Broker Standard Form of Real Estate Contract
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Freight Payment Terms and "Risk of Loss"
Freight Payment Terms and "Risk of Loss" By: George Carl Pezold We often get questions about which party (the shipper or the consignee) is entitled to file a claim for freight loss or damage. The Uniform Straight Bill of Lading (and most bills of lading used by shippers and carriers) has a provision for identifying the party to whom the carrier should send its freight bills. The "official" version of the bill of lading as published in the National Motor Freight Classification has a box that states: "Freight charges are PREPAID unless marked collect" and a place to "CHECK BOX IF COLLECT". Many bills of lading also have a "Bill To" box if the freight bills are to be sent to someone other than the shipper or the consignee, such as a freight payment agent. It is a common misconception that the identification of the party to pay the freight charges, i.e., whether the freight charges are "prepaid" or "collect", also determines which party should file a claim for loss or damage. The first step in any claim case is to ascertain who has risk of loss in transit. This concept is significant because it determines who has the legal right or obligation to file the claim, and who is the proper “party in interest” in the event of litigation. Under common law and the old Uniform Sales Act, which has been replaced by the Uniform Commercial Code, risk of loss generally followed “title” to the goods. However, under the Uniform Commercial Code, risk of loss is related to “delivery” of the goods. -
The Economic Implications of the Doctrine of Impossibility, 26 Hastings L.J
Hastings Law Journal Volume 26 | Issue 5 Article 5 1-1975 The conomicE Implications of the Doctrine of Impossibility Stephen S. Ashley Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Stephen S. Ashley, The Economic Implications of the Doctrine of Impossibility, 26 Hastings L.J. 1251 (1975). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol26/iss5/5 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. THE ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF THE DOCTRINE OF IMPOSSIBILITY If one accepts as a norm Cardozo's maxim that "[t]he final cause of law is the welfare of society,"' economic theory may provide a useful basis for evaluating the social consequences of legal doctrines. This note will demonstrate the usefulness of applying an economic analysis to the doctrine of impossibility of contract performance, the legal prin- ciple applied to contract disputes which arise when an unforeseen catas- trophe prevents performance of a contract whose terms do not allocate the risk of that catastrophe. The traditional legal analysis, by limiting its view to the allocation of losses which have already occurred and by ignoring the problem of assigning the risk of future losses, has pro- duced inconsistent and arbitrary risk assignments, to society's detri- ment. The proposals of other legal writers would have the same effect. This note will demonstrate through an economic analysis that the law should allocate the risk of disruption unequivocally to the party better able to insure against the risk, subject to reassignment by the parties in their contract. -
United States Real Estate Investment: the Contract Process by Lee A
Property Group | 2003 United States Real Estate Investment: The Contract Process By Lee A. Kuntz* large measure, a reflection of the essential laissez faire * Introduction spirit of the United States economic system. For foreign investors, one of the most important but least In most other countries either by law (primarily statutory understood aspects of an investment in United States real law) or custom, the areas of potential controversy in a real property is the negotiation of a contract of sale and, once estate transaction are largely limited to price and the contract is completed, the closing of the acquisition. payment terms. In a fundamental sense, the basic Because this process differs greatly from the contract question of the merchantability of the property is not at process in most other countries, it is a difficult and often issue, because, as a result of the applicable statutory confusing period for foreign investors. Yet, if they are to provisions, the seller is usually obliged to sell the property protect their interests, they must not only understand the in a merchantable condition and the purchaser is process but join actively in it. This paper will explain the generally assured as to its ownership by registration of its United States contract process to help foreign investors to title. The question of merchantability really becomes participate in it more effectively. important only after the conveyance of the property if the To begin at the beginning, a contract of sale provides the purchaser discovers that the property’s condition does not terms and conditions of the transaction. -
Real Estate in 32 Jurisdictions Worldwide Contributing Editor: Sheri P Chromow 2012
® Real Estate in 32 jurisdictions worldwide Contributing editor: Sheri P Chromow 2012 Published by Getting the Deal Through in association with: Achour & Hájek Advokatfirman Glimstedt Arzinger Barrera, Siqueiros y Torres Landa, SC Biedecki Bin Shabib & Associates (BSA) LLP Divjak, Topi´c & Bahtijarevi´c Law Firm Drakopoulos Law Firm EDAS Law Firm ˙IçtemLegal Attorneys at Law ILA Pasrich & Company Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP Kleyr Grasso Associés Kluge Advokatfirma DA Law Chambers Nicos Papacleovoulou Madrona Hong Mazzuco Brandão – Sociedade de Advogados Nagashima Ohno & Tsunematsu Nnenna Ejekam Associates OMG Oppenländer Rechtsanwälte Orrick Rambaud Martel Reed Smith LLP Schellenberg Wittmer Sultan Al-Abdulla & Partners Thiery & Ortenburger Rechtsanwälte OG Tilleke & Gibbins V&T Law Firm VARUL WongPartnership LLP Zang, Bergel & Viñes Abogados CONTENTS ® Albania Evis Jani and Ekflodia Leskaj Drakopoulos Law Firm 3 Real Estate 2012 Argentina Juan Manuel Quintana, Inés M Poffo, Fernando M Aguinaga and Iván Burin Contributing editor Zang, Bergel & Viñes Abogados 9 Sheri P Chromow Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP Austria Ernst W Ortenburger and Herwig Schönbauer Thiery & Ortenburger Rechtsanwälte OG 17 Business development managers Brazil Maria P Q Brandão Teixeira Madrona Hong Mazzuco Brandão – Sociedade de Advogados 22 Alan Lee George Ingledew China Wang Jihong, Gao Lichun, Zhu Yongchun, Xie Yi, Shi Jie, Zhang Xiaofeng and Gao Lei Robyn Hetherington V&T Law Firm 29 Dan White Marketing managers Croatia Emir Bahtijarevic,´ Marin Vukovic´ and Tena -
Real Estate Contract
REAL ESTATE CONTRACT THIS REAL ESTATE CONTRACT (the “Contract”) is entered into on the _____ day of _________________, 20____ by and between ___________________________________________, hereinafter designated as “Sellers”, and ____________________________________________, and/or their assigns, hereinafter designated as “Buyers”; pursuant to the Buyers offer to purchase from Sellers the property described in Paragraph 1 herein, subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein: 1. Legal Description/Parcel No. and Address: _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ 2. Purchase Price: The purchase price for the Property shall be the exact sum of $_________________________ which is to be tendered by the Buyer with cash paid to Seller at closing. 3. (a) Financing Contingency. This Contract IS NOT conditioned upon Buyer’s ability to obtain financing to purchase the home. Buyer has fourteen (14) business days from the date of this Contract is signed, to obtain financing. Buyer shall inform Seller in writing that financing has been secured within fourteen (14) business days or this Contract is fully terminated and the Earnest Money shall be returned to Buyer. (b) Inspection Contingency. Buyer has ten (10) business days from acceptance of this offer to conduct an inspection. Buyer may rescind this offer for any reason whatsoever within that ten (10) day period by providing written notice to the title company, which shall immediately return the Earnest Money to the Buyer. In this event, this Contract shall be null and void and the parties shall have no rights one to the other. 4. Earnest Money: Within twenty-four (24) hours of execution of this Contract by Buyer and Seller, Buyer shall tender a signed copy of this Contract, along with a check in the amount of $___________________(the “Earnest Money”) payable to Capital Abstract & Title Co., LLC (the “Title Company”). -
Acceptance and Receipt: an Anomaly in the Statute of Frauds Minn
University of Minnesota Law School Scholarship Repository Minnesota Law Review 1953 Acceptance and Receipt: An Anomaly in the Statute of Frauds Minn. L. Rev. Editorial Board Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Editorial Board, Minn. L. Rev., "Acceptance and Receipt: An Anomaly in the Statute of Frauds" (1953). Minnesota Law Review. 2712. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr/2712 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Minnesota Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Minnesota Law Review collection by an authorized administrator of the Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ACCEPTANCE AND RECEIPT: AN ANOMALY IN THE STATUTE OF FRAUDS The enactment of the English Statute of Frauds' in 1677 has been attributed to the ineffectual trial procedure of that period.2 Both the practice of awarding new trials and the development of the rules of evidence were in a formative stage.3 At that time juries could reject the evidence heard and reach a verdict on their own privately secured information,4 and the parties to the action, who were not familiar with the facts, could not testify.5 Fraud and perjury were to be prevented primarily by removing from juries any determination of liability in certain cases unless the statutory formalities were met.6 Furthermore, the turbulent times following the Civil War, the Commonwealth, and the Restoration probably encouraged claims without any foundation. 7 The present day statutes of frauds which relate to the sale of goods are derived from Section seventeen of the English Statute of Frauds. -
CHICAGO ASSOCIATION of REALTORS® EXCLUSIVE BUYER - BROKER AGREEMENT This Contract Is Intended to Be a Binding Real Estate Contract Rev
CHICAGO ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® EXCLUSIVE BUYER - BROKER AGREEMENT This Contract is Intended to be a Binding Real Estate Contract Rev. 01/2012 1 1. BROKER. This Exclusive Buyer-Broker Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into by and between ____________________________ 2 _________________________________________________ ("Broker") and __________________________________________________________ ("Buyer"). 3 Broker agrees to appoint a sales associate affiliated with Broker to act as the Buyer's designated agent ("Buyer's Designated Agent") for the 4 purpose of assisting Buyer in identifying and negotiating the acquisition of residential real estate ("Property") and Buyer agrees to grant 5 Buyer's Designated Agent the exclusive right ("Exclusive Right") to represent Buyer in such acquisition per the terms and conditions set forth 6 in this Agreement. The terms "acquire" or "acquisition" shall mean the purchase (title transfer or Articles of Agreement for deed), lease, 7 exchange, or contract for the option to purchase Property by Buyer or anyone acting on Buyer's behalf. 8 2. TERM. Broker's Exclusive Right shall extend from the Effective Date, as set forth on page 3 ("Commencement Date"), until 11:59 9 P.M. on ___________________________, 20___, at which time this Agreement shall automatically terminate ("Termination Date"). 10 3. COMPENSATION. Broker shall seek to be paid a commission from the listing broker under a cooperative brokerage arrangement 11 or from the seller if there is no listing broker. In the event that the seller or listing broker does not pay Broker a commission, then 12 Buyer shall pay Broker at the time of closing, compensation equal to _______% [percent] of the purchase price of the Property 13 which Buyer acquires during the Term of this Agreement (“Acquisition Commission”), whether or not the Property has been 14 identified by Broker to Buyer. -
In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama Southern Division
Case 2:11-cv-01183-AKK Document 54 Filed 03/28/13 Page 1 of 36 FILED 2013 Mar-28 PM 04:05 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE ) INSURANCE COMPANY, ) ) Plaintiff / Counter Defendant, ) ) Civil Action Number vs. ) 2:11-cv-1183-AKK ) GUSTER LAW FIRM, LLC, et ) al., ) ) Defendants / Counter Claimants ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER A fire destroyed commercial property insured by Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company. Nationwide’s investigation of the ensuing claim revealed discrepancies in the details outlined in the insurance applications, including, among other things, the age of the property, the identity of the true owner, and its occupancy and habitability status. Nationwide subsequently filed this action against its insured, Guster Law Firm, LLC, alleging that Guster Law had no insurable interest in the property and that its applications contained material misrepresentations or were fraudulent. Nationwide seeks a declaratory judgment as to the rights and liabilities of the parties under both the commercial property Page 1 of 36 Case 2:11-cv-01183-AKK Document 54 Filed 03/28/13 Page 2 of 36 and general liability policies.1 Doc. 1. Guster Law and Guster Properties, LLC, the true owner of the insured property, filed a counterclaim alleging breach of contract, bad faith refusal to pay the insurance claims, and reformation of the named insured in the insurance policies due to mutual mistake. Doc. 15. Nationwide moved for summary judgment contending that it is not liable for the loss, doc. -
CHICAGO ASSOCIATION of REALTORS® Condominium Real Estate Purchase and Sale Contract
CHICAGO ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® Condominium Real Estate Purchase and Sale Contract (including condominium townhomes and commercial condominiums) This Contract is Intended to be a Binding Real Estate Contract 1 1. Contract. This Condominium Real Estate Purchase and Sale Contract ("Contract") is made by and between 2 ___________________________________________________________("Buyer"), and ___________________________________________________________ ("Seller") 3 (Buyer and Seller collectively, ("Parties"), with respect to the purchase and sale of the real estate and improvements located at 4 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________("Property"). 5 The Property P.I.N. # is ________________________________________________. 6 The Property includes parking space number(s) _____________, which is (check all that apply) o deeded, o limited common element, o assigned, o indoor, o outdoor. 7 If deeded, the parking P.I.N.# is: ____________________________________________. The Property includes storage space/locker number(s) _________________, which 8 is (check all that apply) o deeded, o limited common element, o assigned. If deed, the storage space/locker P.I.N.# is: ________________________________________. 9 2. Fixtures and Personal Property. At Closing (as defined in Paragraph 8 of this Contract), in addition to the Property, Seller shall transfer to Buyer by a Bill of Sale 10 all heating, cooling, electrical and plumbing systems, and the following checked -
Chicago Association of Realtors® Condominium Real Estate Purchase and Sale Contract
CHICAGO ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® CONDOMINIUM REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AND SALE CONTRACT (including condominium townhomes and commercial condominiums) This Contract is Intended to be a Binding Real Estate Contract © 2015 by Chicago Association of REALTORS® - All rights reserved 1 1. Contract. This Condominium Real Estate Purchase and Sale Contract ("Contract") is made by and between 2 BUYER(S):_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________("Buyer"), and 3 SELLER(S): ________________________________________________________________________________ ("Seller") (Buyer and Seller collectively, 4 "Parties"), with respect to the purchase and sale of the real estate and improvements located at 5 PROPERTY ADDRESS: __________________________________________________________________________________________________("Property"). 6 (address) (unit #) (city) (state) (zip) 7 The Property P.I.N. # is ____________________________________________. Approximate square feet of Property (excluding parking):________________. 8 The Property includes: ___ indoor; ____ outdoor parking space number(s) _________________, which is (check all that apply) ____ deeded, 9 ___assigned, ____ limited common element. If deeded, the parking P.I.N.#: ______________________________________. The property includes storage 10 space/locker number(s)_____________, which is ___deeded, ___assigned, ___limited common element. If deeded, the storage space/locker 11 P.I.N.#______________________________________. 12 2. Fixtures -
Capacity to Bear Loss As a Factor in the Decision of Certain Types of Tort Cases L
April, i93i CAPACITY TO BEAR LOSS AS A FACTOR IN THE DECISION OF CERTAIN TYPES OF TORT CASES L. W. FEEZER In a previous issue of the University of Pennsylvania Law Review the writer discussed under the present title a number of tort cases involving municipal corporations.' The purpose was to point out what seemed to be a noticeable tendency in recent cases to depart from the rule that a municipal corporation is not liable for torts arising in connection with a municipal function. It was suggested that this tendency may be due in part to a desire to place the burden of loss through injury where it can be borne with the least hardship. It was noted that this is attained by placing it where it can be absorbed with a lesser probability of creating further problems of social adjustment. When the bur- den in such cases is put upon the defendant, that defendant can distribute the loss burden over a considerable group, viz., the body of tax-payers. In this way the loss is ultimately born by the social organization for whose benefit the risk producing agency was brought into existence. The industrialization and mechanization of social organiza- tion has brought into existence for the benefit of society great organizations whose activities involve dangers of injury which were not present in the simpler and more rural organization of earlier times. This is not to say that life is less secure now than when "Adam delved and Eve span", but security of life is menaced by risks traceable to the "conveniences" which have come to be regarded as necessities in modern life and which are provided through great business organizations. -
Multi-Board Residential Real Estate Contract 6.0
MULTI-BOARD RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE CONTRACT 6.0 1 1. THE PARTIES: Buyer and Seller are hereinafter referred to as the “Parties”. 2 Buyer Name(s) [please print] 3 Seller Name(s) [please print] 4 If Dual Agency Applies, Complete Optional Paragraph 31. 5 2. THE REAL ESTATE: Real Estate shall be defined as the property, all improvements, the fixtures and Personal 6 Property included therein. Seller agrees to convey to Buyer or to Buyer’s designated grantee, the Real Estate 7 with approximate lot size or acreage of commonly known as: 8 9 Address City State Zip 10 11 County Unit # (If applicable) Permanent Index Number(s) of Real Estate 12 If Condo/Coop/Townhome Parking is Included: # of spaces(s) ; identified as Space(s) # ; 13 [check type] deeded space, PIN: limited common element assigned space. 14 3. PURCHASE PRICE: The Purchase Price shall be $ . After the payment of 15 Earnest Money as provided below, the balance of the Purchase Price, as adjusted by prorations, shall be paid at 16 Closing in “Good Funds” as defined by law. 17 4. EARNEST MONEY: Earnest Money shall be held in trust for the mutual benefit of the Parties by [check one]: 18 Seller’s Brokerage; Buyer’s Brokerage; As otherwise agreed by the Parties, as “Escrowee”. 19 Initial Earnest Money of $ shall be tendered to Escrowee on or before day(s) after Date 20 of Acceptance. Additional Earnest Money of $ shall be tendered by , 20 . 21 5. FIXTURES AND PERSONAL PROPERTY AT NO ADDITIONAL COST: All of the fixtures and included Personal 22 Property are owned by Seller and to Seller’s knowledge are in operating condition on the Date of Acceptance, 23 unless otherwise stated herein.