Swings and Arrows
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Teamwork Exercises and Technological Problem Solving By
Teamwork Exercises and Technological Problem Solving with First-Year Engineering Students: An Experimental Study Mark R. Springston Dissertation submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Curriculum and Instruction Dr. Mark E. Sanders, Chair Dr. Cecile D. Cachaper Dr. Richard M. Goff Dr. Susan G. Magliaro Dr. Tom M. Sherman July 28th, 2005 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: Technology Education, Engineering Design Activity, Teams, Teamwork, Technological Problem Solving, and Educational Software © 2005, Mark R. Springston Teamwork Exercises and Technological Problem Solving with First-Year Engineering Students: An Experimental Study by Mark R. Springston Technology Education Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University ABSTRACT An experiment was conducted investigating the utility of teamwork exercises and problem structure for promoting technological problem solving in a student team context. The teamwork exercises were designed for participants to experience a high level of psychomotor coordination and cooperation with their teammates. The problem structure treatment was designed based on small group research findings on brainstorming, information processing, and problem formulation. First-year college engineering students (N = 294) were randomly assigned to three levels of team size (2, 3, or 4 members) and two treatment conditions: teamwork exercises and problem structure (N = 99 teams). In addition, the study included three non- manipulated, independent variables: team gender, team temperament, and team teamwork orientation. Teams were measured on technological problem solving through two conceptually related technological tasks or engineering design activities: a computer bridge task and a truss model task. The computer bridge score and the number of computer bridge design iterations, both within subjects factors (time), were recorded in pairs over four 30-minute intervals. -
A Gold-Colored Rose
Co-ordinator: Jean-Paul Meyer – Editor: Brent Manley – Assistant Editors: Mark Horton, Brian Senior & Franco Broccoli – Layout Editor: Akis Kanaris – Photographer: Ron Tacchi Issue No. 13 Thursday, 22 June 2006 A Gold-Colored Rose VuGraph Programme Teatro Verdi 10.30 Open Pairs Final 1 15.45 Open Pairs Final 2 TODAY’S PROGRAMME Open and Women’s Pairs (Final) 10.30 Session 1 15.45 Session 2 Rosenblum winners: the Rose Meltzer team IMP Pairs 10.30 Final A, Final B - Session 1 In 2001, Geir Helgemo and Tor Helness were on the Nor- 15.45 Final A, Final B - Session 2 wegian team that lost to Rose Meltzer's squad in the Bermu- Senior Pairs da Bowl. In Verona, they joined Meltzer, Kyle Larsen,Alan Son- 10.30 Session 5 tag and Roger Bates to earn their first world championship – 15.45 Session 6 the Rosenblum Cup. It wasn't easy, as the valiant team captained by Christal Hen- ner-Welland team mounted a comeback toward the end of Contents the 64-board match that had Meltzer partisans worried.The rally fizzled out, however, and Meltzer won handily, 179-133. Results . 2-6 The bronze medal went to Yadlin, 69-65 winners over Why University Bridge? . .7 Welland in the play-off. Left out of yesterday's report were Osservatorio . .8 the McConnell bronze medallists – Katt-Bridge, 70-67 win- Championship Diary . .9 ners over China Global Times. Comeback Time . .10 As the tournament nears its conclusion, the pairs events are The Playing World Represented by Precious Cartier Jewels . -
USA Recapture Mcconnell Cup
Co-ordinator: Jean-Paul Meyer (France) Issue: 12 Chief Editor: Mark Horton (England) Editors: Brent Manley (USA), Brian Senior (England) Layout Editor: George Hatzidakis (Greece) Photographer: Ron Tacchi (England) 28th August 2002 USA recapture McConnell Cup ATTENTION!!! All events begin at 10.00 Open and Women's Pairs 152 pairs play in the Open Pairs Semi-final. Approxi- mately 66 of these will qualify for the final, where about six more pairs are expected to drop in from the Rosenblum semi-finals and final to make a 72-pair final. An American team won the inaugural McConnell Cup 52 pairs play in the Women's Pairs Semi-final.We ex- contest in Albuquerque in 1994 and now eight years pect 21 to qualify for the final, with another 11 pairs later the trophy returns to its native soil.The all Amer- joining them from the McConnell semi-finals and final ican final saw Irina Levitina, Kerri Sanborn, Lynn Deas, to make a field of 32 pairs for the final. Beth Palmer, Randi Montin and Jill Meyers (pictured Both finals will be played over five sessions commenc- above) comfortably outscore Judi Radin, Shawn Quinn, ing on Thursday morning at 10.00 a.m. Mildred Breed, Rozanne Pollack, Hjordis Eythorsdottir and Valerie Westheimer. Seniors Pairs In the Power Rosenblum, after two scintillating semi fi- There are 72 pairs playing in the Seniors Pairs Qualify- nals, Lavazza meet Munawar in today's final. ing stage, of which 28 will go through to the final.This is a three-session event that starts at 10.00 a.m. -
2000 Bridge Bulletin Index
2000 Bridge Bulletin Index ACBL BRIDGE HALL OF FAME. George Rosenkranz named Blackwood Award winner, Meyer Schleifer receives the von Zedtwitz Award C February. Hall of Fame inducts Lou Bluhm, Harry Fishbein, Charles Solomon, George Rosenkranz, Sidney Lazard, Meyer Schleifer and Ira Rubin C October. ACBL BOARD OF DIRECTORS. Highlights from the Boston Board meeting --- February. Election notice C March C May . Highlights of Cincinnati Board meeting C May. Highlights from the Anaheim meeting C October. Election results for 2000 Board C November. ACBL CHARITY FOUNDATION. 2000 Charity Committee appointees named --- February. ACBL CHARITY GAME. Winners C August. ACBL GOODWILL COMMITTEE. 2000 Appointees named --- February. ACBL HALL OF FAME. Rosenkranz wins Blackwood award; Meyer Schleifer is von Zedtwitz award winner C February. ACBL HONORARY MEMBER OF THE YEAR. Chip Martel named for 2000 --- February. ACBL INSTANT MATCHPOINT GAME. Promo C August, September. Results C December. ACBL INTERNATIONAL FUND GAME. Winners C July, November. ACBL PATRON MEMBER LIST. December. ACBL SENIOR GAME. Winners C May. ACE OF CLUBS. Winners of the 1999 contest --- April. AMERICAN BRIDGE ASSOCIATION. Schedule of upcoming national events --- monthly. ANAHEIM NABC. Promos C April --- July. Meltzer squad wins Spingold; Wei-Sender team takes Wagar; District 9 repeats win in GNT-A; District 19 wins GNT-B title; District 13 victorious in GNT-C contest; Zia, Rosenberg top LM Pairs field; Ping, Leung win Red Ribbon; Nugit squad wins Senior Swiss teams C October. Willenken, Silverstein win Fast Open Pairs; Bach and Burgess take IMP Pairs title; Mixed B-A-M winners; 199er Pairs winners; Five-way tie fir Fishbein Trophy; other NABC highlights C November. -
Chapter VII International Bridge
Item 132-100: Chapter VII International Bridge The following items listed in the current Codification Chapter VII A are rescinded: RO = Rescind Obsolete Bold numbers refer to where items can be found in the new codification. CHAPTER VII – INTERNATIONAL EVENTS A. POLICY Eligibility Requirements – Zone II, Number Two Team for the Bermuda Bowl (833-33) RO Moved, that subject to approval by Bermuda, Mexico and the Canadian Bridge Federation, an NABC member may play in the Tri- Country playoff for the Zone II, Number II Bermuda Bowl Team provided (l) he has not played for another NCBO in NABC or Zonal competition for two and a half years prior to the scheduled date of the event for which he is attempting to qualify; and, (2) is a citizen, or a bona fide resident for at least the last two consecutive years, of the country he is representing. Should the “bona fide residency” of a participant be challenged, the respective bridge organization must present proof of residency to an NABC credentials committee. An NABC member who has played in the Tri-Country playoff, or represented another NCBO in NABC or Zonal competition, may not play in the U.S. Team Trials until the third qualifying year after having last competed for another NCBO. Fund Raising Games Prior to Hosting NABC Championships (841-34) RO The regulation authorizing NAC hosting organizations to conduct Fund Raising Games (Item_832-61) is amended to include organizations hosting World Championships. Virgin Islands Bridge Federation and C.A.A.C.B.F. (863-44) RO The Virgin Islands Bridge Federation’s request to become an NCBO of the NABC as a member of Zone V while maintaining NABC affiliation is approved. -
GIB: Imperfect Information in a Computationally Challenging Game
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 14 (2001) 303–358 Submitted 10/00; published 6/01 GIB: Imperfect Information in a Computationally Challenging Game Matthew L. Ginsberg [email protected] CIRL 1269 University of Oregon Eugene, OR 97405 USA Abstract This paper investigates the problems arising in the construction of a program to play the game of contract bridge. These problems include both the difficulty of solving the game’s perfect information variant, and techniques needed to address the fact that bridge is not, in fact, a perfect information game. Gib, the program being described, involves five separate technical advances: partition search, the practical application of Monte Carlo techniques to realistic problems, a focus on achievable sets to solve problems inherent in the Monte Carlo approach, an extension of alpha-beta pruning from total orders to arbitrary distributive lattices, and the use of squeaky wheel optimization to find approximately optimal solutions to cardplay problems. Gib is currently believed to be of approximately expert caliber, and is currently the strongest computer bridge program in the world. 1. Introduction Of all the classic games of mental skill, only card games and Go have yet to see the ap- pearance of serious computer challengers. In Go, this appears to be because the game is fundamentally one of pattern recognition as opposed to search; the brute-force techniques that have been so successful in the development of chess-playing programs have failed al- most utterly to deal with Go’s huge branching factor. Indeed, the arguably strongest Go program in the world (Handtalk) was beaten by 1-dan Janice Kim (winner of the 1984 Fuji Women’s Championship) in the 1997 AAAI Hall of Champions after Kim had given the program a monumental 25 stone handicap. -
S Som a G Mma End Aire D
le bululletin Festival de Bridge de Juan les Pins Samedi 23 mai 2009 . N°9 J u an 2009 Sous le plus grand chapiteau du monde AAggeennddaa l’issue des séances, le chœur des lamentations de bridgeurs ème Le 23 mai est le 143 jour de ne s’entend pas qu’en français. En effet, s’il est un festival qui l’année A mérite d’être qualifié d’international c’est bien celui de Juan‐ Saints : Didier les‐Pins. Le plus grand événement du bridge européen ac‐ À la Saint‐Didier, soleil orgueil‐ leux, nous annonce un été joyeux cueille des joueurs issus de nombreuses contrées. Demain : 4ème séance de l’open à Ainsi, cette année, les bridgeurs étrangers représentent envi‐ 15h00. ron 35% de la totalité des participants. Ce sont les Hollandais Températures : mini 17° Maxi 24° qui forment le contingent le plus important (8%) suivi des Belges (6%) et des Suisses (5%). Viennent ensuite les Italiens (4%). On déplore d’ailleurs une diminution de leurs effectifs due à un chevauchement de dates avec la coupe d’Italie. Les Polonais, eux, représentent environ 2,5% du total des festivaliers. SSoommmmaaiirree On peut observer aussi la présence des joueurs venus de tous horizons. (Afrique du Sud, Argentine, Inde, Lituanie, Roumanie Imagination au pouvoir ............... p 2 etc.) Tout cela malgré la proximité du « transnational » qui se Eerste Filarski ............................... p 3 disputera au mois de juin prochain à San Remo. British Gossip ............................... p 5 Nul doute qu’au fil des années, la variété des nationalités pré‐ Jeux .............................................. p 6 sentes à Juan‐les‐Pins s’étoffera et ce, pour le plus grand bon‐ Bridge en Grande‐Bretagne ........ -
Bridge for Dummies‰
01_924261 ffirs.qxp 8/17/06 2:49 PM Page i Bridge FOR DUMmIES‰ 2ND EDITION by Eddie Kantar 01_924261 ffirs.qxp 8/17/06 2:49 PM Page iv 01_924261 ffirs.qxp 8/17/06 2:49 PM Page i Bridge FOR DUMmIES‰ 2ND EDITION by Eddie Kantar 01_924261 ffirs.qxp 8/17/06 2:49 PM Page ii Bridge For Dummies®, 2nd Edition Published by Wiley Publishing, Inc. 111 River St. Hoboken, NJ 07030-5774 www.wiley.com Copyright © 2006 by Wiley Publishing, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana Published simultaneously in Canada No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permis- sion of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400, fax 978-646-8600. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Legal Department, Wiley Publishing, Inc., 10475 Crosspoint Blvd., Indianapolis, IN 46256, 317-572-3447, fax 317-572-4355, or online at http://www. wiley.com/go/permissions. Trademarks: Wiley, the Wiley Publishing logo, For Dummies, the Dummies Man logo, A Reference for the Rest of Us!, The Dummies Way, Dummies Daily, The Fun and Easy Way, Dummies.com and related trade dress are trademarks or registered trademarks of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and/or its affiliates in the United States and other countries, and may not be used without written permission. -
The Cliff Hangers of Verona
Co-ordinator: Jean-Paul Meyer – Editor: Brent Manley – Assistant Editors: Mark Horton, Brian Senior & Franco Broccoli – Layout Editor: Akis Kanaris – Photographer: Ron Tacchi Issue No. 9 Sunday, 18 June 2006 The Cliff Hangers of Verona TODAY’S PROGRAMME Rosenblum Cup (Round of 16) McConnell Cup (Quarter Final) 10.30 Boards 1-14 (Session 1) 13.45 Boards 15-28 (Session 2) 16.05 Boards 29-42 (Session 3) 18.25 Boards 43-56 (Session 4) Senior Teams 10.30 Session 9 12.15 Session 10 15.00 Session 11 16.45 Session 12 Open and Women’s Pairs Maddalena De Gregorio at the station provided by the 10.30 Session 3 tournament sponsor Lavazza. 15.30 Session 4 On the day the Open and Women's Pairs got under way, there were several team matches that went down to the VuGraph Programme wire, including a near-miracle comeback in a McConnell match. Teatro Verdi The Lynn Baker squad had a bad third set against the Swedish Katt-Bridge team and found themselves trailing 16.05 TBA 139-79 with 14 boards to go. Baker amassed numerous 18.25 TBA double-digit swings and nearly pulled it out but lost 156- 155 The Levy-Westheimer McConnell match was still going at press time as the final 14 boards had to be re- played because players sat the wrong directions. Contents In the Rosenblum, the Lavazza team withdrew against the Danish Hecht-Johansen squad after three sets, trailing 146- Results . 2-5 31, and the strong Ekeblad team (USA) was ousted by the Cose di Casa Nostra . -
Applying Case-Based Reasoning to the Game of Bridge
Applying Case-Based Reasoning to the Game of Bridge Jacob Bellamy-McIntyre A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Postgraduate Diploma of Science in Computer Science, University of Auckland, 2008 1 Abstract Bridge provides a challenging problem for Artificial Intelligence research due to the game being stochastic (from the shuffling of the cards), hidden information (from not being able to see opponents cards) and from the general complexities of the game. Research into Computer Bridge is in its relative infancy, with the American Contract Bridge League holding the first World Championships Computer Bridge competition in 1997. With Bridge being a game that is more probabilistic and intuitive than Chess, it may be a better avenue of research for evaluating human-like intelligence. This paper will explore the possibility of applying Case Base Reasoning to the game of Bridge and will discuss the problems that arise from trying to do so, while comparing Case Base Reasoning to other techniques used in Artificial Intelligence. 2 Table of Contents 1. Case-Based Reasoning 1.1 Introduction ……………………………… 5 1.2 The Domain and Adaptation …………….. 8 1.3 The Case and the Case Base …………….. 10 1.4 The Similarity Function …………………. 11 2. Games in AI 2.1 Introduction ………………………………………….14 2.2 Chess ………………………………………………. 15 2.3 Checkers …………………………………………… 17 2.4 Poker ………………………………………………. 19 2.5 Bridge ……………………………………………… 25 2.6 Other Games ……………………………………... 28 3. The Game of Bridge 3.1 Introduction to Bridge ………………………........... 30 3.2 The Bidding Phase …………………………….…… 30 3.3 Play of the Hand …………………………………... 31 3.4 The Value of a Hand ………………………………. -
Veldhoven 2011 Issue No10
Co-ordinator: Jean-Paul Meyer • Chief Editor: Brent Manley • Editors: Phillip Alder, Mark Horton, Jos Jacobs, Micke Melander, Brian Senior • Lay Out Editor: Akis Kanaris • Photographer: Ron Tacchi Issue No. 10 Tuesday, 25 October 2011 VANQUISHED IN VELDHOVEN Competitors in the World Computer Bridge Championships monitor their robot players. A winner will emerge on Friday or Saturday. For the first time in the history of the Venice Cup, there will be no USA team in the final stages of the Contents championship. Both USA squads were bounced from the Tournament Results . .2 quarter-final round, USA1 going down to the Netherlands, 200-172, and USA2 falling to Indonesia, 238-208. BB: Italy - China and Iceland - Netherlands QF1 . .4 In the 17 times that the Venice Cup has been played The difference between... .9 previously, the USA has earned 10 gold medals, five silver VC: QF1 (Netherlands - USA 1 and USA 2 - Indonesia) .10 medals and one bronze. They were shut out only in Estoril, SB: QF4 (France - Germany) . .12 Portugal, in 2005, USA2 losing a playoff to the Dutch team. Tight match . .15 Venice Cup semi-final matchups are Indonesia — England IBPA Awards . .18 (winners over Sweden) and Netherlands — France (winners Blame it on Marco Polo . .20 over China). Swinglish fourth segment . .24 continued on page 3 40th WORLD TEAM CHAMPIONSHIPS Veldhoven, The Netherlands RESULTS Bermuda Bowl Quarter-finals Tbl c/o Boards Boards Boards Boards Boards Boards Total 1 - 16 17 - 32 33 - 48 49 - 64 65 - 80 81 - 96 1 Italy 0 75 28 19 18 31 34 205 China 0.3 -
64Th Annual Potomac Valley Tournament — May 14-17, 2009
www.WashingtonBridgeLeague.org March/April 2009 Come on out to the Washington Bridge League’s 64th Annual B Potomac Valley Tournament ♣ MAY 14-17, 2009 U The WBL May Sectional is packed with special events and games along with great hospitality. ♥ I/N players, check it out! There’s a full schedule of Intermediate & Novice events and a One-Day Bridge Class on Sunday. L Friday night, the IMP Pairs are back... It’s a pair game that scores like a team game! ♠ Between sessions on Saturday attend the free Panel Show. At 11:00am and 3:30pm, check out the 6th Annual Washington Bridge League Trophy Pairs. L Sunday, between sessions, this traveling trophy will be presented to the winners. ♦ Did we mention hospitality? Check out the Famous Washington Hospitality throughout the E tournament with free lunches between sessions all Check out the ♥ weekend. Annual Meeting, Elections and See page 3 forCh thear fullity tournament Game o schedule...n May 7 at the Unit Game T Come play bridge, vote for your new board, and feast at Christ the King Church on Thursday, May 7... ♣ Complimentary Buffet Dinner . .6:00 p.m. Meeting and Elections . .7:00 p.m. I Charity Game . .7:30 p.m. Volunteers are needed to help with cooking at Nadine’s the night ♠ before, starting at 7 p.m. We also need volunteers (not food) to help pre- pare and set up food on the day, at the church, starting at 3 p.m. Any person who can help, even if only for an hour or two, will be welcome.