I Am Now Able to Provide You with a Response to Your Enquiry About Extradition Requests Made by the Russian Federation to the UK

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

I am now able to provide you with a response to your enquiry about extradition requests made by the Russian Federation to the UK. I am able to give you the details of requests made by the Russian Federation to England and Wales in the last six years. Details of any requests, if any, made to the authorities in Scotland and Northern Ireland are a matter for the Scotland Office and Northern Ireland Office respectively. The table below sets out the requests made to date which have entered the public domain through an arrest for extradition having been made (the effective date of request being taken as the date of arrest): Year Name Basis for request Status of request of Arrest 2001 Sergei Uraganov Grievous Bodily Surrender ordered but Harm absconded – Uraganov later found in another country and request withdrawn by Russia 2002 Akhmed Zakayev Levying war in Discharged by District Chechnya, murder Judge on the basis that etc. Zakaev’s human rights might be infringed 2003 Boris Berezovsky Fraud Discharged by District Judge on the basis of Berezovsky’s immigration status Year Name Basis for request Status of request 2003 Yuri Dubov Fraud Discharged by District Judge on the basis of Dubov’s immigration status 2004 Natalia Fraud Discharged by District Chernysheva Judge as politically motivated 2004 Dmitry Maruev Fraud Discharged by District Judge as politically motivated 2004 Alexander Fraud Discharged by District Gorbachev Judge as politically motivated 2005 Ramil Bourganov Fraud Discharged by District Judge on the basis of Bourganov’s immigration status 2005 Aleksandr Conspiracy to steal Discharged by District Temerko Judge as politically motivated 2006 No arrests to date. No proceedings are outstanding on the above cases. We cannot confirm or deny whether we hold material in relation to any extradition request from any country in which an arrest has not taken place, by virtue of Section 31(3) of the Freedom of Information Act, where disclosure of information would, or would be likely to prejudice the apprehension or prosecution of offenders; or to prejudice the administration of justice. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL PRESS RELEASE News Flash
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL PRESS RELEASE News Flash AI Index: EUR 46/001/2005 (Public) News Service No: 017 20 January 2005 Russian Federation: Human rights group threatened by security forces Amnesty International is extremely concerned that eight activists working for the human rights group the Russian-Chechen Friendship Society are in danger of being arbitrarily arrested, tortured and "disappeared". This follows the seizure today of their contact information by Russian security forces. Officers from the Federal Security Service (FSB) raided the organisation's offices in Nizhny Novgorod at about 5pm local time and seized documents containing the contact details of all the staff of the group's newspaper. The contact details of eight staff members living in Chechnya were among those seized. The security forces also took away the newspaper's registration documents and some editions of the newspaper. Earlier in the day, the regional branch of the FSB in Nizhny Novgorod summoned Stanislav Dmitrievskii, the head of the Russian-Chechen Friendship Society for questioning. The FSB reportedly considers Stanislav Dmitrievskii a witness in a criminal case relating to materials published by the organization’s newspaper Pravozashchita. Details of the case are unclear but seem to relate to statements by Chechen opposition figures including Aslan Maskhadov and his UK-based envoy Akhmed Zakayev published by the organization’s newspaper. Amnesty International has reported on a worrying trend of Russian authorities targeting human rights defenders, activists and independent journalists, and in some cases subjecting them to extreme levels of harassment, "disappearances" and killings. Public Document **************************************** For more information please call Amnesty International's press office in London, UK, on +44 20 7413 5566 Amnesty International, 1 Easton St., London WC1X 0DW.
[Show full text]
The War in Chechnya and Its Aftermath
Baylis, Wirtz & Gray: Strategy in the Contemporary World 6e Holding a Decaying Empire Together: The War in Chechnya and its Aftermath On 25 December 1991, the Soviet Union officially was dissolved, with the former superpower splitting into 15 individual states. Each of these entities had been a constituent ‘republic’ of the USSR built around one of the major ethnicities within the country—Russia itself was dominated by Russians, Ukraine by Ukrainians, and so forth. The 15 republics, however, actually greatly simplified the diversity of the Soviet state, which contained hundreds of distinct ethnic groups, many of which dominated a small piece of territory within a republic. In many cases, these groups had certain limited rights to govern themselves locally and independently of the larger republic of which they were a part. The Chechens were one such group. Chechnya is located in Russia, in the mountainous Caucasus and bordering the now-independent country of Georgia. The total number of Chechens is small, although exact numbers are disputed—there are perhaps somewhat over two million Chechens, many of whom live outside Chechnya itself; the population of Chechnya itself is approximately 1.2 million, but this includes Ingush, Kumyks, Russians, and other non-Chechens. The great majority of Chechens are Muslims, and although Chechnya was incorporated into the Russian Empire in the nineteenth century (and Russia had influence in the region much earlier), their culture remains quite distinct from that of the Russians. During the Soviet period, Chechens were joined with another small Caucasian Muslim group, the Ingush, in a local governing entity.
[Show full text]
News from Copenhagen
News from Copenhagen Updates from the OSCE PA International Secretariat 7 October 2020 | Number 809 PA’s Cardin and Zannier speak at HCNM event on policing in diverse societies Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), Washington Bureau, Senior Vice President for Advocacy and Policy. In his remarks, Cardin spoke about his work as Special Repre- sentative to advance racial equality and stressed that police of- ficers must be held accountable when they use excessive force. He discussed legislation he is promoting to advance justice in policing in the United States, including banning the use of choke- holds and “no-knock” warrants, as well as demilitarizing police forces. The Special Representative also spoke about challenges facing minorities in Europe, particularly Roma and Sinti, stressing that more must be done to protect the human rights of people around the OSCE region. Zannier, who previously served as OSCE Secretary General Ben Cardin speaks at HCNM event on 6 October. and as HCNM and is now a consultant with the OSCE PA, high- lighted a number of OSCE PA resolutions addressing issues of SCE PA Special Representative on Anti-Semitism, Racism, policing in diverse societies, police brutality and racial discrimina- Oand Intolerance Ben Cardin (United States) and High-Level tion. He also pointed out that it is important to find ways to extend Expert Lamberto Zannier joined the Office of the OSCE High recommendations of the HCNM, which tend to focus on specific Commissioner on National Minorities for an online event Tuesday issues of national minorities, to issues facing diverse societies to discuss challenges related to policing in the OSCE area.
[Show full text]
Russian Analytical Digest No 5
No. 5 29 August 2006 rrussianussian aanalyticalnalytical ddigestigest www.res.ethz.ch www.russlandanalysen.de BESLAN – TWO YEARS AFTER ■ ANALYSIS Looking Back at Beslan. Alexander Cherkasov, Moscow 2 ■ ANALYSIS Th e North Caucasus: Taking stock two years after Beslan. Jeronim Perovic, Zurich 4 ■ TABLES AND DIAGRAMS Th e North Caucasus and the Southern Federal District: Statistics and Facts 9 ■ OPINION SURVEY Th e North Caucasus in Russian Eyes 13 ■ CHRONOLOGY Terror-related incidents in the North Caucasus September 2004 – August 2006 14 Research Centre for East CSS Center for Security Otto Wolff -Stiftung DGO European Studies, Bremen An ETH Center Studies, ETH Zurich rrussianussian aanalyticalnalytical russian analytical digest 05/06 ddigestigest Analysis Looking Back at Beslan Alexander Cherkasov, Moscow Summary Two years after the Beslan tragedy, the authorities have yet to publish a fi nal report on what took place there. Most importantly, they have refused to examine the terrorist attack within the larger context of the Chechen war. Th ey have also blamed all the deaths on the terrorists, preventing a thorough investigation examining the role of the Russian security forces and the responsibilities of the authorities. Such a study would make possible a more nuanced understanding of what happened at Beslan. Hostage-taking tragedies: Moscow’s terrorists prepare and carry out their plans? Which questionable approach administrative and law enforcement offi cials were uring the course of the Chechen wars over the responsible for this?” Th ose questions are suitable for Dlast 12 years, Beslan was the fourth large-scale prosecutors. In the wider sense, we need to address terrorist act with the taking of hostages in Russia.
[Show full text]
Mr Akhmed Zakayev, Vice-President of the Elected Government of Chechnya, in Copenhagen, Where He Had Been Sent on Official Business by President Maskhadov
C 155 E/114 Official Journal of the European Union EN 3.7.2003 Mr Akhmed Zakayev, Vice-President of the elected government of Chechnya, in Copenhagen, where he had been sent on official business by President Maskhadov. Coming on the heels of the barbaric action against the hostages in Moscow and the hundreds of lives which it claimed, this unprecedented measure is the latest excess in the record of President Putin, whose attitude is part and parcel of a growing tendency worldwide to use the fight against terrorism as a pretext for overriding respect for human life which is increasingly assuming the features of a new and dangerous form of militarist fascism that refuses to acknowledge human rights and fundamental freedoms. Can the Council state whether any remotely legitimate grounds exist permitting a government occupying the EU Presidency to arrest the Vice-President of a government such as that of Chechnya, democratically elected in a small country which is fighting for its independence? Reply (20 February 2003) This matter is a subject for the judicial authorities of Denmark. For this reason, it is not appropriate for the Council to make any comment whatsoever upon it. (2003/C 155 E/124) WRITTEN QUESTION E-3222/02 by Eija-Riitta Korhola (PPE-DE) to the Council (14 November 2002) Subject: Accession countries and volume of ‘hot air’ Is there an estimate on how big a volume of so-called ‘hot air’ is possessed by the 10 (and later 12) new Member States during the initial period of the EU emission trading scheme (2005-2007) or the subsequent
[Show full text]
Stability in Russia's Chechnya and Other Regions of the North Caucasus: Recent Developments
Stability in Russia’s Chechnya and Other Regions of the North Caucasus: Recent Developments Jim Nichol Specialist in Russian and Eurasian Affairs December 13, 2010 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL34613 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Stability in Russia’s Chechnya and Other Regions of the North Caucasus Summary Terrorist attacks in Russia’s North Caucasus—a border area between the Black and Caspian Seas that includes the formerly breakaway Chechnya and other ethnic-based regions—appeared to increase substantially in 2007-2009. Moreover, civilian and government casualties reached levels not seen in several years and terrorist attacks again took place outside the North Caucasus. Although the number of terrorist incidents may have leveled off or even declined slightly in 2010 from the high levels of 2009, the rate of civilian and government casualties continued to increase throughout the North Caucasus in 2010 and a rising number of terrorist incidents took place outside of Chechnya. Illustrative of the new range and scope of violence, the Moscow subway system was bombed in March 2010, resulting in over 40 deaths and dozens of injuries. Before the recent rise in terrorism, it seemed that government security forces had been successful in tamping down their range and scope by aggressively carrying out over a thousand sweep operations (“zachistki”) in the North Caucasus. During these operations, security forces surround a village and search the homes of the residents, ostensibly in a bid to apprehend terrorists. Critics of the operations allege that the searches are illegal and that troops frequently engage in pillaging and gratuitous violence and are responsible for kidnapping for ransom and “disappearances” of civilians.
[Show full text]
Chechnya – War and History 400 Years of Colonial Conquest – 400 Years of Resistance
Ekkehard Maaß | Bettina Kubanek Chechnya War and History 400 Years of Colonial Conquest – 400 Years of Resistance This exhibition was produced by the German-Caucasian Society An old Chechen legend A long, long time ago there was a violent storm. It plucked trees by their roots, caused rivers and seas to burst their banks and razed mountains flat. It was so violent that all living beings fled before it. None resis- ted but a lone wolf, who stood fast on all four legs to spite the storm. The storm grew angry, tearing the wolf’s hide from his body in tatters and biting him until his blood ran, and yet the wolf would not flinch from where he stood… for he had no other home but this and refused to abandon it, however great the misfortune that befell it. Chechnya – War and History 400 Years of Colonial Conquest – 400 Years of Resistance When Chechnya left the Soviet Union in 1991 to declare independence, its prospects were just as real as those of former Soviet republics in the Baltic, South Caucasus and Asia. Never did the Chechens imagine that their country would be totally destroyed by air raids and artillery fire during two Russian wars while Western democracies, for the most part, stood by. 200,000 dead, the plight of refugees, concentration camps, purges and cruel torture have uprooted Chechen society and driven people to a despair that makes them increasingly unpredictable. The spread of the conflict throughout the North Caucasus and its devastat- ing impact on Russian society itself should be a cause for deep concern among the governments of Europe.
[Show full text]
"Ethnic War, Holy War, War O' War: Does the Adjective Matter In
University of California, Berkeley Ethnic War, Holy War, War O’ War: Does the Adjective Matter in Explaining Collective Political Violence? Edward W. Walker Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies Working Paper Series This PDF document preserves the page numbering of the printed version for accuracy of citation. When viewed with Acrobat Reader, the printed page numbers will not correspond with the electronic numbering. The Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies (BPS) is a leading center for graduate training on the Soviet Union and its successor states in the United States. Founded in 1983 as part of a nationwide effort to reinvigorate the field, BPS’s mission has been to train a new cohort of scholars and professionals in both cross-disciplinary social science methodology and theory as well as the history, languages, and cultures of the former Soviet Union; to carry out an innovative program of scholarly research and publication on the Soviet Union and its successor states; and to undertake an active public outreach program for the local community, other national and international academic centers, and the U.S. and other governments. Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies University of California, Berkeley Institute of Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies 260 Stephens Hall #2304 Berkeley, California 94720-2304 Tel: (510) 643-6737 [email protected] http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~bsp/ Ethnic War, Holy War, War O’ War: Does the Adjective Matter in Explaining Collective Political Violence? Edward W. Walker Spring 2006 Edward W. Walker is Executive Director of the Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies and Adjunct Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of California, Berkeley.
[Show full text]
International Arctic Petroleum Cooperation Barents Sea Scenarios
International Arctic Petroleum Cooperation Barents Sea scenarios Edited by Anatoli Bourmistrov, Frode Mellemvik, Alexei Bambulyak, Ove Gudmestad, Indra Overland and Anatoly Zolotukhin First published 2015 ISBN: 978-1-138-78326-3 (hbk) ISBN: 978-1-315-76876-2 (ebk) Chapter 6 Norwegian–Russian political relations and Barents oil and gas developments Indra Overland and Andrey Krivorotov (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) 6 Norwegian–Russian political relations and Barents oil and gas developments Indra Overland and Andrey Krivorotov Introduction The political relationship between Norway and Russia will influence the devel- opment of Barents Sea oil and gas. The state plays a decisive role in both the Norwegian and Russian parts of the sea. It does so as a regulator, through taxa- tion, and through the national oil and gas companies, Gazprom, Rosneft, and Statoil. Thus, if the two states have a good relationship characterized by mutual trust, they can coordinate, search for complementarities, and mitigate issues that arise. Furthermore, due to the rising cost of oil and gas production in the Arctic, many oil and gas fields there may deliver small returns on investments. Scale economies brought about by coordinated development, joint infrastruc- ture, and information sharing can tip projects from being commercially unvi- able to viable. But this depends on the ability and willingness of the two states to actively work together. It is commonly noted that Norway and Russia have been at peace for over 1,000 years (e.g. Støre, 2010). At the end of World War II, North Norway was liberated from Nazi occupation by Soviet forces.
[Show full text]
Counter-Terrorism and Human Rights – Is the EU on the Right Course?
Counter-terrorism and human rights – is the EU on the right course? Dick Leonard The EU responded with commendable – if unusual – alacrity to the worldwide terrorist threat unleashed on 11 September 2001. Within five weeks, it had agreed on a wide range of measures, including notably the introduction of a European Arrest Warrant, designed to beef up counter- terrorism on a Europe-wide basis, without infringing the human rights commitments supposedly assured within its “area of freedom, security and justice”. Now, nearly four years later, Amnesty International has produced a disturbing report questioning how far this objective has been met. Entitled Human Rights Dissolving at the Borders? Counter-terrorism and EU Criminal Law, it addresses three fundamental issues, as well as listing a whole series of detailed shortcomings. The first fundamental error, the report suggests, is the failure to agree on a precise definition of terrorism as a basis for framing EU law. It cites with approval the following wordage proposed by a high-level UN panel: Any action constitutes terrorism if it is intended to cause death or serious bodily harm to civilians or non-combatants with the purpose of intimidating a population or compelling a government or an international organisation to do or abstain from doing any act. By contrast, the EU framework decision on combating terrorism, adopted in December 2001, is a lengthy and verbose document, greatly extending the notion of terrorism beyond actual violent acts designed to cause death or serious bodily harm or attempts at such acts. The consequence has been the adoption in several member states of vaguely worded laws, opening the possibility that they may be utilised against non-violent dissenters as well as those who offer a serious threat to security.
[Show full text]
Khasavyurt Accord Background Paper
KA Khasavyurt Accord Committee: Khasavyurt Accord Situation: The Chechen-Russian Conflict (December 1994-August 1996) Written By: Romina Pérez I. Specialized Committee A specialized committee focuses on a specific situation, rather than broad themes or topics. A specialized committee is often categorized by its own protocol and is usually unique to every simulation. Participants in a specialized committee will have very specific roles and are encouraged to study a single person’s point of view on the assigned situation, rather than a whole country’s general point of view. During ISRMUN, participants in the Khasavyurt Accord are referred to as representatives. These participants represent a member of the Russian or Chechen government during the Chechen-Russian Conflict between December 1994 and August 1996. Moreover, specialized committees are recognized for being relatively small, which allows the debate to flow smoothly, as there are only a few participants debating or discussing ideas. It is important to note that specialized committees can be significantly more challenging than regular committees, and require a more thorough research process. II. Quorum Chechens • Akhmed Zakayev • Aslan Maskhadov • Dokka Umarov • Dzhokhar Dudayev • Salman Raduyev • Vakha Arsanov • Zelimkhan Yandarbiyev Russians • Alexander Lebed • Anatoly Kulikov • Boris Yeltsin • Lev Rokhlin • Pavel Grachev • Viktor Chernomyrdin • Vladimir Shamanov III. The Situation A. Background on the Topic The Chechen–Russian conflict is an ongoing, centuries-long dispute over religious freedom, self-determination and cultural preservation. The Chechens are a Northeast Caucasian ethnic group native to the North Caucasus in Eastern Europe. The majority of Chechens are Muslims and live in the Checheno-Ingush Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republica (also known as Chechnya), an autonomous republic within the Soviet Union.
[Show full text]
The North Caucasus on the Brink
IntERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND SECURITY NETWORK THE NORTH CAUCASUS ON THE BRINK Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich IntERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND SECURITY NETWORK THE NORTH CAUCASUS ON THE BRINK Jeronim Perovic Senior Researcher Center for Security Studies, ETH Zurich TABLE OF CONTEntS Summary ..........................................................................................................................4 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 6 Peoples, Territory and Languages .................................................................................7 A History of Violence ....................................................................................................10 The Chechen Factor and the Spread of War ...............................................................13 The North Caucasus as a Conflict Zone ...................................................................... 16 The Dagestani Theater of War .................................................................................... 18 Moscow’s Assessment of the Situation ..................................................................... 19 Cadre Policy and Territorial Reorganization ............................................................. 20 Military Build-Up and a New Policy on Islam ............................................................22 The Consequences of “Chechenization” ....................................................................24
[Show full text]