DOCSLIB.ORG

THE MOST IMPORTANT INSECT PESTS in FOREST ECOSYSTEMS of VOJVODINA and THEIR SUPPRESSION DURING the PERIOD 2004-2013 Predrag

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE MOST IMPORTANT INSECT PESTS in FOREST ECOSYSTEMS of VOJVODINA and THEIR SUPPRESSION DURING the PERIOD 2004-2013 Predrag Silva Balcanica, 15(2)/2014 THE MOST IMPORTANT INSECT PESTS IN FOREST ECOSYSTEMS OF VOJVODINA AND THEIR SUPPRESSION DURING THE PERIOD 2004-2013 Predrag Pap, Milan Drekić, Leopold Poljaković-Pajnik, Miroslav Marković, Verica Vasić Institute of Lowland Forestry and Environment University of Novi Sad Abstract The paper presents a chronological survey of the most important insect pests identified in Vojvodina forests during the period 2004 - 2013, and the activities on their monitoring and suppression. To protect the forests against insect pests, their characteristics have to be known, they should be detected in time, and finally sup- pressed by the most efficient methods and means. During the past period, the health state of forest ecosystems was satisfactory, which is the best proof of the good team work of the professionals and scientists in this field, so it can be a good example to forest profession in general. Key words: Vojvodina, forest ecosystems, insect pests, protection, control INTRODUCTION Vojvodina is a region in the southern part of the Pannonian Plain with the lowest percentage of forests in Europe. Forests and forest plantations occupy 137,000 ha, so forest cover accounts for only 6.4% of the area. The largest forest complexes are located on Fruška Gora, Vršačke Planine, Deliblatska Peščara and Subotička Peščara and along the large rivers – Danube, Tisza, Sava, Bosut, and Tamiš. With the exception of the above complexes, there are almost no forests, or they occur in fragments. The low percentage of forests and their uneven distri- bution in this specific primarily agricultural area makes the forests in Vojvodina especially endangered ecosystems. In addition to specific climate, edaphic, and hydrological conditions which are mainly decisive in the selection of the tech- nology and the species for the establishment of forests and plantations, it is very important to investigate the significance of pests and their impact on the vitality and survival of forest ecosystems. Among numerous pests identified in forests, plantations and nurseries, insect pests hold a special place and significance. During the period 2004-2013, intensive monitoring of insect pests consisted of numer- ous health inspections of Vojvodina forests, plantations and nurseries. Thanks to a 68 well-organised service for forecasting and reporting activities managed by Insti- tute of Lowland Forestry and Environment, the situation was regularly updated, the population levels of insect pests were analysed, as well as the need for sup- pression measures using the most favourable methods. Based on the reports of the forecasting and reporting service, official documents, records, and our authentic notes and observations, this paper provides a chronological overview of the most important insect pests in Vojvodina forests during the period 2004-2013. The data collected on insect pests in this area are not only of local significance, but also of wider significance for forestry profession. The aim of this paper was to inform forestry professionals on the most impor- tant insect pests in forest ecosystems in Vojvodina, as well as on the measures that were taken for their suppression within the study period. INSECT PESTS IN FORESTS, PLANTATIONS AND NURSERIES AND THEIR CONTROL Lymantria dispar L. – gipsy moth It is evaluated as the major threat of broadleaf forests in Vojvodina. From the historical aspect, this pest has always been present in the forests of oaks and other tree species, often occurring in enormous proportions, i.e. in densities fatal for forest sustainable management and maintenance if control measures are not undertaken. During the past decade, gipsy moth outbreaks occurred during the periods 2004- 2006 and 2010-2013; it was successfully suppressed both from the air and from the ground on large areas (Table 1). The seventeenth gipsy moth outbreak in Vojvodina started in 2003. Aerial suppression was organised and carried out during 2004-2006 in the most infested forests (Drekić et al. 2006). In 2004, in the area of Forest Estate Sremska Mitrovica, oak stands were treated in Posavina (loc. Senajske Bare II – Karakuša) on 1521.0 ha, preparation Decis 2.5-EC (Table 1). The largest forest complexes in Vojvodina were treated in 2005. In the area of Forest Estate Sombor, oak stands were treated at Monoštorske Šume (3580.5 ha) and Karapandža (1698.7 ha), and a smaller part in the forests managed by the Public Water Management Company ‘Vode Vojvodine’ (328.5 ha). In Forest Estate Sremska Mitrovica, small complexes of oak stands were treated from the air at the sites Radinska-Vranjak (99.7 ha) and Rađenovci-Novi (314.4 ha). In the above actions, the biotechnical preparation Dimilin SC-480 and insecticide Decis 2.5-EC were applied over the area of 6,021.8 ha (Table 1). In the spring 2006, gipsy moth was suppressed from the air in oak stands in Posavina (loc. Rađenovci-Novi) using the preparation Decis 2.5-EC (244.5 ha), and experimentally using the bio-pesticide based on Bacillus thuringiensis (143.4 ha). All the above aerial actions were assessed as very successful in all stages, both from the organisa- tional aspects and from the aspect of undertaken activities. The result of gipsy moth suppression from the air and from the ground was its multiple reduction in the in- 69 Table 1 Areas infested by gipsy moth in Vojvodina prior to caterpillar hatching and areas treated from the air and from the ground during the period 2004-2013 Total Gipsy moth infested Gipsy moth suppression from the air (ha) and the applied suppression Year area preparations from the (ha) ground (ha) Decis 2.5-EC (active substance deltamethrin) 2004 18 316.0 1521.0 (0.2 L/ha + 2.8 L naphtha D 1/ha) 16 795.0 (FE Sremska Mitrovica, 1521.0 ha) Decis 2.5-EC (a.s. deltamethrin) (0.2 L/ha + 2.8 L naphtha D1/ha) (FE Sombor, 2624.2 ha; FE Sremska Mitrovica, 414.1 ha) 2005 18 145.0 6,021.9 Dimilin SC-480 12 123.1 (a.s. diflubenzuron) (180 mL/ha + 0.8 L white oil/ha + 3.2 L water/ha) (FE Sombor, 2655.1 ha; PWMC ‘Vode Vojvodine’, 328.5 ha) Decis 2.5-EC (a.s. deltamethrin) (0.2 L/ha + 2.8 L naphtha D1/ha; 244.5 ha) 2006 2222.7 387.9 1834.8 Bacillus thuringiensis (experimental, 143.4 ha) (FE Sremska Mitrovica, 387.9 ha) 2007 794.1 - - 794.1 2008 442.5 - - 442.5 Etiol-ULV (a.s. malathion) (1l/ha + 2l naphtha/ha; 88,7 ha) 2009 506.2 132.8 Avaunt 15-SC 373.4 (a.s. indoxacarb) (experimental, 44.1 ha) (FE ‘Banat’ – Pančevo, 132.8 ha) 2010 2179.5 - - 2026.5 Foray 48B (3l/ha) 2011 6013.3 4,066.0 (Bt subsp. kurstaki) 1947.3 (FE Sremska Mitrovica, 4,066.0 ha) Laser 240SC (a.s. spinosad) 2012 6100.1 1,893.4 4206.7 (0.1 L/ha + 1.5 L white oil/ha + 1.4 L water/ha) (FE Sremska Mitrovica, 1893.4 ha) 2013 3,131.5 - - 423.3 fested area, so in the summer and autumn 2006, gipsy moth egg masses were found on 794.1 ha, i.e. on about 23 times smaller area compared to the outbreak culmina- tion in 2004 and 2005 (Table 1). In poplar plantations at Gornje Potamišje (Forest Estate ‘Banat’ – Pančevo), 70 the gipsy moth was permanently present during the past period. The infestations were repeated each year, because a part of egg masses deposited on higher posi- tions on the trees could not be treated nor soaked with naphtha. In the spring 2009, it was decided to perform aerial spraying of the plantations with the preparation Etiol ULV on 88.7 ha. The preparation Avaunt 15SC was applied experimentally on 44.1 ha (Table 1). Unfortunately, Avaunt 15SC had no effect on gipsy moth cat- erpillars, so the trees were defoliated. As it could be expected, gipsy moth repeated the attack in the following year. Owing to the presence of flood water during the winter and spring 2010, the egg masses were not soaked, so caterpillars consumed 70% of the foliage – predominantly in the plantations nearing the end of the rota- tion. In this area, gipsy moth has been in the decline phase from 2011. In our opin- ion, the multiannual, chronic gipsy moth infestations in poplar plantations in the area of Gornje Potamišje are the consequence of a less favourable site (humogley) for poplar cultivation. Gipsy moth reappeared over large areas in Vojvodina in 2010 (2179.5 ha). In the infested forests and plantations, the egg masses were soaked with naphtha, but with partial success, as the outbreak was not stopped. In the spring 2011, just before caterpillar hatching, gipsy moth egg masses were detected in Vojvodina on 6013.3 ha of forests and plantations – predominantly in the area of Forest Estate Sremska Mitrovica. The most frequently infested forests of this Estate were treated from the air in the spring 2011 using the preparation Foray 48B on the area of 4066.0 ha (loc. Đepuš, Radinska-Vranjak, Senajske Bare II-Karakuša, Grabovačko-Vitojevačko Os- Fig. 1. Gipsy moth caterpillar killed by Fig. 2. Gipsy moth caterpillars killed by nuclear polyhedrosis virus (FE Sremska Entomophaga maimaiga (FE Sremska Mitrovica, loc. Galovača, June l0th, 2013) Mitrovica, loc. Naklo, June l3th, 2013) 71 trvo and Matijevica-Kadionica). An additional aerial spraying was undertaken in the spring 2012. Oak stands at Rađenovci-Novi, Kućine-Naklo-Klještevica and Senajske Bare II-Karakuša were treated with the insecticide Laser 240SC on 1893.4 ha (Table 1). The actions were evaluated as very successful in all segments, so in the summer and autumn 2012, gipsy moth egg masses were found on significantly smaller areas and in far lower numbers.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WWF Adria Implements the Project: Protected Areas for Nature And
    Protected Areas for Nature and People – NP Durmitor, Montenegro © Martin Šolar, WWF Adria FACTSHEET 2016 WWF ADRIA IMPLEMENTS THE PROJECT: Protected Areas for Project Title: Nature and People Protected Areas for Nature and People, PA4NP The purpose of the project “Protected Areas for Nature and People”, implemented by WWF Adria since October 2015, is sustainable use of natural resources in the Region: Albania, Bosnia Dinaric Arc region as a foundation for the socio-economic development. To that and Herzegovina, Croatia, end, WWF, together with its partners, will strive to achieve the following targets: Kosovo*, Macedonia, • To introduce examples of how protected areas can generate social Montenegro, Slovenia and economic benefits in cooperation with the local community, and Serbia • To improve cooperation between the protected areas Duration: and the local community in the entire region, October 2015 – • To enhance cooperation between WWF and its partners on the one October 2019 side and decision-makers and those who have impact on them on the other side at the national level. Donor and Value: Swedish International Development WWF will use the examples of socio-economic benefits of well-managed parks, as Cooperation Agency (Sida), well as argumentation and information required for decision-making to encourage 4,200,000 EUR decision-makers from 8 countries in the region to deliver on their promises made under the “Big Win for Dinaric Arc”, a document they adopted in 2013. This is WWF’s contribution with the aim of achieving the targets
    [Show full text]
  • Fauna Lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis" 150 Years Later: Changes and Additions
    ©Ges. zur Förderung d. Erforschung von Insektenwanderungen e.V. München, download unter www.zobodat.at Atalanta (August 2000) 31 (1/2):327-367< Würzburg, ISSN 0171-0079 "Fauna lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis" 150 years later: changes and additions. Part 5. Noctuidae (Insecto, Lepidoptera) by Vasily V. A n ik in , Sergey A. Sachkov , Va d im V. Z o lo t u h in & A n drey V. Sv ir id o v received 24.II.2000 Summary: 630 species of the Noctuidae are listed for the modern Volgo-Ural fauna. 2 species [Mesapamea hedeni Graeser and Amphidrina amurensis Staudinger ) are noted from Europe for the first time and one more— Nycteola siculana Fuchs —from Russia. 3 species ( Catocala optata Godart , Helicoverpa obsoleta Fabricius , Pseudohadena minuta Pungeler ) are deleted from the list. Supposedly they were either erroneously determinated or incorrect noted from the region under consideration since Eversmann 's work. 289 species are recorded from the re­ gion in addition to Eversmann 's list. This paper is the fifth in a series of publications1 dealing with the composition of the pres­ ent-day fauna of noctuid-moths in the Middle Volga and the south-western Cisurals. This re­ gion comprises the administrative divisions of the Astrakhan, Volgograd, Saratov, Samara, Uljanovsk, Orenburg, Uralsk and Atyraus (= Gurjev) Districts, together with Tataria and Bash­ kiria. As was accepted in the first part of this series, only material reliably labelled, and cover­ ing the last 20 years was used for this study. The main collections are those of the authors: V. A n i k i n (Saratov and Volgograd Districts), S.
    [Show full text]
  • UNDP SRB PA.Pdf
    TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I: SITUATION ANALYSIS .................................................................................................... 4 1.1. Context, global significance, environmental, institutional and policy background ........ 4 1.2 Threats and root-causes ....................................................................................................... 7 1.3 Desired long-term vision and barriers to achieving it ....................................................... 7 1.4 Stakeholder analysis ............................................................................................................. 9 1.5 Baseline analysis .................................................................................................................. 10 PART II: STRATEGY ...................................................................................................................... 13 2.1 Project Rationale and Conformity to GEF Policies and Strategic Objectives .............. 13 2.2 Country Ownership: Country Eligibility and Country Drivenness ............................... 13 2.3 Design principles and strategic considerations ................................................................ 14 2.4 Project Objective, Outcomes and Outputs/Activities ...................................................... 15 2.5 Financial modality .............................................................................................................. 22 2.6 Indicators, Risks and Assumptions ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina Joint Opinion on the Legal
    Strasbourg, Warsaw, 9 December 2019 CDL-AD(2019)026 Opinion No. 951/2019 Or. Engl. ODIHR Opinion Nr.:FoA-BiH/360/2019 EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) OSCE OFFICE FOR DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS AND HUMAN RIGHTS (OSCE/ODIHR) BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA JOINT OPINION ON THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK GOVERNING THE FREEDOM OF PEACEFUL ASSEMBLY IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA, IN ITS TWO ENTITIES AND IN BRČKO DISTRICT Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 121st Plenary Session (Venice, 6-7 December 2019) On the basis of comments by Ms Claire BAZY-MALAURIE (Member, France) Mr Paolo CAROZZA (Member, United States of America) Mr Nicolae ESANU (Substitute member, Moldova) Mr Jean-Claude SCHOLSEM (substitute member, Belgium) This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-AD(2019)026 - 2 - Table of Contents I. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 3 II. Background and Scope of the Opinion ...................................................................... 4 III. International Standards .............................................................................................. 5 IV. Legal context and legislative competence .................................................................. 6 V. Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 8 A. Definitions of public assembly ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (Microsoft Powerpoint
    Bosnia and Herzegowina with Koch International Terminal Departure on via SI-Ljubljana TUE FR Posavina PLZ 76 Una Sana Republika Srpska Regular delivery time: PLZ 77,79 PLZ 78 Tuzla 5-6 working days PLZ 74,75 till terminal SI-Ljubljana Zenica- Doboj Delivery to consignee upon request, PLZ 72,74 depending on clarification of Zentralbosnien Bosnisches Herceg PLZ 70,72 Podrinje Bosna Sarajevo PLZ 73 customs formalities. PLZ 80 Herzegowina Neretva • You can find descriptions of the products and the general terms and conditions at: www.koch-international.de/en/service/download- area/ West Herzegowina Daily rate requests PLZ 80,88 [email protected] Dispatch / Order to [email protected] Croatia with Koch International Terminal at Departure on via SI-Ljubljana TUE FR Medimurje PLZ 40 Krapina- Varazdin Koprivnica- Zagorje PLZ 42 Krizevci PLZ 49 PLZ 48 Zagreb Bjelovar- Virovitica- Regular delivery time: Zagreb Stadt Bilogora Podravina PLZ 10 5-7 working days PLZ 43 PLZ 33 Osijek-Baranja Primorje- Pozega-Slawonien PLZ 31 Gorski Kotar Sisak-Moslavina PLZ 34 Booking options Istrien PLZ 51 Karlovac PLZ 44 Vukovar- PLZ 52 PLZ 47 Srijem Brod-Posavina PLZ 32 PLZ 35 Lika-Senj PLZ53 5-6 days Zadar PLZ 23 5-6 days Silbenik- Knin 6-7 days PLZ 22 • You can find descriptions of the products and the general terms Split- and conditions at: www.koch-international.de/en/service/download- Dalmatien area/ Daily rate requests Dubrovnik-Neretva [email protected] PLZ 20 Dispatch / Order to [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • SERBIE G R I E (Plus De 1 100 000 Hab.) O N SZEGED H MAKÓ V
    vers BUDAPEST 20° vers BÉKÉSCSABA vers BUDAPEST vers ORADEA 22° 21° vers BUCAREST Capitale d'État SERBIE G R I E (plus de 1 100 000 hab.) O N SZEGED H MAKÓ v. BUDAPEST 19° NADLAC ARAD Plus de 200 000 hab. E PÉCS B Plus de 100 000 hab. ) SÂNNICOLAU MARE Mures U A N Kanjiza A N 46° D U Subotica Novi R LIPOVA Plus de 50 000 hab. D vers CRAIOVA ( nca Knezevac ra A 46° MOHÁCS BAČKA DU NORD K B A N A T r Coka O Plus de 25 000 hab. i B A Č K A v a a ic j Senta t a a D E L ’ O U E S T l D U N O R D Z Plus de 10 000 hab. Bačka Topola Kikinda U BELI MANASTIR Ada (SEVERNI JIMBOLIA vers VARAZDIN Sombor (SEVERNA BAČKA) Autre ville ou localité I I BANAT) I a DRA I g V I Mali Idos TIMISOARA e M E I B I V I e Crvenka ( li I k Nova D i I VOÏVODINE I Pirot Chef-lieu d'okrug (district) R k I Crnja A I a (province autonome) Apatin n Kula s I LUGOS V a I i j A I l I m ) M e i (Z A P A D N A I Becej Novi Becej l T OSIJEK I I I g a I a I I e n A Autoroute a l I I I B k i CRAIOVA B A Č K A) I I I i I I I I Vrbas I I I r I i T ta k k I S s a I I j vers I e n S g Srbobran B A I N A T a A e Route principale I CRUCENI l B Odzaci I BAČKAI DU SUD C R O A T I E GATAIA I Bîrza v a Zitiste N I s i V I u D Temerin ka Backi A Bac m Route secondaire N I C E N T R A L a DETA ( I D Petrovac U I T U B I I N Zabali Boka E I I Secanj VINKOVCI A I I I V Zrenjanin Autre route VUKOVAR I ) Novi Sad I I (SREDNJI BANAT) I I vers ZAGREB I I I I JAMU (JUŽNI BAČKA) I Backa Palanka Plandiste Futog K I MARE Titel a I Voie ferrée n I B a l I o sut Beocin D I u E I 641 vers CRAIOVA n D a
    [Show full text]
  • THE POSAVINA BORDER REGION of CROATIA and BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA: DEVELOPMENT up to 1918 (With Special Reference to Changes in Ethnic Composition)
    THE POSAVINA BORDER REGION OF CROATIA AND BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA: DEVELOPMENT UP TO 1918 (with special reference to changes in ethnic composition) Ivan CRKVEN^I] Zagreb UDK: 94(497.5-3 Posavina)''15/19'':323.1 Izvorni znanstveni rad Primljeno: 9. 9. 2003. After dealing with the natural features and social importance of the Posavina region in the past, presented is the importance of this region as a unique Croatian ethnic territory during the Mid- dle Ages. With the appearance of the Ottomans and especially at the beginning of the 16th century, great ethnic changes oc- cured, primarily due to the expulsion of Croats and arrival of new ethnic groups, mostly Orthodox Vlachs and later Muslims and ethnic Serbs. With the withdrawal of the Ottomans from the Pannonian basin to the areas south of the Sava River and the Danube, the Sava becomes the dividing line creating in its border areas two socially and politically different environments: the Slavonian Military Frontier on the Slavonian side and the Otto- man military-frontier system of kapitanates on the Bosnian side. Both systems had a special influence on the change of ethnic composition in this region. With the withdrawal of the Ottomans further towards the southeast of Europe and the Austrian occu- pation of Bosnia and Herzegovina the Sava River remains the border along which, especially on the Bosnian side, further changes of ethnic structure occured. Ivan Crkven~i}, Ilo~ka 34, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia. E-mail: [email protected] INTRODUCTION The research subject in this work is the border region Posavi- na between the Republic of Croatia and the Republic Bosnia- 293 -Herzegovina.
    [Show full text]
  • Decision on Prosecution's Motion for Admission of Evidence from the Bar Table
    IT-03-67-T 14/46371BIS D14 - 1II46371BIS UNITED 04 March 2010 MC NATIONS International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Case No.: IT -03-67 -T Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed Date: 19 February 2010 in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since 1991 ENGLISH • Original: French IN TRIAL CHAMBER III Before: Judge Jean-Claude Antonetti, Presiding Judge Frederik HarhotT Judge Flavia Lattanzi Registrar: Mr John Hocking Decision of: 19 February 2010 THE PROSECUTOR v. VOJISLA V SESELJ PUBLIC DOCUMENT WITH ANNEX DECISION ON PROSECUTION'S MOTION FOR ADMISSION OF EVIDENCE FROM THE BAR TABLE The Office of the Prosecutor Mr Mathias Marcussen The Accused Mr Vojislav Seselj PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/8bff65/ 13/46371BIS 1. Trial Chamber III ("Chamber") of the International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the former Yugoslavia since 1991 ("Tribunal") is seized of a motion filed by the Office of the Prosecutor ("Prosecution") on 26 February 2009 for the admission, pursuant to Rule 89(C) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence ("Rules"), of evidence from the bar table ("Motion"). 1 I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 2. On 26 February 2009, the Prosecution submitted a Motion for the admission in the present case of 142 documents listed in Annex A to the Motion ("Annex A"). Furthermore, it sought leave to exceed the word limit. 2 3. The Accused did not file a response to this Motion within fourteen days ofthe day he received the version thereof in BCS, a time-limit granted to him under Rule l26bis of the Rules.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Wetlands and Floodplain Areas in the Danube River Basin Final Report May 1999
    DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME EVALUATION OF WETLANDS AND FLOODPLAIN AREAS IN THE DANUBE RIVER BASIN FINAL REPORT MAY 1999 Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance prepared by WWF Danube-Carpathian-Programme and WWF-Auen-Institut (Germany) DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME EVALUATION OF WETLANDS AND FLOODPLAIN AREAS IN THE DANUBE RIVER BASIN FINAL REPORT MAY 1999 Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance prepared by WWF Danube-Carpathian-Programme and WWF-Auen-Institut (Germany) Preface The "Evaluation of Wetlands and Flkoodplain Areas in the Danube River Basin" study was prepared in the frame of the Danube Pollution Reduction Programme (PRP). The Study has been undertaken to define priority wetland and floodplain rehabilitation sites as a component of the Pollution reduction Programme. The present report addresses the identification of former floodplains and wetlands in the Danube River Basin, as well as the description of the current status and evaluation of the ecological importance of the potential for rehabilitation. Based on this evaluation, 17 wetland/floodplain sites have been identified for rehabilitation considering their ecological importance, their nutrient removal capacity and their role in flood protection. Most of the identified wetlands will require transboundary cooperation and represent an important first step in retoring the ecological balance in the Danube River Basin. The results are presented in the form of thematic maps that can be found in Annex I of the study. The study was prepared by the WWF-Danube-Carpathian-Programme and the WWF-Auen-Institut (Institute for Floodplains Ecology, WWF-Germany), under the guidance of the UNDP/GEF team of experts of the Danube Programme Coordination Unit (DPCU) in Vienna, Austria.
    [Show full text]
  • Jedinica Lokalne Samouprave Grad/Mesto Naziv Marketa Adresa Ada Ada TSV DISKONT Lenjinova 44A Ada Ada TSV Diskont Lenjinova 24 A
    Jedinica lokalne samouprave Grad/Mesto Naziv marketa Adresa Ada Ada TSV DISKONT Lenjinova 44a Ada Ada TSV Diskont Lenjinova 24 Ada Ada Univerexport SABO SEPEŠI LASLA 88 Ada Ada Trgopromet LENJINOVA 44A Ada Ada DUDI CO D.O.O. Lenjinova 15 Ada Ada DTL - AD Senta Promet TP Bakoš Kalmana 1 Ada Ada DTL - AD Senta Promet TP Žarka Zrenjanina 12 Ada Ada DTL - AD Senta Promet TP Karadjordjeva br 61 Ada Ada DTL - AD Senta Promet TP Ul. Save Kovačevića 1 Ada Ada Gomex Lenjinova 2 Ada Mol TSV Diskont Maršala Tita 75 Ada Mol DTL - AD Senta Promet TP Ul Đure Daničića 24 Ada Mol Gomex Maršala Tita 50 Aleksandrovac Aleksandrovac TSV DISKONT 29. Novembra 48 Aleksandrovac Aleksandrovac TR Lukić ITS Gornje Rateje BB Aleksandrovac Aleksandrovac STR Popović 29. Novembar 105/2 Aleksandrovac Aleksandrovac STR Popović Kruševačka BB Aleksandrovac Aleksandrovac Str Mira Dobroljupci BB Aleksandrovac Aleksandrovac Mesara Glidžić 29 Novembra bb Aleksandrovac Aleksandrovac IM Biftek Niš 29.novembar br.86 Aleksandrovac Aleksandrovac DIS 10. Avgusta bb, 37230 Aleksandrovac Aleksandrovac Garevina STUR TOŠA GAREVINA Garevina Aleksinac Aleksinac PD SUPERMARKETI AS DOO KNJAZA MILOSA 40 Aleksinac Aleksinac PD SUPERMARKETI AS DOO KNJAZA MILOSA 138-144 Aleksinac Aleksinac PD SUPERMARKETI AS DOO MOMČILA POPOVIĆA 128 Aleksinac Aleksinac SL Market Knjaza Milosa 77 Aleksinac Aleksinac IM Biftek Niš Majora Tepića br.11 Aleksinac Aleksinac IM Biftek Niš Momčila Popovića br. 19 Aleksinac Aleksinac Kneza Miloša 80 Aleksinac Aleksinac Apoteka Arnika Momčila Popovića 23 Aleksinac Aleksinac
    [Show full text]
  • Ent18 2 117 121 (Kravchenko Et Al).Pmd
    Russian Entomol. J. 18(2): 117121 © RUSSIAN ENTOMOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 2009 The Eariadinae and Chloephorinae (Lepidoptera: Noctuoidea, Nolidae) of Israel: distribution, phenology and ecology Eariadinae è Chloephorinae (Lepidoptera: Noctuoidea, Nolidae) Èçðàèëÿ: ðàñïðåäåëåíèå, ôåíîëîãèÿ è ýêîëîãèÿ V.D. Kravchenko1, Th. Witt2, W. Speidel2, J. Mooser3, A. Junnila4 & G.C. Müller4 Â.Ä. Êðàâ÷åíêî1,Ò. Âèòò2, Â. Øïàéäåëü2, Äæ. Ìîçåð3, Ý. Äæàííèëà4 , Ã.Ê. Ìþëëåð4 1 Department of Zoology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. 2 Museum Witt, Tengstr. 33, D-80796 Munich, Germany. 3 Seilerbruecklstr. 23, D-85354 Freising, Germany. 4 Department of Parasitology, Kuvin Centre for the Study of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, The Hebrew University Hadassah- Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel. KEY WORDS: Lepidoptera, Israel, Levant, Nolidae, Eariadinae, Chloephorinae, phenology, ecology, host- plants. ÊËÞ×ÅÂÛÅ ÑËÎÂÀ: Lepidoptera, Èçðàèëü, Ëåâàíò, Nolidae, Eariadinae, Chloephorinae, ôåíîëîãèÿ, ýêîëîãèÿ, êîðìîâûå ðàñòåíèÿ. ABSTRACT: The distribution, flight period and âèä, Microxestis wutzdorffi (Püngeler, 1907), ñîáðàííûé abundance of six Israeli Eariadinae and eight Chloe- 80 ëåò íàçàä, íå îáíàðóæåí çà âðåìÿ ðàáîòû phorinae species (Noctuoidea, Nolidae) are summa- Èçðàèëüñêî-Ãåðìàíñêîãî Ïðîåêòà ïî èçó÷åíèþ Lepi- rized. Seven species are new records for Israel: Earias doptera. Äëÿ âñåõ âèäîâ ïðèâîäÿòñÿ äàííûå ïî biplaga Walker, 1866, Earias cupreoviridis (Walker, ÷èñëåííîñòè, ðàñïðåäåëåíèþ, ôåíîëîãèè è ýêîëîãèè. 1862), Acryophora dentula (Lederer, 1870), Bryophilop- Äëÿ ïÿòè âèäîâ âïåðâûå óêàçàíû êîðìîâûå ðàñòåíèÿ. sis roederi (Standfuss, 1892), Nycteola revayana (Sco- poli, 1772), Nycteola columbana (Turner, 1925) and Nycteola asiatica (Krulikovsky, 1904). Three species, Introduction E. biplaga E. cupreoviridis and N. revayana, are re- corded for the first time from the Levante. Only one The Nolidae is a family that has changed in its species, Microxestis wutzdorffi (Püngeler, 1907), col- coverage several times during the past.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Challenges in Special Nature Reserve “Gornje Podunavlje” and Preparations for Its Proclamation of Biosphere Reserve
    ISSN 0354-8724 (hard copy) | ISSN 1820-7138 (online) Management Challenges in Special Nature Reserve “Gornje Podunavlje” and Preparations for its Proclamation of Biosphere Reserve Vladimir StojanovićA*, Stevan SavićA Received: October 2013 | Revised: December 2013 | Accepted: December 2013 Abstract Management of protected natural wetland habitats and flooded plains is a real challenge in nature pro- tection. Such areas consist mainly of mosaic ecosystems, highly sensitive to all natural changes, espe- cially to those of anthropogenic origin. Special nature reserve “Gornje Podunavlje” is one of the larg- est and most important wetland habitats in this part of Europe. The area is under protection, but for centuries it has been influenced by numerous economic activities. The institutions for nature protec- tion and protected area management face numerous challenges regarding this issue. The paper focus- es on the research of the landscape changes in “Gornje Podunavlje” and its surroundings. They have be- come a sensitive issue under the circumstances when “Gornje Podunavlje” and its broader areas have been nominated for biosphere reserve status. Key words: protected area, landscape changes, “Gornje Podunavlje”, management, biosphere reserve, Mura – Drava – Danube. Introduction ularization of protection through educational activities Since its foundation, Special nature reserve “Gornje and tourism development, which directly needs wild, Podunavlje” has been managed by Public Enterprise pristine and preserved nature. Vojvodinašume in Petrovaradin. Active measures have On the grounds of confronted opinions, it seems been prescribed for this protected area. However, the that all this area is urgently in need for the principle area has been strongly influenced by agriculture, fish- of sustainable development in exploitation of the re- ing, forestry and meliorations for centuries, leaving vis- sources and nature protection.
    [Show full text]