DOCSLIB.ORG

Political Contributions and Lobbying Activity Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Political Contributions and Lobbying Activity Report 2016 Political Contributions and Lobbying Activity Report Cigna’s mission is to help improve the health, well-being and sense of security of the more than 90 million people we serve around the world. Our strategic focus is centered on delivering high quality, affordable, and personalized products and solutions to our customers and clients by leveraging our insights, brand, talent and localized approach. Around the world, individuals are seeking access to these quality healthcare and sense of security programs. At the same time, employers of all sizes and across all industries and geographies increasingly recognize that healthier, more engaged and productive work forces are essential to driving their businesses forward, while they continue to David M. Cordani seek solutions that are affordable and sustainable. President and Chief Executive Officer Amid this backdrop, many individuals and employers are concerned that they must accept either constrained access or diminished quality or both, in order to achieve affordability of care. At Cigna, we see it differently. We have demonstrated that quality and affordability can be achieved by designing personally-tailored access and high- quality care delivery, with engagement, alignment and support for individuals, and healthcare professionals. We deliver this through personalized and localized benefits and services, which empower our customers and support their actions and decision making. We take a convening role in building communities of health, alongside our employer and provider partners. We support healthcare professionals with actionable insights and further expanded care resources, all while ensuring alignment with them to deliver superior quality and improve affordability. To further innovate for our customers and clients, we are accelerating investments in value-based care programs and incentive payment models with our provider partners that continue to drive enhancements in both care quality and affordability. With that understanding, I am pleased to share our annual political contributions report to provide transparency and insight into how our mission and strategy guide our constructive engagement in external dialogues. As part of Cigna’s federal and state lobbying and advocacy efforts, we make political contributions, as allowed by law. Attached you will find the 2016 annual report of the Cigna Political Action Committee. Cigna is committed to transparency about these activities and is providing this report to communicate openly with our shareholders. Our proven strategy of go deep, go global, go individual differentiates Cigna in the marketplace. We are focused on anticipating and meeting the needs of our customers and clients through ongoing innovation, and committed to being a collaborative, trusted partner. Cigna understands the importance of investing in the health of our communities, and we work to positively impact the health of people, communities and the environment. We will continue to invest in future growth and capabilities, to deliver affordable, personalized solutions, and further expand our geographic reach. David M. Cordani President and Chief Executive Officer 2016 Political Contributions and Lobbying Activity Report • 2 Overview and Cigna takes its engagement in the legislative, regulatory and public policy areas very seriously, approaching all of our efforts with care and integrity. There are two major Governance components that comprise Cigna’s major political activity: (1) political contributions and (2) lobbying efforts. This report is organized to provide information on both of these activities. As Cigna engages in political activity, it adheres to strict governance standards designed to ensure alignment with Cigna’s mission, vision, strategic goals and direction. With respect to political giving activities, all contributions that are made directly by the Company must be made in accordance with Cigna’s Political Contributions Policy that requires, among other things, oversight of decisions at the highest corporate level. Political contributions that are made through Cigna’s Political Action Committee (PAC) are reviewed and approved by the CignaPAC board, comprised of executive-level Cigna leadership, and in accordance with the CignaPAC Contribution Guidelines. With respect to the Company’s lobbying activities, the Vice President of Global Public Policy and Federal Government Affairs and the Vice President of State Government Affairs report directly to the General Counsel and review lobbying efforts with Cigna’s enterprise leadership, including the Chief Executive Officer, on a regular basis. Additionally, all memberships in trade associations are reviewed by the General Counsel and the Chief Executive Officer. The Company also maintains an Enterprise Risk Management function. This company-wide initiative involves the Board (and its Committees), Cigna’s management, Cigna’s Chief Risk Officer and General Auditor and Cigna’s internal audit function. Together they work in an integrated effort to (1) identify, assess, prioritize and monitor (as each of their roles dictates) a broad range of risks (e.g., financial, operational, business, compliance, reputational, governance and managerial), and (2) formulate and execute plans to monitor and, to the extent possible, mitigate the effect of those risks. Within this enterprise risk framework, the Corporate Governance Committee of Cigna’s Board of Directors has oversight of and evaluates any material financial, legal, reputational or other risks associated with Cigna’s corporate political spending and lobbying activities. In addition, the Corporate Governance Committee bi- annually reviews compliance with Cigna’s Political Contributions Policy, including the contributions made under that policy by the Company during the previous year, and annually reviews lobbying expenses and trade association memberships. 2016 Political Contributions and Lobbying Activity Report • 3 Political Cigna regularly supports federal, state, and local officials, candidates, parties and other politically oriented groups and organizations where the Company believes it can advance Contributions its mission, business objectives and goals, including principles or issues that support Cigna’s vision for a sustainable health care system. As Cigna considers making political contributions, it is always guided by the Company’s strategy and mission, demonstrating an eagerness to work with officials of various political and philosophical beliefs and without regard for the private political preferences of its executives. Contributions attributable to Cigna are made in two ways: (1) corporate contributions and (2) through CignaPAC. Cigna has strict standards in place governing its political giving activity, and all of its contributions are made in accordance with applicable state and federal laws. In addition, the Company keeps the work of the CignaPAC separate from other Company giving. Accordingly, this section of the report provides information specifically regarding Cigna’s direct corporate contributions and we have attached a copy of the 2016 CignaPAC report for information regarding contributions made through CignaPAC. Corporate Contributions In certain states, corporations are permitted to contribute to state election campaigns. The Cigna Political Contributions Policy authorizes the use of corporate funds for state contributions on an exception-only basis, requiring the express approval of the General Counsel of the Company after consultation with the Chief Executive Officer. In 2016, Cigna made certain non-PAC corporate contributions – as detailed below – to each of the Republican and Democratic Governors Associations, and the Republican and Democratic Attorneys General Associations to support advocacy of the Company’s priority issues. Corporate Political Contributions 2016 Corporate Contributions to the Following National Party Associations Republican Governors’ Association $100,000 Republican Attorneys General Association $50,000 Democratic Attorneys General Association $50,000 Democratic Governors’ Association $100,000 Cigna did not make any independent expenditures in 2016. 2016 Political Contributions and Lobbying Activity Report • 4 Lobbying Sustained Lobbying Activity and Priorities Cigna engages in lobbying activity to support its position on public policy issues Activities within federal and state political, legislative and regulatory environments. The Company uses both internal and external resources at the federal and state levels, including memberships in trade associations. In 2016, Cigna focused its lobbying efforts on advancing public policies in support of our global business and our clients’ and customers’ needs and interests. Such policies include increasing access to affordable health care; incentives and information to drive better health care and value-based buying decisions; and marketplace competition to afford consumers a wide range of choices to meet their unique health care needs. A crucial part of our lobbying efforts is sharing the work we do to create a more sustainable health care system by partnering with customer, physician and broker partners. We continue to work toward our goal to deliver 90 percent of payments through value-based arrangements and 50 percent of payments through alternative payment models by the end of 2018. Cigna is on track to meet our goals, with 43 percent of payments in alternative models at the end of 2016.Cigna is a leader in the volume to value transition and is well-positioned
Load more

Recommended publications
  • “I'm in Heaven Right Now”
    CHICAGO’SFREEWEEKLYSINCE | JANUARY | JANUARY CHICAGO’SFREEWEEKLYSINCE “I’M IN HEAVEN RIGHT NOW” Angel Bat Dawid taps into the root of all black music. BYLG31 MAYORAL RENT CONTROL THEATER SPOTLIGHT ON IN THE FIRST AND DIRECTORS ON TONI PRECKWINKLE 26TH WARDS GENDER BIAS Ben Joravsky | Kathleen Hinkel10 IN CHICAGO Samantha Smylie 8 Novid Parsi15 THIS WEEK CHICAGOREADER | JANUARY | VOLUME NUMBER A NOTE FROM THE EDITOR “DOES JOURNALISM HAVE a future?” Jill disaffection for journalism that Lepore and have stated their support quite clearly. Lepore asked in the most recent issue of the Peretti point to in their own ways. I’ve put We’re honored. New Yorker, as prankster turned media inno- several of my own publications down, watched But the real appreciation for your sup- vator Jonah Peretti laid o 15 percent of his freelance paychecks dwindle, faced increas- port shines through our pages and on our workforce at BuzzFeed and then refused to ing antagonism for asking basic questions of website. Listen to our first-ever podcast pay most former employees their paid time authority. Perhaps most horrifying, I’ve faced the BACK ROOM DEAL at chicagoreader. o . Meanwhile, we’re over here adding pages the prospect of either doing the work for free com/backroomdeal (or Spotify, Stitcher, or to our print edition, launching a podcast, or choosing to live in a world where the work Apple) for the complete scoop on the Chi- and tracking gains in Web tra c month after doesn’t get done. cago elections from Ben Joravsky and Maya month (after month). (We also expanded our Yet we’ve seized the chance at the Read- Dukmasova.
    [Show full text]
  • A Nalysts Disagree About How to Frame the Recent
    ml-l ii FROM THE CENTER O UT The Evolution of Party Politics: The March of the GOP Continues in North Carolina by Mebane Rash Whitman In March, the Center released the tenth edition of A Reactionary , Revolutionary, or Article II: A Guide to the N.C. Legislature. Article Evolutionary Election? II is a comprehensive guide to the 1995-96 General A nalystsdisagreeabout howtoframe therecent Assembly, containing profiles of each member, ef- electoral wins of the GOP in North Carolina. fectiveness rankings, demographic trends since Were the wins reactionary, that is, were voters 1975, and committee assignments. The latest edi- reacting in an angry anti-incumbent, anti-Democrat, tion reveals three major trends: (1) the significant anti-tax, anti-big government manner? Were the gains of the Republican Party, which now holds 92 wins revolutionary, a changing of the guard in terms of 170 seats in the legislature; (2) women have of which party governs the state-from Democrats, more power in the 1995-96 General Assembly be- whose party has governed the state for almost all of cause they secured plum committee chairs; and (3) the 20th century, to Republicans, who hope to gov- African-American legislators lost the speakership ern much of the 21st century? Or were they evolu- and powerful committee chairs, so their influence tionary, a single step in the long march of the has declined. Republican Party toward true competitiveness in a two-party state? The results of most elections are to some extent elections in North Carolina should not reactionary, but 1994 was not a run-of-the-mill be underestimated.
    [Show full text]
  • Expiration and Vacancies Governor July 2021
    State of Illinois Commission on Government Forecasting and Accountability Expiration and Vacancies Governor July 2021 802 Stratton Office Building Springfield, IL 62706 Phone: 217/782-5320 Fax: 217/782-3515 http://cgfa.ilga.gov JOINT COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES House Republican Leader/Chairperson Rep. Jim Durkin Senate Republican Leader Sen. Dan McConchie President of the Senate Sen. Don Harmon Speaker of the House Rep. Emanuel “Chris” Welch COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENT FORECASTING AND ACCOUNTABILITY Co-Chairperson Sen. David Koehler Co-Chairperson Rep. C. D. Davidsmeyer Executive Director Clayton Klenke Deputy Director Laurie Eby Senators Representatives Omar Aquino Amy Elik Darren Bailey Amy Grant Donald P. DeWitte Sonya Harper Elgie Sims Elizabeth Hernandez Dave Syverson Anna Moeller The Commission on Government Forecasting & Accountability is a bipartisan legislative support service agency that is responsible for advising the Illinois General Assembly on economic and fiscal policy issues and for providing objective policy research for legislators and legislative staff. The Commission’s board is comprised of twelve legislators-split evenly between the House and Senate and between Democrats and Republicans. The Commission has three internal units--Revenue, Pensions, and Research, each of which has a staff of analysts and researchers who analyze policy proposals, legislation, state revenues & expenditures, and benefit programs, and who provide research services to members and staff of the General Assembly. The Commission’s Revenue and Pension Units annually publish a number of statutorily mandated reports as well as on-demand reports in regard to Illinois’ financial and economic condition, the annual operating and capital budgets, public employee retirement systems, and other policy issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Election Commission 1 2 First General Counsel's
    MUR759900019 1 FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 2 3 FIRST GENERAL COUNSEL’S REPORT 4 5 MUR 7304 6 DATE COMPLAINT FILED: December 15, 2017 7 DATE OF NOTIFICATIONS: December 21, 2017 8 DATE LAST RESPONSE RECEIVED September 4, 2018 9 DATE ACTIVATED: May 3, 2018 10 11 EARLIEST SOL: September 10, 2020 12 LATEST SOL: December 31, 2021 13 ELECTION CYCLE: 2016 14 15 COMPLAINANT: Committee to Defend the President 16 17 RESPONDENTS: Hillary Victory Fund and Elizabeth Jones in her official capacity as 18 treasurer 19 Hillary Rodham Clinton 20 Hillary for America and Elizabeth Jones in her official capacity as 21 treasurer 22 DNC Services Corporation/Democratic National Committee and 23 William Q. Derrough in his official capacity as treasurer 24 Alaska Democratic Party and Carolyn Covington in her official 25 capacity as treasurer 26 Democratic Party of Arkansas and Dawne Vandiver in her official 27 capacity as treasurer 28 Colorado Democratic Party and Rita Simas in her official capacity 29 as treasurer 30 Democratic State Committee (Delaware) and Helene Keeley in her 31 official capacity as treasurer 32 Democratic Executive Committee of Florida and Francesca Menes 33 in her official capacity as treasurer 34 Georgia Federal Elections Committee and Kip Carr in his official 35 capacity as treasurer 36 Idaho State Democratic Party and Leroy Hayes in his official 37 capacity as treasurer 38 Indiana Democratic Congressional Victory Committee and Henry 39 Fernandez in his official capacity as treasurer 40 Iowa Democratic Party and Ken Sagar in his official capacity as 41 treasurer 42 Kansas Democratic Party and Bill Hutton in his official capacity as 43 treasurer 44 Kentucky State Democratic Central Executive Committee and M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Impact of Fact-Checking in U.S. Campaigns by Amanda Wintersieck a Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment O
    The Rise and Impact of Fact-Checking in U.S. Campaigns by Amanda Wintersieck A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Approved April 2015 by the Graduate Supervisory Committee: Kim Fridkin, Chair Mark Ramirez Patrick Kenney ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY May 2015 ABSTRACT Do fact-checks influence individuals' attitudes and evaluations of political candidates and campaign messages? This dissertation examines the influence of fact- checks on citizens' evaluations of political candidates. Using an original content analysis, I determine who conducts fact-checks of candidates for political office, who is being fact- checked, and how fact-checkers rate political candidates' level of truthfulness. Additionally, I employ three experiments to evaluate the impact of fact-checks source and message cues on voters' evaluations of candidates for political office. i DEDICATION To My Husband, Aza ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express my sincerest thanks to the many individuals who helped me with this dissertation and throughout my graduate career. First, I would like to thank all the members of my committee, Professors Kim L. Fridkin, Patrick Kenney, and Mark D. Ramirez. I am especially grateful to my mentor and committee chair, Dr. Kim L. Fridkin. Your help and encouragement were invaluable during every stage of this dissertation and my graduate career. I would also like to thank my other committee members and mentors, Patrick Kenney and Mark D. Ramirez. Your academic and professional advice has significantly improved my abilities as a scholar. I am grateful to husband, Aza, for his tireless support and love throughout this project.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Political Contributions
    2012 POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS 2012 Lilly Political Contributions 2 Public Policy As a biopharmaceutical company that treats serious diseases, Lilly plays an important role in public health and its related policy debates. It is important that our company shapes global public policy debates on issues specific to the people we serve and to our other key stakeholders including shareholders and employees. Our engagement in the political arena helps address the most pressing issues related to ensuring that patients have access to needed medications—leading to improved patient outcomes. Through public policy engagement, we provide a way for all of our locations globally to shape the public policy environment in a manner that supports access to innovative medicines. We engage on issues specific to local business environments (corporate tax, for example). Based on our company’s strategy and the most recent trends in the policy environment, our company has decided to focus on three key areas: innovation, health care delivery, and pricing and reimbursement. More detailed information on key issues can be found in our 2011/12 Corporate Responsibility update: http://www.lilly.com/Documents/Lilly_2011_2012_CRupdate.pdf Through our policy research, development, and stakeholder dialogue activities, Lilly develops positions and advocates on these key issues. U.S. Political Engagement Government actions such as price controls, pharmaceutical manufacturer rebates, and access to Lilly medicines affect our ability to invest in innovation. Lilly has a comprehensive government relations operation to have a voice in the public policymaking process at the federal, state, and local levels. Lilly is committed to participating in the political process as a responsible corporate citizen to help inform the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Staff: 86Th Legislature
    HRO HOUSE RESEARCH ORGANIZATION Texas House of Representatives Legislative Staff 86th Legislature 2019 Focus Report No. 86-3 House Research Organization Page 2 Table of Contents House of Representatives ....................................3 House Committees ..............................................15 Senate ...................................................................18 Senate Committees .............................................22 Other State Numbers...........................................24 Cover design by Robert Inks House Research Organization Page 3 House of Representatives ALLEN, Alma A. GW.5 BELL, Cecil Jr. E2.708 Phone: (512) 463-0744 Phone: (512) 463-0650 Fax: (512) 463-0761 Fax: (512) 463-0575 Chief of staff ...........................................Anneliese Vogel Chief of staff .............................................. Ariane Marion Legislative director .....................................Jaime Puente Policy analyst ...........................................Clinton Harned Legislative aide....................................... Jennifer Russell Legislative aide.............................................Brian Aldaco ALLISON, Steve E1.512 BELL, Keith E2.702 Phone: (512) 463-0686 Phone: (512) 463-0458 Chief of staff .................................................Rocky Gage Fax: (512) 463-2040 Legislative director ...................................German Lopez Chief of staff .................................... Georgeanne Palmer Scheduler ...............................................Redding Mickler
    [Show full text]
  • List of Invitees to the Western Springs Town Hall on 5G/Small Cell Wireless Technology
    List of Invitees to the Western Springs Town Hall on 5G/Small Cell Wireless Technology Senator Terry Link Senator Bill Cunningham Senator Donne E. Trotter Senator John J. Cullerton Senator Jil Tracy Senator Michael E. Hastings Representative Kelly M. Burke Representative Peter Breen Representative Mike Fortner Representative Fred Crespo Representative Robert Martwick Representative William Davis Representative Daniel Lipinski Leader Jim Durkin Representative Mike Quigley Representative Chris Welch Representative Deanne Mazzochi Senator John Curran Senator Dick Durbin Senator Tammy Duckworth Senator Suzy Glowiak-Hilton Senator Kimberly Ann Lightford Senator Don Harmon Mr. Tom Cauley, President Village of Hinsdale Mr. Len Austin, President Village of Clarendon Hills Mr. Tom Livingston, President Village of La Grange Mr. Ron Gunter, Mayor Village of Westmont Mr. Jim Discipio, President Village of La Grange Park Mr. Tom Hinshaw, President Village of Indian Head Park Mr. Tom Garrette, Trustee Township of Lyons Ms. Colleen H. Kelly, Trustee Township of Lyons Ms. Donna McDonald, Trustee Township of Lyons Mr. Sean M. Morrison, County Board Commissioner 17th District Mr. Richard Pellegrino, Executive Director West Central Municipal Conference Mr. Kit P. Ketchmark, President Village of Brookfield Mr. Benjamin Sells, President Village of Riverside Mr. Thomas Cushing Township of Lyons Board Mr. Walter Knake, Executive Director Western Springs Park District Mr. Christopher Getty, Township Supervisor Township of Lyons Mr. Michael Porfiro, Clerk Township of Lyons Mr. Sean McDermott, Highway Comm./Mayor of Countryside Township of Lyons Dr. Brian Barnhart, Superintendent Western Springs School Dist. 101 Dr. Timothy Kilrea, Superintendent Lyons Township High School Dist. 204 Ms. Katrina Thompson, Mayor Village of Broadview Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Ameren Il 2020 Mid-Year Corporate Political
    AMEREN IL 2020 MID-YEAR CORPORATE POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION SUMMARY CommitteeID CommitteeName ContributedBy RcvdDate Amount Address1 City State Zip D2Part 25530 Friends of Mark Batinick Ameren 06/30/2020 $ 1,000.00 PO Box 66892 St. Louis MO 63166 Individual Contribution 17385 Friends of Mattie Hunter Ameren 06/30/2020 $ 2,500.00 P.O. Box 66892 St. Louis MO 63166 Individual Contribution 19155 Citizens for Tom Morrison Ameren 06/30/2020 $ 1,000.00 PO Box 66892 St. Louis MO 63166 Individual Contribution 31972 Citizens for Colonel Craig Wilcox Ameren 06/10/2020 $ 3,000.00 PO Box 66892 St Louis MO 63166 Individual Contribution 35553 Brad Stephens for State RepresentativeAmeren 06/04/2020 $ 1,000.00 P.O. BOX 66892 St. Louis MO 63166 Individual Contribution 34053 Committee to Elect Dan Caulkins Ameren 05/29/2020 $ 1,000.00 200 W Washington Springfield IL 62701 Individual Contribution 31821 Fowler for Senate Ameren 05/09/2020 $ 1,000.00 P.O. Box 66892 St. Louis MO 63166 Individual Contribution 35553 Brad Stephens for State RepresentativeAmeren 04/27/2020 $ 1,000.00 P.O. BOX 66892 St. Louis MO 63166 Individual Contribution 4261 Friends of Mary E Flowers Ameren 04/22/2020 $ 2,000.00 607 E. Adams Street Springfield IL 62739 Individual Contribution 34053 Committee to Elect Dan Caulkins Ameren 03/17/2020 $ 1,000.00 200 W Washington Springfield IL 62701 Individual Contribution 22882 Friends of Rita Mayfield Ameren 03/17/2020 $ 1,000.00 P.O. Box 66892 St. Louis MO 63166 Transfer In 25530 Friends of Mark Batinick Ameren 03/11/2020 $ 1,000.00 PO Box 66892 St.
    [Show full text]
  • IDEOLOGY and PARTISANSHIP in the 87Th (2021) REGULAR SESSION of the TEXAS LEGISLATURE
    IDEOLOGY AND PARTISANSHIP IN THE 87th (2021) REGULAR SESSION OF THE TEXAS LEGISLATURE Mark P. Jones, Ph.D. Fellow in Political Science, Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy July 2021 © 2021 Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy This material may be quoted or reproduced without prior permission, provided appropriate credit is given to the author and the Baker Institute for Public Policy. Wherever feasible, papers are reviewed by outside experts before they are released. However, the research and views expressed in this paper are those of the individual researcher(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the Baker Institute. Mark P. Jones, Ph.D. “Ideology and Partisanship in the 87th (2021) Regular Session of the Texas Legislature” https://doi.org/10.25613/HP57-BF70 Ideology and Partisanship in the 87th (2021) Regular Session of the Texas Legislature Executive Summary This report utilizes roll call vote data to improve our understanding of the ideological and partisan dynamics of the Texas Legislature’s 87th regular session. The first section examines the location of the members of the Texas Senate and of the Texas House on the liberal-conservative dimension along which legislative politics takes place in Austin. In both chambers, every Republican is more conservative than every Democrat and every Democrat is more liberal than every Republican. There does, however, exist substantial ideological diversity within the respective Democratic and Republican delegations in each chamber. The second section explores the extent to which each senator and each representative was on the winning side of the non-lopsided final passage votes (FPVs) on which they voted.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee Right to Life Scorecard – Pro-Life Legislation Votes, 2015 Tennessee House of Representatives 109Th General Assembly
    PO Box 110765 Nashville, TN 37222-0765 Ph 615.298.5433 [email protected] Facebook.com/groups/tnrtl/ www.tnrtl.org Twitter.com/tnrighttolife Tennessee Right to Life Scorecard – Pro-Life Legislation Votes, 2015 Tennessee House of Representatives 109th General Assembly 1. House Floor Vote on SB1222/HB0977 (Informed Consent for Women and Girls Considering Abortion and a 48-hour Waiting Period), April 21, 2015. (Passed 79-18) 2. House Floor Vote on SB1280/HB1368 (Regulation of Abortion Facilities, requiring inspection and licensure), April 21, 2015 (Passed 80-17) Representative 1 2 X O Score Speaker Beth Harwell (R-Nashville) X X 2 0 100% Raumesh Akbari (R-Winchester) O O 0 2 0% David Alexander (R-Winchester) X X 2 0 100% Joe Armstrong (D-Knoxville) O O 0 2 0% Bill Beck (D-Nashville) A A 0 0 N/A Harry Brooks (R-Knoxville) X X 2 0 100% Kevin Brooks (R-Cleveland) X X 2 0 100% Sheila Butt (R-Columbia) X X 2 0 100% David Byrd (R – Waynesboro) X X 2 0 100% Kent Calfee (R-Kingston) X X 2 0 100% Karen Camper (D-Memphis) O O 0 2 0% Dale Carr (R-Sevierville) X X 2 0 100% Mike Carter (R-Ooltewah) X X 2 0 100% Glen Casada (R-Thompsons Station) X X 2 0 100% John Ray Clemmons (D-Nashville) O O 0 2 0% Jim Coley (R-Bartlett) X X 2 0 100% Barbara Cooper (D-Memphis) O O 0 2 0% Martin Daniel (R-Knoxville) X X 2 0 100% John DeBerry (D-Memphis) X X 2 0 100% Barry Doss (R-Leoma) X X 2 0 100% Kevin Dunlap (D-Rock Island) X X 2 0 100% Bill Dunn (R-Knoxville) X X 2 0 100% Jeremy Durham (R-Franklin) X X 2 0 100% Jimmy Eldridge (R-Jackson) X X 2 0 100% Jeremy Faison (R-Cosby) X X 2 0 100% Andrew Farmer (R-Sevierville) X X 2 0 100% Joanne Favors (D-Chattanooga) O O 0 2 0% Craig Fitzhugh (D-Ripley) O X 1 1 50% John Forgety (R-Athens) X X 2 0 100% Brenda Gilmore (D-Nashville) O O 0 2 0% Tilman Goins (R-Morristown) X X 2 0 100% Marc Gravitt (R-East Ridge) X X 2 0 100% Curtis Halford (R-Dyer) X X 2 0 100% G.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Susan Schadt, President & CEO, Artsmemphis, Tennessee
    • Fundraising and grant making organization founded by volunteer community leaders in 1963 • Administer over 250 grants annually • Allocated over $40 million in the last 10 years • Support 26 groups through annual operating & project support, fund arts education and outreach and oversee an Audience Development Initiative Mayor A C Wharton & Susan Schadt ArtsMemphis Arts Day 2010 What the Arts Can Do for a City 1. Revitalize Neighborhoods 2. Build Communities 3. Attract and Retain Talent 4. Drive Innovative Thinking Memphis Symphony Orchestra Photo: Rosalie O’Connor Memphis Defined The beliefs, values and legacy that define the Memphis identity. Economic Proof Points • $101.7 million industry in Memphis • Supports 3,616 full-time jobs • Generates $74.7 million in household income to local residents • Delivers $9 million in local and state government revenue South Main Historic Arts District Memphis College of Art photo: Jim Kiihnl Photography South Main Historic Arts District Soulsville USA Stax Music Academy Heart of the Arts UrbanArt Commission UrbanArt Commission Playhouse on the Square Memphis College of Art Memphis Brooks Museum of Art Levitt Shell “City of Choice” Blues Foundation Mara Walker (Americans for the Arts), Ray Pohlman (AutoZone), Susan Schadt and Jim Herr (Boeing) Ballet Memphis NEED IMAGE Driving Innovative Thinking Playhouse on the Square Tennessee General Assembly Western Tennessee Legislators Senator Ophelia Ford Representative G. A. Hardaway Senator Dolores Gresham Representative Mike Kernell Senator Brian Kelsey
    [Show full text]