Southampton to London Pipeline Project

Volume 6 Environmental Statement (Volume D) Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment Application Document: 6.4

Planning Inspectorate Reference Number: EN070005 APFP Regulation No. 5(2)(a) Revision No. 1.0 May 2019

(This page is intentionally left blank) Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Contents Appendix 9.4 Potential Effects on the Historic Environment ...... 1 1.1 Construction ...... 1 1.2 Operation ...... 434

Page i of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Appendix 9.4 Potential Effects on the Historic Environment 1.1 Construction

1.1.1 Potential effects on the historic environment during construction have been assessed in the absence of the Archaeological Mitigation Strategy (AMS) (Appendix 9.5) and other good practice measures. Good practice measures are set out in the Register of Environmental Actions and Commitments (REAC) (Chapter 16 Environmental Management and Mitigation) and secured through Development Consent Order (DCO) requirements such as the Code of Construction Practice (in Appendix 16.1 Code of Construction Practice).

1.1.2 No residual significant effects have been identified assuming the AMS and other good practice measures.

1.1.3 Table 1.1 outlines potential impacts resulting in a significance of effect of moderate or above, i.e. a significant effect in Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) terms, prior to good practice measures during construction. Table 1.2 outlines potential impacts resulting in a minor or negligible significance of effect, i.e. not a significant effect in EIA terms, prior to good practice measures during construction. Table 1.3 outlines heritage assets upon which no impact is predicted during construction.

1.1.4 No physical impacts on historic buildings are predicted unless otherwise stated.

Table 1.1 Heritage Assets with Potential Impacts Resulting in Significant Effects Prior to Good Practice Measures During Construction Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 83 Remnants Of Low This heritage asset lies Permanent Moderate Moderate Measures presented Negligible Negligible A Medieval Or partially within the Order Adverse within the Later Field Limits at a point where the Archaeological System South pipeline route runs adjacent Mitigation Strategy Of Durley to the existing pipeline. There (AMS) would be taken Street is therefore a high potential to protect or preserve for pre-existing impact to any in situ or by record any archaeological remains significant which may be present. There archaeological is also the potential for partial remains that may be damage or removal of Assets found (G67). 1553 and 1554 which form

Page 1 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation part of the setting of this heritage asset; however this is also likely to have a pre- existing impact from the existing pipeline route at this location. There is therefore the potential for some further partial damage or destruction to this heritage asset and its setting such that it would be clearly modified. 92 Guidepost, Low This guidepost is situated Permanent Major Moderate Where there is known No Negligible Stephens near to the edge of the Order Adverse archaeology that is not Change Castle Down Limits at an intersection that being removed and is within the area of a recorded, appropriate proposed Haul road. There is protection measures the potential for this heritage would be asset to be damaged or implemented. This removed during construction could include signage of the project which could and fencing, and result in a change to most or reduction or avoidance all key archaeological of topsoil stripping materials, such that the where practicable resource is totally altered. (G70). 94 Stephen's Medium This heritage asset is Permanent Major Major Measures presented Negligible Minor Castle Down situated within the boundary Adverse within the AMS would Adverse of a construction compound be taken to protect or and near to the preserve in situ or by drive/receiving pit for an record any significant auger bore trenchless archaeological crossing. While the remains that may be geophysical survey data did found (G67). not identify archaeological remains at the specific

Page 2 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation location of this HER record, this does not negate the possibility that these archaeological remains are present. Based on available information pertaining to the water level for this location, the water table is not expected to be intercepted during auger boring at a depth of 6.0mbgl and thus dewatering is not likely to occur at this location. However, there is the potential for complete or partial removal of archaeological remains associated with this heritage asset indicating a change to most or all key archaeological materials, such that the resource is totally altered. 308 WWII Aircraft Low The exact location and Permanent Major Moderate Measures presented Negligible Negligible Crash Site, potential for in situ remains of Adverse within the AMS would Near the crash are unclear; be taken to protect or Westbrook particularly considering that preserve in situ or by Grange the Order Limits at this record any significant location are parallel to the archaeological existing pipeline indicating a remains that may be high potential for pre-existing found (G67). impact if these archaeological remains had been present. However, the location provided by the HER

Page 3 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation is within 100m of the Order Limits and the potential for a physical impact on these remains cannot therefore be ruled out. If remains are encountered, these would be automatically be designated as a Protected Place under the Protection of Military Remains Act 1986, and a licence would be required from the Secretary of State before any further disturbance of the remains could be undertaken. If remains associated with the plane are encountered and removed under licence during construction, the would have the potential for a change to most or all key archaeological materials, such that the resource is totally altered. 648 Pyestock/Basi Low This heritage asset is Permanent Major Moderate Where there is known No Negligible ngstoke Canal situated near to the edge of Adverse archaeology that is not Change Boundary the Order Limits and within being removed and Marker the vicinity of both a recorded, appropriate Construction Compound and protection measures a drive pit/receiving pit would be compound associated with implemented. This the trenchless crossing of the could include signage Basingstoke Canal. There is and fencing, and the potential for damage or reduction or avoidance destruction of this boundary of topsoil stripping

Page 4 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation marker such that the where practicable resource is totally altered. (G70). 770 World War Low The exact location and Permanent Major Moderate Measures presented Negligible Negligible Two Aircraft potential for in situ remains of Adverse within the AMS would Crash: the crash are unclear. be taken to protect or Deepcut However, the location preserve in situ or by provided by the HER is within record any significant 50m of the Order Limits near archaeological to a Construction Logistics remains that may be Hub and the potential for a found (G67). physical impact on these remains cannot therefore be ruled out. If remains are encountered, these would be automatically be designated as a Protected Place under the Protection of Military Remains Act 1986, and a licence would be required from the Secretary of State before any further disturbance of the remains could be undertaken. If remains associated with the plane are encountered and removed under licence during construction, the would have the potential for a change to most or all key archaeological materials, such that the resource is totally altered. 826 World War Low The exact location and Permanent Major Moderate Measures presented Negligible Negligible Two Aircraft potential for in situ remains of Adverse within the AMS would

Page 5 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation Crash: the crash are unclear; be taken to protect or Chobham particularly considering that preserve in situ or by the Order Limits at this record any significant location are, in part, parallel archaeological to the existing pipeline and remains that may be within a developed area found (G67). indicating a high potential for pre-existing impact if these archaeological remains had been present. However, the location provided by the HER is within 100m of the Order Limits and the potential for a physical impact on these remains cannot therefore be ruled out. If remains are encountered, these would be automatically be designated as a Protected Place under the Protection of Military Remains Act 1986, and a licence would be required from the Secretary of State before any further disturbance of the remains could be undertaken. If remains associated with the plane are encountered and removed under licence during construction, the would have the potential for a change to most or all key archaeological materials, such that the resource is totally altered.

Page 6 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 828 Steep Acre Medium If archaeological remains are Permanent Moderate Moderate Measures presented Negligible Negligible Farm present, there is the potential Adverse within the AMS would for them to extend to within be taken to protect or the Order Limits; however, at preserve in situ or by this locations, the route is record any significant adjacent to the existing archaeological pipeline suggesting a high remains that may be potential for pre-existing found (G67). impact. The main potential Temporary sheet piling impact on this heritage asset or similar for control of would be in relation to the groundwater would be drive pit/receiving pit and put in place at the compound for the HDD or following trenchless auger bored trenchless crossings: TC 014, TC crossing and the potential for 015, TC 020, TC 023, dewatering. If archaeological TC 031, TC 032, TC remains are present, there is 036, TC 037, TC 040 the potential for a change to and TC 042, unless a key archaeological materials detailed assessment is such that the heritage asset undertaken which is clearly modified. demonstrates that no building or infrastructure is at risk of differential settlement (W13). 829 Steep Acre Medium There is the potential for Permanent Moderate Moderate The REAC also Minor Minor Farm construction to be visible Adverse includes measures for Adverse and/or audible from this noise, access to sites, location. In particular, this reduced working width heritage asset is situated in sensitive areas, the within close proximity to a reinstatement of drive pit/receiving compound vegetation, and control for a trenchless crossing. of ground water levels. There is the potential for These measures will

Page 7 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation dewatering at this location serve to reduce which, as a worst case impacts to Historic scenario, could permanently Buildings, impact the foundations of this Archaeological historic building. There is the Remains, and Historic potential for alteration to the Landscapes. setting of this heritage asset Temporary sheet piling through the removal of or similar for control of vegetation during groundwater would be construction. Overall there is put in place at the the potential for a permanent following trenchless impact on the fabric of the crossings: TC 014, TC building and noticeable 015, TC 020, TC 023, change to the setting of this TC 031, TC 032, TC heritage asset. 036, TC 037, TC 040 and TC 042, unless a detailed assessment is undertaken which demonstrates that no building or infrastructure is at risk of differential settlement (W13). 957 Enclosure And Medium Although the full extent of Permanent Moderate Moderate Measures presented Negligible Minor Ring Ditch this heritage asset is unclear, Adverse within the AMS would Adverse Cropmarks, there is a high potential for be taken to protect or Chertsey associated archaeological preserve in situ or by remains to extend to within record any significant the Order Limits. There is archaeological therefore the potential for remains that may be partial damage or destruction found (G67). of archaeological remains such that the heritage asset would be clearly modified. The value of this heritage

Page 8 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage asset. 1029 Sub- Medium The full extent of this Permanent Moderate Moderate Measures presented Negligible Minor Rectangular heritage asset is unclear, but Adverse within the AMS would Adverse Enclosure Or the proximity of the heritage be taken to protect or Drainage Ditch asset location to the Order preserve in situ or by Cropmarks, Limits suggests that this record any significant Chertsey linear feature type would archaeological likely extend to within the remains that may be Order Limits. There is also found (G67). the potential for this heritage asset to extend to within the drive pit/receiving pit of a HDD trenchless crossing. There is therefore the potential for damage or destruction to archaeological remains during construction which would result in changed to many key archaeological materials such that the resource would be clearly modified. 1049 Sub-Circular Medium The full extent of this Permanent Moderate Moderate Measures presented Negligible Minor Enclosure And heritage asset is unclear, but Adverse within the AMS would Adverse Ring Ditch the proximity of the heritage be taken to protect or Cropmarks, asset location to the Order preserve in situ or by Chertsey Limits suggests that this record any significant linear feature type would archaeological

Page 9 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation likely extend to within the remains that may be Order Limits. There is also found (G67). the potential for this heritage asset to extend to within the drive pit/receiving pit of a HDD trenchless crossing. There is therefore the potential for damage or destruction to archaeological remains during construction which would result in changed to many key archaeological materials such that the resource would be clearly modified. 1343 Farnborough Medium The Order Limits roughly Permanent Moderate Moderate The REAC also Minor Minor Hill, follow the boundary of the Adverse includes measures for Adverse Hampshire Farnborough Hill School, with noise, access to sites, County the addition of a temporary reduced working width Council construction compound in a in sensitive areas, the field in the north of this reinstatement of heritage asset and a drive vegetation, and control pit/receiving compound to the of ground water levels. southwest of this heritage These measures will asset for an auger bored serve to reduce trenchless crossing. There is impacts to Historic the potential for construction Buildings, to be visible and/or audible Archaeological from this location, though Remains, and Historic REAC commitments would Landscapes. reduce the level of this impact. The setting of this building also includes historic landscape elements within the grounds of this heritage

Page 10 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation asset, removal of these has the potential for a permanent adverse effect on the setting; however, the Order Limit has been designed to avoid the majority of the trees on the grounds and their roots, including a reduced working width within this area. Overall, there is a potential for changes to the setting of this historic building, such that it is noticeably changed. 1344 Farnborough Medium The Order Limits roughly Permanent Moderate Moderate The REAC also Minor Minor Hill, Rushmoor follow the boundary of the Adverse includes measures for Adverse Borough Farnborough Hill School, with noise, access to sites, Council the addition of a temporary reduced working width construction compound in a in sensitive areas, the field in the north of this reinstatement of heritage asset and a drive vegetation, and control pit/receiving compound to the of ground water levels. southwest of this heritage These measures will asset for an auger bored serve to reduce trenchless crossing. impacts to Historic Construction of the project Buildings, will therefore be fully visible Archaeological and audible within this Remains, and Historic Conservation Area. There is Landscapes. therefore a short term impact on the setting of this heritage asset from construction to be visible and/or audible from this location such that the setting of the heritage asset is significantly modified. This

Page 11 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation Conservation Area includes historic landscape elements within the grounds of this heritage asset, removal of these has the potential for a permanent adverse effect on this heritage asset; however, the Order Limit has been designed to avoid the majority of the trees on the grounds, and the removal of vegetation will be limited and primarily restricted to the area of the existing pipeline. This heritage asset was visited during the Jacobs Heritage Walkover Survey (September 2018) and it was noted that the impact of the existing pipeline, which cuts through the grounds rather than following the boundary edge (which is the proposed pipeline route), is negligible. Overall, there is a potential for changes to the setting of the Conservation Area, such that it is significantly modified. 1502 Linear And Medium The full extent of this Permanent Moderate Moderate Measures presented Negligible Minor Ring Ditch heritage asset is unclear but Adverse within the AMS would Adverse Cropmarks, may represent a complex be taken to protect or Laleham cropmark site which may be preserve in situ or by situated along a Roman record any significant road. There is the potential archaeological

Page 12 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation for pre-existing impact on this remains that may be site in relation to the area's found (G67). designation as an Authorised Landfill Site; however this potential has not been clarified and it must be assumed that archaeological remains may exist in situ unless prior damage or destruction can be more clearly shown. There is therefore the potential for changes to many key archaeological materials, such that the resource would be clearly modified. 1580 NMP Field Medium This is an extensive field Permanent Moderate Moderate Measures presented Negligible Minor System 6 system of which many Adverse within the AMS would Adverse features lie partially within be taken to protect or the Order Limits. These preserve in situ or by heritage assets have the record any significant potential to be partially archaeological damaged or destroyed, there remains that may be is a change to many of the found (G67). archaeological materials such that the resource and the interrelationship between these features would be clearly modified. 1592 NMP Field Medium This heritage asset is an Permanent Moderate Moderate Measures presented Negligible Minor System 10 extensive field system which Adverse within the AMS would Adverse lies partially within the Order be taken to protect or Limits. Although the pipeline preserve in situ or by route at this location is near record any significant

Page 13 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation to the existing pipeline and archaeological there is a potential for pre- remains that may be existing impact on any found (G67). archaeological remains which may have been present, this impact may not extend to within the Order Limits and the project has the potential for partial damage or destruction such that the heritage asset would be clearly modified. 1618 NMP Medium The Order Limits cross Permanent Moderate Moderate Measures presented Negligible Negligible Enclosure 9 through the centre of this Adverse within the AMS would heritage asset; however this be taken to protect or is at a location where the preserve in situ or by Order Limits run parallel to record any significant the existing pipeline archaeological indicating a high potential for remains that may be pre-existing impact. There is found (G67). the potential for further partial damage or destruction such that the heritage asset would be clearly modified. 1631 NMP Field Low This is an extensive field Permanent Major Moderate Measures presented Negligible Negligible System 14 system of which many Adverse within the AMS would features lie partially within be taken to protect or the Order Limits, which often preserve in situ or by intersects the heritage assets record any significant at a central point in the archaeological feature. Although these remains that may be heritage assets have the found (G67). potential to be only partially damaged or destroyed, there

Page 14 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation is a change to most of the archaeological materials such that the resource and the interrelationship between these features would be totally altered. 1639 NMP/Geophys Medium This heritage asset lies Permanent Moderate Moderate Measures presented Negligible Minor ical Survey partially within the Order Adverse within the AMS would Adverse Barrow Limits and has the potential be taken to protect or for partial damage or preserve in situ or by destruction such that the record any significant heritage asset would be archaeological clearly modified. The value of remains that may be this heritage asset is found (G67). primarily derived from its physical remains and its relationship with other barrows within the vicinity; however any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage asset. 1979 Geophysical Medium This heritage asset lies Permanent Moderate Moderate Measures presented Negligible Negligible Survey partially within the Order Adverse within the AMS would Archaeological Limits at a point where the be taken to protect or Feature 2 pipeline route runs adjacent preserve in situ or by to the existing pipeline. There record any significant is therefore a high potential archaeological for pre-existing impact to any remains that may be archaeological remains found (G67). which may be present. There is also the potential for partial

Page 15 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation damage or removal of Assets 1553 and 1554 which form part of the setting of this heritage asset; however this is also likely to have a pre- existing impact from the existing pipeline route at this location. There is therefore the potential for some further partial damage or destruction to this heritage asset and its setting such that it would be clearly modified. 1980 Geophysical Medium This Geophysical Survey Permanent Moderate Moderate Measures presented Negligible Negligible Survey Archaeological Feature Adverse within the AMS would Archaeological extends beyond the Order be taken to protect or Feature 3 Limits and may form part of preserve in situ or by more extensive field systems record any significant represented by Asset 1580. archaeological There is the possible for remains that may be partial damage or removal of found (G67). this heritage asset resulting in a change to archaeological materials such that the heritage asset is clearly modified. 1982 Geophysical Medium This heritage asset extends Permanent Moderate Moderate Measures presented Negligible Negligible Survey to within the Order Limits and Adverse within the AMS would Archaeological may extend to within the be taken to protect or Feature 5 drive pit/receiving compound preserve in situ or by of an auger bore trenchless record any significant crossing. Based on available archaeological information dewatering is not remains that may be likely to occur at this location found (G67).

Page 16 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation (see Appendix 8.2). However, there is the potential for partial removal of archaeological remains and a change to many key archaeological materials, such that the resource is clearly modified. 1983 Geophysical Medium This group of Geophysical Permanent Moderate Moderate Measures presented Negligible Negligible Survey Survey Archaeological Adverse within the AMS would Archaeological Features is likely to form part be taken to protect or Feature 6 of a broader field system preserve in situ or by within this area. There is the record any significant possible for partial or archaeological complete damage or removal remains that may be of this heritage asset found (G67). resulting in a change to archaeological materials such that the heritage asset is clearly modified. 1984 Geophysical Low There is the potential for this Permanent Major Moderate Measures presented Negligible Negligible Survey heritage asset to be Adverse within the AMS would Archaeological damaged or removed during be taken to protect or Feature 7 construction of the project preserve in situ or by which could result in a record any significant change to most or all key archaeological archaeological materials, remains that may be such that the resource is found (G67). totally altered. 1985 Geophysical Low There is the potential for this Permanent Major Moderate Measures presented Negligible Negligible Survey heritage asset to be Adverse within the AMS would Archaeological damaged or removed during be taken to protect or Feature 8 construction of the project preserve in situ or by which could result in a record any significant

Page 17 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation change to most or all key archaeological archaeological materials, remains that may be such that the resource is found (G67). totally altered. 1986 Geophysical Low There is the potential for this Permanent Major Moderate Measures presented Negligible Negligible Survey heritage asset to be Adverse within the AMS would Archaeological damaged or removed during be taken to protect or Feature 9 construction of the project preserve in situ or by which could result in a record any significant change to most or all key archaeological archaeological materials, remains that may be such that the resource is found (G67). totally altered. 1991 Geophysical Low There is the potential for this Permanent Major Moderate Measures presented Negligible Negligible Survey heritage asset to be Adverse within the AMS would Archaeological damaged or removed during be taken to protect or Feature 14 construction of the project preserve in situ or by which could result in a record any significant change to most or all key archaeological archaeological materials, remains that may be such that the resource is found (G67). totally altered. 1992 Geophysical Medium There is the potential for this Permanent Major Moderate Measures presented Negligible Negligible Survey heritage asset to be Adverse within the AMS would Archaeological damaged or removed during be taken to protect or Feature 15 construction of the project preserve in situ or by which could result in a record any significant change to most or all key archaeological archaeological materials, remains that may be such that the resource is found (G67). totally altered. 1993 Geophysical Low There is the potential for this Permanent Major Moderate Measures presented Negligible Negligible Survey heritage asset to be Adverse within the AMS would damaged or removed during be taken to protect or

Page 18 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation Archaeological construction of the project preserve in situ or by Feature 16 which could result in a record any significant change to most or all key archaeological archaeological materials, remains that may be such that the resource is found (G67). totally altered. 1995 Geophysical Low There is the potential for this Permanent Major Moderate Measures presented Negligible Negligible Survey heritage asset to be Adverse within the AMS would Archaeological damaged or removed during be taken to protect or Feature 18 construction of the project preserve in situ or by which could result in a record any significant change to most or all key archaeological archaeological materials, remains that may be such that the resource is found (G67). totally altered. 1998 Geophysical Low There is the potential for this Permanent Major Moderate Measures presented Negligible Negligible Survey heritage asset to be Adverse within the AMS would Archaeological damaged or removed during be taken to protect or Feature 21 construction of the project preserve in situ or by which could result in a record any significant change to most or all key archaeological archaeological materials, remains that may be such that the resource is found (G67). totally altered. 1999 Geophysical Low This Geophysical Survey Permanent Moderate Moderate Measures presented Negligible Negligible Survey Archaeological Feature Adverse within the AMS would Archaeological extends beyond the Order be taken to protect or Feature 22 Limits. There is the potential preserve in situ or by for partial damage or removal record any significant of this heritage asset archaeological resulting in a change to remains that may be archaeological materials found (G67). such that the heritage asset is clearly modified.

Page 19 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 2000 Geophysical Medium There is the potential for this Permanent Major Moderate Measures presented Negligible Negligible Survey heritage asset to be partially Adverse within the AMS would Archaeological damaged or removed during be taken to protect or Feature 23 construction of the project preserve in situ or by which could result in a record any significant change to most or all key archaeological archaeological materials, remains that may be such that the resource is found (G67). totally altered. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage asset. 2001 Geophysical Low This Geophysical Survey Permanent Moderate Moderate Measures presented Negligible Negligible Survey Archaeological Feature Adverse within the AMS would Archaeological extends beyond the Order be taken to protect or Feature 24 Limits. There is the potential preserve in situ or by for partial damage or removal record any significant of this heritage asset archaeological resulting in a change to remains that may be archaeological materials found (G67). such that the heritage asset is clearly modified. 2002 Geophysical Medium This Geophysical Survey Permanent Major Moderate Measures presented Negligible Negligible Survey Archaeological Feature may Adverse within the AMS would Archaeological relate to the nearby be taken to protect or Feature 25 Geophysical Survey preserve in situ or by Archaeological Feature to the record any significant north (Asset 2003) indicating archaeological the potential for group value.

Page 20 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation There is the potential for this remains that may be heritage asset to be found (G67). damaged or removed during construction of the project which could result in a change to most or all key archaeological materials, such that the resource is totally altered. 2003 Geophysical Medium This Geophysical Survey Permanent Moderate Moderate Measures presented Negligible Negligible Survey Archaeological Feature Adverse within the AMS would Archaeological extends beyond the Order be taken to protect or Feature 26 Limits. There is the potential preserve in situ or by for partial damage or removal record any significant of this heritage asset archaeological resulting in a change to remains that may be archaeological materials found (G67). such that the heritage asset is clearly modified. There is also the potential for damage or removal of the Geophysical Survey Archaeological Feature (Asset 2002) which may form the setting of this heritage asset. 2004 Geophysical Low There is the potential for this Permanent Major Moderate Measures presented Negligible Negligible Survey heritage asset to be Adverse within the AMS would Archaeological damaged or removed during be taken to protect or Feature 27 construction of the project preserve in situ or by which could result in a record any significant change to most or all key archaeological archaeological materials, remains that may be found (G67).

Page 21 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation such that the resource is totally altered. 2005 Geophysical Low There is the potential for this Permanent Major Moderate Measures presented Negligible Negligible Survey heritage asset to be Adverse within the AMS would Archaeological damaged or removed during be taken to protect or Feature 28 construction of the project preserve in situ or by which could result in a record any significant change to most or all key archaeological archaeological materials, remains that may be such that the resource is found (G67). totally altered. 2006 Geophysical Low There is the potential for this Permanent Major Moderate Measures presented Negligible Negligible Survey heritage asset to be Adverse within the AMS would Archaeological damaged or removed during be taken to protect or Feature 29 construction of the project preserve in situ or by which could result in a record any significant change to most or all key archaeological archaeological materials, remains that may be such that the resource is found (G67). totally altered. HLT98 Chobham Medium Chobham Common is an Permanent Moderate Moderate The REAC also Minor Minor Common important area of ancient Adverse includes measures for Adverse heathland and all vegetation noise, access to sites, within its grounds would reduced working width comprise components which in sensitive areas, the contribute to the historic reinstatement of landscape character. The vegetation, and control existing pipeline route which of ground water levels. extends across the common These measures will runs below a footpath, serve to reduce however, if the project impacts to Historic extends beyond the footpath Buildings, there is the potential for Archaeological partial damage or destruction

Page 22 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation to historic landscape Remains, and Historic elements, namely the Landscapes. heathland vegetation. There Measures presented are also two construction within the AMS would compounds within the be taken to protect or common which also have the preserve in situ or by potential for physical damage record any significant or destruction of historic archaeological landscape elements. There is remains that may be also approximately 775m of found (G67). the route which is crossed by three sections of horizontal directional drilled trenchless crossing which will reduce the impact overall. It is recognised that heathland management involves the removal and regeneration of vegetation, and therefore the removal of portions of heathland vegetation are not inherently significant to the overall maintenance of this HLT. There is also the potential for noise and visual impact in what is normally a tranquil environment (Jacobs Heritage Walkover Survey, September 2018) and, as the works will likely restrict the common usage of the area, changes to use or access. Overall, there is the potential for moderate changes to the

Page 23 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation historic landscape character of this HLT.

Table 1.2 Heritage Assets with Potential Impacts Resulting in No Significant Effects Prior to Good Practice Measures During Construction Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 12 Uplands Farm: Medium There is the potential for Short Term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Farm Building construction of the project to 30 Yds North be visible and/or audible from West Of this heritage asset. This is Farmhouse unlikely to be significantly above that which may be experienced within the current agricultural setting; however, there is the potential for a slight change to the setting of this historic building such that it is hardly affected. 17 Hollow Way Low It is likely that this heritage Permanent Minor Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible asset has been partially within the AMS would destroyed by the existing be taken to protect or pipeline, however there is the preserve in situ or by potential for this heritage record any significant asset to extend further into archaeological the current Order Limits. remains that may be There is the potential for found (G67). partial removal of archaeological remains resulting in a change to key archaeological materials,

Page 24 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation such that the resource is slightly altered. 36 Post Medieval Negligibl This heritage asset is Permanent Major Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible Quarries Or e crossed by an HDD within the AMS would Extractive Pits, trenchless crossing. The be taken to protect or South Of Hill HDD technique will minimise preserve in situ or by Farm, Durley the potential impact on this record any significant heritage asset; however archaeological there is the potential for remains that may be damage and partial removal found (G67). of this heritage asset where the pipe is inserted. There is also the potential for damage through compression and/or partial removal of this heritage asset where it underlies the drive pit/receiving compound. 38 Hill Farm Low Although the heritage asset Short Term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible is largely shielded from the Order Limits by vegetation and neighbouring properties, there is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be above that which may be experienced within the current agricultural setting and there is therefore the potential for a slight change to the setting of this historic buildings that hardly affects it.

Page 25 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 50 Medieval Medium The exact nature and extent Permanent Minor Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible Farmstead, of this heritage asset is within the AMS would Possible Mill, unclear and known only from be taken to protect or Maddoxford documentary sources. The preserve in situ or by Farm location of the potential mill record any significant will not be physically archaeological impacted during construction; remains that may be however the land associated found (G67). with this farmstead is likely to be crossed by the project. If in situ archaeological remains are present, there is the potential for damage or removal of archaeological remains such that the archaeological remains would be slightly altered. Our understanding of their significance would be primarily derived from their physical remains rather than their setting. 53 Granary 5M Medium There is the potential for Short Term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor South Of construction of the project to Adverse Netherhill be visible and/or audible from House this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be significantly above that which may be experienced within the current agricultural setting; however, there is the potential for a noticeable change to the setting of this historic building.

Page 26 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 54 Netherhill Medium There is the potential for Short Term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor House construction of the project to Adverse be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be significantly above that which may be experienced within the current agricultural setting; however, there is the potential for a noticeable change to the setting of this historic building. 55 Findens Farm, Low Although the heritage asset Short Term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Kytes Lane is partially shielded from the Order Limits by vegetation and neighbouring properties, there is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be above that which may be experienced within the current agricultural setting and there is therefore the potential for a slight change to the setting of this historic building that hardly affects it. 57 Brown Heath, Low Construction will be visible Short Term Moderate Minor Adverse None Proposed Moderater Minor Gregory Lane and audible from this location Adverse as this historic buildings is situated approximately 50m east of a Construction Compound. There is the

Page 27 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation potential for a change to the setting of this historic building such that it is significantly modified; however, this will not affect the value of this heritage asset. 64 Durley Manor Medium This heritage asset has Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Farm above ground remains which are within an area of vegetation and which are visually shielded from the project. There is the potential for a very limited level of construction to be visible and/or audible from this location during construction resulting in very minor changes to the setting of this heritage asset. 66 The Manor Low Although the heritage asset Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Cottage, the is partially shielded from the Drove, Manor Order Limits by vegetation, Road there is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be above that which may be experienced within the current agricultural setting and there is therefore the potential for a slight change to the setting of this historic buildings that hardly affects it.

Page 28 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 67 Curvilinear Medium No physical impact on this Permanent Minor Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible Enclosure heritage asset is predicted. within the AMS would East Of Manor There is also the potential for be taken to protect or Farm the archaeological remains of preserve in situ or by Cottages, Asset 83, which form the record any significant Durley setting of this heritage asset, archaeological to be partially removed; remains that may be however, due to likely pre- found (G67). existing impact from the existing pipeline, the route is not expected to remove a high percentage of Asset 83 and this impact would not affect our understanding of these heritage assets. There is therefore the potential for change to archaeological materials such that the heritage asset is slightly altered and a very minor change to the setting of this heritage asset. 68 Wintershill Low Although the heritage asset Short term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Farm is partially shielded from the Adverse Order Limits by vegetation, it is likely that construction of the project would be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. A temporary construction compound is proposed to be installed in a field southeast of this heritage asset, however it will not increase traffic on the road which runs through this

Page 29 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation heritage asset. Overall there is the potential for a noticeable change to the setting of this historic building. 70 Toll House On Low Although the heritage asset Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible A333 is well shielded from the Order Limits by vegetation and neighbouring properties, there is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. There is the potential for a slight change to the setting of this historic building that hardly affects it. 72 Cross Lane Medium Although the heritage asset Short Term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Cottage is partially shielded from the Adverse Order Limits by vegetation, there is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be significantly above that which may be experienced within the current agricultural setting; however, there is the potential for a noticeable change to the setting of this historic building. 89 Prehistoric Medium No physical impact on this Permanent Minor Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible And Roman heritage asset is predicted. within the AMS would

Page 30 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation Enclosures, There is the potential for the be taken to protect or Field Systems archaeological remains of preserve in situ or by And Asset 1592, which are within record any significant Trackways the setting of this heritage archaeological North East Of asset, to be partially remains that may be Betty Mundy's removed; however, the route found (G67). Cottage, Exton is not expected to remove a high percentage of Asset 1592 and the potential for this impact to affect our understanding of these heritage assets is therefore low. Regardless, there is the potential for a slight change to the setting of this heritage asset. 91 Former Quarry Negligibl There is the potential for Permanent Moderate Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible North Of e partial removal of this within the AMS would Netherhill heritage asset indicating a be taken to protect or Farm, Durley change to many key preserve in situ or by archaeological materials, record any significant such that the resource would archaeological be clearly modified. remains that may be found (G67). 103 Enclosure, Medium No physical impact on this Permanent Negligible Negligible Measures presented Negligible Negligible Field West Of heritage asset is predicted. within the AMS would Lower There is the potential for an be taken to protect or Preshaw Farm impact to the setting of this preserve in situ or by heritage asset through partial record any significant damage or removal of the archaeological surrounding field system remains that may be (Asset 1136); however, the found (G67). route is not expected to remove a high percentage of

Page 31 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation Asset 1136 and the potential for this impact to affect our understanding of these heritage assets is therefore low. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage asset. 104 Timber- Medium The Order Limits include the Short term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Framed Barn use of Lower Preshaw Lane Adverse At Lower as an access route which Preshaw Farm runs through Lower Preshaw Farm and between Asset 104 and Assets 105 and 109 which are an associated old farmhouse, granary and barn. There is likely to be an increase in construction traffic along this route. The Order Limits for the pipeline route are partially shielded from this heritage asset by vegetation and the neighbouring properties; however it is possible that construction would be visible and/or audible from this location. Overall, there is a potential impact on the setting of this heritage asset

Page 32 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation such that it is noticeably changed. 105 Old Medium The Order Limits include the Short term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Farmhouse use of Lower Preshaw Lane Adverse as an access route which runs through Lower Preshaw Farm and between Asset 104 and Assets 105 and 109 which are an associated old farmhouse, granary and barn. There is likely to be an increase in construction traffic along this route. The Order Limits for the pipeline route are partially shielded from this heritage asset by vegetation and the neighbouring properties; however it is possible that construction would be visible and/or audible from this location. There is the potential for removal of vegetation that falls within the setting of this heritage asset; however, this is along the line of the existing pipeline and vegetation removal would be minimal. Overall, there is a potential impact on the setting of this heritage asset such that it is noticeably changed.

Page 33 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 109 Granary 5M Medium The Order Limits include the Short term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor North Of Old use of Lower Preshaw Lane Adverse Farmhouse as an access route which runs through Lower Preshaw Farm and between Asset 104 and Assets 105 and 109 which are an associated old farmhouse, granary and barn. There is likely to be an increase in construction traffic along this route. The Order Limits for the pipeline route are partially shielded from this heritage asset by vegetation and the neighbouring properties; however it is possible that construction would be visible and/or audible from this location. There is the potential for removal of vegetation that falls within the setting of this heritage asset; however, this is along the line of the existing pipeline and vegetation removal would be minimal. Overall, there is a potential impact on the setting of this heritage asset such that it is noticeably changed. 112 Enclosure, Medium No physical impact on this Permanent Minor Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible north Of heritage asset is predicted. within the AMS would There is the potential for the be taken to protect or archaeological remains of preserve in situ or by

Page 34 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation Crookhorn Asset 1592, which are within record any significant Copse the setting of this heritage archaeological asset, to be partially remains that may be removed; however, the route found (G67). is not expected to remove a high percentage of Asset 1592 and the potential for this impact to affect our understanding of these heritage assets is therefore low. Regardless, there is the potential for a slight change to the setting of this heritage asset. 116 Lomer Medium Construction will be visible Short term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Farmhouse and audible from this Adverse location; however this is unlikely to be significantly above that which is experienced within the current agricultural setting. There is the potential for a noticeable change to the setting of this historic building. 119 Enclosure, Medium The NMP data suggests that Permanent Minor Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible Field West Of a very small portion of the within the AMS would Rooksgrove archaeological remains be taken to protect or Farm associated with this heritage preserve in situ or by asset would fall within the record any significant Order Limits. They are also archaeological likely to have been previously remains that may be impacted by the existing found (G67). pipeline near to this location

Page 35 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation and may not remain in situ. If archaeological remains associated with this heritage asset still exist in situ, the potential damage or partial destruction of this heritage asset during construction could therefore result in a change to key archaeological materials, such that the heritage asset would be slightly altered. 120 Prehistoric Negligibl This feature has been Permanent Negligible Negligible Measures presented Negligible Negligible Features, e partially removed and no within the AMS would Watching Brief further physical impacts to be taken to protect or At Woodstock any potentially remaining preserve in situ or by Green archaeological remains are record any significant predicted. There is the archaeological potential for a very minor remains that may be change to the setting of this found (G67). heritage asset through partial damage or removal of archaeological remains of Asset 119; however any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage asset. 121 Barrow, Field Medium No physical impact on this Permanent Negligible Negligible Measures presented Negligible Negligible West Of heritage asset is predicted. within the AMS would Rooksgrove There is the potential for a be taken to protect or Farm very minor change to the preserve in situ or by setting of this heritage asset record any significant

Page 36 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation through partial damage or archaeological removal of archaeological remains that may be remains of Asset 119; found (G67). however any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage asset. 126 Black House Medium Although the heritage asset Short Term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Farmhouse is well shielded from the Adverse Order Limits by vegetation, there is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be significantly above that which may be experienced within the current agricultural setting; however, there is the potential for a noticeable change to the setting of this historic building. 127 Joan's Acre Medium Although the heritage asset Short Term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor is well shielded from the Adverse Order Limits by vegetation and the neighbouring property, there is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be significantly

Page 37 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation above that which may be experienced within the current agricultural setting; however, there is the potential for a noticeable change to the setting of this historic building. 139 Barrow South Medium No physical impact on this Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Of Joan's Acre heritage asset is predicted. Road There is the potential for a temporary impact on the setting of this heritage asset through disruption of the intervisibility between nearby barrows and due to potential partial damage or removal of one of the barrows within this area (Asset 1639); but this would be a very minor change to the setting and would not effect its value. 141 Garden Wall Medium Although the heritage asset Short Term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible And Gazebo is very well shielded from the Immediately Order Limits by vegetation, West South there is the potential for West Of construction of the project to Woodcote be visible and/or audible from Manor this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be significantly above that which may be experienced within the current agricultural setting; however, there is the potential for a slight change

Page 38 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation to the setting of this historic building that hardly affects it. 142 The Medium Although the heritage asset Short Term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Gardeners is very well shielded from the Cottage Order Limits by vegetation, there is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be significantly above that which may be experienced within the current agricultural setting; however, there is the potential for a slight change to the setting of this historic building that hardly affects it. 143 Woodcote High Although the heritage asset Short Term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Minor Manor is very well shielded from the Adverse Order Limits by vegetation, there is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be significantly above that which may be experienced within the current agricultural setting; however, there is the potential for a slight change to the setting of this historic building that hardly affects it.

Page 39 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 144 Coach House Medium Although the heritage asset Short Term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible At Woodcote is very well shielded from the Manor Order Limits by vegetation, there is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be significantly above that which may be experienced within the current agricultural setting; however, there is the potential for a slight change to the setting of this historic building that hardly affects it. 145 Barn At Medium Although the heritage asset Short Term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Woodcote is very well shielded from the Manor 20M Order Limits by vegetation, East Of Coach there is the potential for House construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be significantly above that which may be experienced within the current agricultural setting; however, there is the potential for a slight change to the setting of this historic building that hardly affects it. 162 Trackway 1 Low There is the potential for Permanent Minor Minor Adverse Measures presented Minor Minor partial removal of this within the AMS would Adverse heritage asset indicating a be taken to protect or change to key archaeological preserve in situ or by

Page 40 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation materials, such that the record any significant resource would be slightly archaeological altered. remains that may be found (G67). 166 Field System 3 Low The full extent of this feature Permanent Minor Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible is not clear; however, the within the AMS would pipeline route at this point be taken to protect or runs adjacent to the existing preserve in situ or by pipeline indicating that there record any significant is likely to be a high level of archaeological pre-existing damage to and remains that may be potential archaeological found (G67). remains associated with this heritage asset within the Order Limits. If any archaeological remains associated with this heritage asset remain in situ, there is the potential to damage or destroy a small area of these heritage assets indicating that there would be changes to the key archaeological materials such that the heritage asset would be slightly altered. 205 Jayswood Medium Although the heritage asset Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Cottage is partially shielded from the Order Limits by vegetation, there is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be above that

Page 41 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation which may be experienced within the current agricultural setting and there is therefore the potential for a slight change to the setting of this historic buildings that hardly affects it. 211 Headmore Medium Although the heritage asset Short term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Farmhouse is partially shielded from the Adverse Order Limits by vegetation and neighbouring buildings, there is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. There is the potential for a slight change to the setting of this historic buildings such that it is noticeably changed. 238 Farringdon Medium There are no impact Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Cottage pathways for effects on setting due to the inherent shielding between the Order Limits for the pipeline route and the heritage asset. The closest section of the Order Limits to this heritage asset is an offsite access road with the main pipeline construction occurring c. 350m away. There is potential for construction of the project to increase traffic on the A32 adjacent to the

Page 42 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation heritage asset however, due to the vegetation shielding the historic building from the road, this is unlikely to result in more than a slight change to the setting of the heritage asset such that hardly affects it. 239 Farringdon Medium There are no impact Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Hurst pathways for effects on setting due to the inherent shielding between the Order Limits for the pipeline route and the heritage asset. The closest section of the Order Limits to this heritage asset is an offsite access road with the main pipeline construction occurring c. 350m away. There is potential for construction of the project to increase traffic on the A32 adjacent to the heritage asset however, due to the vegetation shielding the historic building from the road, this is unlikely to result in more than a slight change to the setting of the heritage asset such that hardly affects it. 245 Trackway 3 Low The extent of this trackway is Permanent Minor Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible not fully known, but it within the AMS would appears to extend from be taken to protect or

Page 43 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation Berryhill Plantation to Jubilee preserve in situ or by Clump and therefore to within record any significant the Order Limits. This is in an archaeological area defined for use as an off remains that may be site access road and not the found (G67). pipeline route. This has the potential for partial damage or destruction such that the heritage asset would be slightly altered. 313 Truncheaunts Medium Although the heritage asset Short Term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor is very well shielded from the Adverse Order Limits by vegetation, there is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be significantly above that which may be experienced within the current agricultural setting; however, there is the potential for a noticeable change to the setting of this historic building. 314 Dovecote 5M Medium Although the heritage asset Short Term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor East Of is very well shielded from the Adverse Truncheaunts Order Limits by vegetation, there is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be significantly above that which may be

Page 44 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation experienced within the current agricultural setting; however, there is the potential for a noticeable change to the setting of this historic building. 366 Stable And Medium Although the heritage asset Short term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Minor Kitchen is well shielded from the Adverse Garden Wall Order Limits by vegetation 30M North and neighbouring properties, West Of The there is the potential for Manor House construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. There is the potential for a slight change to the setting of this historic building that hardly affects it. 369 Manor House High Although the heritage asset Short term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Minor is well shielded from the Adverse Order Limits by vegetation and neighbouring properties, there is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. There is the potential for a slight change to the setting of this historic building that hardly affects it. 378 Stable And Medium Although the heritage asset Short term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Minor Malthouses, is well shielded from the Adverse 10M East Of Order Limits by vegetation and neighbouring properties,

Page 45 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation The Manor there is the potential for House construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. There is the potential for a slight change to the setting of this historic building that hardly affects it. 390 Turnpike Medium This heritage asset is Short term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Cottages situated within close Adverse proximity to a proposed construction compound. The heritage asset is at least partially shielded by vegetation and neighbouring properties, however there is the potential for an increase in construction to be visible and/or audible from this location, primarily in relation to increased construction traffic. The setting of this heritage asset is already impacted by current visual and noise intrusion from the A31 which is directly adjacent to the heritage asset. There is therefore the potential for a noticeable change to the setting of this heritage assets which would not impact upon its character or value.

Page 46 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 391 Froyle Place High There is the potential for Short term Moderate Minor Adverse The REAC also Minor Minor (Known As construction to be visible includes measures for Adverse Gasston and/or audible from this noise, access to sites, House) location. The route extends reduced working width approximately 250m to the in sensitive areas, the south of Asset 391 through reinstatement of the grounds of Treloars vegetation, and control College (HLT32) which once of ground water levels. comprised Froyle Park and These measures will which forms the setting of serve to reduce this historic building; there is impacts to Historic the potential for minimal Buildings, removal of vegetation which Archaeological will not affect the value of this Remains, and Historic heritage asset. Overall there Landscapes. is the potential for change to the setting of this historic buildings such that it is noticeably changed. 398 Church Of St High This heritage asset is well Short term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Minor Mary Of The shielded by vegetation, but Adverse Assumption there is still the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this location. The route is situated over 275m to the south of heritage asset 398 through the grounds of Treloars College (HLT32) which once comprised Froyle Park and which forms the broader setting of this historic building; there is the potential for minimal removal of vegetation which will not

Page 47 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation affect the value of this heritage asset. Overall there is the potential for a slight change to the setting of this historic building that hardly affects it. 400 Turnpike Medium This heritage asset is Short term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Cottages 2 situated within close Adverse proximity to a proposed construction compound. The heritage asset is at least partially shielded by vegetation and neighbouring properties, however there is the potential for an increase in construction to be visible and/or audible from this location, primarily in relation to increased construction traffic. The setting of this heritage asset is already impacted by current visual and noise intrusion from the A31 which is directly adjacent to the heritage asset. There is therefore the potential for a noticeable change to the setting of this heritage assets which would not impact upon its character or value. 415 Hen & Chicken Medium This heritage asset is Short term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Public House situated within close Adverse proximity to a proposed

Page 48 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation construction compound. The heritage asset is at least partially shielded by vegetation and neighbouring properties, however there is the potential for an increase in construction to be visible and/or audible from this location, primarily in relation to increased construction traffic. The setting of this heritage asset is already impacted by current visual and noise intrusion from the A31 which is directly adjacent to the heritage asset. There is therefore the potential for a noticeable change to the setting of this heritage assets which would not impact upon its character or value. 434 Medieval Medium This heritage asset is on the Permanent Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Stone Stile opposite side of the A31 from the project and is unlikely to experience more than a very minor change in setting through construction to be visible and/or audible from this location. There is the potential to partially damage or remove part of an associated pathway, if this also remains in situ, which would have a very minor

Page 49 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation change to the setting of the stone style. 456 Brocas Medium Although the heritage asset Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Farmhouse. is partially shielded from the (Formerly Order Limits by vegetation, Listed As there is the potential for Brockhurst construction of the project to Farmhouse) be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be above that which may be experienced within the current agricultural setting and there is therefore the potential for a slight change to the setting of this historic buildings that hardly affects it. 457 Stable Block Medium Although the heritage asset Short Term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible 10M North is partially shielded from the West Of Order Limits by vegetation Coldrey Farm and neighbouring properties, there is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be above that which may be experienced within the current agricultural setting and there is therefore the potential for a slight change to the setting of this historic buildings that hardly affects it.

Page 50 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 458 Coldrey High Although the heritage asset Short Term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Minor is partially shielded from the Adverse Order Limits by vegetation and neighbouring properties, there is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be above that which may be experienced within the current agricultural setting and there is therefore the potential for a slight change to the setting of this historic buildings that hardly affects it. 460 Linear Feature Negligibl This heritage asset Permanent Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible 1 e represents the line of the existing pipeline has the potential for minor damage during construction but is not going to be removed. 470 Glade Farm Medium Although the heritage asset Short Term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Cottages is largely shielded from the Order Limits by vegetation and topography, there is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be above that which may be experienced within the current agricultural setting and there is therefore

Page 51 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation the potential for a slight change to the setting of this historic buildings that hardly affects it. 495 Trackway, Low The full extent of this feature Permanent Minor Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible Glade Farm is not clear; however, the within the AMS would pipeline route at this point be taken to protect or runs adjacent to the existing preserve in situ or by pipeline indicating that there record any significant is likely to be a high level of archaeological pre-existing damage to any remains that may be potential archaeological found (G67). remains associated with this heritage asset within the Order Limits. If any archaeological remains associated with this heritage asset remain in situ, there is the potential to damage or destroy a small area of these heritage assets indicating that there would be changes to the key archaeological materials such that the heritage asset would be slightly altered. 496 Pipeline Negligibl This heritage asset Permanent Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Visible As e represents the line of the Cropmark existing pipeline has the potential for minor damage during construction but is not going to be removed. 572 Townsend Medium Although the heritage asset Short term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Cottages is partially shielded from the Adverse

Page 52 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation Order Limits by vegetation, there is the potential for construction to be visible and audible from this location; however this is unlikely to be significantly above that which is experienced within the current agricultural setting. A temporary construction compound is proposed to be installed to the south of this heritage asset which has the potential to increase traffic to Dippenhall Street. There is the potential for a noticeable change to the setting of this heritage asset. 573 Townshend Medium Construction will be visible Short Term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor House and audible from this Adverse location; however this is unlikely to be significantly above that which is experienced within the current agricultural setting. A temporary construction compound is proposed to be installed to the south of this heritage asset which has the potential to increase traffic to Dippenhall Street. There is the potential for a noticeable change to the setting of this heritage asset.

Page 53 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 580 Ewshot Low No physical impacts on this Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible heritage asset, or on known archaeological remains which form the setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. There are limited impact pathways for effects on setting for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset, such that any change would be very minor. 582 Type 24 Low No physical impacts on this Short term Minor Negligible None Proposed Minor Negligible Pillbox 3 heritage asset, or on known archaeological remains which form the setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. The proximity of the heritage asset to the project, and to the drive pit/receiving compound of a trenchless crossing, indicates a potential for construction to be visible/audible from this location. There is the potential for a slight change to the setting of this heritage asset which would not affect its value. 584 Type 24 Low No physical impacts on this Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Pillbox 4 heritage asset, or on known archaeological remains which form the setting of this

Page 54 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation heritage asset, are predicted. There are limited impact pathways for effects on setting for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset, such that any change would be very minor. 585 Type 24 Low No physical impacts on this Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Pillbox 5 heritage asset, or on known archaeological remains which form the setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. There are limited impact pathways for effects on setting for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset, such that any change would be very minor. 586 Type 24 Low No physical impacts on this Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Pillbox 6 heritage asset, or on known archaeological remains which form the setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. There are limited impact pathways for effects on setting for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage

Page 55 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation asset, such that any change would be very minor. 587 Type 24 Low No physical impacts on this Short term Minor Negligible None Proposed Minor Negligible Pillbox 7 heritage asset, or on known archaeological remains which form the setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. The proximity of the heritage asset to the project indicates a potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this location which may result in a slight change to the setting of this heritage asset but will not affect its value. 588 Type 24 Low No physical impacts on this Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Pillbox 9 heritage asset, or on known archaeological remains which form the setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. There are limited impact pathways for effects on setting for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset, such that any change would be very minor. 591 WWII Pillbox, Low No physical impacts on this Short term Minor Negligible None Proposed Minor Negligible South Of heritage asset, or on known Dares Lane, archaeological remains Ewshot 1 which form the setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. The proximity of the heritage

Page 56 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation asset to the project indicates a potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this location which may result in a slight change to the setting of this heritage asset but will not affect its value. 595 Army Low Construction will be visible Short Term Moderate Minor Adverse None Proposed Moderate Minor Headquarters, and audible from this Adverse Seymour location. There is the Farm, Ewshot potential for a change to the Lane, Crondall setting of this historic building such that it is significantly modified; however, this will not affect the value of this heritage asset. 597 WWII Pillbox, Low No physical impacts on this Short term Minor Negligible None Proposed Minor Negligible South Of heritage asset, or on known Dares Lane, archaeological remains Ewshot 2 which form the setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. The proximity of the heritage asset to the project indicates a potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this location which may result in a slight change to the setting of this heritage asset but will not affect its value. 598 Site Of Brick & Low The full extent and Permanent Moderate Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible Timber Yard, archaeological potential of within the AMS would East Of this heritage asset is unclear, be taken to protect or Ewshot Lodge however, if in situ preserve in situ or by archaeological remains were record any significant

Page 57 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation to be present, there is the archaeological potential for partial damage remains that may be or destruction of found (G67). archaeological remains during construction such that the resource is clearly modified. 601 WWII Pillbox, Low No physical impacts on this Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible South East Of heritage asset, or on known Riddings archaeological remains Copse which form the setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. There are limited impact pathways for effects on setting for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset, such that any change would be very minor. 614 Hampton's Medium there is the potential for Short term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Farmhouse construction to be visible Adverse and/or audible from this location. There is the potential for alteration to the setting of this heritage asset through the removal of vegetation during construction. Two temporary construction compounds are proposed to be installed in the fields north of this heritage asset which have the potential to increase

Page 58 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation traffic to the surrounding roads. Overall there is the potential for a noticeable change to the setting of this historic building. 620 Pillbox 1 Low No physical impacts on this Short term Minor Negligible None Proposed Minor Negligible heritage asset, or on known archaeological remains which form the setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. The proximity of the heritage asset to the project indicates a potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this location which may result in a slight change to the setting of this heritage asset but will not affect its value. 621 Pillbox 2 Low No physical impacts on this Short term Minor Negligible None Proposed Minor Negligible heritage asset, or on known archaeological remains which form the setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. The proximity of the heritage asset to the project indicates a potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this location which may result in a slight change to the setting of this heritage asset but will not affect its value. 626 WWII Pillbox, Low No physical impacts on this Short term Minor Negligible None Proposed Minor Negligible north West Of heritage asset, or on known Ewshot 1 archaeological remains

Page 59 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation which form the setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. The proximity of the heritage asset to the project indicates a potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this location which may result in a slight change to the setting of this heritage asset but will not affect its value. 628 WWII Machine Low No physical impacts on this Short term Minor Negligible None Proposed Minor Negligible Gun heritage asset, or on known Emplacement, archaeological remains north West Of which form the setting of this Ewshot heritage asset, are predicted. The proximity of the heritage asset to the project indicates a potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this location which may result in a slight change to the setting of this heritage asset but will not affect its value. 629 WWII Pillbox, Low No physical impacts on this Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Probably A heritage asset, or on known Duplicate archaeological remains Entry 1 which form the setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. There are limited impact pathways for effects on setting for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage

Page 60 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation asset, such that any change would be very minor. 630 WWII Pillbox, Low No physical impacts on this Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Probably A heritage asset, or on known Duplicate archaeological remains Entry 2 which form the setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. There are limited impact pathways for effects on setting for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset, such that any change would be very minor. 631 WWII Machine Low No physical impacts on this Short term Minor Negligible None Proposed Minor Negligible Gun heritage asset, or on known Emplacement archaeological remains North West Of which form the setting of this Ewshot heritage asset, are predicted. The proximity of the heritage asset to the project indicates a potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this location which may result in a slight change to the setting of this heritage asset but will not affect its value. 633 WWII Pillbox, Low No physical impacts on this Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible north West Of heritage asset, or on known Ewshot 2 archaeological remains which form the setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. There are limited impact

Page 61 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation pathways for effects on setting for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset, such that any change would be very minor. 634 WWII Pillbox, Low No physical impacts on this Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible West Of heritage asset, or on known Ewshot archaeological remains which form the setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. This heritage asset is not particularly well shielded but lies approximately 250m away from the project. There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this location which may result in a very minor change to the setting of this heritage asset. 635 Pillbox, Low No physical impacts on this Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Ewshot heritage asset, or on known archaeological remains which form the setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. This heritage asset is not particularly well shielded but lies approximately 250m away from the project. There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this

Page 62 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation location which may result in a very minor change to the setting of this heritage asset. 639 Saddling Medium There is the potential for Short term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Stables To construction to be visible Adverse West Of The and/or audible from this Road At location. There is also the Tweseldown potential for an increase in Racecourse construction traffic along this road associated with a Construction Compound to the west. Overall there is the potential for a noticeable change to the setting of this heritage asset. 640 Saddling Medium There is the potential for Short term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Stables To construction to be visible Adverse East Of The and/or audible from this Road At location. There is also the Tweseldown potential for an increase in Racecourse construction traffic along this road associated with a Construction Compound to the west. Overall there is the potential for a noticeable change to the setting of this heritage asset. 641 Hay Barn At Medium There is the potential for Short term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Tweseldown construction to be visible Adverse Racecourse and/or audible from this location. There is also the potential for an increase in construction traffic along this road associated with a

Page 63 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation Construction Compound to the west. Overall there is the potential for a noticeable change to the setting of this heritage asset. 642 Offices At Medium There is the potential for Short term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Tweseldown construction to be visible Adverse Racecourse and/or audible from this location. There is also the potential for an increase in construction traffic along this road associated with a Construction Compound to the west. Overall there is the potential for a noticeable change to the setting of this heritage asset. 643 Grandstand & Medium There is the potential for Short term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Jockey construction to be visible Adverse Quaters At and/or audible from this Tweseldown location. There is also the Racecourse potential for an increase in construction traffic along this road associated with a Construction Compound to the west. Overall there is the potential for a noticeable change to the setting of this heritage asset. 644 Underpass At Medium There is the potential for Short term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Tweseldown construction to be visible Adverse Racecourse and/or audible from this location. There is also the potential for an increase in

Page 64 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation construction traffic along this road associated with a Construction Compound to the west. Overall there is the potential for a noticeable change to the setting of this heritage asset. 646 Basingstoke Medium The Basingstoke Canal will Short term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Canal not be physically affected Adverse during construction and will be crossed by a HDD trenchless crossing. This area of the Basingstoke Canal is located within the immediate vicinity of a major roundabout junction and any potential noise or visual intrusion is unlikely to be a significant change the current setting. 647 Site Of C19 Low No physical impact on this Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Bridge At heritage asset is predicted. Norris Bridge There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this location on the setting of this heritage asset from the drive pit/receiving compound for the trenchless crossing of the Basingstoke Canal; however, as it is situated within the Norris Bridge roundabout junction, the potential change

Page 65 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation to the setting of this heritage asset would be very minor. 656 Belmore Farm, Low This heritage asset is well Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Cove shielded by vegetation associated with the golf course. However, due to its proximity to the project, if any remains do exist then there is the potential for some very minor changes to their setting from construction to be visible and/or audible from this location. 673 North Lodge, Medium There is the potential for Short term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Including construction to be visible Adverse Attached Wall, and/or audible from this Farnborough location. This heritage asset Hill School is immediately adjacent to an access route associated with a Construction Compound situated to the east of Asset 673. Overall there is the potential for a noticeable change to the setting of this heritage asset; however its value will not be affected. 674 South Lodge Medium The Order Limits of the Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible project are separated from this historic building by the A325; however, there is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this location. This is unlikely to significantly increase the

Page 66 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation noise and visual intrusion caused by the current urban environment. There is the potential for a slight change to the setting of this historic building that hardly affects it. 676 Main Building High This heritage asset is Short term Moderate Minor Adverse The REAC also Minor Minor To situated on high ground with includes measures for Adverse Farnborough a distinct slope down to the noise, access to sites, Hill Convent school grounds where the reduced working width Order Limits are located. in sensitive areas, the There is also a temporary reinstatement of construction compound in a vegetation, and control field to the north of this of ground water levels. heritage asset and a drive These measures will pit/receiving compound to the serve to reduce southwest of this heritage impacts to Historic asset for an auger bored Buildings, trenchless crossing. There is Archaeological the potential for construction Remains, and Historic to be visible and/or audible Landscapes. from this location, though REAC commitments would reduce the level of this impact. The setting of this building also includes historic landscape elements within the grounds of this heritage asset, removal of these has the potential for a permanent adverse effect on the setting; however, the Order Limit has been designed to avoid the majority of the trees on the grounds and their roots,

Page 67 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation including a reduced working width within this area. Overall, there is a potential for changes to the setting of this historic building, such that it is noticeably changed. 699 Oriel Cottage Medium Although the heritage asset Short Term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor is well shielded from the Adverse Order Limits by vegetation and neighbouring properties as well as a high fence, there is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. There is the potential for a noticeable change to the setting of this historic building. 705 Rose Cottage Medium Although the heritage asset Short Term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor is well shielded from the Adverse Order Limits by vegetation and neighbouring properties as well as a high fence, there is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. There is the potential for a noticeable change to the setting of this historic building. 712 Empress Medium Although the heritage asset Short Term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Cottages is well shielded from the Order Limits by vegetation and neighbouring properties

Page 68 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation as well as a high fence, there is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. There is the potential for a slight change to the setting of this historic building that hardly affects it. 715 Emperor Medium Although the heritage asset Short Term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible House, is well shielded from the Empress Order Limits by vegetation Cottage, and neighbouring properties Euginee as well as a high fence, there Cottage is the potential for , Ye Olde construction of the project to Farm be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. There is the potential for a slight change to the setting of this historic building that hardly affects it. 720 Yew Tree Medium Although the heritage asset Short Term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Cottage is well shielded from the Order Limits by vegetation and neighbouring properties as well as a high fence, there is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. There is the potential for a slight change to the setting of this

Page 69 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation historic building that hardly affects it. 772 Heatherside Low The extent of this parkland, Permanent Minor Negligible Measures presented Negligible Negligible House which is no longer extant, is within the AMS would Gardens unclear. There is the be taken to protect or potential for prior impact in preserve in situ or by this area through gravel record any significant extraction marked on the archaeological Ordnance Survey mapping remains that may be from 1937 and from the found (G67). installation of the existing pipeline. If archaeological remains are present, there is the potential for them to extend to within the Order Limits and they may be partially damaged or removed. This heritage asset is no longer physically associated with Heatherside House (Asset 1930) due to the increasing urbanisation of the area and the development which has occurred and no impacts to the setting of this heritage asset is predicted. Overall, if archaeological remains are present, there is the potential for changes to archaeological materials such that the heritage asset is slightly altered.

Page 70 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 785 Lightwater Low There is the potential for Permanent Moderate Minor Adverse None Proposed Moderate Minor Manor construction of the project to Adverse Gardens damage or destroy archaeological remains associated with this heritage asset - in particular the surrounding boundary bank - such that it would be clearly modified. The modern, developed setting indicates that the value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage asset. 786 Military Low The full extent of the military Permanent Minor Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible Earthworks earthworks on Turf Hill is not within the AMS would Turf Hill clear and although most be taken to protect or appear on satellite imagery preserve in situ or by to be south of the Order record any significant Limits, the potential for these archaeological heritage assets to extend to remains that may be within them cannot be ruled found (G67). out. There is therefore the potential for partial damage or destruction of archaeological remains associated with this heritage asset such that the resource is slightly altered. There is also the potential for construction to be visible

Page 71 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation and/or audible from this location on the setting of this heritage asset and for the removal of trees???? 794 The Kiln Field Low This heritage asset is Permanent Minor Negligible Measures presented Negligible Negligible (Blackstrood) evidenced by place name within the AMS would only and has been be taken to protect or landscaped as part of a golf preserve in situ or by course. The route at this record any significant location is primarily situated archaeological adjacent to the existing remains that may be pipeline suggesting a likely found (G67). pre-existing impact on any archaeological remains if present. If archaeological remains were to remain in situ, there is the potential for partial damage or removal of archaeological remains, primarily within in the area of the drive pit/receiving compound of an auger bored trenchless crossing. There is also the potential for dewatering within an approximately 10m radius of the drive pit/receiving pit which may damage any currently waterlogged archaeological remains. This could result in changes to key archaeological materials such that the heritage asset is slightly altered.

Page 72 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 796 Brooklands Medium Although the heritage asset Short term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Farm House is well shielded from the Adverse Order Limits by vegetation, there is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. There is the potential for a noticeable change to the setting of this historic building. 798 Barn 30 Yards Medium Although the heritage asset Short term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor To South Of is well shielded from the Adverse Brooklands Order Limits by vegetation, Farm House there is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. There is the potential for a noticeable change to the setting of this historic building. 807 Cultivation Negligibl Although the full extent of Permanent Moderate Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible Marks, e this heritage asset is unclear, within the AMS would Hokemede there is a potential for be taken to protect or archaeological remains to preserve in situ or by extend to within the Order record any significant Limits. There is also the archaeological potential that this heritage remains that may be asset could extend to the found (G67). drive pit/receiving compound for the nearby HDD trenchless crossing. There is therefore the potential for partial damage or destruction of archaeological remains

Page 73 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation such that the heritage asset would be clearly modified. There is the potential for noise and visual intrusion; however, this would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage asset. 809 Barn 20 Yards Medium Although the heritage asset Short term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Minor Hookstone is well shielded from the Adverse Farm House Order Limits by vegetation, there is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be above that which may be experienced within the current agricultural setting. There is the potential for a slight change to the setting of this historic building that hardly affects it. 811 Hookstone Medium Although the heritage asset Short term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Minor Farm House is well shielded from the Adverse Order Limits by vegetation, there is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be above that which may be experienced within the current agricultural setting. There is the potential for a slight change to the

Page 74 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation setting of this historic building that hardly affects it. 830 The Old Medium Although the heritage asset Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Cottage In The is partially shielded from the Grounds Of Order Limits by vegetation, Frogshole there is the potential for Cottage construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be above that which may be experienced within the current agricultural setting and there is therefore the potential for a slight change to the setting of this historic buildings that hardly affects it. 832 Barn 30 Yards Medium Although the heritage asset Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible North West Of is well shielded from the Biddles Farm Order Limits by vegetation, House there is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be above that which may be experienced within the current agricultural setting and there is therefore the potential for a slight change to the setting of this historic buildings that hardly affects it. 833 Barn 10 Yards Medium Although the heritage asset Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible North Of is well shielded from the

Page 75 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation Biddles Farm Order Limits by vegetation, House there is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be above that which may be experienced within the current agricultural setting and there is therefore the potential for a slight change to the setting of this historic buildings that hardly affects it. 836 Biddles Farm Medium Although the heritage asset Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible House is well shielded from the Order Limits by vegetation, there is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be above that which may be experienced within the current agricultural setting and there is therefore the potential for a slight change to the setting of this historic buildings that hardly affects it. 843 Home Farm Medium Although this heritage asset Short term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor is partially shielded from the Adverse Order Limits by the neighbouring building, there is the potential for construction to be visible

Page 76 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation and/or audible from this location. This is unlikely to be above that which may be experienced within the current agricultural setting. There is the potential for alteration to the setting of this heritage asset through the removal of vegetation during construction. Overall there is the potential for a noticeable change to the setting of this historic building. 858 Bee Garden' High No physical impacts on this Short term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Earthwork On heritage asset, or on the Adverse Albury Bottom archaeological remains of Asset 867 which form the setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. The interrelationship between Asset 867 and Asset 858 will not be affected. This heritage asset is situated on high ground over 250m to the north of the project. Jacobs Cultural Heritage Walkover Survey (03/09/2018) confirmed that, despite the distance and the scattered shielding provided by the vegetation overall, its location on higher ground and within an otherwise tranquil location indicates the potential for some

Page 77 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation construction to be visible and/or audible from this location, resulting in the potential for a slight change to the setting of this heritage asset. 866 Possible Low The full extent of this Permanent Moderate Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible Holloways: heritage asset is unclear, within the AMS would Jubilee Clump however due to the proximity be taken to protect or of the HER grid reference to preserve in situ or by the Order Limits it is likely record any significant that some of these trackways archaeological or hollow ways extend to remains that may be within the pipeline route. found (G67). There is therefore the potential for partial damage or destruction of this heritage asset such that the resource is clearly modified. There is also the potential for impacts to the setting of this heritage asset through the partial removal of associated trackways or holloways which may impact our understanding of this heritage asset and construction to be visible and/or audible from this location during construction, such that there may be considerable changes to the setting that could affect the character of the heritage asset.

Page 78 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 867 Earthworks: Medium No physical impacts on this Short term Minor Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible Albury Bottom heritage asset, or on the within the AMS would archaeological remains of be taken to protect or Asset 858 which form the preserve in situ or by setting of this heritage asset, record any significant are predicted. The archaeological interrelationship between remains that may be Asset 867 and Asset 858 will found (G67). not be affected. This heritage asset is situated on high ground over 250m to the north of the project. Jacobs Cultural Heritage Walkover Survey (03/09/2018) confirmed that, despite the distance and the scattered shielding provided by the vegetation overall, its location on higher ground and within an otherwise tranquil location indicates the potential for some construction to be visible and/or audible from this location, resulting in the potential for a slight change to the setting of this heritage asset. 885 Bowl Barrow High Although this heritage asset Short term Minor Minor Adverse Where there is known Minor Minor 150M North- is situated only c.20m from archaeology that is not Adverse West Of the Order Limits, no physical being removed and Pipers Green impact on this heritage asset recorded, appropriate Stud is predicted. No physical protection measures impact to other bowl barrows would be within the vicinity are implemented. This

Page 79 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation predicted and there is could include signage currently no intervisibility and fencing, and between these heritage reduction or avoidance assets. There is the potential of topsoil stripping for construction to be visible where practicable and/or audible from this (G70). location on this otherwise tranquil setting, resulting in a change to the setting of this heritage asset, but the character and value of this heritage asset will not be affected. There is also the potential for the removal of vegetation within the heritage asset's immediate environment, however the current treed environment is unrelated to the original setting of this Prehistoric feature and has no bearing on our understanding of the archaeological remains. Tree removal has the potential to slightly increase intervisibility between this round barrow and others situated nearby thereby enhancing the setting of this heritage asset. Overall there is the potential for a slight change to the setting of this heritage asset. 886 Bowl Barrow 2 Medium No physical impacts on this Short Term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible heritage asset, or on other bowl barrows within the

Page 80 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation vicinity which forms the broader setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. There is currently no intervisibility between these heritage assets. This heritage asset is well shielded by treed vegetation; however, there is the potential for construction to be visible/audible from this location resulting in a slight change to the setting of the heritage asset. It would not affect the way this heritage asset is understood or appreciated. 891 Bowl Barrow High No physical impacts on this Short term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Minor 80M North- heritage asset, or on other Adverse West Of bowl barrows within the Flutters Hill vicinity which forms the broader setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. There is currently no intervisibility between these heritage assets. This heritage asset is over 250m north of the Order Limits and most of the intervisibility is shielded by the surrounding vegetation; however, there is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this location which is unlikely to result in more than

Page 81 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation a very minor change to the setting of this heritage asset. 893 Possible Bowl Medium No physical impacts on this Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Barrow heritage asset, or on other bowl barrows within the vicinity which forms the broader setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. There is currently no intervisibility between these heritage assets. This heritage asset is well shielded by the small copse of trees within which it is situated; however, there is the potential for construction to be visible/audible from this location resulting in a slight change to the setting of the heritage asset. It would not affect the way this heritage asset is understood or appreciated. 916 Anchor House Medium Although the heritage asset Short Term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor is well shielded from the Adverse Order Limits by vegetation and neighbouring properties, there is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. There is the potential for a noticeable change to the setting of this historic building.

Page 82 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 917 Silverlands, Low There has been substantial Long term Minor Negligible Measures presented Negligible Negligible Holloway Hill, modifications to the original within the AMS would Chertsey estate and it is unclear if be taken to protect or archaeological remains preserve in situ or by associated with the original record any significant historic landscape remain. If archaeological present, there is the potential remains that may be for damage or removal of found (G67). archaeological remains; however, the Order Limits follow the existing pipeline route at this locations, indicating the potential for pre-existing impact. There is the potential for physical removal of historic landscape elements, mainly vegetation, which may have an impact on the setting of this heritage asset; however, satellite imagery indicates that the treed border is a late 20th century addition to the property and not a feature of the historic parkland. There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this location. Overall, there is the potential for changes to archaeological materials such that the heritage asset is slightly altered and slight changes to the setting of this heritage asset.

Page 83 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 918 Ivy Cottage Medium Although the heritage asset Short Term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible is well shielded from the Order Limits by vegetation and neighbouring properties and is separated from the Order Limits by Stonehill Road, there is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. There is the potential for a slight change to the setting of this historic buildings that hardly affects it. 919 Silverlands Medium Although the heritage asset Short Term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible is well shielded from the Order Limits by vegetation and neighbouring properties, there is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be above that which may be experienced within the current setting as a commercial stone supplier and there is the potential for a slight change to the setting of this historic buildings that hardly affects it. 928 Barn Of Medium There is the potential for Short term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Minor Hardwick construction to be visible Adverse Court Farm To and/or audible from this location. There is the

Page 84 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation The West Of potential for alteration to the The House setting of this heritage asset through the removal of vegetation during construction. The setting of this heritage asset is already impacted by current visual and noise intrusion from the fringe-urban environment in which it is situated and its proximity to the M25. The construction of the project is unlikely to have a significantly larger impact on the setting than these modern developments. 929 Hardwick Medium Although the heritage asset Short term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Minor Court is partially shielded from the Adverse Farmhouse Order Limits by vegetation, there is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this location, in particular in relation to a Site Compound and the drive pit/receiving compounds for a trenchless crossing. There is therefore the potential for a slight change to the setting of this historic buildings that hardly affects it. 943 Pannells Farm Low There is the potential for Short term Moderate Minor Adverse None Proposed Moderate Minor noise and visual intrusion on Adverse the setting of this heritage

Page 85 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation asset associated with a Site Compound situated just to the north of the farm and access routes situated through the farm itself. There is the potential for pipeline installation to be visible and/or audible from this location; though this is unlikely to be substantially different from that experienced within the current agricultural setting, particularly in consideration of the close proximity of the M25 motorway. There is the potential for removal of vegetation associated with this farm; though this will not affect the value of this heritage asset. Overall there is the potential for a change to the setting of this heritage asset such that it is significantly modified. 958 Cropmarks/Soi Low Although the full extent of Permanent Moderate Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible lmarks: this heritage asset is unclear, within the AMS would Chertsey 2 there is a high potential for be taken to protect or associated archaeological preserve in situ or by remains to extend to within record any significant the Order Limits. There is archaeological therefore the potential for remains that may be partial damage or destruction found (G67). of archaeological remains such that the heritage asset

Page 86 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation would be clearly modified. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage asset. 1004 Three Horse Medium Although well shielded by Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Shoes Public vegetation, there is potential House for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be significantly more than that experienced within the agricultural and industrial setting (the land crossed by the project at this location has been utilised for quarrying). There is the potential for increased construction to be visible and/or audible from this location along Shepperton Road due to construction related traffic. This has the potential for slight changes to the setting of this historic building that hardly affects it. 1023 Manor Medium There is potential for Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Farmhouse construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. This is

Page 87 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation unlikely to be significantly more than that experienced within the agricultural and industrial setting (the land crossed by the project at this location has been utilised for quarrying), resulting in very minor changes to the setting of this heritage asset. 1024 Cambridge Medium There is potential for Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible And The Red construction of the project to Cottage be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be significantly more than that experienced within the agricultural and industrial setting (the land crossed by the project at this location has been utilised for quarrying), resulting in very minor changes to the setting of this heritage asset. 1026 Outbuilding Medium There is potential for Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Adjacent To construction of the project to Manor be visible and/or audible from Farmhouse this heritage asset. This is And Barn unlikely to be significantly more than that experienced within the agricultural and industrial setting (the land crossed by the project at this location has been utilised for quarrying), resulting in very

Page 88 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation minor changes to the setting of this heritage asset. 1028 Outbuilding To Medium There is potential for Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible North East Of construction of the project to Barn At Manor be visible and/or audible from Farm this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be significantly more than that experienced within the agricultural and industrial setting (the land crossed by the project at this location has been utilised for quarrying), resulting in very minor changes to the setting of this heritage asset. 1037 Granary To Medium There is potential for Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible South East Of construction of the project to Barn At Manor be visible and/or audible from Farm this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be significantly more than that experienced within the agricultural and industrial setting (the land crossed by the project at this location has been utilised for quarrying), resulting in very minor changes to the setting of this heritage asset. 1064 Intake, Low Although the heritage asset Short term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Minor Littleton is well shielded from the Adverse Pumping Order Limits by vegetation, Station & there is the potential for Queen Mary construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from

Page 89 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation Reservoir, this heritage asset. There is Laleham the potential for a slight change to the setting of this historic building that hardly affects it. 1076 Church Of St Medium There is the potential for Short term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Hilda construction to be visible Adverse and/or audible from this location. The pipeline route is on line with Woodthorpe Road at this location and the potential increase in noise and visual intrusion is unlikely to be significantly above that which is currently found within the urban setting. There is also the potential for an increase in construction traffic along this road associated with a Construction Compound to the west. Overall there is the potential for a noticeable change to the setting of this heritage asset. 1078 Railings And Medium Although the heritage asset Short term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Minor Gates Lodge is well shielded from the Adverse To Welsh Order Limits by vegetation, School there is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. There is the potential for a slight change to the setting of this

Page 90 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation historic building that hardly affects it. 1080 Welsh School Medium Construction will be visible Short term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor and audible from this Adverse location. There is the potential for alteration to the setting of this heritage asset through the removal of vegetation during construction. Overall there is the potential for a noticeable change to the setting of this heritage asset which will not affect its value. 1081 Ashford Low The setting of this heritage Short term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Station asset is already impacted by Adverse current visual and noise intrusion from the urban environment in which it is situated; however, the close proximity of this building to the Order Limits and to the drive pit/receiving compounds for an auger bored trenchless crossing indicates the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this location during construction such that there is a noticeable change to the setting of this heritage asset. 1082 Chapel At Medium Construction will be visible Short term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Welsh School and audible from this Adverse

Page 91 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation location. There is the potential for alteration to the setting of this heritage asset through the removal of vegetation during construction. Overall there is the potential for a noticeable change to the setting of this heritage asset which will not affect its value. 1087 Ashford Fire Low Although the heritage asset Short Term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Station is within an urban environment and well shielded from the Order Limits by neighbouring properties, there is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. There is the potential for a slight change to the setting of this historic buildings that hardly affects it. 1106 Romano- High No physical impact on this Short term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Minor British Site heritage asset is predicted. Adverse 1000Yds There are limited to no (910M) W Of impact pathways for effects East Bedfont on setting for effects on Parish Church setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. If construction to be visible and/or audible

Page 92 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation from this location were to occur during construction, they would not be a noticeable change from the current industrial setting and would not impact upon our understanding or appreciation of this heritage asset. 1107 Part Of A High No physical impact on this Short term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Minor Causewayed heritage asset is predicted. Adverse Enclosure, There are limited to no 632M North- impact pathways for effects East Of on setting for effects on Mayfield Farm setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. If construction to be visible and/or audible from this location were to occur during construction, they would not be a noticeable change from the current industrial setting and would not impact upon our understanding or appreciation of this heritage asset. 1108 Bramdean High No physical impacts on this Short term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Minor Roman Villa heritage asset, or on known Adverse archaeological remains which form the setting of this heritage asset (Asset 1690), are predicted. This heritage

Page 93 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation asset is situated on a promontory over 200m north of the project, however, Jacobs Cultural Heritage Walkover Survey (20/09/2018) confirmed the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this location. There is the potential for a very minor change from that experienced within the current agricultural setting of this heritage asset. 1125 Bishops Low This heritage asset does not Permanent Minor Minor Adverse Where there is known No Negligible Waltham Deer lie within the Order Limits, archaeology that is not Change Park Boundary however it is immediately being removed and - Park Lug adjacent to a Construction recorded, appropriate Logistic Hub and therefore protection measures has the potential for partial would be damage to the implemented. This archaeological materials could include signage such that the heritage asset and fencing, and is slightly altered. reduction or avoidance of topsoil stripping where practicable (G70). 1131 Roman Road Low The location of this heritage Permanent Negligible Negligible Measures presented Negligible Negligible From asset is not certain; however within the AMS would Winchester To this section of the pipeline be taken to protect or Wickham route is predominantly preserve in situ or by adjacent to the existing record any significant pipeline. This area is also archaeological within the vicinity of a

Page 94 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation modern road, which may also remains that may be have previously removed any found (G67). archaeological remains associated with this heritage asset at this location. This indicates that there is a very high potential for pre-existing impact on any archaeological remains associated with this heritage asset which may have been situated in this vicinity. It is therefore unlikely that anything more than a small portion of this road would remain, if at all, and that anything more than a very minor change to archaeological materials would occur during construction. 1136 Field W Of Low This heritage asset extends Permanent Minor Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible Lower to within the area of an auger within the AMS would Preshaw Farm bore trenchless crossing be taken to protect or drive pit/receiving compound preserve in situ or by and to within the boundaries record any significant of the Order Limits. Based on archaeological available information remains that may be pertaining to the water level found (G67). for this location, the water table is not expected to be intercepted during auger boring at a depth of 6.0mbgl and thus dewatering is not likely to occur at this location. However, the potential

Page 95 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation damage or partial destruction of this heritage asset during construction could therefore result in a change to key archaeological materials, such that the heritage asset would be slightly altered. 1140 Lomer Cottage Low Although the heritage asset Short Term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible is partially shielded from the Order Limits by vegetation, there is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be above that which may be experienced within the current agricultural setting and there is therefore the potential for a slight change to the setting of this historic buildings that hardly affects it. 1141 Lomer, High No physical impact on this Short term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Minor Deserted heritage asset is predicted. Adverse Medieval There is the potential for Settlement partial damage or removal of associated archaeological remains of the Early medieval boundary track (Asset 1144) which runs through Asset 1141 and forms part of its setting; however, this is at the location of the existing

Page 96 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation pipeline suggesting the potential for pre-existing impact on this heritage asset and a negligible magnitude of impact. Jacobs Cultural Heritage Walkover Survey (05/09/2018) confirmed the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this location, however, this is unlikely to be significantly more than that experienced within the current agricultural setting, resulting in very minor changes to the setting of this heritage asset. 1143 Trackway Low The pipeline route is in line Permanent Negligible Negligible Measures presented Negligible Negligible From Wyn with the existing pipeline at within the AMS would Cottages To the point at which it crosses be taken to protect or Preshaw this heritage asset. There is preserve in situ or by Down, likely to be a pre-existing record any significant Preshaw impact on any archaeological archaeological remains associated with this remains that may be heritage asset at this location found (G67). and the project is unlikely to damage or destroy this heritage asset much further if at all. Access to the footpath may be temporarily disrupted, but there will be no long-term impact to the continuity of the routeway. 1144 Boundary Low The pipeline route is in line Permanent Negligible Negligible Measures presented Negligible Negligible Track From with the existing pipeline at within the AMS would

Page 97 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation Lomer To the point at which it crosses be taken to protect or Wind Farm, this heritage asset. There is preserve in situ or by Preshaw likely to be a pre-existing record any significant impact on any archaeological archaeological remains associated with this remains that may be heritage asset at this location found (G67). and the project is unlikely to damage or destroy this heritage asset much further if at all. Access to the footpath may be temporarily disrupted, but there will be no long-term impact to the continuity of the routeway. 1149 Barrow At Medium No physical impact on this Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Dark Lane, heritage asset is predicted. Brockwood There is the potential for a Copse temporary impact on the setting of this heritage asset through disruption of the intervisibility between nearby barrows and due to potential partial damage or removal of one of the barrows within this area (Asset 1639); but this would be a very minor change to the setting and would not effect its value. 1150 Rowley Low No physical impact on this Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Beeches heritage asset is predicted. There is the potential for a temporary impact on the setting of this heritage asset through disruption of the

Page 98 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation intervisibility between nearby barrows and due to potential partial damage or removal of one of the barrows within this area (Asset 1639); but this would be a very minor change to the setting and would not effect its value. 1151 Bowl Barrow, Medium No physical impact on this Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Rowley heritage asset is predicted. Beeches There is the potential for a South Corner temporary impact on the setting of this heritage asset through disruption of the intervisibility between nearby barrows and due to potential partial damage or removal of one of the barrows within this area (Asset 1639); but this would be a very minor change to the setting and would not effect its value. 1152 Barrow At Medium No physical impact on this Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Rowley heritage asset is predicted. Beeches There is the potential for a temporary impact on the setting of this heritage asset through disruption of the intervisibility between nearby barrows and due to potential partial damage or removal of one of the barrows within this area (Asset 1639); but this would be a very minor

Page 99 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation change to the setting and would not effect its value. 1153 Barrow At Medium No physical impact on this Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Rowley heritage asset is predicted. Beeches There is the potential for a South Corner temporary impact on the setting of this heritage asset through disruption of the intervisibility between nearby barrows and due to potential partial damage or removal of one of the barrows within this area (Asset 1639); but this would be a very minor change to the setting and would not effect its value. 1156 Round Barrow Medium No physical impact on this Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Opposite heritage asset is predicted. Joans Acre There is the potential for a temporary impact on the setting of this heritage asset through disruption of the intervisibility between nearby barrows and due to potential partial damage or removal of one of the barrows within this area (Asset 1639); but this would be a very minor change to the setting and would not effect its value. 1157 Possible Negligibl No physical impact on this Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Barrow/Spoil e heritage asset is predicted. Heap At There is the potential for a Joan's Acre temporary impact on the

Page 100 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation setting of this heritage asset through disruption of the intervisibility between nearby barrows and due to potential partial damage or removal of one of the barrows within this area (Asset 1639); but this would be a very minor change to the setting and would not effect its value. 1158 Barrow, A272, Low No physical impacts on this Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Bramdean heritage asset, or on other bowl barrows within the vicinity which forms the broader setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. There is the potential for a temporary impact on the setting of this heritage asset through disruption of the intervisibility between nearby barrows; but this would be a very minor change to the setting and would not effect its value. 1159 Bowl Barrow, Medium No physical impacts on this Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible South Of A272 heritage asset, or on other bowl barrows within the vicinity which forms the broader setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. There is the potential for a temporary impact on the setting of this heritage asset

Page 101 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation through disruption of the intervisibility between nearby barrows; but this would be a very minor change to the setting and would not effect its value. 1245 Possible Medium No physical impact on this Short term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Medieval heritage asset is predicted. Adverse Manorial The proximity of the heritage Complex, asset to the project indicates Monk Wood a potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this location which may result in a slight change to the setting of this heritage asset but will not affect its value. 1255 Neatham Low The distance between this Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Manor Park heritage asset and the Order Limits, in conjunction with the dense vegetation situated between this heritage asset and the pipeline route which will provide significant shielding from any potential construction to be visible and/or audible from this location indicates that there would be, at most, a very small change to the historic landscape character of this heritage asset. 1269 Mill Court Deer Low The distance between this Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Park heritage asset and the Order Limits, in conjunction with the

Page 102 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation dense vegetation which is situated between this heritage asset and the pipeline route will provide significant shielding from any potential construction to be visible and/or audible from this location indicates that there would be, at most, a very small change to the historic landscape character of this heritage asset. 1275 Froyle (Upper) Medium No physical impact on this Short term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Minor heritage asset is predicted. Adverse Although the heritage asset is well shielded from the Order Limits by vegetation and neighbouring properties, there is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. There is the potential for a slight change to the setting of this historic building that hardly affects it. 1285 Froyle (Lower) Medium No physical impact on this Short term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor heritage asset is predicted. Adverse Although generally well shielded by vegetation, construction of the project will be visible and audible at the southern end of this heritage asset. A temporary

Page 103 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation construction compound is proposed to be installed in a field southeast from this heritage asset which may increase construction traffic through this Conservation Area. There is the potential for a noticeable change to the setting of this heritage asset. 1288 Roman Road Low The projected route of this Permanent Minor Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible London To heritage asset is based on within the AMS would Winchester the excavation of a portion of be taken to protect or (Possible) this road within Neatham and preserve in situ or by the projection may therefore record any significant be relatively accurate. It archaeological crosses the Order Limits at remains that may be two points, the first one found (G67). laying outside of the limit of deviation, near to the receiving compound of a HDD trenchless crossing, and the second within an area of the Order Limit which runs parallel to the existing pipeline, which indicated a high potential for pre-existing impact to any potential archaeological remains which may have been present. There is therefore the potential for damage or destruction to a small portion of archaeological remains associated with this heritage

Page 104 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation asset which still remain in situ, if any, resulting in changes to key archaeological materials such that the heritage asset would be slightly altered. 1298 Crondall Medium No physical impact on this Short Term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor heritage asset is predicted. Adverse Although generally well shielded by vegetation, construction of the project will be visible and audible at the southern end of this heritage asset. A temporary construction compound is proposed to be installed in a field southeast from this heritage asset which may increase construction traffic through this Conservation Area. There is the potential for a noticeable change to the setting of this heritage asset. 1325 Basingstoke Medium The majority of this heritage Permanent Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Canal asset is crossed by a HDD Adverse trenchless crossing, with the receiving compound situated just within the Conservation Area. There will be no physical impact to historic buildings within the Conservation Area. There is the potential for vegetation

Page 105 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation clearance to enable the trenchless crossing of the Basingstoke Canal; however the surrounding vegetation at this location is not considered to contribute highly to the value of this heritage asset. The setting of this heritage asset is already impacted by current visual and noise intrusion from Norris Hill Road, Fleet Road and Ively Road junction which runs adjacent to and over the heritage asset; the construction of the project is unlikely to significantly add to the visual and noise intrusion on the setting of the heritage asset. 1329 Site Of Low If archaeological remains are Permanent Minor Negligible Measures presented Negligible Negligible Brickworks, S present, there is the potential within the AMS would Of Eelmoor for them to extend to within be taken to protect or Farm the Order Limits and for a preserve in situ or by change to key archaeological record any significant materials such that the archaeological heritage asset is slightly remains that may be altered. The value of this found (G67). heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and

Page 106 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation appreciation of this heritage asset. 1348 Former Low This heritage asset is Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Officers' Mess, situated approximately 200m Princess Royal southeast of a Construction Barracks, Logistics Hub. This heritage Deepcut asset is well shielded by vegetation and neighbouring properties. There may be some increased noise and visual intrusion from construction traffic; however, this is likely to be a change to the setting of this historic building that hardly affects it. 1349 Alma House, Low This heritage asset is Short Term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Princess Royal situated approximately 90m Barracks, southeast of a Construction Deepcut Logistics Hub. This heritage asset is well shielded by vegetation. There may be some increased noise and visual intrusion from construction traffic; however, this is likely to be a change to the setting of this historic building that hardly affects it. 1411 Possible Low No physical impacts on this Short term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Linear heritage asset, or on the Adverse Earthworks: archaeological remains of Albury Bottom Asset 858 which form the setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. The interrelationship between

Page 107 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation Asset 1411 and Asset 858 will not be affected. This heritage asset is situated on high ground over 250m to the north of the project. Jacobs Cultural Heritage Walkover Survey (03/09/2018) confirmed that, despite the distance and the scattered shielding provided by the vegetation overall, its location on higher ground and within an otherwise tranquil location indicates the potential for some construction to be visible and/or audible from this location, resulting in the potential for a slight change to the setting of this heritage asset. 1501 Shepperton Negligibl There is the potential for Permanent Minor Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Gravel Pits, e damage or removal of Change Shepperton archaeological remains which extend to within the Order Limits of the project. Furthermore a construction logistics hub and the drive pit/receiving pit and compound for a HDD trenchless crossing are within the boundaries of this heritage asset. The historic gravel pit has broadly been repurposed and any physical

Page 108 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact will not impact upon the historic nature or value of this heritage asset. There is the potential for changes to the archaeological materials such that the resource is slightly altered. 1506 Laleham Medium No physical impact on this Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible heritage asset is predicted. There is potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be significantly more than that experienced within the agricultural and industrial setting (the land crossed by the project at this location has been utilised for quarrying), resulting in a slight change to the setting of this heritage asset that would hardly affect it. 1533 Roman Road, Low This proposed route for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible Winchester To Roman road from Winchester within the AMS would London to London is just south of be taken to protect or another predicted route preserve in situ or by (Asset 1288) which was record any significant evidenced during archaeological excavations in Neatham and remains that may be is therefore more likely to be found (G67). accurate; however this location is currently developed and any

Page 109 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation archaeological remains which may have been present are likely to have been subject to pre-existing impact. This predicted road crosses the Order Limits in an area of HDD trenchless crossing and extends across a construction compound. There is the potential for partial damage or removal of archaeological remains if present, however, the trenchless crossing technique minimises the potential for this impact. If archaeological remains related to this heritage asset are present, then there is the potential for damage or destruction of a small portion of this heritage asset overall, such that the heritage asset would be slightly altered. 1534 Roman Road, Low This proposed route for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible Silchester To Roman road from Silchester within the AMS would Chichester to Chichester crosses Order be taken to protect or Limits at a point where it is preserve in situ or by situated adjacent to the record any significant existing pipeline, indicating a archaeological high potential for pre-existing remains that may be impact on any archaeological found (G67). remains which may have been located in this area. However, if the Roman road

Page 110 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation were to follow the proposed route, there would be the potential for a small portion of the heritage asset to be damaged or destroyed during construction such that the heritage asset would be slightly altered. 1535 Roman Road, Low This proposed route for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible Neatham To Roman road from Neatham within the AMS would Alice Holt to Alice Holt crosses the be taken to protect or Order Limits at a point where preserve in situ or by it is situated adjacent to the record any significant existing pipeline, indicating a archaeological high potential for pre-existing remains that may be impact on any archaeological found (G67). remains which may have been located in this area. However, if the Roman road were to follow the proposed route, there would be the potential for a small portion of the heritage asset to be damaged or destroyed during construction such that the heritage asset would be slightly altered. 1536 Roman Road, Low This proposed route for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible Farley Heath Roman road from Farley within the AMS would To Bagshot 2 Heath to Bagshot crosses be taken to protect or the Order Limits twice, once preserve in situ or by at a point where it is situated record any significant adjacent to the existing archaeological pipeline and also where the

Page 111 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation pipeline route follows a remains that may be modern road, both indicating found (G67). a high potential for pre- existing impact on any archaeological remains which may have been located in this area. However, if the Roman road were to follow the proposed route, there would be the potential for a small portion of the heritage asset to be damaged or destroyed during construction such that the heritage asset would be slightly altered. 1537 Roman Road, Low This proposed route for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible Farley Heath Roman road from Farley within the AMS would To Bagshot 1 Heath to Bagshot crosses be taken to protect or the Order Limits twice, once preserve in situ or by in the location of a record any significant Construction Logistics Hub archaeological separate from the pipeline remains that may be route and also at a point found (G67). where the pipeline route is situated adjacent to the existing pipeline, indicating a high potential for pre-existing impact on any archaeological remains which may have been located in this area. However, if the Roman road were to follow this proposed route, there would be the potential for a small portion

Page 112 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation of the heritage asset to be damaged through compression by the Logistics Hub structure or damaged or destroyed during construction such that the heritage asset would be slightly altered. 1538 Roman Road, Low This proposed route for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible London To Roman road from London to within the AMS would Winchester 1 Winchester crosses the be taken to protect or Order Limits twice, both in preserve in situ or by areas where the pipeline record any significant route is situated adjacent to archaeological the existing pipeline, remains that may be indicating a high potential for found (G67). pre-existing impact on any archaeological remains which may have been located in this area. However, if the Roman road were to follow this proposed route, there would be the potential for a small portion of the heritage asset to be damaged or destroyed during construction such that the heritage asset would be slightly altered. 1539 Roman Road, Low This proposed route for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible London To Roman road from London to within the AMS would Winchester 2 Winchester crosses the be taken to protect or Order Limits three times. The preserve in situ or by first crossing is near to record any significant

Page 113 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation Hardwick Lane where both archaeological the existing pipeline and the remains that may be route of the road would have found (G67). caused a pre-existing impact on the majority of any pre- existing archaeological remains, if any. However, due to the angle of this potential heritage asset, there is the possibility that some archaeological remains may still exist in situ should this be the correct location of the roadway; if archaeological remains associated with this heritage asset were to be present within this location a small section of this heritage asset overall may be damaged or destroyed. Just north of this, the projected line of this heritage asset crosses an area within the Order Limits which extends beyond the line of the pipeline route; if archaeological remains associated with this heritage asset were to be present within this location a small section of this heritage asset overall may be damaged. The third location is within the Brett Landscaping Ltd Authorised Landfill site south

Page 114 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation of Shepperton Road. There is a cropmark visible in aerial photographs which runs at this angle and therefore, if a) the landfill has not had a previous impact on this heritage asset, b) this cropmark were to correspond with a Roman road, and c) archaeological remains associated with this heritage asset were to be present within this location, then a small section of this heritage asset overall may be damaged or destroyed such that the heritage asset would be slightly altered. 1540 Roman Road, Low This proposed route for the Permanent Moderate Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible Staines To Roman road from Stained to within the AMS would Ewell Ewell intersects the Order be taken to protect or Limits either along preserve in situ or by Woodthorpe Road, where record any significant there is likely to be a pre- archaeological existing impact form the road remains that may be development on any found (G67). archaeological remain that may have been present and therefore no impact from the project, or within Fordbridge Park in an area of works for a trenchless crossing. If archaeological remains associated with this proposed route were to be

Page 115 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation present, there would be the potential for a moderate impact through partial damage or destruction of this heritage asset such that the heritage asset would be clearly modified 1553 NMP Ditch Low This heritage asset lies Permanent Minor Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible partially within the Order within the AMS would Limits at a point where the be taken to protect or pipeline route runs adjacent preserve in situ or by to the existing pipeline. There record any significant is therefore a high potential archaeological for pre-existing impact to any remains that may be archaeological remains found (G67). which may be present. There is also the potential for partial damage or removal of Asset 83 which form the broader setting of this heritage asset; however this is also likely to have a pre-existing impact from the existing pipeline route at this location. There is therefore the potential for some further partial damage or destruction to this heritage asset and its setting such that it would be slightly modified. 1554 NMP Parish Low This heritage asset lies Permanent Moderate Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible Boundary partially within the Order within the AMS would Bank Limits at a point where the be taken to protect or pipeline route runs adjacent preserve in situ or by

Page 116 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation to the existing pipeline. There record any significant is therefore a high potential archaeological for pre-existing impact to any remains that may be archaeological remains found (G67). which may be present; however, an extension of the Order Limits for access runs closely parallel to this feature and there is still the potential for some further damage or destruction such that the heritage asset would be clearly modified. 1555 NMP Field Low This heritage asset is an Permanent Minor Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible Boundary 2 isolated field boundary which within the AMS would extends across the Order be taken to protect or Limits at a point where the preserve in situ or by pipeline route runs adjacent record any significant to the existing pipeline. There archaeological is therefore a high potential remains that may be for pre-existing impact to any found (G67). archaeological remains which may be present; however, there is still the potential for some further partial damage or destruction such that the heritage asset would be slightly modified 1557 NMP Chalk Negligibl Two of the five chalk pits Permanent Moderate Negligible Measures presented Negligible Negligible Pits 2 e extend partially into the within the AMS would Order Limits. There is be taken to protect or therefore the potential for preserve in situ or by partial damage or destruction record any significant of archaeological remains archaeological

Page 117 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation such that the heritage asset remains that may be would be clearly modified. found (G67). 1559 NMP Field Medium This heritage asset lies Permanent Minor Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible System 1 partially within the Order within the AMS would Limits at a point where the be taken to protect or pipeline route runs adjacent preserve in situ or by to the existing pipeline. There record any significant is therefore a high potential archaeological for pre-existing impact to any remains that may be archaeological remains found (G67). which may be present; however, there is still the potential for some further partial damage or destruction such that the heritage asset would be slightly altered. 1570 NMP Field Low This heritage asset lies Permanent Minor Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible System 2 partially within the Order within the AMS would Limits at a point where the be taken to protect or pipeline route runs adjacent preserve in situ or by to the existing pipeline. There record any significant is therefore a high potential archaeological for pre-existing impact to any remains that may be archaeological remains found (G67). which may be present; however, there is still the potential for some further partial damage or destruction such that the heritage asset would be slightly altered. 1585 NMP Low This heritage asset extends Permanent Negligible Negligible Measures presented Negligible Negligible Trackways 3 very slightly into the Order within the AMS would Limits at its westernmost be taken to protect or extent at a location where it preserve in situ or by

Page 118 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation intersects with a modern record any significant roadway. There is therefore a archaeological very high potential for pre- remains that may be existing impact to any found (G67). archaeological remains which may be present. 1586 NMP Field Low This heritage asset is an Permanent Minor Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible System 8 extensive field system which within the AMS would lies very partially within the be taken to protect or Order Limits near to its preserve in situ or by southernmost extent and has record any significant the potential for partial archaeological damage or destruction such remains that may be that the heritage asset would found (G67). be slightly modified 1589 NMP Linear Low No physical impact on this Permanent Negligible Negligible Measures presented Negligible Negligible Features 1 heritage asset is predicted. within the AMS would There is the potential for an be taken to protect or impact to the setting of this preserve in situ or by heritage asset through partial record any significant damage or removal of the archaeological surrounding field system remains that may be (Asset 1136); however, the found (G67). route is not expected to remove a high percentage of Asset 1136 and the potential for this impact to affect our understanding of these heritage assets is therefore low. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion

Page 119 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage asset. 1593 NMP Medium No physical impact on this Permanent Negligible Negligible Measures presented Negligible Negligible Enclosure 2 heritage asset is predicted. within the AMS would There is the potential for an be taken to protect or impact to the setting of this preserve in situ or by heritage asset through partial record any significant damage or removal of the archaeological surrounding field system remains that may be (Asset 1136); however, the found (G67). route is not expected to remove a high percentage of Asset 1136 and the potential for this impact to affect our understanding of these heritage assets is therefore low. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage asset. 1603 NMP Field Low This heritage asset is a field Permanent Minor Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible Boundaries 1 system which lies partially within the AMS would within the Order Limits at a be taken to protect or point where the pipeline preserve in situ or by route runs adjacent to the record any significant existing pipeline. There is archaeological therefore a high potential for

Page 120 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation pre-existing impact to any remains that may be archaeological remains found (G67). which may be present; however, there is still the potential for some further partial damage or destruction such that the heritage asset would be slightly modified 1614 NMP Field Low This heritage asset lies Permanent Minor Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible Boundary 4 partially within the Order within the AMS would Limits at a point where the be taken to protect or pipeline route runs adjacent preserve in situ or by to the existing pipeline. There record any significant is therefore a high potential archaeological for pre-existing impact to any remains that may be archaeological remains found (G67). which may be present; however, there is still the potential for some further partial damage or destruction such that the heritage asset would be slightly altered. 1617 NMP Field Low This heritage asset is a set of Permanent Minor Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible Boundaries 2 field boundaries which lie within the AMS would partially within the Order be taken to protect or Limits at a point where the preserve in situ or by pipeline route runs adjacent record any significant to the existing pipeline. There archaeological is therefore a high potential remains that may be for pre-existing impact to any found (G67). archaeological remains which may be present; however, there is still the potential for some further

Page 121 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation partial damage or destruction such that the heritage asset would be slightly modified 1619 NMP Negligibl This heritage asset lies Permanent Minor Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible Removed e partially within the Order within the AMS would Field Limits at a point where the be taken to protect or Boundary pipeline route runs adjacent preserve in situ or by to the existing pipeline. There record any significant is therefore a high potential archaeological for pre-existing impact to any remains that may be archaeological remains found (G67). which may be present; however, there is still the potential for some further partial damage or destruction such that the heritage asset would be slightly altered. 1620 NMP Field Low This heritage asset lies Permanent Moderate Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible Boundary 5 partially within the Order within the AMS would Limits and has the potential be taken to protect or for partial damage or preserve in situ or by destruction such that the record any significant heritage asset would be archaeological clearly modified. remains that may be found (G67). 1624 NMP Dew Negligibl One of the three pits extends Permanent Moderate Negligible Measures presented Negligible Negligible Pond Or e partially into the Order Limits. within the AMS would Quarry Pit 4 There is therefore the be taken to protect or potential for partial damage preserve in situ or by or destruction of record any significant archaeological remains such archaeological that the heritage asset would remains that may be be clearly modified. found (G67).

Page 122 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1625 NMP Field Low This heritage asset is a small Permanent Minor Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible Boundaries 3 field system which lies within the AMS would partially within the Order be taken to protect or Limits at a point where the preserve in situ or by pipeline route runs adjacent record any significant to the existing pipeline. There archaeological is therefore a high potential remains that may be for pre-existing impact to any found (G67). archaeological remains which may be present; however, there is still the potential for some further partial damage or destruction such that the heritage asset would be slightly modified 1651 NMP Dew Negligibl This heritage asset lies Permanent Minor Negligible Measures presented Negligible Negligible Pond Or e partially within the Order within the AMS would Quarry Pit 15 Limits at a point where the be taken to protect or pipeline route runs adjacent preserve in situ or by to the existing pipeline. There record any significant is therefore a high potential archaeological for pre-existing impact to any remains that may be archaeological remains found (G67). which may be present; however, there is still the potential for some further partial damage or destruction such that the heritage asset would be slightly altered. 1656 NMP Barrow 3 Medium No physical impacts on this Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible heritage asset, or on other bowl barrows within the vicinity which forms the broader setting of this

Page 123 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation heritage asset, are predicted. There is the potential for a temporary impact on the setting of this heritage asset through disruption of the intervisibility between nearby barrows; but this would be a very minor change to the setting and would not effect its value. 1658 NMP Pit 12 Low One of these five small pits Permanent Minor Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible lies very slightly within the within the AMS would Order Limits at a point where be taken to protect or the pipeline route runs preserve in situ or by adjacent to the existing record any significant pipeline. There is therefore a archaeological very high potential for pre- remains that may be existing impact to any found (G67). archaeological remains which may be present. However, unless previous removal is confirmed, there is still the potential for partial removal of this heritage asset resulting in a change to archaeological materials such that the heritage asset is slightly altered. 1660 NMP Field Low This heritage asset lies Permanent Minor Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible Boundary 7 partially within the Order within the AMS would Limits at a point where the be taken to protect or pipeline route runs adjacent preserve in situ or by to the existing pipeline. There record any significant is therefore a high potential archaeological

Page 124 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation for pre-existing impact to any remains that may be archaeological remains found (G67). which may be present; however, there is still the potential for some further partial damage or destruction such that the heritage asset would be slightly modified 1661 NMP Barrow 4 Medium No physical impacts on this Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible heritage asset, or on other bowl barrows within the vicinity which forms the broader setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. There is the potential for a temporary impact on the setting of this heritage asset through disruption of the intervisibility between nearby barrows; but this would be a very minor change to the setting and would not effect its value. 1669 NMP Field Low This heritage asset lies Permanent Minor Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible Boundary 9 partially within the Order within the AMS would Limits at a point where the be taken to protect or pipeline route runs adjacent preserve in situ or by to the existing pipeline. There record any significant is therefore a high potential archaeological for pre-existing impact to any remains that may be archaeological remains found (G67). which may be present; however, there is still the potential for some further

Page 125 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation partial damage or destruction such that the heritage asset would be slightly altered. 1686 NMP Field Low This heritage asset lies very Permanent Minor Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible System 25 slightly within the Order Limit within the AMS would and, if partially damaged, be taken to protect or would be slightly altered. preserve in situ or by record any significant archaeological remains that may be found (G67). 1690 Woodcote Villa High No physical impacts on this Short term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Minor Banjo heritage asset, or on known Adverse Enclosure archaeological remains which form the setting of this heritage asset (Asset 1108), are predicted. This heritage asset is situated on a promontory over 200m north of the project, however, Jacobs Cultural Heritage Walkover Survey (20/09/2018) confirmed the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this location. There is the potential for a very minor change from that experienced within the current agricultural setting of this heritage asset. 1691 NMP Dew Negligibl One of these pits very slightly Permanent Minor Negligible Measures presented Negligible Negligible Pond Or e intersects the edge of the within the AMS would Quarry Pit 26 Order Limit. There is be taken to protect or

Page 126 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation therefore the potential for preserve in situ or by partial removal of this record any significant heritage asset resulting in a archaeological change to archaeological remains that may be materials such that the found (G67). heritage asset is slightly altered. 1702 NMP Field Low This heritage asset lies Permanent Moderate Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible System 29 partially within the Order within the AMS would Limits and has the potential be taken to protect or for partial damage or preserve in situ or by destruction such that the record any significant heritage asset would be archaeological clearly modified. remains that may be found (G67). 1704 NMP Dew Negligibl This heritage asset lies fully Permanent Major Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible Pond Or e within the Order Limits and within the AMS would Quarry Pit 30 has the potential for total be taken to protect or damage or destruction such preserve in situ or by that the heritage asset would record any significant be clearly modified. archaeological remains that may be found (G67). 1709 Linear Feature Low This heritage asset lies Permanent Moderate Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible Cropmarks partially within the Order within the AMS would Limits and has the potential be taken to protect or for partial damage or preserve in situ or by destruction such that the record any significant heritage asset would be archaeological clearly modified. remains that may be found (G67). 1710 Field System Low This heritage asset lies Permanent Moderate Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible Cropmarks 2 partially within the Order within the AMS would Limits at a location where the be taken to protect or

Page 127 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation pipeline route is adjacent to preserve in situ or by the existing pipeline record any significant indicating a high potential for archaeological pre-existing impact. There is remains that may be still the potential for partial found (G67). damage or destruction such that the heritage asset would be clearly modified 1718 Old Well Low No evidence for this feature Permanent Major Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible was noted during Jacobs within the AMS would Cultural heritage Walkover be taken to protect or Survey (05/09/2018). It is preserve in situ or by situated within close record any significant proximity to the existing archaeological pipeline indicating a high remains that may be potential for pre-existing found (G67). impact if archaeological remains had been present. If archaeological remains associated with this heritage asset are still in situ, there is the potential for full removal such that the heritage asset would be clearly modified. 1719 Water Lane Low There is the potential for the Permanent Moderate Minor Adverse Measures presented Moderate Minor partial removal of this within the AMS would Adverse heritage asset where it is be taken to protect or crossed by the Order Limits. preserve in situ or by record any significant archaeological remains that may be found (G67). 1745 Maddoxford Low This heritage asset is Short Term Moderate Minor Adverse None Proposed Moderate Minor Farmhouse situated within 100m of a Adverse

Page 128 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation proposed construction compound and therefore there is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this location such that the setting of this heritage asset is significantly modified. 1747 Granary 20M Low This heritage asset is Short Term Moderate Minor Adverse None Proposed Moderate Minor Ne Of situated within 100m of a Adverse Maddoxford proposed construction Farmhouse compound and therefore there is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this location such that the setting of this heritage asset is significantly modified. 1748 Loose Box Low This heritage asset is Short Term Moderate Minor Adverse None Proposed Moderate Minor 15M Ene Of situated within 100m of a Adverse Maddoxford proposed construction Farmhouse compound and therefore there is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this location such that the setting of this heritage asset is significantly modified. 1749 Michael House Low This heritage asset is Short Term Moderate Minor Adverse None Proposed Moderate Minor situated within 100m of a Adverse proposed construction compound and therefore there is the potential for construction to be visible

Page 129 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation and/or audible from this location such that the setting of this heritage asset is significantly modified. 1769 Manor Medium This heritage asset is Short Term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Farmhouse situated within 1km of a proposed Construction Logistics Hub and is well shielded from the project by vegetation and the current A31. Overall, there is the potential for a slight change to the setting of this heritage asset that hardly affects it. 1790 Trap Shed At Low Although the heritage asset Short Term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Minor Minor Lyeway Farm is largely shielded from the Adverse Order Limits by vegetation and topography, there is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be above that which may be experienced within the current agricultural setting and there is therefore the potential for a slight change to the setting of this historic buildings that hardly affects it. 1804 The Lawn Medium This heritage asset is Short Term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor situated within 1km of a Adverse proposed Construction Logistics Hub and is well

Page 130 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation shielded from the project by neighbouring properties and vegetation. Although the majority of traffic is likely to be routed along the A31 and would not enter through the village, there is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this location due to increased traffic through Bishop's Sutton along the B3047 Bishops Sutton Road such that the setting of this heritage asset may be noticeably changed. 1828 Hop Shed At Low This historic building is Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Bury Court shielded by neighbouring Farm properties and vegetation; however there is potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. A temporary construction logistics hub is proposed to be installed in a field southwest and across the road from this heritage asset which may create more of a visual and noise intrusion on this heritage asset and its setting than the pipe installation. There may be greater heavy vehicle traffic movement in this area during

Page 131 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation the period of construction. There is the potential for a slight change to the setting of this heritage asset that would hardly affect it. 1842 Farm Buildings Low Although the heritage asset Short Term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible At Lyeway is largely shielded from the Farm Order Limits by vegetation and topography, there is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be above that which may be experienced within the current agricultural setting and there is therefore the potential for a slight change to the setting of this historic buildings that hardly affects it. 1844 Oasthouses At Low Although the heritage asset Short Term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Glade Farm is largely shielded from the Order Limits by the neighbouring buildings and topography, there is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be above that which may be experienced within the current agricultural setting and there is therefore

Page 132 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation the potential for a slight change to the setting of this historic buildings that hardly affects it. 1857 Old Low Although the heritage asset Short Term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Carpenters, is partially shielded from the Dares Lane, Order Limits by vegetation, Ewshot, there is the potential for Farnham, construction of the project to Surrey, GU10 be visible and/or audible from 5BS, this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be significantly above that which may be experienced within the current agricultural setting; however, there is the potential for a slight change to the setting of this historic building that hardly affects it. 1860 Ewshot Village Low Although the heritage asset Short Term Minor Negligible None Proposed Minor Negligible Hall, Tadpole is partially shielded from the Lane, Ewshot, Order Limits by vegetation, Farnham, there is the potential for Surrey construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. There is the potential for a noticeable change to the setting of this historic building. 1864 Well, Heath Low Although the heritage asset Short Term Minor Negligible None Proposed Minor Negligible Lane, is very well shielded from the Crondall, Order Limits by vegetation, Farnham, there is the potential for Surrey construction of the project to

Page 133 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. There is the potential for a noticeable change to the setting of this historic building. 1869 The Ship Inn Low This heritage asset is Short Term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor situated within close Adverse proximity to the Order Limit. The pipeline route at this location follows the line of Ship Lane and Ringwood Road. There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this location on the setting of this heritage asset; however, the heritage asset's current proximity to major thoroughfares indicates that this impact is unlikely to result in more than a noticeable change to the setting of this heritage asset. 1875 Farnborough Low Due to the height of the Short Term Minor Negligible None Proposed Minor Negligible Railway railway bridge and the Station, Union potential for views from it, Street, there is the potential for Farnborough, construction to be visible Hampshire, and/or audible from this GU14 7NL location such that the setting of this heritage asset is noticeably changed. However, the infrastructure and transportation related

Page 134 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation character of this heritage asset and its setting means that the value of this heritage asset would not be affected. 1877 The Lodge, Low Although the heritage asset Short Term Minor Negligible None Proposed Minor Negligible 283 is very well shielded from the Farnborough Order Limits by neighbouring Road, properties, there is the Farnborough, potential for construction of Hampshire, the project to be visible GU14 8AR and/or audible from this heritage asset. There is the potential for a noticeable change to the setting of this historic building; however its value will not be affected. 1883 War Memorial, Low It is unclear if this memorial Short Term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible St Peters is situated inside the church Church, building or within the Frimley churchyard; if exterior to the church there is the potential for increased construction to be visible and/or audible from this location on the setting of this heritage asset due to construction traffic in relation to the Construction Compound off of Frimley Green Road. This would result in a slight change to the setting of this historic building that hardly affects it. 1885 Halebourne Low Although the heritage asset Short Term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible House is shielded by vegetation and

Page 135 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation neighbouring properties, there is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be above that which may be experienced within the current agricultural setting and there is therefore the potential for a slight change to the setting of this historic buildings that hardly affects it. 1889 Alma House Low Although the heritage asset Short Term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible is largely shielded from the Order Limits by dense vegetation it is situated near to a roadway which has the potential for increased noise and visual intrusion due to construction traffic. There is the potential for a change to the setting of this historic building that hardly affects it. 1891 256, 258, 260 Low Although this heritage asset Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Upper is very well shielded by Chobham vegetation, there is potential Road for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be significantly more than that experienced from the junction of the B311 and B3015, resulting in very

Page 136 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation minor changes to the setting of this heritage asset. 1892 Frimley Low Although well shielded by Short Term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Church Of vegetation and neighbouring Adverse England properties, there is the Primary potential for the construction School of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. There is also the potential for the removal of trees within sightline of this heritage asset, however, this vegetation does not contribute to the value of this heritage asset or characterise its setting. Overall there is the potential for a noticeable change to the setting of this historic building. 1899 War Memorial, Low It is unclear if this memorial Short Term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible St Peters is situated inside the church Church, building or within the Frimley churchyard; if exterior to the church there is the potential for increased construction to be visible and/or audible from this location on the setting of this heritage asset due to construction traffic in relation to the Construction Compound off of Frimley Green Road. This would result in a slight change to

Page 137 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation the setting of this historic building that hardly affects it. 1900 War Memorial, Low It is unclear if this memorial Short Term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible St Peters is situated inside the church Church, building or within the Frimley churchyard; if exterior to the church there is the potential for increased construction to be visible and/or audible from this location on the setting of this heritage asset due to construction traffic in relation to the Construction Compound off of Frimley Green Road. This would result in a slight change to the setting of this historic building that hardly affects it. 1902 War Memorial, Low It is unclear if this memorial Short Term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible St Peters is situated inside the church Church, building or within the Frimley churchyard; if exterior to the church there is the potential for increased construction to be visible and/or audible from this location on the setting of this heritage asset due to construction traffic in relation to the Construction Compound off of Frimley Green Road. This would result in a slight change to the setting of this historic building that hardly affects it.

Page 138 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1921 Yockley House Low This heritage asset lies Short Term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible opposite the B3015 road from the Order Limits and is well shielded by neighbouring properties and surrounding vegetation. However, the proximity of this heritage asset to the Order Limits indicates the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this location during construction on the setting of this heritage asset that hardly affects it. 1925 Whitmore Low This heritage asset lies over Short Term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Farm 400m from a Proposed Logistics Hub. There is a potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this location from increased construction traffic along Church Road and New Road resulting in a slight change to the setting of this historic building that hardly affects it. 1927 Audley Low This heritage asset lies over Short Term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Cottage And 400m from a Proposed Corner Logistics Hub. There is a Cottage potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this location from increased construction traffic along Church Road and New Road

Page 139 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation resulting in a slight change to the setting of this historic building that hardly affects it. 1928 Vine Cottage Low This heritage asset lies over Short Term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible 400m from a Proposed Logistics Hub. There is a potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this location from increased construction traffic along Church Road and New Road resulting in a slight change to the setting of this historic building that hardly affects it. 1929 Garden Low This heritage asset lies over Short Term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Cottage 400m from a Proposed Logistics Hub. There is a potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this location from increased construction traffic along Church Road and New Road resulting in a slight change to the setting of this historic building that hardly affects it. 1930 Heatherside Low There are no impact Permanent Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible House & pathways for effects on Heatherside setting due to the distance Court and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. This heritage asset is no longer physically associated with Heatherside House Gardens (Asset 772)

Page 140 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation which historically formed the setting of this historic building and any potential physical impact on Asset 772 would have the potential for a slight change to the setting of Asset 1930 that would hardly affect it. 1931 The Hedges Low This heritage asset lies over Short Term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible 400m from a Proposed Logistics Hub. There is a potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this location from increased construction traffic along Church Road and New Road resulting in a slight change to the setting of this historic building that hardly affects it. 1933 High Lodge Low This heritage asset is well Short Term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible shielded from the Order Limits by dense vegetation and surrounding properties. The pipeline route follows a current road at this location. Any construction to be visible and/or audible from this location during construction is not anticipated to be significantly changed from that caused by the current roadway. There is therefore the potential for, at most, a slight change to the setting of

Page 141 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation this historic building that hardly affects it. 1934 Heydon Low This heritage asset lies over Short Term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Cottages 400m from a Proposed Logistics Hub. There is a potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this location from increased construction traffic along Church Road and New Road resulting in a slight change to the setting of this historic building that hardly affects it. 1947 Walled Garden Low Although well shielded by Short Term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible (Laleham vegetation, there is potential Nursery)/Gard for construction of the project ner's Cottage to be visible and/or audible (White House) from this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be significantly more than that experienced within the agricultural and industrial setting (the land crossed by the project at this location has been utilised for quarrying). There is the potential for increased construction to be visible and/or audible from this location along Shepperton Road due to construction related traffic. This has the potential for slight changes to the setting of this historic building that hardly affects it.

Page 142 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1948 Laleham Low Although well shielded by Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Abbey vegetation, there is potential Icehouse for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be significantly more than that experienced within the agricultural and industrial setting (the land crossed by the project at this location has been utilised for quarrying and landfill), resulting in changes to the setting of this heritage asset which would hardly affect it. 1949 School Low Although well shielded by Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Cottages vegetation and neighbouring properties, there is potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be significantly more than that experienced within the agricultural and industrial setting (the land crossed by the project at this location has been utilised for quarrying), resulting in very minor changes to the setting of this heritage asset. 1950 Laleham Low Although well shielded by Short Term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Village Hall vegetation and neighbouring properties, there is potential for construction of the project

Page 143 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be significantly more than that experienced within the agricultural and industrial setting (the land crossed by the project at this location has been utilised for quarrying), resulting in changes to the setting of this heritage asset which would hardly affect it. 1951 Nos.1&2 Low Although well shielded by Short Term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible (Home Farm vegetation and neighbouring Cottages) properties, there is potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be significantly more than that experienced within the agricultural and industrial setting (the land crossed by the project at this location has been utilised for quarrying), resulting in changes to the setting of this heritage asset which would hardly affect it. 1952 The Feathers Low Although well shielded by Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Public House vegetation, there is potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be significantly

Page 144 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation more than that experienced within the agricultural and industrial setting (the land crossed by the project at this location has been utilised for quarrying), resulting in changes to the setting of this heritage asset which would hardly affect it. 1953 The Limes Low Although well shielded by Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible vegetation, there is potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be significantly more than that experienced within the agricultural and industrial setting (the land crossed by the project at this location has been utilised for quarrying), resulting in changes to the setting of this heritage asset which would hardly affect it. 1954 South Low This heritage asset is Short Term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Lodge,314 situated at the entrance to Adverse Farnborough the Farnborough Hill School Road,Farnbor along a road which would be ough,Hampshi utilised further during re,Gu14 8As, construction. The heritage asset is well shielded from the pipeline route by vegetation; however, there is the potential for construction

Page 145 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation to be visible and/or audible from this location due to construction related traffic. 1959 Laleham C Of Low There is potential for Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible E Primary construction of the project to School (Main be visible and/or audible from Building) this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be significantly more than that experienced within the agricultural and industrial setting (the land crossed by the project at this location has been utilised for quarrying), resulting in very minor changes to the setting of this heritage asset. 1960 Nos.35-39, Low Although well shielded by Short Term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Shepperton vegetation, there is potential Road for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this heritage asset. This is unlikely to be significantly more than that experienced within the agricultural and industrial setting (the land crossed by the project at this location has been utilised for quarrying). There is the potential for increased construction to be visible and/or audible from this location along Shepperton Road due to construction related traffic. This has the

Page 146 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation potential for slight changes to the setting of this historic building that hardly affects it. 1961 Former Post Low There is the potential for Short term Minor Negligible None Proposed Minor Negligible Office increased noise and visual intrusion on the setting of this heritage asset as it is situated along a main route which may have increased traffic due to construction vehicles. This may result in a noticeable change to the setting of this historic building. 1962 Clarendon Low The Order Limits border this Short term Moderate Minor Adverse None Proposed Moderate Minor County First heritage asset to the north, Adverse School east and south, utilising the paved areas and sports fields for the installation of a trenchless crossing. There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this location on the setting of this heritage asset and for the removal of bordering vegetation. The setting of this heritage asset is not inherent to its value; however, the proximity indicates the potential for changes to the setting of this historic buildings such that it is significantly modified.

Page 147 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1964 Cartshed 25M Low This heritage asset is Short Term Moderate Minor Adverse None Proposed Moderate Minor Ese Of situated within 100m of a Adverse Maddoxford proposed construction Farmhouse compound and therefore there is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this location such that the setting of this heritage asset is significantly modified. 1978 Geophysical Low This potential archaeological Permanent Moderate Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible Survey feature extends beyond the within the AMS would Archaeological Order Limits. There is the be taken to protect or Feature 1 potential for partial damage preserve in situ or by or removal of this heritage record any significant asset resulting in a change to archaeological archaeological materials remains that may be such that the heritage asset found (G67). is clearly modified. 1981 Geophysical Low This Geophysical Survey Permanent Moderate Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible Survey Archaeological Feature within the AMS would Archaeological extends beyond the Order be taken to protect or Feature 4 Limits. There is the possible preserve in situ or by for partial damage or removal record any significant of this heritage asset archaeological resulting in a change to remains that may be archaeological materials found (G67). such that the heritage asset is clearly modified. 1994 Geophysical Low This Geophysical Survey Permanent Moderate Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible Survey Archaeological Feature within the AMS would Archaeological extends beyond the Order be taken to protect or Feature 17 Limits and may form a part of preserve in situ or by the broader field system record any significant

Page 148 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation (Asset 1631). There is the archaeological potential for partial damage remains that may be or removal of this heritage found (G67). asset resulting in a change to archaeological materials such that the heritage asset is clearly modified. 1997 Geophysical Low This Geophysical Survey Permanent Moderate Minor Adverse Measures presented Negligible Negligible Survey Archaeological Feature within the AMS would Archaeological extends beyond the Order be taken to protect or Feature 20 Limits and may form a part of preserve in situ or by the broader field system record any significant represented by the parallel archaeological field boundaries Asset 1679 remains that may be and Asset 1674). There is found (G67). the potential for partial damage or removal of this heritage asset resulting in a change to archaeological materials such that the heritage asset is clearly modified. 2019 Ropley Lodge Medium This heritage asset is Short Term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible situated within 500m of a Construction Logistics Hub. There is the potential for noise and visual intrusion through increased construction traffic along the A31. This has the potential for a very slight change in the setting of this heritage asset that hardly affects it.

Page 149 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation HLT01 19th Century Low There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Plantations partial removal of historic Adverse (General) landscape elements associated with this HLT, namely trees and hedgerow boundaries. There is also the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this HLT; however this is unlikely to be a significant change from that which arised from normal plantation machinery. Overall this may result in limited changes to historic landscape character. HLT02 19th Century Low There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Wood Pasture partial removal of historic Adverse landscape elements associated with this HLT, namely vegetation. No hedgerows associated with this HLT have been identified within the Order Limits. There is also the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this HLT. Overall this may result in limited changes to historic landscape character. HLT03 Large Irregular Low There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Assarts With partial removal of historic Adverse Wavy Or landscape elements Mixed associated with this HLT, Boundaries including historically

Page 150 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation important hedgerows. There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this HLT; however this is unlikely to be a significant change from that which arises from normal agricultural machinery. Overall this may result in limited changes to historic landscape character. HLT04 Medium Low There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Irregular partial removal of historic Adverse Assarts And landscape elements Copses With associated with this HLT, Wavy including historically Boundaries important hedgerows. There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this HLT; however this is unlikely to be a significant change from that which arises from normal agricultural machinery. Overall this may result in limited changes to historic landscape character. HLT05 Regular Low No physical impacts to this Short Term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Negligible Assarts With HLT are predicted. There is Straight the potential for construction Boundaries to be visible and/or audible from this HLT; however this is unlikely to be a significant change from that which

Page 151 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation arises from normal agricultural machinery. This may result in a very small change to the historic landscape character. HLT06 Small Irregular Medium The pipeline route at this Permanent Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Assarts point largely follows the Adverse Intermixed existing pipeline route, With suggesting pre-existing Woodland impact to any historic landscape elements. However, there is still the potential for the removal of historic landscape elements associated with this HLT, namely vegetation including historically important hedgerows. There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this HLT; however this is unlikely to be a significant change from that which arises from normal agricultural machinery. Overall this may result in limited changes to historic landscape character. HLT08 Other Medium No physical impacts to this Short Term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Negligible Commons And HLT are predicted. There is Greens the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this HLT resulting in a

Page 152 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation very small change to the historic landscape character. HLT09 Wooded Over Low There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Commons partial removal of historic Adverse landscape elements associated with this HLT, namely vegetation. No hedgerows associated with this HLT have been identified within the Order Limits. There is also the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this HLT. Overall this may result in limited changes to historic landscape character. HLT10 Motorway Negligibl No physical impacts to this Short Term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Negligible Junctions e HLT are predicted. There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this HLT resulting in a very small change to the historic landscape character. HLT11 Active And Negligibl There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Disused e partial removal of historic Adverse Gravel landscape elements Workings associated with this HLT and for construction to be visible and/or audible from this HLT. For active gravel workings, any noise or visual intrusion would be consistent with that of the extraction machinery, however for disused gravel

Page 153 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation workings this intrusion may be more noteable. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character. HLT12 Large Regular Low There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Fields With partial removal of historic Adverse Straight landscape elements Boundaries associated with this HLT, (Parliamentary including hedgerows. There Enclosure is also the potential for Type) construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this HLT; however this is unlikely to be a significant change from that which arises from normal agricultural machinery. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character. HLT13 Parkland Low No physical impacts to this Short Term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Negligible Conversion To HLT are predicted. There is Arable the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this HLT; however this is unlikely to be a significant change from that which arises from normal agricultural machinery. Overall, there is the potential for a very small change to the historic landscape character.

Page 154 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation HLT14 'Prairie' Fields Negligibl There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Negligible None Proposed Minor Negligible (Large e partial removal of historic Enclosures landscape elements With Extensive associated with this HLT, Boundary including hedgerows. There Loss) is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this HLT; however this is unlikely to be a significant change from that which arises from normal agricultural machinery. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character. HLT15 Variable Size, Medium There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Semi-Regular partial removal of historic Adverse Fields With landscape elements Straight associated with this HLT, Boundaries including historically (Parliamentary important hedgerows. There Enclosure is the potential for Type) construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this HLT; however this is unlikely to be a significant change from that which arises from normal agricultural machinery. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character.

Page 155 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation HLT16 Fields Low There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Predominantly partial removal of historic Adverse Bounded By landscape elements Tracks, associated with this HLT, Roads, Other including historically Rights Of Way important hedgerows. There is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this HLT; however this is unlikely to be a significant change from that which arises from normal agricultural machinery. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character. HLT17 Regular Form Low There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor With Wavy partial removal of historic Adverse Boundaries landscape elements (Late Medieval associated with this HLT, To 17th / 18th including historically Century important hedgerows. There Enclosure) is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this HLT; however this is unlikely to be a significant change from that which arises from normal agricultural machinery. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character.

Page 156 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation HLT19 Small Medium There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Rectilinear partial removal of historic Adverse Fields With landscape elements Wavy associated with this HLT, Boundaries including historically important hedgerows. There is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this HLT; however this is unlikely to be a significant change from that which arises from normal agricultural machinery. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character. HLT20 Enclosed Low No physical impacts to this Short Term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Negligible Heath And HLT are predicted. There is Scrub the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from parcels of this HLT resulting in a very small change to the historic landscape character. HLT21 Unenclosed Medium There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Heath And partial removal of historic Adverse Scrub landscape elements associated with this HLT, such as hedgerows. There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this HLT. Overall, there is the potential for limited

Page 157 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation changes to the historic landscape character. HLT22 19th Century Low There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Heathland partial removal of historic Adverse Plantations landscape elements associated with this HLT. There is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this HLT; however this is unlikely to be a significant change from that which arises from normal plantation machinery. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character. HLT23 Nurseries With Negligibl There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Negligible None Proposed Minor Negligible Glass Houses e partial removal of historic landscape elements associated with this HLT, such as hedgerows. There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this HLT. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character. HLT24 Nurseries Negligibl There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Negligible None Proposed Minor Negligible Without Glass e partial removal of historic Houses landscape elements associated with this HLT, such as hedgerows. There is the potential for construction

Page 158 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation to be visible and/or audible from this HLT. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character. HLT25 Irregular Low There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Straight partial removal of historic Adverse Boundaries landscape elements associated with this HLT, such as hedgerows. There is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this HLT; however this is unlikely to be a significant change from that which arises from normal agricultural machinery. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character. HLT26 20th Century Low There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Military partial removal of historic Adverse landscape elements associated with this HLT. There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this HLT. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character. HLT27 Industrial Negligibl There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Negligible None Proposed Minor Negligible Complexes e partial removal of historic And Factories landscape elements associated with this HLT,

Page 159 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation including hedgerows. There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this HLT. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character. HLT28 Reservoirs Negligibl No physical impacts to this Short Term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Negligible And Water e HLT are predicted. There is Treatment the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from parcels of this HLT resulting in a very small change to the historic landscape character. HLT29 Other Pre- Medium No physical impacts to this Short Term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Negligible 1810 HLT are predicted. There is Woodland the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from parcels of this HLT resulting in a very small change to the historic landscape character. HLT30 Pre 1810 Medium There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Heathland / partial removal of historic Adverse Enclosed landscape elements Woodland associated with this HLT. There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this HLT. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character.

Page 160 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation HLT31 19th Century Medium There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor And Later partial removal of historic Adverse Parkland landscape elements associated with this HLT, including hederows. There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this HLT. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character. HLT32 Treloars Low The Order Limits extend Short term Minor Negligible None Proposed Minor Negligible College through the grounds of this college. The grounds are reputed to be an historic deer park but no historic landscape elements are known to exist in situ. There is also a construction logistics hub located to the immediate west of this HLT. There is the potential for the partial removal of historic landscape elements, such as hedgerows, associated with this HLT resulting in limited changes to historic landscape character. There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this location; however, the presence of the A31 within the immediate vicinity indicates that there is likely to

Page 161 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation be a low level of traffic noise already present within the general environs. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character. HLT33 19th Century Low No physical impacts to this Short Term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Negligible And Later HLT are predicted. There is Parkland And the potential for construction Large to be visible and/or audible Designed from parcels of this HLT Gardens resulting in a very small change to the historic landscape character. HLT35 Smaller Low There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Designed partial removal of historic Adverse Gardens landscape elements associated with this HLT. There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this HLT. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character. HLT36 Medium Low There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Regular Fields partial removal of historic Adverse With Straight landscape elements Boundaries associated with this HLT, (Parliamentary including hedgerows. There Type is the potential for Enclosure) construction to be visible and/or audible from this HLT. Overall, there is the potential

Page 162 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation for limited changes to the historic landscape character. HLT37 Small Regular Low There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Fields With partial removal of historic Adverse Straight landscape elements Boundaries associated with this HLT, (Parliamentary including hedgerows. There Type is the potential for Enclosure) construction to be visible and/or audible from this HLT. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character. HLT38 Post 1810 Low There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Settlement partial removal of historic Adverse (General) landscape elements associated with this HLT, including hedgerows. There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this HLT. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character. HLT39 Scattered Low No physical impacts to this Short Term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Negligible Settlement HLT are predicted. There is With Paddocks the potential for construction (Post 1810 to be visible and/or audible Extent) from parcels of this HLT resulting in a very small change to the historic landscape character.

Page 163 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation HLT40 Golf Courses Negligibl There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Negligible None Proposed Minor Negligible e partial removal of historic landscape elements associated with this HLT, including hedgerows. There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this HLT. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character. HLT41 Major Sports Low There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Fields And partial removal of historic Adverse Complexes landscape elements associated with this HLT, including hedgerows. There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this HLT. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character. HLT42 Marinas Low There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor partial removal of historic Adverse landscape elements associated with this HLT, including hedgerows. There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this HLT. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character.

Page 164 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation HLT43 Motor Racing Low No physical impacts to this Short Term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Negligible Tracks & HLT are predicted. There is Vehicle the potential for construction Testing Areas to be visible and/or audible from parcels of this HLT resulting in a very small change to the historic landscape character. HLT44 Racecourses Low There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor partial removal of historic Adverse landscape elements associated with this HLT. There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this HLT. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character. HLT45 Studs And Low There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Horse partial removal of historic Adverse Paddocks landscape elements associated with this HLT, including hedgerows. There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this HLT. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character. HLT46 Caravan Sites Negligibl There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Negligible None Proposed Minor Negligible e partial removal of historic landscape elements associated with this HLT. There is the potential for

Page 165 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation construction to be visible and/or audible from this HLT. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character. HLT47 Common Edge Negligibl No physical impacts to this Short Term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Negligible And Road e HLT are predicted. There is Side Waste the potential for construction Post-1940 to be visible and/or audible from parcels of this HLT resulting in a very small change to the historic landscape character. HLT48 Common Negligibl There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Negligible None Proposed Minor Negligible Edge/Roadsid e partial removal of historic e Waste landscape elements Settlement associated with this HLT. (Post-1811 & There is the potential for Pre-1940 construction to be visible Extent) and/or audible from this HLT. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character. HLT49 Hospital Low No physical impacts to this Short Term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Negligible Complexes HLT are predicted. There is (I.E. Not the potential for construction Within to be visible and/or audible Settlements) from parcels of this HLT resulting in a very small change to the historic landscape character. HLT50 Large Low No physical impacts to this Short Term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Negligible Cemeteries HLT are predicted. There is (I.E. Not the potential for construction

Page 166 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation Adjacent To to be visible and/or audible Churches) from parcels of this HLT resulting in a very small change to the historic landscape character. HLT51 Post 1811 & Low No physical impacts to this Short Term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Negligible Pre-1940 HLT are predicted. There is Settlement - the potential for construction Small Scale to be visible and/or audible from parcels of this HLT resulting in a very small change to the historic landscape character. HLT52 Post-1811 & Low There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Pre-1940 partial removal of historic Adverse Settlement - landscape elements Large Scale associated with this HLT. Estates There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this HLT. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character. HLT53 Post-1811 & Low There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Pre-1940 partial removal of historic Adverse Settlement - landscape elements Medium associated with this HLT. Estates there is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this HLT. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character.

Page 167 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation HLT54 Post-1940 Negligibl No physical impacts to this Short Term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Negligible Luxury Estates e HLT are predicted. There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from parcels of this HLT resulting in a very small change to the historic landscape character. HLT55 Post-1940 Negligibl There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Negligible None Proposed Minor Negligible Small To e partial removal of historic Medium landscape elements Estates associated with this HLT, including hedgerows. There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this HLT. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character. HLT56 Regular Negligibl There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Negligible None Proposed Minor Negligible Settlement e partial removal of historic With Paddocks landscape elements Post-1940 associated with this HLT, including hedgerows. There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this HLT. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character. HLT57 Scattered Low There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Settlement partial removal of historic Adverse With Paddocks landscape elements (Post-1811 & associated with this HLT.

Page 168 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation Pre-1940 There is the potential for Extent) construction to be visible and/or audible from this HLT. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character. HLT58 Village Or Medium There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Hamlet (Pre- partial removal of historic Adverse 1811 Extent) landscape elements associated with this HLT, including hedgerows. There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this HLT. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character. HLT59 Miscellaneous Low There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Valley Bottom partial removal of historic Adverse Paddocks And landscape elements Pastures associated with this HLT, including hedgerows. There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this HLT. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character. HLT60 Miscellaneous Low There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Valley Floor partial removal of historic Adverse Fields And landscape elements Pastures associated with this HLT, including hedgerows. There is the potential for

Page 169 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation construction to be visible and/or audible from this HLT. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character. HLT61 Post-1811 Low No physical impacts to this Short Term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Negligible Fishponds, HLT are predicted. There is Hatchery the potential for construction Complexes, to be visible and/or audible 'Natural' from parcels of this HLT Ponds And resulting in a very small Lakes change to the historic landscape character. HLT63 Valley Floor Medium There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Woodlands partial removal of historic Adverse landscape elements associated with this HLT. There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this HLT. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character. HLT64 Water Medium There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Meadows Or partial removal of historic Adverse Common landscape elements Meadows associated with this HLT, including hedgerows. There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this HLT. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character.

Page 170 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation HLT67 Alder Carr Medium No physical impacts to this Short Term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Negligible (Wet Woods HLT are predicted. There is Next To Rivers the potential for construction And Wetlands) to be visible and/or audible from parcels of this HLT resulting in a very small change to the historic landscape character. HLT68 Assarted Pre- Medium There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor 1811 partial removal of historic Adverse Woodland landscape elements associated with this HLT. There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this HLT. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character. HLT69 Regenerated Low There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Secondary partial removal of historic Adverse Woodland On landscape elements Farmland - Not associated with this HLT. Plantations There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this HLT. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character. HLT70 Replanted Low There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Assarted Pre- partial removal of historic Adverse 1811 landscape elements Woodland associated with this HLT. There is the potential for construction to be visible

Page 171 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation and/or audible from this HLT. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character. HLT71 Assarted Pre Medium There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor 1810 Wood partial removal of historic Adverse Pasture landscape elements associated with this HLT, including hedgerows. There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this HLT. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character. HLT72 Replanted Low There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Other Pre- partial removal of historic Adverse 1810 landscape elements Woodland associated with this HLT. There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this HLT. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character. HLT73 Arboreta Medium No physical impacts to this Short Term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Negligible HLT are predicted. There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from parcels of this HLT resulting in a very small change to the historic landscape character.

Page 172 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation HLT75 Town Pre- Medium No physical impacts to this Short Term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Negligible 1811 Extent HLT are predicted. There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from parcels of this HLT resulting in a very small change to the historic landscape character. HLT76 Sewage Negligibl No physical impacts to this Short Term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Negligible Works/Water e HLT are predicted. There is Treatment the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from parcels of this HLT resulting in a very small change to the historic landscape character. HLT80 Business Negligibl No physical impacts to this Short Term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Negligible Centre e HLT are predicted. There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from parcels of this HLT resulting in a very small change to the historic landscape character. HLT81 Open Low There is the potential for the Permanent Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Countryside / partial removal of historic Adverse Farmland landscape elements associated with this HLT. There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this HLT. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character.

Page 173 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation HLT82 Public Open Low No physical impacts to this Short Term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Negligible Space HLT are predicted. There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from parcels of this HLT resulting in a very small change to the historic landscape character. HLT83 Belmore Medium No physical impacts to this Short term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Minor House Park HLT are predicted. The Adverse distance between this HLT and the Order Limits, in conjunction with the dense vegetation bordering this historic landscape which will provide significant shielding from any potential construction to be visible and/or audible from this location. There is the potential for, at most, a very small change to the historic landscape character of this HLT. HLT85 Woodcote Medium No physical impacts to this Short term Negligible Minor Adverse None Proposed Negligible Minor Manor Park HLT are predicted. The Adverse distance between this HLT and the Order Limits, in conjunction with the dense vegetation bordering this historic landscape will provide significant shielding from any potential construction to be visible

Page 174 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation and/or audible from this location. There is the potential for, at most, a very small change to the historic landscape character of this HLT. HLT86 Brockwood Medium The southwestern-most Short term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Park corner of this park is within Adverse the Order Limits; however, the vegetation marked on the 1888 Ordnance Survey mapping at this location has already been removed. No impact to historic landscape elements is therefore predicted. There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this HLT; however it is unlikely to be significantly above that which would result from normal agricultural machinery operating within the vicinity. Due to the proximity of this HLT to the Order Limits, this has the potential to result in limited changes to the historic landscape character of this HLT. HLT87 Chawton High No physical impacts to this Short term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor House HLT HLT are predicted. The close Adverse proximity of the Registered Park and Garden to the

Page 175 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation Order Limits indicates that there is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this location; however, the pipeline route is situated to the south and east of this HLT, and the grounds on these sides are bordered by dense treed vegetation (Jacobs Cultural Heritage Walkover Survey July 2018) which will provide significant shielding. There is also unlikely to be a large increase in noise or visual intrusion beyond what would result from normal agricultural machinery operating within the vicinity. The potential for noise and visual impact would therefore result in, at most, limited changes to historic landscape character of this HLT. HLT89 Defense Area Medium There will be no physical Short term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor 34 Ewshot impact to any of the Adverse associated archaeological remains which are situated within Defense Area 34 and which contribute to this HLT's value. There is also the potential for the removal of landscape elements of this

Page 176 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation HLT, however the surrounding vegetation does not contribute to our understanding of this HLT. Construction would be visible and audible as the pipeline route is located within the boundaries of this HLT. Overall there is the potential for changes to the setting of this HLT but which would not affect its value. HLT90 Cove Brook Low It is unclear to what extent Permanent Minor Negligible None Proposed Minor Negligible Linear Park the Cove Brook Linear Park extends outwards from the Cove Brook itself. The Cove Brook itself is crossed by a HDD trenchless crossing just north of a railway line. There is the potential for some removal of vegetation associated with the park and for construction to be visible and/or audible from this location during construction. As a modern development within a heavily urbanised environment, these potential impacts may result in limited changes to the historic landscape character of this HLT. HLT91 Queen Low This HLT is a modern park Short term Moderate Minor Adverse None Proposed Moderate Minor Elizabeth Park built within the grounds of a Adverse

Page 177 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 19th century estate. There is the potential for the removal of vegetation, namely trees, as this park is densely planted. The Order Limits follows the route of the existing pipeline where it crosses through this park, which suggests that the vegetation would have already been impacted during the previous installation and are not, therefore, historic. There is also the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this location during construction. Overall this may result in moderate changes to the historic landscape character of this HLT. HLT93 Farnborough Medium The Order Limits roughly Short term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor Hill School follow the boundary of this Adverse HLT, with the addition of a temporary construction compound in a field to the north of this HLT and a drive pit/receiving compound to the southwest of this HLT for an auger bored trenchless crossing. Construction of the project will therefore be fully visible and audible within this HLT. This HLT includes

Page 178 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation historic landscape elements, namely vegetation, and the potential removal of these would have a permanent adverse effect on this HLT; however, the Order Limit has been designed to avoid the majority of the trees on the grounds, and the removal of vegetation will be limited and primarily restricted to the area of the existing pipeline. This HLT was visited during the Jacobs Heritage Walkover Survey (September 2018) and it was noted that the impact of the existing pipeline, which cuts through the grounds rather than following the boundary edge (which is the proposed pipeline route), is negligible. Overall, there is a potential for changes to the a few key historic landscape elements and temporary and noticeable, but temporary differences in noise quality, resulting in limited changes to historic landscape character. HLT100 Botley Park, Low No physical impacts to this Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Homewood HLT are predicted. There is Park the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible

Page 179 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation from this HLT; however, there is significant shielding from dense vegetation and the surrounding built environment which indicates that, at most, this would result in a very small change to the historic landscape character. HLT101 Hardwick Low Although the Order Limits Permanent Minor Negligible None Proposed Minor Negligible Court Farm, cross through this HLT, it Hardwick follows the line of the existing Lane, Lyne, pipeline and there are large Chertsey gaps in the vegetation where the Order Limits cross the field boundaries. No hedgerows associated with this HLT have been identified within the Order Limits. There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this location; however this is unlikely to be a significant change from that which arises from normal agricultural machinery. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character. HLT102 Rutherewyke Low There is the potential for the Short term Minor Negligible None Proposed Minor Negligible House partial removal of historic landscape elements associated with this HLT,

Page 180 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation namely vegetation. No hedgerows associated with this HLT have been identified within the Order Limits. There is also the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this HLT. Overall this may result in limited changes to historic landscape character. HLT103 Sandgates, Low The Order Limits cross over Short term Minor Negligible None Proposed Minor Negligible Guildford the historic boundary of this Road, HLT at the point where it has Chertsey been overbuilt by the M25 London Orbital Motorway. The pipeline route comprises a HDD trenchless crossing at this point. Therefore no further physical impact to associated historic landscape elements is predicted. There is the potential for construction to be visible and/or audible from this location to the south of the property at the drive pit/receiving compound for the trenchless crossing; however, this HLT is well shielded by vegetation and the potential intrusion is unlikely to be significantly above that which would result from this HLTs current proximity to the London

Page 181 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation Orbital Motorway. Overall this may result in limited changes to historic landscape character. HLT104 Woburn Hill Low No physical impacts to this Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible House, HLT are predicted. There is Woburn Hill, the potential for construction Addlestone, to be visible and/or audible Chertsey from this HLT; however, there is significant shielding from dense vegetation and the surrounding built environment. Overall, at most, this would result in a very small change to the historic landscape character. HLT105 Woburn Farm High No physical impacts to this Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible HLT are predicted. The visual quality and noise levels of this HLT are already impacted by the fringe-urban environment in which it is situated. Overall construction may result in very small changes to historic landscape character. HLT106 Clare Park Low The Order Limits extend Permanent Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor through the historic boundary Adverse of Clare Park; however the area of potential impact now primarily comprises an agricultural field under plough and a modern golf course. Although there is

Page 182 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation significant modern intrusion, there is the potential for partial damage or destruction of historic landscape elements, including historically important hedgerow. At most, this would be a change to a few key historic landscape elements and for construction to be visible and/or audible from this location resulting in limited changes to the historic landscape character. HLT108 Preshaw Medium No physical impacts to this Short term Minor Minor Adverse None Proposed Minor Minor House HLT are predicted. The area Adverse of this HLT which extends to within the study area comprises dense woodland which provides shielding for the further Preshaw House grounds. There is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this HLT; however this is unlikely to be a significant change from that which arises from normal agricultural machinery. Overall, there is the potential for limited changes to the historic landscape character.

Page 183 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Description - Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation HLT111 Manx Farm Low No physical impacts to this Short term Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Parkland HLT are predicted. There is the potential for construction of the project to be visible and/or audible from this HLT; however this is unlikely to be a significant change from that which arises from normal agricultural machinery. Overall, there is the potential for a very small change to the historic landscape character.

Table 1.3 Heritage Assets with No Impact Prior to Good Practice Measures During Construction Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 4 Old Gate Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible House effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 6 Brick Lined Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Well previously destroyed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 7 Prehistoric Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Burnt Flint previously removed and cannot Change Scatter therefore be impacted further.

Page 184 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 10 Prehistoric Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Flints And previously removed and cannot Change Multi-Period therefore be impacted further. Pottery Sherds 11 Stapleford Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farmhouse effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 13 Uplands Farm: Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Barn 30 Yds effects on setting due to the Change South West Of distance and inherent shielding Farmhouse between the project and this heritage asset. 15 Farmhouse At Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Uplands Farm effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 20 Roman Kiln Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously destroyed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 37 Mitford Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 39 Godders Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 185 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 40 Post Medieval Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Quarry 2 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 41 Maddoxford Negligible If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farm present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 43 Newhouse Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farm; Granary effects on setting due to the Change 30 Yds East distance and inherent shielding Of Farmhouse between the project and this heritage asset. 44 Newhouse Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farm; Small effects on setting due to the Change Barn 40 Yds distance and inherent shielding North East Of between the project and this Farmhouse heritage asset. 49 Newhouse Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farm; Barn 30 effects on setting due to the Change Yds South distance and inherent shielding East Of between the project and this Farmhouse heritage asset. 51 High House Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change

Page 186 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 52 The Fish Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible House, Kytes effects on setting due to the Change Lane distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 56 Lower Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Wangfield effects on setting due to the Change Farmhouse distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 58 Elm Tree Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farmhouse effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 59 Barn Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Immediately effects on setting due to the Change East South distance and inherent shielding East Of Elm between the project and this Tree heritage asset. Farmhouse 60 Durley Mill Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farmhouse effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 61 Durley Mill High There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible , Mill House effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding

Page 187 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation between the project and this heritage asset. 62 Tarrytown Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 63 Barn 10 Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Metres East Of effects on setting due to the Change Durley distance and inherent shielding Millhouse between the project and this heritage asset. 65 Ditched Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Enclosure heritage asset is predicted. The Change 275M South value of this heritage asset is Of Durley primarily derived from its physical Manor Farm remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 69 Stakes Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farmhouse effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 71 Site Of Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Ploughed Out heritage asset is predicted. The Change Disc Barrow, value of this heritage asset is West Of Park primarily derived from its physical Farm remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage

Page 188 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 73 Cross Lanes Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farmhouse effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 74 Former Quarry Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 675M North heritage asset is predicted. The Change West Of Peak value of this heritage asset is Cottage primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 75 Dell Cottages Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 76 Ashton House Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 77 Old Farm Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 78 Little Manor Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 189 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 79 Barn 20M Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible South Of effects on setting due to the Change Chapel distance and inherent shielding Farmhouse between the project and this heritage asset. 80 Chapel Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farmhouse effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 81 Complex Medium No physical impacts on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible System Of heritage asset, or on Asset 1141 Change Enclosures which is potentially associated, And Tracks are predicted. The value of this South West Of heritage asset is primarily derived Lomer Farm from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact o 82 Cherry Tree Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 84 Jarmans Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 85 Artefact Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Spread 530M previously removed and cannot Change West Of Cross therefore be impacted further. Lanes Farm

Page 190 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 86 Domestic Site Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 980M West Of previously removed and cannot Change Street End therefore be impacted further. Farm 87 Strete End Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 88 Belmore Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible House effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 90 Bowl Barrow 1 Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and its relationship with other barrows within the vicinity; however any potential noise or visual intrusion would have 93 Findspot, Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Stephen's previously removed and cannot Change Castle Down 1 therefore be impacted further. 98 Barn 50M Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible North East Of effects on setting due to the Change Dean distance and inherent shielding Farmhouse between the project and this heritage asset. 99 Barn 40M Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible North Of Dean effects on setting due to the Change Farmhouse distance and inherent shielding

Page 191 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation between the project and this heritage asset. 100 Stephens Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Castle Down heritage asset is predicted. The Change Barrow value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 101 Dean Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farmhouse effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 102 Granary 10M Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible North Of Dean effects on setting due to the Change Farmhouse distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 110 Preshaw Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible House effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 111 Iron Age Field Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible System, West previously destroyed and cannot Change Of Rabbit therefore be impacted further. Copse 113 West Of Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Rabbit Copse, heritage asset is predicted. The Change Barrow value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical

Page 192 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 114 North Of Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Rabbit Copse, heritage asset is predicted. The Change Barrow value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 115 Rabbit Copse, Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Barrow heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 118 Neolithic Axe, Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Field North Of previously removed and cannot Change Lomer Farm therefore be impacted further. 122 College Down Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farm Cottages effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 124 Round Barrow Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or

Page 193 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 125 Riversdown High There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 128 Stable Block Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 5M South effects on setting due to the Change West Of distance and inherent shielding Malthouse between the project and this Farmhouse heritage asset. 129 Malthouse Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farmhouse effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 130 Old Curates Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible House effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 131 Bramdean Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farmhouse effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 132 Bowl Barrow Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible And previously destroyed and cannot Change Inhumation, therefore be impacted further. Hinton Ampner/1930

Page 194 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 140 Field South Of Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Brockwood previously removed and cannot Change Park therefore be impacted further. 146 Findspot, Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Gravel Pit 1 previously removed and cannot Change Mile East Of therefore be impacted further. Bramdean 148 Brockwood Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Copse heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 149 Brockwood Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Park House effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 150 Wellhouse 2 Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Metres South effects on setting due to the Change Of Bere distance and inherent shielding Farmhouse between the project and this heritage asset. 151 Bere Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farmhouse effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 152 Granary 8 Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Metres South effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding

Page 195 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation Of Bere between the project and this Farmhouse heritage asset. 153 Barn And Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cartshed In effects on setting due to the Change Farmyard distance and inherent shielding 100M East Of between the project and this Brockwood heritage asset. House 154 Barn In Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farmyard effects on setting due to the Change 100M East Of distance and inherent shielding Brockwood between the project and this House heritage asset. 155 Granary In Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farmyard effects on setting due to the Change 100M East Of distance and inherent shielding Brockwood between the project and this House heritage asset. 156 Brockwood Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Lodge effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 158 Barn At Hinton Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Woodlands effects on setting due to the Change Farm, 30M distance and inherent shielding South West Of between the project and this Farmhouse heritage asset. 159 Hinton Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Woodland effects on setting due to the Change Farmhouse distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 196 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 160 Hinton Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Woodland effects on setting due to the Change Cottages distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 161 Pits Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 163 Ring Ditch 1 Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 164 Field System 2 Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 165 Barrow 1 Medium No physical impacts on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset, or on other known Change archaeological remains which form the broader setting of this

Page 197 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation heritage asset, are predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential no 167 Field System 4 Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 168 Chalk Pit 1 Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 169 Boundary Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Ditch heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 170 Barrow 2 Medium No physical impacts on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset, or on other known Change archaeological remains which form the broader setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. The value of this heritage asset is

Page 198 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential no 171 Chalk Pit 3 Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 172 A Complex Of Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Linear And heritage asset is predicted. The Change Irregular value of this heritage asset is Features primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 173 Ring Ditch 2 Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 174 Ring Ditch 3 Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no

Page 199 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 175 Cropmarks Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible East Of heritage asset is predicted. The Change Bramdean value of this heritage asset is Common primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 176 Barrow 3 Medium No physical impacts on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset, or on other known Change archaeological remains which form the broader setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential no 177 Barrow 4 Medium No physical impacts on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset, or on other known Change archaeological remains which form the broader setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential no 178 Pit 1 Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no

Page 200 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 179 Enclosure 2 Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 180 Pit 2 Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 181 Enclosure 3 Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 182 Field System 5 Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no

Page 201 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 183 Barrow 5 Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 184 Enclosure 4 Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 185 Field System 7 Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 186 Pit 3 Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no

Page 202 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 187 Field System 8 Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 188 Church Of St High There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Mary effects on setting due to the Change Magdalene distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 189 Site Of Low If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Telegraph present, no physical impact on this Change Station heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 190 Field System 9 Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage

Page 203 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 191 Linear Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Features, heritage asset is predicted. The Change Soames Farm value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 192 Lyewood Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 193 Soames Place High There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 194 The Malthouse Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 195 Merryfield Medium If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farm present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa

Page 204 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 196 Roman Or Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Medieval previously removed and cannot Change Pottery therefore be impacted further. Findspot 198 Lyeway Farm Medium If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 199 Undated Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Rectangular heritage asset is predicted. The Change Enclosure value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 201 Enclosure 5 Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 202 Kitwood Farm Medium If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical

Page 205 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 204 Bomb Crater Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 206 Semaphore Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farm And effects on setting due to the Change Boundary distance and inherent shielding Stones between the project and this heritage asset. 208 Quarry Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 209 Cremation Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 210 Flint Axeheads Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 212 Chalk Pit 6 Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is

Page 206 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 213 Pies Farm Medium If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 214 Burnt Flint 1 Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 215 Artefact Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Scatter previously removed and cannot Change Worked Flints therefore be impacted further. 1 216 Upper Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Woodside effects on setting due to the Change Farm Cottage distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 217 Extractive Pit 1 Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage

Page 207 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 218 Upper Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Woodside effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 219 Worked Flint 1 Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 220 Burnt Flint 2 Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 221 Post Medieval Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pottery 1 previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 222 Burnt Flint 3 Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 223 Artefact Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Scatter previously removed and cannot Change Worked Flints therefore be impacted further. 2 224 Artefact Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Scatter previously removed and cannot Change Medieval therefore be impacted further. Pottery 225 Lower Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Woodside effects on setting due to the Change Farmhouse distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 208 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 226 Worked Flint 2 Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 227 Pottery Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 228 Burnt Flint 4 Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 229 Worked Flint 3 Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 230 Worked Flint 4 Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 231 Artefact Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Scatter Burnt previously removed and cannot Change Flint therefore be impacted further. 232 Burnt Flint 5 Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 233 Flint Debitage Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 234 Several Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Sherds Of Iron previously removed and cannot Change Age And therefore be impacted further. Roman Pottery 235 Several Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Sherds Of previously removed and cannot Change Medieval And therefore be impacted further.

Page 209 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation Post Medieval Pottery 236 Bronze Age Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pottery previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 237 Barn At Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Southfield effects on setting due to the Change Farm distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 240 Copelands Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 241 The Forge And Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Little Forge effects on setting due to the Change Cottage distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 242 Street House Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farmhouse effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 243 The Malthouse Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 244 The Old Barn Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change

Page 210 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 246 Chawton Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Glebe And effects on setting due to the Change Rectory Office distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 247 Malthouse Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottages effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 248 Chawton Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Lodge effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 249 Churchyard Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Wall West Of effects on setting due to the Change Church Of St distance and inherent shielding Nicholas between the project and this heritage asset. 250 Lychgate Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible North Of effects on setting due to the Change Church Of St distance and inherent shielding Nicholas between the project and this heritage asset. 251 Headstone To Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Ann Frances effects on setting due to the Change Prowting, distance and inherent shielding South Of between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 211 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation Church Of St Nicholas 252 Headstone To Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Rowland effects on setting due to the Change Prowting, St distance and inherent shielding Nicholas' between the project and this Churchyard, heritage asset. South Of St Nicholas' Church 253 Lychgate Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible South Of effects on setting due to the Change Church Of St distance and inherent shielding Nicholas between the project and this heritage asset. 254 Church Of St. High There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Nicholas effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 255 Monument To Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cassandra effects on setting due to the Change Austin And distance and inherent shielding Cassandra between the project and this Elizabeth heritage asset. Austin, South Of Church Of St Nicholas 256 Orchard Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 212 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 257 Pond Cottages Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 258 The Manor High There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible House effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 259 Store 10M To Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible North Of The effects on setting due to the Change Manor House distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 260 Bakehouse Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible And Stables effects on setting due to the Change 20M North Of distance and inherent shielding Jane Austen's between the project and this House heritage asset. 261 Jane Austen's High There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible House effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 262 Clinkers Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 263 Home Farm Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Barn effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding

Page 213 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation between the project and this heritage asset. 264 Ivy Cottage 2 Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 265 Content, Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Stencott, the effects on setting due to the Change Cottage, And distance and inherent shielding The Village between the project and this heritage asset. 266 Chawton High There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible House effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 267 Home Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farmhouse effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 268 Springfield, Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible nos. 1 And 2 effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 269 Elm Cottage Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 214 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 270 Vincents Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 271 The Dower Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible House effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 272 Denmead Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 274 Alphonsus Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible House effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 275 Jordans Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 276 Barn 100M Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible South West Of effects on setting due to the Change Manor House distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 277 Holly Cottage Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding

Page 215 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation between the project and this heritage asset. 278 Tylers Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 279 Granary 50M Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible South Of effects on setting due to the Change Manor House distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 280 Cruck Cottage High There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 281 Manor House High There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farmhouse effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 282 Angerton Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 283 Cartshed 60M Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible South Of effects on setting due to the Change Manor House distance and inherent shielding Farmhouse between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 216 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 284 Church Green Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 285 Farringdon Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Church Of effects on setting due to the Change England distance and inherent shielding Primary between the project and this School And heritage asset. Village Hall 286 Table Tomb Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 2M South Of effects on setting due to the Change The Church distance and inherent shielding Tower between the project and this heritage asset. 287 Thatched Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 288 Table Tomb Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 4M South Of effects on setting due to the Change The Church distance and inherent shielding Tower between the project and this heritage asset. 289 Church Of All High There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Saints effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 290 Berry Cottage Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change

Page 217 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 291 Churchyard Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cross 10M effects on setting due to the Change South Of The distance and inherent shielding Church between the project and this heritage asset. 292 Prehistoric Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Flint Scatter, previously removed and cannot Change East Of therefore be impacted further. Broadlands Row 293 The Haunt, Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible And Gilbert's effects on setting due to the Change Cottage distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 294 Undated Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Earthworks, heritage asset is predicted. The Change Broadlands value of this heritage asset is Row primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 295 Hardings Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 296 Old Timbers Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change

Page 218 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 297 Beloms Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 298 Beloms Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 299 Field System Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 14 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 300 Undated Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Linear Feature heritage asset is predicted. The Change North West Of value of this heritage asset is Peak Copse primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 301 Enclosure 7 Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical

Page 219 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 302 Medieval Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pottery 1 previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 303 Burnt Flint 9 Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 304 Worked Flint 6 Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 305 Roman Pottery Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 2 previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 306 Post Medieval Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pottery 3 previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 307 Iron Age Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pottery 1 previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 309 Romano- Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible British previously destroyed and cannot Change Rubbish Pit therefore be impacted further. 310 Roman Pottery Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible And Flint previously removed and cannot Change Flakes therefore be impacted further. 311 Fieldwalking Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Survey South previously removed and cannot Change Of therefore be impacted further.

Page 220 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation Truncheaunts Farm House 312 Possible Site Medium If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Of Manor present, no physical impact on this Change House, heritage asset is predicted. The truncheaunts value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 315 Kiln House Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 324 Upper Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Neatham Mill effects on setting due to the Change House distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 325 Earthworks Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 326 Mapey's Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 221 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 327 Modern Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pottery previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 328 Struck Flint 6 Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 329 Cuckoo's High No physical impacts on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Corner Roman heritage asset, or on the Change Site, Neatham associated archaeological remains of Asset 337 which form the immediate setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. There is the potential for physical impacts to the broader extent of Roman archaeo 330 Dovecote 20M Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible West Of Lower effects on setting due to the Change Neatham Mill distance and inherent shielding And Neatham between the project and this Grange heritage asset. 331 Artefact Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Scatter previously removed and cannot Change Worked Flints therefore be impacted further. 3 332 Artefact Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Scatter Post previously removed and cannot Change Medieval therefore be impacted further. Pottery 333 Burnt Flint 13 Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further.

Page 222 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 334 Barn 10M Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible West Of Lower effects on setting due to the Change Neatham Mill distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 335 Lower Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Neatham Mill effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 336 Neatham Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Grange effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 337 Cuckoo's High No physical impacts on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Corner Roman heritage asset, or on the Change Settlement, associated archaeological remains Neatham of Asset 329 which form the immediate setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. There is the potential for physical impacts to the broader extent of Roman archaeo 338 Dovecote 50M Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible South Of effects on setting due to the Change Neatham distance and inherent shielding Manor House between the project and this heritage asset. 340 Artefact Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Scatter previously removed and cannot Change Worked Flints therefore be impacted further. 4

Page 223 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 341 Burnt Flint 14 Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 342 Bonham's High There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farm House effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 343 BonhThe AMS Medium If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farm present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 344 Bonham's Medium The setting of this heritage asset n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Milestone is already largely defined by Change current visual and noise intrusion from the A31 which is directly adjacent to the heritage asset. The construction of the project will have no change to the nature of this setting. 345 Linear And Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Curvilinear heritage asset is predicted. The Change Cropmark value of this heritage asset is Features primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage

Page 224 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 346 Clay's Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farmhouse effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 348 'Roman Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Remains' previously destroyed and cannot Change Found In An therefore be impacted further. Old Gravel Pit 349 Undated Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Linear heritage asset is predicted. The Change Features value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 350 Roman Pottery Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible And Tile previously removed and cannot Change Findspot therefore be impacted further. 351 Neolithic Flint Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 352 Thatched Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 353 West End Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 225 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 355 Barn 50M Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible South West Of effects on setting due to the Change Manor Cottage distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 356 The Barracks Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 357 Home Farm Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottages effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 358 Site Of Pond 1 Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously destroyed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 359 Manor Cottage Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 360 Gothic Cottage Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 361 Froyle House Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 226 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 362 Site Of Pond 2 Negligible If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 363 Site Of Pond 3 Negligible If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 367 Froyle Cottage Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 375 Barn 20M Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible West Of Froyle effects on setting due to the Change Place distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 376 Findspot Of Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Roman previously removed and cannot Change Pottery, Lord therefore be impacted further. Mayor Treloar Hospital 379 Fulling Mill Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change

Page 227 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 385 Table Top Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Tomb 12M effects on setting due to the Change North Of The distance and inherent shielding Church Of St between the project and this Mary 1 heritage asset. 386 Table Top Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Tomb 18M effects on setting due to the Change North Of The distance and inherent shielding Church Of St between the project and this Mary 1 heritage asset. 387 Table Top Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Tomb 12M effects on setting due to the Change North Of The distance and inherent shielding Church Of St between the project and this Mary 2 heritage asset. 388 Table Top Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Tomb 18M effects on setting due to the Change North Of The distance and inherent shielding Church Of St between the project and this Mary 2 heritage asset. 389 Table Top Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Tomb 7M effects on setting due to the Change North Of The distance and inherent shielding Church Of St between the project and this Mary heritage asset. 392 Table Top Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Tomb 5M effects on setting due to the Change North Of The distance and inherent shielding Church Of St between the project and this Mary heritage asset.

Page 228 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 395 Medieval Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cross Base heritage asset is predicted. There Change are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 396 Table Top Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Tomb 11M effects on setting due to the Change North Of The distance and inherent shielding Church Of St between the project and this Mary heritage asset. 399 Table Top Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Tomb 2M effects on setting due to the Change North Of The distance and inherent shielding Church Of St between the project and this Mary heritage asset. 402 Table Top Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Tomb 18M effects on setting due to the Change North Of The distance and inherent shielding Church Of St between the project and this Mary 3 heritage asset. 405 Table Top Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Tomb 1M effects on setting due to the Change South Of The distance and inherent shielding Church Of St between the project and this Mary 1 heritage asset. 406 Table Top Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Tomb 1M effects on setting due to the Change South Of The distance and inherent shielding Church Of St between the project and this Mary 2 heritage asset. 409 Table Top Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Tomb 10M effects on setting due to the Change

Page 229 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation South Of The distance and inherent shielding Church Of St between the project and this Mary heritage asset. 410 Granary 25M Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible South Of St effects on setting due to the Change Pauls House distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 411 St Paul's Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible House effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 413 Lodge Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 416 Post Office Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible , Post Office effects on setting due to the Change Cottage distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 417 Barn At Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Bunden's effects on setting due to the Change Farm, 60M distance and inherent shielding North West Of between the project and this Blunden's heritage asset. House 418 Fern Cottage Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding

Page 230 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation between the project and this heritage asset. 419 Barn At Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Blunden's effects on setting due to the Change Farm, 40M distance and inherent shielding West Of between the project and this Blunden's heritage asset. House 420 Blunden's Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farm effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 421 Blunden's Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible House effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 422 Mill Court Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 423 Service Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Building 10M effects on setting due to the Change East Of Mill distance and inherent shielding Court between the project and this heritage asset. 424 Stable/Granar Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible y 20M East Of effects on setting due to the Change Mill Court distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 231 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 425 Garden Wall Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible East At Mill effects on setting due to the Change Court distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 426 Coach House Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 20M East Of effects on setting due to the Change Mill Court distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 427 Barn 30M Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible South Of Mill effects on setting due to the Change Court distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 428 Coombefield Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 429 Shrubbery Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage effects on setting due to the Change , the inherent shielding from vegetation Shrubbery bordering the A31, which House separates the heritage asset from the project. 430 Milestone Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 140M East Of effects on setting due to the Change Shrubbery inherent shielding from vegetation House bordering the A31, which separates the heritage asset from the project.

Page 232 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 431 (West Side) Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Upper Froyle effects on setting due to the Change War Memorial distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 432 Ewelme Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 433 Brecklands Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 436 Golden Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 437 Holmwood Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottages effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 438 Stables 50M Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible North West Of effects on setting due to the Change Silvester's distance and inherent shielding Farmhouse between the project and this heritage asset. 439 Barn 10M Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible West Of effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding

Page 233 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation Silvester's between the project and this Farmhouse heritage asset. 440 Granary 5M Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible South Of effects on setting due to the Change Silvester's distance and inherent shielding Farmhouse between the project and this heritage asset. 441 Silvester's High There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farmhouse effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 442 Bridge House Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 443 Appletree Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage, Pond effects on setting due to the Change Cottage distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 444 Granary 15M Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible West Of effects on setting due to the Change Husseys distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 445 Barn 20M Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible South West Of effects on setting due to the Change Husseys distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 234 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 446 Old Brewery Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible House effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 447 Brewery Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 448 Highway Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottages effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 449 Husseys High There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 450 Husseys Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farmhouse effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 451 Service Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Building 10M effects on setting due to the Change East Of distance and inherent shielding Husseys between the project and this heritage asset. 452 Wall And Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Small Gazebo effects on setting due to the Change To The East distance and inherent shielding

Page 235 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation Of Husseys between the project and this And Oast heritage asset. House 453 The Cottage Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 454 Limit Cottages Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 455 Brocas Farm Medium If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 459 Milestone Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 120M East Of effects on setting due to the Change Junction With distance and inherent shielding Isington Lane between the project and this heritage asset. 461 Earthwork At High No physical impacts on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Penley heritage asset, or on known Change archaeological remains shown on aerial photographs which form the setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. There are no impact

Page 236 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent s 462 Cremation Low This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cemetery previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 463 Crocks Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farmhouse effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 464 Crocks Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottages effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 465 Crocks Farm Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottages effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 466 Site Of Roman Medium If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Villa, Glade present, no physical impact on this Change Farm heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 467 Ash Cottage Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 237 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 469 Montgomery's Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farm Barn effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 475 Jenkyn Place Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 476 Barn At Bury Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Court Farm effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 477 Linear Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Features, heritage asset is predicted. The Change Glade Farm value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 478 Boundary Wall Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible East Of effects on setting due to the Change Jenkyn Place distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 479 Table Tomb Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 10M South Of effects on setting due to the Change St Mary's distance and inherent shielding Church (Nave) between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 238 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 480 Table Tomb Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 12M South Of effects on setting due to the Change St Mary's distance and inherent shielding Church (Nave) between the project and this heritage asset. 481 Table Tomb Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 6M South Of effects on setting due to the Change St Mary's distance and inherent shielding Church (Nave) between the project and this heritage asset. 482 Table Tomb Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 7M South Of effects on setting due to the Change St Mary's distance and inherent shielding Church (Nave) between the project and this heritage asset. 483 Church Of St High There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Mary effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 484 Table Tomb Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 15M South Of effects on setting due to the Change St Mary's distance and inherent shielding Church (Nave) between the project and this heritage asset. 485 Table Tomb Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 5M South Of effects on setting due to the Change St Mary's distance and inherent shielding Church between the project and this (Chancel) heritage asset. 486 Table Tomb Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 15M South Of effects on setting due to the Change St Mary's distance and inherent shielding

Page 239 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation Church between the project and this (Chancel) 1 heritage asset. 487 Table Tomb Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 12M South Of effects on setting due to the Change St Mary's distance and inherent shielding Church between the project and this (Chancel) heritage asset. 488 Table Tomb Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 15M South Of effects on setting due to the Change St Mary's distance and inherent shielding Church between the project and this (Chancel) 2 heritage asset. 489 Table Tomb Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 9M South Of effects on setting due to the Change St Mary's distance and inherent shielding Church between the project and this (Chancel) heritage asset. 490 Table Tomb Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 17M South Of effects on setting due to the Change St Mary's distance and inherent shielding Church between the project and this (Chancel) heritage asset. 491 Table Tomb Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 14M South Of effects on setting due to the Change St Mary's distance and inherent shielding Church between the project and this (Chancel) heritage asset. 492 Table Tomb Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 19M South Of effects on setting due to the Change St Mary's distance and inherent shielding Church between the project and this (Chancel) heritage asset.

Page 240 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 493 Table Tomb Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 21M South Of effects on setting due to the Change St Mary's distance and inherent shielding Church between the project and this (Chancel) heritage asset. 494 Verneys Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 497 Linear Feature Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 2 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 498 Hook Cottage Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 499 The Briary Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 500 Pilgrims Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 241 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 501 Potters Hatch Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible House effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 502 HannThe AMS Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farm Barn effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 503 Kings Head Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible House effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 504 Dovas Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottages, effects on setting due to the Change Popplewyte, distance and inherent shielding Warey's between the project and this heritage asset. 505 Old Meeting Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible House effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 506 Bathurst Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible House effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 507 Chapel Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding

Page 242 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation between the project and this heritage asset. 508 The Brambles Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 509 26, 28 And 30, Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible the Borough effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 510 Church Court, Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Middle Court, effects on setting due to the Change north Court, distance and inherent shielding South Court, between the project and this the Court, heritage asset. West Court 511 Giffard House Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 512 Bathurst Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 513 The Plume Of Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Featheres effects on setting due to the Change Public House distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 243 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 514 The Old Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Vicarage effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 515 Former Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Congregationa effects on setting due to the Change l Chapel distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 516 Church Of All High There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Saints effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 517 17, 19 And 21, Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible the Borough effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 518 The Old Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible House effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 519 Holly Cottage Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 520 11 And 15 The Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Borough effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding

Page 244 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation between the project and this heritage asset. 521 The Dormers Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 522 Post Office Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 523 Roman Villa Medium If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible North Of present, no physical impact on this Change Barley Pound heritage asset is predicted. The Farm value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 524 10, the Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Borough effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 525 8, the Borough Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 526 6, the Borough Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding

Page 245 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation between the project and this heritage asset. 527 2, the Borough Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 528 The Cedars Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 529 The Old Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Parsonage effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 530 Garden Wall Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible To The Cedars effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 531 Amberley Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible House effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 532 1 And 2 Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pankridge effects on setting due to the Change Street distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 246 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 533 Robinsons Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage , effects on setting due to the Change Stendens distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 534 Garett's Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farmhouse effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 535 Dean's Court, Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible the Deans effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 536 Hart Cottage Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 537 Laun Cottage Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 538 The Limes Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 539 Artefact Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Scatter Roman previously removed and cannot Change Pottery therefore be impacted further.

Page 247 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 540 Roman Coin Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Findspot previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 541 Dean Cottage Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 542 Glebe Cottage Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 543 Yew Tree Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 544 Chilloway Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage, Lea effects on setting due to the Change Cottage, Well distance and inherent shielding Cottage between the project and this heritage asset. 545 Green's Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farmhouse effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 546 Barley Pound High No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Earthworks heritage asset is predicted. There Change are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and

Page 248 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 547 The Oast Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 548 Old Cottage Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 549 Meadow Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 550 The Meade Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 551 The Close Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 552 Greensleeves Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 249 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 553 Limetrees Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 554 Chilloway Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 555 Vine Cottage Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 556 Varndells Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 557 The Vicarage Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 558 Thorns Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 559 Chaundlers Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farmhouse effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding

Page 250 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation between the project and this heritage asset. 560 Gables Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 561 Rambler Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 562 Manor House Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 563 Whitebridge Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 564 Eastbridge Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible House effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 565 The Malt Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible House effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 251 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 568 Byrons Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 575 Doules Mead Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 576 Mesolithic Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Tranchet Axe previously removed and cannot Change Findspot therefore be impacted further. 577 Powderham High No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Castle heritage asset is predicted. There Change are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 578 Type 24 Low No physical impacts on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pillbox 2 heritage asset, or on known Change archaeological remains which form the setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. There are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project 579 Dares Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farmhouse effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 252 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 581 Clare Park Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 583 Site Of Low If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Crondall present, no physical impact on this Change Pottery, Heath heritage asset is predicted. The Lane value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 589 Part Of WWII Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Barbed Wire previously removed and cannot Change Fence Line, N therefore be impacted further. Of Riddings Copse 6 590 Stiller's Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farmhouse effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 592 Barn To South Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Of Stillers effects on setting due to the Change Farmhouse distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 593 Site Of Ewshot Low If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Brick Yard, present, no physical impact on this Change Eshot Wood heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical

Page 253 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 594 WWII Pillbox, Low No physical impacts on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible South West heritage asset, or on known Change Edge Of archaeological remains which Riddings form the setting of this heritage Copse asset, are predicted. There are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project 596 Part Of WWII Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Barbed Wire previously removed and cannot Change Fence Line, therefore be impacted further. West Of Ewshot 1 599 Combe Wood Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 600 WWII Pillbox, Low No physical impacts on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible South East heritage asset, or on known Change Edge Of archaeological remains which Riddings form the setting of this heritage Copse asset, are predicted. There are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project 602 WWII Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Defensive heritage asset is predicted. The Change

Page 254 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation Earthwork, value of this heritage asset is South East Of primarily derived from its physical Riddings remains and any potential noise or Copse 1 visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 603 WWII Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Defensive heritage asset is predicted. The Change Earthwork, value of this heritage asset is South East Of primarily derived from its physical Riddings remains and any potential noise or Copse 2 visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 604 WWII Gun Low No physical impacts on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Emplacement, heritage asset, or on known Change South East Of archaeological remains which Riddings form the setting of this heritage Copse 1 asset, are predicted. There are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project 605 WWII Pillbox, Low No physical impacts on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible north East heritage asset, or on known Change Edge Of archaeological remains which Riddings form the setting of this heritage Copse 2 asset, are predicted. There are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project

Page 255 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 606 WWII Gun Low No physical impacts on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Emplacement, heritage asset, or on known Change South East Of archaeological remains which Riddings form the setting of this heritage Copse 2 asset, are predicted. There are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project 607 Part Of WWII Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Barbed Wire previously removed and cannot Change Fence Line, N therefore be impacted further. Of Riddings Copse 7 608 Part Of WWII Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Barbed Wire previously removed and cannot Change Fence Line, N therefore be impacted further. Of Riddings Copse 8 609 Part Of WWII Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Barbed Wire previously removed and cannot Change Fence Line, N therefore be impacted further. Of Riddings Copse 9 610 Part Of WWII Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Barbed Wire previously removed and cannot Change Fence Line, N therefore be impacted further. Of Riddings Copse 10 611 Type 24 Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pillbox 10 previously destroyed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further.

Page 256 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 612 Type 24 Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pillbox 11 previously destroyed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 613 Type 24 Low No physical impacts on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pillbox 12 heritage asset, or on known Change archaeological remains which form the setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. There are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project 615 Part Of WWII Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Barbed Wire previously removed and cannot Change Fence Line, therefore be impacted further. West Of Ewshot 2 618 WWII Pillbox, Low No physical impacts on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible South Of heritage asset, or on known Change Dares Lane, archaeological remains which Ewshot 3 form the setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. There are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project 622 Part Of WWII Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Barbed Wire previously removed and cannot Change Fence Line, therefore be impacted further. West Of Ewshot 3

Page 257 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 623 Part Of WWII Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Barbed Wire previously removed and cannot Change Fence Line, therefore be impacted further. West Of Ewshot 4 624 Part Of WWII Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Barbed Wire previously removed and cannot Change Fence Line, therefore be impacted further. West Of Ewshot 5 625 Part Of WWII Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Barbed Wire previously removed and cannot Change Fence Line, therefore be impacted further. West Of Ewshot 6 627 Part Of WWII Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Barbed Wire previously removed and cannot Change Fence Line, therefore be impacted further. West Of Ewshot 7 632 Part Of WWII Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Barbed Wire previously removed and cannot Change Fence Line, therefore be impacted further. West Of Ewshot 8 645 Boundary Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Mound South heritage asset is predicted. The Change Of Norris Hill value of this heritage asset is West primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage

Page 258 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 649 Boundary Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Mound North heritage asset is predicted. The Change Of Norris Hill value of this heritage asset is East primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 653 Possible Medium If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Deserted present, no physical impact on this Change Medieval heritage asset is predicted. The Settlement, value of this heritage asset is Southwood primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 657 West Heath Low If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pottery present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 658 Possible Kiln Low If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Site present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa

Page 259 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 659 Several Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Sherds Of previously destroyed and cannot Change Medieval therefore be impacted further. Pottery 662 17th Century Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pottery previously destroyed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 663 The Old Court Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible House previously destroyed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 664 The Old Court Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible House heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 665 Church Of St Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Christopher effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 667 Pillbox 3 Low This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously destroyed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 668 17th Century Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Of Pottery previously removed and cannot Change Dump therefore be impacted further. 670 Thatched Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage Public effects on setting due to the Change House

Page 260 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 671 Site Of Low If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farnborough present, no physical impact on this Change Workhouse heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 672 Farnborough Negligible This heritage asset is now n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Grange overbuilt by residential properties Change and the Sixth Form College Farnborough. As it is situated exterior to the Order Limits, there will be no physical impact upon to the readability of this heritage asset's former boundaries whic 677 Possible Site Low If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Of A Windmill present, no physical impact on this Change North Of heritage asset is predicted. The Farnborough value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 679 Monastic Medium The grounds of this historic n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Buildings To building (HLT92) are bounded to Change Abbey Church the north by a railway line, to the Of St Michael west by the A325, and to the east by a railway line and the A331. This heritage asset therefore

Page 261 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation experiences visual and noise intrusion from the railway and ur 680 Abbey Church High The grounds of this historic n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Of St Michael building (HLT92) are bounded to Change the north by a railway line, to the west by the A325, and to the east by a railway line and the A331. This heritage asset therefore experiences visual and noise intrusion from the railway and ur 681 Church Of St Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Peter effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 685 St Michael's Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Mews effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 686 Farnborough Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Place effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 690 Site Of Three Low If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Buildings present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa

Page 262 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 691 Farnborough Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Hill Pottery previously destroyed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 692 Anglia Building Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Society effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 694 Medieval Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pottery previously destroyed and cannot Change Findspot therefore be impacted further. 696 Late Medieval Low This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pottery Kiln previously destroyed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 697 Medieval Or Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Post Medieval previously destroyed and cannot Change Kiln Waster therefore be impacted further. Dump 1 700 19th Century Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Kiln 1 previously destroyed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 701 Medieval Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pottery, previously destroyed and cannot Change Empress therefore be impacted further. Cottage 706 Medieval Or Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Post Medieval previously destroyed and cannot Change Kiln Waster therefore be impacted further. Dump 2 717 The White Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Hart Public effects on setting due to the Change House distance and inherent shielding

Page 263 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation between the project and this heritage asset. 718 Pottery Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Wasters, Ship previously removed and cannot Change Lane therefore be impacted further. 726 The Old Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Rectory effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 728 The Grove Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 739 Church Of St Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Peter effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 741 Bowling Green Medium If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farm, Frimley present, no physical impact on this Change (Site Of) heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 742 Moor Farm, Medium If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Frimley present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical

Page 264 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 746 Whitewells Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farmhouse effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 748 Cross Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farmhouse effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 750 Cross Cottage Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 754 The Barn Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 755 Bedfords Farm Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible House effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 757 Possible Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Barrow heritage asset is predicted. There Change are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and

Page 265 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 761 Kiln Plat And Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Field, Frimley previously destroyed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 765 Prisoner Of Low If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible War Camp, present, no physical impact on this Change Frith Hill heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 767 Garrison Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Church Of St effects on setting due to the Change Barbara distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 768 Anti Tank Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Block previously destroyed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 773 Two Standing Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Stone Circles heritage asset is predicted. The Change setting of these heritage assets is no longer relevant to their historical interest and does not contribute to their value. 775 Cylinder Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously destroyed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further.

Page 266 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 776 Pillbox (Type Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible FW3/24) 1 previously destroyed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 777 Royal Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Observer previously destroyed and cannot Change Corps therefore be impacted further. Monitoring Post 779 Pillbox (Type Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible FW3/24) 2 previously destroyed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 780 Possible Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Droving Trails: heritage asset is predicted. The Change Chobham value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 781 Military Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Fieldworks/ heritage asset is predicted. The Change Enclosures, value of this heritage asset is Westend primarily derived from its physical Common remains and any potential noise or Central visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 782 Cultivation Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Marks, heritage asset is predicted. The Change Westend value of this heritage asset is Common primarily derived from its physical Central remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no

Page 267 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 783 Pleasant Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 784 Ditch Feature, Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Possible heritage asset is predicted. The Change Medieval value of this heritage asset is Boundary For primarily derived from its physical Nearby Folly, remains and any potential noise or Pirbright visual intrusion would have no Ranges impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 787 Lightwater Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pond, Pond heritage asset is predicted. There Change Bay are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 788 Lee Lane Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farmhouse effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 789 Rectory Farm Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible House effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 268 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 790 Barn 20 Yds Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Of Rectory effects on setting due to the Change Farm House distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 792 Four Bowl High No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Barrows On heritage asset is predicted. The Change West End relationship with nearby bowl Common barrow Asset 793 will not be interrupted. There are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this 793 Bowl Barrow High No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible At New heritage asset is predicted. The Change England, West relationship with nearby bowl End Common barrow Asset 792 will not be interrupted. There are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this 795 Rose Cottage Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 797 Brooklands Medium If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farm present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical

Page 269 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 799 Hook Mill (Site Low If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Of) present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 800 Hook Mill Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Watermill previously destroyed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 801 Old House Low If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Plat present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 802 Brentmoor Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Dene House effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 803 The Simmons Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Memorial effects on setting due to the Change Library distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 270 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 804 Gordon's Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible School Chapel effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 805 Assembly Hall Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible And effects on setting due to the Change Reception, distance and inherent shielding Gordon's between the project and this School heritage asset. 806 Statue Of Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible General effects on setting due to the Change Gordon, distance and inherent shielding Gordon's between the project and this School heritage asset. 808 West End War Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Memorial effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 810 Hookstone Medium If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farm, West present, no physical impact on this Change End, Chobham heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 812 Oval Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Enclosure heritage asset is predicted. The Change Hatch Croft value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or

Page 271 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 815 Pankhurst Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 816 Valley End Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible War Memorial effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 817 Church Of St Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Saviour effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 818 Bourneside Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 819 Penny Cottage Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 820 Wall To Front Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Of Brook effects on setting due to the Change Place distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 272 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 821 Clock Tower Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 350 Yds North effects on setting due to the Change East Of distance and inherent shielding Westcroft Park between the project and this heritage asset. 822 Brook Place High There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 823 The Old Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Vicarage effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 824 Maltmans Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 827 The Cottage Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 831 Shrubbs Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farmhouse effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 834 Barrow (Site Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Of), Chobham heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is

Page 273 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 835 Iron Gate: Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Chobham effects on setting due to the Change Place Woods distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 837 Drystone Ha Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Ha: Chobham effects on setting due to the Change Place Woods distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 838 Buckstone Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farm House effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 841 Home Farm, Medium If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Chobham present, no physical impact on this Change Place heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 844 Woods Farm Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible House effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 274 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 845 Burrow Hill Medium If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farm present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 846 Burrow Hill Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farm House effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 847 The Cloche Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Hat effects on setting due to the Change Restaurant distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 848 Wayside Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 849 Enclosure: Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Clearmount heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 850 Pump At SU Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 97076293 effects on setting due to the Change

Page 275 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 851 Enclosure: Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Portobello heritage asset is predicted. There Change are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 852 Fish Pond Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Site: Marlake previously destroyed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 853 Former Negligible If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Allotment present, no physical impact on this Change Enclosure: heritage asset is predicted. The Jubilee Mount value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 856 Possible Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Quarry Or heritage asset is predicted. The Change Industrial Site: value of this heritage asset is Killy Hill primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 864 Little Heath Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farm House effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 276 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 869 Paradise Farm Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible House effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 871 Westways Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farm House effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 879 Longcross Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Church effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 880 Lychgate With Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Attached effects on setting due to the Change Churchyard distance and inherent shielding Wall, between the project and this Longcross heritage asset. Church 881 Mound: Piper's Negligible No physical impacts on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Green heritage asset are predicted. Change There are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 882 Bowl Barrow High No physical impacts on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 200M West Of heritage asset, or on other bowl Change Barrowhills barrows within the vicinity which forms the broader setting of this heritage asset, are predicted.

Page 277 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation There is currently no intervisibility between these heritage assets. There are no impact pathwa 883 Barrow Hills Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Garden effects on setting due to the Change Terrace distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 884 Barrow Hills Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 890 Linear Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Earthworks: heritage asset is predicted. The Change Piper's Green value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 892 Struck Flint Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Flake, Flutters previously destroyed and cannot Change Hill House, therefore be impacted further. Long Cross 895 Earthwork NW High No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Of Childown heritage asset is predicted. There Change Farm On are no impact pathways for effects Chobham on setting due to the distance and Common inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 899 Sub-Circular Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Feature: heritage asset is predicted. The Change

Page 278 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation Possible value of this heritage asset is Hearth, primarily derived from its physical Longcross remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 902 Possible Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cultivation heritage asset is predicted. The Change Marks, value of this heritage asset is Longcross primarily derived from its physical Road remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 904 Fan Court Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farm effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 907 Possible Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cultivation heritage asset is predicted. The Change Marks, value of this heritage asset is Mushroom primarily derived from its physical Farm remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 908 Possible Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cultivation heritage asset is predicted. The Change Marks, Fan value of this heritage asset is Court primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no

Page 279 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 909 Lynchgate To Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Church Of effects on setting due to the Change Holy Trinity distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 910 Possible Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cultivation heritage asset is predicted. The Change Marks, Fox Hill value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 911 Church Of Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Holy Trinity effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 912 France Farm, Medium If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Chertsey present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 913 Lodge Of Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Botleys Park effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 280 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 914 Possible Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Building, heritage asset is predicted. The Change Botleys Park value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 915 Botleys Park High There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Hospital effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 920 Columbarium Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Tower At effects on setting due to the Change Alm'Ner's distance and inherent shielding (Priory) between the project and this heritage asset. 921 Alm'Ner's Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible (Priory) effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 922 Entrance Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Lodge And effects on setting due to the Change Front Railings distance and inherent shielding At Alm'Ner's between the project and this (Priory) heritage asset. 923 Oval Feature, Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Possibly An heritage asset is predicted. The Change Enclosure, value of this heritage asset is Silverland primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or

Page 281 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 924 Mesolithic Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Implements previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 925 Neolithic Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Implements previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 926 Large Middle Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Bronze Age previously destroyed and cannot Change Urn, St Peters therefore be impacted further. Hospital, Chertsey 927 Possible Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Moated Site, heritage asset is predicted. The Change Hardwick value of this heritage asset is Court Farm primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 930 Arbon Cottage Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 932 Wheelers Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Green effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 282 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 934 Neolithic Axe Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible And Flints, previously removed and cannot Change Chertsey therefore be impacted further. 935 Ring Ditch And Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Trackway heritage asset is predicted. The Change Cropmarks, value of this heritage asset is Chertsey primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 936 Pyrcroft House High There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 938 17th Century Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pottery, previously destroyed and cannot Change Sandgates, therefore be impacted further. Guildford Road, Chertsey 940 Ice House At Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Sandgates effects on setting due to the Change inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 941 Barrsbrook Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farm effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 942 Rectangular Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Enclosure heritage asset is predicted. The Change

Page 283 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation Cropmarks, value of this heritage asset is Chertsey primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 944 Cowley's Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Almshouses effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 945 Chertsey Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Railway effects on setting due to the Change Station distance and inherent shielding Building between the project and this heritage asset. 946 16, Fox Lane Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible North effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 947 14, Fox Lane Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible North effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 948 Clortecnic, no. Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 20 effects on setting due to the Change (Cloretecnic) distance and inherent shielding With Attached between the project and this Wall And heritage asset. Outbuildings

Page 284 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 949 23 And 25 Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Guildford effects on setting due to the Change Street distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 950 George Inn Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 951 43, Guildford Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Street effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 952 56, 58, 60, Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 60A And 60B, effects on setting due to the Change Guildford distance and inherent shielding Street between the project and this heritage asset. 953 Stone Axe, Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Chertsey previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 954 Roman Bronze Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Brooch, previously removed and cannot Change Chertsey therefore be impacted further. 955 Mid Bronze Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Age previously removed and cannot Change Spearhead, therefore be impacted further. Chertsey

Page 285 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 956 63-67, Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Guildford effects on setting due to the Change Street distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 959 90, Guildford Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Street effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 960 56, Eastworth Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Road effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 962 Chertsey High No physical impacts on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Abbey: A heritage asset, or on known Change Benedictine archaeological remains which Monastery On form the setting of this heritage The Banks Of asset, are predicted. There are no Abbey River impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project 963 Enclosure, Low If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cold Harbour present, no physical impact on this Change Field heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa

Page 286 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 964 Neolithic Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Occupation previously destroyed and cannot Change Evidence, therefore be impacted further. Land At Painsfield Allotments, Eastworth Road, Chertsey 965 Middle Bronze Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Age previously destroyed and cannot Change Occupation, therefore be impacted further. Land At Painsfield Allotments, Eastworth Road, Chertsey 966 Iron Age Pit, Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Land At previously destroyed and cannot Change Painsfield therefore be impacted further. Allotments, Eastworth Road, Chertsey 967 68-76, London Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Street effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 968 78 And 80, Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible London Street effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding

Page 287 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation between the project and this heritage asset. 969 82 And 84, Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible London Street effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 970 91, London Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Street effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 971 The Vine Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Public House effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 972 7, Bridge Road Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 973 9, Bridge Road Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 974 Post Medieval Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Ditches And heritage asset is predicted. The Change Gullies: value of this heritage asset is Roakes primarily derived from its physical Avenue, remains and any potential noise or Addlestone visual intrusion would have no

Page 288 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 975 Laurel Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage, the effects on setting due to the Change Ferns distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 976 Home Farm Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 978 34 And 36 Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Bridge Road effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 980 West Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Boundary Wall effects on setting due to the Change Of Little distance and inherent shielding Ravenswell between the project and this And City Post heritage asset. 981 40, Bridge Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Road effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 982 The George Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Inn effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 289 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 983 Little Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Ravenswell effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 984 Romano- Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible British Bronze previously removed and cannot Change Figure, thames therefore be impacted further. At Chertsey 985 Two Mesolithic Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Tranchet Axes previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 986 Old Farm, Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Riverside effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 987 114 And 116 Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Chertsey Road effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 988 Barn At Hatch Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farm effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 989 Sareth Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 290 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 990 Hatch Farm, Medium If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Addlestone present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 991 Hatch Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farmhouse effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 992 Muncaster Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible House effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 993 High Elms Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 994 The Coverts Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 995 Yew Corner Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 291 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 996 Bridge And Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Other effects on setting due to the Change Remains Of distance and inherent shielding Abbey Mills At between the project and this Abbey Chase heritage asset. 997 The Thatched Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 998 Church Of All High There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Saints effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 999 Boundary Wall Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Of Yew Corner effects on setting due to the Change To Staines distance and inherent shielding Road between the project and this heritage asset. 1000 Dial House Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible And No. 1 effects on setting due to the Change (Dial Cottage) distance and inherent shielding And No. 2 Dial between the project and this House heritage asset. Gardens 1001 Kiln Field, Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Hatch Farm, previously destroyed and cannot Change Chertsey therefore be impacted further. 1002 Church Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farmhouse effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding

Page 292 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation between the project and this heritage asset. 1003 The Corner Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible House effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1005 96 And 98 Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Bridge Road effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1006 The Turks Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Head Public effects on setting due to the Change House, distance and inherent shielding Wisteria between the project and this Cottage heritage asset. 1007 Peat Deposits Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Indicating heritage asset is predicted. The Change Prehistoric value of this heritage asset is Cereal primarily derived from its physical Cultivation remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1008 Early Neolithic Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Activity: Mead heritage asset is predicted. The Change Lane, value of this heritage asset is Chertsey primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage

Page 293 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1009 Neolithic And Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Bronze Age previously destroyed and cannot Change Occupation: therefore be impacted further. Manor Farm, Laleham 1010 Ring Ditch Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cropmarks, heritage asset is predicted. The Change Laleham 2 value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1013 Laleham High There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Abbey effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1014 Belsize Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Grange effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1015 Late Bronze Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Age/ Early Iron previously destroyed and cannot Change Age Pottery therefore be impacted further. Sherds 1016 Pottery Dated Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible C. 1230 To previously destroyed and cannot Change 1400 Ad, therefore be impacted further. Bridge Wharf, Chertsey

Page 294 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1017 Victorian River Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Wall, Boat previously destroyed and cannot Change Slipway And therefore be impacted further. Other Post Medieval Features, Including Postholes, Pits And A Ditch 1019 Roman Camp, High The boundaries of this heritage n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Matthew asset have been well defined Change Arnold (Winton, 2009) and there is a School's possible further enclosure Playing Field, delineated to the south; neither of Staines which extend to within the Order Limits. No physical impacts on this heritage asset, or on known arch 1020 Factory And Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Other effects on setting due to the Change Buildings: distance and inherent shielding Chertsey between the project and this Bridge Wharf, heritage asset. Chertsey 1022 20th Century Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Military And previously destroyed and cannot Change Civil Boat therefore be impacted further. Building Structures: Bridge Wharf, Chertsey 1025 Woburn Hill Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding

Page 295 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation between the project and this heritage asset. 1030 19th Century Low This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Industrial previously destroyed and cannot Change Features: therefore be impacted further. Radamec Site, Bridge Wharf, Chertsey 1035 Chertsey High This heritage asset was visited n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Bridge, during Jacobs Cultural Heritage Change Runnymede Survey (03/09/2018) and it was District confirmed that there are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1036 Chertsey High No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Bridge heritage asset is predicted. This Change heritage asset was visited during Jacobs Cultural Heritage Survey (03/09/2018) and it was confirmed that there are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shie 1039 Chertsey High This heritage asset was visited n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Bridge, during Jacobs Cultural Heritage Change Spelthorne Survey (03/09/2018) and it was District confirmed that There are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 296 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1040 City Post 200 Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Yards North Of effects on setting due to the Change Chertsey Lock distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1041 City Post At Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible South End Of effects on setting due to the Change Bridge distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1044 No. 240 Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible (Former effects on setting due to the Change Chertsey Lock distance and inherent shielding House) between the project and this heritage asset. 1045 City Post In Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Front Of No. effects on setting due to the Change 242 Chertsey distance and inherent shielding Bridge Road between the project and this heritage asset. 1047 Human Skull Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Fragment: previously removed and cannot Change Chertsey therefore be impacted further. Meads 1048 Roman Medium If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Tessellated present, no physical impact on this Change Floor: 44 heritage asset is predicted. The Edinburgh value of this heritage asset is Drive, Staines primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa

Page 297 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1050 Possible Burh, Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Bog Ayte, previously destroyed and cannot Change Chertsey therefore be impacted further. 1051 Ashford Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Swimming previously destroyed and cannot Change Pool therefore be impacted further. (Demolished) 1052 Remains Of Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Archway In effects on setting due to the Change Garden To distance and inherent shielding North West Of between the project and this Woburn Park heritage asset. 1054 Milestone Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1055 Roman Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Features, previously destroyed and cannot Change Home Farm, therefore be impacted further. Laleham 1056 Medieval Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Residual previously destroyed and cannot Change Artefacts, therefore be impacted further. Home Farm, Laleham 1059 Railings And Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Gates In effects on setting due to the Change Grounds distance and inherent shielding South West Of between the project and this Woburn Park heritage asset.

Page 298 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1060 Late Neolithic Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Settlement: previously destroyed and cannot Change Land At Home therefore be impacted further. Farm, Laleham 1061 Alcove Or Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Grotto On effects on setting due to the Change Lawn To distance and inherent shielding South Of between the project and this Woburn Park heritage asset. 1062 Woburn Park Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1063 Neolithic Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Occupation previously destroyed and cannot Change Site, South therefore be impacted further. West Of Queen Mary Reservoir 1065 Bronze Age Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Field Systems previously destroyed and cannot Change And Cremation therefore be impacted further. Burials. Home Farm, Laleham 1066 Archway On Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible East Side Of effects on setting due to the Change Main Entrance distance and inherent shielding Drive Of between the project and this Woburn Park heritage asset.

Page 299 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1067 Bronze Age Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Blade previously removed and cannot Change Fragment, therefore be impacted further. Chertsey 1068 Iron Age Knife: Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Littleton Lane previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1069 Neolithic Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Antler previously removed and cannot Change Hammer therefore be impacted further. 1070 Human Skull - Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Undated 2 previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1071 Prehistoric Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Quernstone previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1077 Neolithic Pits: Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Ashford previously destroyed and cannot Change Hospital, Long therefore be impacted further. Lane, Ashford 1085 Clarendon Low The construction of underground n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cinema parking associated with the new Change development would have destroyed any potential archaeological remains associated with the previous Clarendon Cinema. There is no potential for further impact. 1089 Struck Flint, Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Former previously destroyed and cannot Change Stanwell therefore be impacted further.

Page 300 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation Centre, Short Lane, Stanwell 1090 Ring Ditch Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cropmark, heritage asset is predicted. The Change Stanwell value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1091 Stanwell Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farmhouse effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1093 Anglo-Saxon High No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible And Medieval heritage asset is predicted. There Change Cemetery are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1094 Roman Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Catholic effects on setting due to the Change Church Of St distance and inherent shielding Michael, between the project and this Including heritage asset. Boundary Wall And Entrance Screen 1095 Bridge Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding

Page 301 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation between the project and this heritage asset. 1097 Ashford War Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Memorial effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1099 Romano- Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible British Field previously destroyed and cannot Change System: therefore be impacted further. Homers Farm, London Road, Bedfont 1100 Palaeolithic Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Remains, heritage asset is predicted. The Change Mayfield Farm value of this heritage asset is Constructed primarily derived from its physical Wetland remains and any potential noise or Project visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1101 Bronze Age Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Features, previously destroyed and cannot Change Mayfield Farm therefore be impacted further. Constructed Wetland Project 1103 Post-Medieval Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Remains, previously destroyed and cannot Change Mayfield Farm therefore be impacted further. Constructed Wetland Project

Page 302 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1104 Parish Church Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Of St Matthew effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1109 Enclosure In High No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Preshaw heritage asset is predicted. This Change Wood site was visited during Jacobs Cultural Heritage Walkover Survey (05/09/2018) and it was confirmed that there are no impact pathways for effects on setting for effects on setting due to the dist 1110 Enclosure Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 325M North- heritage asset is predicted. The Change East Of Lomer value of this heritage asset is Cottage primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1111 Botley/Winche Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible ster Road heritage asset is predicted. There Change are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1113 Botley Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. There Change are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 303 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1116 Post Medieval Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Quarry 1 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1117 Water Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Meadows heritage asset is predicted. There Change West Of are no impact pathways for effects Wangfield on setting due to the distance and Copse, inherent shielding between the Curdridge project and this heritage asset. 1118 Disused Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Quarries At heritage asset is predicted. The Change Frogmill Farm value of this heritage asset is And Long primarily derived from its physical Acres Farm, remains and any potential noise or Curdridge visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1119 Drainage Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible System 310M heritage asset is predicted. There Change South-East Of are no impact pathways for effects Stapleford on setting due to the distance and Farm, Durley inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1120 Old Forge Negligible There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible House, effects on setting due to the Change Heathen distance and inherent shielding Street between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 304 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1121 Building Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Survey, Old effects on setting due to the Change Forge Cottage distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1122 Rose Cottage, Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Heathen effects on setting due to the Change Street distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1123 The Farmers Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Home, effects on setting due to the Change Heathen distance and inherent shielding Street between the project and this heritage asset. 1124 Saw Mills Negligible If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1126 Linear Ditches Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible North-East Of heritage asset is predicted. The Change Tangier Farm, value of this heritage asset is Bishops primarily derived from its physical Waltham remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1127 Linear Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Features, heritage asset is predicted. The Change

Page 305 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation South Of value of this heritage asset is Cross Lanes primarily derived from its physical Farm remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1128 Possible DMV, Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible South Of heritage asset is predicted. The Change Cross Lanes value of this heritage asset is Farm primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1129 Hamlet Of Medium If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Ashton present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1130 Wool Street Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farmhouse effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1132 Upham Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. There Change are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 306 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1133 Findspot, Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Stephen's previously removed and cannot Change Castle Down 2 therefore be impacted further. 1134 Charcoal Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Burners Site, heritage asset is predicted. There Change Sargeant's are no impact pathways for effects Copse on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1137 Field System Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible And Boundary heritage asset is predicted. While Change Bank At New machinery may be visible and/or Park, Preshaw audible from this location during construction, it would not be a noticeable change from the current agricultural setting and would not impact upon our understan 1138 Circular negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Enclosure, heritage asset is predicted. The Change Lomer value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1139 Preshaw Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. There Change are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 307 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1142 Prehistoric Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Field System heritage asset is predicted. The Change South East Of value of this heritage asset is Wind Farm primarily derived from its physical And East Of remains and any potential noise or Preshaw visual intrusion would have no House, impact on our understanding and Preshaw appreciation of this heritage 1145 Field SE Of Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Rooksgrove heritage asset is predicted. The Change Farm value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1146 Ring Ditch Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 350M West Of heritage asset is predicted. The Change Lomer value of this heritage asset is Cottages primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1147 Field E Of Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Rooksgrove heritage asset is predicted. The Change Farm value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage

Page 308 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1148 Findspot, Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Riversdown, S previously removed and cannot Change Of The Old therefore be impacted further. Stables 1154 Pottery Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Findspot, previously removed and cannot Change Brockwood therefore be impacted further. Park, Southeren Slope, Field South Of Joan's Acre 1160 A272, Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Bramdean previously destroyed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1161 Dairy 25 Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Metres West effects on setting due to the Change North West Of distance and inherent shielding Malthouse between the project and this Farmhouse heritage asset. 1162 Barn 20 Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Metres West effects on setting due to the Change Of Malthouse distance and inherent shielding Farmhouse between the project and this heritage asset. 1163 Tanners Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1164 7 Tomb Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Chests In effects on setting due to the Change Churchyard Of distance and inherent shielding

Page 309 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation St Simon And between the project and this St Jude heritage asset. Church N Of Nave And Chancel S Of Chancel S Of Church 1166 Porch Cottage Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1167 Church Of St High There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Simon And St effects on setting due to the Change Jude distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1168 Manor House Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1169 The Fox Inn Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1170 Gomms Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 310 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1171 Bramdean Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1172 The Old Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1173 Manchester Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1174 The Old Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Rectory effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1175 Little Dean Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1176 April Cottage Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1177 Old Post Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Office effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding

Page 311 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation between the project and this heritage asset. 1179 Fir Tree Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1180 Woodland Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Gate, effects on setting due to the Change Woodlands distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1181 Wolfhanger Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage, effects on setting due to the Change Woodlands distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1182 Irregular Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Enclosures heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1183 Chalk Pit 4 Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage

Page 312 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1184 Chalk Pit 5 Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1185 Field System 1 Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1186 Enclosure 1 Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1187 Trackway 2 Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage

Page 313 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1188 Chalk Pit 2 Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1189 Field System 6 Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1190 Undated Semi- Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Circular heritage asset is predicted. The Change Feature value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1191 Third Brass Of Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Constantine I previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1192 Bronze Ring Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1193 Gold Twisted Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Metalwork previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further.

Page 314 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1194 Field System Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 10 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1195 Barn At The Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Malthouse effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1196 Rectangular Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Enclosure heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1197 Bank Low If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1198 Field System Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 11 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical

Page 315 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1199 Chalk Pit 7 Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1200 Enclosure 6 Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1201 Ivy Cottage Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1202 Extractive Pits Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage

Page 316 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1203 Linear Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Features 1 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1204 Extractive Pit 2 Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1205 Halls Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farmhouse effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1206 Field System Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 13 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1207 Bunkers Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding

Page 317 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation between the project and this heritage asset. 1208 Hawthorn Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1209 Farringdon Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. There Change are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1210 Thatchers Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Nook effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1211 West Cross Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1212 Worked Flint 5 Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1213 Burnt Flint 6 Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1214 Roman Pottery Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 1 previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further.

Page 318 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1215 Post Medieval Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible And Modern previously removed and cannot Change Pottery 1 therefore be impacted further. 1216 Farringdon Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. There Change are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1217 Post Medieval Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pottery 2 previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1218 Burnt Flint 8 Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1219 Struck Flint 1 Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1220 Post Medieval Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible And Modern previously removed and cannot Change Pottery 2 therefore be impacted further. 1221 Flaked Flint Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1222 Burnt Flint 7 Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1223 Bank & Ditch Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Near Chawton heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or

Page 319 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1224 Bronze Age Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Beaker, Gravel previously removed and cannot Change Pit Lower therefore be impacted further. Faringdon 1225 Field System Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 12 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1226 Bank & Ditch Low No physical impacts on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible By Farrington heritage asset, or to potentially Change Deer Park associated heritage assets, are predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on ou 1227 Possible Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Gravel Pit, heritage asset is predicted. The Change Carter's Leas value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1228 Church Of St Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Nicholas effects on setting due to the Change

Page 320 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1229 Manor Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farmhouse 1 effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1230 Possible Site Low If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Of Windmill, S present, no physical impact on this Change Of Adela heritage asset is predicted. The Copse value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1231 Medieval Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pottery 4 previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1232 Post Medieval Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pottery 5 previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1233 Struck Flint 4 Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1234 Iron Age Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pottery 2 previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1235 Struck Flint 5 Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further.

Page 321 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1236 Post Medieval Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible And Modern previously removed and cannot Change Pottery 3 therefore be impacted further. 1237 Burnt Flint 12 Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1238 Chawton Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. There Change are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1239 Cropmark Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Features heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1240 Neolithic Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Polished previously removed and cannot Change Stone therefore be impacted further. Axehead 1241 Sandels Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottages effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1242 The Old Forge Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding

Page 322 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation between the project and this heritage asset. 1243 Old House Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farmhouse effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1244 Linear Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Features 2 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1246 Struck Flint 2 Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1247 Post Medieval Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pottery 4 previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1248 Burnt Flint 10 Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1249 Medieval Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pottery 2 previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1250 Struck Flint 3 Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further.

Page 323 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1251 Burnt Flint 11 Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1252 Post-Medieval Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible And Modern previously removed and cannot Change Pottery therefore be impacted further. 1253 Medieval Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pottery 3 previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1254 Linear Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Features 3 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1256 Neatham Medium If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Manor Grange present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1257 Site Of Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Romano- heritage asset is predicted. The Change British Villa, value of this heritage asset is Neatham primarily derived from its physical Manor remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage

Page 324 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1258 Roman Coin Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1259 Roman Medium If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Occupation At present, no physical impact on this Change Manor heritage asset is predicted. The Cottages, value of this heritage asset is Neatham primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1260 1 And 3, Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Lower effects on setting due to the Change Neatham Mill distance and inherent shielding Lane (See between the project and this Details For heritage asset. Further Address Information) 1261 Holybourne Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. There Change are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1262 Oak Cottage Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1263 Holybourne Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Forge effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding

Page 325 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation between the project and this heritage asset. 1264 Coin Hoard, Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Haw Bridge previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1265 Roman Road, Negligible If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Rr16 London- present, no physical impact on this Change Winchester heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1266 Flint Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Implements previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1267 Wyke Fulling Low If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Mill present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1268 Findspot, Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Bonham's previously removed and cannot Change Farm therefore be impacted further. 1270 Linear Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cropmark heritage asset is predicted. The Change Features value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no

Page 326 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1271 Isington Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. There Change are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1273 Froyle Low If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1274 Site Of Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Glasshouses heritage asset is predicted. The Change & Possible value of this heritage asset is Cistern, N Of primarily derived from its physical Froyle House remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1276 Undated Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cropmarks heritage asset is predicted. The Change Near Froyle value of this heritage asset is Mill primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage

Page 327 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1277 Prehistoric Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Findspot Near previously removed and cannot Change Isington Mill therefore be impacted further. Lane 1278 Site Of Roman Medium This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Villa, South previously destroyed and cannot Change West Of therefore be impacted further. Coldrey House 1279 Coldrey Low If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1280 Greystones Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1281 Bentley Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. There Change are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1282 Possible Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Moated Site heritage asset is predicted. There Change are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 328 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1283 Medieval Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pottery 5 previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1284 Roman Pottery Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 3 previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1286 Pax Hill Negligible If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible School present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1289 Roman Low This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cremation previously destroyed and cannot Change Burial therefore be impacted further. 1291 Roman Coin Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Hoard previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1292 Tranchet Axe Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1293 Prehistoric Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Flint Work, previously removed and cannot Change north Of therefore be impacted further. Barley Pound 1294 Clare Park Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Findspot previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1295 Crondall Low If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible present, no physical impact on this Change

Page 329 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1296 Crondall War Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Memorial effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1300 Withy Copse Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1301 Pillbox - Type Low No physical impacts on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 24 heritage asset, or on known Change archaeological remains which form the setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. There are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project 1302 Type 24 Low No physical impacts on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pillbox 1 heritage asset, or on known Change archaeological remains which form the setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. There are no impact pathways for effects on

Page 330 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project 1303 WWII Pillbox Low No physical impacts on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset, or on known Change archaeological remains which form the setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. There are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project 1304 WWII Pillbox, Low No physical impacts on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible E Of Church heritage asset, or on known Change Lane, Ewshot archaeological remains which form the setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. There are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project 1305 Site Of House Low If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1306 Site Of C19 Low If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Brickworks, present, no physical impact on this Change Homecroft heritage asset is predicted. The Farm value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical

Page 331 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1307 WWII Pillbox, Low No physical impacts on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Ewshot 1 heritage asset, or on known Change archaeological remains which form the setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. There are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project 1308 WWII Pillbox, Low No physical impacts on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Ewshot 2 heritage asset, or on known Change archaeological remains which form the setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. There are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project 1309 Site Of Low If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Agricultural present, no physical impact on this Change Complex heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1310 WWII Pillbox, Low No physical impacts on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible N Of Ewshot heritage asset, or on known Change archaeological remains which form the setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. There are no

Page 332 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project 1311 Pillbox, Sw Low No physical impacts on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Edge Of heritage asset, or on known Change Riddings archaeological remains which Copse form the setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. There are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project 1312 Type 24 Low No physical impacts on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pillbox 8 heritage asset, or on known Change archaeological remains which form the setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. There are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project 1313 'Type 24' Low No physical impacts on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pillbox heritage asset, or on known Change archaeological remains which form the setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. There are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project

Page 333 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1314 Part Of WWII Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Barbed Wire previously removed and cannot Change Fence Line, N therefore be impacted further. Of Riddings Copse 2 1315 Part Of WWII Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Barbed Wire previously removed and cannot Change Fence Line, N therefore be impacted further. Of Riddings Copse 1 1316 Part Of WWII Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Barbed Wire previously removed and cannot Change Fence Line, N therefore be impacted further. Of Riddings Copse 3 1317 Pillbox, Nw Low No physical impacts on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Riddings heritage asset, or on known Change Copse archaeological remains which form the setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. There are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project 1318 WWII Pillbox, Low No physical impacts on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible north East heritage asset, or on known Change Edge Of archaeological remains which Riddings form the setting of this heritage Copse 1 asset, are predicted. There are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project

Page 334 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1319 WWII Pillbox, Low No physical impacts on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible N Edge Of heritage asset, or on known Change Riddings archaeological remains which Copse form the setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. There are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project 1320 WWII Pillbox, Low No physical impacts on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Se Of Stillers heritage asset, or on known Change Farm archaeological remains which form the setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. There are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project 1321 Part Of WWII Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Barbed Wire previously removed and cannot Change Fence Line, N therefore be impacted further. Of Riddings Copse 4 1322 Part Of WWII Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Barbed Wire previously removed and cannot Change Fence Line, N therefore be impacted further. Of Riddings Copse 5 1323 Queen Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Elizabeth II heritage asset is predicted. There Change Barracks And are no impact pathways for effects Wakeford on setting due to the distance and Copse

Page 335 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1324 The Old Horns Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1330 Arrow Road, Negligible If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cove present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1331 Potential Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Saxon previously destroyed and cannot Change Settlement therefore be impacted further. 1332 Medieval Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pottery 6 previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1333 Site Of Farm Negligible If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Buildings, St present, no physical impact on this Change Christopher heritage asset is predicted. The Place, Cove value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1334 Cove Negligible If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is

Page 336 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1336 Site Of Hop Low If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Kilns, St present, no physical impact on this Change Christopher heritage asset is predicted. The Place, Cove value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1337 Old Pottery Low If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1338 Tile Kiln, Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Former previously destroyed and cannot Change Queen's Head therefore be impacted further. Public House 1339 Modern Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Artefacts, 19 previously removed and cannot Change Cove Road, therefore be impacted further. Farnborough 1340 Farnborough Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Church heritage asset is predicted. There Change are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and

Page 337 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1341 St Michael's Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Abbey heritage asset is predicted. The Change Conservation Area is bounded to the north by a railway line, to the west by the A325, and to the east by a railway line and the A331. This heritage asset therefore experiences visual and noise in 1342 19th Century Low If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Kiln 2 present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1345 Corps Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cenotaph, effects on setting due to the Change Princess Royal distance and inherent shielding Barracks, between the project and this Deepcut heritage asset. 1346 War Memorial, Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Princess Royal effects on setting due to the Change Barracks,, distance and inherent shielding Camberley between the project and this heritage asset. 1347 Mesolithic Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Flaked Axe, previously removed and cannot Change Frimley therefore be impacted further.

Page 338 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1350 Black Flint Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Core previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1351 Round Butt Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Round Barrow previously destroyed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1352 Possible Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Barrow Site, previously destroyed and cannot Change Deepcut therefore be impacted further. Barracks 1353 Undated Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Enclosure/Pos heritage asset is predicted. The Change sible Fort value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1354 U Shaped Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Enclosure, heritage asset is predicted. The Change Frimley Fuel value of this heritage asset is Allotments primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1355 Possible Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Military heritage asset is predicted. There Change Trenches, are no impact pathways for effects Chobham on setting due to the distance and Ranges inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 339 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1356 Foundations, Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Frith Hill heritage asset is predicted. There Change Woodlands, are no impact pathways for effects Frimley on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1358 The Maultway, Low This traditional route has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Possible superseded by a modern roadway Change Droveway, along the same alignment. It is West End highly likely that any archaeological remains associated with the original routeway have been previously impacted by the modern development and there will be no 1359 Military Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Fieldworks, heritage asset is predicted. There Change Westend are no impact pathways for effects Common West on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1360 Earthwork Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cropmarks: heritage asset is predicted. There Change West End are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1362 The Red Low This traditional route has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Road, South superseded by a modern roadway Change Of Lightwater along the same alignment. Any archaeological remains associated with the original routeway are likely to be previously impacted by

Page 340 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation the modern development. As long as the road is maintained alo 1364 Greyspot Hill Low This heritage asset is situated n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Bank And within close proximity of the Order Change Ditch, Possible Limits; however, the pipeline route Boundary at this point is along the line of Bank. modern road and there will likely be a pre-existing impact to any potential archaeological remains which may have be 1365 Possible Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Military heritage asset is predicted. There Change Fieldworks/ are no impact pathways for effects Cultivation on setting due to the distance and Marks, West inherent shielding between the End Common project and this heritage asset. East 1366 Military Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Fieldworks, heritage asset is predicted. There Change Hangmoor Hill are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1367 Enclosure, Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cold Harbour previously destroyed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1369 Great And Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Little Kettle, heritage asset is predicted. There Change Possible Fish are no impact pathways for effects Weir on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 341 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1370 Smiths Farm Medium If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1371 Lightwater Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible War Memorial effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1372 Buckstone Medium If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farm present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1373 Woods Farm Medium If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1374 Pipers Farm Medium If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is

Page 342 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1375 Westcroft Medium If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farm present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1377 The Three Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Mariners And heritage asset is predicted. There Change Cottage To are no impact pathways for effects West on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1379 Nursery Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1380 Fosters Farm Medium If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1381 Queen Anne Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible House effects on setting due to the Change

Page 343 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1382 Section Of Low No physical impacts on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Chobham Park heritage asset, or on known Change Pale 1 archaeological remains which may form the setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. Furtheremore, there are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the inherent shielding between the pr 1383 Pound Cottage Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1384 Birch Hall Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1385 Langshot Medium If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1386 Chest Tomb, 3 Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Yards South effects on setting due to the Change Of South Wall distance and inherent shielding

Page 344 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation Of Church Of between the project and this St John The heritage asset. Baptist 1387 Birch Tomb 1 Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Yard South Of effects on setting due to the Change South Aisle Of distance and inherent shielding Church Of St between the project and this John The heritage asset. Baptist 1388 Church Of St Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible John The effects on setting due to the Change Baptist distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1389 Jenkins Tomb Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Two Yards effects on setting due to the Change East Of distance and inherent shielding Church Of St between the project and this John The heritage asset. Baptist 1391 Windlesham Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible War Memorial effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1393 Section Of Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Chobham Park heritage asset is predicted. There Change Pale 2 are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1394 Fishpond Site: Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Glovers Ponds heritage asset is predicted. The Change

Page 345 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1395 Enclosure: Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Jane Reads heritage asset is predicted. There Change are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1396 Possible Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Droving Trails: heritage asset is predicted. The Change Chobham/Lon value of this heritage asset is gcross primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1397 Possible Tree Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Enclosure heritage asset, or on associated Change Rings, heritage assets, is predicted. The Gracious value of this heritage asset is Pond, primarily derived from its physical Chobham 1 remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understandin 1398 Pond: Round Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pond heritage asset is predicted. There Change are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and

Page 346 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1399 Historic Road: Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Old Windsor heritage asset is predicted. The Change Road value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1402 Possible Tree Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Enclosure heritage asset, or on associated Change Rings, heritage assets, is predicted. The Gracious value of this heritage asset is Pond, primarily derived from its physical Chobham 2 remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understandin 1403 Walnut Tree Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farm House effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1404 Possible Tree Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Enclosure heritage asset, or on associated Change Rings, heritage assets, is predicted. The Gracious value of this heritage asset is Pond, primarily derived from its physical Chobham 3 remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understandin 1405 Possible Tree Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Enclosure heritage asset, or on associated Change

Page 347 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation Rings, heritage assets, is predicted. The Gracious value of this heritage asset is Pond, primarily derived from its physical Chobham 4 remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understandin 1406 Historic Track: Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Monks Walk heritage asset is predicted. There Change are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1407 Hall Grove Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible School effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1408 Possible Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Military heritage asset is predicted. The Change Fieldworks, value of this heritage asset is Bee Garden primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1410 Botley Park Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pale, Chertsey heritage asset is predicted. The Change 1 value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and relationship to other assets. Any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and

Page 348 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1412 24 And 24A, Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible High Street effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1415 Possible Medium No physical impacts on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Round Barrow heritage asset, or on other bowl Change barrows within the vicinity which forms the broader setting of this heritage asset, are predicted. There is currently no intervisibility between these heritage assets. There are no impact pathwa 1418 Botley Park Low If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Manor House, present, no physical impact on this Change Runnymede heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1419 Simplemarsh Medium If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farm, present, no physical impact on this Change Addlestone, heritage asset is predicted. The Runnymede value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1421 Addlestone Medium If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Village present, no physical impact on this Change (Hamlet) heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is

Page 349 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1422 Field System, Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Sudbrook heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1423 Linear And Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Ring Ditch heritage asset is predicted. The Change Cropmarks, value of this heritage asset is Chertsey primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1425 Lime Ground, Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Possible Lime previously destroyed and cannot Change Kiln Site, therefore be impacted further. Chertsey 1427 Neolithic Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Ground Flint previously removed and cannot Change Axe therefore be impacted further. 1429 Possible Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Medieval heritage asset is predicted. The Change Pottery Kiln: value of this heritage asset is Victory Park, primarily derived from its physical Addlestone remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no

Page 350 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1431 Pottery Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Workshop, previously removed and cannot Change Victory Park therefore be impacted further. Pot Wasters 1432 2 Polished Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Flint Axes previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1433 Green Lane Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farm, previously destroyed and cannot Change Chertsey therefore be impacted further. 1434 Botley Park Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pale, Chertsey heritage asset is predicted. The Change 2 value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1435 Linear Ditch Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible And Pit heritage asset is predicted. The Change Cropmarks, value of this heritage asset is Chertsey primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1436 Cropmarks/Soi Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible lmarks: heritage asset is predicted. The Change Chertsey 1 value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or

Page 351 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1438 Lyne War Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Memorial effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1439 War Memorial, Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible St Marys effects on setting due to the Change Church, Lyne distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1440 War Memorial, Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Holy Trinity effects on setting due to the Change Church, Lyne distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1441 Human Skull - Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Undated 1 previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1442 12th - 13th Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Century previously removed and cannot Change Pottery therefore be impacted further. 1443 Palaeolithic Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Acheulian previously removed and cannot Change Ovate Flint, therefore be impacted further. Chertsey 1444 Early Iron Age Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pottery Sherd, previously removed and cannot Change Chertsey therefore be impacted further.

Page 352 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1445 Hersham Medium If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farm, present, no physical impact on this Change Chertsey heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1446 Cropmarks, Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Indicating heritage asset is predicted. The Change Possible value of this heritage asset is Enclosures, primarily derived from its physical trys Hill Farm remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1447 15th/17th Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Century previously removed and cannot Change Reihenpfennig therefore be impacted further. 1448 Medieval And Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 17th Century previously removed and cannot Change Horseshoes therefore be impacted further. 1449 Trys Hill Farm Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1450 Early Bronze Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Age Flat Axe, previously removed and cannot Change Chertsey therefore be impacted further. 1451 Environmental Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Evidence, 95- heritage asset is predicted. The Change 133 Eastworth value of this heritage asset is

Page 353 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation Road, primarily derived from its physical Chertsey remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1452 St Ann's, Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Chertsey effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1454 Prehistoric Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Features, previously destroyed and cannot Change Chertsey therefore be impacted further. Revitalization Scheme Phase 7, Chertsey 1455 Early To Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Middle Saxon previously destroyed and cannot Change Features, therefore be impacted further. Chertsey Revitalization Scheme Phase 8, Chertsey 1456 Post-Medieval Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Features, previously destroyed and cannot Change Chertsey therefore be impacted further. Revitalisation Scheme Phase 7

Page 354 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1457 Medieval Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Features, previously destroyed and cannot Change Chertsey therefore be impacted further. Revitalisation Scheme Phase 7 1 1458 Saxo-Norman Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible And Early previously destroyed and cannot Change Medieval therefore be impacted further. Features, Chertsey Revitalisation Scheme Phase 7 1459 Late Medieval Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Or Early Post- previously destroyed and cannot Change Medieval therefore be impacted further. Wooden Bowls, Chertsey Revitalization Scheme, Chertsey 1460 Medieval Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Features, previously destroyed and cannot Change Chertsey therefore be impacted further. Revitalisation Scheme Phase 7 2 1461 Possible Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Location Of A previously destroyed and cannot Change High Status therefore be impacted further. Medieval

Page 355 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation Building And Pond/Soakaw ay, Chertsey Revitalization Scheme Phase 8, Chertsey 1462 Roman Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Features, previously destroyed and cannot Change Chertsey therefore be impacted further. Revitalization Scheme Phase 7, Chertsey 1463 Residual Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Roman Finds, previously destroyed and cannot Change Chertsey therefore be impacted further. Revitalisation Scheme Phase 7 1464 Residual Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Prehistoric previously destroyed and cannot Change Struck Flint, therefore be impacted further. Chertsey Revitalisation Scheme Phase 7 1465 Saxon Pottery, Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Chertsey previously destroyed and cannot Change Revitalisation therefore be impacted further. Scheme Phase 7

Page 356 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1466 Chertsey Low If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Malthouse, present, no physical impact on this Change Post Medieval heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1467 Medieval Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Features previously destroyed and cannot Change Ranging From therefore be impacted further. 10th To 15th Century, Chertsey Revitalisation Scheme: Phase 5 1468 Styvinton, Medium If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Possible present, no physical impact on this Change Planned heritage asset is predicted. The Saxon Hamlet, value of this heritage asset is Chertsey primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1469 18th Century Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Features, previously destroyed and cannot Change Land South Of therefore be impacted further. Pyrcroft Road, Chertsey 1470 Late Bronze Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Age previously removed and cannot Change Spearhead therefore be impacted further.

Page 357 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1471 Roman Bronze Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Dish (Patera) previously removed and cannot Change 1St Century therefore be impacted further. Ad, thames Between Walton And Chertsey 1472 Corporation Of Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible London Tax effects on setting due to the Change Post, South distance and inherent shielding Side Of between the project and this Chertsey heritage asset. Bridge 1473 Bronze Age Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Sword, previously removed and cannot Change Chertsey therefore be impacted further. Bridge 1474 Boar's Tusk: Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Chertsey previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1475 Corporation Of Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible London Tax effects on setting due to the Change Post, 242 distance and inherent shielding Thameside, between the project and this Chertsey heritage asset. 1476 Chertsey Lock, Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Chertsey effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1478 Dover House Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding

Page 358 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation between the project and this heritage asset. 1479 83-89, London Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Street effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1480 Ash Cottage 2 Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1481 Grove Cottage Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1482 94, 96 And 98, Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Guildford effects on setting due to the Change Street (See distance and inherent shielding Details For between the project and this Further heritage asset. Address Information) 1483 King's Head Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Hotel effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1484 94,96,98,104,1 Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 06 And 108, effects on setting due to the Change Guildford distance and inherent shielding Street

Page 359 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation between the project and this heritage asset. 1485 113 And 113A, Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Guildford effects on setting due to the Change Street distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1486 115, Guildford Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Street effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1487 117, Guildford Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Street effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1488 Westminster Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Bank effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1489 Roman Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Habitation previously removed and cannot Change Site, therefore be impacted further. Shepperton 1490 118 And 120, Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Guildford effects on setting due to the Change Street distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 360 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1491 119, Guildford Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Street effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1492 124 And 124A, Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Guildford effects on setting due to the Change Street distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1493 Prince Regent Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Inn effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1494 121, Guildford Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Street effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1495 123, Guildford Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Street effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1496 127-133, Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Guildford effects on setting due to the Change Street distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1497 Chertsey Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Conservation heritage asset is predicted. There Change Area are no impact pathways for effects

Page 361 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1498 Corporation Of Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible London Tax effects on setting due to the Change Post, distance and inherent shielding thameside, between the project and this Chertsey heritage asset. 1499 Rectilinear Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible And Ring Ditch heritage asset is predicted. The Change Cropmarks, value of this heritage asset is Littleton primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1503 Abbey Mews Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1504 Earthworks On High No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Laleham heritage asset is predicted. There Change Burway are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1505 Icehouse At Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Laleham Park, effects on setting due to the Change Laleham distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 362 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1507 Bronze Age Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Features And previously destroyed and cannot Change Cremations: therefore be impacted further. Home Farm, Laleham 1508 Bronze Age Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Settlement, previously destroyed and cannot Change Land At Home therefore be impacted further. Farm, Laleham 1509 Neolithic/Bron Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible ze Age Flint previously removed and cannot Change Working Site: therefore be impacted further. Home Farm, Laleham 1510 London- Low The proposed route of this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Silchester heritage asset follows the modern Change Roman Road Staines Road and, if archaeological remains associated with this heritage asset were present, they would likely have been destroyed by this previous development. No change is therefore predicted 1511 Ring Ditch Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cropmarks, heritage asset is predicted. The Change Laleham 1 value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage

Page 363 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1512 Bronze Age Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Field System, previously destroyed and cannot Change Woodthorpe therefore be impacted further. Road, Ashford 1513 Roman Field Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible System - previously destroyed and cannot Change Continuation therefore be impacted further. Of Use Of Field System Established In The Bronze Age, Woodthorpe Road, Ashford 1514 Middle Iron Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Age previously destroyed and cannot Change Settlement, therefore be impacted further. Woodthorpe Road, Ashford 1515 Rectangular Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Post-Built previously destroyed and cannot Change Structure With therefore be impacted further. Internal Division, Unknown Date, Woodthorpe Road, Ashford 1516 Mid/Late Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Neolithic Ring previously destroyed and cannot Change Ditch - therefore be impacted further. Possible Hengiform

Page 364 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation Monument Or Barrow, Woodthorpe Road, Ashford 1517 Mesolithic Flint Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Blade, previously destroyed and cannot Change Woodthorpe therefore be impacted further. Road, Ashford 1518 Possible Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Fieldsystem previously destroyed and cannot Change And Ditch: therefore be impacted further. Brooklands College, Church Road, Ashford 1519 Low Broad Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Bank, Ashford heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1520 Clockhouse Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Lane Gravel previously destroyed and cannot Change Pits, Ashford therefore be impacted further. 1522 20th Century Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Landfill Site, heritage asset is predicted. The Change Clockhouse value of this heritage asset is Lane, (West primarily derived from its physical Of), East remains and any potential noise or Bedfont visual intrusion would have no

Page 365 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1523 Possible Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Roman previously destroyed and cannot Change Features: therefore be impacted further. Ashford Hospital, Long Lane, Ashford 1524 Bronze Age Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Enclosure And previously destroyed and cannot Change Features: therefore be impacted further. Ashford Hospital, Long Lane, Ashford 1525 Prehistoric Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Struck Flints, previously destroyed and cannot Change Baked Clay therefore be impacted further. And Pottery: Ashford Hospital, Long Lane, Ashford 1526 Land At Long Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Lane, Stanwell previously destroyed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1527 Staines Road, Negligible The proposed route may impact n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible (North Of). this heritage asset; however, as a Change [Heathrow Oil Modern landfill site, this heritage Terminal], asset has no archaeological West Bedfont interest and no archaeological {20th Century materials that would be altered. Landfill} 1528 Earthworks Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible And Enclosure heritage asset is predicted. The Change

Page 366 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation Cropmarks, value of this heritage asset is Stanwell primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1529 Gracious Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pond, heritage asset is predicted. The Change Enclosure value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1530 Mayfield Farm Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1531 Ring Ditch Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cropmarks, previously destroyed and cannot Change Stanwell therefore be impacted further. 1532 Two Ring Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Ditch heritage asset is predicted. The Change Cropmarks, value of this heritage asset is Stanwell primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1550 NMP Oval Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Features heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or

Page 367 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1556 NMP Chalk Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pits 1 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1558 NMP Chalk Pit Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 3 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1560 NMP Pit 2 Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1561 NMP Chalk Pit Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 4 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no

Page 368 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1562 NMP Dew Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pond Or heritage asset is predicted. The Change Quarry Pits 1 value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1563 NMP Pits 3 Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1564 NMP Hollow Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1565 NMP Ring Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Ditch 1 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no

Page 369 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1566 NMP Spoil Tip Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1567 NMP Chalk Pit Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 5 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1568 NMP Dew Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pond Or heritage asset is predicted. The Change Quarry Pit 2 value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1569 NMP Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Trackway 1 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no

Page 370 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1571 NMP Quarry Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pits 5 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1572 NMP Chalk Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pits 6 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1573 NMP Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Settlement heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1574 NMP Field Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible System 3 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no

Page 371 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1575 NMP Field Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible System 4 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1576 NMP Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Enclosure 1 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1577 NMP Field Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible System 5 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1578 NMP Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Trackway 2 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no

Page 372 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1581 NMP Field Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible System 7 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1582 NMP Chalk Pit Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 7 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1583 NMP Pit 4 Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1584 NMP Chalk Pit Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 8 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no

Page 373 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1587 NMP Field Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible System 9 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1588 NMP Ditch Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1590 NMP Field Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Boundary 3 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1591 NMP Pit 5 Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no

Page 374 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1594 NMP Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Enclosure 3 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1595 NMP Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cropmark heritage asset is predicted. The Change Complex value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1596 NMP Pit 6 Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1597 NMP Ridge Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible And Furrow heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no

Page 375 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1598 NMP Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Enclosure 4 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1599 NMP Mound Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1605 NMP Field Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible System 11 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1606 NMP Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Enclosure 5 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no

Page 376 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1607 NMP Field Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible System 12 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1608 NMP Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Enclosure 6 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1609 NMP Chalk Pit Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 9 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1610 NMP Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Enclosure 7 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no

Page 377 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1611 NMP Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Enclosure 8 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1612 NMP Chalk Pit Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 10 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1613 NMP Field Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible System 13 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1615 NMP Pit 7 Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no

Page 378 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1616 NMP Pit 8 Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1621 NMP Field Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Boundary 6 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1622 NMP Quarry Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pit 6 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1623 NMP Dew Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pond Or heritage asset is predicted. The Change Quarry Pit 3 value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no

Page 379 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1626 NMP Linear Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Features 2 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1627 NMP Field Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Boundary Or heritage asset is predicted. The Change Trackway 1 value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1628 NMP Dew Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pond Or heritage asset is predicted. The Change Quarry Pit 5 value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1629 NMP Dew Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pond Or heritage asset is predicted. The Change Quarry Pit 6 value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no

Page 380 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1630 NMP Pit 9 Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1632 NMP Dew Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pond Or heritage asset is predicted. The Change Quarry Pit 7 value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1633 NMP Ring Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Ditch 2 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1634 NMP Dew Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pond Or heritage asset is predicted. The Change Quarry Pit 8 value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no

Page 381 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1635 NMP Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Enclosure 10 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1636 NMP Field Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible System 15 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1637 NMP Dew Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pond Or heritage asset is predicted. The Change Quarry Pit 9 value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1638 NMP Dew Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pond Or heritage asset is predicted. The Change Quarry Pit 10 value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no

Page 382 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1640 NMP Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Enclosure 11 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1641 NMP Pit 10 Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1642 NMP Field Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible System 16 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1643 NMP Dew Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pond Or heritage asset is predicted. The Change Quarry Pit 11 value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no

Page 383 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1644 NMP Dew Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pond Or heritage asset is predicted. The Change Quarry Pit 12 value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1645 NMP Dew Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pond Or heritage asset is predicted. The Change Quarry Pit 13 value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1646 NMP Field Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible System 17 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1647 NMP Pit 11 Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no

Page 384 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1648 NMP Ditch Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible And Pit heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1649 NMP Field Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible System 18 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1650 NMP Dew Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pond Or heritage asset is predicted. The Change Quarry Pit 14 value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1652 NMP Field Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible System 19 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no

Page 385 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1653 NMP Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Enclosure 12 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1654 NMP Dew Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pond Or heritage asset is predicted. The Change Quarry Pit 16 value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1655 NMP Field Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible System 20 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1657 NMP Field Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Ditches heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no

Page 386 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1659 NMP Dew Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pond Or heritage asset is predicted. The Change Quarry Pit 17 value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1662 NMP Dew Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pond Or heritage asset is predicted. The Change Quarry Pit 18 value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1663 NMP Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Enclosure 13 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1664 NMP Dew Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pond Or heritage asset is predicted. The Change Quarry Pit 19 value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no

Page 387 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1665 NMP Field Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Boundaries 4 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1666 NMP Field Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Boundary 8 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1667 NMP Dew Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pond Or heritage asset is predicted. The Change Quarry Pit 20 value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1668 NMP Field Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible System 21 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no

Page 388 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1670 NMP Field Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible System 22 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1671 NMP Pit 13 Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1672 NMP Pit 14 Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1673 NMP Dew Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pond Or heritage asset is predicted. The Change Quarry Pit 21 value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no

Page 389 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1674 NMP Field Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Boundary 10 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1675 NMP Field Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Boundary 11 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1676 NMP Circular Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Features heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1677 NMP Dew Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pond Or heritage asset is predicted. The Change Quarry Pit 22 value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no

Page 390 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1678 NMP Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Enclosure 14 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1679 NMP Field Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Boundary 12 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1680 NMP Field Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Boundaries 5 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1681 NMP Dew Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pond Or heritage asset is predicted. The Change Quarry Pit 23 value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no

Page 391 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1682 NMP Quarry Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pit 7 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1683 NMP Field Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible System 23 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1684 NMP Dew Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pond Or heritage asset is predicted. The Change Quarry Pit 24 value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1685 NMP Field Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible System 24 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no

Page 392 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1687 NMP Quarry Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pit 8 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1688 NMP Dew Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pond Or heritage asset is predicted. The Change Quarry Pit 25 value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1689 NMP Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Enclosure 15 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1692 NMP Field Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Boundary 13 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no

Page 393 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1693 NMP Field Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible System 26 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1694 NMP Field Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Boundary 14 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1695 NMP Field Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Boundary Or heritage asset is predicted. The Change Trackway 2 value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1696 NMP Quarry Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pit 9 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no

Page 394 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1697 NMP Field Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible System 27 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1698 NMP Pit 15 Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1699 NMP Field Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible System 28 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1700 NMP Dew Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pond Or heritage asset is predicted. The Change Quarry Pit 27 value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no

Page 395 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1701 NMP Dew Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pond Or heritage asset is predicted. The Change Quarry Pit 28 value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1703 NMP Dew Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pond Or heritage asset is predicted. The Change Quarry Pit 29 value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1705 NMP Pit 16 Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1706 NMP Field Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Boundary 15 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no

Page 396 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1707 NMP Field Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Boundary 16 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1708 Field System Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cropmarks 1 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1711 Circular Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Feature heritage asset is predicted. The Change Cropmark value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1712 Irregular Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Linear heritage asset is predicted. The Change Features value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no

Page 397 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1713 Bude Cottage Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible ; Calais effects on setting due to the Change Cottage distance and inherent shielding ; Penang between the project and this Cottage heritage asset. 1714 Cedar House Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible ; Cedars Court effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1715 Field System Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cropmarks 3 heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1716 Circular Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Depression heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1717 Field Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Boundary heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or

Page 398 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1744 2 Newhouse Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farm Cottages effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1746 Barn At Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Redlands effects on setting due to the Change Farm distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1751 Field Se Of Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Rooksgrove heritage asset is predicted. The Change Farm value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1753 NMP Field Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible System heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1754 Barn To Botley Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Park, Stonehill effects on setting due to the Change Road, inherent shielding between the Ottershaw project and this heritage asset.

Page 399 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1755 Barrow N Of Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Arnold's Firs heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1770 NMP Chalk Pit Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1771 NMP Field Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible System heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1772 NMP Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Enclosure heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage

Page 400 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1773 Chalk Pit Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1774 Castle Bailey Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1775 Site Of Ditch Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1776 Site Of Pond Negligible This heritage asset is no longer n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Or Hollow visible on satellite imagery. If Change archaeological remains associated with this heritage asset are present, as below ground remains, our understanding of the significance of this heritage asset would primarily derive from its

Page 401 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1777 WWII Pill Box, Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Ne Of Ewshot effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1778 Site Of House, Low If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible West Tisted present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1779 Flint Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1780 Neatham Low If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1781 Millcourt Low If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Manor present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa

Page 402 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1782 Site Of Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Medieval heritage asset is predicted. The Change Manor House value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1783 The Warren, Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Chertsey heritage asset is predicted. There Change are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1784 Flints Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1785 Site Of Pond Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1786 Bronze Age Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Arrowhead previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1787 Post Medieval Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Field heritage asset is predicted. The Change Boundary value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or

Page 403 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1788 Pond, Manor Low If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farm, West present, no physical impact on this Change Tisted heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1789 1 Newhouse Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farm Cottages effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1791 Tudor Cottage Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1792 Vineries Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1793 Circular Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Feature By heritage asset is predicted. The Change Bentley Castle value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no

Page 404 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1794 Struck Flint Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1795 Iron Age Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pottery previously removed and cannot Change Findspot therefore be impacted further. 1796 Roman Pottery Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1797 Medieval Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pottery previously removed and cannot Change Findspot therefore be impacted further. 1798 Stuck Flint Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Findspot previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1799 Post Medieval Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pottery previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1800 107,109 And Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 111, London effects on setting due to the Change Road distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1801 The Round Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible House effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1802 Holybourne Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Lodge effects on setting due to the Change

Page 405 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1803 2 And 4, Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Church Lane effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1805 The Beeches Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1806 Whiten Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage And effects on setting due to the Change Yeoman distance and inherent shielding Cottage between the project and this heritage asset. 1807 123 And 125, Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible London Road effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1808 Former Post Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Office effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1809 127-133, Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible London Road effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 406 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1810 124 And 126, Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible London Road effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1811 Anne's Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1812 143 And 145 Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible And 149-153, effects on setting due to the Change London Road distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1813 Struck Flint Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1814 Burnt Flint Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1815 Roman Coins, Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Neatham previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1816 Stuck Flint Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1817 Roman Pottery Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1818 C Of E Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Primary effects on setting due to the Change

Page 407 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation School, Upper distance and inherent shielding Froyle between the project and this heritage asset. 1819 Barn 5 Metres Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible South West Of effects on setting due to the Change Pullens distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1820 Pullens Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1821 Iron Age Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pottery Sherd previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1822 Field Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Boundaries heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1823 Roman Urn Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1824 Prehistoric Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Saddle Quern, previously removed and cannot Change Ne Of Barley therefore be impacted further. Pound

Page 408 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1825 Mesolithic Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Tranchet Axe previously removed and cannot Change Findspot therefore be impacted further. 1826 Pike House Negligible If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1827 Chapel Of The Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Resurrection effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1829 Outbuildings Negligible If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1830 Newton Davis Negligible If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Complex present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa

Page 409 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1831 Burnham Negligible If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible House present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1832 Farm Building Negligible If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1833 Stores Negligible If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1834 Probably Low If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Former Site Of present, no physical impact on this Change Farnborough heritage asset is predicted. The Court value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa

Page 410 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1835 Pavilion Negligible If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1836 Heywood Negligible If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Building present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1837 Treloar School Negligible If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Dining Rooms present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1838 Housing Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Estate, effects on setting due to the Change Rafborough distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1839 West Tisted Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical

Page 411 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1840 Post Medieval Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Pottery previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1841 National Gas Negligible If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Turbine present, no physical impact on this Change Establishment, heritage asset is predicted. The Pyestock Cove value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1843 Agricultural Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Building At effects on setting due to the Change Bury Court distance and inherent shielding Farm between the project and this heritage asset. 1845 Hop Kilns At Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Bury Court effects on setting due to the Change Farm distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1846 Oasthouses At Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Bury Court effects on setting due to the Change Farm distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1847 Pillbox - Type Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 24 effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding

Page 412 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation between the project and this heritage asset. 1848 Mill Court Low If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1849 Burnt Flint Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Findspot previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1850 Barn At Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Thorns effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1851 144 Rectory Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Road effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1852 Bentley Castle Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously destroyed during Change archaeological excavation and cannot therefore be impacted further. 1853 The Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cricketers, effects on setting due to the Change Dippenhall distance and inherent shielding Street, between the project and this Crondall, heritage asset.

Page 413 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation Farnham, Surrey, GU10 5NX 1854 Out Field, Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Dippenhall effects on setting due to the Change Street, distance and inherent shielding Crondall, between the project and this Farnham, heritage asset. Surrey, GU10 5NX 1855 Woodlands, Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Ewshot Lane, effects on setting due to the Change Ewshot, distance and inherent shielding Farnham, between the project and this Surrey, GU10 heritage asset. 5BP 1856 Site Of Pond Negligible This heritage asset is no longer n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible visible on satellite imagery. If Change archaeological remains associated with this heritage asset are present, as below ground remains, our understanding of the significance of this heritage asset would primarily derive from its 1859 Wickets, Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Dippenhall effects on setting due to the Change Street, distance and inherent shielding Crondall, between the project and this Farnham, heritage asset. Surrey, GU10 5NX 1861 Neatham Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Manor House effects on setting due to the Change

Page 414 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1862 Burnt Flint Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1863 Brickyard Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottages, effects on setting due to the Change Church Lane, distance and inherent shielding Ewshot, between the project and this Farnham, heritage asset. Surrey 1865 The Old Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Village Stores, effects on setting due to the Change Dippenhall distance and inherent shielding Street, between the project and this Crondall, heritage asset. Farnham, Surrey, GU10 5NZ 1866 Field System Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1867 Fleet Infant Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible School effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 415 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1868 National Gas Negligible If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Turbine present, no physical impact on this Change Establishment heritage asset is predicted. The (Cell 3) value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1870 National Gas Negligible If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Turbine present, no physical impact on this Change Establishment heritage asset is predicted. The (Cells 1+2) value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1871 National Gas Negligible If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Turbine present, no physical impact on this Change Establishment heritage asset is predicted. The (Cell 4) value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1872 Froyle Place Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottages effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1873 National Gas Negligible If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Turbine present, no physical impact on this Change Establishment, heritage asset is predicted. The Pyestock Cove value of this heritage asset is

Page 416 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1874 2 Park Lane Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1876 8 St Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Christopher effects on setting due to the Change Place, Cove distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1878 Earthen Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Boundary heritage asset is predicted. The Change Bank value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1879 Imperial Arms, Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible 12 effects on setting due to the Change Farnborough distance and inherent shielding Street, between the project and this Farnborough, heritage asset. Hampshire, GU14 8AG 1880 Porters Lodge Negligible If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is

Page 417 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1881 Heather Hills Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1882 Aircraft Crash: Low The exact location and potential n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Frimley for remains of the crash are Change unclear; however the location provided by the HER is over 350m away from the Order Limits and no physical impacts to this heritage asset are therefore predicted. 1884 76 High Street Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Frimley effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1886 1 - 7 Cedar Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Lane effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1887 Frimley Park Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Mansion effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1888 Probable Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Romano- previously destroyed during Change

Page 418 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation British archaeological excavation and Cremation cannot therefore be impacted Cemetery: further. Whitwell's Farm, Frimley 1890 World War Low The exact location and potential n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Two Aircraft for remains of the crash are Change Crash: Frimley unclear; however the location provided by the HER is over 350m away from the Order Limits and no physical impacts to this heritage asset are therefore predicted. 1893 Pillbox,Cove Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Green effects on setting due to the Change Allotments,Pro distance and inherent shielding spect between the project and this Road,Farnbor heritage asset. ough,Hampshi re,, 1894 Outbuilding, Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Imperial Arms, effects on setting due to the Change 12 distance and inherent shielding Farnborough between the project and this Street, heritage asset. Farnborough, Hampshire 1895 Manor Farm Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottages effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 419 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1896 Mesolithic/Neo Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible lithic Pick previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 1897 Boundary Wall Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible At Lord Mayor effects on setting due to the Change Treloar School distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1898 70 High Street Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1901 War Memorial, Low This memorial is situated inside n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible St Peters the church building and therefore Change Church, no impact pathways for effects on Frimley setting have been identified. 1903 War Memorial, Low This heritage asset is situated n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible St Peters within St Peters Church and there Change Church, are therefore no impact pathways Frimley for effects on setting between the project and this heritage asset. 1904 War Memorial, Low This heritage asset is situated n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible St Peters within St Peters Church and there Change Church, are therefore no impact pathways Frimley for effects on setting between the project and this heritage asset. 1905 War Memorial, Low This heritage asset is situated n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible St Peters within St Peters Church and there Change Church, are therefore no impact pathways Frimley for effects on setting between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 420 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1906 War Memorial, Low This heritage asset is situated n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible St Peters within St Peters Church and there Change Church, are therefore no impact pathways Frimley for effects on setting between the project and this heritage asset. 1907 War Memorial, Low This heritage asset is situated n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible St Peters within St Peters Church and there Change Church, are therefore no impact pathways Frimley for effects on setting between the project and this heritage asset. 1908 Neolithic Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Features, previously destroyed during Change Hengrove archaeological excavation and Farm, Staines cannot therefore be impacted further. 1909 Whitewell Low If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farm, Frimley present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1910 Frimley & Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Camberley effects on setting due to the Change District distance and inherent shielding Hospital between the project and this heritage asset. 1911 Medieval - Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Post-Medieval previously destroyed during Change Ditch archaeological excavation and cannot therefore be impacted further.

Page 421 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1912 St Catherines Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Residential effects on setting due to the Change Home inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1913 1 - 40 Apex Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Drive effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1914 Frimley Ponds, Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Fishponds And heritage asset is predicted. There Change Dam are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1915 Frog Mill Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. There Change are no impact pathways for effects on setting due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1916 Frimley Village Low If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1917 Cross Farm, Low If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Frimley present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is

Page 422 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1918 Church Of St Medium There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Andrew effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1919 Berry Hill, Low If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Possible present, no physical impact on this Change Barrow Or heritage asset is predicted. The Burh? value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1920 Drum And Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Monkey effects on setting due to the Change Cottage distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1922 Moor Farm Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1923 The Railway Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Arms effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset.

Page 423 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation 1924 The Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Ridgewood effects on setting due to the Change Centre distance and inherent shielding (Brompton between the project and this Hospital heritage asset. Sanitorium) 1926 Bramble Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage & effects on setting due to the Change Hawthorn distance and inherent shielding Cottage between the project and this heritage asset. 1932 Gates At Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Entrance To effects on setting due to the Change Westcroft Park distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1935 Ivy Dene Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1936 Gordon's Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible School effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1937 Timbers Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1938 Whitedown Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage effects on setting due to the Change

Page 424 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1939 Little Priory Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1940 Maybury Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible House effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1941 Frimley Low If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Church present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1942 Ice House At Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Botley Park, effects on setting due to the Change Stonehill inherent shielding between the Road, project and this heritage asset. Ottershaw 1943 Chertsey Road Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Bridge, A318, effects on setting due to the Change Chertsey inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1945 Linton Lodge, Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Longcross effects on setting due to the Change Road, Lyne distance and inherent shielding

Page 425 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation between the project and this heritage asset. 1946 Cast Iron Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Railings, effects on setting due to the Change Sheperton distance and inherent shielding Road between the project and this heritage asset. 1955 Church Of Our Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Lady Queen effects on setting due to the Change Of Heaven, distance and inherent shielding Frimley between the project and this heritage asset. 1956 Ashford Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Congregationa effects on setting due to the Change l Church / distance and inherent shielding Methodist between the project and this Church heritage asset. 1957 The White Negligible If archaeological remains are n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible House present, no physical impact on this Change heritage asset is predicted. The value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understa 1958 Ford Bridge Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible effects on setting due to the Change distance and inherent shielding between the project and this heritage asset. 1963 Redlands Low There are no impact pathways for n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farm, effects on setting due to the Change Redlands

Page 426 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation Lane, Ewshot, inherent shielding between the Farnham, project and this heritage asset. Surrey, GU10 5AS 1987 Geophysical Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Survey heritage asset is predicted. The Change Archaeological value of this heritage asset is Feature 10 primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1988 Geophysical Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Survey heritage asset is predicted. The Change Archaeological value of this heritage asset is Feature 11 primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1989 Geophysical Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Survey heritage asset is predicted. The Change Archaeological value of this heritage asset is Feature 12 primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 1990 Geophysical Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Survey heritage asset is predicted. The Change Archaeological value of this heritage asset is Feature 13 primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no

Page 427 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 2007 Freemantles Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farm heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 2008 Stonehill Low No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 2009 Windlesham Negligible No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Mill (Site of) heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 2010 Enclosure Medium No physical impact on this n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible heritage asset is predicted. The Change value of this heritage asset is primarily derived from its physical remains and any potential noise or visual intrusion would have no

Page 428 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation impact on our understanding and appreciation of this heritage 2011 Neolithic Flint Negligible This heritage asset has been n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Axe Findspot previously removed and cannot Change therefore be impacted further. 2012 Fieldview Medium This heritage asset is situated n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible within 1km of a Construction Change Logistics Hub. There are no pathways for impact on setting due to the inherent shielding from neighbouring properties. 2013 The Museum Medium This heritage asset is situated n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible At Lord Mayor within 1km of a Construction Change Treloar Logistics Hub. There are no Hospital pathways for impact on setting due to the inherent shielding from vegetation and neighbouring properties. 2014 Little Barton Medium This heritage asset is situated n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible within 500m of a Construction Change Logistics Hub. There are no pathways for impact on setting due to the inherent shielding from neighbouring properties. 2015 Chawton Park Medium This heritage asset is situated n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farmhouse within 500m of a Construction Change Logistics Hub. There are no pathways for impact on setting due to the inherent shielding from vegetation. 2016 Baigens Medium This heritage asset is situated n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible within 500m of a Construction Change Logistics Hub. There are no

Page 429 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation pathways for impact on setting due to the inherent shielding, particularly in relation to the A31 which separates this heritage asset from the Construction Logistics 2017 Pound Medium This heritage asset is situated n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Farmhouse within 500m of a Construction Change Logistics Hub. There are no pathways for impact on setting due to the inherent shielding, particularly in relation to the A31 which separates this heritage asset from the Construction Logistics 2018 Thatch Medium This heritage asset is situated n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Cottage within 500m of a Construction Change Logistics Hub. There are no pathways for impact on setting due to the inherent shielding, particularly in relation to the A31 which separates this heritage asset from the Construction Logistics HLT84 Bramdean High No physical impacts to this HLT n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible House are predicted. There are no impact Change pathways for noise or visual intrusion due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this HLT. HLT88 Bury Court Low No physical impacts to this HLT n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible are predicted. There are no impact Change pathways for noise or visual intrusion due to the distance and

Page 430 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation inherent shielding between the project and this HLT. HLT92 St Michaels Medium No physical impacts to this HLT n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Abbey are predicted. This HLT is Change bounded to the north by a railway line, to the west by the A325, and to the east by a railway line and the A331. This HLT therefore experiences visual and noise intrusion from the railway and urba HLT94 Frimley Park High No physical impacts to this HLT n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible are predicted. There are no impact Change pathways for noise or visual intrusion due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this HLT. HLT95 Bagshot Park High No physical impacts to this HLT n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible are predicted. There are no impact Change pathways for noise or visual intrusion due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this HLT. HLT96 Westcroft Low No physical impacts to this HLT n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Park, are predicted. There are no impact Change Chobham pathways for noise or visual intrusion due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this HLT. HLT97 Chobham Low No physical impacts to this HLT n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Place are predicted. There are no impact Change pathways for noise and visual intrusion due to the distance and

Page 431 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation inherent shielding between the project and this HLT. HLT99 Fan Court, Low This HLT is no longer extant as a n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible Longcross whole and the surviving historic Change Road, landscape elements of this HLT Chertsey are considered to be mostly unrelated physically to each other. No physical impacts to this HLT are predicted. There are no impact pathways for noise and vis HLT107 Wintershill Hall Unknown No physical impacts to this HLT n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible are predicted. This HLT is Change bordered by treed vegetation and is well shielded from the Order Limits and there are therefore no impact pathways for noise or visual intrusion. HLT109 St Ann's Court High No physical impacts to this HLT n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible are predicted. There are no impact Change pathways for noise or visual intrusion due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this HLT. HLT110 Froyle House Low No physical impacts to this HLT n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible HLT are predicted. There are no impact Change pathways for noise or visual intrusion due to the distance and inherent shielding between the project and this HLT. HLT112 Scattered Medium This HLT is situated within 500m n/a No Change Negligible None Proposed No Negligible settlement with of a Construction Logistics Hub. Change paddocks pre- No physical impacts to this HLT 1811 extent are predicted and there are no

Page 432 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Construction Impact of Effect Measures or Magnitude Significance Duration Mitigation pathways for noise or visual intrusion due to the inherent shielding from vegetation.

Page 433 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

1.2 Operation

1.2.1 Effects on the historic landscape sub-topic during operation has been scoped out of the assessment (see Section 9.2 in Chapter 9 of the ES).

1.2.2 No historic buildings or archaeological remains have been assessed as having a significant effect during operation.

1.2.3 Table 1.4 outlines potential impacts to historic buildings and archaeological remains which would result in a minor or negligible significance of effect, i.e. no significant effects in EIA terms, prior to good practice measures during operation.

1.2.4 All other historic buildings and all archaeological remains have been assessed as having no impact prior to good practice measures during operation. This is most often due to the limited contribution that setting has on the value of many below-ground archaeological remains and the inherent distance and/or shielding between the heritage assets and the project.

Table 1.4 Historic Buildings and Archaeological Remains with Potential Impacts Resulting in No Significant Effects Prior to Good Practice Measures During Operation Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Operation Impact of Effect Measures Magnitude Significance Duration 53 Granary 5M Medium This heritage asset is situated over Permanent Minor Minor None Proposed Minor Minor South Of 200m to the south of the proposed Adverse Adverse Netherhill pigging station at Boorley Green. House Although the historic building and the valve location are both bordered by vegetation, this valve location may be partially visible from this location and there is the potential for a change to the setting of the historic building such that it is noticeably changed. 54 Netherhill Medium This heritage asset is situated over Permanent Minor Minor None Proposed Minor Minor House 200m to the south of the proposed Adverse Adverse pigging station at Boorley Green. Although the historic building and the valve location are both

Page 434 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Operation Impact of Effect Measures Magnitude Significance Duration bordered by vegetation, this valve location may be partially visible from this location and there is the potential for a change to the setting of the historic building such that it is noticeably changed. 72 Cross Lane Medium This heritage asset is situated over Permanent Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Cottage 150m to the south of Valve 2 at Cross Lane. Although the historic building is shielded by vegetation and a neighbouring building, this valve location may be partially visible from this location and there is the potential for a slight change to the setting of the historic building that hardly affects it. 639 Saddling Medium This heritage asset is situated over Permanent Minor Minor None Proposed Minor Minor Stables To 125m to the southeast of Valve 8 at Adverse Adverse West Of The Tweseldown Racecourse. This Road At valve location may be visible from Tweseldown this heritage asset and there is the Racecourse potential for a change to the setting of the historic building such that it is noticeably changed. This would not affect the value of this heritage asset. 640 Saddling Medium This heritage asset is situated over Permanent Minor Minor None Proposed Minor Minor Stables To 150m to the southeast of Valve 8 at Adverse Adverse East Of The Tweseldown Racecourse. This Road At valve location may be visible from Tweseldown this heritage asset and there is the Racecourse potential for a change to the setting of the historic building such that it is noticeably changed. This would not

Page 435 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Operation Impact of Effect Measures Magnitude Significance Duration affect the value of this heritage asset. 641 Hay Barn At Medium This heritage asset is situated over Permanent Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Tweseldown 150m to the southeast of Valve 8 at Racecourse Tweseldown Racecourse. This historic building is partially shielded by the neighbouring building; however, this valve location may be visible from this heritage asset and there is the potential for a slight change to the setting of the historic building that would hardly affect it. This would not affect the value of this heritage asset. 642 Offices At Medium This heritage asset is situated over Permanent Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Tweseldown 150m to the southeast of Valve 8 at Racecourse Tweseldown Racecourse. This historic building is partially shielded by the neighbouring building; however, this valve location may be visible from this heritage asset and there is the potential for a slight change to the setting of the historic building that would hardly affect it. This would not affect the value of this heritage asset. 643 Grandstand Medium This heritage asset is situated over Permanent Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible & Jockey 150m to the southeast of Valve 8 at Quaters At Tweseldown Racecourse. This Tweseldown historic building is well shielded by Racecourse the neighbouring building; however, this valve location may be visible from this heritage asset and there is the potential for a slight change to

Page 436 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Operation Impact of Effect Measures Magnitude Significance Duration the setting of the historic building that would hardly affect it. This would not affect the value of this heritage asset. 644 Underpass Medium This heritage asset is situated over Permanent Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible At 200m to the east of Valve 8 at Tweseldown Tweseldown Racecourse. This Racecourse historic building is well shielded by fencing and vegetation; however, this valve location may be partially visible from this heritage asset and there is the potential for a slight change to the setting of the historic building that hardly affects it. 646 Basingstoke Medium There is the potential for pipeline Permanent Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Canal markers to be visible from this heritage asset. The small size of the marker posts and the inherent shielding of the heritage asset by current infrastructure indicates the potential for a slight change to the setting of the historic building that hardly affects it. 676 Main High There is the potential for pipeline Permanent Negligible Minor None Proposed Negligible Minor Building To markers to be visible from this Adverse Adverse Farnborough heritage asset. The small size of Hill Convent the marker posts indicates the potential for a slight change to the historic building that would hardly affect it. 830 The Old Medium This heritage asset is situated over Permanent Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Cottage In 150m west of Valve 12 at Steep The Hill. This historic building is Grounds Of shielded by vegetation and

Page 437 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Operation Impact of Effect Measures Magnitude Significance Duration Frogshole neighbouring buildings; however, Cottage this valve location may be visible from this heritage asset and there is the potential for a slight change to the setting of the historic building that would hardly affect it. 843 Home Farm Medium This heritage asset is situated Permanent Minor Minor None Proposed Minor Minor approximately 75m east of Valve 12 Adverse Adverse at Steep Hill. This historic building is shielded by vegetation and neighbouring buildings; however, this valve location may be visible from this heritage asset and there is the potential for a change to the setting of the historic building such that it is noticeably changed. This would not affect the value of this heritage asset. 943 Pannells Low This heritage asset is situated Permanent Minor Negligible None Proposed Minor Negligible Farm approximately 90m north of Valve 13 at Pannells Farm (M25 Crossing). This heritage asset is well shielded by vegetation; however, there is the potential for this valve location to be partially visible from this heritage asset and there is the potential for a change to the setting of the historic building such that it is noticeably changed. This would not affect the value of this heritage asset. 1080 Welsh Medium There is the potential for pipeline Permanent Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible School markers to be visible from this heritage asset. The small size of

Page 438 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Operation Impact of Effect Measures Magnitude Significance Duration the marker posts indicates the potential for a slight change to the historic building that would hardly affect it. 1082 Chapel At Medium There is the potential for pipeline Permanent Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Welsh markers to be visible from this School heritage asset. The small size of the marker posts indicates the potential for a slight change to the historic building that would hardly affect it. 1325 Basingstoke Medium There is the potential for pipeline Permanent Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Canal markers to be visible from this heritage asset. The small size of the marker posts and the inherent shielding of the heritage asset by current infrastructure indicates the potential for a slight change to the Conservation Area that hardly affects it. 1343 Farnborough Medium There is the potential for pipeline Permanent Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Hill, markers to be visible from this Hampshire heritage asset. The small size of County the marker posts indicates the Council potential for a slight change to the Conservation Area that would hardly affect it. 1344 Farnborough Medium There is the potential for pipeline Permanent Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Hill, markers to be visible from this Rushmoor heritage asset. The small size of Borough the marker posts indicates the Council potential for a slight change to the

Page 439 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

Asset Site Name Value Potential Impact Description - Potential Magnitude Significance Good Practice Residual Residual Number Operation Impact of Effect Measures Magnitude Significance Duration Conservation Area that would hardly affect it. 1892 Frimley Low This heritage asset is situated over Permanent Negligible Negligible None Proposed Negligible Negligible Church Of 200m to the south of Valve 10 at England Frimley Green Road. This historic Primary building is well shielded by School neighbouring properties and vegetation; however, this valve location may be partially visible from this heritage asset and there is the potential for a slight change to the setting of the historic building that hardly affects it.

Page 440 of Appendix 9.4 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 9.4: Potential Effects on the Historic Environment

(This page is intentionally blank)

Page 441 of Appendix 9.4