECOLOGICAL BASIS FOR INSECT PEST MANAGEMENT 199 Chapter 10 DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING A HABITAT MANAGEMENT STRATEGY TO ENHANCE BIOLOGICAL PEST CONTROL IN AGROECOLOGY 239 Chapter 11 AGROECOLOGY: TRANSITIONING ORGANIC AGRICULTURE BEYOND INPUT SUBSTITUTION 263 Cahpter 12 A RAPID, FARMER-FRIENDLY AGROECOLOGICAL METHOD TO ESTIMATE SOIL QUALITY AND CROP HEALTH IN VINEYARD SYSTEMS 277 PrefacePreface Environmental education and training is the process whereby new knowledge and practices evolve to understand and to intervene in the solution of the complex socio-environmental problems of our time.
    [Show full text]
  • AGROECOLOGY: the Bold Future of Farming in Africa
    AGROECOLOGY The Bold Future of Farming in Africa ! Agroecology: The Bold Future of Farming in Africa • 1 “If anyone still entertained doubts as to the benefits of agroecology and as to whether it can meet the challenges of this century, this collection of essays provides a compelling answer.” Olivier De Schutter, Co-Chair of IPES-Food and Former UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food “There could not have been a more opportune time to publish Agroecology: The Bold Future of Farming in Africa.” Hans R Herren, World Food Prize (1995) and Right Livelihood (2013) Laureate. “It would be unscientific to ignore this evidence. The future of Africa’s agriculture lies in the hands and minds of Africa’s ecological farmers.” “The evidence and case studies Dr Vandana Shiva, Founder of in this report point to one Navdanya, Author of The Violence of the Green Revolution, Stolen inevitable conclusion: African Harvest, Who Really Feeds farmers hold the keys to the World. unlocking the potential of agroecological farming systems for improved nutrition, livelihoods, and biodiversity.” Jennifer Astone, Executive Director, Swift Foundation “Agroecology is the most important word no one knows: It represents a proven way of growing food that is best for people, the planet and the climate.” Anna Lappe, Small Planet Institute Cover Photo: Drought resistant pearl millet for resilience. Photo: Mwanzo Millinga Photo:2 • Agroecology: Kerry Farrelly The Bold Future of Farming in Africa AGROECOLOGY: The Bold Future of Farming in Africa With contributions from: Case studies from: Miguel Altieri TRAX, Ghana Mariann Bassey BERMA, Kenya Nnimmo Bassey Never Ending Food, Malawi Million Belay Send a Cow, Ethiopia Lim Li Ching Ruzivo Trust, Zimbabwe Steve Gliessman G BIACK, Kenya Bernard Y.
    [Show full text]
  • Permaculture/Agroecology System in Timor-Leste National School Curriculum for Basic Education
    52 Best Practices on Agroecology: Permaculture/Agroecology system in Timor-Leste Permaculture/Agroecology system in Timor-Leste National School Curriculum for Basic Education Introduction Timor-Leste is a half Island country with a total population of 1.2 million people; it is geographically situated between Asia and the Pacific region. It is a tropical country and 80 per cent of its population live in rural areas. Agriculture, fishery and forestry are the main economical mainstays. Figure 1. Students working in the garden during school garden classes (photo: Ego Lemos) In 2013, the Ministry of Education of Timor-Leste decided to reform its national curriculum for Basic Education from grade one to six. Permaculture/Agroecology school gardens had been part of the discipline of Arts and Culture. The organization behind this movement of Permaculture/Agroecology is Permatil (Permaculture Timor-Leste), which was established in 2002. This school garden program now became part of formal education of Timor-Leste. 1415 schools have been targeted to introduce school gardens across the territory of Timor-Leste. The main reason for introducing school gardens is to help teachers and students learn how to grow a variety of seasonal food crops that can contribute to the school feeding program, shifting from passive learning inside classrooms into activities outside the classroom, while providing beauty to the school landscaping. School students and communities learn how to copy the model into their home garden to improve health and nutrition of the wider family. Description of the Agroecology system The Permaculture/agroecological system is a system that increases the production of agriculture without harming nature; it is culturally appropriate and makes communities more resilient to climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Stormwater Retention System
    Integrated Stormwater Retention System A Demonstration of Innovative Stormwater Management Solutions for Rural Landowners at the Occidental Arts and Ecology Center Integrated Stormwater Retention System A Demonstration of Innovative Stormwater Management Solutions for Rural Landowners at the Occidental Arts and Ecology Center By Brock Dolman and Kate Lundquist Photographs by Brock Dolman and Jim Coleman Table of Contents Introduction 2 System Description 3 Plant List 12 Resources 14 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: We would like to thank the Dean Witter Foundation and the 11th Hour Foundation for their generous support of our work. OAEC’s WATER Institute was established to offer positive responses to the crisis of increasingly degraded water quality and diminishing water quantity. We promote a holistic and multidisciplinary understanding of healthy watersheds through our four interrelated program areas — Watershed Advocacy, Training, Education, and Research. For more information please visit www.oaecwater.org. The Occidental Arts and Ecology Center (OAEC) is a nonprofit education and organizing center and organic farm in Northern California’s Sonoma County. Since 1994, OAEC has explored, implemented, and provided education for innovative and practical approaches to the pressing environmental and economic challenges of our day. For more information please visit www.oaec.org. Copyright © 2012 Occidental Arts and Ecology Center’s WATER Institute 1 INTRODUCTION Stormwater is water flowing on land surfaces during or within 24 hours of a precipitation event that is not infiltrated into the soil. Historically it has been viewed as a problem primarily of urban areas to be solved by the outmoded engineering practice of "pave it and pipe it." This method fails to properly manage stormwater in the uplands, leading to disastrous consequences: large, powerful volumes of water moving too fast, resulting in severe erosion and flooding in low-lying areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Nature and Nurture Farm Design and Management Plan
    NATURE AND NURTURE FARM DESIGN AND MANAGEMENT PLAN Jared Aslakson Yihan Li Michael Lordon Alexandria Peters A project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degrees of Master of Science and Master of Landscape Architecture University of Michigan School of Natural Resources and Environment April 2017 Faculty Advisors: Jennifer Blesh Stanton Jones ABSTRACT This master’s project intends to explore the design process and management of restoration agriculture in Southeast Michigan. Our client, Nature and Nurture LLC. is a multi-faceted business owned and operated by Mike Levine and Erica Kempter. Between the two of them, they provide organic landscaping services, teach classes, sell organic, locally-adapted seeds, fruits, vegetables, and mushrooms to restaurants and stores throughout Southeast Michigan. The Levine and Kempter extended family has recently acquired 120 acres of property in Scio Township, near Dexter, Michigan. Much of the property has been conventionally farmed for 50 or more years, while other portions of the property are high- quality woodland and wetland. Ultimately, our clients would like to derive their income primarily from the farm. Moreover, they are committed to ecologically responsible farming and are interested in using organic practices, restoration agriculture, and agroecological techniques throughout the property. To that end, our role was to create a site plan that: does not damage the existing high-quality ecosystems on the site, is able to increase the quality of the soils in the conventionally farmed areas (metrics for quality include but are not limited to: soil organic matter, amount of organic nitrogen, phosphorous, and potassium), and is able to increase the site’s overall habitat quality.
    [Show full text]