DOCSLIB.ORG

UQ272429 OA.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UQ272429 OA.Pdf Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Oral antihistamine-decongestant-analgesic combinations for the common cold (Review) De Sutter AIM, van Driel ML, Kumar AA, Lesslar O, Skrt A De Sutter AIM, van Driel ML, Kumar AA, Lesslar O, Skrt A. Oral antihistamine-decongestant-analgesic combinations for the common cold. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD004976. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004976.pub3. www.cochranelibrary.com Oral antihistamine-decongestant-analgesic combinations for the common cold (Review) Copyright © 2012 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. TABLE OF CONTENTS HEADER....................................... 1 ABSTRACT ...................................... 1 PLAINLANGUAGESUMMARY . 2 BACKGROUND .................................... 3 OBJECTIVES ..................................... 3 METHODS ...................................... 4 RESULTS....................................... 5 Figure1. ..................................... 7 Figure2. ..................................... 8 DISCUSSION ..................................... 19 AUTHORS’CONCLUSIONS . 20 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . 20 REFERENCES ..................................... 21 CHARACTERISTICSOFSTUDIES . 24 DATAANDANALYSES. 64 Analysis 1.1. Comparison 1 Combination 1: Antihistamine-decongestant, Outcome 1 Global evaluation. 66 Analysis 1.2. Comparison 1 Combination 1: Antihistamine-decongestant, Outcome 2 Side effects: all - Combination 1: Antihistamine-decongestant. 67 Analysis 1.3. Comparison 1 Combination 1: Antihistamine-decongestant, Outcome 3 Side effects: drowsiness, hypersomnia and excessive sleepiness - Combination 1: Antihistamine-decongestant. 68 Analysis 1.4. Comparison 1 Combination 1: Antihistamine-decongestant, Outcome 4 Side effects: dry mouth - Combination 1: Antihistamine-decongestant. .......... 69 Analysis 1.5. Comparison 1 Combination 1: Antihistamine-decongestant, Outcome 5 Side effects: insomnia. 70 Analysis 1.6. Comparison 1 Combination 1: Antihistamine-decongestant, Outcome 6 Side effects: gastro-intestinal upset - Combination 1: Antihistamine + analgesic. ......... 70 Analysis 2.1. Comparison 2 Combination 2: Antihistamine-analgesic, Outcome 1 Global evaluation: Koychev 2003. 71 Analysis 2.2. Comparison 2 Combination 2: Antihistamine-analgesic, Outcome 2 Global evaluation: Middleton 1981 night. .................................... 72 Analysis 2.3. Comparison 2 Combination 2: Antihistamine-analgesic, Outcome 3 Side effects: drowsiness, hypersomnia and excessive sleepiness - Combination 2 : Antihistamine-analgesic. ............... 72 Analysis 2.4. Comparison 2 Combination 2: Antihistamine-analgesic, Outcome 4 Side effects: all - Combination 2: Antihistamine-analgesic. 73 Analysis 3.1. Comparison 3 Combination 3: Analgesic-decongestants, Outcome 1 Global evaluation. 73 Analysis 3.2. Comparison 3 Combination 3: Analgesic-decongestants, Outcome 2 Side effects: drowsiness, hypersomnia, lethargy and excessive sleepiness - Combination 3: Analgesic-decongestant. 74 Analysis 3.3. Comparison 3 Combination 3: Analgesic-decongestants, Outcome 3 Side effects: dry mouth - Combination 3:Analgesic-decongestant. 75 Analysis 3.4. Comparison 3 Combination 3: Analgesic-decongestants, Outcome 4 Side effects: gastrointestinal side effects Combination 3: Analgesic-decongestant. ...... 76 Analysis 3.5. Comparison 3 Combination 3: Analgesic-decongestants, Outcome 5 Side effects: dizziness, light headedness - Combination 3: Analgesic-decongestant. ...... 77 Analysis 3.6. Comparison 3 Combination 3: Analgesic-decongestants, Outcome 6 Side effects: all - Combination 3: Analgesic-decongestant. 78 Analysis 4.1. Comparison 4 Combination 4: Antihistamine-analgesic-decongestant, Outcome 1 Global evaluation: after 3 days of treatment - Combination 4: Antihistamine-analgesic-decongestant. 79 Analysis 4.2. Comparison 4 Combination 4: Antihistamine-analgesic-decongestant, Outcome 2 Global evaluation: after 5 daysoftreatment. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .. 79 Analysis 4.3. Comparison 4 Combination 4: Antihistamine-analgesic-decongestant, Outcome 3 Global evaluation: on the morning after evening dosing. 80 ADDITIONALTABLES. 80 APPENDICES ..................................... 96 Oral antihistamine-decongestant-analgesic combinations for the common cold (Review) i Copyright © 2012 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. WHAT’SNEW..................................... 98 HISTORY....................................... 99 CONTRIBUTIONSOFAUTHORS . 99 DECLARATIONSOFINTEREST . 99 SOURCESOFSUPPORT . 99 INDEXTERMS .................................... 100 Oral antihistamine-decongestant-analgesic combinations for the common cold (Review) ii Copyright © 2012 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [Intervention Review] Oral antihistamine-decongestant-analgesic combinations for the common cold An IM De Sutter1,2, Mieke L van Driel1,3,4, Anna A Kumar4, Olivia Lesslar4, Alja Skrt5 1Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. 2Heymans Institute of Pharmacology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. 3Discipline of General Practice, School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. 4Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia. 5Koper, Slovenia Contact address: An IM De Sutter, [email protected]. Editorial group: Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections Group. Publication status and date: New, published in Issue 2, 2012. Review content assessed as up-to-date: 16 December 2011. Citation: De Sutter AIM, van Driel ML, Kumar AA, Lesslar O, Skrt A. Oral antihistamine-decongestant-analgesic com- binations for the common cold. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD004976. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004976.pub3. Copyright © 2012 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. ABSTRACT Background Although combination formulas containing antihistamines, decongestants and/or analgesics are sold over-the-counter (OTC) in large quantities for the common cold, the evidence of effectiveness is limited. Objectives To assess the effectiveness of antihistamine-decongestant-analgesic combinations in reducing the duration and alleviating the symptoms of the common cold in adults and children. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 4), which contains the Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections Group’s Specialised Register, OLDMEDLINE (1953 to 1965), MEDLINE (1966 to November Week 3, 2011) and EMBASE (1990 to December 2011). Selection criteria Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effectiveness of antihistamine-decongestant-analgesic combinations compared with placebo, other active treatment (excluding antibiotics) or no treatment in children and adults with the common cold. Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently extracted and summarised data on general recovery, nasal obstruction, rhinorrhoea, sneezing, cough and side effects. We categorised the trials according to the active ingredients. Main results We included 27 trials (5117 participants) of common cold treatments. Fourteen trials studied antihistamine-decongestant combinations; two antihistamine-analgesic; six analgesic-decongestant; and five antihistamine-analgesic-decongestant combinations. In 21 trials the control intervention was placebo and in six trials an active substance. Reporting of methods in most trials was poor and there were Oral antihistamine-decongestant-analgesic combinations for the common cold (Review) 1 Copyright © 2012 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. large differences in design, participants, interventions and outcomes. Pooling was only possible for a limited number of studies and outcomes. Antihistamine-decongestant: 12 trials. Eight trials report on global effectiveness, six could be pooled; n = 309 on active treatment, n = 312 placebo) the odds ratio (OR) of treatment failure was 0.27 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15 to 0.50); the number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) was four (95% CI 3 to 5.6). On the final evaluation day 41% of participants in the placebo group had a favourable response compared to 66% on active treatment. Of the two trials that were not included in the pooling, one showed some global effect, the other showed no effect. Antihistamine-analgesic: three trials. Two reported on global effectiveness, data from one study was presented. (n = 290 on active treatment, n = 292 ascorbic acid). The OR of treatment failure was 0.33 (95% CI 0.23 to 0.46) and the NNTB was 6.67 (95% CI 4.76 to 12.5). After six days of treatment 43% were cured in the control group and 70% in the active treatment group. The second study also showed an effect in favour of active treatment. Analgesic-decongestant: six trials. One trial reported on global effectiveness: 73% benefited compared with 52% in the control group (paracetamol) (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.52). Antihistamine-analgesic-decongestant: Five trials. Four trials reported on global effectiveness, two could be pooled: global effect reported (less than one severity point on a four or five-point scale) with active treatment (52%) and placebo (34%); the OR of treatment failure was 0.47 (95% CI 0.33 to 0.67) and the NNTB was 5.6 (95% CI 3.8 to 10.2). Two other trials found no beneficial effect. Two other studies did not show any effect. Two studies with antihistamine-decongestant
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Table 2. 2012 AGS Beers Criteria for Potentially
    Table 2. 2012 AGS Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults Strength of Organ System/ Recommendat Quality of Recomm Therapeutic Category/Drug(s) Rationale ion Evidence endation References Anticholinergics (excludes TCAs) First-generation antihistamines Highly anticholinergic; Avoid Hydroxyzin Strong Agostini 2001 (as single agent or as part of clearance reduced with e and Boustani 2007 combination products) advanced age, and promethazi Guaiana 2010 Brompheniramine tolerance develops ne: high; Han 2001 Carbinoxamine when used as hypnotic; All others: Rudolph 2008 Chlorpheniramine increased risk of moderate Clemastine confusion, dry mouth, Cyproheptadine constipation, and other Dexbrompheniramine anticholinergic Dexchlorpheniramine effects/toxicity. Diphenhydramine (oral) Doxylamine Use of diphenhydramine in Hydroxyzine special situations such Promethazine as acute treatment of Triprolidine severe allergic reaction may be appropriate. Antiparkinson agents Not recommended for Avoid Moderate Strong Rudolph 2008 Benztropine (oral) prevention of Trihexyphenidyl extrapyramidal symptoms with antipsychotics; more effective agents available for treatment of Parkinson disease. Antispasmodics Highly anticholinergic, Avoid Moderate Strong Lechevallier- Belladonna alkaloids uncertain except in Michel 2005 Clidinium-chlordiazepoxide effectiveness. short-term Rudolph 2008 Dicyclomine palliative Hyoscyamine care to Propantheline decrease Scopolamine oral secretions. Antithrombotics Dipyridamole, oral short-acting* May
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for the Forensic Analysis of Drugs Facilitating Sexual Assault and Other Criminal Acts
    Vienna International Centre, PO Box 500, 1400 Vienna, Austria Tel.: (+43-1) 26060-0, Fax: (+43-1) 26060-5866, www.unodc.org Guidelines for the Forensic analysis of drugs facilitating sexual assault and other criminal acts United Nations publication Printed in Austria ST/NAR/45 *1186331*V.11-86331—December 2011 —300 Photo credits: UNODC Photo Library, iStock.com/Abel Mitja Varela Laboratory and Scientific Section UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna Guidelines for the forensic analysis of drugs facilitating sexual assault and other criminal acts UNITED NATIONS New York, 2011 ST/NAR/45 © United Nations, December 2011. All rights reserved. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This publication has not been formally edited. Publishing production: English, Publishing and Library Section, United Nations Office at Vienna. List of abbreviations . v Acknowledgements .......................................... vii 1. Introduction............................................. 1 1.1. Background ........................................ 1 1.2. Purpose and scope of the manual ...................... 2 2. Investigative and analytical challenges ....................... 5 3 Evidence collection ...................................... 9 3.1. Evidence collection kits .............................. 9 3.2. Sample transfer and storage........................... 10 3.3. Biological samples and sampling ...................... 11 3.4. Other samples ...................................... 12 4. Analytical considerations .................................. 13 4.1. Substances encountered in DFSA and other DFC cases .... 13 4.2. Procedures and analytical strategy...................... 14 4.3. Analytical methodology .............................. 15 4.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Intranasal Rhinitis Agents
    Intranasal Rhinitis Agents Therapeutic Class Review (TCR) February 1, 2020 No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, digital scanning, or via any information storage or retrieval system without the express written consent of Magellan Rx Management. All requests for permission should be mailed to: Magellan Rx Management Attention: Legal Department 6950 Columbia Gateway Drive Columbia, Maryland 21046 The materials contained herein represent the opinions of the collective authors and editors and should not be construed to be the official representation of any professional organization or group, any state Pharmacy and Therapeutics committee, any state Medicaid Agency, or any other clinical committee. This material is not intended to be relied upon as medical advice for specific medical cases and nothing contained herein should be relied upon by any patient, medical professional or layperson seeking information about a specific course of treatment for a specific medical condition. All readers of this material are responsible for independently obtaining medical advice and guidance from their own physician and/or other medical professional in regard to the best course of treatment for their specific medical condition. This publication, inclusive of all forms contained herein, is intended to be educational in nature and is intended to be used for informational purposes only. Send comments and suggestions to [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • MSM Cross Reference Antihistamine Decongestant 20100701 Final Posted
    MISSISSIPPI DIVISION OF MEDICAID Antihistamine/Decongestant Product and Active Ingredient Cross-Reference List The agents listed below are the antihistamine/decongestant drug products listed in the Mississippi Medicaid Preferred Drug List (PDL). This is a cross-reference between the drug product name and its active ingredients to reference the antihistamine/decongestant portion of the PDL. For more information concerning the PDL, including non- preferred agents, the OTC formulary, and other specifics, please visit our website at www.medicaid.ms.gov. List Effective 07/16/10 Therapeutic Class Active Ingredients Preferred Non-Preferred ANTIHISTAMINES - 1ST GENERATION BROMPHENIRAMINE MALEATE BPM BROMAX BROMPHENIRAMINE MALEATE J-TAN PD BROMSPIRO LODRANE 24 LOHIST 12HR VAZOL BROMPHENIRAMINE TANNATE BROMPHENIRAMINE TANNATE J-TAN P-TEX BROMPHENIRAMINE/DIPHENHYDRAM ALA-HIST CARBINOXAMINE MALEATE CARBINOXAMINE MALEATE PALGIC CHLORPHENIRAMINE MALEATE CHLORPHENIRAMINE MALEATE CPM 12 CHLORPHENIRAMINE TANNATE ED CHLORPED ED-CHLOR-TAN MYCI CHLOR-TAN MYCI CHLORPED PEDIAPHYL TANAHIST-PD CLEMASTINE FUMARATE CLEMASTINE FUMARATE CYPROHEPTADINE HCL CYPROHEPTADINE HCL DEXCHLORPHENIRAMINE MALEATE DEXCHLORPHENIRAMINE MALEATE DIPHENHYDRAMINE HCL ALLERGY MEDICINE ALLERGY RELIEF BANOPHEN BENADRYL BENADRYL ALLERGY CHILDREN'S ALLERGY CHILDREN'S COLD & ALLERGY COMPLETE ALLERGY DIPHEDRYL DIPHENDRYL DIPHENHIST DIPHENHYDRAMINE HCL DYTUSS GENAHIST HYDRAMINE MEDI-PHEDRYL PHARBEDRYL Q-DRYL QUENALIN SILADRYL SILPHEN DIPHENHYDRAMINE TANNATE DIPHENMAX DOXYLAMINE SUCCINATE
    [Show full text]
  • I. Antihistamines Seunghoon Han* Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seoul St
    2014;22(1):13-18 TCP Translational and Clinical Pharmacology http://dx.doi.org/10.12793/tcp.2014.22.1.13 Clinical Pharmacology Review for Primary Health Care Providers: I. Antihistamines Seunghoon Han* Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 137-701, Korea *Correspondence: S. Han; Tel: +82-2-2258-7326, Fax: +82-2-2258-7876, E-mail: [email protected] Received 31 May 2014 Primary health care providers play a critical role in maintaining public health, and the appropri- Accepted 31 May 2014 ate use of pharmaceutical products is one of the major parts of their practice. This series of articles, pISSN: 2289-0882 entitled ‘Clinical Pharmacology Review for Primary Health Care Providers,’ is intended to help pri- mary health care providers select more appropriate prescriptions for frequently used drugs based on up-to-date information. We expect that this effort will contribute to improvements in public health and diminish unnecessary drug use. Introduction tion on the H1 receptor.[8] THERAPEU Antihistamines include some of the most frequently prescribed drugs in the primary health care environment for the symp- Generations and Classes tomatic relief of allergic diseases, the common cold, urticaria, Many primary health care providers are well-informed about T and insomnia.[1-5] The importance of antihistamines has been the different ‘generations’ of antihistamines but not about the ICS TU emphasized as the prevalence of target diseases increases.[6,7] different ‘classes’ characterized according to chemical structure. However, the appropriate use, clinical effectiveness, and target [1] This discrepancy seems reasonable because ‘inter-generation’ T populations for prescription of antihistamines are still a matter differences are more prominent than ‘inter-class’ differences.
    [Show full text]
  • Medicines Regulations 1984 (SR 1984/143)
    Reprint as at 1 July 2014 Medicines Regulations 1984 (SR 1984/143) David Beattie, Governor-General Order in Council At the Government House at Wellington this 5th day of June 1984 Present: His Excellency the Governor-General in Council Pursuant to section 105 of the Medicines Act 1981, and, in the case of Part 3 of the regulations, to section 62 of that Act, His Excellency the Governor-General, acting on the advice of the Minister of Health tendered after consultation with the organisations and bodies that ap- peared to the Minister to be representatives of persons likely to be substantially affected, and by and with the advice and consent of the Executive Council, hereby makes the following regulations. Contents Page 1 Title and commencement 5 Note Changes authorised by subpart 2 of Part 2 of the Legislation Act 2012 have been made in this official reprint. Note 4 at the end of this reprint provides a list of the amendments incorporated. These regulations are administered by the Ministry of Health. 1 Reprinted as at Medicines Regulations 1984 1 July 2014 2 Interpretation 5 Part 1 Classification of medicines 3 Classification of medicines 11 Part 2 Standards 4 Standards for medicines, related products, medical 11 devices, cosmetics, and surgical dressings 5 Pharmacist may dilute medicine in particular case 12 6 Colouring substances [Revoked] 12 Part 3 Advertisements 7 Advertisements not to claim official approval 13 8 Advertisements for medicines 13 9 Advertisements for related products 15 10 Advertisements for medical devices 15 11 Advertisements
    [Show full text]
  • Brompheniramine Maleate, Pseudoephedrine Hydrochloride
    BROMPHENIRAMINE MALEATE, PSEUDOEPHEDRINE HYDROCHLORIDE, AND DEXTROMETHORPHAN HYDROBROMIDE- brompheniramine maleate, pseudoephedrine hydrochloride, and dextromethorphan hydrobromide syrup Morton Grove Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ---------- Brompheniramine Maleate, Pseudoephedrine Hydrochloride, and Dextromethorphan Hydrobromide Oral Syrup 2 mg/30 mg/10 mg per 5 mL Rx only DESCRIPTION Brompheniramine Maleate, Pseudoephedrine Hydrochloride and Dextromethorphan Hydrobromide Oral Syrup is a clear, light pink syrup with a butterscotch flavor. Each 5 mL (1 teaspoonful) contains: Brompheniramine Maleate, USP 2 mg Pseudoephedrine Hydrochloride, USP 30 mg Dextromethorphan Hydrobromide, USP 10 mg Alcohol 0.95% v/v In a palatable, aromatic vehicle. Inactive Ingredients: artificial butterscotch flavor, citric acid anhydrous, dehydrated alcohol, FD&C Red No. 40, glycerin, liquid sugar, methylparaben, propylene glycol, purified water and sodium benzoate. It may contain 10% citric acid solution or 10% sodium citrate solution for pH adjustment. The pH range is between 3.0 and 6.0. C16H19BrN2·C4H4O4 M.W. 435.31 Brompheniramine Maleate, USP (±)-2-p-Bromo-α-2-(dimethylamino)ethylbenzylpyridine maleate (1:1) C10H15NO · HCl M.W. 201.69 Pseudoephedrine Hydrochloride, USP (+)-Pseudoephedrine hydrochloride C18H25NO · HBr · H2O M.W. 370.32 Dextromethorphan Hydrobromide, USP 3-Methoxy-17-methyl-9α, 13α, 14α -morphinan hydrobromide monohydrate Antihistamine/Nasal Decongestant/Antitussive syrup for oral administration. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY Brompheniramine maleate is a
    [Show full text]
  • Glucocorticoids with Ketamine and Pentobarbitone- Induced General Anaesthesia in the Rat: Possible Effects on Central Cholinergic Activity
    Br. J. Pharmac. (1984), 82,339-347 Interactions of cholinesterase inhibitors and glucocorticoids with ketamine and pentobarbitone- induced general anaesthesia in the rat: possible effects on central cholinergic activity Remy S. Leeuwin, Jan K. van der Wal & Willem Spanjer Pharmacological Laboratory, University of Amsterdam, Polderweg 104,1093 KP Amsterdam, The Netherlands 1 Doses of 100, 150 and 200 igkg-1 of the cholinesterase inhibitor neostigmine reverse the anaesthetic action of ketamine. The antagonistic effect is increased as the dose is increased. The duration of anaesthesia induced by pentobarbitone is reversed by the cholinesterase inhibitor in doses of 150, 200 and 250 tig kg-1. 2 Choline, in a dose of 50mg kg-, significantly antagonizes the action of the two anaesthetics, whereas hemicholinium-3, an inhibitor of the uptake of choline and the synthesis of acetylcholine, markedly potentiates their action. 3 Dexamethasone induces a significant reduction of the duration of anaesthesia produced by ketamine and pentobarbitone. The potentiation of the anaesthetic effect caused by hemicholinium-3 is also reversed by dexamethasone. 4 The acetylcholine content in rat cerebral cortex is increased after treatment with ketamine and pentobarbitone. 5 Measurements of the course of the plasma level of pentobarbitone do not reveal alterations in the pharmacokinetic profile by either neostigmine or dexamethasone. 6 These results indicate that central cholinergic systems may somehow be involved in the anaesthesia induced by ketamine and pentobarbitone and that the interactions described in this paper may be the result of modification by neostigmine and dexamethasone of the alterations in cholinergic activity caused by the two anaesthetics. Introduction In 1977 Balmer & Wyte showed that physostigmine after completion of the operation was actually pro- antagonized the sedative effects of diazepam and longed.
    [Show full text]
  • 2-Bromopyridine Safety Data Sheet Jubilant Ingrevia Limited
    2-Bromopyridine Safety Data Sheet According to the federal final rule of hazard communication revised on 2012 (HazCom 2012) Date of Compilation : July 03 ’ 2019 Date of Revision : February 09 ’ 2021 Revision due date : January 2024 Revision Number : 01 Version Name : 0034Gj Ghs01 Div.3 sds 2-Bromopyridine Supersedes date : July 03 ’ 2019 Supersedes version : 0034Gj Ghs00 Div.3 sds 2-Bromopyridine Jubilant Ingrevia Limited Page 1 of 9 2-Bromopyridine Safety Data Sheet According to the federal final rule of hazard communication revised on 2012 (HazCom 2012) SECTION 1: IDENTIFICATION OF THE SUBSTANCE/MIXTURE AND OF THE COMPANY/UNDERTAKING 1.1. Product identifier PRODUCT NAME : 2-Bromopyridine CAS RN : 109-04-6 EC# : 203-641-6 SYNONYMS : 2-Pyridyl bromide, Pyridine, 2-bromo-, beta-Bromopyridine, o-Bromopyridine SYSTEMATIC NAME : 2-Bromopyridine, -Pyridine, 2-bromo- MOLECULAR FORMULA : C5H4BrN STRUCTURAL FORMULA N Br 1.2. Relevant identified uses of the substance or mixture and uses advised against 1.2.1. Relevant identified uses 2-Bromopyridine is used as an intermediate in the pharmaceutical industry for the manufacture of Atazanavir (an antiretroviral drug), Carbinoxamine, Chloropyramine, triprolidine (antihistamine drugs), Disopyramide Phosphate (an antiarrythmic drug), Mefloquine (antimalarial drug), Pipradrol (mild CNS stimulant) etc. Uses advised against: None 1.3. Details of the supplier of the safety data sheet Jubilant Ingrevia Limited REGISTERED & FACTORY OFFICE: Jubilant Ingrevia Limited Bhartiagram, Gajraula , District: Amroha, Uttar Pradesh-244223, India PHONE NO: +91-5924-252353 to 252360 Contact Department-Safety: Ext. 7424 , FAX NO : +91-5924-252352 HEAD OFFICE: Jubilant Ingrevia Limited, Plot 1-A, Sector 16-A,Institutional Area, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, 201301 - India T +91-120-4361000 - F +91-120-4234881 / 84 / 85 / 87 / 95 / 96 [email protected] -www.jubilantingrevia.com 1.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology of Amphetamine and Related Designer Drugs
    Pharmacology and Toxicology of Amphetamine and Related Designer Drugs U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES • Public Health Service • Alcohol Drug Abuse and Mental Health Administration Pharmacology and Toxicology of Amphetamine and Related Designer Drugs Editors: Khursheed Asghar, Ph.D. Division of Preclinical Research National Institute on Drug Abuse Errol De Souza, Ph.D. Addiction Research Center National Institute on Drug Abuse NIDA Research Monograph 94 1989 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration National Institute on Drug Abuse 5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 20857 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, DC 20402 Pharmacology and Toxicology of Amphetamine and Related Designer Drugs ACKNOWLEDGMENT This monograph is based upon papers and discussion from a technical review on pharmacology and toxicology of amphetamine and related designer drugs that took place on August 2 through 4, 1988, in Bethesda, MD. The review meeting was sponsored by the Biomedical Branch, Division of Preclinical Research, and the Addiction Research Center, National Institute on Drug Abuse. COPYRIGHT STATUS The National Institute on Drug Abuse has obtained permission from the copyright holders to reproduce certain previously published material as noted in the text. Further reproduction of this copyrighted material is permitted only as part of a reprinting of the entire publication or chapter. For any other use, the copyright holder’s permission is required. All other matieral in this volume except quoted passages from copyrighted sources is in the public domain and may be used or reproduced without permission from the Institute or the authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article (PDF)
    Use of astemizole in a large group practice TIMOTHY J. CRAIG, DO MARK GREENWALD, MD VANESSA KAUFFMANN JILL CRAIG, MS Astemizole was released in 1988. Shortly after the release of astemizole and terfe­ In late 1992, a new warning label was added nadine, it became evident that both were associat­ in response to reports of syncope and death ed with prolonged QT intervals and arrhythmias, from arrhythmia. Records of patients given new mainly torsades de pointes. Because of this associ­ prescriptions for astemizole were reviewed ation, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and to assess compliance with the warnings in a the manufacturers provided a warning letter to large multispecialty practice. The indication physicians in 1992.1 For astemizole, the warning was appropriate in 89% of cases. Excessive stated: (1) That arrhythmias have usually occurred doses were used in 4% of cases. Two percent when the dose of 10 mg/d (the recommended dose) of prescriptions were given to patients with was exceeded. Exceeding this dose and the use of contraindications. Only two complications loading doses should be avoided. (2) Serum levels were documented. Despite carrying a drug of astemizole may be elevated by ketoconazole, ery­ warning, astemizole continues to be used thromycin;, and itraconazole. These drugs should inappropriately and is a medicolegal concern. not be used together. (3) Presyncope and syncope Education and drug evaluations can be used may precede fatal arrhythmias and calls for dis­ to enhance compliance and decrease the risk continuing astemizole. (4) The drug should be avoid­ associated with the use of astemizole. ed in patients with significant liver disease.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Supplementary File
    Supplemental Material for High-throughput screening discovers anti-fibrotic properties of Haloperidol by hindering myofibroblast activation Michael Rehman1, Simone Vodret1, Luca Braga2, Corrado Guarnaccia3, Fulvio Celsi4, Giulia Rossetti5, Valentina Martinelli2, Tiziana Battini1, Carlin Long2, Kristina Vukusic1, Tea Kocijan1, Chiara Collesi2,6, Nadja Ring1, Natasa Skoko3, Mauro Giacca2,6, Giannino Del Sal7,8, Marco Confalonieri6, Marcello Raspa9, Alessandro Marcello10, Michael P. Myers11, Sergio Crovella3, Paolo Carloni5, Serena Zacchigna1,6 1Cardiovascular Biology, 2Molecular Medicine, 3Biotechnology Development, 10Molecular Virology, and 11Protein Networks Laboratories, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), Padriciano, 34149, Trieste, Italy 4Institute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy 5Computational Biomedicine Section, Institute of Advanced Simulation IAS-5 and Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine INM-9, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52425, Jülich, Germany 6Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34149 Trieste, Italy 7National Laboratory CIB, Area Science Park Padriciano, Trieste, 34149, Italy 8Department of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, 34127, Italy 9Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (IBCN), CNR-Campus International Development (EMMA- INFRAFRONTIER-IMPC), Rome, Italy This PDF file includes: Supplementary Methods Supplementary References Supplementary Figures with legends 1 – 18 Supplementary Tables with legends 1 – 5 Supplementary Movie legends 1, 2 Supplementary Methods Cell culture Primary murine fibroblasts were isolated from skin, lung, kidney and hearts of adult CD1, C57BL/6 or aSMA-RFP/COLL-EGFP mice (1) by mechanical and enzymatic tissue digestion. Briefly, tissue was chopped in small chunks that were digested using a mixture of enzymes (Miltenyi Biotec, 130- 098-305) for 1 hour at 37°C with mechanical dissociation followed by filtration through a 70 µm cell strainer and centrifugation.
    [Show full text]