Genx Chemicals”

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Genx Chemicals” EPA-823-P-18-001 Public Comment Draft Human Health Toxicity Values for Hexafluoropropylene Oxide (HFPO) Dimer Acid and Its Ammonium Salt (CASRN 13252-13-6 and CASRN 62037-80-3) Also Known as “GenX Chemicals” This document is a Public Comment draft. It has not been formally released by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and should not at this stage be construed to represent Agency policy. This information is distributed solely for the purpose of public review. This document is a draft for review purposes only and does not constitute Agency policy. DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE NOVEMBER 2018 Human Health Toxicity Values for Hexafluoropropylene Oxide (HFPO) Dimer Acid and Its Ammonium Salt (CASRN 13252-13-6 and CASRN 62037- 80-3) Also Known as “GenX Chemicals” Prepared by: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water (4304T) Health and Ecological Criteria Division Washington, DC 20460 EPA Document Number: 823-P-18-001 NOVEMBER 2018 This document is a draft for review purposes only and does not constitute Agency policy. DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE NOVEMBER 2018 Disclaimer This document is a public comment draft for review purposes only. This information is distributed solely for the purpose of public comment. It has not been formally disseminated by EPA. It does not represent and should not be construed to represent any Agency determination or policy. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. i This document is a draft for review purposes only and does not constitute Agency policy. DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE NOVEMBER 2018 Acknowledgments This document was prepared by the Health and Ecological Criteria Division, Office of Science and Technology, Office of Water (OW) of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). OW leads for the assessment include Brittany Jacobs, PhD; Greg Miller, MS; and Jamie Strong, PhD. OW scientists who provided valuable contributions to the development of this assessment include Joyce Donohue, PhD and Barbara Soares, PhD. The Agency gratefully acknowledges the valuable contributions of EPA scientists from the Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, including Catherine Aubee; Amy Babcock, MPH, DABT, MRSB; Amy Benson, MS, DABT; Tracy Behrsing, PhD; Chris Brinkerhoff, PhD; Tala Henry, PhD; and Laurence Libelo, PhD. This document was provided for review by staff in the following EPA Program Offices and Regions: • Office of Water • Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, Office of Pesticide Programs • Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics • Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, Office of Science Coordination and Policy • Office of Land and Emergency Management • Office of Air and Radiation, Office of Transportation and Air Quality • Office of Air and Radiation, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards • Office of Policy • Office of Children’s Health Protection • Office of Research and Development • Regions 1–10 ii This document is a draft for review purposes only and does not constitute Agency policy. DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE NOVEMBER 2018 Contents 1.0 Introduction and Background ........................................................................................... 1 1.1 History of Assessment of GenX Chemicals ..................................................................... 1 1.2 Uses of GenX Chemicals under TSCA ............................................................................ 2 1.3 Occurrence ....................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Other Assessments of GenX Chemicals........................................................................... 4 1.4.1 North Carolina Assessment....................................................................................... 4 1.4.2 Report by the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment ................. 4 2.0 Nature of the Stressor ........................................................................................................ 5 2.1 Chemical/Physical Properties ........................................................................................... 5 2.2 Environmental Fate .......................................................................................................... 8 2.2.1 Water ......................................................................................................................... 8 2.2.2 Air ............................................................................................................................. 8 2.2.3 Sediments and Soils .................................................................................................. 9 2.2.4 Biodegradation .......................................................................................................... 9 2.2.5 Incineration ............................................................................................................... 9 2.2.6 Bioaccumulation ....................................................................................................... 9 2.3 Toxicokinetics ................................................................................................................ 10 2.3.1 Absorption............................................................................................................... 10 2.3.2 Distribution ............................................................................................................. 12 2.3.3 Distribution during Gestation and Lactation........................................................... 13 2.3.4 Metabolism ............................................................................................................. 14 2.3.5 Excretion ................................................................................................................. 14 2.3.6 Pharmacokinetic Clearance and Half-life Data ....................................................... 15 3.0 Problem Formulation ....................................................................................................... 20 3.1 Conceptual Model .......................................................................................................... 20 3.2 Overall Scientific Objectives ......................................................................................... 22 3.3 Methods .......................................................................................................................... 23 3.3.1 Literature Search Strategy and Results ................................................................... 23 3.3.2 Study Screening Process and Study Evaluation...................................................... 24 3.3.3 Approach for Derivation of Reference Values ....................................................... 25 3.3.4 Measures of Effect .................................................................................................. 26 4.0 Study Summaries .............................................................................................................. 27 4.1 Acute Toxicity Studies ................................................................................................... 27 4.2 Short-Term Toxicity Studies .......................................................................................... 29 4.3 Subchronic Toxicity Studies .......................................................................................... 32 4.4 Chronic Toxicity and Carcinogenicity Studies .............................................................. 34 4.5 Reproductive and Developmental Toxicity Studies ....................................................... 37 4.6 Other Studies .................................................................................................................. 40 iii This document is a draft for review purposes only and does not constitute Agency policy. DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE NOVEMBER 2018 4.6.1 Immunotoxicity Studies .......................................................................................... 40 4.6.2 Mechanistic Studies ................................................................................................ 40 4.6.3 Genotoxicity Studies ............................................................................................... 41 4.7 Mode of Action .............................................................................................................. 42 5.0 Summary of Hazard ......................................................................................................... 43 5.1 Hepatic ........................................................................................................................... 43 5.2 Hematological ................................................................................................................ 44 5.3 Renal............................................................................................................................... 45 5.4 Developmental/Reproductive ......................................................................................... 46 5.5 Immune System .............................................................................................................. 46 5.6 Cancer............................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • An Indexing and Classification System for Earth-Science Data Bases
    AN INDEXING AND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR EARTH-SCIENCE DATA BASES By James C. Schornick, Janet B. Pruitt, Helen E. Stranathan, and Albert C. Duncan U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 89 47 Reston, Virginia 1989 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, JR., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report can write to: be purchased from: Assistant Chief Hydrologist for U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Information Management Books and Open-File Reports Section U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center, Building 810 440 National Center Box 25425 Reston, Virginia 22092 Denver, Colorado 80225 CONTENTS Page Abstract ............................................................ 1 Introduction ........................................................ 1 Objective of the indexing and classification system .............. 2 Scope of the indexing and classification system .................. 2 The indexing and classification system .............................. 2 The sample medium component ...................................... 3 The general physical/chemical component .......................... 6 The specific physical/chemical component ......................... 6 Organic substances ............................................ 7 Biological taxa ............................................... 8 The indexing and classification code ............................. 9 Data base availability .............................................. 11 Summary ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Loradchemical.Com Safety Data Sheet 1. Product And
    LORADCHEMICAL.COM ! ! SAFETY DATA SHEET 1. PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION Trade Name: Manganese Dioxide Chemical Formula: MnO2 Manufacturer Item Number: MA-3215 Manufacturer: Lorad Chemical Corporation 1200 19th Street North Saint Petersburg, Florida, 33713 United States of America Telephone: +1 (727) 826–5511 Fax: +1 (727) 826–5510 Emergency Contact: (800) 255–3924 (US & Canada) +1 (813) 248–0573 (International) 2. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION Signal Word: Warning Pictograms: " Hazard Statements: H302 Harmful if swallowed. H319 Causes serious eye irritation. H332 Harmful if inhaled. H335 May cause respiratory irritation. Precautionary Statements: P261 Avoid breathing dust / fumes / gas / mist / vapors / spray. P264 Wash thoroughly after handling. P270 Do not eat drink or smoke when using this product. P271 Use only outdoors or in a well-ventilated area. P301+312 IF SWALLOWED: Call a POISON CENTER or physician if you feel unwell. P304+312+340 IF INHALED: Remove person to fresh air and keep comfortable for breathing. Call a POISON CENTER or physician if you feel unwell. P305+351+338 IF IN EYES: Rinse cautiously with water for several minutes. Remove contact lenses if present and easy to do - continue rinsing. P312 Call a POISON CENTER or physician if you feel unwell. P330 Rinse mouth. P337+313 If eye irritation persists: Get medical advice / attention. P403+233 Store in a well ventilated place. Keep container tightly closed. P405 Store locked up. P501 Dispose of contents / containers in accordance with local / regional / national / international regulations. HMIS Health Ratings (0-4) - Health: 2* - Flammability: 0 - Physical: 0 3. COMPOSITION Additional Names: Manganese(IV) Oxide Page 1! of !5 LORADCHEMICAL.COM ! ! SAFETY DATA SHEET Percentage: 100 wt% CAS #: 1313-13-9 EC #: 215-202-6 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Analytical Methods for Detecting Unknown Chemicals in Recycled Water
    PROJECT NO. 4992 Evaluating Analytical Methods for Detecting Unknown Chemicals in Recycled Water Evaluating Analytical Methods for Detecting Unknown Chemicals in Recycled Water Prepared by: Keith A. Maruya Charles S. Wong Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority 2020 The Water Research Foundation (WRF) is a nonprofit (501c3) organization which provides a unified source for One Water research and a strong presence in relationships with partner organizations, government and regulatory agencies, and Congress. The foundation conducts research in all areas of drinking water, wastewater, stormwater, and water reuse. The Water Research Foundation’s research portfolio is valued at over $700 million. The Foundation plays an important role in the translation and dissemination of applied research, technology demonstration, and education, through creation of research‐based educational tools and technology exchange opportunities. WRF serves as a leader and model for collaboration across the water industry and its materials are used to inform policymakers and the public on the science, economic value, and environmental benefits of using and recovering resources found in water, as well as the feasibility of implementing new technologies. For more information, contact: The Water Research Foundation Alexandria, VA Office Denver, CO Office 1199 North Fairfax Street, Suite 900 6666 West Quincy Avenue Alexandria, VA 22314‐1445 Denver, Colorado 80235‐3098 Tel: 571.384.2100 Tel: 303.347.6100 www.waterrf.org [email protected] ©Copyright 2020 by The Water Research Foundation. All rights reserved. Permission to copy must be obtained from The Water Research Foundation. WRF ISBN: 978‐1‐60573‐503‐0 WRF Project Number: 4992 This report was prepared by the organization(s) named below as an account of work sponsored by The Water Research Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Nitrosamines EMEA-H-A5(3)-1490
    25 June 2020 EMA/369136/2020 Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) Assessment report Procedure under Article 5(3) of Regulation EC (No) 726/2004 Nitrosamine impurities in human medicinal products Procedure number: EMEA/H/A-5(3)/1490 Note: Assessment report as adopted by the CHMP with all information of a commercially confidential nature deleted. Official address Domenico Scarlattilaan 6 ● 1083 HS Amsterdam ● The Netherlands Address for visits and deliveries Refer to www.ema.europa.eu/how-to-find-us Send us a question Go to www.ema.europa.eu/contact Telephone +31 (0)88 781 6000 An agency of the European Union © European Medicines Agency, 2020. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Table of contents Table of contents ...................................................................................... 2 1. Information on the procedure ............................................................... 7 2. Scientific discussion .............................................................................. 7 2.1. Introduction......................................................................................................... 7 2.2. Quality and safety aspects ..................................................................................... 7 2.2.1. Root causes for presence of N-nitrosamines in medicinal products and measures to mitigate them............................................................................................................. 8 2.2.2. Presence and formation of N-nitrosamines
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Innovation Technologies to Make Processes and Products More Sustainable
    United States Government Accountability Office Center for Science, Technology, and Engineering Natural Resources and Environment Report to Congressional Requesters February 2018 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT Chemical Innovation Technologies to Make Processes and Products More Sustainable GAO-18-307 The cover image displays a word cloud generated from the transcript of the meeting we convened with 24 experts in the field of sustainable chemistry. The size of the words in the cloud corresponds to the frequency with which each word appeared in the transcript. In most cases, similar words—such as singular and plural versions of the same word— were combined into a single term. Words that were unrelated to the topic of sustainable chemistry were removed. The images around the periphery are stylized representations of chemical molecules that seek to illustrate a new conceptual framework, whereby molecules can be transformed to provide better performance; however, they are not intended to represent specific chemical compounds. TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT Highlights of GAO-18-307, a report to congressional requesters Chemical Innovation February 2018 Technologies to Make Processes and Products More Sustainable Why GAO did this study What GAO found Chemistry contributes to virtually every Stakeholders lack agreement on how to define sustainable chemistry and how to aspect of modern life and the chemical measure or assess the sustainability of chemical processes and products; these industry supports more than 25 percent differences hinder the development and adoption of more sustainable chemistry of the gross domestic product of the technologies. However, based on a review of the literature and stakeholder United States. While these are positive interviews, GAO identified several common themes underlying what sustainable contributions, chemical production can chemistry strives to achieve, including: have negative health and environmental · improve the efficiency with which natural resources—including energy, consequences.
    [Show full text]
  • Sodium Azide [Sep-100] for Control of Nematodes and Weed Problems in Green Pepper Production R
    SODIUM AZIDE [SEP-100] FOR CONTROL OF NEMATODES AND WEED PROBLEMS IN GREEN PEPPER PRODUCTION R. Rodriguez-Kabana and J. R. Akridge, Auburn University and Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station Auburn, Alabama 36830, U.S.A. [email protected] ABSTRACT The efficacy of SEP-100, a liquid formulation of Na azide, as an alternative for methyl bromide (MB) in soil fumigation was studied in field experiments with ‘Aladdin’ green pepper [Capsicum annum]. Pre-plant applications of SEP-100 by drip irrigation to plastic covered beds at rates of 50, 75, 100, 125, 150, 175, and 200 lbs.a.i./A, were effective in controlling root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita), purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus), and Panicum spp. Na azide rates > 100 lbs /A consistently equaled or outperformed MB (300 lbs/A) in controlling root-knot nematodes and weeds. Total marketable yields, and yields of Fancy, No. 1, and No. 2 peppers increased directly and linearly in relation to SEP 100 doses. MB fumigation resulted in increased marketable yield and increases in weights of all yield categories; however, these responses did not achieve the levels observed for SEP 100 rates > 125 lbs a.i./A. Results indicate that Na azide in the SEP-100 formulation is a practical and safe potential alternative to MB for soil fumigation in green pepper production. Key Words: azides, inorganic azides, herbicide, horticultural crops, hydrazoic acid, methyl bromide alternatives, nematicide, pest management, root-knot nematodes, soil-borne pests, soil fumigation, weed control. INTRODUCTION Green or bell peppers constitute over two-thirds of the total pepper production in North America (Sundstrom, 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • Potassium Sulfite
    Potassium sulfite sc-253311 Material Safety Data Sheet Hazard Alert Code Key: EXTREME HIGH MODERATE LOW Section 1 - CHEMICAL PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION PRODUCT NAME Potassium sulfite STATEMENT OF HAZARDOUS NATURE CONSIDERED A HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE ACCORDING TO OSHA 29 CFR 1910.1200. NFPA FLAMMABILITY0 HEALTH3 HAZARD INSTABILITY1 SUPPLIER Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. 2145 Delaware Avenue Santa Cruz, California 95060 800.457.3801 or 831.457.3800 EMERGENCY ChemWatch Within the US & Canada: 877-715-9305 Outside the US & Canada: +800 2436 2255 (1-800-CHEMCALL) or call +613 9573 3112 SYNONYMS K2-S-O3, "potassium sulphite", "sulfurous acid, dipotassium salt", "sulphurous acid, dipotassium salt" Section 2 - HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION CHEMWATCH HAZARD RATINGS Min Max Flammability: 0 Toxicity: 2 Body Contact: 2 Min/Nil=0 Low=1 Reactivity: 1 Moderate=2 High=3 Chronic: 2 Extreme=4 CANADIAN WHMIS SYMBOLS EMERGENCY OVERVIEW 1 of 10 RISK Contact with acids liberates toxic gas. Irritating to eyes, respiratory system and skin. POTENTIAL HEALTH EFFECTS ACUTE HEALTH EFFECTS SWALLOWED ! Accidental ingestion of the material may be damaging to the health of the individual. ! Ingestion of sulfite salts may cause gastric irritation. Large doses may produce violent colic, diarrhea, circulatory disturbance, depression of vital functions and, sometimes, death. EYE ! This material can cause eye irritation and damage in some persons. SKIN ! This material can cause inflammation of the skin oncontact in some persons. ! The material may accentuate any pre-existing dermatitis condition. ! Skin contact is not thought to have harmful health effects, however the material may still produce health damage following entry through wounds, lesions or abrasions.
    [Show full text]
  • Potentially Explosive Chemicals*
    Potentially Explosive Chemicals* Chemical Name CAS # Not 1,1’-Diazoaminonaphthalene Assigned 1,1-Dinitroethane 000600-40-8 1,2,4-Butanetriol trinitrate 006659-60-5 1,2-Diazidoethane 000629-13-0 1,3,5-trimethyl-2,4,6-trinitrobenzene 000602-96-0 1,3-Diazopropane 005239-06-5 Not 1,3-Dinitro-4,5-dinitrosobenzene Assigned Not 1,3-dinitro-5,5-dimethyl hydantoin Assigned Not 1,4-Dinitro-1,1,4,4-tetramethylolbutanetetranitrate Assigned Not 1,7-Octadiene-3,5-Diyne-1,8-Dimethoxy-9-Octadecynoic acid Assigned 1,8 –dihydroxy 2,4,5,7-tetranitroanthraquinone 000517-92-0 Not 1,9-Dinitroxy pentamethylene-2,4,6,8-tetramine Assigned 1-Bromo-3-nitrobenzene 000585-79-5 Not 2,2',4,4',6,6'-Hexanitro-3,3'-dihydroxyazobenzene Assigned 2,2-di-(4,4,-di-tert-butylperoxycyclohexyl)propane 001705-60-8 2,2-Dinitrostilbene 006275-02-1 2,3,4,6- tetranitrophenol 000641-16-7 Not 2,3,4,6-tetranitrophenyl methyl nitramine Assigned Not 2,3,4,6-tetranitrophenyl nitramine Assigned Not 2,3,5,6- tetranitroso nitrobenzene Assigned Not 2,3,5,6- tetranitroso-1,4-dinitrobenzene Assigned 2,4,6-Trinitro-1,3,5-triazo benzene 029306-57-8 Not 2,4,6-trinitro-1,3-diazabenzene Assigned Not 2,4,6-Trinitrophenyl trimethylol methyl nitramine trinitrate Assigned Not 2,4,6-Trinitroso-3-methyl nitraminoanisole Assigned 2,4-Dinitro-1,3,5-trimethyl-benzene 000608-50-4 2,4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine 000119-26-6 2,4-Dinitroresorcinol 000519-44-8 2,5-dimethyl-2,5-diydroperoxy hexane 2-Nitro-2-methylpropanol nitrate 024884-69-3 3,5-Dinitrosalicylic acid 000609-99-4 Not 3-Azido-1,2-propylene glycol dinitrate
    [Show full text]
  • Chemistry Spellcheck On
    National Qualications 2019 NX813/75/025 Chemistry Section 1 — Questions FRIDAY, 10 MAY 1:00 PM – 3:30 PM Instructions for the completion of Section 1 are given on page 02 of your question and answer booklet X813/75/01. Record your answers on the answer grid on page 03 of your question and answer booklet. You may refer to the Chemistry Data Booklet for National 5. Before leaving the examination room you must give your question and answer booklet to the Invigilator; if you do not, you may lose all the marks for this paper. © *X8137502* A/SA SECTION 1 — 25 marks Attempt ALL questions Questions 1 and 2 refer to an experiment to investigate the rate of a reaction. The volume of gas collected in 2 minutes was 5 cm3. 1. What was the average rate of reaction over this time? A 0·2 B 0·4 C 2·5 D 5·0 2. The unit for the average rate of this reaction is A cm3/min−1 B cm3 min−1 C min/cm3 D min cm−3 3. Tennessine is a newly discovered element with a predicted electron arrangement of 2,8,18,32,32,18,7. In which group of the periodic table should Tennessine be placed? A 1 B 2 C 7 D 8 page 02 4. Which of the following is a positively charged ion? Protons Neutrons Electrons A 9 10 10 B 10 9 10 C 11 12 11 D 12 13 10 5. To turn a gas into a liquid it must be cooled below a temperature known as its critical temperature.
    [Show full text]
  • National 5 Chemistry Unit 1 Practical Skills Past Paper Questions
    National 5 Chemistry Unit 1 Practical Skills Past Paper Questions 1. Oxygen gas A. Burns with a pop B. Relights a glowing splint C. Turns damp pH paper red D. Turns limewater cloudy 2. The diagram below shows what happens when two solutions are mixed. Which of the following terms describe the reaction that has taken place? A. Addition B. Neutralisation C. Precipitation D. Redox 3. The table contains information about calcium and calcium chloride. When molten calcium chloride is electrolysed at 800 ºC the calcium appears as a A. solid on the surface of the molten calcium chloride B. liquid on the surface of the molten calcium chloride C. solid at the bottom of the molten calcium chloride D. liquid at the bottom of the molten calcium chloride. 4. When hydrogen chloride gas is dissolved in water a solution containing hydrogen ions and chloride ions is formed. Which equation correctly shows the state symbols for this change? 5. The spectator ions in the reaction are A. H+ (aq) and K+ (aq) - - B. NO3 (aq) and OH (aq) C. H+(aq) and OH-(aq) + - D. K (aq) and NO3 (aq) 6. Which of the following shows the metals in order of increasing reactivity? A. XYZ B. YXZ C. ZXY D. ZYX 7. Nitrogen dioxide is a brown coloured gas that is soluble in water and more dense than air. Which of the following diagrams shows the most appropriate method for collecting and measuring the volume of nitrogen dioxide? 8. A solution of a metal chloride burns with a green flame.
    [Show full text]
  • SAFETY DATA SHEET Calcium Propionate 1
    Conforms to EU Directive 91/155/EEC, as amended by 2001/58/EC and 2004/73/EC - (Europe) and the ANSI Z400.1 standard - (Americas). SAFETY DATA SHEET Calcium propionate 1. Identification of the substance/preparation and company/undertaking Identification of the substance or preparation Product name : Calcium propionate Chemical name : Propanoic acid, calcium salt Synonyms : Calcium propanoate. Calcium propianate. Propionic acid, calcium salt. Propanoic acid, calcium salt. Chemical formula : C6H10O4.Ca CAS no. : 4075-81-4 EEC # : E-282 EINECS no. : 223-795-8 NAFTA# : 2915.50.1010 Use of the : The major uses of calcium propionate are as a mold inhibitor for baked goods such substance/preparation as bread, processed cheese, tobacco, pharmaceuticals, medecine (anti-funal agent) and animal feed. Also used in butyl rubber to improve processing and heat resistance. Occurs naturally in some cheeses (e.g. Swiss cheese). Company/undertaking identification Manufacturer : Macco Organiques Inc., 100 McArthur, Valleyfield, Qc, Canada, J6S 4M5 Tel: (450) 371-1066 Fax: (450) 371-5519 [email protected] http://www.macco.ca Emergency telephone number : CANUTEC (613) 996-6666 CHEMTREC, U.S. : (800) 424-9300 International: (703) 527-3887 2. Composition/information on ingredients Substance/preparation : Substance: This substance (pure product) is not controlled under the Dangerous Substance Directive in Europe, the Hazard Communication Standard in the United States, and the Workplace Hazardous Material Information System in Canada. Ingredient name * CAS % EC number Classification number Europe See remark below. See section 16 for the full text of the R-phrases declared above United States of America Defined as non-hazardous by OSHA under 29 CFR 1910.1200(d).
    [Show full text]
  • Carboxylic Acids
    13 Carboxylic Acids The active ingredients in these two nonprescription pain relievers are derivatives of arylpropanoic acids. See Chemical Connections 13A, “From Willow Bark to Aspirin and Beyond.” Inset: A model of (S)-ibuprofen. (Charles D. Winters) KEY QUESTIONS 13.1 What Are Carboxylic Acids? HOW TO 13.2 How Are Carboxylic Acids Named? 13.1 How to Predict the Product of a Fischer 13.3 What Are the Physical Properties of Esterification Carboxylic Acids? 13.2 How to Predict the Product of a B-Decarboxylation 13.4 What Are the Acid–Base Properties of Reaction Carboxylic Acids? 13.5 How Are Carboxyl Groups Reduced? CHEMICAL CONNECTIONS 13.6 What Is Fischer Esterification? 13A From Willow Bark to Aspirin and Beyond 13.7 What Are Acid Chlorides? 13B Esters as Flavoring Agents 13.8 What Is Decarboxylation? 13C Ketone Bodies and Diabetes CARBOXYLIC ACIDS ARE another class of organic compounds containing the carbonyl group. Their occurrence in nature is widespread, and they are important components of foodstuffs such as vinegar, butter, and vegetable oils. The most important chemical property of carboxylic acids is their acidity. Furthermore, carboxylic acids form numerous important derivatives, including es- ters, amides, anhydrides, and acid halides. In this chapter, we study carboxylic acids themselves; in Chapters 14 and 15, we study their derivatives. 457 458 CHAPTER 13 Carboxylic Acids 13.1 What Are Carboxylic Acids? Carboxyl group A J COOH The functional group of a carboxylic acid is a carboxyl group, so named because it is made group. up of a carbonyl group and a hydroxyl group (Section 1.7D).
    [Show full text]