Auckland Zoo Goes Smokefree a CASE STUDY, 2010

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Auckland Zoo Goes Smokefree a CASE STUDY, 2010 Auckland Zoo Goes Smokefree A CASE STUDY, 2010 Auckland Zoo has New Zealand’s largest collection of animals and is recognised as one of the most progressive zoos in the world. A winner of national and international environmental- related awards, it is home to 117 different species and more than 700 animals, and welcomes approximately 650,000 visitors each year. Auckland Zoo has made a significant contribution to influencing and making smokefree environments normal. The Zoo developed a smokefree policy and worked together with Cancer Society, Auckland Division to implement it. This case study illustrates a strategic partnership to create environmental and organisational change. The decision to go totally smokefree was driven by zoo visitor complaints and the public expectation that Auckland Zoo was already smokefree. There are no legislated requirements for outdoor areas such as the Zoo to be smokefree. However, there are an increasing number of parks and other public facilities that are voluntarily choosing to become smokefree. In many local councils that have designated parks smokefree, including playgrounds and sports fields, the public are very supportive of the change and there has been a high level of compliance. This case study covers some of the issues faced in the journey of Auckland Zoo going smokefree and our learnings for why this was such a successful joint venture. 1 Why did you decide to What are the details of your introduce a Smokefree policy Smokefree policy? at Auckland Zoo? There is no smoking for visitors The majority of Auckland Zoo’s visitors anywhere on the Zoo grounds. If are children and their families, so we visitors want to smoke they have think it is important to provide a healthy to leave the Zoo grounds to do so. environment where children don’t see Any visitor who is seen smoking will people smoking. Supporting this, we be approached by a member of had received feedback that many of our staff and asked to extinguish their visitors expected Auckland Zoo to be cigarette or, if they wish to continue smokefree, and some were surprised smoking, to move to an area to learn that we were not. We had also outside the Zoo. received feedback from some visitors We have introduced a designated that second-hand smoke was making smoking area outside of the main their Zoo visit less enjoyable. This entrance to try to avoid having move also supports staff presenting as groups of people smoking at the Zoo good role models, particularly when in gates. uniform and other smokefree policies in particular settings such as schools when The Zoo’s policy specifies designated What processes did you have school groups visit the zoo. smoking areas for staff within the Zoo, to go through to get the but these areas are out of sight of the Smokefree policy adopted? public. The rationale behind this was that Zoo staff can be perceived as role Initially the issue was raised by our models, particularly the Zoo Keepers Visitor Services Manager after reviewing who feature on ‘The Zoo’ television customer feedback. The issue then went show, and we did not want children to our management team who agreed who visit the Zoo to see their role with the recommendation. models smoking. We want to be a A recommendation was then put to the responsible employer and believe we Zoo Board (a committee of Auckland need to provide these designated City Council) for their endorsement. areas alongside supporting staff who There was full support for the adoption are non-smokers or staff who are of the smokefree policy. trying to quit. Was it easy to get the policy What happens if someone adopted by council? is smoking on Zoo grounds Having gained the support of the now? Zoo’s senior management team, a full If staff or volunteers see visitors to report was submitted to the Zoo Board, the Zoo smoking they will approach with relevant background, issues, and the person smoking and inform them options. We found the Council to be Why did you decide to about the Smokefree policy. The person very supportive of implementing a make the Zoo a completely smoking is directed to the designated completely Smokefree policy. In our Smokefree venue? smoking area just outside the Zoo opinion the reason why it was so well Before we implemented a Smokefree grounds which is clearly signposted. supported was because more public policy we consulted with some of the facilities are making this type Australian zoos and other New Zealand of policy change, other zoos sites who had already introduced have done it, and the public Smokefree policies. Their experience seem to expect it now. The was that a completely Smokefree policy Zoo Board opted for the was simpler to enforce than allowing Signage outside of the main gates completely Smokefree policy as smoking in designated areas within the developed by Auckland Zoo. Visitors recommended. Zoo. are asked to go to the smoking area outside of the Zoo grounds. 2 How do you let visitors to the Has the policy been easy Zoo know that you have a to enforce so far? completely Smokefree policy? The feedback we got at the launch A communications plan was put of our policy is that most people together before the Smokefree policy thought the Zoo was already was launched to ensure visitors would Smokefree so this change in policy be effectively informed about the has meant very little difference for Smokefree policy. We also made sure most Zoo visitors. that our Friends of the Zoo (annual Generally there has been excellent pass holders) knew about the change compliance with the new Smokefree through our regular monthly email policy and there have only been a updates. We looked at all the ways we few instances where staff have had already contact our visitors and tapped to remind visitors about the policy. into that e.g. the website, Friends of the Zoo newsletters, media networks, and We have had a little confusion by promotional material. We considered some visitors from overseas (who are and used all relevant methods of used to the international no smoking communication. symbol) who have interpreted the NZ Smokefree logo on signage to The Smokefree policy is noted on the indicate that you can smoke here. Zoo website in the visitor information section: http://www.aucklandZoo. co.nz/default.asp?sectionID=99, and The international is highlighted on event promotional ‘no smoking’ material and tickets. Nosymbol Smoking Please Signage was strategically placed so November 2004. Reprinted November 2009. Code HE1626 that the message was clear but did not However, when we have detract from the Zoo experience. We approached visitors and explained picked locations for signage by asking the policy we have found people staff for suggestions and from the result to be apologetic and very of a butt count to establish where compliant, and we are adapting people were commonly smoking. We our signage to prevent this confusion. chose to use the standard New Zealand What did you do to launch the How have the public Smokefree signage at the entrance and policy? also developed our own signage based responded to your new on the Smokefree logo for the front gate Smokefree policy? We decided to launch the Smokefree policy to coincide with World Smokefree and elsewhere around the Zoo. We have had great support for our new Day, May 31st. There was significant media coverage Smokefree policy. Internally to launch the policy we held of the Smokefree policy at the time of As we said, we have found that most a staff briefing and staff were offered its launch on World Smokefree Day, 31 people thought that the Zoo was packs that included some Smokefree March 2010. We also had Cancer Society already Smokefree and all other merchandise and quit information for Auckland staff and volunteers letting all feedback is that the new policy is great. Zoo staff who smoke. visitors know about the policy during We have not had any complaints from the first weekend of its launch. visitors about the Smokefree policy. To launch the policy to the general public we put out a press release (which The public response is also a reflection was very well picked up) and we had of the fact that 80% of the population volunteers from the Cancer Society don’t smoke, and that smokers are Auckland at the Zoo entrance the generally very considerate, especially weekend before World Smokefree Day when there is clear signage explaining The standard smokefree signage letting visitors know about the new where people can and can’t smoke. used throughout Zoo grounds. Smokefree policy and giving away mints and other merchandise. 3 The Zoo got a lot of media How did you work with staff to What tips could you give attention at the launch of ensure they were onboard with to others who are working the Smokefree policy. How the Smokefree policy? to implement a Smokefree did you generate this much policy? At first there were some concerns raised media? by some staff about the introduction The key for us was consulting and A joint press release was prepared of a Smokefree policy. Throughout the communicating with staff about how from Auckland Zoo and Cancer process of developing the policy, staff the policy would work and how they Society Auckland Division – along with were consulted to ensure that they could contribute to the successful individual releases. These were circulated supported the policy, understood why implementation of the policy. It was also to both agencies media networks prior the policy was being implemented important to communicate the policy to the launch event.
Recommended publications
  • Captive Management Plan for Kiwi 2010
    AUSTRALASIAN SPECIES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Species Management Captive Management Plan CAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR KIWI FINAL 2010- 2015 Draft circulated on NZ Fauna TAG listserve: 17/12/2010 Deadline for draft endorsement: 21/01/2011 Draft circulated to Kiwi Recovery Group: 26/01/2011 Deadline for KRG endorsement: 09/02/2011 Final circulated for CEOs endorsement: 10/02/2011 Final circulated to all: 03/03/2011 Photo: S. Barlow Prepared by: Suzy Barlow (Kiwi Captive Co-ordinator, Kiwi Recovery Group; Zoo and Aquarium Association New Zealand Branch) Sydney Office New Zealand Branch Queensland Branch PO Box 20 Private Bag 78700 c/o Dreamworld, Coomera Parkway Mosman NSW 2088 Grey Lynn, Auckland Coomera QLD 4209 Australia New Zealand Australia © Zoo and Aquarium Association 2011 Page 1 Final Captive Management Plan for Kiwi Contents 1 Preface ___________________________________________ Error! Bookmark not defined. 2 Introduction _____________________________________________________________ 4 3 Executive summary _______________________________________________________ 5 4 Background _____________________________________________________________ 6 5 Captive management strategy ______________________________________________ 9 6 Scope and Governance ___________________________________________________ 14 7 Programme administration ________________________________________________ 15 8 Scope of the kiwi captive management plan __________________________________ 15 9 Population Management Strategy for Brown Kiwi _____________________________ 16 10 Husbandry
    [Show full text]
  • NO2N Import Into Containment Any New Organism That Is Not Genetically Modified
    NO2N Import into containment any new organism that is not genetically modified Application title: Importation of specified “new” mammal species into containment at Wellington Zoo, and other zoos, to aid conservation though sustainable display, captive breeding and / or the conservation of genetic material Applicant organisation: Wellington Zoo Trust, 200 Daniell Street, Newtown, Wellington Please provide a brief summary of the purpose of the application (255 characters or less, including spaces) To import into containment 28 mammal species for captive breeding, display, educational presentations and to contribute to conservation by exposing visitors to conservation issues and the conservation of genetic material through breeding PLEASE CONTACT ERMA NEW ZEALAND BEFORE SUBMITTING YOUR APPLICATION Please clearly identify any confidential information and attach as a separate appendix. Please check and complete the following before submitting your application: All sections completed Yes Appendices enclosed NA Confidential information identified and enclosed separately NA Copies of references attached Yes Application signed and dated Yes Electronic copy of application e-mailed to Yes ERMA New Zealand Signed: Date: 20 Customhouse Quay Cnr Waring Taylor and Customhouse Quay PO Box 131, Wellington Phone: 04 916 2426 Fax: 04 914 0433 Email: [email protected] Website: www.ermanz.govt.nz NO2N: Application to import into containment any new organism that is not genetically modified Section One – Applicant details Name and details of the organisation
    [Show full text]
  • Download Original Attachment
    DOLI 6 Summary of Page 1 of 18 Evidence Where Evidence Recorded & How Element Proved Facts Zion Wildlife Services Ltd (ZWS) is a limited liability company having its DOLI 11/29 registered office at Zion Wildlife Gardens Ltd (ZWG) Gray Road, R D 1 Kamo, Whangarei. The nature of the business operated by ZWS appears to be that of a supplier of labour to ZWG. ZWG is a limited liability company having its registered office at Gray DOLI 11/29 Road, R D 1 Kamo, Whangarei. The nature of the business operated by ZWG is that of a zoo where paying visitors come to view and, prior to 28 May 2009, in some cases interact with some of the lions and tigers and other animals on-site. ZWG in relation to ZWS were operating as either the person in control of the place of work that makes up the operations at Gray Road, or as a principal to ZWS having engaged them as a contractor to supply ZWS employees to undertake work required to operate the ZWG facility. DOLI 11/29 Country Developments Ltd (CDL) is a limited liability company having its registered office at Zion Wildlife Gardens Ltd (ZWG) Gray Road, R D 1 Kamo, Whangarei. The nature of the business operated by CDL is that of landowner / developer and ZWG apparently leases the property at Gray Road from CDL. DOLI 11/29 On 27 May 2009 Patricia Elaine Busch (Mrs P Busch) was the Managing Director ZWS, ZWG and CDL. She was the sole shareholder for ZWS and CDL.
    [Show full text]
  • Husbandry Guidelines for African Lion Panthera Leo Class
    Husbandry Guidelines For (Johns 2006) African Lion Panthera leo Class: Mammalia Felidae Compiler: Annemarie Hillermann Date of Preparation: December 2009 Western Sydney Institute of TAFE, Richmond Course Name: Certificate III Captive Animals Course Number: RUV 30204 Lecturer: Graeme Phipps, Jacki Salkeld, Brad Walker DISCLAIMER The information within this document has been compiled by Annemarie Hillermann from general knowledge and referenced sources. This document is strictly for informational purposes only. The information within this document may be amended or changed at any time by the author. The information has been reviewed by professionals within the industry, however, the author will not be held accountable for any misconstrued information within the document. 2 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY RISKS Wildlife facilities must adhere to and abide by the policies and procedures of Occupational Health and Safety legislation. A safe and healthy environment must be provided for the animals, visitors and employees at all times within the workplace. All employees must ensure to maintain and be committed to these regulations of OHS within their workplace. All lions are a DANGEROUS/ HIGH RISK and have the potential of fatally injuring a person. Precautions must be followed when working with lions. Consider reducing any potential risks or hazards, including; Exhibit design considerations – e.g. Ergonomics, Chemical, Physical and Mechanical, Behavioural, Psychological, Communications, Radiation, and Biological requirements. EAPA Standards must be followed for exhibit design. Barrier considerations – e.g. Mesh used for roofing area, moats, brick or masonry, Solid/strong metal caging, gates with locking systems, air-locks, double barriers, electric fencing, feeding dispensers/drop slots and ensuring a den area is incorporated.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Restoraton and Community Engagement on Rotoroa Island
    WILDLIFE RESTORATON AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT ON ROTOROA ISLAND FINAL REPORT ON A WORKSHOP HELD ON ROTOROA ISLAND, 29-30 APRIL, 2013 A partnership between Auckland Zoo and the Rotoroa Island Trust will see the wildlife management and community engagement strengths of Auckland Zoo applied to the Trust’s restoration of Rotoroa Island. This will include the establishment of wildlife populations on the Island and will bring visitors to experience ecological restoration in action. Workshop Contributors Angela Bishop, Barrie Brown, Hugo Baynes, Kevin Buley, Ian Fraser, Claudine Gibson, Richard Gibson, John Gow, Natalie Hansby, Ben Hutton, Richard Jakob-Hoff, Tali Jellyman, Tim Lovegrove, Jo Ritchie, Ginnene Salisbury, Phil Salisbury, Sarah Sheeran, Glen Tupuhi, Jonathan Wilcken, Cyndy Wynn, Monique Zwaan. A contribution of the IUCN SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group and Auckland Zoo, in collaboration with the Rotoroa Island Trust. Cover photo: Rotoroa Island workshop participants. © Copyright 2013 CBSG IUCN encourages meetings, workshops and other fora for the consideration and analysis of issues related to conservation, and believes that reports of these meetings are most useful when broadly disseminated. The opinions and views expressed by the authors may not necessarily reflect the formal policies of IUCN, its Commissions, its Secretariat or its members. The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Byers, O., Lees, C., and Wilcken, J. (Eds) (2013) Wildlife Restoration and Community Engagement on Rotoroa Island: Workshop Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Business Enterprise
    38 our business enterprise Principal Areas of Activity • Zoo Admissions • Community Citizenship • Commercial Services • Corporate Relations • Retail Services • Catering Services • The Taronga Foundation • Marketing • Corporate Partnerships • Information Technology • Animal Sponsorship • Tourism • Media Relations • Graphic Design • Benchmarking • Records Management and Archives Office Taronga’s popular pair of Asian Elephants, • Risk Management male Heman and female Burma, which shared Taronga’s famous Elephant Temple for 25 years, were successfully transferred to Western Plains Zoo in May. Western Plains Zoo is now the only Zoo in Australasia to display both African and Asian Elephants, providing a unique chance for people to discover the differences between the two species. Photograph courtesy Jeff Darmanin –The Daily Telegraph 39 The Zoological Parks Board of NSW The Zoological Parks Board Goals Objectives Performance Indicators Organisational Capacity Organisational Capacity 04 05 To develop and implement • To improve business effectiveness Direct government superior systems that enable the via simplification, speed and support per visitor Zoos to adapt to new market reduced costs. conditions and identify new Taronga Zoo $16.02 $16.60 • To improve communication opportunities created by change. Western Plains Zoo $14.21 $13.80 processes. Commerce Operating expenses • To develop systems to improve Annual Report 2005 To meet financial requirements by per visitor response capacity and effectively generating support and goodwill measure performance. Taronga Zoo $28.91 $31.37 among our customers, supporters Western Plains Zoo $41.37 $43.05 and stakeholders. Commerce • To increase business volumes, Capital expenditure Community market share and revenue through per visitor To ensure our Zoos play an active innovative and competitive Taronga Zoo $13.51 $19.43 role in fostering community commercial activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Zoo Keeper Information
    ZOO KEEPER INFORMATION Auckland Zoo and its role in Conservation and Captive Breeding Programmes Revised by Kirsty Chalmers Registrar 2006 CONTENTS Introduction 3 Auckland Zoo vision, mission and strategic intent 4 The role of modern zoos 5 Issues with captive breeding programmes 6 Overcoming captive breeding problems 7 Assessing degrees of risk 8 IUCN threatened species categories 10 Trade in endangered species 12 CITES 12 The World Zoo and Aquarium Conservation Strategy 13 International Species Information System (ISIS) 15 Animal Records Keeping System (ARKS) 15 Auckland Zoo’s records 17 Identification of animals 17 What should go on daily reports? 18 Zoological Information Management System (ZIMS) 19 Studbooks and SPARKS 20 Species co-ordinators and taxon advisory groups 20 ARAZPA 21 Australasian Species Management Program (ASMP) 21 Animal transfers 22 Some useful acronyms 24 Some useful references 25 Appendices 26 Zoo Keeper Information 2006 2 INTRODUCTION The intention of this manual is to give a basic overview of the general operating environment of zoos, and some of Auckland Zoo’s internal procedures and external relationships, in particular those that have an impact on species management and husbandry. The manual is designed to be of benefit to all keepers, to offer a better understanding of the importance of captive animal husbandry and species management on a national and international level. Zoo Keeper Information 2006 3 AUCKLAND ZOO VISION Auckland Zoo will be globally acknowledged as an outstanding, progressive zoological park. AUCKLAND ZOO MISSION To focus the Zoo’s resources to benefit conservation and provide exciting visitor experiences which inspire and empower people to take positive action for wildlife and the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • PROGRESS REPORT AUCKLAND ZOO Strengthening a Consensus For
    PROGRESS REPORT AUCKLAND ZOO Strengthening a consensus for protection of Sumatran tiger in Bengkulu area of Kerinci Seblat National Park, Sumatra Lingkar Institute JULY - DECEMBER 2019 1 SUMMARY OF ACTIVITIES AND RESULTS This project was done to strengthen Sumatran tiger conservation through practical collaboration between government, religious leaders and local communities at the edge of the forest by building awareness using Islamic perspectives and values. In addition, this project also encourages local government policies to strengthen conservation works by adopting conservation education into the curriculum for junior high school students and the formation of a Human- Wildlife Conflict Mitigation Task Force. During the 6-month period of the project, much progress has been made in collaboration with the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) which actively promoted the Fatwa on Prohibition of Hunting and Trafficking of Protected Animals to local communities in the area of the project. Has visited 3 junior high schools to try out the conservation education syllabus that has been prepared in the project during the previous project period. The teachers and the Department of Education responded very enthusiastically to the plan for adoption of conservation education as one of the subjects to be formally deployed in junior high schools considering that geographically, 70% of Lebong Regency's territory is a forest area. In the field, by utilizing the information network from the local community, the Lingkar Team has carried out eight SMART Patrols with a total distance of 310 Km and has found and cleaned 9 inactive prey. In addition, the information was also used for investigative purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Glob Bal Cons Ervation N Netwo Rk & CPS SG Con Servatio on Coun Ncil
    Global Conservation Network & CPSSG Conservation Council These generous contributors make the work of GCN & CPSG possible $50,000 and above Linda Malek $250 and above Milwaukee County Zoo Omaha’s Henry Doorly Zoo & the Omaha North Carolina Zoological Park African Safari, France Zoo Foundation Oregon Zoo Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum The Estate of George B. Rabb Paignton Zoo Julia Hanuliakova & Zoo Design, Inc. Rotterdam Zoo Lee Richardson Zoo $25,000 and above Royal Zoological Society of Antwerp Lion Country Safari Royal Zoological Society of Scotlland Roger Williams Park Zoo Copenhagen Zoo* Sedgwick County Zoo Rolling Hills Zoo Disney’s Animal Kingdom Seoul Zoo Sacramento Zoo Environment Agency - Abu Dhabi Lee & Marie Simmons Steinhart Aquarium Minnesota Zoological Garden Swedish Association of Zoologicaal Parks Jacqueline & Nick Vlietstra -Office Sponsor & Aquaria (SAZA) Saint Louis Zoo Taipei Zoo $100 and above Twycross Zoo Alpenzoo Innsbruck $15,000 and above Verband der Zoologischen Garten (VdZ) Jim Guenter Wilhelma Zoo Auckland Zoological Park Vicky Meretsky Woodland Park Zoo Balcombe Charitable Trust Steven J. Olson Zoo Frankfurt Chester Zoo* Kathryn Rodriguez-Clark Zoological Society of Wales, Welsh Chicago Zoological Society* Martín Zordan Mountain Zoo Zoo Zürich* Zoologischer Garten Köln Zoos South Australia $20 and abovve $10,000 and above David Barnard Brad & Alice Andrews* $1,000 and above Richard Frankham Columbus Zoo & Aquarium - The WILDS Connor Killilea for Eloise Sundal Dallas World Aquarium* Aalborg Zoo Nancy Sather
    [Show full text]
  • Secondary Zoo Lesson Plan
    Secondary Zoo Lesson plan Theme: Secondary (ages 12-17) CLASSIFICATION How scientists group living things to help make sense of What will I learn: the natural world. Inspire Create Check out the Auckland Zoo Animal Pages on Create your own classification key for your family and friends our website. Look at the different categories of to solve. animals. Create an acrostic poem or mnemonic rhyme to remember the - How many subpages are there from the main order of the classification tree – Kingdom, Phylum, Class, Order, animal page? Family, Genus, Species - Why do you think these subpages were created? - Are these subpages helpful? Why or why not? - How many different species of animal are there at AZ? - Can you find out approximately how many individual animals there are at AZ? With so many animals on Earth, it can be Explore helpful to put them into groups. Watch this BrainPOP video to learn how scientists classify Explore how the classification system we use came about by animals as either mammals, birds, fish, reptiles, watching this video - Taxonomy: Life’s Filing System. amphibians and invertebrates! Solve the Classification Puzzle (resource attached). Animals are so incredibly unique that it is difficult to find a classification system that can group them all perfectly. We usually classify animals as either mammal, fish, bird, Reflect reptile, amphibian or invertebrate based on certain criteria. But there are always exceptions to the criteria. Watch this TED ed video – Why is Biodiversity so Important?. Thinking about what you’ve Do a little research online to find out about these super learned about scientific classification and interesting exceptions.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual HSNO Enforcement Report 2017
    Report to the Minister for the Environment Enforcement of the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996 December 2017 www.epa.govt.nz Report on enforcement of the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996 Table of Contents Purpose................................................................................................................................................... 3 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 6 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 6 Working Safer Reforms ......................................................................................................................... 6 Enforcement Agency Activities and Intentions .................................................................................. 8 Ministry for Primary Industries ....................................................................................................... 8 WorkSafe New Zealand .............................................................................................................. 16 Ministry of Health ......................................................................................................................... 24 New Zealand Transport
    [Show full text]
  • Governance Structures for Wellington Zoo
    Governance Structures for Wellington Zoo A REPORT PREPARED FOR THE WELLINGTON CITY COUNCIL BY MCKINLAY DOUGLAS LIMITED June 2002 36-42 GreySt P O Box 13 125, Tauranga Tel: (07) 579 4217 Fax: (07) 579 4218 www.mdl.co.nz email: [email protected] Contents Page Introduction........................................................................................................ 1 Background........................................................................................................ 2 Status...........................................................................................................................2 Town Belt .....................................................................................................................2 Public Attitudes.............................................................................................................3 Strategic Direction........................................................................................................3 Redevelopment ............................................................................................................3 Method of Approach ......................................................................................... 5 Governance........................................................................................................ 6 Reasons .......................................................................................................................6 Principles of Good Governance....................................................................................7
    [Show full text]