DOCSLIB.ORG

Approaches to Solving the Express Shipment Service Network Design Problem

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

APPROACHES TO SOLVING THE EXPRESS SHIPMENT SERVICE NETWORK DESIGN PROBLEM A Thesis Presented to The Academic Faculty by Leah Josefine Ruckle In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology August 2018 Copyright c 2018 by Leah Josefine Ruckle APPROACHES TO SOLVING THE EXPRESS SHIPMENT SERVICE NETWORK DESIGN PROBLEM Approved by: Prof. Dimitri Mavris, Advisor Prof. Graeme Kennedy School of Aerospace Engineering School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology Prof. Brian German Dr. Elena Garcia School of Aerospace Engineering School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology Prof. Alejandro Toriello Date Approved: July 9, 2018 School of Industrial & Systems Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology To Rohini Ralby, my Guru. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thank you to all the people who have helped me on this journey and made this dissertation possible. First and foremost, thank you to my advisor, Prof. Dimitri Mavris who believed in me before I even set foot on campus. Thank you for all of the things that you have taught, shown, and done for me. A special thank you as well to the members of my doctoral committee, Professors Brian German, Alejandro Toriello and Graeme Kennedy, and Dr. Elena Garcia. I am grateful for your insightful questions, feedback and guidance which undoubtedly made this dissertation richer. Thank you as well to my wonderful boyfriend, Matt Daskilewicz. Finishing this dissertation these past few months would not have been possible without your selfless support. Thank you for being my sounding board, cooking me dinner every night when I worked late, giving me ample hugs, and most of all, being my best friend. I love you, Matthew. I look forward to our future adventures together. Thank you as well to my Guru, Rohini Ralby. You have been with me every step of the way since before I can remember. I so greatly appreciate your steadfast guidance and Love. Thank you so much for your support and daily phone calls these past several months, and all that I have learned from you over the years. It is no exaggeration to say that I would not be where I am today without you. Thank you as well to my parents, Melanie and Keith for encouraging my curiosity about the world and my interest in building things, no matter how many legos you stepped on or pried out of the vacuum cleaner. Finally, thank you to all my friends who have supported and cheered for me along the way, including (but not limited to) Adam Cox, Mallory Rose, David Pate, Xiaofan Fei, Kelly Collett, Erica Feldscher, David Soud, Ian Ralby, and Aaron Ralby. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION .................................. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................... iv LIST OF TABLES ............................... x LIST OF FIGURES .............................. xiii SUMMARY .................................... xv I INTRODUCTION AND MOTIVATION ............... 1 II PROBLEM CHARACTERIZATION ................. 9 2.1 The Express Shipment Problem.................... 10 2.2 Scope of Express Shipment Carriers Today.............. 10 2.2.1 Problem Scope.......................... 12 2.3 Movement of Packages Through the Express Shipment Network... 14 2.3.1 Last Mile Service and Line Haul Service............ 15 2.3.2 Activities............................. 16 2.3.3 Important Activity Times, Cycles and Phases......... 17 2.4 Packages Aggregated as Commodity Flows.............. 18 2.5 Air Fleet Considerations........................ 19 2.6 Air Network Topology.......................... 20 2.7 Data Set................................. 22 2.7.1 Facility Locations........................ 22 2.7.2 Sort Capacity.......................... 24 2.7.3 Product Types and Commit Days............... 24 2.7.4 Commodity Demand...................... 26 2.7.5 Vehicle Fleet and Hull Count.................. 27 2.7.6 Cost............................... 28 2.8 Summary................................. 29 v III EXPRESS SHIPMENT SERVICE NETWORK DESIGN: MOD- ELING THE EXPRESS SHIPMENT PROBLEM ......... 31 3.1 Modeling Logistics Problems as Mixed Integer Programs....... 31 3.2 Network Design Problems........................ 34 3.2.1 Network Design Problem Formulation............. 37 3.2.2 Service Network Design Problem Formulations........ 39 3.3 Express Shipment Service Network Design Problem......... 43 3.3.1 Time-Space Graphs....................... 45 3.3.2 Express Shipment Service Network Design Problem Formulation 46 3.4 Summary................................. 51 IV METHODS FOR SOLVING MIXED INTEGER PROGRAMS, THE ESSND AND RELATED PROBLEMS ................ 52 4.1 A Brief Overview of Solution Approaches for Mixed Integer Programs 52 4.1.1 Linear Programming Solution Methods............ 53 4.1.2 Monolithic Solution Methods for Mixed Integer Programming 54 4.1.3 Decomposition Solution Methods for Mixed Integer Program- ming............................... 61 4.1.4 Heuristic and Metaheuristic Solution Methods for Mixed In- teger Programming....................... 64 4.2 Express Shipment Service Network Design Problem Analysis and So- lution Approaches............................ 67 4.2.1 Collaboration Between MIT and UPS............. 67 4.2.2 ESSND Problem Solution Methods.............. 70 4.2.3 ESSND Problem Analysis.................... 74 4.3 Solution Approaches for Related Problems.............. 77 4.3.1 Relevant Survey Papers..................... 77 4.3.2 Lettermail/Postal Package Delivery Problems......... 78 4.3.3 Passenger Airline Problems................... 79 4.3.4 Less-Than-Truckload Problems................. 83 4.3.5 Other Transportation Planning & Logistics Problems.... 85 vi 4.3.6 Other Network Design Problems................ 87 4.4 Summary................................. 90 V RESEARCH PLAN ............................ 91 5.1 Solution Methods............................ 91 5.2 Heuristic Decomposition-Based Research Questions.......... 95 5.2.1 Discipline Definition....................... 97 5.2.2 Discipline Arrangement..................... 99 5.2.3 Improvements to the Sequential Algorithm.......... 101 5.3 Benders Decomposition-Based Research Questions.......... 104 5.4 Experimental Testbed.......................... 106 5.5 Summary................................. 109 VI SOLVING THE ESSND PROBLEM USING A MONOLITHIC APPROACH ................................. 111 6.1 Creation of the Time-Space Graph................... 112 6.1.1 Network Creation in the Literature.............. 112 6.1.2 Network Creation for the Express Shipment Problem..... 113 6.2 Defining Commodity Routing Options................. 118 6.3 Generating Vehicle Movement Options................. 121 6.4 Results.................................. 122 6.4.1 Computational Testbed..................... 122 6.4.2 Baseline Problem Instance................... 123 6.4.3 Unreduced Problem Instance.................. 126 6.5 Sensitivity Studies............................ 127 6.5.1 Number of Airports....................... 128 6.5.2 Product Set........................... 129 6.5.3 Temporal Scope......................... 130 6.5.4 Consolidation Opportunities.................. 131 6.5.5 Secondary Sort Threshold.................... 133 6.5.6 Formulation Relaxations.................... 135 vii 6.6 Summary................................. 138 VII HEURISTIC DECOMPOSITION ................... 139 7.1 Research Questions for the Development of the Heuristic Decomposi- tion Approach.............................. 140 7.2 Discipline Definition........................... 145 7.2.1 Physical Decomposition: Temporal............... 147 7.2.2 Physical Decomposition: Spatial................ 150 7.2.3 Functional Decomposition.................... 155 7.2.4 Refinement of the Discipline Definition Hypothesis...... 162 7.3 Discipline Arrangement......................... 163 7.3.1 Fixed-Point Iteration-Based Solution Generation Approach. 166 7.3.2 Package Routing with Aircraft Problem............ 170 7.3.3 Basic Sequential Algorithm................... 177 7.4 Collapsed Product Set Sequential Algorithm............. 182 7.4.1 Collapsed Product Set Package Routing Problem....... 182 7.4.2 Collapsed Product Set Sequential Algorithm......... 188 7.4.3 Collapsed Product Set Sequential Algorithm with Flexible De- ferred Volume.......................... 197 7.5 Improved Sequential Algorithm..................... 200 7.5.1 Phase-Based Hull Count Constraint.............. 200 7.5.2 Improved Sequential Algorithm with the Phase-Based Hull Count Constraint........................ 206 7.5.3 Sort-Centric Balance Constraint................ 209 7.5.4 Improved Sequential Algorithm with the Sort-Centric Balance and Phase-Based Hull Count Constraints........... 212 7.6 Sensitivity Studies............................ 215 7.6.1 Sort Capacity.......................... 215 7.6.2 Fleet Size............................. 218 7.6.3 Airport Subsets......................... 224 7.6.4 Different Days of the Week................... 226 viii 7.6.5 Temporal Scope......................... 229 7.7 Summary................................. 233 VIII BENDERS DECOMPOSITION .................... 235 8.1 Benders Reformulation and Decomposition.............. 237 8.1.1 Formulation of ESSND Problem for Benders Decomposition. 241 8.2 Relevant Applications of Benders Decomposition in the Literature. 242 8.2.1 Applications to Airline Problems................ 243 8.2.2 Applications to other Transportation and Network Design Prob- lems...............................
Recommended publications
  • Settlement Terms, As Approved by Venus’S Counsel and Class Counsel, Subject to Approval by The

    Settlement Terms, As Approved by Venus’S Counsel and Class Counsel, Subject to Approval by The

    Case3:15-cv-03578-EDL Document15 Filed09/29/15 Page1 of 29 1 LEXINGTON LAW GROUP Mark N. Todzo, State Bar No. 168389 2 Abigail Blodgett, State Bar No. 278813 503 Divisadero Street 3 San Francisco, CA 94117 Telephone: (415) 913-7800 4 Facsimile: (415) 759-4112 [email protected] 5 [email protected] 6 HALUNEN LAW Melissa W. Wolchansky (pro hac vice pending) 7 Charles D. Moore (pro hac vice pending) 80 South Eighth Street, Suite 1650 8 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Telephone: (612) 605-4098 9 Facsimile: (612) 605-4099 [email protected] 10 [email protected] 11 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Putative Classes 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 15 16 REBEKAH BAHARESTAN and JENA Case No. 3:15-cv-03578-EDL MCINTYRE, on behalf of themselves and all 17 others similarly situated, MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF 18 Plaintiffs, MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION 19 v. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 20 Date: November 3, 2015 VENUS LABORATORIES, INC., dba EARTH Time: 10:00 a.m. 21 FRIENDLY PRODUCTS, INC., Location: Courtroom E Judge: Hon. Elizabeth D. Laporte 22 Defendant. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 3:15-cv-03578-EDL MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF JOINT MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Case3:15-cv-03578-EDL Document15 Filed09/29/15 Page2 of 29 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Page 2 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION ....................................................................................... vi 3 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES .................................................................1 4 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................1 5 STATEMENT OF FACTS ..............................................................................................................2 6 I.
  • Fedex Corp Proxy

    Fedex Corp Proxy

    4AUG200523421009 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS To Be Held September 28, 2009 To Our Stockholders: We cordially invite you to attend the 2009 annual meeting of FedEx’s stockholders. The meeting will take place in The Grand Ballroom at The Peabody Hotel, 149 Union Avenue, Memphis, Tennessee 38103, on Monday, September 28, 2009, at 10:00 a.m. local time. We look forward to your attendance either in person or by proxy. The purpose of the meeting is to: 1. Elect twelve directors; 2. Ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as FedEx’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2010; 3. Act upon four stockholder proposals, if properly presented at the meeting; and 4. Transact any other business that may properly come before the meeting. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on August 3, 2009, may vote at the meeting or any postponements or adjournments of the meeting. By order of the Board of Directors, 4AUG200523413606 CHRISTINE P. RICHARDS Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary August 17, 2009 HOW TO VOTE: Please complete, date, sign and return the accompanying proxy card or voting instruction card, or vote electronically via the Internet or by telephone. The enclosed return envelope requires no additional postage if mailed in the United States. REDUCE MAILING COSTS: If you vote on the Internet, you may elect to have next year’s proxy statement and annual report to stockholders delivered to you electronically. We strongly encourage you to enroll in electronic delivery. It is a cost-effective way for us to provide you with proxy materials and annual reports.
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT of INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION in Re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMEN

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT of INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION in Re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMEN

    USDC IN/ND case 3:05-md-00527-RLM-MGG document 3279 filed 03/22/19 page 1 of 354 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION ) Case No. 3:05-MD-527 RLM In re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE ) (MDL 1700) SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMENT ) PRACTICES LITIGATION ) ) ) THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ) ) Carlene Craig, et. al. v. FedEx Case No. 3:05-cv-530 RLM ) Ground Package Systems, Inc., ) ) PROPOSED FINAL APPROVAL ORDER This matter came before the Court for hearing on March 11, 2019, to consider final approval of the proposed ERISA Class Action Settlement reached by and between Plaintiffs Leo Rittenhouse, Jeff Bramlage, Lawrence Liable, Kent Whistler, Mike Moore, Keith Berry, Matthew Cook, Heidi Law, Sylvia O’Brien, Neal Bergkamp, and Dominic Lupo1 (collectively, “the Named Plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and the Certified Class, and Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (“FXG”) (collectively, “the Parties”), the terms of which Settlement are set forth in the Class Action Settlement Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) attached as Exhibit A to the Joint Declaration of Co-Lead Counsel in support of Preliminary Approval of the Kansas Class Action 1 Carlene Craig withdrew as a Named Plaintiff on November 29, 2006. See MDL Doc. No. 409. Named Plaintiffs Ronald Perry and Alan Pacheco are not movants for final approval and filed an objection [MDL Doc. Nos. 3251/3261]. USDC IN/ND case 3:05-md-00527-RLM-MGG document 3279 filed 03/22/19 page 2 of 354 Settlement [MDL Doc. No. 3154-1]. Also before the Court is ERISA Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for Attorney’s Fees and for Payment of Service Awards to the Named Plaintiffs, filed with the Court on October 19, 2018 [MDL Doc.
  • Assessment of Innovative and Automated Freight Strategies and Technologies—Phase I Final Report

    Assessment of Innovative and Automated Freight Strategies and Technologies—Phase I Final Report

    Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA/TX-17/0-6837-1 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date ASSESSMENT OF INNOVATIVE AND AUTOMATED FREIGHT February 2017 STRATEGIES AND TECHNOLOGIES—PHASE I FINAL REPORT 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Curtis Morgan, Jeffery Warner, Allan Rutter, Dahye Lee, C. James Report 0-6837-1 Kruse, Dong Hun Kang, Mario Monsreal, Jolanda Prozzi, Juan Carlos Villa, Jeffrey Borowiec, Leslie Olson, David Bierling, and Edwin Varela 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Texas A&M Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System 11. Contract or Grant No. College Station, Texas 77843-3135 Project 0-6837 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Technical Report: Research and Technology Implementation Office March 2016 125 E. 11th Street 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Austin, Texas 78701-2483 15. Supplementary Notes Project performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. Project Title: Assessment of Innovative and Automated Freight Systems and Development of Evaluation Tools URL: http://tti.tamu.edu/documents/0-6837-1.pdf 16. Abstract Many innovative freight delivery strategies and technologies have been proposed to address the future freight needs of Texas’s growing population. Changes in both buying habits and a shift toward direct home package delivery threaten to dramatically change distribution patterns and increase the number of intercity and local delivery trucks on Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) roadways.
  • Freight and Air Quality Handbook

    Freight and Air Quality Handbook

    Air Quality Handbook May 2010 Freight and Air Quality Handbook Notice This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the use of the information contained in this document. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. The U.S. Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trademarks or manufacturers’ names may appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the objective of the document. Quality Assurance Statement The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) provides high-quality information to serve Government, industry, and the public in a manner that promotes public understanding. Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of its information. FHWA periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement. Freight and Air Quality Handbook Table of Contents Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 1 2.0 BACKGROUND ON FREIGHT-RELATED AIR QUALITY ............................... 3 2.1 EMISSIONS AND AIR QUALITY IMPACTS ........................................ 3 2.2 FREIGHT SOURCES OF AIR POLLUTANTS ..................................... 10 2.3 REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT ..................................................... 16 3.0 STRATEGIES FOR FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION-RELATED

  • President's Message Inside

    Inside 3Q2013 2 . Five Tips for Preparing Effective Intellectual Property Assignments 3 . ACC News 4 . FOCUS on Pro Bono 4 ... FedEx Ground Impacts the Community with its Pro Bono Efforts 5 ... MSA’s Law Department Partners with “Wills for Heroes” for Pro Bono Works 6 . Contract Negotiations — Terms and Conditions 7 . Upcoming Events 8 . Welcome New Members! 8 . Board Members and Contacts FOCUS President’s Message Kevin Whyte, Carmeuse Lime & Stone For this edition of Focus, I wanted to say “no”, but rather try to strive to perform at a higher address the noble calling of the legal determine the underlying standard. $is does not profession. So I “Googled” “law profession goal and fashion a solution. mean, however, that we need and quotes” hoping to !nd a good lead in to simply accept interpreta- Just two examples (there are to this article. Try it yourself. Su"ce it to tions or positions taken by many more and probably say – not a pretty site. We lawyers get a bad the regulatory agencies. better ones) are set forth rap, maybe sometimes deserved. However, In some cases, we need to below. whether serving in house or in private challenge such positions. practice, I still believe, a#er all these years, I am sure that many of us At times, the agencies seem that lawyers serve a valuable purpose in have had business people to give too little weight (or our society. Perhaps, there are too many of come to us and say - how even no weight) to economic us, but I would still be proud if one of my can we get out of this contract? I still considerations.
  • LTL Shipping Guide What Is LTL Shipping?

    LTL Shipping Guide What Is LTL Shipping?

    Roadrunner Freight’s LTL Shipping Guide What is LTL Shipping? Less-than-Truckload (LTL) shipping is the action of moving freight that does not require a full trailer and moving it from Point A to Point B. When shipping LTL freight, shipments will share the cost and amount of space occupied on a trailer with other freight. LTL shipping is a cost effective alternative to Truckload shipments and provides many benefits to shippers, such as flexibility and competitive prices. Companies of all sizes take advantage of the cost savings, benefits and expertise that LTL companies provide, and is particularly beneficial to eCommerce, retail and manufacturing companies. Roadrunner Freight | rrts.com/freight Less-than-Truckload vs. Truckload Shipping There are many different options a shipper can take to move freight. When deciding between using a Truckload (TL) carrier or a Less-than-Truckload (LTL) carrier, the number of pallets being shipped, the weight, space occupied and time constraints should be taken into consideration. Less-than-Truckload shipping is often less expensive and more economical than Truckload shipping. If there are strict deadlines, this information must be shared with the carrier to ensure that all parties are meeting expectations. Less-Than-Truckload (LTL) Shipment The trailer is filled up with shipments from different companies who pay for space based on the freight’s density and dimensional weight. shipper one shipper two shipper three shipper four ROADRUNNERR FREIGHT Truckload (TL) Shipment The entire trailer is filled with goods from the same shipper. one shipper Roadrunner Freight | rrts.com/freight LTL Industry Overview Less-than-Truckload shipping began when businesses recognized that they frequently needed to ship smaller amounts of goods in a cost efficient and economical way.
  • 3 Partnership Region 3 Team

    3 Partnership Region 3 Team

    Ontario Quebec 3 29077 Clemens Rd., Cleveland, OH 44145 P: 800-599-2902 • F: 800-439-8913 Wisconsin Michigan Pennsylvania Alaska Ohio Illinois Yukon Indiana Northwest Nunavut Territories New Foundland Kentucky and Labrador Prince Edward Island British Columbia Alberta Saskatchewan Manitoba Ontario Quebec Nova Scotia Washington 6 Maine Montana North Minnesota Dakota New Brunswick Vermont Oregon 3 4 New Hampshire New Idaho South Wisconsin Massachusetts Dakota York 1 Michigan Rhode Island 93000- Wyoming Connecticut 95999 Iowa Pennsylvania Nebraska ★ New Jersey Nevada Ohio Illinois Delaware Utah Indiana Maryland California Colorado West Virginia Kansas Missouri Virginia Kentuckyy 5 North ★ 90000- Tennessee Carolina 92999 Oklahoma Arizona New Arkansas Mexico 2 South Carolina Hawaii Alabama Georgia Texas 2302 Martin St., Irvine, CA 92612 Mississippi Florida Louisiana P: 800-599-2902 • F: 877-489-0131 Mexico PARTNERSHIP REGION 3 TEAM LTL Freight Shipping Tradeshow Shipping Small Package Shipping Senior Account Account Sr Tradeshow Tradeshow Customer Representative Representative Account Rep Account Rep Service Rep Brian Hardman Bryan Korecz Bryan Chambers Mike Rankin Amy Ketchum 800-599-2902 x2451 800-599-2902 x2591 800-599-2902 x2462 800-599-2902 x2596 800-599-2902 x2595 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] LTL FREIGHT • SMALL PACKAGE • TRADESHOW • SPECIALIZED SOLUTIONS Quick Reference Guide LTL FREIGHT SHIPPING TIPS, HINTS, TRADESHOW SHIPPING TIPS, HINTS, AND DEFINITIONS AND DEFINITIONS • Less-Than-Truckload (LTL) means the shipment • A decorator is the company in charge of tradeshow does not completely fi ll a truck and weighs more than setup, tear down, and material handling. 150 lbs.
  • Diversity & Inclusion Guidebook

    Diversity & Inclusion Guidebook

    PITTSBURGH REGION DIVERSITY & INCLUSION GUIDEBOOK Real world examples of how to improve organizational performance VOLUME 1 2018 and social responsibility through Diversity & Inclusion practices IN TODAY’S BUSINESS CLIMATE, diversity and inclusion to use. With permission, Vibrant Pittsburgh provides the are essential components of a positive, productive GDIB as the foundation of our Diversity and Inclusion workforce. Strong diversity and inclusion initiatives are Guidebook. We understand that best practices impact quickly becoming the backbone of today’s successful and influence one another and, as reflected in organizations, and are driving the future of tomorrow. the GDIB model, diversity and inclusion work is interconnective and systemic in nature. This guidebook categorizes diversity and inclusion best practices via Workforce, Marketplace and We encourage continued high-quality diversity Workplace, and have aligned them with the Global and inclusion efforts, as well as further Diversity and Inclusion Benchmarks: Standards collaboration between and among our for Organizations Around the World. organizations. We look forward to more regional progress and best practices Identified by 95 expert panelists around sharing for our future volumes. the world, the Global Diversity & Inclusion Benchmarks (GDIB) is free for anyone From Global Diversity and Inclusion Benchmarks: Standards for Organizations Around the World © 2017 Julie O’Mara and Alan Richter. Used with permission. All Rights Reserved. www.centreforglobalinclusion.org. Vibrant Pittsburgh’s mission is to build a thriving and inclusive Pittsburgh region by attracting, retaining and elevating a diversity of talent. VibrantPittsburgh.org | 707 Grant Street, Suite 2305 | Pittsburgh, PA 15219 | [email protected] | 412-281-8600 DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION are worldwide practices that are agreed to share their practices.
  • General Packaging Guidelines

    General Packaging Guidelines

    General Packaging Guidelines Page 1 General Packaging Guidelines At FedEx, we know proper packaging can help ensure that your shipments arrive safely. So we offer general packaging guidelines — from measuring and weighing your package, to packing methods, sealing and label- ing instructions, and guidelines for restricted shipments. Shipment Size and Weight Restrictions Length and Girth Formula Girth is • With FedEx Express® U.S. services, you can ship (2 x width) + (2 x height) packages up to 150 lbs.; up to 119" in length and 165" in length and girth. • With FedEx Express international services, you can ship packages up to 150 lbs.; up to 108" in length and Height 130" in length and girth. • With FedEx Express® Freight Services, you can ship individual skids of 150 lbs. or more. Skids exceeding Width 2,200 lbs. in weight or exceeding 70" in height, 119" Length in length, or 80" in width require prior approval. FedEx Freight® shipments may be palletized or Length is the longest side of the package or object. nonpalletized, weigh up to 20,000 lbs., and measure up to 21 feet in length. Calculating Dimensional Weight • With FedEx Ground® and FedEx Home Delivery® Dimensional weight applies when the package is Services, you can ship packages up to 150 lbs; up to relatively light compared with its volume. If the 108" in length, and 165" in length plus girth. dimensional weight exceeds the actual weight, charges Place yellow and black safety heavyweight labels over the based on the dimensional weight will be assessed. To diagonal corners of the package if it weighs more than 75 calculate it: lbs.
  • NEVADA STATE FREIGHT PLAN APPENDIX 3: CONTEXT and COMPETITIVE MARKET ANALYSIS a Strategic Framework for Freight Mobility and Economic Competitiveness

    NEVADA STATE FREIGHT PLAN APPENDIX 3: CONTEXT and COMPETITIVE MARKET ANALYSIS a Strategic Framework for Freight Mobility and Economic Competitiveness

    NEVADA STATE FREIGHT PLAN APPENDIX 3: CONTEXT AND COMPETITIVE MARKET ANALYSIS A strategic framework for freight mobility and economic competitiveness SEPTEMBER 2016 PIPELINE SHIP PLANE TRAIN TRUCK VANCOUVER SEATTLE SPOKANE PORTLAND RENO ELKO SAN FRANCISCO SALT LAKE CITY OAKLAND ELY DENVER LAS VEGAS LOS ANGELES PHOENIX SAN DIEGO EL PASO APPENDICES Part 3: Context & Competitive Market Analysis 3A. Competitive Market Analysis 3B. Nevada’s Share of Employment and Personal Earnings by Economic Region 3C. Major Multimodal Freight Transportation Drivers and Critical Issues Prepared for Nevada Department of Transportation September 1, 2016 Appendices Part 3: Appendix 3A Competitive Market Analysis Prepared for Nevada Department of Transportation September 2016 Contents Section Page 1 Introduction.............................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Intention of the Freight Plan........................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Freight as a Component of the Global Network ............................................................... 1-1 1.2.1 Freight Categories ............................................................................................. 1-1 1.2.2 Supply Chains .................................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Global & Local Competitive Focus ................................................................................... 1-3 1.3.1 Freight
  • FEDEX GROUND PITTSBURGH MARATHON RELAY HANDBOOK the Fedex Ground Pittsburgh Marathon Relay Course Is the Same As the DICK’S Sporting Goods Pittsburgh Marathon Course

    FEDEX GROUND PITTSBURGH MARATHON RELAY HANDBOOK the Fedex Ground Pittsburgh Marathon Relay Course Is the Same As the DICK’S Sporting Goods Pittsburgh Marathon Course

    FEDEX GROUND PITTSBURGH MARATHON RELAY HANDBOOK The FedEx Ground Pittsburgh Marathon Relay course is the same as the DICK’S Sporting Goods Pittsburgh Marathon course. The 2-5 person relay offers a distance for everyone, regardless of your fitness level. GENERAL MARATHON RELAY INFORMATION Packet Pickup Race numbers, timing-tags, shirts and runner goody bags can be picked up at the GNC Live Well Pittsburgh Health and Fitness Expo at the David L. Lawrence Convention Center. The Expo is open Friday, May 4 from 11:00 AM ‐ 8:00 PM and Saturday, May 5 from 9:00 AM ‐ 6:00 PM. There is no packet pickup on race day. One relay team member can pick up packets for their entire team, individuals can pick up themselves, or any combination of the above. Runner Numbers All FedEx Ground Pittsburgh Marathon Relay participants will receive a FedEx Ground Pittsburgh Marathon Relay race number that must be worn on the front of the runner’s shirt, and a FedEx Ground Pittsburgh Marathon Relay designation that must be worn on the runner’s back. Please note, each bib is designated with a number 1-5 after the team number. These numbers are assigned at random and do not represent what leg of the race you are running, that is up to the Team Captain to decide. You do not need to notify us of who is running which leg. Timing/Scoring/Awards Each team member will wear an individual timing-tag, which will be fastened to his/her shoe. Once a relay member has crossed the timing mat and finished his/her leg of the race, he/she should remove the timing‐tag from his/her shoe to avoid any potential timing issues while passing near a timing mat at the relay exchange or near the finish line.