DOCSLIB.ORG

STATE COURT ADMINISTRATORS 1997 Annual Meeting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Conference of CHIEF JUSTICES Conference of STATE COURT ADMINISTRATORS 1997 Annual Meeting Cleveland, Ohio Conference of Conference of Chief Justices State Court Administrators Abrahamson, Shirley S. Wisconsin Baldwin, Robert N. Virginia Amestoy, Jeffrey L. Vermont Bauermeister, Mercedes M. Puerto Rico Anderson, E. Riley Tennessee Becker, Daniel Utah Andreu-Garda, Jose A. Puerto Rico Benedict, Jerry L. Texas Arnold, W. H. (Dub) Arkansas Berson, Steven V. Colorado Bell, Robert M. Maryland Broderick, Michael F. Hawaii Benham, Robert Georgia Buenger, Michael L. South Dakota Benton, Duane Missouri Byers, David K. Arizona Brock, David A. New Hampshire Cameron, Dallas A., Jr. North Carolina Callahan, Robert J. Connecticut Chenovick, Patrick A. Montana Calogero, Pascal E, Jr. Louisiana Ciancia, James J. New Jersey Carrico, Harry L. Virginia Click, Kingsley W. Oregon Carson, Wallace P., Jr. Oregon Cole, Stephanie J. Alaska Chapel, Charles S. Oklahoma Collins, Hugh M. Louisiana Durham, Barbara Washington Conyers, Howard W. Oklahoma Finney, Ernest A., Jr. South Carolina Dosal, Sue K. Minnesota F1aherj:y, John P. Pennsylvania Doss, Robert L., Jr. Georgia Franchini, Gene E. New Mexico Ferrell, Charles E. Tennessee Freeman, Charles E. Illinois Ferry, John D., Jr. Michigan George, Ronald M. California Gingerich, James D. Arkansas Hodge, Verne A. Virgin Islands Glessner, James T. Maine Hooper, Perry 0., Sr. Alabama Goodnow, Donald D. New Hampshire Kauger, Yvonne Oklahoma Greacen, John M. New Mexico Kaye, Judith S. New York Gregory, Frank W. Alabama Keith, A. M. (Sandy) Minnesota Groundland, Lowell L. Delaware Kogan, Gerald Florida Guerrero, Edward C. D. Northern Mariana Islands Kruse, E Michael American Samoa Hammond, Ulysses B. District of Columbia Lee, Dan M. Mississippi Harrall, Robert C. Rhode Island Mallett, Conrad L., Jr. Michigan Irwin, John J., Jr. Massachusetts Matthews, Warren W. Alaska Isaacs, Paul F. Kentucky McCormick, Michael J. Texas Johnson, Allen C. Wyoming McFarland, Kay Kansas Judson, Lilia G. (Acting) Indiana McGiverin, Arthur A. Iowa Larkin, Ronald L. Missouri Miller, Robert A. South Dakota Lippman, Jonathan New York Mitchell, Burley B., Jr. North Carolina Markert, George A. South Carolina Moon, Ronald T. Y. Hawaii McQueen, Mary Campbell Washington Moyer, Thomas J. Ohio Ment, Aaron Connecticut Phillips, Thomas R. Texas Moran, J. Denis Wisconsin Poritz, Deborah T. New Jersey Nelson, Keithe E. North Dakota Shearing, Miriam Nevada O'Brien, William J. Iowa Shepard, Randall T. Indiana Palmer, Kenneth R. Florida Siguenza, Peter Charles Guam Paopao, Eliu F. American Samoa Stephens, Robert E Kentucky Philyaw, Ted J. West Virginia Taylor, Marty W. K. Northern Mariana Islands Riggin, George B., Jr. Maryland Taylor, William A. Wyoming Rohrs, Georgia J. (Acting) Nevada Trout, Linda Copple Idaho Schillaci, Joseph A. Illinois Turnage, Jean A. Montana Schwartz, Howard P. Kansas VandeWalle, Gerald W. North Dakota Smith, Martin T. Mississippi Veasey, E. Norman Delaware Smith, Viola E. Virgin Islands Vollack, Anthony E Colorado Sobolevitch, Nancy M. Pennsylvania Wagner, Annice M. District of Columbia Steele, Joseph C. Nebraska Wathen, Daniel E. Maine Stover, Stephan W. Ohio Weisberger, Joseph R. Rhode Island Suskin, Lee Vermont White, C. Thomas Nebraska Tobias, Patricia Idaho Wilkins, Herbert P. Massachusetts Vickrey, William C. California Workman, Margaret L. West Virginia Zimmerman, Michael D. Utah Zlaket, Thomas A. Arizona CONFERENCE OF CHIEF JUSTICES Board of Directors 1996..97 President Arthur A. McGiverin, Iowa President-elect Thomas R. Phillips, Texas First Vice President David A. Brock, New Hampshire Second Vice President James H. Brickley, Michigan Immediate Past President Thomas J. Moyer, Ohio Robert Benham, Georgia Judith S. Kaye, New York Robert A. Miller, South Dakota Randall T. Shepard, Indiana Gerald W. VandeWalle, North Dakota Michael D. Zimmerman, Utah CONFERENCE OF STATE COURT ADMINISTRATORS Board of Directors 1996..97 President Hugh M. Collins, Louisiana President-elect Nancy M. Sobolevitch, Pennsylvania Vice President William C. Vickrey, California Immediate Past President Mary Campbell McQueen, Washington Howard W. Conyers, Oklahoma Lowell L. Groundland, Delaware Ulysses B. Hammond, District of Columbia Kenneth R. Palmer, Florida George B. Riggin, Jr., Maryland Stephan W. Stover, Ohio National Center for State Courts 300 Newport Ave. (Zip Code 23185), P.O. Box 8798, Williamsburg, VA 23187-8798 (757) 259-1841, fax (757) 259-1520 The biographical listings in this membership directory reflect information available on July 7,1997. The information was gathered with the assistance of the members of the Conference ofChief Justices and the Conference of State Court Administrators. PERRY O. HOOPER, SR. Chief Justice Hooper took office in 1995. Staff attorney, Supreme Coun of Alabama; elected judge of probate of Montgomery County, 1964; reelected 1970; elected circuit judge of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, 1974 (presiding judge, 1978); private law practice, 1983-95. Elected to Republican National Committee, 1972; reelected every four years since then. Member: Capital City Kiwanis Club (past president); Alabama Probate Judges Association (president, 1971); Alabama International Airpon Authority (board member and secretary); Policy Forum on Litigation and Regulatory Reform Commmittee. Attended Birmingham Southern College; graduated from University of Alabama with degrees in commerce and law. Married, four children, six grand­ children. Supreme Coun of Alabama 300 Dexter Avenue Mongtomery, AL 36104-3741 (334) 242-4599 Fax (334) 242-4483 ALABAMA FRANK W. GREGORY Administrative Director of Courts Gregory took office in October 1995. Director, Alabama Judicial College, 1985-95. Director, State Coun Operations Division, 1981-85. Director, Research, Planning, and Development Division, 1979-81. Montgomery County coun adminis­ trator, 1977-79. Principal: Opelika High School, Opelika, Alabama, 1969-77; Mobile Middle School, Mobile, Alabama, 1968-69. Assisanr principal, John Shaw High School, Mobile, Alabama, 1966-68. Teacher: Davidson High School, Mobile, Alabama, 1965-66; Bessemer High School, Bessemer, Alabama, 1963-65. Member: National Association for Coun Management; National Association of State Judicial Educators. B.A. and M.A., University of Alabama. Born October 21,1939. Married, one child. Administrative Director of the Courts 300 Dexter Avenue Montgomery, AL 36104-3741 (334) 242-0300 Fax (334) 242-2099 [email protected] ·WARREN W MATIHEWS Chief}ustice Matthews has served on the supreme coun since 1977 and previously served as chief justice from 1987 to 1990. Private practice (Anchorage), 1965-77. Chairman, Alaska Judicial Council, 1987-90. Past member, Alaska Sentencing Commission, 1990-93; Board of Governors, Alaska Bar Association; Alaska Bar Ethics and Unauthorized Practices Committee; Supreme Coun Criminal Rules Revision Committee. B.A., Stanford University, 1961. J.D., Harvard University Law School, 1964. Born April 5, 1939. Married, two children. Supreme Coun of Alaska 303 K Street Anchorage, AK 99501 (907) 264-0618 Fax (907) 264-0878 ALASKA STEPHANIE J. COLE Administrative Director of the COUTTS Cole took office in 1997. Deputy director of Alaska Coun System, 1983-97. Assistant attorney general/supervising attorney, Alaska Depanment of Law, 1980-82. Director of legal education and information, Alaska Court System, 1977-80. Private practice, 1976-77. Master/coun attorney, Alaska Court System, 1975-76. B.A., University of California, Los Angeles, 1971. J.D., UCLA School of Law, 1975. M.RA., University of Alaska, 1993. Fellow (Award of Merit), Institute for Coun Management, 1994. Born July I, 1949. Alaska Court System 303 K Street Anchorage, AK 99501 (907) 264-0547 Fax (907) 264-0881 [email protected] E MICHAEL KRUSE ChiefJustice Kruse was appointed to the High Court of American Samoa by the U.S. Secretary of the Interior on November I, 1988. Associate justice, 1987-88. General practice of law, American Samoa, 1975-87. Judge pro tempore, district court, American Samoa, 1980-85. Member: American Samoa (past president) and District of Columbia bar associations. B.A., LL.B., Victoria University (New Zealand). Master of Comparative Law, American Practice, George Washington Universiry National Law Center. Born January 27,1948. Married, three children. The High Court of American Samoa Courthouse P.O. Box 309 Pago Pago, AS 96799 011 (684) 633-1410 Fax 011 (684) 633-1318 AMERICAN SAMOA ELIU E PAOPAO Court Administrator/ComptrolIer Paopao assumed his duties with the High Court of American Samoa on September 29, 1991. Hospital administrator, LBJ Hospital (the only medical/hospital faciliry in the Territory of American Samoa), 1982-91. Federal grants administrator, Department of Treasury, Amercian Samoa Government, 1970-81. B.A. (science and finance), Chadron State College, Nebraska, 1971. MEet (secondary education administration), Brigham Young University, Utah, 1975. Court Administrator High Court of American Samoa P.O. Box 309 Pago Pago AS 96799 011 (684) 633-1150 Fax 011 (684) 633-1318 THOMAS A. ZLAKET Chief}ustice Ziaket assumed his duties in 1997, having previously served as vice chief justice in 1996; he has served on the supreme coun bench since 1992. Private practice: Ziaket & Ziaket, 1982·92; Slutes, Estes, Ziaket, Sakrison & Wasley, 1973·82; Estes, Browning, Maud and Ziaket (later Estes & Ziaket), 1970·73; Maud & Ziaket, 1968·70; Lesher, Scruggs, Rucker, Kimble & Lindamood (Tucson), 1965·68. Member:
Recommended publications
  • Lord Chief Justice Delegation of Statutory Functions

    Lord Chief Justice Delegation of Statutory Functions

    Delegation of Statutory Functions Lord Chief Justice – Delegation of Statutory Functions Introduction The Lord Chief Justice has a number of statutory functions, the exercise of which may be delegated to a nominated judicial office holder (as defined by section 109(4) of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 (the 2005 Act). This document sets out which judicial office holder has been nominated to exercise specific delegable statutory functions. Section 109(4) of the 2005 Act defines a judicial office holder as either a senior judge or holder of an office listed in schedule 14 to that Act. A senior judge, as defined by s109(5) of the 2005 Act refers to the following: the Master of the Rolls; President of the Queen's Bench Division; President of the Family Division; Chancellor of the High Court; Senior President of Tribunals; Lord or Lady Justice of Appeal; or a puisne judge of the High Court. Only the nominated judicial office holder to whom a function is delegated may exercise it. Exercise of the delegated functions cannot be sub- delegated. The nominated judicial office holder may however seek the advice and support of others in the exercise of the delegated functions. Where delegations are referred to as being delegated prospectively1, the delegation takes effect when the substantive statutory provision enters into force. The schedule is correct as at 12 May 2015.2 The delegations are currently subject to review by the Lord Chief Justice and a revised schedule will be published later in 2015. 1 See Interpretation Act 1978, section 13. 2 The LCJ has on three occasions suspended various delegations in order to make specific Practice Directions.
  • GUAM RULES of APPELLATE PROCEDURE (As of February 24, 2014)

    GUAM RULES of APPELLATE PROCEDURE (As of February 24, 2014)

    SUPREME COURT OF GUAM 1 GUAM RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE (as of February 24, 2014) 1 Adopted by the Supreme Court of Guam pursuant to Promulgation Order No. 07-003-01 (Feb. 21, 2007). Amended pursuant to Promulgation Order No. 07-003-06 (Feb. 24, 2014). Please see “SOURCE” to each rule for any amendment that may have occurred to said rule. COL2242014 TABLE OF CONTENTS APPLICABILITY OF RULES Page Rule 1 -- Effective Date of Rules, Scope and Practice. 1 Rule 2 -- Suspension of Rules. 1 APPEALS FROM JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS OF THE SUPERIOR COURT Rule 3 -- Appeals, Notice. 1 (a) Filing the Notice of Appeal. (b) Joint or Consolidated Appeals. (c) Content of the Notice of Appeal. (d) Criminal Appeals. (e) Denomination of Parties. (1) Appeals. (2) Cross-Appeals. (3) Privacy and Confidentiality. (f) Service of the Notice of Appeal. Rule 4 -- Appeals, Timing . 4 (a) Appeal in a Civil Case. (1) Time for Filing a Notice of Appeal. (2) Filing before Entry of Judgment. (3) Multiple Appeals. (4) Effect of a Motion on a Notice of Appeal. (5) Motion for Extension of Time. (6) Reopening the Time to File an Appeal. (7) Entry Defined. (b) Appeal in a Criminal Case. (1) Time for Filing a Notice of Appeal. (2) Filing before Entry of Judgment. (3) Effect of a Motion on a Notice of Appeal. (4) Motion for Extension of Time. (5) Jurisdiction. (6) Entry Defined. (c) Appeal by an Inmate Confined in an Institution. (d) Mistaken Filing in the Court of Appeals. Rule 4.1 -- Statement of Jurisdiction.
  • 50 State Survey(Longdoc)

    50 State Survey(Longdoc)

    AGREEMENTS TO INDEMNIFY & GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE: A Fifty State Survey WEINBERG WHEELER H U D G I N S G U N N & D I A L TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Alabama 4 Alaska 7 Arizona 12 Arkansas 15 California 19 Damages arising out of bodily injury or death to persons. 22 Damage to property. 22 Any other damage or expense arising under either (a) or (b). 22 Colorado 23 Connecticut 26 Delaware 29 Florida 32 Georgia 36 Hawaii 42 Idaho 45 Illinois 47 Indiana 52 Iowa 59 Kansas 65 Kentucky 68 Louisiana 69 Maine 72 Maryland 77 Massachusetts 81 Michigan 89 Minnesota 91 Mississippi 94 Missouri 97 Montana 100 Nebraska 104 Nevada 107 New Hampshire 109 New Jersey 111 New Mexico 115 New York 118 North Carolina 122 North Dakota 124 Ohio 126 Oklahoma 130 Oregon 132 Pennsylvania 139 Rhode Island 143 South Carolina 146 South Dakota 150 Tennessee 153 Texas 157 Utah 161 Vermont 165 Virginia 168 Washington 171 West Virginia 175 Wisconsin 177 Wyoming 180 INTRODUCTION Indemnity is compensation given to make another whole from a loss already sustained. It generally contemplates reimbursement by one person or entity of the entire amount of the loss or damage sustained by another. Indemnity takes two forms – common law and contractual. While this survey is limited to contractual indemnity, it is important to note that many states have looked to the law relating to common law indemnity in developing that state’s jurisprudence respecting contractual indemnity. Common law indemnity is the shifting of responsibility for damage or injury from one tortfeasor to another
  • Dissolving and Winding Down the Kentucky Business Entity

    Dissolving and Winding Down the Kentucky Business Entity

    DISSOLVING AND WINDING DOWN THE KENTUCKY BUSINESS ENTITY Sponsor: Business Law Section CLE Credit: 1.0 Wednesday, June 21, 2017 10:40 a.m. - 11:40 a.m. East Ballroom A-B Owensboro Convention Center Owensboro, Kentucky A NOTE CONCERNING THE PROGRAM MATERIALS The materials included in this Kentucky Bar Association Continuing Legal Education handbook are intended to provide current and accurate information about the subject matter covered. No representation or warranty is made concerning the application of the legal or other principles discussed by the instructors to any specific fact situation, nor is any prediction made concerning how any particular judge or jury will interpret or apply such principles. The proper interpretation or application of the principles discussed is a matter for the considered judgment of the individual legal practitioner. The faculty and staff of this Kentucky Bar Association CLE program disclaim liability therefore. Attorneys using these materials, or information otherwise conveyed during the program, in dealing with a specific legal matter have a duty to research original and current sources of authority. Printed by: Evolution Creative Solutions 7107 Shona Drive Cincinnati, Ohio 45237 Kentucky Bar Association TABLE OF CONTENTS The Presenters ................................................................................................................. i Dissolution of a Limited Liability Company ...................................................................... 1 Introduction .........................................................................................................
  • The Joint Inspection of the Devon and Cornwall Criminal Justice Area

    The Joint Inspection of the Devon and Cornwall Criminal Justice Area

    THE JOINT INSPECTION cpsi OF THE H M Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate DEVON AND CORNWALL CRIMINAL JUSTICE AREA ON-SITE SEPTEMBER 2006 FEBRUARY 2007 HM Inspectorate of Court Administration THE JOINT INSPECTION cpsi OF THE H M Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate DEVON AND CORNWALL CRIMINAL JUSTICE AREA ON-SITE SEPTEMBER 2006 FEBRUARY 2007 HM Inspectorate of Court Administration THE JOINT INSPECTION OF THE DEVON AND CORNWALL CRIMINAL JUSTICE AREA ON-SITE SEPTEMBER 2006 FEBRUARY 2007 The Joint Inspection Report on the Devon and Cornwall Criminal Justice Area The Joint Inspection Report on the Devon and Cornwall Criminal Justice Area CONTENTS Preface 1. Introduction . .1 Devon, Cornwall and the Isle of Scilly . 1 Devon and Cornwall Criminal Justice Board. 1 Scope of inspection . 2 Methodology . 2 Structure of the report. 3 2. Executive Summary . .5 Overview. 5 Public confidence and community engagement . 6 Bringing offenders to justice . 6 Reducing ineffective trials. 7 The treatment of victims and witnesses. 8 The treatment of defendants . 8 The enforcement of community sentences . 8 Key performance results. 9 3. The governance and structure of the Devon and Cornwall Criminal Justice Board . 13 Overview. 13 Governance. 13 Structure . 15 Strategic plan and direction . 16 Accountability . 16 The criminal justice office. 18 4. Improving public confidence and community engagement . 19 Overview. 19 Improving public confidence. 19 Equality and diversity . 20 Strategic partnerships . 21 5. Bringing offenders to justice. .23 Overview. 23 Offences brought to justice . 23 Pre-charge advice and decision-making scheme . 25 The structure of the statutory charging scheme . 25 The operation of the scheme .
  • No Justice in Utah's Justice Courts: Constitutional Issues, Systemic Problems, and the Failure to Protect Defendants in Utah's Infamous Local Courts Samuel P

    No Justice in Utah's Justice Courts: Constitutional Issues, Systemic Problems, and the Failure to Protect Defendants in Utah's Infamous Local Courts Samuel P

    Utah OnLaw: The Utah Law Review Online Supplement Volume 2012 Article 2 2012 No Justice in Utah's Justice Courts: Constitutional Issues, Systemic Problems, and the Failure to Protect Defendants in Utah's Infamous Local Courts Samuel P. Newton Teresa L. Welch Neal G. Hamilton Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.law.utah.edu/onlaw Part of the Courts Commons, Judges Commons, and the Jurisprudence Commons Recommended Citation Newton, Samuel P.; Welch, Teresa L.; and Hamilton, Neal G. (2012) "No Justice in Utah's Justice Courts: Constitutional Issues, Systemic Problems, and the Failure to Protect Defendants in Utah's Infamous Local Courts," Utah OnLaw: The Utah Law Review Online Supplement: Vol. 2012 , Article 2. Available at: https://dc.law.utah.edu/onlaw/vol2012/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Utah Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Utah OnLaw: The tU ah Law Review Online Supplement by an authorized editor of Utah Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NO JUSTICE IN UTAH’S JUSTICE COURTS: CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES, SYSTEMIC PROBLEMS, AND THE FAILURE TO PROTECT † DEFENDANTS IN UTAH’S INFAMOUS LOCAL COURTS Samuel P. Newton,* Teresa L. Welch,** & Neal G. Hamilton*** [T]here’ll be no Justice of the Peace for you; just a big piece of justice.1 INTRODUCTION Justice courts2 could be called the most loved and hated court in the judicial system. The justices of the peace who preside over the courts are equally polarizing figures. The courts have been called “a powerful, multifaceted, local legal institution”3 which “helped design and weave together the social, economic, and political fabric”4 of American society.
  • The Judiciary of Guam Fiscal Year 2017 a Citizen - Centric Report Website

    The Judiciary of Guam Fiscal Year 2017 a Citizen - Centric Report Website

    The Judiciary of Guam Fiscal Year 2017 A Citizen - Centric Report Website: www.guamcourts.org TABLE OF CONTENTS About Us 1 Our Performance 2 Vision Our Finances 3 e Judiciary will Our Outlook 4 provide the highest quality of judicial services, thus enhanc- ing public trust and condence in Guam’s Mission independent and e Judiciary administers justice by co-equal branch of interpreting and upholding the government and laws, resolving disputes in a timely becoming the model manner and providing accessible, of governmental ecient and eective court excellence. services. The Supreme Court of Guam (L-R) Justice F. Phillip Carbullido, Chief Justice Katherine A. Maraman and Justice Robert J. Torres. About Us e Judiciary of Guam is the third branch of the Government of Guam that is charged with interpreting the laws of the U.S. Territory of Guam. e Judiciary is comprised of the Superior Court of Guam and the Supreme Court of Guam of which both the trial and appellate courts provide for the selement of disputes between parties and protects the rights of individuals as mandated in the Organic Act of Guam and the Constitution of the United States of America. e Judicial Council of Guam is the governing body of the Judiciary of Guam. Pursuant to law, it is composed of all full-time Justices of the Supreme Court, the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court, and an appointed Superior Court Judge. e current compo- sition of the Judicial Council was created in 2003, and in 2004, aer an amendment to the Organic Act of Guam eectuated by the United States Congress in Public Law 108-378, the The Superior Court of Guam (L-R) Family Court Referee Linda L.
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit ______PETITION for a WRIT of CERTIORARI ______SCOTT L

    Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit ______PETITION for a WRIT of CERTIORARI ______SCOTT L

    No. ______ In the Supreme Court of the United States __________________ GIANINNA GALLARDO, AN INCAPACITATED PERSON, BY AND THROUGH HER PARENTS AND CO-GUARDIANS PILAR VASSALLO AND WALTER GALLARDO, Petitioner, v. SIMONE MARSTILLER, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF THE FLORIDA AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION, Respondent. __________________ On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit __________________ PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI __________________ SCOTT L. NELSON BRYAN S. GOWDY PUBLIC CITIZEN LITIGATION Counsel of Record GROUP MEREDITH A. ROSS 1600 20th Street NW CREED & GOWDY, P.A. Washington, DC 20009 865 May Street (202) 588-1000 Jacksonville, FL 32204 (904) 350-0075 FLOYD FAGLIE [email protected] STAUNTON & FAGLIE, PL 189 E. Walnut Street Monticello, FL 32344 (850) 997-6300 Counsel for Petitioner March 9, 2021 Becker Gallagher · Cincinnati, OH · Washington, D.C. · 800.890.5001 i QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the federal Medicaid Act provides for a state Medicaid program to recover reimbursement for Medicaid’s payment of a beneficiary’s past medical expenses by taking funds from the portion of the beneficiary’s tort recovery that compensates for future medical expenses. ii PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDINGS Petitioner Gianinna Gallardo, an incapacitated person, by and through her parents and co- Guardians Pilar Vassallo and Walter Gallardo, was the plaintiff-appellee below. Respondent Simone Marstiller is, in her official capacity, the current Secretary of the Florida Agency for Healthcare Administration. Her predecessors (Mary Mayhew, Justin Senior, and Elizabeth Dudek) were—during their respective tenures and in their official capacities as Secretaries of the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration—previously named as the defendant-appellant below.
  • Utah S Wyoming S��Colorado��S��Texas

    Utah S Wyoming SColoradoSTexas

    Fall 2016 Dewhirst DolvenLLC Attorneys at Law Legal Update Utah s Wyoming sColoradosTexas Plaintiffs appealed, seeking a trial de novo Utah at the district court. At trial, Defendant in brief stressed the multiple inconsistencies in Plaintiffs’ medical records as to how the DEWHIRST & DOLVEN accident occurred and as to the alleged UTAH OBTAINS THREE DEFENSE injuries. Upon bench trial, the district court • The Utah Supreme Court VERDICTS IN A TRIAL DE judge also held that the alleged injuries did judicially adopted a new cause of NOVO not match the vehicle’s minor scrape mark. action for filial consortium for Salt Lake City County: Dewhirst & As such, the judge rendered “no cause of losses sustained from a Dolven attorney Kyle Shoop obtained action” as to all three of the Plaintiffs’ minor-child’s serious injury. In three defense verdicts upon a trial de actions. adopting the cause of action, the novo to the bench. This matter involved Damian v. Nesbit, Court held that the same statutory alleged personal injuries from three Case No. 168900005, requirements for a spousal loss of Plaintiffs, who were brothers, after an Salt Lake County, Utah. consortium claim must be met. alleged impact between Plaintiffs’ .....................................Page 2 vehicle and a semi tractor-trailer driven by Defendant Ryan Nesbit. COLORADO In a construction defect case, the Plaintiffs initially filed their actions • against Defendant Nesbit in small claims Colorado Court of Appeals court. They alleged that the rear interpreted when “substantial driver-side of Defendant’s trailer completion” of a contractor’s impacted their vehicle as the truck made In This Issue work occurs under the builder’s a right turn onto northbound Bangerter statute of repose.
  • June 29, 2021 Chief Justice Michael K. Davis 307-777-7421 JUDI

    June 29, 2021 Chief Justice Michael K. Davis 307-777-7421 JUDI

    NEWS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE For more information contact: June 29, 2021 Chief Justice Michael K. Davis 307-777-7421 JUDICIAL NOMINATING COMMISSION ANNOUNCES VACANCY IN CIRCUIT COURT, NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT (FREMONT COUNTY) Wyoming Supreme Court Chief Justice Michael K. Davis announced today that Circuit Court Judge Robert B. Denhardt, Ninth Judicial District (Fremont County–Lander), will be retiring effective October 4, 2021. The Judicial Nominating Commission will accept expressions of interest from qualified persons to fill the vacancy through Monday, July 26, 2021. The expression of interest form can be obtained from the Supreme Court’s website, http://www.courts.state.wy.us/Administration/Careers. The completed form must be received in the office of Justice Fox no later than 5:00 p.m., on Monday, July 26, 2021. Please do not submit letters of recommendation, as the Commission will not consider them, but will instead only review documents specifically required by the Expression of Interest. Governor Mark Gordon will appoint the Ninth Judicial District Circuit Court Judge (Fremont County–Lander) from a list of three names submitted to him by the Judicial Nominating Commission. Serving on the Judicial Nominating Commission are the Chief Justice (Justice Fox as of July 1, 2021), three lawyers elected by the Wyoming State Bar: Gay Woodhouse of Cheyenne, Anna Reeves Olson of Casper, and Katherine Strike of Lander; and three non-lawyers appointed by the Governor: Gudrid Espenscheid of Big Piney, Paul Scherbel of Afton, and Dan Kirkbride of Chugwater. TO SERVE AS A CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE, ONE MUST BE A QUALIFIED ELECTOR OF THE STATE, AND AUTHORIZED TO PRACTICE LAW IN WYOMING.
  • Proposal on the Provision of Courts Services in Wales

    Proposal on the Provision of Courts Services in Wales

    Proposal on the provision of courts services in Wales Consultation Paper CP15/10 Published on 23 June 2010 This consultation will end on 15 September 2010 Proposal on the provision of courts services in Wales A consultation produced by Her Majesty's Courts Service, part of the Ministry of Justice. It is also available on the Ministry of Justice website at www.justice.gov.uk Proposal on the provision of courts services in Wales Contents The HMCS national estates strategy 3 Introduction 5 Magistrates’ courts in Dyfed Powys 7 Magistrates’ courts in Gwent 17 Magistrates’ courts in South Wales 23 Magistrates’ courts in North Wales 32 County courts in Wales 39 Annex A – Map of proposals 47 Questionnaire 49 About you 54 Contact details/How to respond 55 The consultation criteria 57 Consultation Co-ordinator contact details 58 1 Proposal on the provision of courts services in Wales 2 Proposal on the provision of courts services in Wales The HMCS national estates strategy HMCS is committed to providing a high quality courts service within a reasonable travelling distance of the communities that use it, while ensuring value for money for taxpayers. HMCS currently operates out of 530 courthouses – 330 magistrates’ courts, 219 county courts and 91 Crown Court centres.1 However, the number and location of these does not reflect changes in population, workload or transport and communication links over the years since many of them were opened. This has resulted in some courts sitting infrequently and hearing too few cases. Some buildings do not provide suitable facilities for those attending or are not fully accessible for disabled court users.
  • Kentucky Supreme Court Review

    Kentucky Supreme Court Review

    KENTUCKY SUPREME COURT REVIEW CLE Credit: 2.0 Friday, June 15, 2018 9:00 a.m. - 11:00 a.m. Bluegrass Ballroom I Lexington Convention Center Lexington, Kentucky A NOTE CONCERNING THE PROGRAM MATERIALS The materials included in this Kentucky Bar Association Continuing Legal Education handbook are intended to provide current and accurate information about the subject matter covered. No representation or warranty is made concerning the application of the legal or other principles discussed by the instructors to any specific fact situation, nor is any prediction made concerning how any particular judge or jury will interpret or apply such principles. The proper interpretation or application of the principles discussed is a matter for the considered judgment of the individual legal practitioner. The faculty and staff of this Kentucky Bar Association CLE program disclaim liability therefore. Attorneys using these materials, or information otherwise conveyed during the program, in dealing with a specific legal matter have a duty to research original and current sources of authority. Printed by: Evolution Creative Solutions 7107 Shona Drive Cincinnati, Ohio 45237 Kentucky Bar Association TABLE OF CONTENTS The Presenters ................................................................................................................. i Kentucky Supreme Court Opinions ................................................................................. 1 Administrative Law ..............................................................................................