Genealogical, Historical Biographical

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Genealogical, Historical Biographical Genealogical, Historical and· Biographical EDITED BY WILLIAM MONTGOMERY CLEMENS VOLUMES ONE AND TWO 1916,, 1917 WIWAM M. CLEMENS PUBLISHER NEW YORK PRINCIPAL CONTENTS Page Delaware Wills 8 Illinois Marriages 128 Indiana Marriages ........................-·. 108-12-4: Irish Montgomeries . 6 James Montgomery, Letters of . 49 Kentucky Marriages 90 Maryland Marriages 56 Massachusetts Marriages . 69 Mississippi Marriages 123 Montgomery Lines of Descent . 41-112 New England Marriages . 2 O New Jersey Marriages . 7 7 New Jersey Wills .' . 2 2 New York Marriages ..... : . 4 7 North Carolina Marriages . 7-5 8 Ohio Marriages . 2 5 Pennsylvania Land Warrants . 61 Pennsylvania Marriages . 37-53-96 Pennsylvania Wills . 3-51-111 Philadelphia Marriages . 122 Revolutionary Records . 81 Robert Montgomery and his Descendants . 97 South Carolina Families . 3 3 Virginia Montgomeries . 6"5 Virginia Marriages . 9~84 The Montgomery Family MAGAZINE JULY 1915 THE HOUSE OF MONTGOMERY. No American family can proclaim a n1ore distin­ guished or more ancient lineage than the l\tontgom­ erys. The founder of the line in America, William Montgomerie, settled in East Jersey in 1701-02, but the pedigree is easily traceable many generations back of that period; indeed, fully a thousand years beyond the present year of grace. The earliest record of the family extend to Roger de Montgomerie, a native of Neustria, who was °Count of Montgomerie before coming of Rollo" in 912. Though of French extraction the Montgomeries thus became absorbed in and assimilated with the Norman dynasty, which was established by Duke Rollo, fol­ lowing his descent upon and capture of that section of the domain of Charles the Simple. Count William de Montgomerie and Hugh de Montgomerie, his brother, great-grandsons of the Roger de Montgomerie above mentioned, are thus spoken of by Ordericus Vitalis: 0 William and Hugh, the two sons of Roger de Montgomerie, were turbulent during Duke William's m1nonty.• • •• Ordericus furthermore accuses the elder of the brothers of having assassinated Osbeme de Crepon, High Steward of Normandy. The assault is said to have taken place while the victim was sleeping in the chamber of Duke William, who was then a minor. For this act he received speedy vengeance, as Bamon de Glos, Osbeme' s steward, surrounded William in his castle, and, setting fire to it, destroyed him and all his accomplices. 1 Montgomery Family Hugh de Montgomerie, son of William de Mont­ gomerie, married Osberne' s cousin Josseline, daughter of Tourode, Sire de Pont Audemer, whose wife, Weva Duceline de Crepon, was a sister of Duchess Gonnor, wife of Richard Sans Peur, the great-grandmother of William the Conqueror. The eldest son of Hugh de Montgomerie, namely, Roger de Montgomerie, Count of Montgomerie, and Viscount d'Exmes, accompanied his cousin, William of Normandy, in his invasion of England, and, at the battle of Hastings, October 14, 1066, is said to have commanded the advance division of the Norman army. Thus the Montgomeries found foothold in the British Isles, and the English, Scottish and Irish branches of the family extended and developed. In diplomacy, literature, journalism and religion the name has ever since been more or less prominent. The poet and hymn writer, the Rev. James Montgomery, ranks high among English men of letters. In our own country, from the days of Colonel Richard Montgomery, of heroic memory, the name has been one of the highest type and character. In American Colonial records the Montgomerys; of New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Kentucky were among those who made history, and they were foremost among the pioneers who blazed the way through the wilderness of the new world. The descendants of the first American Montgom­ erys now number many thousands, and this modest little chronicle will endeavor from time to time to per­ petuate the history, the song, the story and the ro­ mance surrounding this distinguished family. Many priceless Colonial records have been lost to literature, but with the hope that much of the Montgomery tra­ dition, record and fact can still be found available and preserved for future generations this publication is undertaken. W. M. C. 2 Montgomery Family EARLY PENNSYLVANIA WILLS. (From original records) Montgomery, Archibald, of Perry Township, Lancas­ ter, Pa., 25 December, 1 773. Probated 21 June, 1774: To son Archibald. To daughter Mary. To daughter, wife of Robert Walker. To daughter, wife of Samuel Hannah. Montgomery, Christina, widow of Robert, Sunbury, Pa., 5 February, 1815. To sons Robert, John, William and David. To grandson William, son of William. To Robert's daughter, Christina. To daughter Jane, wife of Rev. John Bryson. To daughter Margaret, wife of William Gallahan. Montgomery, Jane, of the town of Milton, Sunbury, Pa., 1 August, 1806. To daughter Sarah, wife of George Whitehill. To daughter Mary, wife of Thomas Bull. To daughter Nancy. To son Robert and son James Moody Montgom- ery. To Peggy and Dorcas. To my sister Nancy Porter. To my sister Mary Hall. Montgomery, John, of Lurgan Township, Carlisle, Pa., 21 July, 1779. To brothers Thomas, Robert, William and Hum­ phrey. To sister Elizabeth, wife of James Smith. Montgomery, John, of T urbutt Township, Northum­ berland County, Sunbury, Pa., 12 Decem­ ber, 1792. To wife Christina. To sons Robert, John and David. To daughter Jane. To daughter Margaret. To youngest daughter Sarah. 3 Montgomery Family Montgomery, John, of Carlisle, Pa., 18 September, 1800. To wife Sarah. To daughter Sydney. To daughter Esther, wife of James Morrison. To daughter Jean, wife of Samuel Edmiston. To son John. To son Dr. William. To daughter Sarah, wife of David Hanis. To grandson John, son of Samuel Edmiston. Montgomery, Mary, of Little Britain, Lancaster, Pa., 21 May, 1 788. Probated 22 June, 1 788. To granddaughter Elizabeth McClain. To son-in-law John McClain. To grandson William McClain. To sons Moses and Robert. Montgomery, Robert, of Lancaster County, 6 October, 1748. To son John. To wife Elizabeth. To sons-in-law Eugene Tolan, Robert Clark and George Clark. To daughter Rebecca Lee. To Thomas Dyerman. Montgomery, Robert, of Paxton Township, Lancaster, Pa., 29 November, 1774. To wife Sarah. To daughter Mary Dunken. To daughter Elizabeth Gallacher. To sons John, Hugh and David. Montgomery, Samuel, of Hopewell Township, Cum­ berland County, Carlisle, Pa., 20 February, 1765. To wife Hannah. To nephew Thomas. Montgomery, Sarah, of ·Lancaster, Pa., 31 August, 1784. Probated 9 December, 1784. To sons David, William and John. To daughter Mary Duncan. 4 Montgomery Family To daughter Elizabeth Gallacher. To granddaughter Sarah Gallacher. To Hugh's daughter Mary. Montgomery, Thomas, of Little Britain, Lancaster, Pa., 5 September, 1 770. To my daughter Jean Montgomery Campbell. To grandson Thomas Campbell. To granddaughter Rebecca Campbell. rt1ontgomery, Thomas, of Newton Township, Carlisle, Pa., 14 March, 1 781. To wife Susannah. To daughter Margaret. To grandson Thomas. To granddaughter Mary. To son William. To Sarah and Mary, daughters of my son An­ drew. Montgomery, William, of Little Britain, Lancaster, Pa., 7 April, 1782. Probated 20 June, 1782. To wife Mary. To grandson William Montgomery. To umy negro boy Pompey." To grandson William McClean. To daughter Agnes McClean. To son David. Montgomery, William, cf Carlisle, Pa., 15 November, 1806. To wife Margaret. To my five daughters Susan, Ann, Rebecca, El­ lenor and Elizabeth. To grandson William Montgomery Holmes. Mcntgomery, William, of Turbutt Township, Sunbury, Pa., 22 September, 1828. To sons John and William. To daughter Nancy. Rev. Joseph Montgomery was preaching at Lima­ ville, Stark County, Ohio. in 1840. 5 Montgomery Family THE IRISH MONTGOMERYS. Mr. Lothrop Withington, a well-known genealo­ gist of Boston, many years of whose life was spent in England and Ireland, was one of the ill-fated passen­ gers on the steamship "Lusitania." Mr. Withington some years prior to his death had made extensive genealogical researches in Ireland, and to the Mont­ gomery family he paid a glowing tribute. In these days of wars and rumors of wars, of fighting nations and fighting men, some words con­ cerning the Montgomeries, penned by the late Mr. Withington, will be read with more than the ordinary interest. Of the Montgomeries of the north of Scot­ land he wrote: "In my notes from Irish records, gathered by me incidentally in the course of many years' occasional research in Dublin and elsewhere, concerning various Ulster emigrant families the first and most important is the connection of our famous General Richard Mont­ gomery. As a fact, the Montgomeries overshadow the whole of Ulster, just as the Fitzgeralds do the rest of Ireland. It is said that Lord Mount Alexander at one time could ride at the head of a regiment all Mont­ gomeries. In the last Irish Parliament were no less than five Montgomeries, the handsomest men not only in the Parliament but in Ireland, according to tradi­ tion. The ramifications of the Ulster Montgomeries are endless.'• In the Washington County, Pa., Rangers, 1778 to 1783, were William, Alexander, Thomas and John Montgomery. At the same time Samuel Montgomery was in the ranks of the Bedford County, Pa., Rangers. In Cumberland County were Samuel, William and Au­ gust. In Northumberland County were Samuel and William. :f. :f. :f. Among the U. S. pensioners in 1833 was Thomrui Montgomery, of Nelson County, Ky., aged 84 years. 6 Montgomery Family NORTH CAROLINA MARRIAGE BONDS. Mecklenburg County. August 1, 1795-John Montgomery to Mary Clark. January 8, 1800-James Montgomery to Rebekah Clark. February 26, 1802-John Montgomery to Margaret Begett ( or Buhet) . November 15, 1804-Robert Montgomery to Elianor McCleary. March 28, 181 2-Samuel Montgomery to Rachel Clark. , July 14, 1827-John Montgomery to Mary Wiley. December 27, 1831-John H. Montgomery to Han­ nah E. Moore. April 15, 1846-Wilson Montgomery to Mary A.
Recommended publications
  • University of Oklahoma Graduate College
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE SCIENCE IN THE AMERICAN STYLE, 1700 – 1800 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By ROBYN DAVIS M CMILLIN Norman, Oklahoma 2009 SCIENCE IN THE AMERICAN STYLE, 1700 – 1800 A DISSERTATION APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BY ________________________ Prof. Paul A. Gilje, Chair ________________________ Prof. Catherine E. Kelly ________________________ Prof. Judith S. Lewis ________________________ Prof. Joshua A. Piker ________________________ Prof. R. Richard Hamerla © Copyright by ROBYN DAVIS M CMILLIN 2009 All Rights Reserved. To my excellent and generous teacher, Paul A. Gilje. Thank you. Acknowledgements The only thing greater than the many obligations I incurred during the research and writing of this work is the pleasure that I take in acknowledging those debts. It would have been impossible for me to undertake, much less complete, this project without the support of the institutions and people who helped me along the way. Archival research is the sine qua non of history; mine was funded by numerous grants supporting work in repositories from California to Massachusetts. A Friends Fellowship from the McNeil Center for Early American Studies supported my first year of research in the Philadelphia archives and also immersed me in the intellectual ferment and camaraderie for which the Center is justly renowned. A Dissertation Fellowship from the Gilder Lehrman Institute for American History provided months of support to work in the daunting Manuscript Division of the New York Public Library. The Chandis Securities Fellowship from the Huntington Library, Art Collections, and Botanical Gardens brought me to San Marino and gave me entrée to an unequaled library of primary and secondary sources, in one of the most beautiful spots on Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • New York Genealogical and Biographical Record, Vol 21
    K<^' ^ V*^'\^^^ '\'*'^^*/ \'^^-\^^^'^ V' ar* ^ ^^» "w^^^O^o a • <L^ (r> ***^^^>^^* '^ "h. ' ^./ ^^0^ Digitized by the internet Archive > ,/- in 2008 with funding from ' A^' ^^ *: '^^'& : The Library of Congress r^ .-?,'^ httpy/www.archive.org/details/pewyorkgepealog21 newy THE NEW YORK Genealogical\nd Biographical Record. DEVOTED TO THE INTERESTS OF AMERICAN GENEALOGY AND BIOGRAPHY. ISSUED QUARTERLY. VOLUME XXL, 1890. 868; PUBLISHED BY THE SOCIETY, Berkeley Lyceuim, No. 23 West 44TH Street, NEW YORK CITY. 4125 PUBLICATION COMMITTEE: Rev. BEVERLEY R. BETTS, Chairman. Dr. SAMUEL S. PURPLE.. Gen. JAS. GRANT WILSON. Mr. THOS. G. EVANS. Mr. EDWARD F. DE LANCEY. Mr. WILLL\M P. ROBINSON. Press of J. J. Little & Co., Astor Place, New York. INDEX OF SUBJECTS. Albany and New York Records, 170. Baird, Charles W., Sketch of, 147. Bidwell, Marshal] S., Memoir of, i. Brookhaven Epitaphs, 63. Cleveland, Edmund J. Captain Alexander Forbes and his Descendants, 159. Crispell Family, 83. De Lancey, Edward F. Memoir of Marshall S. Bidwell, i. De Witt Family, 185. Dyckman Burial Ground, 81. Edsall, Thomas H. Inscriptions from the Dyckman Burial Ground, 81. Evans, Thomas G. The Crispell Family, 83. The De Witt Family, 185. Fernow, Berlhold. Albany and New York Records, 170 Fishkill and its Ancient Church, 52. Forbes, Alexander, 159. Heermans Family, 58. Herbert and Morgan Records, 40. Hoes, R. R. The Negro Plot of 1712, 162. Hopkins, Woolsey R Two Old New York Houses, 168. Inscriptions from Morgan Manor, N. J. , 112. John Hart, the Signer, 36. John Patterson, by William Henry Lee, 99. Jones, William Alfred. The East in New York, 43. Kelby, William.
    [Show full text]
  • We Remember Them
    We Remember Them september 2019 yale university We Remember Them Included in these pages are remembrances written about our First Women classmates who have died since we arrived at Yale in September 1969. Reading about the lives they lived and the people and communities they touched is humbling. Remembering shared experiences from our days together at Yale and in the years after is bittersweet. Life is short, and we do not have much time to gladden the hearts of those who make the journey with us. So be swift to love and make haste to be kind. Jane Curtis ’73 by Lawrie Mifflin ’73 Jane had a wonderful smile, one that stretched into almost- dimples and made you eager to conspire with her. She first flashed it my way when we were 18, in the summer of 1969, at a fancy Philadelphia Yale Club reception for students newly admitted to Yale. Jane and I might have been the only girls in the room; I can’t remember. But I do remember we had two things in common—we were both Quakers, and we both loved to play field hockey—and we felt relieved to know that when we got to New Haven and Vanderbilt Hall, at least we’d have one sure friend. Little did we know that our field hockey bond would lead us to make Yale history. When we tried to find out how to join the Yale team, we learned there wasn’t one. Nor were there any teams, or even plans for teams, in any sport for women.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom of the Press: Croswell's Case
    Fordham Law Review Volume 33 Issue 3 Article 3 1965 Freedom of the Press: Croswell's Case Morris D. Forkosch Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Morris D. Forkosch, Freedom of the Press: Croswell's Case, 33 Fordham L. Rev. 415 (1965). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol33/iss3/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Freedom of the Press: Croswell's Case Cover Page Footnote The instant study was initiated by Professor Vincent C. Hopkins, S.J., of the Department of History, Fordham University, during 1963. In the spring of 1964 be died, leaving an incomplete draft; completion necessitated research, correction, and re-writing almost entirely, to the point where it became an entirly new paper, and the manuscript was ready for printing when the first olumev of Professor Goebel's, The Law Practice of Alexander Hamilton (1964), appeared. At pages 775-SO6 Goebel gives the background of the Croswell case and, because of many details and references there appearing, the present article has been slimmed down considerably. However, the point of view adopted by Goebel is to give the background so that Hamilton's participation and argument can be understood. The purpose of the present article is to disclose the place occupied by this case (and its participants) in the stream of American libertarian principles, and ezpzdally those legal concepts which prevented freedom of the press from becoming an everyday actuality until the legislatures changed the common law.
    [Show full text]
  • Butlers of the Mohawk Valley: Family Traditions and the Establishment of British Empire in Colonial New York
    Syracuse University SURFACE Dissertations - ALL SURFACE December 2015 Butlers of the Mohawk Valley: Family Traditions and the Establishment of British Empire in Colonial New York Judd David Olshan Syracuse University Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/etd Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Olshan, Judd David, "Butlers of the Mohawk Valley: Family Traditions and the Establishment of British Empire in Colonial New York" (2015). Dissertations - ALL. 399. https://surface.syr.edu/etd/399 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the SURFACE at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations - ALL by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract: Butlers of the Mohawk Valley: Family Traditions and the Establishment of British Empire in Colonial New York Historians follow those tributaries of early American history and trace their converging currents as best they may in an immeasurable river of human experience. The Butlers were part of those British imperial currents that washed over mid Atlantic America for the better part of the eighteenth century. In particular their experience reinforces those studies that recognize the impact that the Anglo-Irish experience had on the British Imperial ethos in America. Understanding this ethos is as crucial to understanding early America as is the Calvinist ethos of the Massachusetts Puritan or the Republican ethos of English Wiggery. We don't merely suppose the Butlers are part of this tradition because their story begins with Walter Butler, a British soldier of the Imperial Wars in America.
    [Show full text]
  • Columbia Law Review
    COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW VOL. 94 JUNE 1994 NO. 5 CONSIDERING ZENGER: PARTISAN POLITICS AND THE LEGAL PROFESSION IN PROVINCIAL NEW YORK Eben Moglen* I. THE STORY OF A GOLD Box History is the narration of the past, and not all valuable history is true. When William Smith, Jr. first wrote his much-admired and widely- distributed Histary of the Province of New-York, in 1756, he ended his narra- tion twenty-four years before his own time, with the arrival of Governor William Cosby in New York on August 1, 1732. In justification of his ab- rupt termination at this particular point, Smith wrote: The history of our publick transactions, from this period, to the present time, is full of important and entertaining events, which I leave others to relate. A very near relation to the authour had so great a concern in the publick controversies with Colonel Cosby, that the history of those times will be better received from a more disinterested pen. To suppress truth on the one hand, or exaggerate it, on the other, are both inexcusable faults, and perhaps it would be difficult for me to avoid those extremes. ' In his twenty-ninth year, already an important and rising member of the New York Bar, Smith was unwilling to describe the role played by his fa- ther, still living and soon-in 1760-to refuse the ChiefJusticeship of the Province, in the political turmoil of the Cosby Administration. To mod- ern readers, trained to view those times through the lens of a single fa- mous event, William Smith, Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Directory of Ayrshire Well Known That Tea Draws Better in a Silver Pot, and Drinks Pleasanter in a China Cup, Than out of Any Other Kind of Cup Or 1750-1800
    95 this was not done, as she assured me, in a vain spirit of bravery, which I could not have abided, but because it was Directory of Ayrshire well known that tea draws better in a silver pot, and drinks pleasanter in a china cup, than out of any other kind of cup or 1750-1800. teapot. JOHN GALT, Annals of the Parish, Year 1779. ' ' (With contributions from Sir James Fergusson, Bart.) Page A NEW SPIRIT Lord Lieutenants 96 But, in the midst of all this commercing and manufacturing, Sheriffs gg I began to discover signs of decay in the wonted simplicity of our country ways. Among the cotton-spinners and muslin weavers Peers QQ of CayenneviUe were several unsatisfied and ambitious spirits, Members of Parliament 99 who clubbed together, and got a London newspaper to the Cross- Keys, where they were nightly in the habit of meeting and Freeholders IQI debating about the affaks of the French, which were then gathering towards a head. They were represented to me as lads Numbers of voters (p. 102) ; Lists for 1759 (p. 102), by common in capacity, but with unsettled notions of religion. and for 1774 (p. 107). They were, however, quiet and orderly ; and some of them since, at Glasgow, Paisley, and Manchester, even, I am told, in London, Kirk of Scotland : Parish Ministers 113 have grown into a topping way. Presbytery of Irvine (p. 114) ; Presbytery of Ayr It seems they did not lilie my manner of preaching, and (p. 118); Presbytery of Stramaer (p. 125). on that account absented themselves from public worship; which, when I heard, I sent for some of them, to convince Other Churches 125 them of their error with regard to the truth of divers points of doctrine; but they confounded me with their objections, Cameronians (p.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Roadsides in New Jersey
    Presented to the Rxngwood Public Library FOR REFERENCE SE? 2 8 199! NOT TO BE TAKEN FROM THE ROOM CAT. NO. 23J RINGWOOD PUBLIC LIBRARY, NJ 3 6047 09044956 1 HISTORIC ROADSIDES if A Condensed Description of the ] I Principal Colonial and Revolu- I tionaryLandmarks in Newjersey, II arranged for the Convenience of K^ Students and Motorists. The Society of Colonial Wars in the State of New Jersey 1928 For Purchase of Copies Address WALTER LESTER GLENNEY, ESQ., Secretary 916 Madison Avenue Plainfield, N. J. Copyright 1928 The Society of Colonial Wars in the Stci tc of New Jersey Press oj Innes & Sons Philadelphia PREFACE N the foreword of "The First Americans" the Editors say, "The beginning of the thirteen English Colonies, so big I with destiny, have stirred the reverent curiosity of Ameri' can historians generation after generation." It is one of the ob' jects of the Society of Colonial Wars to promote an interest in and knowledge of Colonial history, not only by historians but by the ordinary man who professes that he has no time to devote to things that are past. In this day when distance is made unimportant by the motor vehicle, and we can in a day cover a mileage, which would have taken many days in Colonial times, there is no excuse for unfamiliarity or lack of knowledge of the historic spots in one's own State. When the State is one with a his- tory so fascinating and so closely connected with our National history, there is even less excuse for ignorance.
    [Show full text]
  • Port. Annapolis Was a Colonial Seaport of Some Repute
    INGIN THE PORT OF ANNAPOLIS 1748 - 1775 1- : /''' •• . Certeyne places for the unladeing & selling of all goods Charles Calvert Compass rose on cover after a rose by S. Emery. Courtesy of Peabody Museum of Salem. Sea Power Monograph Number 1 SHIPPING IN Copyright © 1965 , h United States Naval Institute ^s^&tSSp^. T'TTT"' T>/""fc TT'T' /^r Annapolis, Maryland. "^£2£?mj}L tltL MTUIVI \J t awary of congress m^k^Salt by Vaughan W. Brown Catalogue Card Number 64-25867. ANNAPOLIS Printed in U.S.A. 1748-1775 This monograph is a summary of intensive research into documentary and second­ ary source materials pertinent to the history of maritime trade and commerce in the port of Annapolis, Maryland, during the third quarter of the eighteenth century. The research project was a part of the general study of the historic port area of the city of Annapolis, sponsored by The Old Dominion Foundation through a grant made in I960 to Historic Annapolis Inc. Early in the study period, the staff of Historic Annapolis Inc. was made aware of the wealth of documentary source materials that exists in the collections of the Maryland Hall of Records. In spite of the existence of unusually complete and informative manuscript sources, relatively little was available in published form that could be called "definitive" in terms of maritime activity in the historic port. Annapolis was a colonial seaport of some repute. Generally, it was held that the city's importance as a seaport was largely based on trade in tobacco. But the details of the tobacco trade, the variety of import and export items that passed through the Port of Entry, the volume of shipping that Annapolis had enjoyed in the eighteenth century, and the routes and ports of call of vessels trading out of the port had never been correlated.
    [Show full text]
  • The Controversy Surrounding Bewitched and Harry Potter Natalie
    Georgia Institute of Technology Which Witch? The Controversy Surrounding Bewitched and Harry Potter Natalie F. Turbiville Department of History, Technology, and Society Georgia Institute of Technology Undergraduate Thesis Friday, April 25, 2008 Advisor: Dr. Douglas Flamming Second Reader: Dr. August Giebelhaus 2 Abstract Beginning in 1999, J.K. Rowling began to receive criticism about her Harry Potter series, which was first published in 1997. Christian Fundamentalists in opposition to the books argued that occult themes present in the series were harmful to the spiritual development of children. Those in opposition cited the negative response to the popular TV series Bewitched during its initial airing in the 1960s as grounds for rejecting Harry Potter . This connection was made because the popular television series and the successful book series both contained witchcraft elements; however, this connection is false. Primary sources show that Bewitched was not challenged based on the issue of witchcraft during its initial airing in the 1960s and 1970s. Despite modern Christian fundamentalists’ claims, the modern negative response to Bewitched is built on contemporary reflection. When Christian fundamentalists seek to prove that their outcry against the witchcraft used in Harry Potter is not unique it is suggested that America had rejected a form of media based on witchcraft when the public spoke out against Bewitched in the 1960s. In fact, the claim that Bewitched received criticism during its initial airing is incorrect. My research shows a direct contemporary correlation between the protest to Harry Potter beginning in 1999 and the rejection of Bewitched by Christian fundamentalists based on the issue of witchcraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes and Documents
    NOTES AND DOCUMENTS *An ^American in J^ondony 1735—1736 II EDITED BY BEVERLY MCANEAR Saturdayy July 26} 1735. I rosse Early and wrote till 2, when I dined. My father read the persian letters.84 After dinner one Kerr85 came to wait on my father with letters from Capt. Pearse, with whom He came from Virginia. Captn. Pearse was stoped at Portsmouth] by Adll. Cavindish86 and Had Sent my fathers letters and papers up by Ker. He left New York the 22 of June, and all the family well. We read over our letters and the papers that came with them. I dress'd and went to Capt. Tubly, who was walking on the Bishops Walk. I told Him of the arrivall of Capt. Pearse, with whom Young Grey is, who the Capt. designs for his daughter. I walked with Him till past 7 oClock, when we went to the Club. Comissary Cullif ord being there, we Had some discourse about the Cheapness of arms made at Brum- idgham, where, the Comissary told us, he was offerred Cutlases to all appearance as good as those used in the queens ware at sea for two Shillings a piece and guns for 7 pound a score, but the guns he believed to be good for little. I stayed till Capt. Man and Doctor Smart came, when, taking my lieve, I walked some time with Miss Balcion and, coming Home, went to bed. Sundayy July 27y 1735.1 rosse Early and, Having read in the per- sian letters till 11,1 dress'd, as did my father.
    [Show full text]
  • Placemen's Progress: the Governors of Provincial New York, 1717Т•Fi1753
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 1974 Placemen's Progress: The Governors of Provincial New York, 1717–1753 Neil Ovadia The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/3909 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Paga(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, tney are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame.
    [Show full text]