DOCSLIB.ORG

Catchments and Local Government Areas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Catchments and Local Government Areas Threatened Species Section Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Threatened plants within the Local Government Area: Central Highlands Tas LGA Species Common name Endemic TSP Act EPBC Act LGA % Count Count Acacia axillaris midlands wattle end v VU 541 64 11.8 Acacia siculiformis dagger wattle r 76 27 35.5 Agrostis australiensis southern bent r 11 4 36.4 Agrostis diemenica flatleaf southern bent end r 11 7 63.6 Amphibromus fluitans floating swampgrass i? VU 2 1 50.0 Amphibromus neesii southern swampgrass r 30 2 6.7 Anogramma leptophylla annual fern v 17 2 11.8 Aphelia pumilio dwarf fanwort r 140 1 0.7 Argyrotegium fordianum soft cottonleaf r 7 6 85.7 Argyrotegium nitidulum shining cottonleaf VU 2 1 50.0 Argyrotegium poliochlorum greygreen cottonleaf r 31 1 3.2 Arthropodium strictum chocolate lily r 969 5 0.5 Asperula minima mossy woodruff r 56 7 12.5 Asperula scoparia subsp. scoparia prickly woodruff r 158 45 28.5 Asperula subsimplex water woodruff r 47 10 21.3 Australopyrum velutinum velvet wheatgrass r 10 4 40.0 Austrostipa bigeniculata doublejointed speargrass r 114 2 1.8 Austrostipa nodosa knotty speargrass r 621 19 3.1 Austrostipa scabra rough speargrass r 171 10 5.8 Austrostipa scabra subsp. falcata sickle speargrass r* 317 18 5.7 Austrostipa scabra subsp. scabra rough speargrass r* 42 4 9.5 Barbarea australis riverbed wintercress end e CR 127 78 61.4 Baumea gunnii slender twigsedge r 77 26 33.8 Botrychium australe parsley fern x 1 1 100.0 Brachyscome radicata spreading daisy tas r 14 5 35.7 Brachyscome rigidula cutleaf daisy v 56 6 10.7 Caesia calliantha blue grasslily r 243 5 2.1 Callitriche umbonata winged waterstarwort r 7 1 14.3 Calocephalus lacteus milky beautyheads r 245 50 20.4 Threatened plants within the Central Highlands Local Government Area (1 July 2013) 1 of 5 Threatened Species Section Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Tas LGA Species Common name Endemic TSP Act EPBC Act LGA % Count Count Carex capillacea yellowleaf sedge r 11 7 63.6 Carex gunniana mountain sedge r 50 8 16.0 Carex longebrachiata drooping sedge r 272 48 17.6 Carex tasmanica curly sedge VU 336 45 13.4 Colobanthus curtisiae grassland cupflower r VU 387 335 86.6 Colobanthus pulvinatus cushion cupflower r 12 2 16.7 Corunastylis nuda tiny midge-orchid r 78 3 3.8 Cryptandra amara pretty pearlflower e 86 28 32.6 Cynoglossum australe coast houndstongue r 882 3 0.3 Deyeuxia brachyathera short bentgrass r 10 5 50.0 Deyeuxia densa heath bentgrass r 68 1 1.5 Deyeuxia minor small bentgrass r 33 1 3.0 Dianella amoena grassland flaxlily r EN 493 8 1.6 Discaria pubescens spiky anchorplant e 308 298 96.8 Epacris acuminata claspleaf heath end VU 412 193 46.8 Epilobium willisii carpet willowherb r 50 36 72.0 Eucalyptus gunnii subsp. divaricata miena cider gum end e EN 305 305 100.0 Eucalyptus perriniana spinning gum r 87 37 42.5 Euphrasia scabra yellow eyebright e 60 1 1.7 Glossostigma elatinoides small mudmat r 8 1 12.5 Glycine latrobeana clover glycine v VU 272 36 13.2 Haloragis heterophylla variable raspwort r 328 1 0.3 Hovea longifolia r* 7 5 71.4 Hovea montana mountain purplepea r 95 46 48.4 Hovea tasmanica rockfield purplepea end r 129 42 32.6 Hyalosperma demissum moss sunray e 90 1 1.1 Hypoxis vaginata var. brevistigmata sheathing yellowstar r* 210 2 1.0 Hypoxis vaginata var. vaginata sheathing yellowstar r* 158 7 4.4 Isoetes drummondii subsp. drummondii plain quillwort r 46 6 13.0 Isoetes humilior veiled quillwort end r 13 12 92.3 Juncus amabilis gentle rush r 359 3 0.8 Juncus prismatocarpus branching rush r 13 1 7.7 Threatened plants within the Central Highlands Local Government Area (1 July 2013) 2 of 5 Threatened Species Section Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Tas LGA Species Common name Endemic TSP Act EPBC Act LGA % Count Count Lepidium hyssopifolium soft peppercress e EN 152 12 7.9 Lepidium pseudotasmanicum shade peppercress r 579 11 1.9 Leptorhynchos elongatus lanky buttons e 16 11 68.8 Leucochrysum albicans var. tricolor grassland paperdaisy e EN 268 10 3.7 Leucopogon virgatus var. brevifolius shortleaf beardheath r 79 8 10.1 Lobelia pratioides poison lobelia v 67 3 4.5 Luzula atrata slender woodrush r 9 1 11.1 Lythrum salicaria purple loosestrife v 175 2 1.1 Monotoca submutica var. autumnalis roundleaf broomheath end r 66 19 28.8 Muehlenbeckia axillaris matted lignum r 168 120 71.4 Myosurus australis southern mousetail e 4 3 75.0 Myriophyllum integrifolium tiny watermilfoil v 115 1 0.9 Olearia hookeri crimsontip daisybush end r 34 1 2.9 Orites milliganii toothed orites end r 148 8 5.4 table mountain Ozothamnus selaginoides everlastingbush end x EX 2 2 100.0 Pellaea calidirupium hotrock fern r 49 6 12.2 Pentachondra ericifolia fine frillyheath end r 58 27 46.6 Persoonia muelleri subsp. angustifolia narrowleaf geebung end r 96 3 3.1 Pherosphaera hookeriana Mount Mawson pine end v 136 18 13.2 Phyllangium divergens wiry mitrewort v 102 1 1.0 Pilularia novae-hollandiae austral pillwort r 19 7 36.8 Pimelea curviflora curved rice-flower r* 74 8 10.8 Pimelea curviflora var. gracilis slender curved riceflower r 157 9 5.7 Planocarpa nitida black cheeseberry end r 26 22 84.6 Planocarpa sulcata grooved cheeseberry end r 113 4 3.5 Plantago glacialis small star plantain r 12 4 33.3 Poa mollis soft tussockgrass end r 263 1 0.4 Pomaderris elachophylla small-leaf dogwood v 573 49 8.6 Prasophyllum crebriflorum crowded leek-orchid end e EN 732 452 61.7 Prasophyllum sp. Arthurs Lake mountain leek-orchid end e 9 6 66.7 Prasophyllum tadgellianum tadgells leek-orchid r 9 5 55.6 Threatened plants within the Central Highlands Local Government Area (1 July 2013) 3 of 5 Threatened Species Section Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Tas LGA Species Common name Endemic TSP Act EPBC Act LGA % Count Count Pseudocephalozia paludicola VU 11 2 18.2 Pterostylis pratensis liawenee greenhood end v VU 488 487 99.8 Pterostylis wapstrarum fleshy greenhood end e CR 25 6 24.0 Pultenaea humilis dwarf bushpea v 106 1 0.9 Pultenaea prostrata silky bushpea v 110 1 0.9 Ranunculus collicola lake augusta buttercup end r 12 12 100.0 Ranunculus jugosus twinned buttercup end r 30 29 96.7 Ranunculus pumilio var. pumilio ferny buttercup r 69 33 47.8 Ranunculus sessiliflorus var. sessiliflorus rockplate buttercup r 158 4 2.5 Rhodanthe anthemoides chamomile sunray r 284 18 6.3 Rhytidosporum inconspicuum alpine appleberry e 45 10 22.2 Rumex bidens mud dock r 24 3 12.5 Rytidosperma indutum tall wallabygrass r 354 1 0.3 Rytidosperma popinensis blue wallabygrass end r EN 546 9 1.6 Scleranthus brockiei mountain knawel r 205 146 71.2 Scleranthus fasciculatus spreading knawel v 333 13 3.9 Senecio squarrosus leafy fireweed r 205 1 0.5 Senecio velleioides forest groundsel r 70 2 2.9 Spyridium vexilliferum var. vexilliferum helicopter bush r 270 1 0.4 Stellaria multiflora rayless starwort r 190 65 34.2 Taraxacum aristum mountain dandelion r 64 63 98.4 Trithuria submersa submerged watertuft r 54 2 3.7 Uncinia elegans handsome hooksedge tas r 39 26 66.7 Velleia paradoxa spur velleia v 103 5 4.9 Viola cunninghamii alpine violet tas r 49 17 34.7 Vittadinia burbidgeae smooth new-holland-daisy end r 144 9 6.3 Vittadinia cuneata var. cuneata fuzzy new-holland-daisy r 223 15 6.7 Vittadinia gracilis woolly new-holland-daisy r 358 26 7.3 narrowleaf new-holland- Vittadinia muelleri daisy r 554 7 1.3 narrow leaf new holland Vittadinia muelleri (broad sense) daisy r* 182 1 0.5 Vittadinia sp. r* 3 1 33.3 Threatened plants within the Central Highlands Local Government Area (1 July 2013) 4 of 5 Threatened Species Section Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Tas LGA Species Common name Endemic TSP Act EPBC Act LGA % Count Count Westringia angustifolia narrowleaf westringia end r 193 48 24.9 Xanthoparmelia amphixantha e 56 3 5.4 Xanthoparmelia willisii e 18 4 22.2 Xerochrysum bicolor eastcoast everlasting r 61 2 3.3 Xerochrysum palustre swamp everlasting VU 50 3 6.0 Endemic: end = endemic to Tasmania; tas = within Australia, only occurs in Tasmania; mi & tas = within Australia, only occurs on Macquarie Island and in Tasmania. TSP Act = Tasmanian Threatened Species Protection Act 1995: r = rare, v = vulnerable, e = endangered, x = extinct EPBC Act = Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999: VU = Vulnerable, EN =Endangered, CR = Critically Endangered, EX = Extinct [* = This taxon is protected as (1) it is either a component of a listed taxon, or the name has changed from that which appears in the official legislation, or (2) all taxa (species, subspecies or varieties) derived from this entity are listed as threatened species.] Tas Count = number of records for the species within Tasmania, as per DPIPWE’s Natural Values Atlas (excluding Macquarie Island). LGA Count = number of records for the species within the specified local government area. % in LGA = records within the local government area as a percentage of the total in Tasmania. Disclaimer: The list above is based on records held in the Natural Values Atlas, and may include records that have a large degree of spatial uncertainty or that are known to be locally extinct.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Folklore & History of the Heritage Highway
    Folklore & History of the Heritage Highway Keep an eye out between Tunbridge and Kemton for sixteen silhouettes. Some are quite close to road, some are high on the hilltops. What stories can they tell us about the history of this intriguing region. Page 2 Two hundred years on there’s still plenty of ways to get held up on the Heritage Highway The Silhouette sculpture trail along the Southern half of the Midland Highway is completed, nine years after it was started by locals Folko Kooper and Maureen Craig. The trail between Tunbridge and Kempton, has become an enjoyable feature of the journey along the highway. Installation of four coaching-related sculptures at Kempton earlier this year marked completion of a trail which now has 16 pieces. Page 3 Leaving Oatlands towards the North, on the right side of the Heritage Highway. Troop Of Soldiers—St Peters Pass Van Diemen’s Land was first and foremost a British military outpost. Soldiers accompanied the convicts on the transport ships, supervised the rationing of supplies, and guarded the chain gangs, They also supervised construction of bridges public and private buildings– as well as watching out for the French! Most didn’t stay long. There were other British interests around the world to defend. Many of the convicts they guarded had also been soldiers, but were reduced to committing crime once the wars they were fighting ended and they were out of a job. Chain Gang—North off York Plains Turn-off There was a lot to do to build the colony of Van Diemen’s Land.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to the Southern Midlands
    Welcome to the Southern Midlands SOUTHERN MIDLANDS COUNCIL Page 1 of 30 New Residents Information As Mayor of the Southern Midlands Council and on behalf of my fellow Councillors, I wish to extend a warm welcome and thank you for choosing to live in the Southern Midlands. Kind Regards Alex Green MAYOR SOUTHERN MIDLANDS COUNCIL Page 2 of 30 New Residents Information Contents About our Council ............................................................................................................. 4 Council Offices .................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Municipal Map ................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Councillors............................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Council Meetings ................................................................................................................................................................ 9 Services ............................................................................................................................. 10 Development & Environmental Services ................................................................................................................... 10 Community & Corporate Development
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Rural Tree Decline in a Changing Australian Climate ( Pdf )
    Review of rural tree decline in a changing Australian climate D.C. Close1,2,3* and N.J. Davidson1,3 1Cooperative Research Centre for Sustainable Production Forestry, Private Bag 12, Hobart 7001 2Schools of Agricultural Science and Zoology, Private Bag 54, Hobart 7001 3School of Plant Science, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 55, Hobart 7001 Abstract native animals. Superimposed on these factors are below-average rainfall and above-average Rural tree decline (RTD) in Australia is a temperatures over the past three decades, complex biological issue involving dieback of phenomena that are associated with climate native trees following the removal of native change. Climate change has been linked to vegetation, the introduction of improved eucalypt decline in landscapes with little or no pasture species, soil fertilisation and the rural land use, and to tree decline across Europe. grazing of livestock. The extent and severity The contributions of climate change and rural of RTD has reached historically high levels in land use to RTD are considered in this review and the past two to three decades. As this period recommendations for management are discussed. has coincided with an unprecedented increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration, it may be speculated that climate change, a Introduction result of the Greenhouse Effect, has played a signifi cant role in RTD. Ecological similarities Rural tree decline (RTD) and dieback in between two geographically and climatically Australia have long been observed (Norton distinct Australian case studies (the Midlands 1886) but in the past three decades have of Tasmania and the New England Tablelands of reached historically high levels (Williams New South Wales), both characterised by severe and Nadolny 1981; Rees 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation in Tasmania's Biodiversity Hotspot
    Conservation in Tasmania’s biodiversity hotspot Photo: Matthew Newton “Beaufront” near Ross in the Tasmanian midlands We are pleased to announce seed The land between Tasmania’s Great Issue 20 Autumn 09 funding for a new and very important Western Tiers and the east coast range midlands conservation initiative with represents one of Australia’s handful Protecting the midlands partners Bush Heritage Australia of national biodiversity hotspots, the TLC revolving fund update (BHA) and the Tasmanian Government grassy lowland plains of the Tasmanian Official launch of the Vale of Belvoir Department of Primary Industries and midlands. The region was defined as a TLC bequests Water (DPIW). hotspot due to the large number of species The life of Lindsay Whitham that are endemic (unique) to the area, Drought-ravaged landscapes, dust storms and because it is a refuge for a number and plans for grand irrigation schemes, it of marsupials that are endangered on the all sounds like the Murray–Darling basin, Board Members mainland, such as the spotted-tailed quoll but surprisingly, these images describe (Dasyurus maculatus) and the eastern the current situation in Tasmania’s Mr Peter Bosworth (President) barred bandicoot (Perameles gunnii). midlands. Dr Geoff Couser (Vice President) There is also significant pressure on these Dr Karina Potter (Secretary) Whether it is climate change at work or natural features from a range of land-uses Ms Jane Hutchinson just a blip in the weather patterns, drought that has altered habitat over the years. Ms Sophie Underwood is not the only issue. Land managers in Dr Wendy Potts the region are also concerned about the Although federal funding has been Mr Matt Newton long-term viability of farming systems, invested in a system of protected areas on Mr John Ramsay their impact on the environment and the private land in recent years, there are still Mr Roderic O’Connor potential social and cultural effects on large gaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Assessment for the Water Access Program Midlands Water Scheme, Tasmania
    Strategic Assessment for the Water Access Program Midlands Water Scheme, Tasmania Program Report Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 February 2011 Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Copyright State of Tasmania 2011 Material contained in the report provided is subject to Australian copyright law. Other than in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968 of the Commonwealth Parliament, no part of this report may, in any form or by any means, be reproduced, transmitted or used. This report cannot be redistributed for any commercial purpose whatsoever, or distributed to a third party for such purpose, without prior written permission being sought from the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, on behalf of the Crown in Right of the State of Tasmania. Disclaimer Whilst the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment has made every attempt to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information and data provided, it is the responsibility of the data user to make their own decisions about the accuracy, currency, reliability and correctness of information provided. The Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, its employees and agents, and the Crown in the Right of the State of Tasmania do not accept any liability for any damage caused by, or economic loss arising from, reliance on this information. Preferred Citation DPIPWE (2011), Strategic Assessment for the Water Access Program, Midlands Water Scheme, Tasmania – Program Report, Hobart Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Major Projects Branch GPO Box 44, Hobart, Tasmania, 7001 www.dpipwe.tas.gov.au Published May 2011 ISBN: 978-0-7246-6569-3 The Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment (DPIPWE) The Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment provides leadership in the sustainable management and development of Tasmania’s natural resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Renewable Energy Coordination Framework
    RENEWABLES TASMANIA DRAFT RENEWABLE ENERGY COORDINATION FRAMEWORK Department of State Growth Image courtesy Hydro Tasmania Contents Ministerial message 1 1 Introduction 3 2 Background 4 2.1 Consultation 4 2.2 Renewable energy in Tasmania 5 2.3 National Electricity Market transition 9 2.4 Renewable Energy Zones 9 3 Tasmania’s Renewable Energy Vision 13 3.1 Tasmanian Renewable Energy Action Plan 13 3.2 Tasmanian Renewable Energy Target 14 3.3 Tasmanian Renewable Hydrogen Action Plan 14 4 What the Framework delivers 15 Objective 1 Achieve our Tasmanian Renewable Energy Target 17 Objective 2 Establish Tasmania’s Renewable Energy Zones 21 Objective 3 Partner with our communities 23 5 Have your say 27 6 Next steps 27 Strategic Implementation Plan 28 Glossary of terms 30 Notes 31 WWW.RENEWABLESTASMANIA.TAS.GOV.AU Meeting our TRET will require harnessing Tasmania’s immense renewable energy potential. Image courtesy Hydro Tasmania Ministerial message Tasmania is now 100 per cent Given the pace and extent of the NEM’s self-sufficient in renewable energy, transformation, there will be hurdles along confirming our status as a world the way. This is where the Tasmanian leader in renewable energy generation. Government can make a real difference – and is determined to do so. We have reached 100 per cent thanks to our nation-leading energy policies The challenge now facing us is to ensure and by making Tasmania attractive the continued growth of renewable energy can, will and should be one of the defining for industry investment, which in features of our economy over coming years.
    [Show full text]
  • Late-Quaternary Vegetation History of Tasmania from Pollen Records
    14 Late-Quaternary vegetation history of Tasmania from pollen records Eric A. Colhoun School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW [email protected] Peter W. Shimeld University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania Introduction Vegetation forms the major living characteristic of a landscape that solicits inquiry into the history of its changes during the late Quaternary and the major factors that have influenced the changes. Early studies considered ecological factors would cause vegetation to develop until a stable climatic climax formation was attained (Clements 1936). The concept of an area developing a potential natural vegetation in the absence of humans was similar (Tüxen 1956). Both ideas held that the vegetation of an area would develop to a stable condition that would change little. However, the vegetation of a region never remains in stasis, but develops dynamically through time, influenced by changing dominant factors (Chiarucci et al. 2010). The structure of a major vegetation formation is usually dominated by a limited number of taxa of similar physiognomy. Although many taxa are identified at most sites studied for pollen in Tasmania, the major percentages in the records are represented by fewer than 10 pollen taxa. These are widely dispersed taxa, local taxa usually being under-represented in the records (Macphail 1975). The structures of fossil pollen-vegetation formations are interpreted with regard to modern vegetation even though abiotic and biotic conditions rarely remain the same through time, and identical replication is not expected. During the late Quaternary in Tasmania, the most important abiotic changes affecting vegetation were temperature and precipitation, and the most important biotic change was the impact of Aboriginals using their major cultural tool, fire.
    [Show full text]
  • JLUPI Phase One Land Use Strategy Final
    Land Use Strategy Brighton, Central Highlands, Derwent Valley and Southern Midlands CENTRAL HIGHLANDS COUNCIL Prepared by: Trevor Budge, Dion Lester, Marc Bartsch November 2008 consulting engineers | project managers | building surveyors | environmental scientists Table of Contents 1 Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 1 1.1 A Strategy Based on Sustainability Principles ………………………………………….. 1 1.2 Purpose and Process ………………………………………………………………………………… 2 2 Context …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 3 2.1 State…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 3 2.2 Southern Tasmania …………………………………………………………………………………. 3 2.3 The Sub-Region ………………………………………………………………………………………. 5 2.4 Greater Hobart ……………………………………………………………………………………….. 5 2.5 Municipalities …………………………………………………………………………………………… 7 2.5.1 Brighton …………………………………………………………………………………….. 7 2.5.2 Central Highlands ………………………………………………………………………. 8 2.5.3 Derwent Valley ………………………………………………………………………….. 9 2.5.4 Southern Midlands …………………………………………………………………….. 10 2.6 Population Projections ……………………………………………………………………………. 11 2.6.1 Results ……………………………………………………………………………………….. 11 3 Why this Sub-Region? …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 12 4 Setting the Scene ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 14 4.1 Desired Outcomes …………………………………………………………………………………… 14 5 The Development and Implementation of a strong new Sub-Regional Vision 16 …………….. 5.1 The Basis of the Strategy ……………………………………………………………………….. 16 6 Live …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 17 6.1 Policies …………………………………………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Midlands Council Tasmanian Government & The
    A project by Southern Midlands Council In partnership with the Tasmanian Government & the Australian Government December 2015 The Partnership in Action Our Community Our Community Our Community Midlands Aquatic Centre – A Strategic Project for Tasmania by Southern Midlands Council, Decemberthe Tasmanian 2015 Government & the Australian Slide Government 2 May 2011 Page ‹#› In Confidence Investment Checklist Shovel Ready Project Health & Well Being Outcomes Development Application - Approved Southern Midlands Planning Scheme New jobs in rural / regional area - construction phase 120 jobs +/- Key Recommendation in the Southern - operational phase 10 jobs +/- Midlands Recreation Strategy 2006 - apprentices/trainees Strategic Project – Identified need – Detailed research – Independent viability assessment Safety/survival awareness & training Community capacity building projects - More Australians drown in rivers, Pool open all year round instead of just for 3 months creeks and dams than beaches Council’s depth of expertise to deliver on Canberra Times time & within budget Dec 22, 2013 Council’s ability to manage on going funding and maintenance of the assets Midlands Aquatic Centre – A Strategic Project for Tasmania by Southern Midlands Council, Decemberthe Tasmanian 2013 Government & the Australian Slide Government 3 May 2011 Page ‹#› In Confidence Location - Oatlands Local & Regional Significance Oatlands is 100km from Hobart & 100kms from Launceston on the Heritage Highway The immediate catchment comprises three local government areas Midlands
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3: Tasmanian Midlands and Central Plateau
    3 Tasmanian Midlands and Central Plateau 3.1 Tasmania has been isolated from the Australian mainland for at least 10 000 years. It is characterised by geographic and environmental variation, and high ecological and species biodiversity.1 The state is home to the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area, an area recognised by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) in part for its unusually high proportion of endemic species.2 Tasmania also contains one of Australia’s few alpine regions, and one of 15 nationally-recognised biodiversity hotspots.3 3.2 Average temperatures have been rising in Tasmania since the 1950s, but not as rapidly as the Australian or global averages.4 And while no significant change to total annual rainfall is projected in Tasmania under climate change scenarios, extensive changes are expected to regional and seasonal distributions of rainfall. This is likely to have significant implications for Tasmania’s biodiversity. 3.3 The Committee visited several sites around Tasmania on 30 January 2012. Site inspections focussed on climate change impacts on terrestrial biodiversity, while evidence gathered at a public hearing the following day centred on marine ecosystems. This chapter outlines some of the 1 Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment (2010) Vulnerability of Tasmania’s Natural Environment to Climate Change: An Overview, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Hobart. 2 UNESCO, ‘Tasmanian Wilderness’, <http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/181> viewed 11 April 2012. 3 Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, ‘Australia’s 15 National Biodiversity Hotspots’, <http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/hotspots/national-hotspots.html> viewed 11 April 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the History of the Central Plateau
    141 NOTES ON THE HISTORY OF THE CENTRAL PLATEAU by G.H. Stancombe "Glendessary", Western Junction EXPLORATION AND PASTORAL The First Overland Journey The first approach to this region was made by Lieut. Laycock in 1807 when, with several men, he ascended the Lake River to Wood's Lake and proceeded to the Derwent along the Clyde. Thomas Toombs, a ticket-of-leaver informed Calder the surveyor, years after the event, that he had seen the Great Lake in 1815. No doubt, many such men, attracted to the wild, lonely plateau came hunting for the more elusive creatures, thought to be living there. Penetration from the South-East John Beamont the Naval Officer and Robert Jones a settler on the Jordan, made an expedition to the Great Lake in 1817 at the instance of the new govenor, Sorell, anxious to find new areas of pasture land beyond the settled districts. Beamont first set out from Cross Marsh (Melton Mowbray) and going through Black Brush, climbed the hills to the Clyde. Following the Blackburn Rivulet, they came to the Lagoon of Islands where they found cider gums, some of them destroyed by the natives endeavouring to extract the sweet liquid (if kept for a time the juice ferments in a most satisfactory manner). On the fourth day, Beamont forded the Shannon and proceeded seven miles, but on the following day they could not break camp, as snow and hail driving in from the south prevented them. On the sixth day they reached Swan Bay on the Great Lake, crossing the Ouse on the way.
    [Show full text]
  • Brighton, Central Highlands, Derwent Valley and Southern Midlands Councils
    Brighton, Central Highlands, Derwent Valley and Southern Midlands Councils Joint Land Use Planning Initiative – Stage 2 Heritage Management Plan July 2010 John Wadsley Planning and Heritage Consultancy Planning - Heritage - Environment - Consultation - Facilitation Images on cover page (from top): Bothwell Township and surrounding landscape; High Street, Oatlands; Derwent Valley Council Chambers and War Memorial, New Norfolk; Pontville village Joint Land Use Planning Initiative – Stage 2 Heritage Management Plan Prepared for the Brighton, Central Highlands, Derwent Valley, and Southern Midlands Councils as part of a project managed by Pitt & Sherry Pty Ltd together with Parsons Brinckerhoff. Document Version: Status Date Draft 31 October 2009 FINAL 20 July 2010 © John Wadsley Planning and Heritage Consultancy This document is copyright to John Wadsley. It may only be used for the purposes for which it was commissioned by the Client. Unauthorised use of this document in any manner without prior consent is prohibited. John Wadsley Planning and Heritage Consultancy 33 Everton Place, Acton Park, Tasmania 7170 Mobile: 0417 487 289 Office: 03 6248 7294 Email: [email protected] ABN 47 435 784 653 Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................... 1 1 Introduction ................................................................................ 4 1.1 The Joint Land Use Planning Initiative .............................................................................. 4 1.2 Project Scope .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]