DOCSLIB.ORG

10PF3-Religious Issues.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
10PF3-Religious Issues.Pdf 2010/2011 Public Forum Topic Analysis Resolved: High school Public Forum Debate resolutions should not confront sensitive religious issues. Writers & Contributors John Lewis, Sean Mumper, Todd Rainey, Sarah Spiker, Christian Tarsney Editor: Glenn Prince Managing Editor: Mike Bietz Publisher: Victor Jih 10PF3-Religious Issues Page 1 of 112 www.victorybriefs.com Table of Contents Table of Contents 1 TOPIC ANALYSIS BY JOHN LEWIS 2 TOPIC ANALYSIS BY SEAN MUMPER 16 TOPIC ANALYSIS BY TODD RAINEY 24 TOPIC ANALYSIS BY SARAH SPIKER-RAINEY 38 TOPIC ANALYSIS BY CHRISTIAN TARSNEY 48 GENERAL EVIDENCE 67 PRO EVIDENCE 72 CON EVIDENCE 90 10PF3-Religious Issues Page 2 of 112 www.victorybriefs.com TOPIC ANALYSIS BY JOHN LEWIS Resolved: High school Public Forum Debate resolutions should not confront sensitive religious issues. It might seem paradoxical to debate a topic about confronting sensitive religious issues when discussing that topic requires the confrontation of sensitive religious issues. Nevertheless, prepare for the meta-debate, or the debate over debate. This topic will force Public Forum debaters to consider what their event should look like: what sort of issues they would like to discuss, how those issues should be discussed, and ultimately, what the purpose of debate is in the first place. Instead of sitting on the sidelines while their coaches determine the course of Public Forum, this topic puts control of the event directly in the hands of the debaters. Along the way, debaters will discuss issues like educational policy, the separation of church and state, the treatment of religion in a pluralistic society, and the enduring importance of religion to modern life, for better or worse. Suffice to say that thereʼs a bit more meat to chew on with this topic than people have given it credit for. To understand this topic, itʼs important to know why weʼre debating it in the first place. Iʼll start by explaining the controversy over the initial November topic—regarding the Islamic community center near Ground Zero—and what it means for debaters on this topic. Iʼll address some of the concerns that this topic is “too LD” or “too policy” by claiming that arguments are arguments, and that this topic really strikes at the heart of public forum debate. Then Iʼll delve directly into the topic by discussing what it means, and accordingly, what sort of arguments the PRO and CON should be making. The importance of making arguments on this topic should not be understated; the fact that academics and intellectuals donʼt discuss this topic directly means that debaters must 10PF3-Religious Issues Page 3 of 112 www.victorybriefs.com “do their own work” and rely on logic and critical thinking rather than the opinions of others. Letʼs get started. Whatʼs all the fuss about? Anyone who watches cable news or reads Sarah Palinʼs twitter feed (guilty on both counts) should know that the construction of an Islamic community center several blocks from Ground Zero has possessed this country for several months now. The “Park51” project, originally named the Cordoba House, was spearheaded by Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf under the auspices of the Cordoba Initiative, and was set to include space for religious and secular activity, akin to a YMCA. Of course, Ground Zero has a special significance in the American psyche for what happened there on September 11, 2001. For that reason, the National Forensic League decided to put the issue in the form of a topic, and the original November topic read: “Resolved: An Islamic community center should be built near Ground Zero.” The topic asked whether or not the center should be built to sidestep the constitutional question of whether or not the builders had the constitutional right to build the center. Most will agree that the builders unquestionably have that right via the first amendment. Thus, the PRO would have to argue that building the community center would promote religious tolerance and a dialogue between faiths, that religious minorities should feel free to exercise their rights in a context of popular resistance, and that Muslims should not be held collectively responsible for 9/11. The CON would have to argue respect for the victims of the 9/11 attacks and the emotions of the country as a whole, that the center would inflame religious bigotry and conflict, and potentially engage the nature of Islam itself. Therein rests the problem. The topic immediately incited strong criticism. Opponents argued that the CON would be forced to make arguments that were essentially bigoted and attributed responsibility 10PF3-Religious Issues Page 4 of 112 www.victorybriefs.com for the 9/11 attacks to Muslims as a whole, and that arguing against the center sent the message that religious minorities should not exercise their rights under popular opposition. Even if debaters engaged the topic in a respectful fashion, which wouldnʼt necessarily be the case, the very nature of the CONʼs position was offensive. Moreover, opponents claimed that it put Muslim students in the uncomfortable position of being singled out by the topic and forced to argue against their religion. Administrators and parents might pull their students out of the activity even if the students wanted to debate the topic. Still others argued that the topic was irrelevant, a fictional controversy ginned up by Republican extremists to win votes. Supporters of the topic argued in response that it was unfair and elitist to reject a topic that many Americans have been fervently discussing, and that the CONʼs position was not necessarily bigoted in nature. For proponents, this topic presented a chance to teach debaters how to respectfully engage…a “sensitive religious issue” with arguments and respect. In any case, the NFL pulled the topic within 48 hours, and gave us the new topic to allow us all to debate the topic ourselves in round. Understanding the Islamic community center topic, and forming your own arguments for why that topic should or should not have been debated, will be critical to debating well on the new topic. The topic provides the clearest and most recent example of a topic that engaged a sensitive religious issue and what that would entail. Rather than being forced to deal in vague abstractions, debaters have a concrete example to dig into. In fact, I bet that many PRO and CON teams will use the Islamic community center topic in round as a sort of “plan” or example that tests whether or not we should discuss sensitive religious issues. If you want to read more about the debate over the topic, the comments here: http://blog.pfdebate.com/2010/10/02/november-2010-nfl-topic-changed/ and here: http://blog.pfdebate.com/2010/10/01/november-2010-topic-announced/ as well as on the LD forums here: http://forum.lddebate.org/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=1200 can be particularly informative. Of course, all of this demonstrates one simple fact: that this topic is the most current of current events, and holds deep significance for debaters in Public Forum and elsewhere. 10PF3-Religious Issues Page 5 of 112 www.victorybriefs.com How is this relevant to Public Forum debate? Iʼve already answered this question by demonstrating that this topic forces debaters to discuss current events ripped directly from the headlines, which any Public Forum debater should feel comfortable doing. However, if you donʼt believe me, Iʼll explain how I see Public Forum debate by going back to the original purpose of the activity—which should give you some hints on how you should go about debating the nature of Public Forum. Critics of this topic have complained that they would rather debate about real- world issues than debate over debate. Others have said that this topic forces debaters to consider ethical issues more suited for LD, or “theory” issues more suited for Policy. Let me encourage you to get away from these shallow perspectives. This topic doesnʼt force you to grapple with questions like the nature of “justice” or “morality.” Nor would you find any “religious discussion bad” theory in a Policy theory file. Neither LD nor policy debaters have discussed anything like this topic. However, you might try asking the LDʼers and Policy debaters you know for their opinions: they might be able to offer some tips on how to go about debating issues that involve ethical questions (as religious issues always do) or issues of what the activity of debate should look like. Remember, arguments are arguments, and the best debaters on this topic will be able to pull together a lot of different perspectives to form cogent arguments. Similarly, youʼre going to have to reach out beyond the normal research you might do for Public Forum. Itʼs going to be hard to do a Google News search and find some easy statistics on sensitive religious issues. Youʼll notice that a lot of the evidence in this brief is cut from law reviews and education journals. This is because there is a not-so- surprisingly robust literature surrounding the place of religion in schools and the place of religion in our society, with advocates on both sides. You should read these opinions and think about how the arguments that theyʼre making could be applied to this topic. For instance, an author might claim that religion is based on faith, rather than reason, and that faith cannot be questioned. If thatʼs true, then how could we debate religious 10PF3-Religious Issues Page 6 of 112 www.victorybriefs.com issues which hinge on a personʼs faith? Or someone might argue that tons of real-world controversies involve religious beliefs (such as abortion, gay marriage, etc) and that we canʼt just ignore the role of religion.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Power of Muslim-Jewish Musical Bridges
    May 27, 2015 The Power of Muslim-Jewish Musical Bridges By Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf Last Thursday, our organization, The Cordoba Initiative, had the unique opportunity to co- sponsor with The Brotherhood Synagogue a special interfaith event which was led by the world famous Farid Ayaz and the Abu Muhammad Qawwals and the popular Jewish folk singer Basya Schechter. In contrast to the global media’s nearly exclusive coverage of conflict between Muslims and Jews, it was so refreshing to sit in The Brotherhood’s beautiful chapel alongside Rabbi Daniel Adler and Cantor Michael Weis and be part of this transformative event where Muslims and Jews came together to celebrate their musical heritages. As a universal language, music has a unique ability to gather and unite people. Since tunes and lyrics can directly tap into our hearts, music is often the most powerful vehicle for spiritual communication. In fact, both Islam and Judaism assign music a central role in spiritual devotion. Islamic Sufism and Jewish Hassidism both emphasize the importance of music and music is central to Islamic and Jewish lifecycle events. Aside from the distinctive music of the adhan (the Muslim call to prayer) and the Torah reading, both Islamic and Jewish births, weddings, and funerals are known for their special liturgical music. Over two hundred Jews, Sunni and Shia Muslims, Sikhs, Hindus and Christians came together at our event “Qawwali and the Spiritual Alchemy of Music” to celebrate the role of music in spiritual devotion and interfaith dialogue. Our overall message was of Divine love and love of our common humanity.
    [Show full text]
  • 4338 Reason Int CC.Indd
    “For my whole Christian life I’ve been saying, ‘My heart cannot rejoice in what my mind rejects.’ Today’s New Atheists seem to be saying something like that: that we should only believe what’s within the bounds of evidence and sound reason. For them, that means we should choose atheism, but in reality nothing could be further from the truth. True Reason explains clearly and deeply how New Atheists have both missed and misunderstood the evidence that exists, and why Christianity is by far the better choice for the thinking mind and worship- ing heart.” —Josh McDowell, Author and Speaker “With a clear message and respectful tone, True Reason challenges and con- vincingly refutes the claim of the New Atheists to own reason. The contribu- tors persuasively argue from history, science, and philosophy that the Christian world view is not only reasonable in itself but also provides the necessary founda- tion for reason. If you love reason, True Reason explains why Christianity is the best worldview for you.” —Michael Licona, PhD, Associate Professor in Theology, Houston Baptist University, Author of The Resurrection of Jesus “More than a year before he joined our staff, Tom Gilson came alongside Ratio Christi to help lead dozens of students to the atheist Reason Rally on the National Mall in Washington, DC. They entered a modern-day ‘lions’ den’ to share Christ’s love and truth, giving away bottles of water and excerpts from True Reason’s first edition. Armed with logic and True Reason, these students engaged in conversation with anyone who would listen.
    [Show full text]
  • Sam Harris and Richard Dawkins Talk Ethics in Oxford Keeping Public
    BHA news BHA news www.humanism.org.uk Issue 3 2011 Wear a smile and have friends; wear a scowl and have wrinkles. What do we live for if not to make the world less difficult for each other? — Attributed to George Eliot Keeping public services fair, inclusive, and secular The BHA is at the forefront of the to provide those services through its campaign to keep public services ‘Poppy Project’. The Salvation Army, an shared, inclusive, and secular. Since we evangelical organisation, has previously published our report and policy paper declared to parliament that it would on public service reform, Quality and be ‘impossible’ for it to be ‘religiously Equality: Human Rights, Public Services neutral’ in the provision of public and Religious Organisations (http:// services. The Salvation Army’s position tinyurl.com/Q-EReport) in 2007, we have statement on homosexuality also details been working hard for legal and policy homosexual behaviour as ‘self evidently changes to ensure that religious groups abnormal’ and condemns gay people to a cannot discriminate when they provide life of celibacy. public services. We’ve also been trying We believe that it is deeply to publicise the issues at stake, which, ones. In fact, many religious groups which concerning that the government has in light of more public services being wish to take on the delivery of public considered it appropriate to stop contracted to religious organisations, are services may be particularly conservative, contracting with an organisation specialist getting evermore serious for employees, evangelical, unrepresentative, or in working with victims of sexual service users, and the public alike.
    [Show full text]
  • Humanism: the 10 Most Asked Questions Table of Contents
    Humanism: The 10 Most Asked Questions Table of Contents The 10 Most Asked Questions Definitions Beliefs What Do Humanists Believe About…? Values Morals, Ethics and Goodness Faith and Reason Life and Death Organized Religion Customs, Ceremonies and Celebrations Some Non-believers You Might Recognize Becoming a Humanist Appendix: Further Reading and Resources About the Author Copyright 2016, John Sias Humanism: The 10 Most Asked Questions The 10 Most Asked Questions What is a humanist? A humanist is a person who contends that belief in a supernatural being is not essential to being a good person and living a good life. A short definition is “Being good without a god." Who might be a humanist? Among humanists are those who are call themselves agnostic, atheist, “bright”, cynic, deist, freethinker, naturalist, nothing, non-religious, rationalist, secular, secular humanist, skeptic, spiritualist. What does a humanist believe about the purpose of life? For each individual to reach his potential and to help others do the same. And when choosing a purpose of life, your choice should be based on how you, as a human being, should relate to other human beings. Humanists think that almost everyone is capable of choosing purposes and goals that will help guide their life. What does a humanist believe about afterlife? The only afterlife we humans might experience is the way we have affected individuals and institutions during our lifetime. There is neither heaven nor hell. What does a humanist believe about salvation? They do not believe that anyone is born sinful or guilty. Therefore, they do not believe anyone needs to be “saved." What does a humanist believe about evolution? The earth is 4.5 billion years old.
    [Show full text]
  • To Download This Guide in PDF Format
    OPENING MINDS CHANGING HEARTS A Guide to Being Openly Secular A Beginner’s Guide to Becoming Openly Secular. Copyright © 2015 Openly Secular. Some Rights Reserved. Content written by Lori L. Fazzino, M.A., University of Nevada, Las Vegas Graphic design by Sarah Hamilton, www.smfhamilton.com This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International. More information is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Openly Secular grants you permission for all non-commercial uses, including reproduction, distribution, and adaptation, so long as you provide proper credit to Openly Secular and provide others with the same rights you are receiving. ABOUT THE OPENLY SECULAR CaMPAIGN Openly Secular is a coalition project that promotes tolerance and equality of people regardless of their belief systems. Founded in 2013, the Openly Secular Coalition is led by four organizations - Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science, Secular Coalition for America, Secular Student Alliance, and Stiefel Freethought Foundation. This campaign is also joined by national partner organizations from the secular movement as well as organizations that are allies to our cause. OUR MISSION The mission of Openly Secular is to eliminate discrimination and increase acceptance by getting secular people - including atheists, freethinkers, agnostics, humanists and nonreligious people - to be open about their beliefs. www.openlysecular.org SPECIAL THANKS We would like to thank PFLAG, www.pflag.org, and the Secular Safe Zone Project, www.secularsafezone.org, for allowing us to adapt pieces of the Be Yourself: Questions and Answers for Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgender Youth and the Secular Safe Zone Resource Guide for Allies for this text.
    [Show full text]
  • Threading My Prayer Rug One Woman’S Journey from Pakistani Muslim to American Muslim by Sabeeha Rehman
    307 West 36th Street ARCADE 11th Floor New York, NY 10018 PUBLISHING T (212) 643-6816 F (212) 643-6819 www.arcadepub.com ON SALE NOW CONTACT: Brianna Scharfenberg [email protected] “Funny and frank, acute and compassionate, this story of an immigrant ‘fish out of water’ who falls in love with her adopted American home is for all of us, and for all times—but current events also make it the story for this time. As Americans consiDer who they were, are, and want to be in the future, they coulD have no better guide than Sabeeha Rehman. I can’t imagine our country, or my bookshelf, without her.” —Susan Choi, Pulitzer Prize finalist anD author of A Person of Interest and My Education Threading My Prayer Rug One Woman’s Journey from Pakistani Muslim to American Muslim By Sabeeha Rehman Praise for Threading My Prayer Rug The Wall Street Journal “Houses of Worship” column in July (excerpt: “My Muslim Christmas in July”) and September (op-ed: “Memories of the Hajj, From Mother to Son”) ”Rehman’s personal journey is her own, but speaks broadly to all immigrant journeys in contemporary America. With so much discussion about immigrants from Muslim in the national conversation, it’s good to have a story with this unique perspective. we see how she navigates American society, retains her identity and passes it on to her children and community, accepts becoming an American, moDifies some of her traditions while manufacturing new ones, and enriches her own life anD the lives of those around her—thus weaving her contribution into the fabric of America, and enriching the American tapestry.” —Booklist (starred review) & Top 10 Religion & Spirituality Book of 2016 “A culturally rich and rewarding personal chronicle of ethnic faith and intermingled tradition.”—Kirkus Review “Rehman lends a strong and compelling voice to moderate Muslims, and her discussion of her faith and the areas she believes need modernization illustrate the different opinions within the Muslim community.”—Library Journal “With sparkling acedotes .
    [Show full text]
  • Free Will, Sam Harris Combines Neuroscience and Psychology to Lay This Illusion to Rest at Last
    “Free will is an illusion so convincing that people simply refuse to believe that we don’t have it. In Free Will, Sam Harris combines neuroscience and psychology to lay this illusion to rest at last. Like all of Harris’s books, this one will not only unsettle you but make you think deeply. Read it: you have no choice.” —JERRY A. COYNE, Professor of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, and author of Why Evolution Is True A BELIEF IN FREE WILL touches nearly everything that human beings value. It is difficult to think about law, politics, religion, public policy, intimate relationships, morality—as well as feelings of remorse or personal achievement—without first imagining that every person is the true source of his or her thoughts and actions. And yet the facts tell us that free will is an illusion. In this enlightening book, Sam Harris argues that this truth about the human mind does not undermine morality or diminish the importance of social and political freedom, but it can and should change the way we think about some of the most important questions in life. “In this elegant and provocative book, Sam Harris demonstrates—with great intellectual ferocity and panache—that free will is an inherently flawed and incoherent concept, even in subjective terms. If he is right, the book will radically change the way we view ourselves as human beings.” —V. S. RAMACHANDRAN, Director of the Center for Brain and Cognition, UCSD, and author of The Tell-Tale Brain “Brilliant and witty—and never less than incisive—Free Will shows that Sam Harris can say more in 13,000 words than most people do in 100,000.” —OLIVER SACKS “Many say that believing that there is no free will is impossible—or, if possible, will cause nihilism and despair.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Islamic Law?
    What is Islamic Law? The Fifth Annual John E. James Distinguished Lecture Walter F. George School of Law Mercer University Macon, Georgia September 20, 2005 by Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf* HORACE W. FLEMING: We are indebted to John E. James and the Mercer Law School for their generosity for making this event possible. Mr. James has made an outstanding contribution not only to the legal profession, but also to his community and to his Alma Mater, Mercer University. * Founder and CEO, American Society for Muslim Advancement (ASMA) (first American organization committed to bringing Muslims and non-Muslims together through programs in culture, art, academia and current affairs); Imam, Masjid Al-Farah (a New York City mosque). Architect, Cordoba Initiative (interreligious blueprint for improving relations between America and the Muslim world and pursuing Middle East peace). Teacher, Islam and Sufism at the Center for Religious Inquiry at St. Bartholomew's Church, the New York Seminary, and the Chautauqua Institution. Member, National Interreligious Initiative for Peace in Washington, D.C.; World Economic Forum's Council of 100 Leaders; Board of Trustees, Islamic Center of New York; Advisor, Interfaith Center of New York. Books published: ISLAM: A SEARCH FOR MEANING (1995); ISLAM: A SACRED LAW (2000); WHAT'S RIGHT WITH ISLAM: A NEW VISION FOR MUSLIMS AND THE WEST (2004). 595 596 MERCER LAW REVIEW [Vol. 57 Among his many valuable contributions to Mercer, John James chaired the Law School Board of Visitors in 1979. Mr. James negotiated the largest settlement ever entered into the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, and you will note from your program that Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Atheism” February 2012 Glasgow Unitarian Church
    Jim Millar “The New Atheism” February 2012 Glasgow Unitarian Church Introduction My topic this morning is “The New Atheism”. It is not my intention to discuss the merits or demerits of Atheism as a theological position, but rather to look at the phenomenon that has been labelled “New Atheism” which has emerged in the last decade. Atheism is of course not new in itself. For example the Greek philosopher known as Theodorus the Atheist lived around 300BCE and it was in the 19 th century that Frederick Nietzsche reliably informed us that, “God is dead.” So who then are these New Atheists? While there are many writers in this field, by far the most notable are those referred to by Richard Dawkins as “The Four Horsemen”, alluding to the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse. These are; Richard Dawkins , the British evolutionary biologist, author and emeritus fellow of New College, Oxford. His most notable work in this field is the 2006 publication The God Delusion . Sam Harris , the American author, philosopher, neuroscientist, and co-founder and CEO of Project Reason. He is the author of The End of Faith: Religion Terror and The Future of Reason , which was published in 2004. Daniel Dennett , the American philosopher, writer, cognitive scientist and Professor at Tufts University. Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon (2007) is his most famous work on this subject. Finally the late Christopher Hitchens . Hitchens was an English American author, essayist and journalist most notable in this field for his 2007 book, God Is Not Great; How Religion Spoils Everything.
    [Show full text]
  • Mosques As American Institutions: Mosque Attendance, Religiosity and Integration Into the Political System Among American Muslims
    Religions 2011, 2, 504-524; doi:10.3390/rel2040504 OPEN ACCESS religions ISSN 2077-1444 www.mdpi.com/journal/religions Article Mosques as American Institutions: Mosque Attendance, Religiosity and Integration into the Political System among American Muslims Karam Dana 1, Matt A. Barreto 2,* and Kassra A.R. Oskooii 2 1 Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies, Department of Government, 1737 Cambridge Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 University of Washington, Department of Political Science, Gowen Hall 101, Box 353530, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-206-616-3584; Fax: +1-206-685-2146. Received: 26 June 2011; in revised form: 9 September 2011 / Accepted: 16 September 2011 / Published: 27 September 2011 Abstract: Religious institutions and places of worship have played a pivotal role in American Politics. What about the role of the mosque? Does the mosque, as an institution, in any sense play a different role than that of churches or synagogues in political participation? Some scholars have argued that Islam as a religion and a culture is incompatible with liberal, democratic American values; not only is Islam inconsistent with the West, but it poses a direct conflict. This viewpoint has likewise been popularized in American and European media and by some government officials who have labeled Muslims as enemies of freedom and democracy. Through the examination of the Muslim American Public Opinion Survey (MAPOS), which has a large sample size of American Muslim respondents (N = 1410), we argue that the mosque emerges as an important indicator for Muslim social and political integration into American society.
    [Show full text]
  • Sam Harris on Religion in Peace and Conflict
    1 UPPSALA UNIVERSITET Department of Theology Master program of Religion in Peace and Conflict Masters thesis, 15 hp VT, 2017 Supervisor: Brian Palmer Sam Harris on Religion in Peace and Conflict Abstract This thesis discusses the works and views of Sam Harris on topics related to religion in peace and conflict. A particular emphasis is placed on the topics of reason, atheism, terrorism, Islam, and morality. Using content analysis of a wide variety of works of Harris, including books, articles, talks, and podcasts, his main views on the aforementioned topics are presented and commented on. Moreover, through an analysis of Harris’s techniques of argumentation, it has been found that some of the main techniques include: humor, thought experiments, comparisons, simplicity, and sophistication. Keywords Sam Harris, atheism, religion, peace, conflict, reason, Islam, morality RAFAL JENNEK 800604-0000 [email protected] Rafal Jennek 2 Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Choice of the topic .................................................................................................................................................... 3 Why Sam Harris ......................................................................................................................................................... 8 About Sam Harris .....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ATHEISM – Paths to Humanism a Lot Of
    ATHEISM – Paths to Humanism A lot of people think that atheism is a recent idea. But religious disbelief actually has a long and fascinating history. Just as a student of Christianity would want to know about a few rather significant things that happened 2,000 years ago, someone who wants a better understanding of atheism likewise needs to know what atheism has been up to for the past 30 centuries or so. Atheism in the distant past and in different cultures People tend to think of certain times and places as completely uniform in their beliefs. India is full to the brim with Hindus. The Greeks all worshipped the gods of Olympus. Everyone in Medieval Europe was Christian. Right? A closer look shows all of these claims to be misleading. Just as political “red states” (Republicans) and “blue states” (Democrats) in the United States are really all various shades of purple, every place and time in human history includes a lot of different beliefs — including atheism. That’s not to say all points of view have the same chance to speak into the cultural microphone. Religion in general and the majority religion in particular tend to call the shots and write the histories, especially prior to the late 18th century. Add to that the fact that atheism has often been punishable by imprisonment or death, and you can see why atheists in certain times and places tend to whisper. But the voices are there, including some in the distant past and in cultures both in and out of Europe. The thread of atheism in the ancient and medieval world is a story that very few people know.
    [Show full text]