A Systematic Approach to Differentiating Joint Disorders A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Systematic Approach to Differentiating Joint Disorders A MedicalContinuing Education PODIATRIC RADIOGRAPHY Objectives After completing this mate- rial the reader shall be able to: 1) List the radiographic criteria for systematically evaluating joints and joint disease. 2) Define: joint effusion, AA SystematicSystematic arthritis mutilans, and en- thesopathy. 3) List common joint dis- ApproachApproach toto orders that are associated with arthritis. 4) Explain the importance DifferentiatingDifferentiating of a lesion (erosion, for exam- ple) having either a well- defined or ill-defined margin. JointJoint DisordersDisorders 5) List target areas in the foot and calcaneus for com- X-rays can be an important mon arthritic disorders. 6) Distinguish between tool in confirming your the joint disorders (based diagnosis. on radiographic findings). Welcome to Podiatry Management’s CME Instructional program. Our journal has been approved as a sponsor of Contin- uing Medical Education by the Council on Podiatric Medical Education. You may enroll: 1) on a per issue basis (at $17.50 per topic) or 2) per year, for the special introductory rate of $109 (you save $66). You may submit the answer sheet, along with the other information requested, via mail, fax, or phone. In the near future, you may be able to submit via the Internet. If you correctly answer seventy (70%) of the questions correctly, you will receive a certificate attesting to your earned cred- its. You will also receive a record of any incorrectly answered questions. If you score less than 70%, you can retake the test at no additional cost. A list of states currently honoring CPME approved credits is listed on pg. 246. Other than those entities cur- rently accepting CPME-approved credit, Podiatry Management cannot guarantee that these CME credits will be acceptable by any state licensing agency, hospital, managed care organization or other entity. PM will, however, use its best efforts to ensure the widest acceptance of this program possible. This instructional CME program is designed to supplement, NOT replace, existing CME seminars. The goal of this program is to advance the knowledge of practicing podiatrists. We will endeavor to publish high quality manuscripts by noted authors and researchers. If you have any questions or comments about this program, you can write or call us at: Podiatry Management, P.O. Box 490, East Islip, NY 11730, (631) 563-1604 or e-mail us at [email protected]. An answer sheet and full set of instructions are provided on pages 246-248.—Editor By Robert A. Christman, D.P.M. out question, osteoarthritis is the not unusual for the inflammatory most common, primarily because rheumatic diseases (rheumatoid everal arthritides (types of of the mechanical wear and tear arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, anky- arthritis) have a predilection that weight-bearing activities losing spondylitis, and Reiter’s Sfor the foot (Table 1). With- place on cartilage. However, it is Continued on page 186 www.podiatrym.com APRIL/MAY 2004 • PODIATRY MANAGEMENT 185 Joint Disorders... The archetypal radiographic consider the probable differential presentations of joint disorders diagnoses. Continuingsyndrome) to first appear or that have been described in the be diagnosed in the feet. Fur- literature are not necessarily what Systematic Approach to Medical Education thermore, gouty arthritis and dia- the clinician encounters in every- Differentiating Joint Disorders betic neuropathic osteoarthropa- day practice. The classic picture is A detailed, systematic ap- thy target have a predilection for typically the patient who was di- proach for evaluating pedal joints the foot. agnosed with the joint disease entails three considerations2 many years or even decades ago. In contrast, the patient with acute symptomatology may ini- TABLE 1 tially come for help at the onset of disease or soon thereafter. In To maximize the Joint Disorders such a case, the radiographic detection of early findings are frequently subtle and Affecting nonspecific, the clinical findings arthritis, you “must the Foot are vague, and the diagnosis is know how to look, often elusive. Furthermore, atypi- where to look, and what Osteoarthritis cal cases are common. The chal- lenge, therefore, is to identify the Rheumatoid arthritis to look for.” subtle, early radiographic find- Psoriatic arthritis ings, because the classic features Reiter’s syndrome of a particular joint disorder do Ankylosing spondylitis not manifest until many years later. To maximize the detection (Table 2). For obvious reasons, the Gouty arthritis of early arthritis, you “must know symptomatic joint or joints are as- Neuropathic osteoarthropathy how to look, where to look, and sessed first. The asymptomatic Septic arthritis what to look for.”1 Then, along joints of both extremities should with the clinical and other labo- also be evaluated, for two reasons: ratory findings, you must list and Most joint disorders target both extremities, and joints may be af- fected that are clinically asymp- tomatic. (Joint disease is one of TABLE 2 the few conditions that warrants performing a bilateral radiograph- A Systematic Approach to Evaluating ic study.) The examination does- n’t stop here, however. Sites dis- Joint Disease tant from involved joints, osseous and soft tissue are also considered. Roentgen features at or adjacent to involved joints Abnormal findings at the cal- Primary findings caneal entheses and heel pain, for Osseous erosion example, can be associated with New bone formation joint disease. Finally, the distribu- Joint space alteration tion of radiographic findings must 3 Secondary findings be assessed for specific patterns. Many articular disorders demon- Soft tissue edema strate characteristic patterns of Calcification joint involvement that help dis- Geographic rarefaction tinguish one disease from another. Alignment abnormalities Articular disorders affecting Roentgen features at sites distant from involved joints the foot may involve one or mul- Erosion tiple joints. Monoarticular joint Enthesopathy disease is generally attributed to either trauma, infection, or acute Soft tissue mass gouty arthritis (Table 3). Less com- Patterns of joint disease according to distribution of roentgen findings mon causes of pedal monoarticu- Joints involved lar disease include rheumatoid Targeted joints monoarthritis and pigmented vil- Bilateral versus unilateral lonodular synovitis. Examples of Symmetry versus asymmetry polyarticular joint disorders affect- Extra-articular sites involved ing the foot include osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, seronegative Continued on page 187 186 PODIATRY MANAGEMENT • APRIL/MAY 2004 www.podiatrym.com MedicalContinuing Education the atrophic joint disor- ders. A subdivision of this TABLE 3 group is commonly associated with an adjacent soft tissue mass Causes of Joint Disease clinically and the preservation of joint space. Forrester and Brown have used the term “lumpy-bumpy” joint Monoarticular disease to characterize this latter Trauma group..4 Infection Neuropathic osteoarthropathy is Crystal deposition divided into two subtypes: forefoot, Gout and the combined midfoot and tar- CPPD sus. Its radiographic features vary de- Rheumatoid monoarthritis pending on location: Forefoot sites exhibit findings characteristic of at- Pigmented villonodular synovitis rophic joint disease; the midfoot and Polyarticular tarsal sites display features of detritus Osteoarthritis (hypertrophic) arthritis. Rheumatoid arthritis Each of the roentgen features Seronegative arthritis associated with joint disease is dis- cussed individually in the following Chronic tophaceous gout sections. Remember the radio- Neuropathic osteoarthropathy graphic categories of joint disor- Pigmented villonodular synovitis (midfoot) ders; you can recognize associations Multiple reticulohistiocytosis between certain roentgen findings and arthritis categories, improving your diagnostic acumen. arthritis (psoriatic arthritis, anky- ing pathologic processes: losing spondylitis, and Reiter’s syn- degenerative, inflamma- drome), neuropathic osteoarthropa- tory, and metabolic4 thy, and chronic tophaceous gout. (Table 4). This classifica- Differentiation of joint disorders tion, unfortunately, does can be simplified by applying a gener- not include neuropathic al classification system to the present- osteoarthropathy. In ing features. One categorization of 1904, Goldthwaite used arthritis has been based on underly- radiographic criteria to distinguish between os- teoarthritis and rheuma- toid arthritis.5 These crite- TABLE 4 ria can be expanded to include the remaining Categories of forms of pedal arthritis. Joint disorders affect- Joint Disease ing the foot can be divid- (based on underlying ed into two radiographic categories, based on the pathology) predominant radiograph- ic feature: hypertrophic Degenerative and atrophic (Table 5). Osteoarthritis Hypertrophic joint dis- Figure 1. Irregular, ill-defined erosion (ankylosing Inflammatory ease features bone over- spondylitis). Rheumatoid arthritis growth and enlargement. The characteristic findings are sub- Roentgen Features at Involved Seronegative arthritis chondral sclerosis and osteophyte for- Joints: Primary Findings Psoriatic arthritis mation at the margin of a joint. Detri- Reiter’s disease tus arthritis, a subcategory of hyper- Osseous Erosion Ankylosing spondylitis trophic arthritis, includes those disor- Bone erosion is a primary fea- ders that exhibit fragmentation in ad- ture of all joint disorders except Septic arthritis dition to exaggerated hypertrophic
Recommended publications
  • Rheuma.Stamp Line&Box
    Arthritis Mutilans: A Report from the GRAPPA 2012 Annual Meeting Vinod Chandran, Dafna D. Gladman, Philip S. Helliwell, and Björn Gudbjörnsson ABSTRACT. Arthritis mutilans is often described as the most severe form of psoriatic arthritis. However, a widely agreed on definition of the disease has not been developed. At the 2012 annual meeting of the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA), members hoped to agree on a definition of arthritis mutilans and thus facilitate clinical and molecular epidemiological research into the disease. Members discussed the clinical features of arthritis mutilans and defini- tions used by researchers to date; reviewed data from the ClASsification for Psoriatic ARthritis study, the Nordic psoriatic arthritis mutilans study, and the results of a premeeting survey; and participated in breakout group discussions. Through this exercise, GRAPPA members developed a broad consensus on the features of arthritis mutilans, which will help us develop a GRAPPA-endorsed definition of arthritis mutilans. (J Rheumatol 2013;40:1419–22; doi:10.3899/ jrheum.130453) Key Indexing Terms: OSTEOLYSIS ANKYLOSIS PENCIL-IN-CUP SUBLUXATION FLAIL JOINT ARTHRITIS MUTILANS Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an inflammatory musculoskeletal gists as a severe destructive form of PsA, a precise disease specifically associated with psoriasis. Moll and definition has not yet been universally accepted. The earliest Wright defined PsA as “psoriasis associated with inflam- definition of arthritis mutilans was provided
    [Show full text]
  • Psoriatic Arthritis Howard Duncan
    Henry Ford Hospital Medical Journal Volume 13 | Number 2 Article 6 6-1965 Psoriatic Arthritis Howard Duncan Darrell Oberg William R. Eyler Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.henryford.com/hfhmedjournal Part of the Life Sciences Commons, Medical Specialties Commons, and the Public Health Commons Recommended Citation Duncan, Howard; Oberg, Darrell; and Eyler, William R. (1965) "Psoriatic Arthritis," Henry Ford Hospital Medical Bulletin : Vol. 13 : No. 2 , 173-181. Available at: https://scholarlycommons.henryford.com/hfhmedjournal/vol13/iss2/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Henry Ford Health System Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Henry Ford Hospital Medical Journal by an authorized editor of Henry Ford Health System Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Henry Ford Hosp. Med. Bull. Vol. 13, June, 1965 PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS* HOWARD DUNCAN, M.D.,** DARRELL OBERG, M.D.,** AND WILLIAM R. EYLER, M.D.*** Dr. Howard Duncan. It is apparent from these meetings that rheumatologists are not alone in having troubles with dissension amongst the hierarchy in arriving at a decision as to whether a disease exists or not. The problem is the relationship between arthritis and psoriasis. Our first approach will be to demonstrate that there is an entity "psoriatic arthritis" which is distinct from rheumatoid arthritis with psoriasis. I'll ask Dr. Oberg to illustrate the situation. Dr. Darrell Oberg. Our patient is a 49 year old white female who was first .seen in this hospital in 1960, at which time she was admitted with malignant hypertension, which has subsequently been controlled by treatment prescribed in the Hypertension Division.
    [Show full text]
  • Spondyloarthropathies and Reactive Arthritis
    RHEUMATOLOGY SPONDYLOARTHRITIS ROBERT L. DIGIOVANNI, DO, FACOI PROGRAM DIRECTOR LMC RHEUMATOLOGY FELLOWSHIP [email protected] DISCLOSURES •NONE SERONEGATIVE SPONDYLOARTHROPATHIES SLIDES PREPARED BY GENE JALBERT, DO SENIOR RHEUMATOLOGY FELLOW THE SPONDYLOARTHROPATHIES: • Ankylosing Spondylitis (A.S.) • Non-radiographic Axial spondyloarthropathies (nr-axSpA) • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) • Inflammatory Bowel Disease Associated (Enteropathic) • Crohn and Ulcerative Colitis • +/- Microscopic colitis • Reactive Arthritis (ReA) • Juvenile-Onset SpA • Others: Bechet’s dz, Celiac, Whipples, pouchitis. THE FAMOUS VENN DIAGRAM: SPONDYLOARTHROPATHY: • First case of Axial SpA was reported in 1691 however some believe Ramses II has A.S. • 2.4 million adults in the United States have Seronegative SpA • Compare with RA, which affects about 1.3 million Americans • Prevalence variation for A.S.: Europe (0.12-1%), Asia (0.17%), Latin America (0.1%), Africa (0.07%), USA (0.34%). • Pathophysiology in general: • Responsible Interleukins: IL-12, IL17, IL-22, and IL23. SPONDYLOARTHROPATHY: • Axial SpA: • Radiographic (Sacroiliitis seen on X- ray) • No Radiographic features non- radiographic SpA (nr-SpA) • Nr-SpA was formally known as undifferentiated SpA • Peripheral SpA: • Enthesitis, dactylitis and arthritis • Eventually evolves into a specific diagnosis A.S., PsA, etc. • Can be a/w IBD, HLA-B27 positivity, uveitis SHARED CLINICAL FEATURES: • Axial joint disease (especially SI joints) • Asymmetrical Oligoarthritis (2-4 joints). • Dactylitis (Sausage
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Tofacitinib in Early Arthritis-Induced Bone Loss in an Adjuvant-Induced Arthritis Rat Model
    Effects of tofacitinib in early arthritis-induced bone loss in an adjuvant-induced arthritis rat model Vidal B.1, Cascão R.1, Finnilä MA.2,3, IP. Lopes1, da Glória VG.1, Saarakkala S.2,4, Zioupos P.5, Canhão H.6, Fonseca JE.1,7 1 Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal; 2 Research Unit of Medical Imaging, Physics and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland; 3 Department of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland; 4 Medical Research Center, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland; 5 Biomechanics Labs, Cranfield Forensic Institute, Cranfield University, DA of the UK; ; 6 EpiDoC Unit, CEDOC, NOVA Medical School, NOVA University, Lisbon, Portugal; 7 Rheumatology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Norte, EPE, Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon Academic Medical Centre, Lisbon, Portugal ABSTRACT Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) causes immune mediated local and systemic bone damage. Objectives - The main goal of this work was to analyze, how treatment intervention with tofacitinib prevents the early disturbances on bone structure and mechanics in adjuvant induced arthritis rat model. This is the first study to access the impact of tofacitinib on the systemic bone effects of inflammation. Methods - Fifty Wistar adjuvant-induced arthritis (AIA) rats were randomly housed in experimental groups, as follows: non-arthritic healthy group (N=20), arthritic non-treated (N=20) and 10 animals under tofacitinib treatment. Rats were monitored during 22 days after disease induction for the inflammatory score, ankle perimeter and body weight. Healthy non-arthritic rats were used as controls for comparison. After 22 days of disease progression rats were sacrificed and bone samples were collected for histology, micro computed tomography (micro-CT), 3-point bending and nanoindentation analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rheumatoid Thumb
    THE RHEUMATOID THUMB BY ANDREW L. TERRONO, MD The thumb is frequently involved in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Thumb postures can be grouped into a number of deformities. Deformity is determined by a complex interaction of the primary joint, the adjacent joints, and tendon function and integrity. Joints adjacent to the primarily affected one usually assume an opposite posture. If they do not, tendon ruptures should be suspected. Surgical treatment is individualized for each patient and each joint, with consideration given to adjacent joints. The treatment consists of synovectomy, capsular reconstruction, tendon reconstruction, joint stabilization, arthrodesis, or arthroplasty. Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand he majority of patients with rheumatoid ar- ring between the various joints. Any alteration of thritis will develop thumb involvement.1,2,3 posture at one level has an effect on the adjacent joint. TThe deformities encountered in the rheuma- The 6 patterns of thumb postures described here, toid patient are varied and are the result of changes unfortunately, do not exhaust the deformities one taking place both intrinsically and extrinsically to the encounters in rheumatoid arthritis (Table 1). It is thumb. Synovial hypertrophy within the individual possible, for example, for the patient to stretch the thumb joints leads not only to destruction of articular supporting structures of a joint, causing a flexion, cartilage, but can also stretch out the supporting extension, or lateral deformity. However, instead of collateral ligaments and joint capsules. As a result, the adjacent joint assuming the opposite posture, it each joint can become unstable and react to the may assume an abnormal position secondary to a stresses applied to it both in function against the other tendon rupture.
    [Show full text]
  • Imaging in Psoriatic Arthritis
    Review Standardizing the monitoring of outcome measures: imaging in psoriatic arthritis The wide spectrum of manifestations of musculoskeletal inflammation in psoriatic arthritis makes standardized assessment of joint damage in psoriatic arthritis a challenge. Assessment of erosions and joint space narrowing on plain radiographs of the hands and feet has remained the benchmark for assessing damage in psoriatic arthritis. The methods used to assess damage have been mostly borrowed from those used in rheumatoid arthritis. Axial joint involvement has not been systematically addressed. Methods to assess spinal disease have been borrowed from those used in ankylosing spondylitis. Both ultrasound and MRI have demonstrated promise in the assessment of psoriatic arthritis. The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials (OMERACT) group is involved in the development of valid, reliable and feasible methods for assessment of joint involvement in psoriatic arthritis. † KEYWORDS: inflammation n joint damage n MRI n psoriasis n radiography Dafna D Gladman n spondylitis n ultrasonography n validation & Vinod Chandran1 1Psoriatic Arthritis Program, University Health Network, 1E 412, 399 Bathurst Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an inflammatory and validates outcome measures in rheumato- Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2S8, musculo skeletal disease associated with psoria- logy, identified several measures that should be Canada †Author for correspondence: sis [1]. Psoriasis is an inflammatory, immune- assessed in patients with PsA [6]. These include University
    [Show full text]
  • Pathogenesis of Bone Erosions in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Not Only
    Rossini et al. J Rheum Dis Treat 2015, 1:2 ISSN: 2469-5726 Journal of Rheumatic Diseases and Treatment Review Article: Open Access Pathogenesis of Bone Erosions in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Not Only Inflammation Maurizio Rossini*, Angelo Fassio, Luca Idolazzi, Ombretta Viapiana, Elena Fracassi, Giovanni Adami, Maria Rosaria Povino, Maria Vitiello and Davide Gatti Department of Medicine, Rheumatology Unit, University of Verona, Italy *Corresponding author: Maurizio Rossini, Department of Medicine, Rheumatology Unit, Policlinico Borgo Roma, Piazzale Scuro, 10, 37134, Verona, Italy, Tel: +390458126770, Fax: +39O458126881, E-mail: [email protected] patients has evidence of focal bone erosions [3]. This phenomenon Abstract is the result of many complex interactions from the cells and the It is a matter of fact that the inflammatory pathogenesis does not cytokines/chemokines system at the synovial and surrounding explain all the skeletal manifestations of Rheumatoid Arthritis tissues level, which culminates with bone destruction. In addition (RA), and the development of bone involvement is sometimes unconnected from the clinical scores of inflammation. On the to the articular crumbling, RA is also associated with a generalized basis of recent studies, we would like to make a point of the new bone loss with a higher prevalence of osteoporosis: RA patients have available evidence about the metabolic pathogenic component double the normal risk of undergoing a femoral fracture [4] and they of bone erosions. We assume that in this process an additional are 4 times more likely to have vertebral fractures [5,6]. Both erosions role could be played by metabolic factors, such as the parathyroid and systemic osteoporosis are related to the unbalance between hormone (PTH), DKK1 (the inhibitor of the Wnt/β catenin pathway) osteoblasts and osteoclasts activity [7,8].
    [Show full text]
  • IL-1Β-Driven Osteoclastogenic T Regulatory Cells Accelerate Bone Erosion in Arthritis
    IL-1β-driven osteoclastogenic T regulatory cells accelerate bone erosion in arthritis Anaïs Levescot, … , Julia F. Charles, Peter A. Nigrovic J Clin Invest. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI141008. Research In-Press Preview Autoimmunity Inflammation Graphical abstract Find the latest version: https://jci.me/141008/pdf Osteoclastogenic Tregs IL-1-driven osteoclastogenic T regulatory cells accelerate bone erosion in arthritis Anaïs Levescot1, Margaret H. Chang1,2, Julia Schnell1,3, Nathan Nelson-Maney1, Jing Yan1,4, Marta Martínez-Bonet1, Ricardo Grieshaber-Bouyer1, Pui Y. Lee1,2, Kevin Wei1, Rachel B. Blaustein1, Allyn Morris1, Alexandra Wactor1, Yoichiro Iwakura5, James A. Lederer6, Deepak A. Rao1, Julia F. Charles1,4, and Peter A. Nigrovic1,2 1Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston MA, USA 2Division of Immunology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston MA, USA 3Department of Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany 4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston MA, USA 5Center for Experimental Animal Models, Research Institute for Science & Technology, Tokyo University of Science, Tokyo, Japan 6Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston MA, USA Correspondence: Peter A. Nigrovic, MD Chief, Division of Immunology Boston Children’s Hospital Karp Family Research Building, Room 10211 One Blackfan Circle Boston, MA 02115 Ph: 617-905-1373 Email: [email protected] All authors declare no related conflicts of interest. 1 Osteoclastogenic Tregs Abstract IL-1 is a pro-inflammatory mediator with roles in innate and adaptive immunity. Here we show that IL-1 contributes to autoimmune arthritis by inducing osteoclastogenic capacity in T regulatory cells (Tregs).
    [Show full text]
  • Drug Class Review on Targeted Immune Modulators
    Drug Class Review on Targeted Immune Modulators Final Report December 2005 The purpose of this report is to make available information regarding the comparative effectiveness and safety profiles of different drugs within pharmaceutical classes. Reports are not usage guidelines, nor should they be read as an endorsement of, or recommendation for, any particular drug, use or approach. Oregon Health & Science University does not recommend or endorse any guideline or recommendation developed by users of these reports. Gerald Gartlehner, MD, MPH Richard A. Hansen, PhD Patricia Thieda, MA Beth Jonas, MD Kathleen N. Lohr, PhD Tim Carey, MD, MPH Produced by RTI-UNC Evidence-based Practice Center Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 725 Airport Road, CB# 7590 Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7590 Tim Carey, MD, MPH, Director Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center Mark Helfand, MD, MPH, Director Copyright © 2005 by Oregon Health & Science University Portland, Oregon 97201. All rights reserved Final Report Drug Effectiveness Review Project TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction............................................................................................................................................... 6 Scope and Key Questions ............................................................................................................. 12 Methods
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Presentation of Psoriatic Arthritis Among Sudanese: Hospital Based Study
    International Journal of Research Article Clinical Rheumatology Clinical presentation of psoriatic arthritis among sudanese: hospital based study Back ground: Psoriasis is a common papulo-squamous disorder affecting 2% of the population and Nasereldin Hamednalla Elasha is characterized by well demarcated red scaly plaques. Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) may be defined as Hamednalla1,2,3,4, El nour an inflammatory arthritis which is seronegative for Rheumatoid Factor (RF) and enthesitis that is Mohammed El agib1, 2, Safi associated with psoriasis. The aims of our study is to identify different clinical presentations and Eldin Elnour Ali5, Mohammed types of psoriatic arthritis. Elmujtba Adam Essa*6 Methods: This is a descriptive cross sectional hospital based study conducted at Omdurman military 1Department of Internal Medicine and Rheumatology, Omdurman Military Hospital, hospital, Khartoum, Sudan, for a period of six months. The study included 96 patients confirm Omdurman, Khartoum, Sudan diagnosed by dermatologist as psoriasis, the data obtain with designed questionnaire contains the 2Department of Rheumatology, Sudan clinical presentations of the disease, lab result and radiological imaging, the study analyzed by SPSS Medical Specializations Board, Khartoum, v.20 by using one way a nova method to determine the P. value. Sudan 3Department of internal Medicine, Karary Results: From the total number of patients with Psoriasis, more than one third was psoriatic arthritis, University, Omdurman, Khartoum, Sudan 4Department of Internal Medicine, Ahfad 6% of patients with psoriatic arthritis were oligo-arthritis joint involvements, 14% were polyarthritis, university, Omdurman, Khartoum, Sudan 9% were distal inter phalangeal joint, 9% were spondylitis/sacroillitis and the remaining 5% were 5Department of Dermatology, Omdurman arthritis mutilants.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Plan – November 2016
    American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF) Psoriatic Arthritis Guideline Project Plan – November 2016 PARTICIPANTS Core Oversight Team Veronica Richardson, NP Jasvinder Singh, MD, MPH (Principal Investigator, Jose Scher, MD Voting Panel Leader) Evan Siegel, MD James Reston, MD (Literature Review Leader) Michael Siegel, PhD Dafna Gladman, MD (Content Expert) Ingrid Steinkoenig Alexis Ogdie, MD, MSCE (Content Expert) Jessica Walsh, MD Gordon Guyatt, MD (GRADE Expert) Patient Panel Literature Review Team Eddie Applegate Helena Jonsson, MD Gail C. Richardson Amit Aakash Shah, MD, MPH Hilary Wilson Nancy Sullivan, BA Marat Turgunbaev, MD, MPH ACR Staff Robin Lane Voting Panel Amy S. Miller Chad Deal, MD Regina Parker Atul Deodhar, MD Deborah Desir, MD NPF Staff Maureen Dubreuil, MD Emily Boyd Jonathan Dunham, MD Elaine Husni, MD, MPH ECRI Institute Staff Sarah Kenny Karen Schoelles, MD Paula Marchetta, MD, MBA Phil Mease, MD Julie Miner, PT Christopher Ritchlin, MD, MPH Ben Smith, PA-C Abby Van Voorhees, MD Expert Panel Laura Coates, MD Marina Magrey, MD Joseph Merola, MD, MMSC Ben Nowell, PhD Ana-Maria Orbai, MD Soumya Reddy, MD 1 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF) Psoriatic Arthritis Guideline Project Plan – November 2016 1 2 ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP AND SUPPORT 3 4 This collaborative project of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and the National Psoriasis 5 Foundation has the broad objective of developing an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the 6 management of psoriatic arthritis (PsA), not covering skin manifestations of psoriasis. 7 8 BACKGROUND 9 10 Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory arthritis associated with psoriasis.
    [Show full text]
  • Distinguishing Rheumatoid Arthritis from Psoriatic Arthritis
    Psoriatic arthritis RMD Open: first published as 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000656 on 13 August 2018. Downloaded from REVIEW Distinguishing rheumatoid arthritis from psoriatic arthritis Joseph F Merola,1 Luis R Espinoza,2 Roy Fleischmann3 To cite: Merola JF, Espinoza LR, ABSTRACT Key messages Fleischmann R. Distinguishing Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) rheumatoid arthritis from have key differences in clinical presentation, radiographic What is already known about this subject? psoriatic arthritis. RMD Open findings, comorbidities and pathogenesis to distinguish Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis 2018;4:e000656. doi:10.1136/ between these common forms of chronic inflammatory ► rmdopen-2018-000656 (PsA) are both common chronic inflammatory dis- arthritis. Joint involvement is typically, but not always, eases, and differentiation of these conditions can be asymmetric in PsA, while it is predominantly symmetric in challenging. ► Prepublication history for RA. Bone erosions, without new bone growth, and cervical this paper is available online. spine involvement are distinctive of RA, while axial spine To view these files, please visit What does this study add? involvement, psoriasis and nail dystrophy are distinctive ► We review key differences in clinical, serological, ra- the journal online (http://dx. doi. of PsA. Patients with PsA typically have seronegative test org/ 10. 1136/ rmdopen- 2018- diographic and pathogenic features of RA and PsA, findings for rheumatoid factor (RF) and cyclic citrullinated 000656). and provide practical guidance for achieving a cor- peptide (CCP) antibodies, while approximately 80% of rect diagnosis. Received 31 January 2018 patients with RA have positive findings for RF and CCP Revised 25 May 2018 antibodies.
    [Show full text]