Ftedjumurje I Varažd.Kraj Hrvatsko Zagorje Gornja Posavina Zagreb

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ftedjumurje I Varažd.Kraj Hrvatsko Zagorje Gornja Posavina Zagreb 1-8. STABOVHIŽTVO PREHA DEMOGRAFSKOM REJONU U KOME SIAHUJE Doseljeno iz rejona Ukupno Nije se Beograd MR<va Podrinje Kolubara Bumadij a Podunavlje! "^ . 1 1 SOCIJALISTI<KA FEDERATIVNA UKUPNO 18 549 195 11 664 964 650 69 077 61 879 111 968 104 662 99 750 68 221 SOCIJALISTI<KA REPUBLIKA Uže Beograd 749 329 251 0241 37 161 10 998 4 926 26 845 16 729 22 753 10 998 185 275 122 319' 390 36 33'* 9 131 2 800 159 161 397 Podrinje 1^2 082 110 463 840 2 383 30 845 1 436 100 89 55* folubara 272 961 175 844 195 2 506 3 041 65 937 1 910 702 3 729 umadija 250 675 149 228 207 265 892 2 428 63 717 3 937 518 Podunavlje 281 294 182 990 040 245 271 981 5 685 59 351 539 UŽi=ki kraj 180 490 125 980 060 1 020 793 80 25 7 35 090 Ca=anski kraj 197 464 129 656 609 2 519 2 302 871 1 535 162 3 757 rbar 140 255 86 474 339 74 61 261 1 786 262 635 Hasina 270 506 186 646 418 102 76 23O 587 293 382 Sandžak 215 528 157 837 495 151 80 63 116 44 615 Mlava 263 225 190 995! 282 172 167 381 502 2 964 330 Krajina 127 045 99 956: 844 58 61 116 116 133 67 Timok 187 389 123 003' 279 136 182 239 311 231 238 Pomoravlje 254 521 170 869 i I74 175 132 377 2 922 1 183 468 Niaki kraj 332 856 204 132! 156 187 119 407 739 537 570 Toplica 141 141 96 5411 442 24 24 56 114 98 53 Nižava 145 789 105 494! 496 11 19 81 91 94 53 Jablanics 254 891 183 664 893 52 34 110 197 177 119 Vranjaki kraj 222 520 164 692 I 700 32 68 170 103 87 62 Socijalisti=ka Autonomna Južni Banat '20 187 172 733 6 083 696 060 557 736 1 612 283 Severni Banat 335 681 I92 647 j 3 173 226 175 367 268 319 292 Južna Ba=ka 424 799 204 464 7 714 1 486 689 995 781 579 535 Severna Ba=ka 272 899 179 735 1 934 124 140 210 217 213 179 Zapadna Ba=ka 255 561 128 O32 1 736 216 275 399 403 157 246 0J8 129 538 ' 6 887 5 040 861 376 388 575 Socijalisti=ka Autonoiana Kosovo 345 404 238 590 i 850 69 45 224 203 90 111 Zve<an 159 725 107 235[ 373 39 16 65 130 49 52 S ar oki kraj 256 442 190 645 380 24 16 3* 67 42 44 Metohija 202 390 142 087 310 14 13 53 103 24 71 SOCIJALISTI<KA REPUBLIKA Jugoisto=na Slavonija 255 777 124 379 1 053 167 338 94 62 75 63 SevemoiBto<na Slavonija 240 141 10? 664 1 432 163 85 131 106 106 116 Podravska Slavonija 212 472 123 293 541 90 55 74 43 82 24 Posavska Slavonija 265 520 150 891 i 823 67 57 81 66 H8 65 Bilogora 277 274 165 744 j 314 17 26 «3 27 54 34 ftedjumurje i Varažd.kraj 247 136 178 855 I 519 13 24 22 22 28 21 Hrvatsko Zagorje 214 110 173 199 i 55 11 6 6 5 1 5 Gornja Posavina 2« 538 140 029 I 495 41 22 40 47 95 40 Zagreb V/O 220 253 252 I 6 173 221 88 273 331 257 173 Pokuplje i Banija 255 618 175 289 '• 641 75 35 59 43 35 35 Gorski Kotar i Lika 221 353 163 380 i 405 22 4 70 61 31 19 Hrvatsko primorje 217 426 110 642 ! 2 47Q 73 42 69 101 140 53 176 838 96 237 \ 814 127 38 68 98 48 57 Dalmatinska Zagora 265 028 218 910 301 28 10 21 46 21 25 Severna Dalmacija 183 809 134 527 14 61 ! 725 45 58 53 51 Južna Dalmacija 316 434 202 396 1 799 130 49 58 82 123 117 SOCIJALISTI<KA REPUBLIKA Ljubljana 227 161 105 416 2 053 52 25 88 133 43 68 Slovensko primor. in Notr 200 231 108 886 369 41 4 32 32 21 20 Gorenjska 236 314 128 106 463 34 9 38 46 33 33 Korosko-štajerski kraj 252 851 116 132 674 31 25 50 111 62 33 Podravsko-pomurski kraj 227 767 138 I34 151 4 10 14 12 11 17 Zasavsko-aavinjski kraj 240 413 125 161 365 29 7 15 50 23 24 Dolenjska 206 791 114 950 289 22 12 27 49 25 15 SOCIJALISTI<KA REPUBLIKA Grme=" 194 852 148 326 i 302 52 14 25 24 12 7 Kozara 250 078 189 064 i 342 26 8 33 50 26 13 Jaja=ki kraj 150 397 113 998 168 18 8 98 52 16 20 Banjalu=ki kraj 207 584 154 651 ! 873 73 37 106 146 75 49 Ozrenoki kraj 182 854 142 789 226 76 23 42 20 26 7 Srednja Posavina 178 115 141 865 ! 168 51 8 29 21 42 19 bkrina 175 184 136 940 ! 162 56 7 15 28 19 32 Sembe.-ija 200 766 155 012 : 335 278 163 82 46 24 50 Majevica 231 865 167 342 i 943 199 152 159 72 36 114 Zeni=ki kraj 221 254 148 273 i 459 114 46 75 69 97 81 Viso=ki kraj 181 924 121 127 j 366 228 58 57 225 47 92 Sarajevo 213 101 96 363 j O54 429 177 379 532 267 423 Bir=anski kraj 195 802 150 249 242 179 030 128 19 39 467 Sutjeska 213 513 147 551 1 223 52 99 109 50 26 636 Trebinje 168 317 122 209 ! 217 34 9 27 21 12 23 Neretva 181 588 129 801 i 726 24 29 55 73 34 Livanjski kraj 130 744 104 699 ! 71 8 6 4 10 2 SOCIJALISTI<KA REPUBLIKA Pelaponija 235 382 156 872 i 396 25 9 47 106 47 88 Kumanovski kraj 148 064 102 899 ; 221 19 11 27 29 33 17 Ohridski kraj 187 088 142 887 ! 464 8 6 30 33 31 15 Skoplje 270 299 135 556 486 110 50 405 162 118 ( 197 Stipski kraj 253 601 176 212 172 19 11 48 30 7 14 Tetovßki kraj 17? 826 127 338 307 14 5 14 30 30 10 Povardarje 137 743 83 740 i 124 5 9 43 27 23 40 SOCIJALISTI<KA REPUBLIKA Severna Crna Goi-a 275 387 187 593 657 44 13 81 87 128 124 Crnogorsko primorje ea zaledjem 196 507 120 623 1 551 55 24 116 98 48 90 T7*TžTehni=kih razloga, zbog redosleda rajona pri izradi tabela, zadržan Je i redoaled republika koji Je važio pre donošenja Ustava SFRJ od 1963. godine. 52 I DEMOGRAFSKIM REJ0HD1A IZ KOJIH SE DOSELILO v Doseljeno iz reJona 3'omorav- Hiški =a=anski Rasina Sandžak Krajina Timok kraj Ibar lje kraj 1 REPUBLIKA JUGOSLAVIJA 72 622 51 034 102 062 65 969 74 ?89 31 485 57 145 87 030 119 906 SEBI JA podru=je 12 564 5 067 10 107 3 415 8 186 3 565 5 535 10 626 13 799 19» 116 116 66 94 35 125 131 372 186 74 96 99 30} 27 79 71 109 1 301 265 454 376 112 277 380 3 293 2 405 793 571 133 456 4 755 58 590 406 823S 338 2 992 321 448 1 784 780 169 4 25 71 13 12 11 303 11 'tO 102 943 340 944 129 22 150 288 217 4 076 30 704 3 521 1 985 186 106 241 489 571 644 2 373 63 398 184 179 73 300 2 950 2 588 710 968 72 39 189 57 17 25 194 194 398 249 455 107 50 509 867 613 1 828 669 83 64 122 65 905 18 049 2 187 234 544 214 239 626 67 809 3 790 35 626 824 4 4J7 372 604 5 377 177 1 732 226 1 248 53 4J4 1 23O 511 541 3 291 144 495 517 3 075 1 262 73 770 152 106 1 645 104 69 39 139 123 2 915 52 62 151 38 90 121 985 129 1 359 84 107 206 83 159 97 233 288 2 781 83 61 160 68 94 121 186 249 759 Pokrajina VOJTO ' 1 528 903 2 678 3 007 2 516 693 829 8}9 1 115 249 217 542 122 25O 235 187 302 442 729 436 1 264 220 616 546 530 797 1 O32 142 111 135 49 109 38 137 146 254 146 191 269 139 318 273 314 448 1 143 356 225 584 307 287 132 308 42J 587 Pokrajina Koeov 174 253 961 375 92 72 212 171 681 78 830 688 1 364 59 40 67 96 240 49 88 88 217 20 18 47 80 137 53 72 384 519 49 7 69 46 144 HRVATSKA 46 49 45 43 41 24 64 115 98 59 47 76 42 100 61 103 161 149 19 19 84 16 79 65 53 84 55 16 33 63 16 42 28 70 94 75 23 31 38 18 27 11 31 77 64 30 11 23 4 15 13 7 35 32 4 2 5 1 4 4 9 12 18 19 8 29 12 32 54 23 38 44 245 323 208 99 118 46 161 260 497 36 38 53 19 49 16 36 65 61 43 43 6 17 3 19 36 44 92 S 59 28 105 34 62 104 120 50 63 66 20 82 27 55 88 122 20 19 15 5 22 4 21 41 22 39 46 35 13 49 9 56 196 78 112 45 71 61 106 40 92 57 153 SLOVESI JA 69 43 67 20 72 101 91 47 165 20 21 39 9 39 10 15 49 45 19 20 54 11 23 14 43 43 87 43 46 50 27 59 26 71 69 94 12 11 6 12 8 5 11 21 15 15 15 34 10 45 29 162 132 81 20 36 26 8 36 3 46 58 47 BOSHA I HEHCEGC VIHA 20 17 18 14 26 6 15 24 19 34 14 24 14 23 14 24 19 17 7 22 14 21 3 12 35 72 41 66 40 59 48 56 104 141 30 12 30 9 5 1 14 26 10 26 6 18 15 14 12 12 10 17 17 9 12 51 9 12 7 17 16 40 24 19 204 64 14 39 51 53 54 32 54 109 59 22 50 83 103 61 51 36 62 86 25 37 62 73 119 40 51 159 34 34 64 47 423 1 367 137 53 108 159 350 34 >g "S 39 15 8 29 29 10 156 53 45 772 17 3 12 16 41 20 6 19 23 40 2 31 16 28 105 62 52 54 88 23 40 44 91 7 2 2 10 1 5 12 6 MAKEDOHIJA 35 86 1 250 32 36 44 182 18 B 47 22 54 IS 76 30 14« 27 18 54 27 14 24 35 68 ?• 213 334 361 1 999 122 93 273 294 1 659 19 25 62 80 31 11 42 42 94 17 14 35 165 18 32 2« 30 70 36 45 40 1 184 26 22 112 40 99 ORNA GOBA 95 101 56 2 937 83 36 ti 45 80 96 72 84 159 71 24 73 72 175 53 1-8.
Recommended publications
  • WWF Adria Implements the Project: Protected Areas for Nature And
    Protected Areas for Nature and People – NP Durmitor, Montenegro © Martin Šolar, WWF Adria FACTSHEET 2016 WWF ADRIA IMPLEMENTS THE PROJECT: Protected Areas for Project Title: Nature and People Protected Areas for Nature and People, PA4NP The purpose of the project “Protected Areas for Nature and People”, implemented by WWF Adria since October 2015, is sustainable use of natural resources in the Region: Albania, Bosnia Dinaric Arc region as a foundation for the socio-economic development. To that and Herzegovina, Croatia, end, WWF, together with its partners, will strive to achieve the following targets: Kosovo*, Macedonia, • To introduce examples of how protected areas can generate social Montenegro, Slovenia and economic benefits in cooperation with the local community, and Serbia • To improve cooperation between the protected areas Duration: and the local community in the entire region, October 2015 – • To enhance cooperation between WWF and its partners on the one October 2019 side and decision-makers and those who have impact on them on the other side at the national level. Donor and Value: Swedish International Development WWF will use the examples of socio-economic benefits of well-managed parks, as Cooperation Agency (Sida), well as argumentation and information required for decision-making to encourage 4,200,000 EUR decision-makers from 8 countries in the region to deliver on their promises made under the “Big Win for Dinaric Arc”, a document they adopted in 2013. This is WWF’s contribution with the aim of achieving the targets
    [Show full text]
  • UNDP SRB PA.Pdf
    TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I: SITUATION ANALYSIS .................................................................................................... 4 1.1. Context, global significance, environmental, institutional and policy background ........ 4 1.2 Threats and root-causes ....................................................................................................... 7 1.3 Desired long-term vision and barriers to achieving it ....................................................... 7 1.4 Stakeholder analysis ............................................................................................................. 9 1.5 Baseline analysis .................................................................................................................. 10 PART II: STRATEGY ...................................................................................................................... 13 2.1 Project Rationale and Conformity to GEF Policies and Strategic Objectives .............. 13 2.2 Country Ownership: Country Eligibility and Country Drivenness ............................... 13 2.3 Design principles and strategic considerations ................................................................ 14 2.4 Project Objective, Outcomes and Outputs/Activities ...................................................... 15 2.5 Financial modality .............................................................................................................. 22 2.6 Indicators, Risks and Assumptions ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina Joint Opinion on the Legal
    Strasbourg, Warsaw, 9 December 2019 CDL-AD(2019)026 Opinion No. 951/2019 Or. Engl. ODIHR Opinion Nr.:FoA-BiH/360/2019 EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) OSCE OFFICE FOR DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS AND HUMAN RIGHTS (OSCE/ODIHR) BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA JOINT OPINION ON THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK GOVERNING THE FREEDOM OF PEACEFUL ASSEMBLY IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA, IN ITS TWO ENTITIES AND IN BRČKO DISTRICT Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 121st Plenary Session (Venice, 6-7 December 2019) On the basis of comments by Ms Claire BAZY-MALAURIE (Member, France) Mr Paolo CAROZZA (Member, United States of America) Mr Nicolae ESANU (Substitute member, Moldova) Mr Jean-Claude SCHOLSEM (substitute member, Belgium) This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-AD(2019)026 - 2 - Table of Contents I. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 3 II. Background and Scope of the Opinion ...................................................................... 4 III. International Standards .............................................................................................. 5 IV. Legal context and legislative competence .................................................................. 6 V. Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 8 A. Definitions of public assembly ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (Microsoft Powerpoint
    Bosnia and Herzegowina with Koch International Terminal Departure on via SI-Ljubljana TUE FR Posavina PLZ 76 Una Sana Republika Srpska Regular delivery time: PLZ 77,79 PLZ 78 Tuzla 5-6 working days PLZ 74,75 till terminal SI-Ljubljana Zenica- Doboj Delivery to consignee upon request, PLZ 72,74 depending on clarification of Zentralbosnien Bosnisches Herceg PLZ 70,72 Podrinje Bosna Sarajevo PLZ 73 customs formalities. PLZ 80 Herzegowina Neretva • You can find descriptions of the products and the general terms and conditions at: www.koch-international.de/en/service/download- area/ West Herzegowina Daily rate requests PLZ 80,88 [email protected] Dispatch / Order to [email protected] Croatia with Koch International Terminal at Departure on via SI-Ljubljana TUE FR Medimurje PLZ 40 Krapina- Varazdin Koprivnica- Zagorje PLZ 42 Krizevci PLZ 49 PLZ 48 Zagreb Bjelovar- Virovitica- Regular delivery time: Zagreb Stadt Bilogora Podravina PLZ 10 5-7 working days PLZ 43 PLZ 33 Osijek-Baranja Primorje- Pozega-Slawonien PLZ 31 Gorski Kotar Sisak-Moslavina PLZ 34 Booking options Istrien PLZ 51 Karlovac PLZ 44 Vukovar- PLZ 52 PLZ 47 Srijem Brod-Posavina PLZ 32 PLZ 35 Lika-Senj PLZ53 5-6 days Zadar PLZ 23 5-6 days Silbenik- Knin 6-7 days PLZ 22 • You can find descriptions of the products and the general terms Split- and conditions at: www.koch-international.de/en/service/download- Dalmatien area/ Daily rate requests Dubrovnik-Neretva [email protected] PLZ 20 Dispatch / Order to [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Assessement of Mlava River Based on Aquatic Macroinvertebrates
    VII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE “WATER & FISH” - ZBORNIK PREDAVANJA 439 WATER QUALITY ASSESSEMENT OF MLAVA RIVER BASED ON AQUATIC MACROINVERTEBRATES NATAŠA POPOVIĆ, VANJA MARKOVIĆ, JELENA TOMOVIĆ, JELENA ĐUKNIĆ, BOJANA TUBIĆ, NIKOLA MARINKOVIĆ, JELENA ČANAK-ATLAGIĆ, MOMIR PAUNOVIĆ University of Belgrade, Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”, Belgrade ANALIZA KVALITETA VODE REKE MLAVE NA OSNOVU VODENIH MAKROINVERTEBRATA Apstrakt Cilj rada je da se predstave rezultati ispitivanja kvaliteta vode reke Mlave, zasnovani na prisutnoj zajednici vodenih makroinvertebrata. Mlava, sa dužinom toka od 78 km i po- vršinom sliva od 1885 km², jedna je od značajnijih pritoka Dunava u Srbiji. Kao najvažniji izvori komunalnog i industrijskog zagađenja mogu se izdvojiti gradovi Požarevac (70000 stanovnika; u donjem toku) i Petrovac na Mlavi (8000 stanovnika; srednji tok), kao i Žagu- bica (2600 stanovnika; gornji tok). Slivno područje, naročito u srednjem delu toka, je i pod uticajem spiranja sa poljoprivrednih površina, kao i komunalnih otpadnih voda iz brojnih manjih naselja. Negativni efekti, ovih antropogenih uticaja mogu biti još izraženiji, zbog specifične hi- drologije, odnosno preovlađivanja stanja niskih voda u slivu ove reke. Uzorkovanje je iz- vršeno u julu 2013. godine. Kao parametri za ocenu kvaliteta vode, korišćeni su sledeći pokazatelji: Saprobni indeks (SI; Zelinka & Marvan), BMWP i ASPT skorovi, broj taksona grupa Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera (EPT) i indeks diverziteta (SWI; Sha- nnon-Wiener’s indeks). Ukupno 72 taksona makroinvertebrata su identifikovana. Insekti su bili najraznovrsnija komponenta, a u okviru njih najbrojnije su bile grupe Ephemeroptera (13 taksona) i Trichoptera (11 taksona). Najveća raznovrsnost zabeležena je na lokalitetu Le- skovac (33 taksona). Većina taksona je tolerantna na određeni stepen organskog zagađenja (β –mezosaprobni i α–mezosaprobni organizmi), naročito u donjem delu toka (Rašanac i Požarevac).
    [Show full text]
  • SERBIE G R I E (Plus De 1 100 000 Hab.) O N SZEGED H MAKÓ V
    vers BUDAPEST 20° vers BÉKÉSCSABA vers BUDAPEST vers ORADEA 22° 21° vers BUCAREST Capitale d'État SERBIE G R I E (plus de 1 100 000 hab.) O N SZEGED H MAKÓ v. BUDAPEST 19° NADLAC ARAD Plus de 200 000 hab. E PÉCS B Plus de 100 000 hab. ) SÂNNICOLAU MARE Mures U A N Kanjiza A N 46° D U Subotica Novi R LIPOVA Plus de 50 000 hab. D vers CRAIOVA ( nca Knezevac ra A 46° MOHÁCS BAČKA DU NORD K B A N A T r Coka O Plus de 25 000 hab. i B A Č K A v a a ic j Senta t a a D E L ’ O U E S T l D U N O R D Z Plus de 10 000 hab. Bačka Topola Kikinda U BELI MANASTIR Ada (SEVERNI JIMBOLIA vers VARAZDIN Sombor (SEVERNA BAČKA) Autre ville ou localité I I BANAT) I a DRA I g V I Mali Idos TIMISOARA e M E I B I V I e Crvenka ( li I k Nova D i I VOÏVODINE I Pirot Chef-lieu d'okrug (district) R k I Crnja A I a (province autonome) Apatin n Kula s I LUGOS V a I i j A I l I m ) M e i (Z A P A D N A I Becej Novi Becej l T OSIJEK I I I g a I a I I e n A Autoroute a l I I I B k i CRAIOVA B A Č K A) I I I i I I I I Vrbas I I I r I i T ta k k I S s a I I j vers I e n S g Srbobran B A I N A T a A e Route principale I CRUCENI l B Odzaci I BAČKAI DU SUD C R O A T I E GATAIA I Bîrza v a Zitiste N I s i V I u D Temerin ka Backi A Bac m Route secondaire N I C E N T R A L a DETA ( I D Petrovac U I T U B I I N Zabali Boka E I I Secanj VINKOVCI A I I I V Zrenjanin Autre route VUKOVAR I ) Novi Sad I I (SREDNJI BANAT) I I vers ZAGREB I I I I JAMU (JUŽNI BAČKA) I Backa Palanka Plandiste Futog K I MARE Titel a I Voie ferrée n I B a l I o sut Beocin D I u E I 641 vers CRAIOVA n D a
    [Show full text]
  • THE POSAVINA BORDER REGION of CROATIA and BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA: DEVELOPMENT up to 1918 (With Special Reference to Changes in Ethnic Composition)
    THE POSAVINA BORDER REGION OF CROATIA AND BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA: DEVELOPMENT UP TO 1918 (with special reference to changes in ethnic composition) Ivan CRKVEN^I] Zagreb UDK: 94(497.5-3 Posavina)''15/19'':323.1 Izvorni znanstveni rad Primljeno: 9. 9. 2003. After dealing with the natural features and social importance of the Posavina region in the past, presented is the importance of this region as a unique Croatian ethnic territory during the Mid- dle Ages. With the appearance of the Ottomans and especially at the beginning of the 16th century, great ethnic changes oc- cured, primarily due to the expulsion of Croats and arrival of new ethnic groups, mostly Orthodox Vlachs and later Muslims and ethnic Serbs. With the withdrawal of the Ottomans from the Pannonian basin to the areas south of the Sava River and the Danube, the Sava becomes the dividing line creating in its border areas two socially and politically different environments: the Slavonian Military Frontier on the Slavonian side and the Otto- man military-frontier system of kapitanates on the Bosnian side. Both systems had a special influence on the change of ethnic composition in this region. With the withdrawal of the Ottomans further towards the southeast of Europe and the Austrian occu- pation of Bosnia and Herzegovina the Sava River remains the border along which, especially on the Bosnian side, further changes of ethnic structure occured. Ivan Crkven~i}, Ilo~ka 34, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia. E-mail: [email protected] INTRODUCTION The research subject in this work is the border region Posavi- na between the Republic of Croatia and the Republic Bosnia- 293 -Herzegovina.
    [Show full text]
  • The PE EPS Environmental Report for 2015
    Environmental Protection Electric Power Industry of Serbia 2015 Environmental Report Belgrade, April 2016 PE Electric Power Industry of Serbia Environmental Protection INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................................................................................6 1. COAL AND ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................7 1.1 PE EPS COAL PRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................................7 1.2 PE EPS ELECTRICITY GENERATION ........................................................................................................................................7 1.3 FUEL CONSUMPTION AND HAZARDOUS AND HARMFUL SUBSTANCES AIR EMISSION FROM PE EPS TPPS ..................................8 1.4 PE EPS WORK INJURIES ......................................................................................................................................................10 1.5 PE EPS HEALTH ..................................................................................................................................................................10 2. KOLUBARA MINING BASIN BRANCH ......................................................................................................................................12 A KOLUBARA MB – OPEN CAST MINES
    [Show full text]
  • Подкласс Exogenia Collin, 1912
    Research Article ISSN 2336-9744 (online) | ISSN 2337-0173 (print) The journal is available on line at www.ecol-mne.com Contribution to the knowledge of distribution of Colubrid snakes in Serbia LJILJANA TOMOVIĆ1,2,4*, ALEKSANDAR UROŠEVIĆ2,4, RASTKO AJTIĆ3,4, IMRE KRIZMANIĆ1, ALEKSANDAR SIMOVIĆ4, NENAD LABUS5, DANKO JOVIĆ6, MILIVOJ KRSTIĆ4, SONJA ĐORĐEVIĆ1,4, MARKO ANĐELKOVIĆ2,4, ANA GOLUBOVIĆ1,4 & GEORG DŽUKIĆ2 1 University of Belgrade, Faculty of Biology, Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 2 University of Belgrade, Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 3 Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia, Dr Ivana Ribara 91, 11070 Belgrade, Serbia 4 Serbian Herpetological Society “Milutin Radovanović”, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 5 University of Priština, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Biology Department, Lole Ribara 29, 38220 Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia 6 Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia, Vožda Karađorđa 14, 18000 Niš, Serbia *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] Received 28 March 2015 │ Accepted 31 March 2015 │ Published online 6 April 2015. Abstract Detailed distribution pattern of colubrid snakes in Serbia is still inadequately described, despite the long historical study. In this paper, we provide accurate distribution of seven species, with previously published and newly accumulated faunistic records compiled. Comparative analysis of faunas among all Balkan countries showed that Serbian colubrid fauna is among the most distinct (together with faunas of Slovenia and Romania), due to small number of species. Zoogeographic analysis showed high chorotype diversity of Serbian colubrids: seven species belong to six chorotypes. South-eastern Serbia (Pčinja River valley) is characterized by the presence of all colubrid species inhabiting our country, and deserves the highest conservation status at the national level.
    [Show full text]
  • Decision on Prosecution's Motion for Admission of Evidence from the Bar Table
    IT-03-67-T 14/46371BIS D14 - 1II46371BIS UNITED 04 March 2010 MC NATIONS International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Case No.: IT -03-67 -T Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed Date: 19 February 2010 in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since 1991 ENGLISH • Original: French IN TRIAL CHAMBER III Before: Judge Jean-Claude Antonetti, Presiding Judge Frederik HarhotT Judge Flavia Lattanzi Registrar: Mr John Hocking Decision of: 19 February 2010 THE PROSECUTOR v. VOJISLA V SESELJ PUBLIC DOCUMENT WITH ANNEX DECISION ON PROSECUTION'S MOTION FOR ADMISSION OF EVIDENCE FROM THE BAR TABLE The Office of the Prosecutor Mr Mathias Marcussen The Accused Mr Vojislav Seselj PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/8bff65/ 13/46371BIS 1. Trial Chamber III ("Chamber") of the International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the former Yugoslavia since 1991 ("Tribunal") is seized of a motion filed by the Office of the Prosecutor ("Prosecution") on 26 February 2009 for the admission, pursuant to Rule 89(C) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence ("Rules"), of evidence from the bar table ("Motion"). 1 I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 2. On 26 February 2009, the Prosecution submitted a Motion for the admission in the present case of 142 documents listed in Annex A to the Motion ("Annex A"). Furthermore, it sought leave to exceed the word limit. 2 3. The Accused did not file a response to this Motion within fourteen days ofthe day he received the version thereof in BCS, a time-limit granted to him under Rule l26bis of the Rules.
    [Show full text]
  • Or Less Sustainable? Assessment from a Policy Perspective
    sustainability Review More or Less Sustainable? Assessment from a Policy Perspective Biljana Petrevska 1,* , Aleksandra Terzi´c 2 and Cvetko Andreeski 3 1 Faculty of Tourism and Business Logistics, Goce DelˇcevUniversity, 2000 Štip, Macedonia 2 Geographical Institute Jovan Cviji´c,SASA, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; [email protected] 3 Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality—Ohrid, St. Kliment Ohridski University, 7000 Bitola, Macedonia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 29 March 2020; Accepted: 17 April 2020; Published: 24 April 2020 Abstract: Sustainability of tourism destinations has become the main focus in planning and managing tourism development. Despite existing legislation and an institutional framework to safeguard balanced tourism growth, many destinations fail to properly address it. So far, studies are limited in exploring sustainable tourism impacts from a policy perspective. This study follows previous ones in using the triple bottom line sustainability approach to define tourism impacts. It argues, in particular, for a nexus between understanding of policy perception and sustainability, and it applies this to tourist destinations in Serbia to determine whether they are operating sustainably. For this purpose, the data were collected using a combination of multiple methods, involving interviews with policymakers and content analysis of strategic documents. This study further suggests a model that assesses the extent of the sustainability of tourist destinations. The results illustrate the importance of understanding policy perceptions in shaping and facilitating sustainability and informing policy enablers on how to improve and reform current tourism development. The model can be adopted and applied to any tourist destination facing an inevitable need to re-shape their tourism development plans and policies, while the implications address the need to build a participative policy approach to sustainable tourism development.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Redacted Version of Prosecution Final Trial Brief
    IT-03-69-T 48575 D48575 - D48137 01 March 2013 MB UNITED NATIONS International Tribunal for the Case No.: IT-03-69-T Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of Date: 28 February 2013 International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the former Yugoslavia since 1991 IN TRIAL CHAMBER I Before: Judge Alphons Orie, Presiding Judge Michèle Picard Judge Elizabeth Gwaunza Registrar: Mr. John Hocking THE PROSECUTOR v. JOVICA STANIŠIĆ and FRANKO SIMATOVIĆ Public with Public Annexes A-E P U B L I C R E D A C T E D V E R S I O N O F P ROSECUTION F I N A L T R I A L B RIEF The Office of the Prosecutor: Mr. Dermot Groome Ms. Maxine Marcus Mr. Travis Farr Ms. Rachel Friedman Ms. Grace Harbour Mr. Adam Weber Mr. Kyle Wood Counsel for Jovica Stani{i}: Mr. Wayne Jordash Mr. Scott Martin Counsel for Franko Simatovi}: Mr. Mihajlo Bakrač Mr. Vladimir Petrovi} 48574 THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA IT-03-69-T THE PROSECUTOR v. JOVICA STANIŠIĆ and FRANKO SIMATOVIĆ Public with Public Annexes A-E P U B L I C R E D A C T E D V E R S I O N O F P ROSECUTION F I N A L T R I A L B RIEF On 14 December 2012 the Prosecution filed its Final Trial Brief and five annexes ∗ confidentially. The following is a public redacted copy of this filing. Pursuant to Rule 86 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence the Prosecution submits its Final Trial Brief with the following Annexes: i.
    [Show full text]