DOCSLIB.ORG

Mapping Mental Health Finances in Ghana, Uganda, Sri Lanka, India and Lao PDR

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mapping Mental Health Finances in Ghana, Uganda, Sri Lanka, India and Lao PDR Shoba Raja, Sarah K Wood, Victoria de Menil and Saju C Mannarath Mapping mental health finances in Ghana, Uganda, Sri Lanka, India and Lao PDR Article (Published version) (Refereed) Original citation: Raja, Shoba and Wood, Sarah K. and de Menil, Victoria and Mannarath, Saju C. (2010) Mapping mental health finances in Ghana, Uganda, Sri Lanka, India and Lao PDR. International journal of mental health systems, 4 (11). ISSN 1752-4458 DOI: 10.1186/1752-4458-4-11 © 2010 The Authors This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/45277/ Available in LSE Research Online: August 2012 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. Raja et al. International Journal of Mental Health Systems 2010, 4:11 http://www.ijmhs.com/content/4/1/11 RESEARCH Open Access MappingResearch mental health finances in Ghana, Uganda, Sri Lanka, India and Lao PDR Shoba Raja1, Sarah K Wood1, Victoria de Menil*2 and Saju C Mannarath1 Abstract Background: Limited evidence about mental health finances in low and middle-income countries is a key challenge to mental health care policy initiatives. This study aimed to map mental health finances in Ghana, Uganda, India (Kerala state), Sri Lanka and Lao PDR focusing on how much money is available for mental health, how it is spent, and how this impacts mental health services. Methods: A researcher in each region reviewed public mental health-related budgets and interviewed key informants on government mental health financing. A total of 43 key informant interviews were conducted. Quantitative data was analyzed in an excel matrix using descriptive statistics. Key informant interviews were coded a priori against research questions. Results: National ring-fenced budgets for mental health as a percentage of national health spending for 2007-08 is 1.7% in Sri Lanka, 3.7% in Ghana, 2.0% in Kerala (India) and 6.6% in Uganda. Budgets were not available in Lao PDR. The majority of ring-fenced budgets (76% to 100%) is spent on psychiatric hospitals. Mental health spending could not be tracked beyond the psychiatric hospital level due to limited information at the health centre and community levels. Conclusions: Mental health budget information should be tracked and made publically accessible. Governments can adapt WHO AIMS indicators for reviewing national mental health finances. Funding allocations work more effectively through decentralization. Mental health financing should reflect new ideas emerging from community based practice in LMICs. Background Mental Health Financing, which constitutes one module Although not the only obstacle, one of the primary barri- of the Mental Health Policy and Service Guidance Pack- ers to adequate mental health care is inappropriate men- age issued by the WHO in 2003. The guidance package tal health financing [1,2]. In ten years of delivering mental lays out eight sequential steps to good mental health health and development services across eight low and financing. The first two steps are to understand the broad middle income countries, BasicNeeds and its 42 imple- health financing context, and to map current resources menting partners, from both government and commu- and how they are used in the mental health system. nity sectors, have been challenged by the scarcity of resources. Our government partners, particularly those WHO ATLAS Data (Global & Regional Levels) within health ministries, share in the desire for greater Following its own guidance, the WHO preliminarily capacity - both human and material - so they can deliver mapped national budgets for mental health as one com- the mental health services being demanded by thousands ponent of its ATLAS project, which documents all men- of individuals and their families. tal health resources globally [4]. ATLAS questionnaires The World Health Organisation (WHO) asserts that were sent to a mental health focal point at the Ministry of "without adequate financing, mental health policies and Health in 191 countries. The questionnaires contained plans remain in the realm of rhetoric and good inten- three queries relating to mental health financing: 1) Is tions" [3]. This bold stance sets the tone for the report there a national budget line for mental health? (and if so, how much?); 2) How are mental health services * Correspondence: [email protected] financed?; and 3) Is mental illness considered a disability 2 BasicNeeds, 158 A Parade, Leamington Spa, Warwickshire, UK Full list of author information is available at the end of the article for public disability benefits? © 2010 Raja et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons At- BioMed Central tribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Raja et al. International Journal of Mental Health Systems 2010, 4:11 Page 2 of 14 http://www.ijmhs.com/content/4/1/11 The results of ATLAS study, particularly in answer to health [6]. Given that these regions encompass some of the first question about budgeting, gave the first good the lowest income countries in the world, 1% percent picture of the status of mental health financing globally. amounts to a small portion of a small pie. Out of all the countries surveyed, one in three (32%, n = That 36% of countries spend less than 1% of their health 61) had no specific budget for mental health [5]. budgets on mental health, when mental disorders repre- Although 130 countries reported having a mental health sent 13% of the global burden of disease, points to a strik- budget, only 89 of them were able to provide information ing disconnect between disease burden and health about their mental health budget. Of those 89 providing spending. More striking is that 53% of countries (n = 102) budgetary information, one in three (36%, n = 32) spent provided no information about spending on mental less than 1% of their health budget on mental health. health [6]. This finding suggests one of three possibilities: The ATLAS findings on the small government alloca- 1. no information was available about mental health tions for mental health are corroborated by data on the financing in these countries; 2. Information about mental WHO's mental health budget. In 2006/07 the WHO allo- health financing exists but was not transparent; 3. mental cated only 0.8% of its total operating budget to mental health was not a high enough priority for ministries to health, amounting to a total of US $14.9 million per year respond to the WHO survey. In either case, it is clear that [6], despite that neuropsychiatric disorders represents more research is needed into mental health financing in 13% of disease burden [7]. Since the WHO reflects the low income countries. priorities of its member states, their budget serves as fur- ther evidence that mental health financing is not yet a WHO AIMS Data (Country Level) priority for most countries (refer to figure 1). Building on the preliminary evidence from the ATLAS Regionally, those spending proportionally the least on study, in 2005 the WHO launched a new tool, called the mental health in the ATLAS study were predominantly Assessment Instrument for Mental Health Systems located in Africa and South-East Asia. Seventy nine per- (AIMS) [8]. Unlike ATLAS, which was collected from all cent (79%) of African countries and 63% of Asian coun- countries for the purpose of creating a global evidence tries spent less than 1% of their health budgets on mental base about mental health resources, AIMS is collected Figure 1 Neuropsychiatric disorders as a percent of WHO programme budget vs. percent of disease burden. Raja et al. International Journal of Mental Health Systems 2010, 4:11 Page 3 of 14 http://www.ijmhs.com/content/4/1/11 only by interested countries at the request of their health roeconomics in Ghana found that unclear national mental ministry with technical support from the WHO. Consid- health priorities contributed to inadequate funding for erably more thorough than ATLAS, the AIMS process mental health services (Appiah Kubi et al., unpublished). involves contacting people from many levels within the This pressing need for mental health financing informa- health system and takes an estimated 6 months to con- tion in Africa has clear policy implications for individual duct, including quality checks from the WHO regional countries. office. The AIMS tool is constructed along six domains, Access to psychiatric medicines in Africa is hampered and mental health financing constitutes one facet of the by inadequate supply and the cost of out-of-pocket pay- domain on policy and legislation. Where ATLAS col- ments for medicines [12]. Some countries, such as lected information on three financing indicators, six indi- Ghana, rely completely on donor funding for psychiatric cators are collected by AIMS, namely: 1) mental health medicines. When medicine is unavailable in the public expenditures by the government health department; 2) sector, prescribers, dispensers and users turn to the pri- expenditures on mental hospitals; 3) mental disorders in vate sector for needed psychiatric drugs. A 2006 compar- social insurance schemes; 4) free access to essential psy- ative analysis on the affordability of chronic disease chotropic medicines; 5) affordability of antipsychotic medication revealed that the lowest paid unskilled gov- medication; and 6) affordability of antidepressant medi- ernment worker in Kenya would need to work 20.2 days cation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mental Health Crisis Services Promoting Person-Centred and Rights-Based Approaches
    Technical package Technical package Mental health crisis services Promoting person-centred and rights-based approaches I Technical package Mental health crisis services Promoting person-centred and rights-based approaches Mental health crisis services: promoting person-centred and rights-based approaches (Guidance and technical packages on community mental health services: promoting person-centred and rights-based approaches) ISBN 978-92-4-002572-1 (electronic version) ISBN 978-92-4-002573-8 (print version) © World Health Organization 2021 Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo). Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must license your work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a translation of this work, you should add the following disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the World Health Organization (WHO). WHO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition shall be the binding and authentic edition”. Any mediation relating to disputes arising under the licence shall be conducted in accordance with the mediation rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization (http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/mediation/rules/).
    [Show full text]
  • Basicneeds: Applying Community Development Principles to Address Mental Health Challenges
    Attachment G7 WORKING PAPER - DO NOT CITE OR DISTRIBUTE WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE AUTHORS CASE STUDY: BASICNEEDS: APPLYING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PRINCIPLES TO ADDRESS MENTAL HEALTH CHALLENGES Andrea Taylor, Innovations in Healthcare, Duke University Erin Escobar, Innovations in Healthcare, Duke University Krishna Udayakumar, Innovations in Healthcare, Duke University Prepared for: The Commonwealth Fund 2015 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON HEALTH CARE POLICY 1 Attachment G7 WORKING PAPER - DO NOT CITE OR DISTRIBUTE WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE AUTHORS Abstract: As the burden of mental illness grows worldwide, access to treatment is not keeping pace. The need is particularly acute in low-resource communities that lack the infrastructure and trained workforce to provide comprehensive treatment. Using a community development approach, BasicNeeds’ Model for Mental Health and Development leverages existing resources in new ways to increase access to and effectiveness of mental health services. By mobilizing and coordinating government agencies, community organizations, volunteers, and people with mental illness and their families, BasicNeeds programs drive local ownership and system change. The model, which has now used in 12 low-income countries in Africa and Asia, has demonstrated many positive impacts in access to treatment, mental health outcomes, quality of life, and engagement in income-generating work. It might also prove to be a cost-effective approach in U.S. communities for addressing disparities in access and lack of care coordination in mental health management. BACKGROUND Roughly 450 million people worldwide suffer from mental illness. Seventy-five percent live in the developing world, where extreme poverty exacerbates the issue. Mental health problems represent a growing share of the global disease burden, yet access to effective treatment models is not keeping pace.i Communities often lack infrastructure to provide effective management, and the available treatment is often insufficient, expensive, poorly funded, and located far from the need.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Mental Health Finances in Ghana, Uganda, Sri Lanka, India
    Raja et al. International Journal of Mental Health Systems 2010, 4:11 http://www.ijmhs.com/content/4/1/11 RESEARCH Open Access MappingResearch mental health finances in Ghana, Uganda, Sri Lanka, India and Lao PDR Shoba Raja1, Sarah K Wood1, Victoria de Menil*2 and Saju C Mannarath1 Abstract Background: Limited evidence about mental health finances in low and middle-income countries is a key challenge to mental health care policy initiatives. This study aimed to map mental health finances in Ghana, Uganda, India (Kerala state), Sri Lanka and Lao PDR focusing on how much money is available for mental health, how it is spent, and how this impacts mental health services. Methods: A researcher in each region reviewed public mental health-related budgets and interviewed key informants on government mental health financing. A total of 43 key informant interviews were conducted. Quantitative data was analyzed in an excel matrix using descriptive statistics. Key informant interviews were coded a priori against research questions. Results: National ring-fenced budgets for mental health as a percentage of national health spending for 2007-08 is 1.7% in Sri Lanka, 3.7% in Ghana, 2.0% in Kerala (India) and 6.6% in Uganda. Budgets were not available in Lao PDR. The majority of ring-fenced budgets (76% to 100%) is spent on psychiatric hospitals. Mental health spending could not be tracked beyond the psychiatric hospital level due to limited information at the health centre and community levels. Conclusions: Mental health budget information should be tracked and made publically accessible. Governments can adapt WHO AIMS indicators for reviewing national mental health finances.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mental Health System in Ghana
    The mental health system in Ghana Full Report Based on a survey conducted in 2012 using the World Health Organisation Assessment Instrument for Mental Health Systems (WHO-AIMS) for the year 2011. Published on behalf of The Ghana Ministry of Health by the Kintampo Project. Authors Dr Mark Roberts Professor Joseph B Asare Caroline Mogan Dr Emmanuel T Adjase Dr Akwasi Osei Published: June 2013 Authors Dr Mark Roberts Professor Joseph B Asare Dr Caroline Mogan Dr Emmanual T Adjase Dr Akwasi Osei Published: Spring 2013 www.moh-ghana.org www.thekintampoproject.org Full report from the survey conducted The mental health using the World Health Organisation Assessment Instrument for Mental Health Systems (WHO-AIMS) during system in Ghana 2011. Published in June 2013. All contents © The Kintampo Project 2013, all rights reserved. Note: data in this report will be subject to academic publication by the authors. THE MENTAL HEALTH SYSTEM IN GHANA | 2011 / 2012 Contents Foreword 6 Legal status of admissions to mental health services 25 Acknowledgments 7 Equity of distribution of inpatient beds 25 Number of patients treated 26 Executive Summary 8 Mental Health Services: Summary charts and tables 27 Introduction 13 3: Mental health in primary health care 34 Training in mental health care for primary care staff 34 Results 15 Mental health service provision in primary health care 35 Informal primary health care (faith-based 1: Policy, legislative framework, and traditional practitioners) 35 financing and human rights 16 Prescription in primary health care
    [Show full text]
  • Health, Resilience, and Human Security: Moving Toward Health for All
    HEALTH, RESILIENCE, AND HUMAN SECURITY: MOVING TOWARD HEALTH FOR ALL Marcelo Korc, Susan Hubbard, Tomoko Suzuki, and Masamine Jimba Copyright © 2016 Japan Center for International Exchange and Pan American Health Organization All rights reserved. Printed in the United States. ISBN:978-4-88907-147-4 Copyediting by Kimberly Gould Ashizawa. Cover design and typesetting by Patrick Ishiyama. Cover photographs by kovgabor / Shutterstock.com, Franco Volpato / Shutterstock.com, and Nguyen Anh Tuan / Shutterstock.com. Publication is available on the JCIE/USA website (www.jcie.org) and the PAHO website (www.paho.org). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate this publication should be addressed to JCIE/USA, 135 West 29th Street, Suite 303, New York, NY 10001 USA, or to the Communication Department (CMU), Pan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, USA (www.paho.org/publications/copyright-forms). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Japan Center for International Exchange and/or the Pan American Health Organization concern- ing the legal status of any country, territory, city, or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the Japan Center for International Exchange and/or the Pan American Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distin- guished by initial capital letters.
    [Show full text]
  • MENTAL HEALTH GAP ACTION PROGRAMME (Mhgap)
    MENTAL HEALTH GAP ACTION PROGRAMME (mhGAP) 3rd meeting of the mhGAP Forum ANNEX E Submissions from the participating organizations 64 Great Suffolk Street London SE1 0BL United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0)20 7981 0880 ADI Submission for mhGAP Forum Fax: +44 (0)20 7928 2357 Geneva, 10 October 2011 Email: [email protected] Web: www.alz.co.uk Alzheimer’s Disease International (ADI) is the worldwide federation of 76 Alzheimer associations. ADI’s mission is to strengthen and support Alzheimer associations and raise awareness about dementia worldwide, to improve the knowledge of and information on risk factors, and to make dementia a global health priority. Our vision is an improved quality of life for people with dementia and their families throughout the world. ADI has commissioned three reports on global dementia, the World Alzheimer Report 2009, with the latest prevalence data and information about the impact of the disease. The World Alzheimer Report 2010 contains the global economic impact of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. The World Alzheimer Report 2011 on the Benefits of Early Diagnosis and Intervention shows that (early) diagnosis and intervention do matter, but many people do not receive any diagnosis, so there is a treatment gap for both medical and non-medical interventions. We welcome the priority that is given to dementia in the Mental Health GAP programme and promote the programme where we can. There are still governments in the world who – wrongly – think that dementia does not occur in their country. This programme gives a unique opportunity to improve the quality of life of people with dementia and their families.
    [Show full text]
  • Bond Report and Financial Statements 2015–2016
    Company number: 3395681 Charity Number: 1068839 British Overseas NGOs for Development (BOND) Report and financial statements For the year ended 31 March 2016 British Overseas NGOs for Development (BOND) Contents For the year ended 31st March 2016 Reference and administrative information ...................................................................................... 1 Trustees’ annual report .................................................................................................................. 3 Independent auditor's report ........................................................................................................ 23 Statement of financial activities (incorporating an income and expenditure account) ................... 25 Balance sheet ............................................................................................................................... 26 Notes to the financial statements ................................................................................................. 28 British Overseas NGOs for Development (BOND) Reference and administrative information For the year ended 31st March 2016 Company number 3395681 Charity number 1068839 Registered office and operational address Society Building 8 All Saints Street London N1 9RL British Overseas NGOs for development (BOND) Trustees Trustees, who are also directors under company law, who served during the year and up to the date of this report were as follows: Timothy Wainwright Chair Gibril Faal Vice Chair Caroline Nursey Vice Chair
    [Show full text]
  • Basicneeds Skoll Awardee Profile
    BasicNeeds Skoll Awardee Profile Organization Overview Key Info Social Entrepreneur Chris Underhill Year Awarded 2013 Issue Area Addressed Health, Peace and Human Rights Sub Issue Area Addressed Health Delivery, Human Rights Countries Served China, Ghana, India, Kenya, Nepal, Nigeria, Pakistan, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, Uganda, United Kingdom, Vietnam Website http://www.basicneeds.org Twitter handle BasicNeedsIntl Facebook https://www.facebook.com/BasicNeedsIntl About the Organization BasicNeeds is an international NGO that was founded in 2000 by Chris Underhill with the aim of bringing about a lasting change in the lives of mentally ill people around the world. BasicNeeds seeks to enable people with mental illness or epilepsy and their families to live and work successfully in their communities by combining health, socio-economic, and community- oriented solutions with changes in policy, practice, and resource allocation. Using Chris’ Model for Mental Health and Development, BasicNeeds helps mentally ill people by providing them with access to regular community-based treatment, along with with livelihood support and initiatives to overcome stigma and abuse. By building up the capacity of existing services in a country and simultaneously nurturing self- help groups, the Model has been tested and proven in 12 countries and adapted to a variety of settings. BasicNeeds’ vision is of a world in which the basic needs of all people with mental illness and epilepsy are met, and their basic rights are recognized and respected. Impact Increased the cumulative number of beneficiaries to 580,000. 94 percent of mentally ill people in communities served have access to treatment, and 70 percent report reduced symptoms.
    [Show full text]
  • 9789241506793 Eng.Pdf
    WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data: Integrating the response to mental disorders and other chronic diseases in health care systems. 1.Mental Disorders. 2.Mental Health Services. 3.Chronic Disease. 4.Delivery of Health Care, Integrated. I.World Health Organization. ISBN 978 92 4 150679 3 (NLM classification: WM 101) © World Health Organization 2014 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization are available on the WHO website (www.who.int) or can be purchased from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; e-mail: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications –whether for sale or for non-commercial distribution– should be addressed to WHO Press through the WHO website (www.who.int/about/licensing/ copyright_form/en/index.html). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expres- sion of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are en- dorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters.
    [Show full text]
  • Briefing for Country Campaigns on Mental Health Current and Prospective Donors
    Briefing for Country Campaigns on Mental Health Current and Prospective Donors Purpose This is a paper outlining donors that country campaigners may like to note for: 1. Potential direct applications for funding by country campaigns 2. Potential applications for funding (that require partnership with donor country- based Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) 3. Recommendations to lower-middle income country (LMIC) governments on which donors to apply for funding for government or multi-stakeholder managed mental health programmes. For each donor, it includes priority areas and focus countries, recommendations and links for further information. Private Donors (Private donors that we know fund CSOs and campaigns, on a range of issues) National Lottery Distribution Trust Fund (South Africa) has supported the South Africa Federation for Mental Health (SAFMH). To see if your organisation is eligible for funding, visit their website. Focus Vulnerable groups, home-based care, disability, community health. Priority Countries or Region South Africa only. Accepting Grants At the start of every financial year (1 April – 31 March) a Applications? list of priority funding areas for that year is published. However applications are accepted throughout the year. Relevant Websites How to apply for funding 1 Comic Relief Comic Relief supports the work of United for Global Mental Health with campaign support, provided funding for Global Mental Health Peer Network, MIND UK, and for some Speak Your Mind (SYM) campaigns. To see if your organisation is eligible for other funding, visit their website. Focus Global mental health, children survive and thrive, education in emergencies. Priority Countries or Region Bangladesh, Ghana, India, Kenya, Malawi, Nepal, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Rwanda, Tanzania, Uganda, all four nations of the United Kingdom, Zambia and Zimbabwe.
    [Show full text]
  • Series China–India Mental Health Alliance the Magnitude of And
    Series China–India Mental Health Alliance The magnitude of and health system responses to the mental health treatment gap in adults in India and China Vikram Patel, Shuiyuan Xiao, Hanhui Chen, Fahmy Hanna, A T Jotheeswaran, Dan Luo, Rachana Parikh, Eesha Sharma, Shamaila Usmani, Yu Yu, Benjamin G Druss, Shekhar Saxena This Series paper describes the first systematic effort to review the unmet mental health needs of adults in China and Published Online India. The evidence shows that contact coverage for the most common mental and substance use disorders is very low. May 18, 2016 Effective coverage is even lower, even for severe disorders such as psychotic disorders and epilepsy. There are vast http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S0140-6736(16)00160-4 variations across the regions of both countries, with the highest treatment gaps in rural regions because of inequities This paper forms part of the in the distribution of mental health resources, and variable implementation of mental health policies across states and China–India Mental Health provinces. Human and financial resources for mental health are grossly inadequate with less than 1% of the national Alliance Series. Other papers in health-care budget allocated to mental health in either country. Although China and India have both shown renewed the series are available at commitment through national programmes for community-oriented mental health care, progress in achieving http://www.thelancet.com/ series/china-india-mental-health coverage is far more substantial in China. Improvement of coverage will need to address both supply-side barriers and London School of Hygiene & demand-side barriers related to stigma and varying explanatory models of mental disorders.
    [Show full text]
  • Disability Knowledge & Research Programme
    DFID AND DISABILITY A Mapping of the Department for International Development and Disability Issues Philippa Thomas, Disability Policy Officer June 2004 CONTENTS Acronyms Disclaimer Executive Summary 1. Introduction DFID Disability Knowledge and Research Programme Aims and Scope of the Study Methodology Outline Acknowledgements 2. DFID Policy and Disability UN Standard Rules UK Disability Discrimination Act DFID’s Policy on Disability in its International Development Activities Social Exclusion 3. Snapshot of DFID’s Support to Disability Issues Background Disability and DFID’s Multi-lateral Aid Programme World Bank Asian Development Bank United Nations Development Programme UNICEF World Health Organisation European Union Disability and DFID’s Bilateral Aid Programme Asia Division Africa Divison Europe, Middle East and the Americas Division Regional and Country Assistance Plans Conflict and Humanitarian Affairs Department Policy Division Central Research Department Support to Disability via NGOs and CSOs Partnership Programme Agreements Civil Society Challenge Fund Development Awareness Fund 4. Case Studies Case Study 1: Partnership Programme Agreement with Action on Disability and Development Case Study 2: Disability Projects in Samara, Russia Case Study 3:Civil Society Challenge Fund Project Disability Specific Case Study 4: Ghana Case Study 5: India Case Study 6: Cambodia DFID and Disability Mapping Report www.disabilitykar.net 2 5. DFID Staff and Disability Knowledge about disability Disability and DFID’s work Awareness of the 2000
    [Show full text]