India's Energy Security
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
SAARC Countries I Ii Seminar Book
Munich Personal RePEc Archive Future-of-Eco-Coop-in-SARRC- Countries Shah, Syed Akhter Hussain Pakistan Institute of Development Economics Islamabad 2014 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/59275/ MPRA Paper No. 59275, posted 30 Dec 2014 23:42 UTC Future of Economic Cooperation in SAARC Countries i ii Seminar Book Future of Economic Cooperation in SAARC Countries iii CONTENTS Acknowledgements Acronyms Introduction 1 Welcome Address 12 Ambassador (R) Sohail Amin Opening Remarks 15 Kristof W. Duwaerts Inaugural Address 18 Riaz Mohammad Khan Concluding Address 24 Dr. Ishrat Hussain Concluding Remarks 26 Kristof W. Duwaerts Vote of Thanks 27 Ambassador (R) Sohail Amin Recommendations 29 CHAPTER 1 Regional Trade — Driver for Economic Growth 37 Dr. Kamal Monnoo CHAPTER 2 Meeting Energy Requirement: Potential for Intra-regional Energy Trade 61 Dr. Janak Lal Karmacharya CHAPTER 3 Building Regional Transport and Communication Infrastructure 81 Ms. Arshi Saleem Hashmi iv Seminar Book CHAPTER 4 Developing Energy Corridor from Central and West Asia to South Asia 101 Prof. Savita Pande CHAPTER 5 The New Silk Road Initiative: Economic Dividends 119 Mr. Nabi Sroosh and Mr.Yosuf Sabir CHAPTER 6 China‟s Growing Economic Relations with South Asia 127 Dr. Liu Zongyi CHAPTER 7 Fast Tracking Economic Collaboration in SAARC Countries 146 Dr. Pervez Tahir CHAPTER 8 Towards an Asian Century: Future of Economic Cooperation in SAARC Countries: A View from FPCCI 159 Mr. Muhammad Ali CHAPTER 9 Economic Cooperation among SAARC Countries: Political Constraints 163 Dr. Rashid Ahmad Khan CHAPTER 10 Implications of Bilateral and Sub-regional Trade Agreements on Economic Cooperation: A Case Study of SAARC in South Asia 177 Dr. -
General Awareness Capsule for AFCAT II 2021 14 Points of Jinnah (March 9, 1929) Phase “II” of CDM
General Awareness Capsule for AFCAT II 2021 1 www.teachersadda.com | www.sscadda.com | www.careerpower.in | Adda247 App General Awareness Capsule for AFCAT II 2021 Contents General Awareness Capsule for AFCAT II 2021 Exam ............................................................................ 3 Indian Polity for AFCAT II 2021 Exam .................................................................................................. 3 Indian Economy for AFCAT II 2021 Exam ........................................................................................... 22 Geography for AFCAT II 2021 Exam .................................................................................................. 23 Ancient History for AFCAT II 2021 Exam ............................................................................................ 41 Medieval History for AFCAT II 2021 Exam .......................................................................................... 48 Modern History for AFCAT II 2021 Exam ............................................................................................ 58 Physics for AFCAT II 2021 Exam .........................................................................................................73 Chemistry for AFCAT II 2021 Exam.................................................................................................... 91 Biology for AFCAT II 2021 Exam ....................................................................................................... 98 Static GK for IAF AFCAT II 2021 ...................................................................................................... -
Development and Displacement in Chenab Valley After Construction of Power Project at Kishtwar
THE COMMUNICATIONS Vol. 21, No. 1 (2012) DEVELOPMENT AND DISPLACEMENT IN CHENAB VALLEY AFTER CONSTRUCTION OF POWER PROJECT AT KISHTWAR Touseef Iqbal Butt* Abstract Has the regional displacement widened in the post-reform period? This study attempts to probe into this by analysing growth rates of aggregate and sectoral domestic product of major states in the pre (1980s) and post-reform (1990s) decades. Our results indicate that while the growth rate of gross domestic product has improved only marginally in the post-reform decade, the regional displacement and developments in state domestic product has widened much more drastically. Industrial states are now growing much faster than the backward states, and there is no evidence of convergence of growth rates among states. Even more disturbing is that there is now an inverse relationship between local population growth and migrational saturation. The cultural values of societies are now in a new era. The very well socio-economic collaboration stream led to make a strong change in entire society. This has a very serious implication for employment and the political economy of India. India is already in a growing in term of power projects and developmental world but where the people enjoys the benefits and fruit of developments other hand they have to become the part of displacement form their native place and the resources and sources of their own has been the finalized by the legal authorities and this research paper is extremely based on the regional displacement with effect of the development. All the societal life imbibes the values of the socio-cultural and the socio-economic asserts as a whole. -
Transboundary River Basin Overview – Indus
0 [Type here] Irrigation in Africa in figures - AQUASTAT Survey - 2016 Transboundary River Basin Overview – Indus Version 2011 Recommended citation: FAO. 2011. AQUASTAT Transboundary River Basins – Indus River Basin. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Rome, Italy The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way. All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licencerequest or addressed to [email protected]. -
The Indus Equation 2 Introduction CHAPTER 1 Overview of Pakistan’S Water Resources
C-306, Montana, Lokhandwala Complex Andheri West, Mumbai 400 053, India Email: [email protected] www.strategicforesight.com Project Advice Ilmas Futehally Authors Gitanjali Bakshi Sahiba Trivedi Creative Preeti Rathi Motwani Copyright © Strategic Foresight Group, 2011 Permission is hereby granted to quote or reproduce from this report with due credit to Strategic Foresight Group Processed by MadderRed, Mumbai FOREWORD Strategic Foresight Group has been a consistent advocate of reason in relations between India and Pakistan. It has recognised water as a critical determinant of peace and development in many parts of the world. This paper brings together these two strands in our work. It will be in order to recall some of the earlier work done by Strategic Foresight Group to urge rationality in India- Pakistan relations. In 2004, we published the first ever comprehensive assessment of Cost of Conflict between India-Pakistan in a report with this title. In 2005 we published The Final Settlement where we strongly argued that integrated water development would need to be a part of long-lasting solution between the two countries. Since then we have been regularly advocating a pragmatic approach for India and Pakistan to foster cooperation and move ahead to enable social and economic development of their people, instead of wasting precious resources on terrorism, counter terrorism and an arms race. We initiated work on water on the advice of an international conference onResponsibility to the Future, which was co-hosted by SFG with the United Nations Global Compact, inaugurated by the President of India and attended by delegates from 25 countries in June 2008. -
Mckinney Historical and Current Transboundary Water Issues LS
Historical and Current Transboundary Water Issues Daene McKinney Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Outline • Objective – Provide an historical sketch (Soviet and Post-Soviet period) of transboundary water issues in the region in relation to the political and governance landscapes. Include Aral Sea basin and Indus, and Ganges • Topics – Transboundary Waters – International Water Law – Aral Sea Basin – Syr Darya Basin – Amu Darya Basin – Indus Basin – Ganges Basin – Conclusions Transboundary Waters: 263 Basins Foreign Policy – September/October 2001 • Harbingers of conflict: • Some warning signs: – Unilateral development – Large scale development – Internationalized basin – Rapid changes – No / ineffective institutions – Civil unrest – General animosity – Downstream hegemony Transboundary Waters: What’s the Issue? • Difficulties in reaching multilateral transboundary water resources agreements: – Domestic and international politics – National priorities, and – Skewed perceptions of costs, benefits and risks of actions • Decisions among countries sharing a limited resource based on: – Consultation, – Negotiation, – Information sharing, and – Cost allocation Transboundary Waters: International Law • Guidelines for sharing transboundary water • Share Information • Notify and consult with neighbors about proposed works • Utilize water in equitable and reasonable manner – Optimal and sustainable – Consider relevant factors • Cooperate in use, development and protection • Prevent harm – Take appropriate measures -
An Engineering Perspective of Water Sharing Issues in Pakistan
water Review An Engineering Perspective of Water Sharing Issues in Pakistan Muhammad Atiq Ur Rehman Tariq 1,* , Nick van de Giesen 2 , Shahmir Janjua 3, Muhammad Laiq Ur Rahman Shahid 4 and Rashid Farooq 5 1 College of Engineering and Science, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 8001, Australia 2 Water Resources Management Section, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, 2600GA Delft, The Netherlands; [email protected] 3 Department of Civil Engineering, Capital University of Science and Technology, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan; [email protected] 4 Department of Electronics Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Taxila, Rawalpindi 46000, Pakistan; [email protected] 5 Department of Civil Engineering, International Islamic University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 20 December 2019; Accepted: 28 January 2020; Published: 11 February 2020 Abstract: Water sharing within the states/provinces of a country and cross-border is unavoidable. Conflicts between the sharing entities might turn more severe due to additional dependency on water, growing population, and reduced availability as a result of climate change at many locations. Pakistan, being an agricultural country, is severely water stressed and heading toward a worsening situation in the near future. Pakistan is heading toward water scarcity as water availability in the Indus basin is becoming critical. Being a downstream riparian of India and Afghanistan in the Indus basin, water availability depends on the releases of water from both countries. The Indus Water Treaty is governing the water distribution rights between India and Pakistan. However, there exists no proper agreement between Pakistan and Afghanistan and the construction of new dams on the Kabul River is another threat to water availability to Pakistan. -
Purpose of Hydroelectric Generation.Only 13 Dams Are Used for Flood Control in the Basin and 19 Dams Are Used for Irrigation Along with Other Usage
Indus (Up to border) Basin Version 2.0 www.india-wris.nrsc.gov.in 1 Indus (Up to border) Basin Preface Optimal management of water resources is the necessity of time in the wake of development and growing need of population of India. The National Water Policy of India (2002) recognizes that development and management of water resources need to be governed by national perspectives in order to develop and conserve the scarce water resources in an integrated and environmentally sound basis. The policy emphasizes the need for effective management of water resources by intensifying research efforts in use of remote sensing technology and developing an information system. In this reference a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was signed on December 3, 2008 between the Central Water Commission (CWC) and National Remote Sensing Centre (NRSC), Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) to execute the project “Generation of Database and Implementation of Web enabled Water resources Information System in the Country” short named as India-WRIS WebGIS. India-WRIS WebGIS has been developed and is in public domain since December 2010 (www.india- wris.nrsc.gov.in). It provides a ‘Single Window solution’ for all water resources data and information in a standardized national GIS framework and allow users to search, access, visualize, understand and analyze comprehensive and contextual water resources data and information for planning, development and Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM). Basin is recognized as the ideal and practical unit of water resources management because it allows the holistic understanding of upstream-downstream hydrological interactions and solutions for management for all competing sectors of water demand. -
The Indus Waters Treaty's Alternative Dispute Resolution Provisions and Their Role in the Tenuous Peace Between India and Pakistan, 5 Y.B
Arbitration Law Review Volume 5 Yearbook on Arbitration and Mediation Article 24 2013 Defusing Hydroelectric Brinkmanship: The nduI s Waters Treaty's Alternative Dispute Resolution Provisions and Their Role in the Tenuous Peace Between India and Pakistan Thomas E. Robins Follow this and additional works at: http://elibrary.law.psu.edu/arbitrationlawreview Part of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons Recommended Citation Thomas E. Robins, Defusing Hydroelectric Brinkmanship: The Indus Waters Treaty's Alternative Dispute Resolution Provisions and Their Role in the Tenuous Peace Between India and Pakistan, 5 Y.B. Arb. & Mediation 389 (2013). This Student Submission - Foreign Decisional Law is brought to you for free and open access by Penn State Law eLibrary. It has been accepted for inclusion in Arbitration Law Review by an authorized editor of Penn State Law eLibrary. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DEFUSING HYDROELECTRIC BRINKMANSHIP: THE INDUS WATERS TREATY’S ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROVISIONS AND THEIR ROLE IN THE TENUOUS PEACE BETWEEN INDIA AND PAKISTAN Thomas E. Robins* I. INTRODUCTION “Crop earnings decline every year and water shortages have affected fifty percent of our agricultural business. The problems with India can only be resolved with war.”1 For saber-rattlers on both sides of the Kashmiri border, water rights have become part and parcel to the narrative of Indo-Pakistani tensions. Beginning with partition in 1947, three full-blown wars, numerous undeclared conflicts, and an active insurgency -
Two Neighbours and a Treaty Baglihar Project in Hot Waters
TRANSBOUNDARY DISPUTES Two Neighbours and a Treaty Baglihar Project in Hot Waters Pakistan has objected to several features of the Baglihar hydropower project on the Chenab river in Jammu and Kashmir contending that it violates the Indus Water Treaty. The World Bank, which brokered the IWT, has appointed a neutral expert to resolve the differences. Diplomats fear these developments might cast a shadow on the composite dialogue process as seeking arbitration on the dam means breaking out of the bilateral framework. RAJESH SINHA led to the signing of the IWT in 1960 at Karachi. The signatories were Mohammad his project was conceived in 1992, Ayub Khan for Pakistan, Jawaharlal Nehru approved in 1996 and construction for India and W A B Illif of the World Bank. Tbegan in 1999. The Baglihar Hydro- The treaty has worked well for years. But power Project (BHP) is located on the since the 1980s the differences that cropped river Chenab in Ramban tehsil of Doda up over several projects have not been district, Jammu and Kashmir (J and K). It sorted out despite protracted talks. Pakistan is about 150 km from the nearest railhead, has not only opposed the BHP on river Jammu, near Batote on the Jammu-Srinagar Chenab, it has also opposed the Wullar Highway-1A on the Nasri bypass road. The Barrage/Tulbul navigation project on the BHP will have an installed capacity of 450 Jhelum, the Swalakote hydroelectric project MW during phase I and 900 MW during and Dul Hasti hydroelectric project on the phase II. It is a Rs 4,000 crore venture of the Chenab and the Kishanganga hydroelectric government of Jand K and about Rs 2,500 project on the Kishanganga in J and K. -
The Indus Equation 2 Introduction CHAPTER 1 Overview of Pakistan’S Water Resources
C-306, Montana, Lokhandwala Complex Andheri West, Mumbai 400 053, India Email: [email protected] www.strategicforesight.com Project Advice Ilmas Futehally Authors Gitanjali Bakshi Sahiba Trivedi Creative Preeti Rathi Motwani Copyright © Strategic Foresight Group, 2011 Permission is hereby granted to quote or reproduce from this report with due credit to Strategic Foresight Group Processed by MadderRed, Mumbai FOREWORD Strategic Foresight Group has been a consistent advocate of reason in relations between India and Pakistan. It has recognised water as a critical determinant of peace and development in many parts of the world. This paper brings together these two strands in our work. It will be in order to recall some of the earlier work done by Strategic Foresight Group to urge rationality in India- Pakistan relations. In 2004, we published the first ever comprehensive assessment of Cost of Conflict between India-Pakistan in a report with this title. In 2005 we published The Final Settlement where we strongly argued that integrated water development would need to be a part of long-lasting solution between the two countries. Since then we have been regularly advocating a pragmatic approach for India and Pakistan to foster cooperation and move ahead to enable social and economic development of their people, instead of wasting precious resources on terrorism, counter terrorism and an arms race. We initiated work on water on the advice of an international conference onResponsibility to the Future, which was co-hosted by SFG with the United Nations Global Compact, inaugurated by the President of India and attended by delegates from 25 countries in June 2008. -
BAGLIHAR Hydroelectric Plant
GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN OF INDIA THE INDUS WATERS TREATY 1960 BAGLIHAR Hydroelectric Plant Expert Determination on points of difference referred by the Government of Pakistan under the provisions of the Indus Waters Treaty Prof. Raymond Lafitte ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE Lausanne, FÉDÉRALE DE LAUSANNE 12 February 2007 Baglihar Dam and Hydroelectric Plant Page i Expert Determination A philosopher statesman of the late eighteenth century is reputed to have pronounced this obiter dictum: “An international treaty that gives one party all that it wants cannot be a good treaty,” and Sir William Iliff asserts: “It can, I think, be said of the Indus Waters Treaty, that at least it does not vitiate that criterion.” Foreword by Sir William Iliff Former Vice-President of the World Bank Indus Waters Treaty An Exercise in International Mediation Niranjan D. Gulhati Allied Publishers, 1973 Baglihar Dam and Hydroelectric Plant Page ii Expert Determination Delegations of Government of Pakistan and of Government of India Meeting No. 5, Washington, D.C., 9 November 2006 Baglihar Dam and Hydroelectric Plant Page iii Expert Determination 16 4 6 12 10 11 5 7 22 20 24 18 26 21 9 27 28 3 8 2 29 19 23 1 25 13 14 15 17 Delegation of Pakistan 1. Mr Ashfaq Mahmood, Secretary, Ministry of Water & Power. Leader of the Delegation Mr Abdul Wajid Rana, Minister (Economic), Embassy of Pakistan 2. Mr Jalil Abbas Jillani, Director General (South Asia), Ministry of Foreign Affairs 3. Mr Syed Jamait Ali Shah, Pakistan Commissioner for Indus Waters 4. Mr Syed Feisal Hussain Naqvi, Legal Consultant 5.