Insect. Soc. (2012) 59:61–65 DOI 10.1007/s00040-011-0188-4 Insectes Sociaux

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Males, but not females, mate with multiple partners: a laboratory study of a primitively eusocial wasp marginata

M. C. Shilpa • R. Sen • S. Samudre • R. Gadagkar

Received: 15 November 2010 / Revised: 5 July 2011 / Accepted: 8 July 2011 / Published online: 29 July 2011 Ó International Union for the Study of Social (IUSSI) 2011

Abstract The intense interest in social , on R. marginata females to mate with multiple partners is account of their elaborate sociality and the paradox of consistent with the expectation of monogamy in primitively altruism, has often suffered from considerable gender eusocial with totipotent females, although the imbalance. This is partly due to the fact that worker apparent discrepancy with a previous work with allozyme behaviour and altruism are restricted to the females and markers in natural colonies suggesting that females may partly because males often live off the nest. Yet, under- sometimes mate with two or three different males remains to standing the males, especially in the context of mating be resolved. biology is essential even for understanding the evolution of sociality. Mating patterns have a direct bearing on the levels Keywords Social wasps of intra-colony genetic relatedness, which in turn, along Mating behaviour Multiple mating Single mating with the associated costs and benefits of worker behaviour, are central to our understanding of the evolution of sociality. Although mating takes place away from the nest in natural Introduction colonies of the primitively eusocial wasp Ropalidia mar- ginata, mating can be observed in the laboratory if a male Social hymenopteran females usually mate with one or and a female are placed in a transparent, aerated plastic more males early in their life and store the received sperm in container, and both wasps are in the range of 5–20 days of their spermatheca. This sperm is used in all future fertil- age. Here, we use this setup and show that males, but not izations required for laying female-destined, diploid eggs. females, mate serially with multiple partners. The multiple Females in this order also lay unfertilized haploid mating behaviour of the males is not surprising because in eggs, which develop parthenogenetically and give rise to nature males have to mate with a number of females, only a males. In female social Hymenoptera, both the number of few of whom will go on to lay eggs. The reluctance of mating partners and the effective number of matings vary and are associated with a variety of costs and benefits. Single mating increases the relatedness among the colony members, which may sometimes promote social harmony M. C. Shilpa R. Sen S. Samudre R. Gadagkar Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, (though not always, see Ratnieks et al., 2006), while mul- Bangalore 560012, India tiple mating is thought to bring the advantages of increased supply of sperm, genetic diversity among the brood & R. Sen ( ) (resulting in genetic polyethism and increased immunity) Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA and avoidance of the sex locus load, the costs of evolving e-mail: [email protected] specialized strategies for choosing or resisting mates, etc. (Strassmann, 2001; Crozier and Fjerdingstad, 2001). R. Gadagkar Female single mating is a common female reproductive Evolutionary and Organismal Biology Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Jakkur, Bangalore strategy (effective paternity is often little over 1) for 560064, India stingless bees (Peters et al., 1999), bumble bees (Schmid- 123 62 M. C. Shilpa et al.

Hempel and Schmid-Hempel, 2000), most ants and most show that under this setup, males often mate multiply but vespine and polistine wasps (reviewed in Strassmann, females do not mate with any more than one partner. 2001). However, multiple mating is abundantly found in honeybees (Estoup et al., 1995; Moritz et al., 1995; Oldroyd et al., 1997; Palmer and Oldroyd 2000), some fungus- Materials and methods growing ants (Bekkevold et al., 1999; Bekkevold et al., 1999; Murakami et al., 2000; Fjerdingstad and Boomsma, R. marginata nests with large number of pupae were col- 1998; 2000), harvester ants (Cole and Wiernasz, 1999) and lected in and around Bangalore (13°000N77°320E), India. is occasionally found in vespine wasps (Muralidharan et al., All adults, larvae and eggs were removed from the nests, 1986; Ross 1985, 1986). In all, high polyandry has evolved and the nests with pupae were maintained in ventilated on nine occasions in the social Hymenoptera and about two- plastic boxes and monitored daily for the presence of newly thirds of species are monandrous (Hughes et al., 2008a, b). eclosed wasps. All newly eclosed males and females were Males in social hymenopterans usually emerge from the removed from the nest and kept in isolation in transparent, pupa with mature sperm, and additional sperm production ventilated plastic bottles (22 cm 9 11 cm 9 11 cm) with does not take place in the adult stage (Dumser, 1980; the ad libitum food and water for 5–20 days until they were exception: ergatoid males of the ant genus Cardiocondyla, used for the experiments. Heinze and Ho¨lldobler, 1993). Hymenopteran males are To study multiple mating in males, we introduced one haploid (producing clonal sperm), short-lived and often male and one female simultaneously into a fresh plastic referred to as sperm packets, as they eclose to perform the bottle (as described above). The pair was observed for 1 h or sole function of mating. Single mating associated with till they performed long conjugation behaviour (Sen et al., leaving a mating plug or spermatophore in the female 2010), whichever was earlier. Every occurrence and dura- genital tract is a usual phenomenon for many social hyme- tion of all mating behaviours: unsuccessful attempt to nopteran males (reviewed in Boomsma et al., 2005), mount—UAM, mount—MO (male climbs on to the back of especially in stingless bees, honeybees and some ants. the female), short conjugation—SC (up to 5 s long con- Multiple mating is found in males of bumble bees, social nection of abdominal tips of the male and the female in the wasps and ants (reviewed in Boomsma et al., 2005). mounted condition without any sperm transfer) and long In the primitively eusocial, polistine wasp Ropalidia conjugation—LC (locking of abdominal tips for more than marginata (Gadagkar, 2001), females either become work- 20 s that usually includes sperm transfer) were recorded (for ers in their natal nests or leave to found a new nest of their a detailed description of each of these behaviours please see own. In the event of a loss of natural queen or experimental Sen et al., 2010). If the pair performed long conjugation queen removal in an established nest, one of the workers behaviour, then the female was removed from the bottle becomes aggressive and eventually becomes the next queen immediately and a new virgin female was introduced into of the colony (Gadagkar, 2001). Although many workers in a the bottle. Similar behavioural observation was carried out colony may mate, mating itself is not essential for females to for the second female for 1 h or until the pair performed obtain direct reproductive fitness; unmated females can long conjugation behaviour. We continued to remove the develop their ovaries, suppress the ovarian development of previous female and introduce a new female until the male other, even mated females and can even function as the sole stopped performing the long conjugation behaviour. egg layer of a colony, at least for a while (Chandrashekara Behavioural observations were conducted for every pair. and Gadagkar, 1991). R. marginata males, on the other hand, All females, who took part in long conjugation behaviour, live in their natal nest for about a week and then leave to lead were then dissected to check for the presence of sperm in the a nomadic life. Males appear to wait in the foraging areas and spermatheca. Multiple mating behaviour was studied for 19 mate with the foraging females (Gadagkar, 2001). males. Given the difficulty of studying mating behaviour in To study female multiple mating behaviour, we attemp- natural conditions, Sen et al. (2010) have recently described ted to follow a similar procedure but females who mating behaviour of R. marginata in a laboratory setup and performed the LC behaviour with one male did not take part showed that male and female wasps of 5–20 days of age in the same behaviour with another male in pilot studies. readily mate in transparent, aerated, closed plastic con- Therefore, we followed a different protocol to study if tainers. Using this setup, Sen et al. (2010) and Shilpa et al. females remate (Fig. 1). We first introduced a virgin male (2010) have shown that for either sex, the probability and and female into the plastic container. The pair was observed mate choice are not influenced by body size or nestmateship for 1 h or until the performance of the long conjugation of the partner. Here, we used the same setup to ascertain behaviour, whichever was earlier. Once a female performed whether, when given a chance, males and females would the LC behaviour with a male, we immediately removed the mate multiply (sequentially with multiple partners). We male and introduced the second male (this time was 123 Male multiple mating in the social wasp R. marginata 63

Fig. 1 Protocol to test multiple mating in females. The female and the first male were introduced simultaneously. Immediately after long conjugation (LC) behaviour, the first male was removed and the second male was introduced. The time of LC with the first male was considered as 0 h, and introducing and removing time of subsequent males were adjusted accordingly. Timing of introduction of different males is presented at the top, while the lower panel shows the removal time of the males considered as 0 h). The second male was removed after 1 h and a third male was introduced after 2 h from the time of the LC with the first male. After an hour with the third male, the female was kept in isolation for 1 h and then the fourth male was introduced for 1 h. The fifth male was introduced after 24 h of the first LC behaviour for 1 h. All males were virgins. Behavioural observations were carried out with Fig. 2 Male multiple mating. a Number of males performing long every male, and every occurrence and duration of the mat- conjugation (LC) behaviour with consecutive females. b Probability of ing behaviours (UAM, MO, SC and LC) were recorded. successful mating (sperm transfer) at subsequent mating sequences. Bars carrying same letters are not significantly different from each This protocol was tested for 20 females who showed LC other (Fisher’s exact test, P [ 0.05) behaviour with the first male. To check if the females needed a longer time interval with at least four females (Fig. 2b). The durations of mount between two matings, we used an additional set of 20 and long conjugation behaviour were not significantly dif- females who showed LC behaviour with the first male. For ferent across different partners in the mating sequences this set, we paired the females with a new virgin male for (Mann–Whitney U test, all P values were more than 0.1; 1 h after every 24 h for 4 more days. Thus, every female Fig. 3a, b). However, latency to mount (time difference was paired with five males with a 24-h time interval. between introducing a pair and start of first mount behaviour) Behavioural observations were carried out for each pair for and latency to long conjugation behaviour were significantly every occurrence and duration of the mating behaviours longer for the first partner compared to all subsequent part- (UAM, MO, SC and LC). ners (Mann–Whitney U test, all P values \0.008, a set as To test if multiple mating occurs between the same pair, 0.008 after Bonferroni correction due to six comparisons; we left another set of 20 pairs of wasps in the mating con- Fig. 3c, d). The latency for either behaviour was not signif- tainer for 1 h after the first performance of long conjugation. icantly different between the second, third or fourth pair (Mann–Whitney U test, all P values[0.1; Fig. 3c, d).

Results Females did not mate with multiple partners

Males mate multiply We did not find any occurrence of serial mating (with dif- ferent partners) by the females (n = 20 for hourly interval; Most males in our study were seen to mate multiply, i.e., n = 20 for daily interval). Some females took part in sequentially with multiple partners. Out of 19 males, 4 mated unsuccessful attempt to mount, mount and short conjugation (successfully transferred sperm) with 4 different females with the subsequent males (Fig. 4), but long conjugation each, 5 males mated with 3 females each, 7 males mated behaviour did not take place. All females took part in MO twice and 3 males mated singly; 10 males did not mate at all and SC behaviours with the first male (note, only those (Fig. 2a). Considering only the males that mated with at least females who took part in LC with the first male were chosen one female, about 84% mated with at least two females, for this analysis), but only a few participated in these about 60% with at least three females and about 50% mated behaviours with the subsequent males. The proportion of

123 64 M. C. Shilpa et al.

Fig. 4 Proportion of R. marginata females taking part in an unsuc- cessful attempt to mount (UAM), mount (MO) and short conjugation (SC) behaviour with successive males after a hourly and b daily intervals. All females performed long conjugation (LC) behaviour with only the first males

same male again (unpublished pilot observations). But in this study, none of the pairs performed LC more than once. None of the 20 tested pairs performed any mating related behaviour after the first LC within the 1 h after the first LC.

Discussion

Mating is neither necessary nor sufficient for female wasps Fig. 3 Male multiple mating: durations of a mount, b long conjuga- to obtain direct reproductive fitness in R. marginata tion, c latency to mount and d latency to long conjugation across different female partners in the mating sequence. Bars carrying (Chandrashekara and Gadagkar, 1991). Unlike many other different letters are significantly different from each other (Mann– social hymenopteran species, where only reproductives (or Whitney U test at P \ 0.008) gynes) mate, in R. marginata many females mate but most mated females seldom get an opportunity to lay eggs. It is females who took part in UAM, MO and SC behaviours did therefore not surprising that we found males to mate with not differ between the second and fifth males (Fisher’s exact multiple females in this study, because mating with a single test, all P values were more than 0.005, a set as 0.005 after female does not assure fitness. It should be emphasized that Bonferroni correction due to 10 comparisons). in this study, we not only recorded mating behaviour (long conjugation) but we also confirmed successful sperm Repeated mating between the same pair is rare transfer by the presence of sperm in the spermathecae of the females. Thus, males appear to ejaculate only a part of their If the male was not removed immediately after the first LC, sperm load into each female. By transferring sperm to many then 5-day-old females occasionally performed LC with the females, R. marginata can maximize their chances of siring

123 Male multiple mating in the social wasp R. marginata 65 offspring. Indeed, male R. marginata face a serious Estoup A., Scholl A., Pouvreau A. and Solignac M. 1995. Monoandry conundrum—most females they mate with will never and polyandry in bumble bees (Hymenoptera; Bombinae) as evidenced by highly variable microsatellites. Mol. Ecol. 4: 89-93 become queens and lay female-destined eggs, but the males Fjerdingstad E.J. and Boomsma J.J. 1998. Multiple mating increases have no way of telling which females will do so. Distrib- the sperm stores of Atta colombica leafcutter ant queens. Behav. uting their sperm across many females appears to be their Ecol. Sociobiol. 42: 257-261 best bet. Fjerdingstad E.J. and Boomsma J.J. 2000. Queen mating frequency and relatedness in young Atta sexdens colonies. Insect. Soc. 47: The observed reluctance of females to mate with multiple 354-356 males is consistent with monoandry seen in most other Gadagkar R. 2001. The Social Biology of Ropalidia marginata: Toward polistine wasps including Ropalidia revolutionalis (Hen- Understanding the Evolution of . Harvard University shaw and Crozier, 2004; Hughes et al., 2008). However, a Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts Henshaw M.T. and Crozier R.H. 2004. Mating system and population previous study using allozyme markers to genotype natu- structure of the primitively eusocial wasp Ropalidia revolution- rally mated mothers and their daughters had shown that R. alis: a model system for the evolution of complex societies. Mol. marginata females may sometimes mate with two or three Ecol. 13: 1943–1950 males in nature (Muralidharan et al., 1986). It is possible Hughes W.O.H. 2008a. Ancestral monogamy shows kin selection is key to the evolution of eusociality. Science 320: 1213 that the previous study was inaccurate because of the rela- Hughes W.O.H., Ratnieks F.L.W. and Oldroyd B.P. 2008b. Multiple tive low power of allozyme markers. On the other hand, the paternity or multiple queens: two routes to greater intracolonial present study may be inaccurate because of differences genetic diversity in the eusocial Hymenoptera. J. Evol. Biol. 21: between what the females might do under laboratory con- 1090–1095 Moritz R.F.A., Kryger P., Koeniger G., Koeniger N., Estoup A. and ditions where they are presented with a series of males in Tingek S. 1995. High degree of polyandry in Apis dorsata queens quick succession in the same environment and what they detected by DNA microsatellite variability. Behav. Ecol. Socio- might do in nature where they have access to multiple males biol. 37: 357-363 during different foraging trips, which may be weeks apart Murakami T., Higashi S. and Windsor D. 2000. Mating frequency, colony size, polyethism and sex ratio in fungus-growing ants and hundreds of metres apart. Hence, we would like to (Attini). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 48: 276-284 reserve judgement on the exact situation with regard to Muralidharan K., Shaila M.S. and Gadagkar R. 1986. Evidence for single/multiple mating in R. marginata, pending a more multiple mating in the primitively eusocial wasp Ropalidia margi- powerful study with microsatellite markers, which we now nata (Lep) (Hymenoptera: ). J. Genet. 65: 153-158 Oldroyd B.P., Clifton M.J., Wongsiri S., Rinderer T.E., Sylvester H.A. have initiated. and Crozier R.H. 1997. Polyandry in the genus Apis, particularly Apis andreniformis. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 40: 17-26 Acknowledgments This study was supported by the Department of Palmer K.A. and Oldroyd B.P. 2000. Evolution of multiple mating in Science and Technology, Department of Biotechnology and Ministry the genus Apis. Apidologie 31: 235-248 of Environment and Forests, Government of India. RS was supported Peters J.M., Queller D.C., Imperatriz-Fonseca V.L., Roubik D.W. and by a senior research fellowship of the Council of Scientific and Strassmann J.E. 1999. Mate number, kin selection and social Industrial Research. RS and RG designed the study; MCS and SS made conflicts in stingless bees and honeybees. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B the quantitative behavioural observations; RS dissected the female 266: 379-384 wasps; RS and MCS analysed the data; RG supervised the study; RS, Ratnieks F.L.W., Foster K.R. and Wenseleers T. 2006. Conflict MCS and RG co-wrote the paper. We thank three anonymous referees resolution in insect societies. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 51: 581-608 for useful comments that helped improve this paper. Ross K.G. 1985. Aspects of worker reproduction in four social wasp species (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Vespidae). J. Zool. Lond. 205: 411-424 Ross K.G. 1986. Kin Selection and the problem of sperm utilization in References social insects. Nature 323: 798-800 Schmid-Hempel R. and Schmid-Hempel P. 2000 Female mating Bekkevold D., Frydenberg J. and Boomsma J.J. 1999. Multiple mating frequencies in Bombus spp. from Central Europe. Insect. Soc. 47: and facultative polygyny in the Panamanian leafcutter ant 36-41 Acromyrmex echinatior. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 46: 103-109 Sen R., Samudre S., Shilpa M.C., Tarak R.C. and Gadagkar R. 2010. Boomsma J.J., Baer B. and Heinze J. 2005. The evolution of male traits Middle aged wasps mate through most of the year, without regard in social insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 50: 395-420 to body size, ovarian development and nestmateship: A labora- Chandrashekara K. and Gadagkar R. 1991. Unmated queens in the tory study of the primitively eusocial wasp Ropalidia marginata. primitively eusocial wasp Ropalidia marginata (Lep) (Hyme- Insect. Soc. 57: 95-103 noptera: Vespidae). Insect. Soc. 38: 213-216 Shilpa M.C., Sen R. and Gadagkar R. 2010. Nestmateship and body Crozier R.H. and Fjerdingstad E.J. Polyandry in social Hymenoptera – size do not influence mate choice in males and females: A disunity in diversity? Ann. Zool. Fennici 38: 267-285 laboratory study of a primitively eusocial wasp Ropalidia margi- Cole B.J. and Wiernasz D.C. 1999. The selective advantage of low nata. Behav. Proc. 85: 42-46 relatedness. Science 285: 891-893 Strassmann J.E. 2001. The rarity of multiple mating by females in the Dumser J.B. 1980. The regulation of spermatogenesis in insects. Annu. social Hymenoptera. Insect. Soc. 48:1-13 Rev. Entomol. 25: 341-369

123