DOCSLIB.ORG

Top 50 Companies Article Pack a Year of Surprises Shakes up Industry Top 10 Sandoz, Mylan and Teva Switch Places at the Top

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Top 50 Companies Article Pack a Year of Surprises Shakes up Industry Top 10 Sandoz, Mylan and Teva Switch Places at the Top Top 50 Companies Article Pack A Year Of Surprises Shakes Up Industry Top 10 Sandoz, Mylan And Teva Switch Places At The Top Executive Summary but has vaulted to the top of our sales rankings, In an eventful year for the off-patent industry, the with its $9.37bn total for the combined generics, world’s leading generics and biosimilars players biosimilars, active pharmaceutical ingredients and have switched places in Generics Bulletin’s newly- OTC category narrowly exceeding that of Mylan, compiled global sales ranking. despite the Novartis unit seeing a 1% drop in turnover in 2019. Mylan Prepares For Viatris Merger After a year that has seen major changes for some While Mylan’s total company sales in 2019 grew by of the biggest players in the global off-patent 1% to $11.5bn, our ranking excludes from the key industry, it is perhaps no surprise that Generics category around $1.8bn of Mylan’s turnover from Bulletin’s annual ranking of the world’s top 50 respiratory and allergy brands such as EpiPen generics and biosimilars companies has reflected (epinephrine), Perforomist (formoterol) and Tobi this upheaval. (tobramycin). This year, our annual ranking of the top 50 Mylan was also a firm with very different generics and biosimilars companies is being expectations hanging over it midway through presented in three parts, and our initial look at the last year, with investors keenly anticipating the top 10 companies paints a picture that looks quite firm’s long-trailed management announcement different to the predictions that may have been of restructuring plans expected to revitalize made by industry onlookers just 12 months ago. the company. But eventually the firm revealed significantly more far-reaching change, in the form Last year, Mylan topped our table, followed by of a merger with Pfizer’s Upjohn off-patent unit Sandoz and Teva. (Also see “Global Top Three that promises to dramatically remould Mylan’s Trade Places As Going Gets Tough, Especially business model when the two businesses join In The US” - Generics Bulletin, 22 Jul, 2019.) At together to become Viatris. (Also see “Pfizer To the time, we predicted that Sandoz would slip Merge Off-Patent Business With Mylan” - Generics down the table in future due to its deal to divest Bulletin, 29 Jul, 2019.) a large chunk of its business – in the form of its US solid-dose and dermatology units – to India’s Although the close of the Upjohn merger has Aurobindo. been pushed back to the second half of this year and had no effect on Mylan’s 2019 figures, the However, while that deal had been expected to expected successful completion of the deal – close by the end of 2019, it was pushed back and which Mylan recently insisted was still on track, eventually fell apart altogether. (Also see “Sandoz with both it and Pfizer “highly focused on bringing And Aurobindo Cancel US Deal” - Generics this transaction to a successful close” (Also see Bulletin, 2 Apr, 2020.) As a result, Sandoz has “Mylan Sees COVID-19 Impact On Sales” - Generics not only maintained its position in the top three Bulletin, 11 Aug, 2020.) – promises to leave 2 / September 2020 © Informa UK Ltd 2020 (Unauthorized photocopying prohibited.) the company in a very different position when US. (Also see “Teva Emerges From Restructuring Generics Bulletin compiles its industry rankings Ready To Grow” - Generics Bulletin, 20 Feb, 2020.) again in a year’s time. The firm is also focusing on brands such as Ajovy (fremanezumab) and Austedo (deutetrabenazine) Sandoz and Mylan’s leading positions in our as major growth drivers, especially as Copaxone rankings this year come at the expense of Teva, (glatiramer) sales continue to atrophy in the face which remains in third place after seeing its group of global generic competition. sales drop by 8% to $16.89bn with its generics, biosimilars, APIs and OTC figure making up Like many other major operators in the US, $9.33bn. Teva also continues to operate in the shadow of ongoing industry-wide price-fixing allegations, Teva president and CEO Kåre Schultz had been with litigation involving the Israeli firm recently clear that the firm expected 2019 to represent chosen as a “bellwether” case. (Also see “Teva “the bottom of the trough” for the company’s sales Chosen As ‘Bellwether’ In US Price-Fixing and earnings, as it emerges from a years-long Litigation” - Generics Bulletin, 15 Jul, 2020.) period of upheaval in the form of a restructuring Sandoz, on the other hand, reached a $195m deal program that has seen it shed thousands of with the US Department of Justice earlier in the staff, shutter more than 20 manufacturing sites year. (Also see “Sandoz Strikes $195m Deal On US and prune its product portfolio, especially in the Price-Fixing” - Generics Bulletin, 3 Mar, 2020.) Sandoz Mylan Teva Pfizer Sterile Injectables and Biosimilars Perrigo Sun Pharma Fresenius Kabi Aurobindo Shanghai Fosun Stada 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10 000 12 000 14 000 16 000 Generics/Biosimilars/API’s/OTC ($m) Prescription Brands ($m) Other ($m) 3 / September 2020 © Informa UK Ltd 2020 (Unauthorized photocopying prohibited.) Working down our top 10 list, we see Pfizer no investigations relating to its Taro subsidiary. (Also longer listed under the banner of Pfizer Essential see “Sun Loses Shine Amid Testing Times In US” - Health – after the company reorganized its Generics Bulletin, 4 Aug, 2020.) reporting structure in 2019, eliminating this grouping – but instead ranked according to its And Fresenius Kabi ranked in seventh position combined sterile injectables and biosimilars this year thanks to its large intravenous portfolio, business, much of which was inherited from the even as it recently conceded that its biosimilars legacy Hospira unit. The figure of just under $6bn business had been slower off the mark than includes a significant portion of biosimilars sales it had expected. (Also see “Fresenius Kabi’s that are likely to top $1bn in 2020 after reaching EU Biosimilars ‘Lagging Behind Expectations’” $911m in 2019. (Also see “Oncology Aids Pfizer - Generics Bulletin, 4 Aug, 2020.) Aurobindo, As Biosimilars Track To $1bn In 2020” - Generics meanwhile, has climbed up the rankings from Bulletin, 29 Jul, 2020.) tenth to eighth position despite the collapse of its deal with Sandoz that would have likely propelled As major firms like Sandoz, Mylan and Teva do not it even higher. The Indian company enjoyed typically split out sales of OTC products separately growth of almost a fifth in its financial year ended from their generics offerings, our ranking includes March 2020. include OTC products alongside prescription generics and biosimilars. This means that Perrigo’s Rounding out the top ten are China’s Shanghai extensive range of consumer healthcare products Fosun – that saw 15% growth to more than $3bn – many of which are approved through the generic for its pharmaceuticals unit – and Germany’s abbreviated new drug application pathway in Stada, which saw a group increase of 12% to the US – puts it squarely in the top ten when $2.92bn in the wake of an acquisition spree in combined with the Prescription Pharma unit that 2019. The firm’s generics, biosimilars, APIs and it is considering selling or spinning off. OTC figure of $2.75bn excludes its branded products Apo-Go (apomorphine) and value-added This year, Perrigo’s figure comprised $967m from bortezomib that together accounted for $171m in Prescription Pharma, $2.49bn from Consumer 2019. Self-Care Americas and $1.38bn from Consumer Healthcare International. The firm is taking its Ranking Focuses On Generics And Biosimilars time to secure adequate value for the Prescription Interests unit but says the recent sale of its UK-based Our top 50 ranking compiles sales data for 2019 Rosemont Pharmaceuticals liquid generics – or the closest available reported year – for business proves that attractive multiples are those firms for which generics and/or biosimilars still out there in the generics space. (Also see is a major part of their business. This excludes “Rosemont Deal Shows Value Is Out There For US companies predominantly focused on APIs, some Exit, Perrigo Says” - Generics Bulletin, 6 Aug, 2020.) of which report sales totals that would otherwise be sufficient to be featured in the list. Sun Pharma’s business enjoyed double-digit growth in 2019, although the Indian company It also means that firms such as Biogen – which has been weighed down recently by a costly markets biosimilars through its Samsung Bioepis settlement connected to the US price-fixing joint venture – and Eli Lilly with its Basaglar follow- 4 / September 2020 © Informa UK Ltd 2020 (Unauthorized photocopying prohibited.) on insulin glargine brand – are not included, even Pharmaceuticals unit encompassing branded though these figures would again be enough to generics operations in emerging markets is not in otherwise put them in contention. the list. We also do not include companies that do not disclose detailed sales information, although Also excluded are companies that do not split out Generics Bulletin has made efforts to reach out generics, biosimilars, APIs and OTC sales from to major companies in the sector to ensure as larger units housing mature, often off-patent comprehensive a comparison as possible. brands. For this reason, Abbott and its Established 5 / September 2020 © Informa UK Ltd 2020 (Unauthorized photocopying prohibited.) Major Players Swap Positions Among Industry Top 50 Key Developments Lead To Ups And Downs In The Middle Of Our Ranking Executive Summary top 10, includes Dr Reddy’s, which climbed above The second part of Generics Bulletin’s newly- rivals Lupin, Intas – including its Accord business compiled global sales ranking of generics and – and Hikma from 15th place last year to 12th biosimilars companies sees a number of major this year, thanks in part to Dr Reddy’s substantial firms sliding up and down the table.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Understanding the FTC's Monetary Equitable Remedies Under Section
    Understanding the FTC’s monetary equitable remedies under Section 13(b) for antitrust violations By Gerald A. Stein, American Bar Association — Fall 2019 Until recently the Federal Trade Commission’s ability to seek monetary equitable remedies (particularly disgorgement and restitution) for alleged antitrust violations— whether ongoing, impending, or stale— went virtually unchallenged. After it first gained statutory authority under Section 13(b)1 of the FTC Act to bring suit in federal district court to preliminarily enjoin conduct that “is violating, or is about to violate” the antitrust laws, the FTC successfully convinced many federal courts that Section 13(b) also impliedly allowed the FTC to seek standalone permanent injunctions and monetary equitable remedies regardless of whether a defendant’s alleged anticompetitive conduct was ongoing or completed long ago.2 The FTC brought few antitrust cases in the years following the enactment for alleged antitrust violations pursuant to Section 13(b) where the alleged of Section 13(b) in 1973, and the agency formalized its conservative anticompetitive conduct was neither ongoing nor imminent. Next, in approach in its unanimously approved 2003 Policy Statement on Monetary FTC v. Credit Bureau Center LLC,5 the Seventh Circuit vacated an award for Equitable Remedies in Competition Cases. In 2012, however, the FTC restitution in a consumer protection case based on its determination that abruptly, and without providing an opportunity for public comment, Section 13(b) authorizes only restraining orders and injunctions. And, in a withdrew its 2003 Policy Statement, asserting that it created “an overly third case that is still pending, FTC v.
    [Show full text]
  • Responding to Mylan's Inadequate Tender Offer
    Responding To Mylan’s Inadequate Tender Offer: Perrigo’s Board Recommends That You Reject the Offer and Do Not Tender September 2015 Important Information Forward Looking Statements Certain statements in this presentation are forward-looking statements. These statements relate to future events or the Company’s future financial performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements of the Company or its industry to be materially different from those expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “would,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential” or other comparable terminology. The Company has based these forward-looking statements on its current expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections. While the Company believes these expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections are reasonable, such forward-looking statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the Company’s control, including future actions that may be taken by Mylan in furtherance of its unsolicited offer. These and other important factors, including those discussed under “Risk Factors” in the Perrigo Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended June 27, 2015, as well as the Company’s subsequent filings with the Securities and Exchange
    [Show full text]
  • AMGEN INC. V. SANOFI
    Case: 20-1074 Document: 159 Page: 1 Filed: 06/21/2021 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ AMGEN INC., AMGEN MANUFACTURING, LIMITED, AMGEN USA, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. SANOFI, AVENTISUB LLC, FKA AVENTIS PHARMACEUTICALS INC., REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2020-1074 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in Nos. 1:14-cv-01317-RGA, 1:14-cv- 01349-RGA, 1:14-cv-01393-RGA, 1:14-cv-01414-RGA, Judge Richard G. Andrews. ______________________ JEFFREY A. LAMKEN, MoloLamken LLP, Washington, DC, filed a petition for rehearing en banc for plaintiffs-ap- pellants. Also represented by SARAH JUSTINE NEWMAN, MICHAEL GREGORY PATTILLO, JR.; SARA MARGOLIS, New York, NY; EMILY JOHNSON, ERICA S. OLSON, STEVEN TANG, STUART WATT, WENDY A. WHITEFORD, Amgen Inc., Thou- sand Oaks, CA; KEITH HUMMEL, Cravath Swaine & Moore LLP, New York, NY; WILLIAM G. GAEDE, III, McDermott Case: 20-1074 Document: 159 Page: 2 Filed: 06/21/2021 2 AMGEN INC. v. SANOFI Will & Emery LLP, Menlo Park, CA; CHRISTOPHER B. MEAD, Schertler Onorato Mead & Sears LLP, Washington, DC; JAMES L. HIGGINS, MELANIE K. SHARP, Young, Cona- way, Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE. Plaintiff- appellant Amgen Inc. also represented by SARAH CHAPIN COLUMBIA, McDermott, Will & Emery LLP, Boston, MA; LAUREN MARTIN, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, Boston, MA. MATTHEW WOLF, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Washington, DC, filed a response for defendants-appellees. Also represented by VICTORIA REINES; DAVID K. BARR, DANIEL REISNER, New York, NY; DEBORAH E.
    [Show full text]
  • Q1 Pharma Sector Snapshot
    SPECIALTY & GENERIC PHARMA Q1 2021 Report Market Commentary – Debt Capital Markets Debt Markets ▪ 2020 saw increased amounts of debt used in buyouts across the board, resulting in the highest debt / EBITDA Median US Buyout Multiples levels since 2014 − The increased use of debt was driven by 2H20 back- end loaded lending activity (primarily 4Q20) as 16.0x 12.7x 14.1x 12.2x 12.0x 11.6x 11.5x certainty around the U.S. election and vaccination 11.1x 10.0x 9.8x 12.0x 9.7x expectations increased 9.4x 8.6x 8.3x 8.2x 7.5x 7.8x 5.2x 6.7x 5.7x 5.6x ▪ 8.0x 5.9x As the effects of COVID now begin to diminish, debt 5.4x 4.4x 4.1x 3.7x 4.6x 4.3x 3.8x markets have seemingly recovered, signaling that 3.6x lenders have become increasingly comfortable with 4.0x 4.3x 6.9x 6.5x 6.3x 6.0x 5.9x 5.7x 5.7x 5.7x 5.7x 5.6x 5.3x 4.5x 4.4x macroeconomic and company-specific fundamentals 4.3x 0.0x 3.2x − With increased confidence, lenders are currently looking to provide strong leverage for high-quality assets, particularly ones that have proven their Debt/EBITDA Equity/EBITDA EV/EBITDA stability through the recent market downturn Source: PitchBook ▪ The spread on U.S. high-yield debt has returned to pre- Historical US High Yield Debt Effective Yield COVID levels − 4.22% current effective yield compared with a 12.0% 11.4% 11.38% effective yield on March 23, 2020 (peak of the pandemic) 9.0% ▪ We expect increased activity by lenders in 2021 due to: 6.0% 4.2% − Pent-up demand in M&A activity driven by the impact of COVID 3.0% − Limited Partner agreements and investor
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Annual Report Products
    Products 2020 Annual Report From the CEO Dear Fellow Shareholders, Perrigo’s transformation to a pure-play Consumer Self-Care Company has come a long way LQMXVWWZRVKRUW\HDUV:HKDYHUHVWRUHGVXVWDLQDEOHWRSOLQHJURZWKGHOLYHUHGRQRXU¿QDQFLDO SURPLVHVUHFRQ¿JXUHGRXUSRUWIROLRRIEXVLQHVVHVXSGDWHGWKH,7LQIUDVWUXFWXUHDQGSURFHVVHV of the Company, expanded capacity, upgraded leadership talent, installed business intelligence capabilities, built a new product pipeline of over $500 million and re-instilled a sense of pride and energy among our 11,000 team members. Making this even more remarkable, is that we kept the WUDQVIRUPDWLRQRQWUDFNLQWKHIDFHRIWKHJOREDO&29,'SDQGHPLF,KRSH\RXDUHDVSURXGRI3HUULJR¶VJOREDOWHDP DV,DPIRUKRZWKH\ZRUNHGWRNHHSHDFKRWKHUVDIHNHSWRXUHVVHQWLDOSURGXFWVÀRZLQJDQGNHSWRXUWUDQVIRUPDWLRQ to a consumer self-care company on track through all of the personal and professional uncertainty that came their way LQ7KH\DUHKHURHV As a result of their efforts, Perrigo delivered strong net sales growth for the second year in a row in 2020 and World-wide Consumer sales reached a new record high. Equally important, the team stabilized adjusted operating income after a few years of decline even as we invested over $50 million in our business and overcame $35 million RIXQSODQQHGKHDGZLQGVGXHSULPDULO\WR&29,'UHODWHGVDIHW\FRVWVDQGEXVLQHVVLPSDFWIURPWKHZHDNFROG FRXJKDQGÀXVHDVRQUHODWHGWR&29,'¶VLPSDFWRQSXEOLFOLIH$OOLQDOOZHKDGDYHU\VWURQJ\HDU Our transformation efforts reached an essential milestone after the year closed when we announced the sale of RXU3UHVFULSWLRQ3KDUPDFHXWLFDOVEXVLQHVVWR$OWDULV&DSLWDO3DUWQHUV//&7KHWUDQVDFWLRQUHLQIRUFHVRXUDELOLW\
    [Show full text]
  • Pharma Pricing, Non-Profit Ties Get Increasing Scrutiny from Prosecutors
    REGULATORY UPDATE REGULATORY UPDATE CONSUMER DRUGS Pediatric Rare Disease Voucher Japan Wants EMA To Stay In Digital Marketing: Health Care Brands’ Program Faces Expiration, p. 12 UK Post-Brexit, p. 15 Window Into Consumers’ Lives, p. 20 Pharma intelligence Pinkpink.pharmamedtechbi.comSheetVol. 78 / No. 38 September 19, 2016 informa Mylan NV was subpoenaed for material Pharma Pricing, Non-Profit Ties Get about the pricing of its generic doxycycline and communications with competitors. And Valeant Pharmaceuticals International Inc. is Increasing Scrutiny From Prosecutors facing several probes about its pricing and BRENDA SANDBURG [email protected] patient assistance programs (see chart, p. 5). Mylan’s doxycycline price increases were called out by Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., in October 2014 when they sent letters to 14 generic drug makers about the pricing of their prod- ucts. They noted that from October 2013 to April 2014, the average price charged for a 500-count bottle of 100 mg tablets had risen from $20 to $1,829, an 8,281% increase. Mylan is now under fire for repeatedly rais- ing the price of its severe allergy treatment EpiPen (epinephrine), which has increased from about $100 for a two-pack in 2008 to more than $600. Members of Congress sent a flurry of letters to the company requesting an explanation for the price hikes. And on Sept. 6, New York Attorney Gen- Shutterstock: blvdone Shutterstock: eral Eric Schneiderman announced that his office has begun an investigation into rug makers have been unable to programs, contractual agreements with Mylan with regard to EpiPen, saying a pre- shake free of government inves- pharmacy benefit managers, support of liminary review revealed that Mylan may Dtigations of their marketing and non-profit organizations, and calculation have inserted potentially anticompetitive sales practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Combination Medications
    Combination Medications WHAT ARE COMBINATION MEDICATIONS? Combination medications are pills, tablets, or injections that contain more than one medication to treat HIV. They are listed in the tables below. Pharmaceutical companies have been working hard to make their medications easier to take. Part of this effort has been to combine more than one medication into a single pill. These combinations are referred to as fixed-dose combinations (FDCs). Combinationantiretroviral therapy (ART), sometimes called highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), has revolutionized the management of HIV infection and rendered it a chronic manageable disease. The first FDC to treat HIV wasCombivir , manufactured by ViiV Healthcare. Combivir contains two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs): lamivudine and zidovudine. This was followed byTrizivir , also manufactured by ViiV Healthcare. Trizivir includes three NRTIs:abacavir , lamivudine, and zidovudine. Both Combivir and Trizivir are no longer widely used in the U.S. due to the frequency and severity of side effects. Be sure that you do not take a combination medication along with any of its components!For example, do not take Truvada (which contains emtricitabine and tenofovir DF) with tenofovir DF (Viread) or emtricitabine (Emtriva). Your healthcare provider will help you decide which HAART regimen is best for you; take your medications exactly as your healthcare provider tells you to. TABLE OF COMBINATION HIV MEDICATIONS Brand name Year Approved Individual Components Also Known As Manufacturer
    [Show full text]
  • Big Pharma Freshens Up
    April 09, 2021 Big pharma freshens up Amy Brown Reliance on established drugs lessened for most large drug makers last year, but staleness is creeping in at Merck and Bristol. All successful drug franchises must one day fade – the challenge comes in finding replacements. It is encouraging therefore to see that almost all major developers improved on the sales freshness index last year, versus 2019, with a couple of notable exceptions. This percentage measure is derived from the proportion of a company’s prescription drug sales that come from products more than 10 years old. Scores range widely within the cohort, showing that some groups have much more work to do than others. Take Abbvie, with 74% of 2020’s drug sales derived from drugs at least a decade old, compared with a much fresher Astrazeneca, at 44%. Abbvie is still very reliant on its mega-blockbuster Humira – the autoimmune antibody contributed 44% of the company’s drugs sales last year – and the big pharma group’s freshness score has not shifted from 2019, when Evaluate Vantage last ran these numbers (Sanofi's geriatric pipeline fails to freshen up, January 22, 2020). Astrazeneca was at the other end of the scale last time and its performance improved again in 2020. The previous laggard Sanofi, meanwhile, has the huge success of Dupixent to thank for its big shift towards the fresher end of the group. The French company’s departure from the top of the table leaves Abbvie, Pfizer and Roche as the stalest big pharma groups, and arguably under the most pressure to find new sales sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission's Post-Trial Brief
    Case 2:14-cv-05151-HB Document 403 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 46 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, Case Number: 2:14-CV-5151-HB v. ABBVIE INC., et al., Defendants. PLAINTIFF FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION’S POST-TRIAL BRIEF Armine Black Daniel S. Bradley Rebecca L. Egeland Jordy J. Hur Garth W. Huston Hannah Lamb Heather M. Johnson Thomas D. Mays Patricia M. McDermott Markus H. Meier Kara L. Monahan Lauren Peay Peter J. Taylor Matthew B. Weprin James Weingarten Attorneys for Plaintiff FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20580 (202) 326-2569 [email protected] Case 2:14-cv-05151-HB Document 403 Filed 03/23/18 Page 2 of 46 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ........................................................................................................ ii KEY PERSONNEL ...................................................................................................................... vi I. Defendants’ objectively baseless lawsuits used the governmental process as an anticompetitive weapon .................................................................................................... 2 A. Defendants enjoyed substantial benefits from the collateral injuries their baseless lawsuits inflicted on Teva and Perrigo ...................................................... 3 B. The evidence at trial supports liability even under Defendants’ erroneous view that PRE requires proof that Defendants knew their lawsuits were baseless .........
    [Show full text]
  • Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. 2012 Annual Report Valeant Inc
    Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. 2012 Annual Report Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. 2012 Annual Report Valeant Gathering Momentum Company Overview Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. (NYSE/TSX:VRX) is a multinational specialty pharmaceutical company that develops and markets prescription and non-prescription pharmaceutical products that make a meaningful difference in patients’ lives. Valeant’s primary focus is principally in the areas of dermatology and neurology. The Company’s growth strategy is to acquire, develop and commercialize new products through strategic partnerships, and build on the company’s strength in dermatology and neurology. Valeant plans to strategically expand its pipeline by adding new compounds or products through product or company acquisitions and will maximize its pipeline through strategic partnering to optimize its research and development assets and strengthen ongoing internal development capabilities. Valeant’s strategic markets are primarily in the United States, Canada, Central and Eastern Europe, Latin America, Australia and South East Asia. Headquartered in Montreal, Quebec, Valeant has approximately 7,000 employees worldwide. FORWARD-LOOKING Statements In addition to current and historical information, this Annual Report contains forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, statements regarding our strategy, expected future revenue, the prospects for approval of product candidates and the timing of regulatory approvals, and the growth and future development of the company, its business units and its products. Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “may,” “will,” “believes,” “estimates,” “potential,” or “continue” or similar language identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements.
    [Show full text]
  • Proxy Statement 2021
    Purpose Blueprint OUR PURPOSE Breakthroughs that change patients’ lives OUR BOLD MOVES 1. Unleash the 2. Deliver 3. Transform our 4. Win the 5. Lead the power of our first-in-class go-to-market digital race conversation people science model in pharma OUR BIG IDEAS 1.1 Create room for 2.1 Source the best 3.1 Improve access 4.1 Digitize drug 5.1 Be known as the meaningful work science in the through new payer discovery and most patient- 1.2 Recognize both world partnerships development centric company leadership and 2.2 Double our 3.2 Address the 4.2 Enhance health 5.2 Drive pro- performance innovation success patient outcomes and innovation/pro- 1.3 Make Pfizer an rate affordability patient experience patient policies amazing 2.3 Bring medicines to challenge 4.3 Make our work 5.3 Focus the narrative workplace for all the world faster 3.3 Transform the way faster and easier on the value of our we engage science patients and physicians OUR VALUES Courage Excellence Equity Joy A Letter from Pfizer’s Chairman & Chief Executive Officer To Our Shareholders: 2020 was a year like none other in Pfizer’s history – defined by bold decisions, even bolder actions and incredible results. With the separation of Upjohn, we created a company that was 20% smaller, but more focused than ever on delivering first-in-class science for the benefit of patients. Through our collaboration with BioNTech, we delivered a breakthrough COVID-19 vaccine in less than a year. And by harnessing the power of a variety of digital capabilities – as well as our own steadfast commitment to patients – we made sure that despite lockdowns and travel restrictions, we continued to reach more than 400 million patients worldwide with our medicines and vaccines.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOGEN INTERNATIONAL GMBH, Plaintiff-Appellant
    Case: 20-1373 Document: 41 Page: 1 Filed: 04/21/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ BIOGEN INTERNATIONAL GMBH, Plaintiff-Appellant v. BANNER LIFE SCIENCES LLC, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2020-1373 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:18-cv-02054-LPS, Chief Judge Leonard P. Stark. ______________________ Decided: April 21, 2020 ______________________ JAMES B. MONROE, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC, for plaintiff-ap- pellant. Also represented by PAUL WILLIAM BROWNING, J. MICHAEL JAKES, LAURA POLLARD MASUROVSKY, JASON LEE ROMRELL. KYLE MUSGROVE, Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP, Charlotte, NC, for defendant-appellee. Also represented by JOHN WORTHINGTON BATEMAN, ELIZABETH CROMPTON, SCOTT A. CUNNING, II, Washington, DC. ______________________ Case: 20-1373 Document: 41 Page: 2 Filed: 04/21/2020 2 BIOGEN INTERNATIONAL GMBH v. BANNER LIFE SCIENCES LLC Before LOURIE, MOORE, and CHEN, Circuit Judges. LOURIE, Circuit Judge. Biogen International GmbH (“Biogen”) appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Dis- trict of Delaware that Banner Life Sciences LLC (“Banner”) does not infringe the extended portion of U.S. Patent 7,619,001 (the “’001 patent”), extended under the patent term restoration provisions of the Hatch-Waxman Act, Pub. L. No. 98-417, § 201, 98 Stat. 1585, 1598 (as codified at 35 U.S.C. § 156 (2018)). Biogen Int’l GmbH v. Banner Life Scis. LLC, No. 18-2054-LPS, 2020 WL 109499 (D. Del. Jan. 7, 2020) (“Decision”). Because the scope of a patent term extension under 35 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]