DOCSLIB.ORG

Tickborne Diseases in Children in the United States

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tickborne Diseases in Children in the United States Tickborne Diseases in Children in the United States Jennifer S. Read, MD, MS, MPH, DTM&H*† *Department of Pediatrics, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT †Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Vermont Department of Health, Burlington, VT Practice Gaps The most common tick-borne infections in the United States are Lyme disease, ehrlichiosis, anaplasmosis, Rocky Mountain spotted fever, and babesiosis. The epidemiology of these infections in the United States is integrally related to the geographic distribution and seasonality of the tick vector of each of the infections. Because these infections can be very serious and sometimes fatal, and because of the inherent delay in obtaining laboratory confirmation (especially with serologic assays requiring acute and convalescent titers), considering early implementation of empirical treatment based on the patient’s clinical presentation is extremely important. Prevention of acquisition of tick- borne diseases requires avoiding tick-infested areas or, if this is not possible or desired, implementing steps to decrease the likelihood of tick bites and the duration of tick attachment. Objectives After completing this article, readers should be able to: 1. Understand the etiologic organisms and the associated ticks responsible for transmission, the geographic distribution of and the reported infections associated with the ticks in the United States, and the seasonality and incubation periods of tick-borne infections in the United States. 2. Recognize the clinical manifestations and laboratory abnormalities associated with the infections, especially as they relate to children. AUTHOR DISCLOSURE Dr Read has disclosed 3. Plan for the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of these infections. no financial relationships relevant to this article. This commentary does not contain a discussion of an unapproved/investigative use of a commercial product/device. INTRODUCTION ABBREVIATIONS fl CSF cerebrospinal uid Vector-borne diseases, caused by microorganisms transmitted by insects and EM erythema chronicum migrans ticks, are major causes of morbidity and mortality globally. In the United States, IFA immunofluorescent antibody fi Ig immunoglobulin vector-borne diseases are occurring more frequently and represent a signi cant RMSF Rocky Mountain spotted fever public health concern. (1) The numbers of reported vector-borne disease cases in PCR polymerase chain reaction the United States (tick-borne, mosquito-borne, and flea-borne diseases) are Vol. 40 No. 8 AUGUST 2019 381 Downloaded from http://pedsinreview.aappublications.org/ at Health Sciences Library, Stony Brook University on June 3, 2020 shown in Table 1. (1) The reported incidence of vector-borne diseases most likely significantly underestimates the actual TABLE 1. Vector-borne Disease Cases Reported occurrence of these diseases; some individuals with vector- to the National Notifiable Disease borne infections may be asymptomatic or, if symptomatic, Surveillance System—US States and may not seek medical care. Territories, 2004–2016 This review addresses the most common tick-borne DISEASE NO. CASES diseases reported in the United States, (1) specifically, Lyme disease, ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis, spotted fever rick- Tick-borne diseases ettsiosis, including Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF), Lyme disease 402,502 and babesiosis. Specifically, the following are discussed: the Anaplasmosis/ 39,959 organisms and the associated ticks responsible for trans- ehrlichiosis mission; the geographic distribution of and the reported Spotted fever 37,376 infections associated with the ticks in the United States; rickettsiosis the seasonality of tick-borne infections in the United States; Babesiosis 9,631 the infections’ incubation periods; the clinical manifes- Tularemia 2,102 tations and laboratory abnormalities associated with the infections, especially as they relate to children; and the Powassan virus 101 diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of these infections. Subtotal 491,671 Mosquito-borne diseases LYME DISEASE Dengue viruses 46,692 Zika virus 41,680 Lyme disease is the most common tick-borne infection in the United States. (2) Over a 12-year period ending in 2016, West Nile virus 31,919 402,502 cases of Lyme disease were reported in the United Malaria 20,167 States. (1) Table 2 summarizes characteristics of Borrelia Chikungunya virus 9,081 burgdorferi sensu stricto (B burgdorferi), the causative organ- California serogroup 1,063 ism of Lyme disease in the United States. The first report in viruses the United States of the skin lesion characteristic of Lyme St Louis encephalitis 133 disease, erythema chronicum migrans (EM), was published virus in 1970. (3) Subsequently, the full spectrum of clini- Eastern equine 106 cal manifestations of Lyme disease, including EM, was encephalitis virus described in 1977. (4) B burgdorferi, a spirochete in the Yellow fever virus 1 family Spirochaetaceae, (5) was first isolated in 1982. (6) Subtotal 150,842 Another Borrelia species (Borrelia miyamotoi) was first iden- fi fi Flea-borne disease 89 ti ed in Japan in the 1990s, (7) and subsequently the rst (plague) case in the United States was described. (8) Total 642,602 B burgdorferi infection is transmitted by the blacklegged tick (Ixodes scapularis) (Fig 1) and the western blacklegged Adapted from Rosenberg R, Lindsey NP, Fischer M, et al. Vital signs: trends tick (Ixodes pacificus). (2) B miyamotoi is transmitted by the in reported vectorborne disease cases—United States and Territories, 2004-2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67(17):496–501. same tick vectors as B burgdorferi. (9)(10)(11)(12) The season- ality of Lyme disease is summarized in Table 2. (5) In the United States, most cases of Lyme disease are reported from 2 regions: 1) New England through the mid-Atlantic states early disseminated, and late. (5) Early localized disease and 2) the upper Midwest states (Table 2, Fig 2). (5)(13) B (2)(5)(13) is characterized by EM at the site of the tick bite miyamotoi infections have similar seasonality and distribu- and systemic manifestations. In children, EM is the most tion as Lyme disease cases. (9)(10)(12) common manifestation of Lyme disease. Some patients with The incubation period and clinical manifestations of, and large EM lesions are misdiagnosed as having cellulitis. Only the laboratory abnormalities associated with, Lyme disease a minority of patients have the classic bull’s-eye appearance are summarized in Table 3. (2)(5)(13) The clinical manifes- (concentric rings). Several weeks after the tick bite, the next tations of Lyme disease occur in 3 stages: early localized, stage of Lyme disease (early disseminated disease) (2)(5),(13) 382 Pediatrics in Review Downloaded from http://pedsinreview.aappublications.org/ at Health Sciences Library, Stony Brook University on June 3, 2020 TABLE 2. Tick-borne Diseases in Children in the United States: Organisms, Vectors, Seasonality, and Geographic Distribution DISEASE ORGANISM VECTOR SEASONALITY GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION Lyme disease Borrelia burgdorferi sensu Blacklegged tick (Ixodes Most early localized, early >90% of cases reported from stricto (B burgdorferi) scapularis) and the western disseminated disease: April– New England (Maine, New blacklegged tick (Ixodes October Hampshire, Vermont, pacificus) Connecticut, Rhode Island, Massachusetts) and the northeastern and mid- >50% during June and July Atlantic states (Delaware, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia) Less frequently, Lyme disease is reported from the upper Midwest (especially Minnesota and Wisconsin) Some cases have been reported from northern California, Oregon, and Washington Ehrlichiosis Ehrlichia chaffeensis Lone star tick (Amblyomma Most infections: April– Predominantly southeast, americanum) September south central, east coast states Peak incidence: May–July Highest incidence in Arkansas, Delaware, Missouri, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Virginia Ehrlichia ewingii Lone star tick (A americanum) Most infections: April– Mostly southeastern, south September central, midwestern states Peak incidence: May–July Ehrlichia muris–like Possibly blacklegged tick Highest incidence: April– Minnesota, Wisconsin organism (I scapularis) September Can occur year-round in areas with endemic disease Anaplasmosis Anaplasma Blacklegged tick (I scapularis) or Most infections: June– Most frequently reported from phagocytophilum western blacklegged tick November northeastern and upper (I pacificus) midwestern states RMSF Rickettsia rickettsii American dog tick (eastern, Highest incidence: April– Throughout most of the central, western United States) September (but, in areas with continental United States Rocky Mountain wood tick in endemic disease, can occur In 2002 –2012, 5 states Rocky Mountain states year-round) accounted for 63% of cases (Arkansas, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Tennessee) Brown dog tick in southwestern Has become more common in United States and along US- parts of Arizona Mexico border Babesiosis Babesia microti and other Blacklegged tick (I scapularis) Most infections during late Northeast (especially Babesia species spring, summer, or fall Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island; also, Maine, Pennsylvania) Upper Midwest (Minnesota and Wisconsin) may manifest as multiple EM lesions. Other clinical man- stages of infection. Several months may pass between a tick ifestations may occur (with or without multiple EM lesions), bite and late Lyme disease manifestations. Children with including neurologic, cardiac,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Coxiella Burnetii
    SENTINEL LEVEL CLINICAL LABORATORY GUIDELINES FOR SUSPECTED AGENTS OF BIOTERRORISM AND EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES Coxiella burnetii American Society for Microbiology (ASM) Revised March 2016 For latest revision, see web site below: https://www.asm.org/Articles/Policy/Laboratory-Response-Network-LRN-Sentinel-Level-C ASM Subject Matter Expert: David Welch, Ph.D. Medical Microbiology Consulting Dallas, TX [email protected] ASM Sentinel Laboratory Protocol Working Group APHL Advisory Committee Vickie Baselski, Ph.D. Barbara Robinson-Dunn, Ph.D. Patricia Blevins, MPH University of Tennessee at Department of Clinical San Antonio Metro Health Memphis Pathology District Laboratory Memphis, TN Beaumont Health System [email protected] [email protected] Royal Oak, MI BRobinson- Erin Bowles David Craft, Ph.D. [email protected] Wisconsin State Laboratory of Penn State Milton S. Hershey Hygiene Medical Center Michael A. Saubolle, Ph.D. [email protected] Hershey, PA Banner Health System [email protected] Phoenix, AZ Christopher Chadwick, MS [email protected] Association of Public Health Peter H. Gilligan, Ph.D. m Laboratories University of North Carolina [email protected] Hospitals/ Susan L. Shiflett Clinical Microbiology and Michigan Department of Mary DeMartino, BS, Immunology Labs Community Health MT(ASCP)SM Chapel Hill, NC Lansing, MI State Hygienic Laboratory at the [email protected] [email protected] University of Iowa [email protected] Larry Gray, Ph.D. Alice Weissfeld, Ph.D. TriHealth Laboratories and Microbiology Specialists Inc. Harvey Holmes, PhD University of Cincinnati College Houston, TX Centers for Disease Control and of Medicine [email protected] Prevention Cincinnati, OH om [email protected] [email protected] David Welch, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Plague (Yersinia Pestis)
    Division of Disease Control What Do I Need To Know? Plague (Yersinia pestis) What is plague? Plague is an infectious disease of animals and humans caused by the bacterium Yersinia pestis. Y. pestis is found in rodents and their fleas in many areas around the world. There are three types of plague: bubonic plague, septicemic plague and pneumonic plague. Who is at risk for plague? All ages may be at risk for plague. People usually get plague from being bitten by infected rodent fleas or by handling the tissue of infected animals. What are the symptoms of plague? Bubonic plague: Sudden onset of fever, headache, chills, and weakness and one or more swollen and painful lymph nodes (called buboes) typically at the site where the bacteria entered the body. This form usually results from the bite of an infected flea. Septicemic plague: Fever, chills, extreme weakness, abdominal pain, shock, and possibly bleeding into the skin and other organs. Skin and other tissues, especially on fingers, toes, and the nose, may turn black and die. This form usually results from the bites of infected fleas or from handling an infected animal. Pneumonic plague: Fever, headache, weakness, and a rapidly developing pneumonia with shortness of breath, chest pain, cough, and sometimes bloody or watery mucous. Pneumonic plague may develop from inhaling infectious droplets or may develop from untreated bubonic or septicemic plague after the bacteria spread to the lungs. How soon do symptoms appear? Symptoms of bubonic plague usually occur two to eight days after exposure, while symptoms for pneumonic plague can occur one to six days following exposure.
    [Show full text]
  • Early History of Infectious Disease 
    © Jones and Bartlett Publishers. NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION CHAPTER ONE EARLY HISTORY OF INFECTIOUS 1 DISEASE Kenrad E. Nelson, Carolyn F. Williams Epidemics of infectious diseases have been documented throughout history. In ancient Greece and Egypt accounts describe epidemics of smallpox, leprosy, tuberculosis, meningococcal infections, and diphtheria.1 The morbidity and mortality of infectious diseases profoundly shaped politics, commerce, and culture. In epidemics, none were spared. Smallpox likely disfigured and killed Ramses V in 1157 BCE, although his mummy has a significant head wound as well.2 At times political upheavals exasperated the spread of disease. The Spartan wars caused massive dislocation of Greeks into Athens triggering the Athens epidemic of 430–427 BCE that killed up to one half of the population of ancient Athens.3 Thucydides’ vivid descriptions of this epidemic make clear its political and cultural impact, as well as the clinical details of the epidemic.4 Several modern epidemiologists have hypothesized on the causative agent. Langmuir et al.,5 favor a combined influenza and toxin-producing staphylococcus epidemic, while Morrens and Chu suggest Rift Valley Fever.6 A third researcher, Holladay believes the agent no longer exists.7 From the earliest times, man has sought to understand the natural forces and risk factors affecting the patterns of illness and death in society. These theories have evolved as our understanding of the natural world has advanced, sometimes slowly, sometimes, when there are profound break- throughs, with incredible speed. Remarkably, advances in knowledge and changes in theory have not always proceeded in synchrony. Although wrong theories or knowledge have hindered advances in understanding, there are also examples of great creativity when scientists have successfully pursued their theories beyond the knowledge of the time.
    [Show full text]
  • Veterinary Services Newsletter August 2017
    August 2017 Veterinary Services Newsletter August 2017 Wildlife Health Laboratory Veterinary Services Staff NALHN Certification: The Wildlife Health Laboratory has been working towards joining the National Animal Health Laboratory Network (NALHN) in order to have ac- cess to all CWD testing kits. The commercial test kits for CWD are now restricted, and Branch Supervisor/Wildlife only NALHN approved laboratories have access to all the kits that are currently availa- Veterinarian: Dr. Mary ble. To be considered for the program, our laboratory must meet the ISO 17025 stand- Wood ards of quality control that assure our laboratory is consistently and reliably producing Laboratory Supervisor: accurate results. In addition, our laboratory will be regularly inspected by APHIS Veter- Hank Edwards inary Services, and we will be required to complete annual competency tests. Although we have been meeting most of the ISO standards for several years, applying to the Senior Lab Scientist: NAHLN has encouraged us to tighten many of our procedures and quality control moni- Hally Killion toring. We hope to have the application submitted by the middle of August and we have our first APHIS inspection in September. Senior Lab Scientist: Jessica Jennings-Gaines Brucellosis Lab Assistant: New CWD area for elk: The Wildlife Health Laboratory confirmed the first case of Kylie Sinclair CWD in an elk from hunt area 48. This animal was captured in elk hunt area 33 as part of the elk movement study in the Bighorns to study Brucellosis. She was found dead in Wildlife Disease Specialist: hunt area 48, near the very southeastern corner of Washakie County.
    [Show full text]
  • The Plague of Thebes, a Historical Epidemic in Sophocles' Oedipus
    Oedipus Rex) is placed in the fi rst half of the decade 430– The Plague 420 BC. The play has been labeled an analytical tragedy, meaning that the crucial events which dominate the play of Thebes, a have happened in the past (2,3). Oedipus Rex, apart from the undeniable literary and Historical Epidemic historic value, also presents signifi cant medical interest because the play mentions a plague, an epidemic, which in Sophocles’ was devastating Thebes, the town of Oedipus’ hegemony. Oedipus Rex Several sections, primarily in the fi rst third of the play, refer to the aforementioned plague; the epidemic, however, Antonis A. Kousoulis, is not the primary topic of the tragedy. The epidemic, in Konstantinos P. Economopoulos, fact, is mostly a matter that serves the theatrical economy Effi e Poulakou-Rebelakou, George Androutsos, by forming a background for the evolution of the plot. and Sotirios Tsiodras Given the potential medical interest of Oedipus Rex, we decided to adopt a critical perspective by analyzing the Sophocles, one of the most noted playwrights of the literary descriptions of the plague, unraveling its clinical ancient world, wrote the tragedy Oedipus Rex in the fi rst features, defi ning the underlying cause, and discussing half of the decade 430–420 BC. A lethal plague is described in this drama. We adopted a critical approach to Oedipus possible therapeutic options. The ultimate goals of our Rex in analyzing the literary description of the disease, study were to clarify whether the plague described in unraveling its clinical features, and defi ning a possible Oedipus Rex could refl ect an actual historical event, underlying cause.
    [Show full text]
  • Tick-Borne Disease Working Group 2020 Report to Congress
    2nd Report Supported by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services • Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health Tick-Borne Disease Working Group 2020 Report to Congress Information and opinions in this report do not necessarily reflect the opinions of each member of the Working Group, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, or any other component of the Federal government. Table of Contents Executive Summary . .1 Chapter 4: Clinical Manifestations, Appendices . 114 Diagnosis, and Diagnostics . 28 Chapter 1: Background . 4 Appendix A. Tick-Borne Disease Congressional Action ................. 8 Chapter 5: Causes, Pathogenesis, Working Group .....................114 and Pathophysiology . 44 The Tick-Borne Disease Working Group . 8 Appendix B. Tick-Borne Disease Working Chapter 6: Treatment . 51 Group Subcommittees ...............117 Second Report: Focus and Structure . 8 Chapter 7: Clinician and Public Appendix C. Acronyms and Abbreviations 126 Chapter 2: Methods of the Education, Patient Access Working Group . .10 to Care . 59 Appendix D. 21st Century Cures Act ...128 Topic Development Briefs ............ 10 Chapter 8: Epidemiology and Appendix E. Working Group Charter. .131 Surveillance . 84 Subcommittees ..................... 10 Chapter 9: Federal Inventory . 93 Appendix F. Federal Inventory Survey . 136 Federal Inventory ....................11 Chapter 10: Public Input . 98 Appendix G. References .............149 Minority Responses ................. 13 Chapter 11: Looking Forward . .103 Chapter 3: Tick Biology, Conclusion . 112 Ecology, and Control . .14 Contributions U.S. Department of Health and Human Services James J. Berger, MS, MT(ASCP), SBB B. Kaye Hayes, MPA Working Group Members David Hughes Walker, MD (Co-Chair) Adalbeto Pérez de León, DVM, MS, PhD Leigh Ann Soltysiak, MS (Co-Chair) Kevin R.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Diagnostic Assays for Melioidosis, Tularemia, Plague And
    University of Nevada, Reno Development of Diagnostic Assays for Melioidosis, Tularemia, Plague and COVID19 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Cellular and Molecular Biology By Derrick Hau Dr. David P. AuCoin / Dissertation Advisor December 2020 THE GRADUATE• SCHOOL We recommend that the dissertation prepared under our supervision by entitled be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Advisor Committee Member Committee Member Committee Member Graduate School Representative David W. Zeh, Ph.D., Dean Graduate School December 2020 i Abstract Infectious diseases are caused by pathogenic organisms which can be spread throughout communities by direct and indirect contact. Burkholderia pseudomallei, Francisella tularenisis, and Yersinia pestis are the causative agents of melioidosis, tularemia and plague, respectively. These bacteria pertain to the United States of America Federal Select Agent Program as they are associated with high mortality rates, lack of medical interventions and are potential agents of bioterrorism. The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has resulted in a global pandemic due to the highly infectious nature and elevated virulence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Proper diagnosis of these infections is warranted to administer appropriate medical care and minimize further spreading. Current practices of diagnosing melioidosis, tularemia, plague and COVID-19 are inadequate due to limited resources and the untimely nature of the techniques. Commonly, diagnosing an infectious disease is by the direct detection of the causative agent. Isolation by bacterial culture is the gold standard for melioidosis, tularemia and plague infections; detection of SAR-CoV-2 nucleic acid by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the gold standard for diagnosing COVID-19.
    [Show full text]
  • Tularemia (CFSPH)
    Tularemia Importance Tularemia is a zoonotic bacterial disease with a wide host range. Infections are most prevalent among wild mammals and marsupials, with periodic epizootics in Rabbit Fever, lagomorphs and rodents, but clinical cases also occur in sheep, cats and other Deerfly Fever, domesticated species. A variety of syndromes can be seen, but fatal septicemia is Meat-Cutter’s Disease common in some species. In humans, tularemia varies from a localized infection to Ohara Disease, fulminant, life-threatening pneumonia or septicemia. Francis Disease Tularemia is mainly seen in the Northern Hemisphere, where it has recently emerged or re-emerged in some areas, including parts of Europe and the Middle East. A few endemic clinical cases have also been recognized in regions where this disease Last Updated: June 2017 was not thought to exist, such as Australia, South Korea and southern Sudan. In some cases, emergence may be due to increased awareness, surveillance and/or reporting requirements; in others, it has been associated with population explosions of animal reservoir hosts, or with social upheavals such as wars, where sanitation is difficult and infected rodents may contaminate food and water supplies. Occasionally, this disease may even be imported into a country in animals. In 2002, tularemia entered the Czech Republic in a shipment of sick pet prairie dogs from the U.S. Etiology Tularemia is caused by Francisella tularensis (formerly known as Pasteurella tularensis), a Gram negative coccobacillus in the family Francisellaceae and class γ- Proteobacteria. Depending on the author, either three or four subspecies are currently recognized. F. tularensis subsp. tularensis (also known as type A) and F.
    [Show full text]
  • Tularemia – Epidemiology
    This first edition of theWHO guidelines on tularaemia is the WHO GUIDELINES ON TULARAEMIA result of an international collaboration, initiated at a WHO meeting WHO GUIDELINES ON in Bath, UK in 2003. The target audience includes clinicians, laboratory personnel, public health workers, veterinarians, and any other person with an interest in zoonoses. Tularaemia Tularaemia is a bacterial zoonotic disease of the northern hemisphere. The bacterium (Francisella tularensis) is highly virulent for humans and a range of animals such as rodents, hares and rabbits. Humans can infect themselves by direct contact with infected animals, by arthropod bites, by ingestion of contaminated water or food, or by inhalation of infective aerosols. There is no human-to-human transmission. In addition to its natural occurrence, F. tularensis evokes great concern as a potential bioterrorism agent. F. tularensis subspecies tularensis is one of the most infectious pathogens known in human medicine. In order to avoid laboratory-associated infection, safety measures are needed and consequently, clinical laboratories do not generally accept specimens for culture. However, since clinical management of cases depends on early recognition, there is an urgent need for diagnostic services. The book provides background information on the disease, describes the current best practices for its diagnosis and treatment in humans, suggests measures to be taken in case of epidemics and provides guidance on how to handle F. tularensis in the laboratory. ISBN 978 92 4 154737 6 WHO EPIDEMIC AND PANDEMIC ALERT AND RESPONSE WHO Guidelines on Tularaemia EPIDEMIC AND PANDEMIC ALERT AND RESPONSE WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data WHO Guidelines on Tularaemia.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Babesiosis and Ehrlichiosis Current Status
    IgeneX_v1_A4_A4_2011 27/04/2012 17:26 Page 49 Tick-borne Infectious Disease Human Babesiosis and Ehrlichiosis – Current Status Jyotsna S Shah,1 Richard Horowitz2 and Nick S Harris3 1. Vice President, IGeneX Inc., California; 2. Medical Director, Hudson Valley Healing Arts Center, New York; 3. CEO and President, IGeneX Inc., California, US Abstract Lyme disease (LD), caused by the Borrelia burgdorferi complex, is the most frequently reported arthropod-borne infection in North America and Europe. The ticks that transmit LD also carry other pathogens. The two most common co-infections in patients with LD are babesiosis and ehrlichiosis. Human babesiosis is caused by protozoan parasites of the genus Babesia including Babesia microti, Babesia duncani, Babesia divergens, Babesia divergens-like (also known as Babesia MOI), Babesia EU1 and Babesia KO1. Ehrlichiosis includes human sennetsu ehrlichiosis (HSE), human granulocytic anaplasmosis (HGA), human monocytic ehrlichiosis (HME), human ewingii ehrlichiosis (HEE) and the recently discovered human ehrlichiosis Wisconsin–Minnesota (HWME). The resulting illnesses vary from asymptomatic to severe, leading to significant morbidity and mortality, particularly in immunocompromised patients. Clinical signs and symptoms are often non-specific and require the medical provider to have a high degree of suspicion of these infections in order to be recognised. In this article, the causative agents, geographical distribution, clinical findings, diagnosis and treatment protocols are discussed for both babesiosis and ehrlichiosis. Keywords Babesia, Ehrlichia, babesiosis, ehrlichiosis, human, Borrelia Disclosure: Jyotsna Shah and Nick Harris are employees of IGeneX. Richard Horowitz is an employee of Hudson Valley Healing Arts Center. Acknowledgements: The authors would like to thank Eddie Caoili, and Sohini Stone, for providing technical assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Plague Surveillance Protocol
    December 2006 Plague Surveillance Protocol Plague may occur from an unintentional exposure to infected rodents and their fleas or through an intentional exposure such as a bioterrorism (BT) event. When necessary this protocol addresses unintentional and intentional exposures separately; otherwise the protocol applies to both situations. This protocol applies if a case of plague is highly suspected and does not apply to non-specific pulmonary, gastrointestinal, or rash illnesses. Provider Responsibilities 1) Report suspect or confirmed cases of plague immediately by phone to the local health department where the patient is a resident. Complete the provider (yellow) section of the WVEDSS form and forward to the local health department. 2) Notify the infection control practitioner immediately for hospitalized patients. Assure that the case-patient is appropriately isolated using standard and droplet precautions. 3) Assure that the laboratory forwards any isolates of Yersinia pestis to the Office of Laboratory Services for confirmation. The Office of Laboratory Services is available at (304)-558-3530 or on the web at: http://www.wvdhhr.org/labservices/index.cfm 4) Plan to collaborate with public health officials to identify close contacts of patients with pneumonic plague (unprotected face-to-face exposure within 3 feet of the case-patient), including health care workers. Laboratory Responsibilities 1) Report suspect or confirmed Yersinia pestis immediately to: a) The physician; b) The infection control practitioner; and c) The local health department. 2) Reports to the health department should include: Name, full address, date of birth, specimen source, test performed, test result and normal value. Fax a laboratory report or a completed ‘yellow card’ to the local health department.
    [Show full text]
  • Serogroup B Meningococcal Disease
    February 24, 1995 / Vol. 44 / No. 7 121 Serogroup B Meningococcal Disease — Oregon, 1994 124 Trends in Sexual Risk Behaviors Among High School Students — United States, 1990, 1991, and 1993 132 Update: Influenza Activity — New York and United States, 1994–95 Season 135 Notice to Readers Serogroup B Meningococcal Disease — Oregon, 1994 MeningococcalIn Oregon, the Diseaseincidence — ofContinued meningococcal disease has increased substantially, more than doubling from 2.2 cases per 100,000 persons in 1992 to 4.6 per 100,000 in 1994—the highest incidence in Oregon since 1943. This incidence was almost fivefold higher than recent estimates for the United States during 1989–1991 (approximately one case per 100,000 persons annually) (1 ). This report describes meningococcal dis- ease surveillance data from 1994 and summarizes epidemiologic and laboratory data on serogroup B meningococcal disease in Oregon during 1987–1994. During 1994, a total of 143 cases of meningococcal disease was reported to the State Health Division. In 124 cases, Neisseria meningitidis was isolated from a nor- mally sterile site (confirmed cases); in four cases, gram-negative diplococci were detected in specimens obtained from a normally sterile site or in persons who had classic symptoms after contact with a confirmed case (presumed cases). Charac- teristic symptoms (including petechial rash and hypotension) occurred in 14 cases; however, these cases were not culture confirmed (suspected cases). Of 115 isolates for which serogroup was known, 70 (61%) were serogroup B, 40 (35%) were sero- group C, four were serogroup Y, and one was serogroup W-135. When compared with 1992 and 1993, the serogroup-specific incidence in 1994 was higher for both sero- groups B and C.
    [Show full text]