DOCSLIB.ORG

Durham County Council

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Durham County Council County Durham Local Development Framework Technical Consultation Report Identifying Mineral Safeguarding Areas & Safeguarding Mineral handling, Processing and Transportation Infrastructure in County Durham Publication date: 10 July 2009 Contents Page 1.0 Introduction 3 2.0 How to comment? 3 3.0 Background Information 3 What are Mineral Safeguarding Areas? 4 How do MSAs relate to existing Mineral Consultation Areas? 4 What approach has been taken in Neighbouring Local Authority areas? 5 4.0 Consultation Questions 6 What information should we use to define Mineral Safeguarding Areas? 6 Refining the boundaries 6 What minerals found in County Durham are or may become of economic 8 importance? Vein Minerals 9 5.0 Proposed Approach to safeguarding economically important 9 minerals. Magnesian Limestone and Dolomite. 10 Carboniferous Limestone. 14 Igneous Rock (Dolerite) 17 Sand and Gravel (Fluvial and Glacial) 19 Permian Yellow Sands (Basal Permian Sands) 23 Silica Sand (Moulding Sand) 24 Natural Building and Roofing Stone 26 Brick making raw materials 28 Coal (opencast coal) 31 6.0 Other matters. 34 Safeguarding railheads, wharfage and associated storage, handling, 34 processing facilities for the bulk transport of minerals Concrete batching, the manufacture of coated materials, other concrete 35 products List of Figures Figure 1 Magnesian Limestone 10 Figure 2 Magnesian Limestone Options 12 Figure 3 Minerals Local Plan - High Grade Dolomite Reserve 13 Figure 4 Carboniferous limestone 14 Figure 5 Carboniferous Limestone Options 15 Figure 6 Igneous 17 Figure 7 Igneous Options 18 Figure 8 Sand and gravel 19 Figure 9 Sand and Gravel Option A 21 Figure 10 Sand and Gravel Option B 21 Figure 11 Sand and Gravel Option C 22 Figure 12 Permian Yellow Sands Options 24 Figure 13 Silica Sand Options 25 Figure 14 Namurian Sandstone in County Durham 26 Figure 15 Natural Building and Roofing Stone Sites in County Durham 28 Figure 16 Brick Making Options 30 Figure 17 Principal and Subsidiary Coal Resource Areas 31 Figure 18 Open Cast Coal Option A 33 Figure 19 Open Cast Coal Option B 33 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 This reporti has been prepared in order to consult key minerals related stakeholders on our approach to safeguarding: 1. economically important minerals, (see section 3 to 5); 2. existing, planned and potential railheads, wharfage and associated storage, handling, processing facilities for the bulk transport of minerals (see section 6); and 3. existing, planned and potential sites (including rail and water served) for concrete batching, the manufacture of coated materials, other concrete products and the handling, processing and distribution of substitute, recycled and secondary aggregate material, (see section 6). The safeguarding of mineral resources and these mineral transport, processing and handling facilities are a key requirement of Minerals Policy Statement 1 (MPS1) ‘Planning and Minerals’ (paragraph 13 of MPS1). In addition the report specifically requests that the minerals industry and other interested parties provide information to help the Council to identify and refine the boundaries of minerals safeguarding areas (MSAs). 1.2 Given the specialist nature of this subject the consultation report is being targeted at the minerals industry and their trade organisations. However, once draft MSAs and other safeguarded facilities have been identified in association with the minerals industry, wider consultation will occur. Please note as a technical consultation report, the report unavoidably contains detailed technical information relating to the geology of County Durham and both current and historic mineral working. 2.0 HOW TO COMMENT? 2.1 Comments and suggestions relating to our approach to minerals safeguarding and which areas should be safeguarded can be made by letter to the address below, or by email to: [email protected]. Our postal address where responses should be sent to is: Minerals Safeguarding Areas’ Consultation Planning Policy Team, Room 4/121 Regeneration and Economic Development Durham County Council County Hall Durham DH1 5UQ 2.2 We would welcome your comments by no later than Friday 11 September 2009. 2.3 If you wish to discuss this matter or arrange a meeting with planning officers, please contact either Jason McKewon (0191 383 3071) or Rick Long (0191 383 3774). 3.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION 3.1 From the 1 April 2009 a new Unitary Council was created for County Durham. The new Unitary Durham County Council is required to prepare a county-wide Local Development Framework (LDF). The new LDF will include a number of spatial planning documents, including a Core Strategy Development Plan Document (DPD), which will set out the i Please note a significant proportion of the information in this consultation report draws directly from the British Geological Survey (BGS) report, ‘Mineral Resource Information for Development Plans ‘Durham and the Tees Valley: Resources and Constraints’, Technical Report WF/00/6, British Geological Survey/Department of Environment Transport and Regions, 2000. 3 Council's spatial planning policies and proposals for all types of development including minerals and waste. What are Mineral Safeguarding Areas? 3.2 MSAs are a new planning designation which must be identified and included on Local Development Framework (LDF) Proposals Maps. The intent of MSAs is to safeguard proven deposits of minerals which are, or may become of economic importance within the foreseeable future, from unnecessary sterilisation by surface development. Unlike other mineral planning designations which allocate land for development i.e. Site Specific Allocations, Preferred Areas or Areas of Search, where there is a varying degree of presumption that extraction may be appropriate, Government guidance is clear that there is no presumption that resources defined in MSAs will be worked. 3.3 It is very important that the minerals industry and their trade organisations are involved and provide their views on how MSAs are designated. This is because, once they are designated MSAs will enable safeguarding to be a material consideration and provide land which does not have planning permission for mineral working, but which is underlain with economically important mineral resources, some protection from sterilisation. Similarly, where MSAs are designated around existing mineral sites or potential mineral site allocations, safeguarding will be a material consideration with the presumption being that such areas should be protected from sterilisation. 3.4 Government guidance states that new planning documents should not normally include policies and proposals for non-minerals development e.g. new residential development, in MSAs, or other sensitive developments around safeguarded mineral areas, where such policies would affect the potential for future extraction of minerals. However, it may be appropriate to develop policies for prior extraction of minerals, where practicable, within safeguarded areas: for example extraction before non-mineral development takes place subject to safeguards to protect the environment and amenity of local communities. This is the current approach of the County Durham Minerals Local Plan, (see Policy M15 of the County Durham Minerals Local Plan). How do MSA’s relate to existing Mineral Consultation Areas? 3.5 Mineral Consultation Areas (MCAs) have previously been designated by the County Council in the adopted County Durham Minerals Local Plan (December 2000). The current MCA's provide a mechanism which allowed the former District Councils to consult the County Council on certain types of planning applications for non-mineral developments within the boundary of a MCA, and which would be likely to affect the winning and working of minerals. 3.6 Once defined and shown on the Council’s new LDF proposals map, MSAs will replace the MCAs in the existing Minerals Local Plan. Further information on MSAs and MCAs is set out in • Minerals Policy Statement 1 (MPS1) 'Planning & Minerals (CLG), November 2006, • Planning and Minerals Practice Guide (CLG), November 2006; and • A Guide to Minerals Safeguarding in England, British Geological Survey/CLG, October 2007. 4 What approach has been taken in neighbouring Local Authority Areas? 3.7 Before considering the County Council’s emerging approach it may be useful to consider the scope of progress in adjoining planning authorities. To date very limited work has been undertaken by other planning authorities in the North East of England. Only Northumberland County Council has progressed MSAs to an advanced stage. The Northumberland County Council Minerals and Waste Development Plan Documents which were submitted to the Secretary of State in June 2007 included extensive MSAs for whinstone, sand and gravel, limestone and coal (with associated clays). Unfortunately, these areas have not progressed beyond the submission stage due to the withdrawal of these documents on grounds unrelated to safeguarding prior to the planned Examination. Further work on MSAs is planned by Northumberland County Council during 2009. 3.8 In terms of the Tyne & Wear Unitary authorities the most advanced work on MSAs is by Sunderland City Council. The City Council’s Core Strategy Preferred Options Report (December 2007) included a policy on MSAs (CS18). This policy indicated that MSAs will be defined around mineral deposits that are considered to be of current or future economic importance in the broad locations of Eppleton, Great Eppleton, Pittington Hill and Springwell
Recommended publications
  • Here Were a Number of Bright Sparks from the Year

    Here Were a Number of Bright Sparks from the Year

    NORTH EAST ENGLAND BRANCH BUTTERFLY CONSERVATION BUTTERFLY SUMMARY 2017 North East England C ompiled by Michael Perkins, Ian J Waller, & Roger Norman B utterfly Conservation CONTENTS Page number Contents Page ................................................................... Inside front cover Recorders’ Review ........................................................................................ 3 Weather Summary ........................................................................................ 5 Species Accounts: 2017............................................................................... 7 Dingy Skipper Erynnis tages ...................................................................... 8 Small Skipper Thymelicus sylvestris .......................................................... 9 Essex Skipper Thymelicus lineola............................................................ 10 Large Skipper Ochlodes sylvanus ............................................................ 10 Orange-tip Anthocharis cardamines ......................................................... 12 Large White Pieris brassicae .................................................................... 13 Small White Pieris rapae .......................................................................... 14 Green-veined White Pieris napi ................................................................ 15 Clouded Yellow Colias croceus ................................................................ 16 Brimstone Gonepteryx rhamni .................................................................
  • Durham Rare Plant Register 2011 Covering VC66 and the Teesdale Part of VC65

    Durham Rare Plant Register 2011 Covering VC66 and the Teesdale Part of VC65

    Durham Rare Plant Register 2011 Covering VC66 and the Teesdale part of VC65 JOHN L. DURKIN MSc. MIEEM BSBI Recorder for County Durham 25 May Avenue. Winlaton Mill, Blaydon, NE21 6SF [email protected] Contents Introduction to the rare plants register Notes on plant distribution and protection The individual species accounts in alphabetical order Site Index First published 2010. This is the 2011, second edition. Improvements in the 2011 edition include- An additional 10% records, most of these more recent and more precise. One kilometre resolution maps for upland and coastal species. My thanks to Bob Ellis for advice on mapping. The ―County Scarce‖ species are now incorporated into the main text. Hieracium is now included. This edition is ―regionally aligned‖, that is, several species which are county rare in Northumberland, but were narrowly rejected for the Durham first edition, are now included. There is now a site index. Cover picture—Dark Red Helleborine at Bishop Middleham Quarry, its premier British site. Introduction Many counties are in the process of compiling a County Rare Plant Register, to assist in the study and conservation of their rare species. The process is made easier if the county has a published Flora and a strong Biological Records Centre, and Durham is fortunate to have Gordon Graham's Flora and the Durham Wildlife Trust‘s ―Recorder" system. We also have a Biodiversity project, based at Rainton Meadows, to carry out conservation projects to protect the rare species. The purpose of this document is to introduce the Rare Plant Register and to give an account of the information that it holds, and the species to be included.
  • On the Breccia Gashes of the Durham Coast. Lebour.G.A

    On the Breccia Gashes of the Durham Coast. Lebour.G.A

    Durham E-Theses Some aspects of the geomorphology of the Durham coast Westgate, W. A. How to cite: Westgate, W. A. (1957) Some aspects of the geomorphology of the Durham coast, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/8519/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. SOME ASPECTS OF THE G-EOMQRPHOLO GY OP THE DUHHAM COAST W.A. Westgate, B.Sc. Submitted for the Degree of Ph.D. in the University of Durham. February, 1957. Itmm?, not ** > \ i3i (i) This research was carried out whilst I was in receipt of a Nature Conservancy Research Studentship "between July 1953 and July 1955.
  • Bedrock Aquifer

    Bedrock Aquifer

    395052 525125 Ref: FIND-65938 Your ref: G20272 Grid ref: 395052 525125 Bedrock aquifer Site Outline Search buffers in metres (m) Principal Secondary A Secondary B Secondary Undifferentiated Unproductive © Crown copyright and database rights 2020. Ordnance Survey licence 100035207 6.2 Bedrock aquifer Records within 500m 6 Aquifer status of groundwater held within bedrock geology. Features are displayed on the Bedrock aquifer map on page 43 ID Location Designation Description 1 On site Secondary A Permeable layers capable of supporting water supplies at a local rather than strategic scale, and in some cases forming an important source of base flow to rivers. These are generally aquifers formerly classified as minor aquifers 2 On site Secondary A Permeable layers capable of supporting water supplies at a local rather than strategic scale, and in some cases forming an important source of base flow to rivers. These are generally aquifers formerly classified as minor aquifers Contact us with any questions at: Date: 12 August 2020 [email protected] 43 HOME 08444 159 000 395052 525125 Ref: FIND-65938 Your ref: G20272 Grid ref: 395052 525125 ID Location Designation Description 3 78m S Secondary A Permeable layers capable of supporting water supplies at a local rather than strategic scale, and in some cases forming an important source of base flow to rivers. These are generally aquifers formerly classified as minor aquifers 4 89m S Secondary A Permeable layers capable of supporting water supplies at a local rather than strategic scale, and in some cases forming an important source of base flow to rivers. These are generally aquifers formerly classified as minor aquifers 5 434m SW Secondary B Predominantly lower permeability layers which may store/yield limited amounts of groundwater due to localised features such as fissures, thin permeablehorizons and weathering.
  • County Durham Plan (Adopted 2020)

    County Durham Plan (Adopted 2020)

    County Durham Plan ADOPTED 2020 Contents Foreword 5 1 Introduction 7 Neighbourhood Plans 7 Assessing Impacts 8 Duty to Cooperate: Cross-Boundary Issues 9 County Durham Plan Key Diagram and Monitoring 10 2 What the County Durham Plan is Seeking to Achieve 11 3 Vision and Objectives 14 Delivering Sustainable Development 18 4 How Much Development and Where 20 Quantity of Development (How Much) 20 Spatial Distribution of Development (Where) 29 5 Core Principles 71 Building a Strong Competitive Economy 71 Ensuring the Vitality of Town Centres 78 Supporting a Prosperous Rural Economy 85 Delivering a Wide Choice of High Quality Homes 98 Protecting Green Belt Land 124 Sustainable Transport 127 Supporting High Quality Infrastructure 138 Requiring Good Design 150 Promoting Healthy Communities 158 Meeting the Challenge of Climate Change, Flooding and Coastal Change 167 Conserving and Enhancing the Natural and Historic Environment 185 Minerals and Waste 212 Appendices A Strategic Policies 259 B Table of Superseded Policies 261 C Coal Mining Risk Assessments, Minerals Assessments and Minerals and/or Waste 262 Infrastructure Assessment D Safeguarding Mineral Resources and Safeguarded Minerals and Waste Sites 270 E Glossary of Terms 279 CDP Adopted Version 2020 Contents List of County Durham Plan Policies Policy 1 Quantity of New Development 20 Policy 2 Employment Land 30 Policy 3 Aykley Heads 38 Policy 4 Housing Allocations 47 Policy 5 Durham City's Sustainable Urban Extensions 61 Policy 6 Development on Unallocated Sites 68 Policy 7 Visitor Attractions
  • Wildlife Guide Introduction

    Wildlife Guide Introduction

    Heritage Coast Sunderland Durham Hartlepool Coastal wildlife guide Introduction Our coastline is a nature explorer’s dream. With dramatic views along the coastline and out across the North Sea, it has unique qualities which come from its underlying geology, its natural vegetation and the influences of the sea. It is a wonderfully varied coastline of shallow bays and headlands with yellow limestone cliffs up to 30 metres high. The coastal slopes and grasslands are home to a fabulous array of wild flowers and insects, in contrast the wooded coastal denes are a mysterious landscape of tangled trees, roe deer and woodland birds. This guide shows a small selection of some the fascinating features and wildlife you may see on your visit to our coast; from Hendon in the north to Hartlepool Headland in the south, there is always something interesting to see, whatever the time of year. Scan the code to find out more about Durham Heritage Coast. Contents 4 Birds 9 Insects 13 Marine Mammals 16 Pebbles 20 Plants 25 Sand Dunes 29 Seashore The coast is a great place to see birds. In the autumn and spring lots of different types of passage migrant birds can be seen. The UK's birds can be split in to three categories of conservation importance - red, amber and green. Red is the highest conservation priority, with species needing urgent action. Amber is the next most critical group, followed by green. The colour is shown next to the image. Please keep your dogs on a lead to avoid disturbance to ground nesting birds in the summer and also over wintering birds.
  • Newcastle City Council Geodiversity Audit

    Newcastle City Council Geodiversity Audit

    Newcastle City Council Geodiversity Audit November 2019 Hulam Consulting Version control Version Date Author Notes 0.1 28 July 2019 Alistair Bowden First draft 1.0 31 July 2019 Alistair Bowden Version 1.0 approved by Kelly Graham 31/7/19 1.2-IJ 18 November Ian Jackson Draft changes following new Local Geological 2019 Site designations. 1.3-DAT 20 November Derek Teasdale Further draft changes following new Local 2019 Geological Site designations. 2.0 23 November Alistair Bowden, Ian Jackson Updated version containing the improvements 2019 and Derek Teasdale made by IJ (v1.2) and DAT (v1.3) 2.1 25 November Alistair Bowden, Ian Jackson Addition of BGS maps to references and one 2019 and Derek Teasdale tiny amendment 2.2 28 November Alistair Bowden, Ian Jackson Addition of site reports as appendices and 2019 and Derek Teasdale making specific mention of sites in the main body of text. 2 Contents 1 Introduction 4 1.1 What is a Geodiversity Audit? 4 1.2 A brief introduction to geological time 4 1.3 Brief overview of the area 6 2 Solid geology: Basement rock structure 8 3 Solid geology: Carboniferous Coal Measures 11 3.1 The Lower, Middle and Upper Coal Measures 14 3.2 Depositional environments 15 4 Solid geology: Igneous rock 19 5 Quaternary geology 21 5.1 The Pre-glacial landscape 21 5.2 The Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) 24 5.3 Ice sheet retreat 25 5.4 Post-glacial (Holocene) deposits 28 6 Human impact on the landscape 29 7 Glossary 31 8 References 32 9 Appendices – Site reports 35 3 1.
  • Raisby Hill Quarry SSSI Notification Document 18 October 2019

    Raisby Hill Quarry SSSI Notification Document 18 October 2019

    Raisby Hill Quarry SSSI Durham Notifications under sections 28A, 28B and 28D of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 Issued by Natural England’s Northumbria Team on 18 October 2019 Contact points and further information This notification document is issued by Natural England’s Northumbria Team. Our address for correspondence is: Natural England Northumbria Team Lancaster House Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 7YH Telephone number: 0208 026 5354 E-mail: [email protected] Citizen Space: https://consult.defra.gov.uk/natural-england/raisby-hill-quarry Your contact point for enquiries relating to this notification is Jenny Loring A second document (Raisby Hill Quarry SSSI - supporting information) is available on request from the address above. This contains information and extracts from relevant documents that have been used in the decision to modify the notification of this SSSI. The date of the modifications to the notification of Raisby Hill Quarry SSSI is 18 October 2019 Page 2 of 23 Contents 1. Summary ............................................................................................................. 4 2. The legal background .......................................................................................... 5 3. Making representations ....................................................................................... 6 4. Reasons for notification ....................................................................................... 7 5. Reasons for the notification of additional land under section 28B
  • Limestone Landscapes: a Geodiversity Audit and Action Plan for The

    Limestone Landscapes: a Geodiversity Audit and Action Plan for The

    Limestone Landscapes - a geodiversity audit and action plan for the Durham Magnesian Limestone Plateau Geology and Landscape England Programme Open Report OR/09/007 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGY AND LANDSCAPE ENGLAND PROGRAMME OPEN REPORT OR/09/007 Limestone Landscapes - a geodiversity audit and action The National Grid and other Ordnance Survey data are used plan for the Durham Magnesian with the permission of the Con- troller of Her Majesty’s Station- ery Office. Limestone Plateau Licence No: 100017897/ 2009. Keywords geodiversity, Durham, Permian, D J D Lawrence Limestone, Landscape. National Grid Reference Editor SW corner 429800,521000 Centre point 438000,544000 A H Cooper NE corner 453400,568000 Front cover The Magnesian Limestone at Marsden Bay Bibliographical reference LAWRENCE, D J D. 2009. Limestone Landscapes - a geodiversity audit and action plan for the Durham Magnesian Limestone Plateau. British Geological Survey Open Report, OR/09/007. 114pp. Copyright in materials derived from the British Geological Survey’s work is owned by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and/or the authority that commissioned the work. You may not copy or adapt this publication without first obtaining permission. Contact the BGS Intellectual Property Rights Section, British Geological Sur- vey, Keyworth, E-mail [email protected]. You may quote extracts of a reasonable length without prior permission, provided a full acknowledgement is given of the source of the extract. Maps and diagrams in this book use topography based on Ord- nance
  • NTS TARMAC Review of Old Mineral Permissions, Hawthorn Quarry

    NTS TARMAC Review of Old Mineral Permissions, Hawthorn Quarry

    Wardell Armstrong LLP City Quadrant, 11 Waterloo Square, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4DP, United Kingdom Telephone: +44 (0)191 232 0943 Facsimile: +44 (0)191 261 1572 www.wardell-armstrong.com DATE ISSUED: October 2017 JOB NUMBER: NT12149 REPORT NUMBER: NTS TARMAC Review of Old Mineral Permissions, Hawthorn Quarry Non-Technical Summary October 2017 PREPARED BY: Rachel Graham Environmental Scientist Gillian Beauchamp Associate Director APPROVED BY: Helen Kennedy Technical Director This report has been prepared by Wardell Armstrong LLP with all reasonable skill, care and diligence, within the terms of the Contract with the Client. The report is confidential to the Client and Wardell Armstrong LLP accepts no responsibility of whatever nature to third parties to whom this report may be made known. No part of this document may be reproduced without the prior written approval of Wardell Armstrong LLP. ENERGY AND CLIMATE CHANGE ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE AND UTILITIES LAND AND PROPERTY Wardell Armstrong is the trading name of Wardell Armstrong LLP, Registered in England No. OC307138. MINING AND MINERAL PROCESSING Registered office: Sir Henry Doulton House, Forge Lane, Etruria, Stoke-on-Trent, ST1 5BD, United Kingdom MINERAL ESTATES UK Offices: Stoke-on-Trent, Birmingham, Cardiff, Carlisle, Croydon, Edinburgh, Glasgow, Greater Manchester, Central Manchester London, Newcastle upon Tyne, Sheffield, Taunton, Truro. International Offices: Almaty, Moscow WASTE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT TARMAC Review of Old Mineral Permissions, Hawthorn Quarry
  • Durham City Local Plan

    Durham City Local Plan

    CITY OF DURHAM - LOCAL PLAN ADOPTED PLAN WRITTEN STATEMENT (As amended by the Secretary of State’s Direction under paragraph 1(3) of Schedule 8 to the Planning & Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 in respect of saved policies at 27 th September 2007) Mr D Thornborrow, Head of Planning Services City of Durham Council, 17 Claypath, Durham, DH1 1RH 19 th May 2004 City of Durham Local Plan - May 2004 2 City of Durham Local Plan - May 2004 FOREWORD The Council’s vision for the People and City of Durham is of Flourishing Communities and Durham as a Capital City. Twenty-six villages and a town with its very different constituent parts, make up the District of Durham. Each one of these parts of our whole has different histories, characteristics, aspirations and needs which must be respected so that they can all flourish. The Local Plan provides the framework within which growth, change and new opportunities can develop. Durham is uniquely special, offering us a good place to live, to shop and to visit, as well as being the driver of economic development, not only for the whole of the District but also throughout the Region. Our World Heritage site and nationally renowned University give us important assets on which to build to achieve economic well being and secure our futures. This Plan must protect and enhance what is good, and improve and evolve Durham where desirable, and ensure that our best assets continue to improve all our lives. The City of Durham Local Plan, which replaces the 1988 Local Plan, sets out a land use policy framework that will guide new development over the period to 2006, its two core aims intend to express this vision.
  • Green Infrastructure Implementation Plans Introduction 1

    Green Infrastructure Implementation Plans Introduction 1

    Contents Region 1 Introduction 3 2 Durham Magnesian Limestone Plateau 10 2.1 General comments about the area 10 2.2 Landscape 11 2.3 open spaces 12 2.4 Flood risk and water quality 14 2.5 Ecology 16 3 Seaham 20 4 Peterlee 28 5 Secondary and tertiary settlements 36 5.1 Blackhall 36 5.2 Chilton 38 5.3 Easington 40 5.4 Ferryhill 44 5.5 Fishburn 47 5.6 Murton 49 5.7 Shotton 51 5.8 Thornley and Wheatley Hill 53 5.9 Wingate 57 Green Infrastructure Implementation Plans Introduction 1 Green Infrastructure Implementation Plans 2 Introduction 1 Green Infrastructure Implementation Plans 1.1 The GI Implementation Plans are intended to translate the recommendations of the Durham County Council Green Infrastructure Strategy (2012) into actions. They will achieve this by: Detailed analysis of environmental qualities and issues, taking into consideration studies carried out by the Council and its partners, such as the Environment Agency, Natural England and neighbouring authorities Identification of priorities and mitigation/ amelioration measures, either as general objectives or, where appropriate, as specific projects Discussion of planned development in the County in the period covered by the forthcoming County Durham Plan (until 2030); suggesting, for each allocated development site, how green infrastructure might be incorporated within the site, and what improvements should be made to the quantity, quality and management of green infrastructure in the area. Structure of the Implementation Plans 1.2 Because the County is large and diverse, some form of breakdown is required in order to make meaningful locationally-specific recommendations.