DOCSLIB.ORG

Parks & Shade Tree Commission Meeting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Parks & Shade Tree Commission Meeting Parks & Shade Tree City of Rehoboth Beach Commission 229 Rehoboth Avenue Telephone 302-227-6181 P.O. Box 1163 www.cityofrehoboth.com Rehoboth Beach, Delaware 19971 PARKS & SHADE TREE COMMISSION MEETING City Hall Commissioners Room, 2nd Floor Monday, October 22, 2018; 2:00 p.m. AGENDA Page 1. Call to Order 2. Welcome new members. 3. Roll Call 4. Correspondence Email received October 18, 2018 from Sturges Dodge, 512 New 3 - 13 Castle Street Extended - in support of City Arborist decision for 318 Country Club Drive Letter received October 19, 2018 from Brian Patterson, 105 Country Club Drive - in opposition to tree removal Email received October 19, 2018 from Susan Gay, 316 Country Club Drive - in opposition to tree removal at 318 Country Club Drive Email received October 22, 2018 from Brian Patterson, 105 Country Club Drive - in response to 17 pages of additional material submitted for 318 County Club Drive 5. Approval of Minutes – Meeting held on August 27, 2018 6. Old Business 7. New Business A. The purpose of this meeting is to conduct an administrative appeal hearing pursuant to the Comprehensive Tree Ordinance (Chapter 253 of the Municipal Code of the City of Rehoboth Beach): 1. Appeal Hearing No. 0918-05 requested by Jeff 14 - 22 Meredith of Sussex Tree Inc. on behalf of Tim Mahoney, owner of the property located at 237 Rehoboth Avenue pursuant to Section 253-36 of the Municipal Code of the City of Rehoboth Beach, and pertains to a determination of a fee in lieu of mitigation for one tree. Public Notice - 237 Rehoboth Avenue Arborist Report - 237 Rehoboth Avenue Application with Support Documents - 237 Rehoboth Avenue Page 1 of 84 2. Appeal Hearing No. 0918-06 requested by Jeff 23 - 30 Meredith of Sussex Tree Inc. on behalf of Renee Richardson, owner of the property located at 508 Lee Street pursuant to Section 253-36 of the Municipal Code of the City of Rehoboth Beach, and pertains to a determination of a fee in lieu of mitigation for one tree. Public Notice - 508 Lee Street Arborist Report - 508 Lee Street Application with Support Documents - 508 Lee Street 3. Appeal Hearing No. 0918-07 requested by John 31 - 69 McKenna, Winifred McKenna and Mary Ann Stain, owners othe property located at 318 Country Club Drive pursuant to Section 253-36 of the Municipal Code of the City of Rehoboth Beach, and pertains to an appeal of a denial of a tree removal application for a 56 inch caliper tree and/or a determination of a fee in lieu of mitigation. Public Notice - 318 Country Club Drive Arborist Report - 318 Country Club Drive Application with Support Documents - 318 Country Club Drive Support Documents - 318 Country Club Drive 4. Appeal Hearing No. 0918-08 requested by Jeff 70 - 84 Meredith of Sussex Tree Inc. on behalf of Bruce Vivari & Barbara Wagner, owners of the property located at 19 Lake Avenue, pursuant to Section 253- 36 of the Municipal Code of the City of Rehoboth Beach, and pertains to a determination of a fee in lieu of mitigation for one tree. Public Notice - 19 Lake Avenue Arborist Report - 19 Lake Avenue Application with Support Documents - 19 Lake Avenue 8. Other Business A. City Arborist's Report 9. Adjournment AGENDA ITEMS MAY BE CONSIDERED OUT OF SEQUENCE [Time may not allow for the considereation of all agenda items.] For additional information or special accommodations, please call (302) 227- 6181 (TDD Accessible) 24-hours prior to the meeting. amw: 10/15/18; posted 10/15/18 Page 2 of 84 From: Sturges Dodge <[email protected]> Date: Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 10:47 AM Subject: Parks and Shade Tree Commission Appeal Hearing 318 Country Club Drive To: All Members of the Parks and Shade Tree Tree Commission From : Sturges Dodge, 512 New Castle Street Extended, Rehoboth Beach, DE Dear Commissioners, I am writing in support of Liz Lingo, the City Arborist’s decision to deny the request for a tree removal permit for the 176 inch trunk circumference Silver Maple in the rear yard of 318 Country Club Drive. I am also writing in support of the preservation of this significant tree, most likely one of a shrinking group of trees that were present when Country Club Estates was a golf course. This is a tree that could qualify, in my opinion as an Historic Tree per section 253-28 C. Of the Tree Code. I believe that the applicants’ claim for the right to remove the tree is based on section 253-30 (2) (a) (4), which states that ,” the tree is located where it creates or will create a material safety or health hazard or nuisance with respect to existing or proposed structures or vehicles or pedestrian routes, and such hazard or nuisance is not innate to or commonly associated with the existence of trees in general( for example, lightning, wet leaves on the ground during rainstorms”. In my opinion, Ms Lingo, has offered sufficient and substantial solutions to the applicant to ameliorate any perceived or anticipated harms the tree may be causing. In interpreting the code and consulting with the applicant I believe she has correctly executed her duty and is more than justified in denying this application. I would like to remind the Commission, albeit perhaps unnecessarily, that per section 253-36, A. , “ A notice of appeal must be in writing and shall include the applicant’s grounds for appeal. The notice of appeal must identify the error upon which the appeal is based and the grounds for reversal of the Building Inspector’s decision.” Therefore, unless the applicant can convincingly identify an error in Ms Lingo’s and the Building Inspector’s decision, it is incumbent on the Commission to deny this appeal. It is not in my opinion, the Commission’s charge when deciding appeal cases to lessen the protective intent of the code in order to reduce inconvenience or increase potential financial gain for an appellant. I make the above comment in light of at least one other situation in town that I have encountered, where a tree removal was approved based on a complaint that the applicant had to clear roots annually from sewage pipes, a far from financially prohibitive cost, and one that could have been solved by making necessary repairs to aging pipes. In this case a lovely front yard loblolly pine went down shortly before the house was put on the market, demolished, and replaced with a much larger house and a much smaller tree that will never contribute to the City's high tree canopy. I have no way of knowing if the current appellant has similar motives, but it would not surprise me if this is his or her way to “clear the way” toward a more lucrative sale of the property for redevelopment. This would most likely result in the permanent reduction, by one more tree, of the City’s high tree canopy. Sincerely, Sturges Dodge Page 3 of 84 October 19, 2018 Priscilla Smith, Chair Park and Shade Tree Commission City of Rehoboth Beach Via e-mail to: Anne Womack, Secretary [email protected] Ref: Appeal for 318 Country Club Drive Dear Chair and Members of the Park and Shade Tree Commission, I am writing as a homeowner in Country Club Estates and a former member for nine years on the Planning Commission of the City of Rehoboth Beach, in which capacity I worked extensively with the current Tree Ordinance and I was a primary author of the Planning Commission's 2014 draft amendments to the Tree Ordinance. I wish to be recorded in opposition to the application for removal of this tree located in the rear yard at 318 Country Club Drive. On the one hand, this is a fine, healthy, mature shade tree that is protected by the law. This specimen tree bestows immeasurable benefits upon the community, in terms of the enjoyment of its beauty, its shade, its absorption of storm water, its purification of air, etc. On the other hand, neither the original application nor the appeal to this commission satisfies any of the criteria for removing a protected tree. The applicants cite Section 253-30 A(2)(a)(4), but they completely fail to explain how this tree poses the requisite "material safety or health hazard or nuisance." The key word is "material". An alleged hazard or nuisance must be the determining factor precluding use and enjoyment of existing or proposed structures or vehicles or pedestrian routes. No ordinary hazard or nuisance will suffice. Here, the applicants allege hazards that are mundane and common to all mature backyard trees. As the keeper of a towering London planetree in my own backyard on Country Club Drive, I know well the struggle of maintaining a level walkway and a grassy yard with the roots and shade of a large tree. The common possibility that tree roots might cause damage to a foundation, upheaval to a slab or walkway, or damage to a lawnmower blade cannot be avoided in a “Tree City” such as Rehoboth Beach, but such risks can easily be mitigated by reasonable measures short of killing the tree. If those everyday nuisances are sufficient to justify removal of a healthy shade tree, then we may as well not have a Tree Ordinance at all. Page 4 of 84 The applicant raises a number of legal and constitutional arguments that are unconvincing to me as a practicing lawyer for 23 years. With all respect to the Park & Shade Tree Commission, it is not your role to judge the constitutionality of the Tree Ordinance.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Delaware Senate Journal
    SENATE LEGISLATION SENATE BILLS fil!.! - AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 5 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO BUILDING AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS. Pages 4, 6, 38 (Signed by the Governor 2/21/03) SB 2 - AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 24 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO THE BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC. Pages 4, 6, 7, 8, 38 (Signed by the Governor 2/21/03) SB 3 - AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 30 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO BUSINESS TAXES. Pages 5, 6, 37, 38 (Signed by the Governor 1/31/03) SB 4 - AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 23 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATED TO DREDGING AND BEACHES. Pages 6, 20 (Stricken) SB 5 - AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 24 OF THE DELA WARE CODE RELATING TO PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS. Pages 6, 11, 23, 24, 106, 108, 184, 187 (Signed by the Governor 7/15/03) SB 6 - AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 7 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO OYSTER HARVESTING. Page 6 (Senate Natural Resources and Environmental Control Committee) SB 7 - AN ACT CONCURRING IN A PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 OF THE DELAWARE CONSTITUTION OF 1897, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO FREEDOM OF SPEECH. Pages 6, 50, 79, 122, 181 (Enacted without Signature) SB 8 - AN ACT TO AMEND CHAPTER 158, VOLUME 36 OF THE LAWS OF DELAWARE, AS AMENDED, BEING THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF DOVER, RELATING TO ELECTIONS. Pages 7,263 (Stricken) SB 9 - AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 13 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO THE DIVISION OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT AND TITLE 7 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO HUNTING, TRAPPING AND FISHING.
    [Show full text]
  • Utilizing Dignity Rights to Further Tribal Prerogatives: the Lenape Indian Tribe of Delaware
    Utilizing Dignity Rights to Further Tribal Prerogatives: The Lenape Indian Tribe of Delaware Dean Roland Dignity Rights Practicum Delaware Law Spring 2017 Professors Daly & May For the Lenape Indian Tribe of Delaware QUESTION PRESENTED What new rights or benefits does the recent state recognition of the Lenape Indian Tribe of Delaware (the “Lenape”) bestow upon the Lenape and how can the recent recognition of dignity rights in American jurisprudence help further tribal prerogatives? BRIEF ANSWER State recognition of the Lenape has limited benefits such as access to federal and state funding, qualifying as an Indian Tribe under various statutes, and a recognition of the Lenape’s inherent dignity and longstanding presence within a state. Courts around the world along with local and national governments have found an inherent or implied right to dignity within the right to life and liberty. The Delaware Constitution expressly acknowledges a right to life and liberty. The right to dignity, which is implied in the Delaware Constitution, fills the gaps that state recognition fails to address. This paper will analyze how dignity can be used as a means of seeking redress for an infringed upon right to better the Lenape’s way of life. INTRODUCTION The Lenape Indian Tribe of Delaware (the “Lenape”) resided in the coastal regions of Delaware and Pennsylvania for hundreds of years before European contact. The tribe, along with the other tribes of the present day United States, lived their lives free with dignity to move freely over the land and use the resources that the earth provided them. European contact had a profound impact on the Native’s way of life, not only individuals, but as a distinct group.
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware Legislative Drafting Manual
    Jump to Table of Contents DELAWARE LEGISLATIVE DRAFTING MANUAL Legislative Council Division of Research January 2019 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK DELAWARE LEGISLATIVE DRAFTING MANUAL 2019 Edition Published by Legislative Council’s Division of Research Lori Christiansen, Director Mark J. Cutrona, Esq., Deputy Director, Division of Research, Co-Editor Holly Vaughn Wagner, Legislative Attorney, Division of Research, Co-Editor Parliamentary Procedure Advisors Bernard Brady, Secretary of the Senate Rich Puffer, Chief Clerk of the House of Representatives Proofreaders – Division of Research Sara Zimmerman, Legislative Librarian Deborah Gottschalk, Legislative Attorney Word Processors – Division of Research Colinda Marker & Natalie White Legislative Graphics and Printing Services Donald Sellers, Robert Lupo, & Nathan Poore, Division of Research Additional copies of this publication are available online at http://legis.delaware.gov/LawsOfDE/BillDraftingManual or by contacting the Division of Research’s Legislative Information Office 411 Legislative Avenue Legislative Hall Dover, Delaware 19901 302-744-4114 Approved by Legislative Council September 18, 2013 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK PREFACE TO THIS EDITION This is the fourth update to the Delaware Legislative Drafting Manual since Mark and I joined the Division of Research and we are excited to present an edition that includes the input of many of you, the drafters who use the manual. We hope that you find this version even more user-friendly, covering the many updates and additional scenarios you’ve shared with us over the last two years. Anyone who has attended one of our drafting workshops knows that legislative drafters in Delaware have our own version of the Hippocratic Oath to “first, do no harm”: to draft the law concisely and with clarity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Supreme Court of Delaware,1900-1952
    Volume 56 Issue 2 Dickinson Law Review - Volume 56, 1951-1952 1-1-1952 The Supreme Court of Delaware,1900-1952 Paul Dolan Follow this and additional works at: https://ideas.dickinsonlaw.psu.edu/dlra Recommended Citation Paul Dolan, The Supreme Court of Delaware,1900-1952, 56 DICK. L. REV. 166 (1952). Available at: https://ideas.dickinsonlaw.psu.edu/dlra/vol56/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews at Dickinson Law IDEAS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dickinson Law Review by an authorized editor of Dickinson Law IDEAS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DICKINSON LAW REVIEW VOL. 56 THE SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, 1900-1952 By PAUL DOLAN* On May 14, 1951, the Delaware General Assembly, by amending the state's constitution,1 created a supreme court composed of justices who only sat in that court. Between 1897 and 1951 the Supreme Court of Delaware consisted of those state judges who had not heard the case below. Thus Delaware was said to use the "left-over judge" system in its final appellate jurisdiction. 2 Since the above-mention- ed amendment the supreme court is manned by three justices appointed by the governor and confirmed by the state senate. These judges are not permitted to serve in the inferior courts. To establish a tribunal of final appeal with personnel unattached to the trial courts was not easy in Delaware. The opposition to this change was obdurate and continuous. It was based primarily on the fact that any change contemplated in governmental arrangements in the state is met with deep suspicion by many seg- ments of the population.
    [Show full text]
  • Uniform Electronic Legal Material Act – Enactments June 2019
    UNIFORM ELECTRONIC LEGAL MATERIAL ACT – ENACTMENTS JUNE 2019 STATE BILL NUMBER COVERED LEGAL MATERIALS FISCAL IMPACT ENACTED EFFECTIVE • Constitution of Arizona Arizona • Arizona session laws No fiscal impact SB 1414 5/17/2016 8/8/2016 • Arizona Revised Statutes $135,000 to $165,000 (General Fund) for set up, authentication, • California Constitution archiving, and onsite storage. California SB 1075 • California Statutes 9/13/2012 7/1/2015 • California Codes Annual ongoing costs in the range of $40,000 to $70,000. • Colorado Constitution • Session Laws of Colorado $198,912 4/26/2012 3/31/2014 Colorado HB 1209 • Colorado Revised Statutes • State agency rules with effect of law • Constitution of Connecticut • General Statutes of Connecticut Connecticut SB 235 • Regulations of Connecticut state agencies No fiscal impact 5/17/2013 10/1/2014 • Reported decisions of Connecticut Supreme Court, Connecticut Appellate Court, and Connecticut Superior Court • Constitution of Delaware • Delaware Laws of Delaware No fiscal impact HB 403 • Delaware Code 7/23/2014 10/21/2014 • Regulations published in the Delaware Administrative Code • Hawaii Constitution • Hawaii Session Laws • Hawaii Revised Statutes Hawaii • State agency rules with effect of law No fiscal impact SB 32 / HB 18 • Reported decisions of Supreme Court of 4/16/2013 7/1/2013 State of Hawaii and Intermediate Appellate Court of Hawaii • State court rules • Idaho Constitution • Idaho Session Laws • Idaho Code Idaho • Idaho Administrative Code and Administrative No fiscal impact S1356 Bulletin
    [Show full text]
  • A Chronological Guide to Records of the DE State Legislature
    A Chronological Guide to Records of the Delaware State Legislature at the Delaware Public Archives By Jeff Forrett LEGISLATIVE RECORDS, COLONIAL PERIOD – 1776 DELAWARE LAWS RG 1111 Laws of Delaware 1700-1775, vol. 1 The first of the two published volumes of the Laws of the State of Delaware, from the Fourteenth Day of October, One Thousand Seven Hundred, to the Eighteenth Day of August, One Thousand Seven Hundred and Ninety-Seven (New-Castle: Samuel and John Adams, 1797) contains the bills passed by the Delaware General Assembly between 1700 and 1775 inclusive. An appendix to volume one contains various public papers, including certain legislative acts between 1682 and 1778 that had either expired, been altered or repealed. An index to the first volume of the Laws of the State of Delaware may be found at the end of the second volume. Available on microfilm, 1 roll. The records in the Laws of the State of Delaware are arranged chronologically. Laws cover such topics as buying land from the natives, the naturalization of foreigners, individuals dying intestate, land possession and inheritance, bills of credit and exchange, debt, the orphans court, the administration of justice, adultery and fornication, drunkenness and blasphemy, swine running at large, peddlers, servants and slaves, horse-stealing, dueling, killing of deer and wolves, and the construction of roads. RG 1111.000 Delaware Colonial Laws, 1734, 1741 One reel of microfilm contains three publications: 1. Anno Regni Georgii II. Regis Magnae Britanniae, Franciae, & Hiberniae, Septimo. At a General Assembly of the Counties of New-Castle, Kent and Sussex upon Delaware, begun and holden at New-Castle, the Twentieth Day of October, Anno.
    [Show full text]
  • Title 10 Courts and Judicial Procedure
    Title 10 Courts and Judicial Procedure NOTICE: The Delaware Code appearing on this site is prepared by the Delaware Code Revisors and the editorial staff of LexisNexis in cooperation with the Division of Research of Legislative Council of the General Assembly, and is considered an official version of the State of Delaware statutory code. This version includes all acts effective as of August 19, 2021, up to and including 83 Del. Laws, c. 126. DISCLAIMER: With respect to the Delaware Code documents available from this site or server, neither the State of Delaware nor any of its employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, including the warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately-owned rights. Please seek legal counsel for help on interpretation of individual statutes. Cover Page Title 10 - Courts and Judicial Procedure Chap. 1 - SUPREME COURT Subchap. I - Organization and Operation Part I Organization, Powers, Jurisdiction and Operation of Courts Chapter 1 SUPREME COURT Subchapter I Organization and Operation § 101. Place of holding Court. ---The Supreme Court shall be held at Dover, except in limited circumstances involving a judicial emergency under Chapter 20 of this title or when the Court determines that the education of the Bar or law students, or the public interest would be advanced by having a special session of the Court in another location. (Code 1852, § 1907; Code 1915, § 3683; Code 1935, § 4235; 10 Del.
    [Show full text]
  • 32 Aware, at Or Near Newark, Delaware, and to Authorize the Issuance of the Bonds of the State of Delaware to Obtain Funds Therefor
    32 aware, at or near Newark, Delaware, and to authorize the issuance of the bonds of the State of Delaware to obtain funds therefor. Introduced, read and ref erred, p. 206; re­ ported, p. 450; special order, p. 567; passed, p. 588; con­ curred in, p. 706; signed by Speaker, p. 7 48; delivered to Governor, p. 760. H.B. No. 151-An Act to authorize the Governor and Secre­ tary of State of the State of Delaware to convey to the United States of American certain lands belonging to the State of Delaware. Introduced, read and referred, p. 207; reported, pp. 241, 242; passed, pp. 250, 251; concurred in, p. 458; signed by Speaker, 464; delivered to Governor, p. 481; approved by Governor, p. 562. H.B. No. 152-An Act authorizing the Governor and the Sec­ retary of State of the State of Delaware to convey to the United States of America certain lands into the Town of Newark, Delaware, now belonging to the State of Delaware. Introduced, read and referred, p. 207; reported, p. 242; passed, p. 251; concurred in, p. 458; signed by Speaker, p. 464; delivered to Governor, p. 481; approved by Governor, p. 562. H.B. No. 153-An Act to authorize the Governor and the Sec- retary of State of the State of Delaware to convey certain · lands belonging to the State of Delaware. Introduced, read and referred, p. 207; reported, p. 242; passed, pp. 251, 2f,:!; concurred in, pp. 457, 458; signed by Speaker, p. :164; de­ livered to Governor, p. 482; approved by Governor, p.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Public School Education in Delaware. Bulletin, 1917, No
    DEPARTMENT OI THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF EDUCATION BULLETIN. 1917, No. 18 HISTORY OF PUBLIC SCHOOL .EDUCATION IN DELAWARE By STEPHEN B. WEEKS ' BUREAU OF EDUCATION 7 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1917 ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION NAT BR PROCURZU VIVI/A THZ SUPIRINTINDINT OF DOCUltILLITS GOVZINNINT PRINTING OMCZ WASHINGTON, S. C. AT 20 CENTS PER COPY In the Nene serie a: 'Bulletin, 1912, No. 27.History of Public School Education in Arkansas. Bulletin, 1915, No. 12.History of Public So loolJEducation in Alabama. In preparation: Hbtory of Public School Education In Arizona. 13btory of Public School Education In Tennessee. 4 CONTENTS. NO. Letter of transmittal 5 Acknowledgments Chapter I. Colonial growth and development 7 I. Original settlements: The Swedes, the Dutch, and the English- 7 Education among the Swedes and the Dutch 10 III. Education among the English settlers before the Revolution 14 Chapter II. The first attempts at State education 19 I. The State school fund period, 1798;1829 19 II. The beginning of school legislation 23 The laws of 1817, 1818, and 1821 The reasons for their failure 26 III. Sunday school legislation 27 IV. Further legislative discussion 28 Gov. Collins's message of 1822 29 Discussion by following governors 30 V. Statistical summary of the school fund to 1829 34 Chapter III. The beginnings of public schools 36 I. Willard Hall, 1780-1875 36 I I . The free school act of 1829 and its later amendments, 1830- 1660 38 Provisions of the act of 1829 39 Amendments of the act of 1829 and Their significance 41 III.
    [Show full text]
  • Government for the State of Delaware
    State of Delaware CONSTITUTION As Adopted in Convention, June 4, 1897 with Amendments Made Subsequently Thereto, Through January 28, 2021 THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE As adopted in convention, June 4, 1897 with Amendments made subsequently thereto, through January 28, 2021 This document is published as a public service by the Legislative Council, Division of Research. For further information, please visit us on the ground floor of Legislative Hall or call us toll-free, from anywhere in Delaware 1-800-282-8545 Out-of-state callers must dial (302) 744-4114 We may also be reached by fax: (302) 739-3895 Our mailing address is: Division of Research, 411 Legislative Avenue, Dover, Delaware 19901. Visit us at our web site www.legis.delaware.gov 01/21 Page 2 of 42 DELAWARE CONSTITUTION OF 1897 AS AMENDED THROUGH JANUARY 28, 2021 WE THE PEOPLE, HEREBY ORDAIN AND ESTABLISH THIS CONSTITUTION OF GOVERNMENT FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE PREAMBLE Through Divine goodness, all people have by nature the rights of worshiping and serving their Creator according to the dictates of their consciences, of enjoying and defending life and liberty, of acquiring and protecting reputation and property, and in general of obtaining objects suitable to their condition, without injury by one to another; and as these rights are essential to their welfare, for due exercise thereof, power is inherent in them; and therefore all just authority in the institutions of political society is derived from the people, and established with their consent, to advance their happiness; and they may for this end, as circumstances require, from time to time, alter their Constitution of government.
    [Show full text]
  • The Assault on Judicial Independence and the Uniquely Delaware Response
    The Assault on Judicial Independence and the Uniquely Delaware Response Devera B. Scott, Esq., Keith J. Feigenbaum, Esq., Kelley M. Huff, Esq., and the Honorable Jan R. Jurden* Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION........................................................................... 218 II. A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE SEPARATION OF POWERS.................. 219 A. Introduction ........................................................................ 219 B. Roots of the Separation of Powers Doctrine ...................... 223 C. Early Challenges by State Legislatures to the Separation of Powers Doctrine............................................................. 225 D. The Judiciary’s Exclusive Powers as Enunciated in the United States Constitution and the State Constitution of Delaware ............................................................................ 226 III. JUDICIAL ELECTIONS: DETRIMENTAL IMPACT ON THE PUBLIC’S PERCEPTION OF JUSTICE............................................. 227 A. Introduction ........................................................................ 227 B. The Separation of Powers Today: Assault and Retreat..... 229 C. The High Price of Judicial Elections.................................. 234 IV. CURRENT EFFORTS TO REPEL (AND REDUCE) ATTACKS ON JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE........................................................... 237 A. Election of Judges is a Major Underlying Cause of Attacks on Judicial Independence....................................... 239 B. “The Delaware Way” ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • I a Case Study of the Conversion to Full
    Running head: A CASE STUDY OF THE CONVERSION… i A Case Study of the Conversion to Full-time Vocational Education in Delaware G. Gerald Lamey Wilmington University A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Wilmington University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Education in Innovation and Leadership A CASE STUDY OF THE CONVERSION… ii Dedication I am dedicating my dissertation to my wife, Debbie Lamey, and our five wonderful children: Morgan, Carter, Paige, Elyse, and Griffin. I would like to thank them for all their love and support, and for allowing me to, “stay in the race.” Throughout my career, my wife and family have supported my efforts and dreams. They have made sacrifices to allow me to complete my dream of earning my doctorate. Because of their support, I am proud to say that this study was completed and my doctorate has been achieved. A CASE STUDY OF THE CONVERSION… iii Acknowledgements I would like to take this opportunity to thank those who have influenced me, both in the work of this study, and throughout my educational career. I would like to thank Dr. Lewis Atkinson who was my principal advisor for this study. His guidance and patience enabled me to persevere and create this document. I would also like to thank Dr. Joe Deardorff, who was the Dean of Doctoral Studies when I began the program, for his encouragement to pursue my doctorate; Dr. Joe Crossen, who was my second reader and always offered help and support; Mrs. Terri Villa, who I shared the fabulous journey of building a new school with, Dr.
    [Show full text]