DOCSLIB.ORG

Briefing Note Template

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Briefing Note Template Appendix C - Summary of Consultation Responses for Park Lane Primary (Junior School) 1.0 Introduction The following documents are included in this Appendix: • A Letter sent by the School to residents • The School Street residents Consultation Response Summary • A petition signed in support of Park Lane Primary School's School Street Application Page 1 of 11 RESTRICTED 2.0 Letter sent by the School to residents Park Lane Primary School School Road Tilehurst Reading. RG31 5BD Junior Department 0118 937 5515 Infant Department 0118 937 5518 E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Executive Head Teacher Mrs Nicola Browne Dear Local Residents, Re: School Streets Closure Order As a school we are in the process of applying for a School Streets closure on the entrance to Downing Road at drop off and pick up times to school and would like to consult you on this application. Despite our best efforts the traffic from parents at these times is proving an increasing risk to the safety of our children. This closure Order is subject to approval from Reading Borough Council. The closures would only take place during term times at the following times: Day AM School Street Time PM School Street Time Monday 8.30am-8.55am 3.15pm- 3.40pm Tuesday 8.30am-8.55am 3.15pm- 3.40pm Wednesday 8.30am-8.55am 3.15pm- 3.40pm Thursday 8.30am-8.55am 3.15pm- 3.40pm Friday 8.30am-8.55am 3.15pm- 3.40pm The road would be fully closed to entering traffic and points of closure would be marshalled. Residents will of course be allowed full access, but are requested to drive at walking speed when within the closure area. It is not necessary to move parked vehicles from the street. School Streets will be under adult supervision and access will be maintained for emergency services at all times in all parts of the street. We will also need to consult with the British Legion on any events taking place that will mean a heavier flow of traffic at the proposed times. Please direct any comments, queries or objections regarding this proposal Ms Brown on [email protected] in the first instance. If she cannot resolve your concern, we will refer it to Reading Borough Council’s School Streets scheme. Thank you and I look forward to working together to make our street safer, Page 2 of 11 RESTRICTED Mrs Nicola Browne and Ms Sarah Tapliss Headteacher Chair Of Governors Response Form – Please return this form to the school office or email responses to Ms Rebecca Brown on [email protected] I support/do not support (please delete as appropriate) the introduction of a school street scheme. Signed ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Name…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Address……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. If you would like to make any comments of support or concern please use the space below; Page 3 of 11 RESTRICTED 3.0 School Street Residents Consultation Response Summary Name of school: Park Lane Primary School- Junior Site Name of street(s): Downing Road/Lambourne Close Name House number/ Support / Summary of Comments business Do Not Support K Hawkins 6 Downing Road Support N/A Dr Natalie 6 Lambourne Support My husband and I would support the Evans decision for the proposed road closure during the times outlined. We have noticed significant delays leaving and returning to our property due to parents collecting and dropping off children. It also seems very unsafe for the children. We have a couple of queries: How will the road be closed e.g. Barrier or warden? We would ideally prefer the latter. Will access be granted to visitors or deliveries to our property? Miss E Smee 8 Downing Road Support Support if residents have access. As long as residents have access, (I will be driving out of the road between 8:30 - 8:55 to get to work) I am happy for this to go along. James 35 Downing Road Support Full Support Endean I fully support proposals as it will make the Road safer for pupils and parents during drop off and collection. Hannah 7 Downing Road Support Full support. Szwarc and Hooray yes will support this definitely Kallum King this road is an absolute nightmare as you can only get one car at a time down the road and when you get 2 cars in opposite directions one has to reverse all the way up/down the road you also have parents/drivers doing 3 point turns at the top and by the school car park With the covid 19 situation you also have parents queuing on both sides of Downing Road so this makes it even more difficult for any pedestrian to walk anywhere up and down the paths and you can't avoid people at any cost and you would take your life in your hands if you walk on the Page 4 of 11 RESTRICTED Name House number/ Support / Summary of Comments business Do Not Support road. If Downing Road was closed this would be so helpful and safe for the children who have to get to school alone and reassuring for their parents not only for Park Lane children but other children from nearby school I have 2 children that walk to and from Denefield school everyday and they get home when Park lane kick out which is a worry for me as I'm collecting my 6 year old daughter from The Laurels (Park Lane) at this time and if the road was closed I know that they would be so much safer as many parents would than use the car parks which is a throw stone away Lewis and 37 Lambourne Support Agree as long as residents have access. Kate Evans Mrs C Weafer 15 Downing Road Support N/A Hazel 2 Downing Road Support Agree as long as residents have access. Bushnell & We support the introduction of a school Adam street scheme at the entrance to Silverson Downing Road provided that residents, their visitors and deliveries will still have full access. I don’t know if you have contacted the residents of Lambourne Close but they will need to be consulted too as they will also still need access. James, Emily, 27 Downing Support We very much support the introduction of Dylan, Beau Road, the scheme and other measures that and Laurie make the street safer and less polluted. Lloyd We would also like to thank you for consulting residents to inform this consent. Just a could couple of comments and questions we would like to offer to be considered. 1. What alternative provision is being provided for parents for example using the car park of the Prince pub 2. With increase in people walking would a better crossing be put in on park Page 5 of 11 RESTRICTED Name House number/ Support / Summary of Comments business Do Not Support lane link a pelican or zebra. 3. Would the council consider putting in a 20mph speed limit through the Centre of Tilehurst to recognize the school and make it still safe to walk and cycle to school. 4. Need to make sure the British legion is also included in the closure order and not exempt as there traffic also often dangerously drives at speed down the street. 5. Have you considered the unintended consequence of people arriving before and after this time. There is already a lot of people sitting there with engine running and waiting. Causing not only increased congestion but pollution as well. Would you consider extending this order to 8.15 to 9.10? J Hennell 21 Downing Road Support Very Good - a long awaited idea to put together. Will this include British Legion club ? that seem to “empty out “ at school run time and use resident spaces at all times. Michele 22 Downing Road Support Firstly, I'd like to assure you I am in Drisse favour of your application - this Victorian terraced street is not designed for the volume of traffic at these times and the speed of traffic and frequency in which drivers use the turning circle as a car park is unacceptable. Might I enquire as to where your staff and visitors park their vehicles? Parking is at a premium in this street and there is rarely a spare space. I trust, unless they are residents themselves, they do not park in Downing Road. A couple of points I'd like to clarify: 1) The road would be fully closed to entering traffic a) Delivery/tradesmen start times are often non-negotiable - how will you approach these events? Page 6 of 11 RESTRICTED Name House number/ Support / Summary of Comments business Do Not Support b) My elderly mother has dementia and lives with me; carers, friends and family sometimes come and go throughout the day for her safety, and some of my elderly neighbours utilise taxi transport - how will you approach these events? 2) Residents will of course be allowed full access a) Please confirm you refer to entry and exit of the road without discrimination b) I AM NOT IN FAVOUR OF A PARKING PERMIT ZONE (I refer you to point 1b). How will your marshalls confirm residency? Have you considered the delay in the traffic at a potentially busy junction and the health and safety risk to the marshalls? I await your response but wish you well with your application. Kevin Payne 25 Lambourne Support N/A Close Jane and 23 Lambourne Support N/A Keith Watts C E Weafer 15 Downing Road Support N/A Lisa White 5 Downing Road Support N/A Page 7 of 11 RESTRICTED 4.0 Support petition for Park Lane Primary School's School Street Application Friends of Park Lane Primary School Association Support Park Lane Primary School's School Street Application Petition Signatures from 02/10 /2020 – 12/10/2020 Name Location Date Lindsay Braine Reading, England, UK 2020-10-02 Jenna Swanborough Reading, England, UK 2020-10-02 Helen Walsh Reading, England,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ACE Committee 6 June 2017 All Papers
    Alison Bell Acting Chief Executive Civic Offices, Bridge Street, Reading, RG1 2LU 0118 937 3787 To: Councillor McElligott (Chair); Councillors Eden, Gavin, Hoskin, Jones, Khan, Maskell, McKenna, O’Connell, Our Ref: ace/agenda Pearce, Robinson, Stanford-Beale, Vickers Your Ref: and J Williams. Direct: 0118 937 2332 e-mail:[email protected] 26 May 2017 Your contact is: Richard Woodford – Committee Services NOTICE OF MEETING – ADULT SOCIAL CARE, CHILDREN’S SERVICES AND EDUCATION COMMITTEE – 6 JUNE 2017 A meeting of the Adult Social Care, Children’s Services and Education Committee will be held on Tuesday 6 June 2017 at 6.30pm in the Council Chamber, Civic Offices, Reading. AGENDA WARDS PAGE NO AFFECTED 1. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST Councillors to declare any disclosable pecuniary interests they may have in relation to the items for consideration. 2. MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE ADULT SOCIAL CARE, 1 CHILDREN’S SERVICES AND EDUCATION COMMITTEE HELD ON 20 MARCH 2017 3. MINUTES OF OTHER BODIES – Children’s Trust Partnership Board – 5 April 2017 12 4. PETITIONS Petitions submitted pursuant to Standing Order 36 in - relation to matters falling within the Committee’s Powers & Duties which have been received by Head of Legal & Democratic Services no later than four clear working days before the meeting. CIVIC OFFICES EMERGENCY EVACUATION: If an alarm sounds, leave by the nearest fire exit quickly and calmly and assemble on the corner of Bridge Street and Fobney Street. You will be advised when it is safe to re-enter the building. www.reading.gov.uk | facebook.com/ReadingCouncil | twitter.com/ReadingCouncil 5.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Portsmouth MEMBERS' INFORMATION SERVICE Part 1
    City of Portsmouth MEMBERS' INFORMATION SERVICE NO 48 DATE: FRIDAY 4 DECEMBER 2015 The Members' Information Service produced in the Community & Communication Directorate has been prepared in three parts - Part 1 - Decisions by the Cabinet and individual Cabinet Members, subject to Councillors' right to have the matter called in for scrutiny. Part 2 - Proposals from Managers which they would like to implement subject to Councillors' right to have the matter referred to the relevant Cabinet Member or Regulatory Committee; and Part 3 - Items of general information and news. Part 1 - Decisions by the Cabinet The following decisions have been taken by the Cabinet (or individual Cabinet Members), and will be implemented unless the call-in procedure is activated. Rule 15 of the Policy and Review Panels Procedure Rules requires a call-in notice to be signed by any 5 members of the Council. The call-in request must be made to [email protected] and must be received by not later than 5 pm on the date shown in the item. If you want to know more about a proposal, please contact the officer indicated. You can also see the report on the Council's web site at www.portsmouth.gov.uk 1 DATE: FRIDAY 4 DECEMBER 2015 WARD DECISION OFFICER CONTACT 1 Cabinet Member for Traffic & Transportation Decision Meeting - 26 November Joanne Wildsmith Local Democracy Councillor Ellcome as the Cabinet Member has made the following decisions:- Officer Tel: 9283 4057 Eastney & Ferry Road update (Information Item) Pam Turton Craneswater Assistant Head of DECISIONS: Transport & Environment The information report was an update on the previously proposed Traffic Regulation Order (TRO Tel: 9283 4614 36/2015) which has since been withdrawn.
    [Show full text]
  • List of 100 Priority Places
    Priority Places Place Lead Authority Argyll and Bute Argyll and Bute Council Barnsley Sheffield City Region Combined Authority Barrow-in-Furness Cumbria County Council Bassetlaw Nottinghamshire County Council Birmingham West Midlands Combined Authority Blackburn with Darwen Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council Blackpool Blackpool Council Blaenau Gwent Blaenau Gwent Council Bolton Greater Manchester Combined Authority Boston Lincolnshire County Council Bradford West Yorkshire Combined Authority Burnley Lancashire County Council Calderdale West Yorkshire Combined Authority Canterbury Kent County Council Carmarthenshire Carmarthenshire Council Ceredigion Ceredigion Council Conwy Conwy County Borough Council Corby Northamptonshire County Council* Cornwall Cornwall Council County Durham Durham County Council Darlington Tees Valley Combined Authority Denbighshire Denbighshire County Council Derbyshire Dales Derbyshire County Council Doncaster Sheffield City Region Combined Authority Dudley West Midlands Combined Authority Dumfries and Galloway Dumfries and Galloway Council East Ayrshire East Ayrshire Council East Lindsey Lincolnshire County Council East Northamptonshire Northamptonshire County Council* Falkirk Falkirk Council Fenland Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority Gateshead Gateshead Council Glasgow City Glasgow City Council Gravesham Kent County Council Great Yarmouth Norfolk County Council Gwynedd Gwynedd Council Harlow Essex County Council Hartlepool Tees Valley Combined Authority Hastings East Sussex County Council
    [Show full text]
  • Local Authority / Combined Authority / STB Members (July 2021)
    Local Authority / Combined Authority / STB members (July 2021) 1. Barnet (London Borough) 24. Durham County Council 50. E Northants Council 73. Sunderland City Council 2. Bath & NE Somerset Council 25. East Riding of Yorkshire 51. N. Northants Council 74. Surrey County Council 3. Bedford Borough Council Council 52. Northumberland County 75. Swindon Borough Council 4. Birmingham City Council 26. East Sussex County Council Council 76. Telford & Wrekin Council 5. Bolton Council 27. Essex County Council 53. Nottinghamshire County 77. Torbay Council 6. Bournemouth Christchurch & 28. Gloucestershire County Council 78. Wakefield Metropolitan Poole Council Council 54. Oxfordshire County Council District Council 7. Bracknell Forest Council 29. Hampshire County Council 55. Peterborough City Council 79. Walsall Council 8. Brighton & Hove City Council 30. Herefordshire Council 56. Plymouth City Council 80. Warrington Borough Council 9. Buckinghamshire Council 31. Hertfordshire County Council 57. Portsmouth City Council 81. Warwickshire County Council 10. Cambridgeshire County 32. Hull City Council 58. Reading Borough Council 82. West Berkshire Council Council 33. Isle of Man 59. Rochdale Borough Council 83. West Sussex County Council 11. Central Bedfordshire Council 34. Kent County Council 60. Rutland County Council 84. Wigan Council 12. Cheshire East Council 35. Kirklees Council 61. Salford City Council 85. Wiltshire Council 13. Cheshire West & Chester 36. Lancashire County Council 62. Sandwell Borough Council 86. Wokingham Borough Council Council 37. Leeds City Council 63. Sheffield City Council 14. City of Wolverhampton 38. Leicestershire County Council 64. Shropshire Council Combined Authorities Council 39. Lincolnshire County Council 65. Slough Borough Council • West of England Combined 15. City of York Council 40.
    [Show full text]
  • Q2 1617 LA Referrals
    Referrals to Local Authority Adoption Agencies from First4Adoption by region Q2 July-September 2016 Yorkshire & The Humber LA Adoption Agencies North East LA Adoption Agencies Durham County Council 13 North Yorkshire County Council* 30 1 Northumberland County Council 8 Barnsley Adoption Fostering Unit 11 South Tyneside Council 8 Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council 11 2 North Tyneside Council 5 Bradford Metropolitan Borough Council 10 Redcar Cleveland Borough Council 5 Hull City Council 10 1 Web Referrals Phone Referrals Middlesbrough Council 3 East Riding Of Yorkshire Council 9 City Of Sunderland 2 Cumbria County Council 7 Gateshead Council 2 Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council 6 1 Newcastle Upon Tyne City Council 2 0 3.5 7 10.5 14 Leeds City Council 6 1 Web Referrals Phone Referrals Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council 5 Hartlepool Borough Council 4 North Lincolnshire Adoption Service 4 1 City Of York Council 3 North East Lincolnshire Adoption Service 3 1 Darlington Borough Council 2 Kirklees Metropolitan Council 2 1 Sheffield Metropolitan City Council 2 Wakefield Metropolitan District Council 2 * Denotes agencies with more than one office entry on the agency finder 0 10 20 30 40 North West LA Adoption Agencies Liverpool City Council 30 Cheshire West And Chester County Council 16 Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council 11 1 Manchester City Council 9 WWISH 9 Lancashire County Council 8 Oldham Council 8 1 Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council 8 2 Web Referrals Phone Referrals Wirral Adoption Team 8 Salford City Council 7 3 Bury Metropolitan
    [Show full text]
  • Parking Services Annual Report 2018/2019
    PARKING SERVICES ANNUAL REPORT 2018/2019 Foreword – Councillor Page Welcome to Reading Borough Council’s eleventh Parking Services Annual Report. The report summarises the parking and traffic enforcement responsibilities conducted by the Council in 2018/2019. It also provides details of activities and related financial information. Reading remains a key economic hub in the Thames Valley and wider South-East. Many thousands of people travel into and around Reading on a daily basis, placing great demands on our transport infrastructure. At the same time, local businesses highlight a lack of capacity in transport infrastructure as one of their key concerns, and a restraint to future growth. The increasing demands on infrastructure are seen either through overcrowding or traffic congestion levels. New infrastructure and growing our public transport offer, not only provide significant improvements to sustainable transport options, they support growth in the local economy and reducing Reading’s carbon footprint. The Council introduced its first red route in Reading, along the ‘Purple 17’ bus route in March 2018 to help ease congestion and improve public transport. Reading has an enforcement policy to try and balance the needs of all road users, at a time when demands continue to increase. The key objective is to maintain an appropriate balance between the needs of residents, visitors, businesses and access for disabled people, thereby contributing to the economic growth and success of the town. Enforcement is conducted both on and off-street by Council Parking Services and Civil Enforcement Officers, employed through a term contractor. These officers actively patrol and enforce parking restrictions, supporting traffic management and safety responsibilities imposed on local authorities by legislation, directing patrol efforts to strategically important routes, areas of high contravention and sensitive locations, and in many cases in response to public demand.
    [Show full text]
  • UASC Capacity Support - Proposed Distribution of £21.3M Allocation Is Based on Latest Available Home Office Management Data Capturing Numbers at September
    UASC capacity support - proposed distribution of £21.3m Allocation is based on latest available Home Office management data capturing numbers at September. The information on NTS transfers has been confirmed by the Strategic Migration Partnership leads and is accurate up to December 2017. Please see attached FAQ and methodology document for further information. Local Authority Amount Total 21,258,203.00 London Borough of Barking and Dagenham £ 141,094.00 London Borough of Barnet £ 282,189.00 Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council £ 94,063.00 Bath and North East Somerset Council £ 94,063.00 Bedford Council (Unitary) £ 94,063.00 London Borough of Bexley £ 282,189.00 Birmingham City Council £ 188,126.00 Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council £ 94,063.00 Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council £ 94,063.00 Bournemouth Borough Council £ 141,094.00 Bracknell Forest Council £ 94,063.00 Bradford Metropolitan District Council £ 94,063.00 London Borough of Brent £ 329,219.00 Brighton and Hove City Council £ 188,126.00 Bristol City Council £ 188,126.00 London Borough of Bromley £ 141,094.00 Buckinghamshire County Council £ 188,126.00 Bury Metropolitan Borough Council £ 94,063.00 Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council £ 94,063.00 Cambridgeshire County Council £ 235,157.00 London Borough of Camden £ 329,219.00 Central Bedfordshire Council £ 282,189.00 Cheshire East Council (Unitary) £ 94,063.00 Cheshire West and Chester Council £ 94,063.00 City of London £ 94,063.00 City of Nottingham Council £ 94,063.00 Cornwall Council (Unitary) £ 94,063.00 Coventry City
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL
    Appendix D West Berkshire Council Senior Management Review STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL Prepared for: Nick Carter Chief Executive West Berkshire Council Market Street Newbury RG14 5LD Prepared by: Jennifer McNeill Chartered Fellow CIPD; MA; BEd The Guildhall, High Street Regional Director Winchester, Hampshire, SO23 9GH South East Employers Telephone: 01962 840664 1 e-mail: [email protected] Website: www.seemp.co.uk 29 October 2018 (revised) 2 1. Context and purpose of review 1.1 West Berkshire Council (WBC) is aware that, given the higher age profile of senior managers (many are approaching 60 years of age), a number may retire soon (likely within 2-5 years). Therefore, as part of its workforce and succession planning process, the council seeks to commence early discussions about the current structure and the potential for realignment to meet future service demands and challenges, including scarcer resources and increasing competition in certain areas. 1.2 Workforce planning provides the means to review and redefine the senior manager structure to meet emerging demands and challenges in the medium to longer term. Early consideration can be given to the future shape and structure of the senior management team to meet changing service demands prior to vacancies starting to appear. 1.3 The development of a ‘blue-print’ to take the structure forward will inform decision- making for either a planned process of revising the structure, or to manage vacancies individually as they start to arise. 1.4 The council needs to be able to respond to any skills shortage areas or particular recruitment or retention difficulties. Is the council positioned to attract high level, or difficult to recruit to, skills to fill senior level vacancies when they arise in the short and medium term? 1.5 A planned approach will minimise disruption to service provision in those areas if the situation arises.
    [Show full text]
  • Representations Made on Pre-Submission Draft Local Plan and Proposals Map
    REPRESENTATIONS MADE ON PRE-SUBMISSION DRAFT LOCAL PLAN AND PROPOSALS MAP This document contains full copies of the representations made on the Pre- Submission Draft Local Plan and Proposals Map and other supporting documents, as part of the consultation held between 30th November 2017 and 26th January 2018. The representations are shown in this document in alphabetical order. Please use the contents page to navigate, and please note also that page numbers are generally visible on the title page for each representation. For summaries of the representations, set out in document order, please see the Statement of Consultation on the Pre-Submission Local Plan. 1 CONTENTS ALLCOCK, PAUL 5 EBERST, ALAN 207 ANSELL, JULIAN 7 EDEN-JONES, SARAH 210 APPLETON, PATRICIA 14 ELLIS, LIZ 213 ARTHUR HILL – SAVE OUR SWIMMING C.I.C 16 EMMER GREEN RESIDENTS’ ASSOCIATION 219 ASQUITH, DR PETER 19 ENGLEFIELD ESTATE 223 AVIVA LIFE AND PENSIONS 21 ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 229 AYRES, ANNE 27 EVANS, GARY 259 AYRES, ROBERT 29 EVERITT, NICHOLAS 266 B.B.C. 31 FAREY, JULIA AND STEVE 268 BEDFORD, CHRIS 46 F.C.C. ENVIRONMENT 270 BEE, KEVIN 49 FESTIVAL REPUBLIC 274 BELL TOWER COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION 53 FRASER-HARDING, KATHLEEN 288 BERKSHIRE, BUCKINGHAMSHIRE AND OXFORDSHIRE WILDLIFE TRUST 56 FRASER-HARDING, TIM 290 BERKSHIRE GARDENS TRUST 64 GILLOTTS SCHOOL 292 BICKERSTAFFE, JANE 78 GLADMAN DEVELOPMENTS LTD 297 BINGLEY, PATRICK 82 GRASHOFF, ANDREA 326 BISHOP, ROB 84 GRASHOFF, GREGORY 329 BLADES, VICTORIA 89 GREATER LONDON AUTHORITY 335 BOOKER GROUP PLC 92 GREYFRIARS CHURCH 341
    [Show full text]
  • Reading Borough Local Plan
    READING BOROUGH LOCAL PLAN Adopted November 2019 DRAFTDRD AFAFT READINGRREADINNG BOROUGHBOBOROR UGH LOCALLOOCAAL PLPLANLANAN ● APRILAAPRRIL 202017117 4. GENERAL POLICIES—HOUSING 4.4 Housing Provision of Housing H1: PROVISION OF HOUSING Provision will be made for at least an additional 15,847 homes (averaging 689 homes per annum) in Reading Borough for the period 2013 to 2036. The Council will continue to work with neighbouring authorities within the Western Berkshire Housing Market Area to ensure that the shortfall of 230 dwellings that cannot be provided within Reading will be met over the plan period. 4.4.1 There is a pressing need for additional housing in Reading and the surrounding area. The six Berkshire authorities (Reading Borough Council, Bracknell Forest Borough Council, Slough Borough Council, West Berkshire District Council, the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead and Wokingham Borough Council) together with the Thames Valley Berkshire Local Enterprise Partnership co-operated on the production of a Berkshire (with South Bucks) Strategic Housing Market Assessment, which reported in February 201672. This study identified the Housing Market Areas within which the Berkshire authorities should work, and set out levels of housing need between 2013 and 2036. 4.4.2 The SHMA identifies Reading as being part of a Western Berkshire Housing Market Area, together with West Berkshire, Wokingham and Bracknell Forest. Within this area, an ‘objectively assessed need’ is identified for a total of 2,855 new homes every year up to 2036. Reading’s share of this need is 699 homes per year, or a total of 16,077 between 2013 and 2036.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading Borough Council Corporate Plan 2021/22 Foreword from Cllr Jason Brock Leader of Reading Borough Council
    Investing in Reading’s Future Reading Borough Council Corporate Plan 2021/22 Foreword from Cllr Jason Brock Leader of Reading Borough Council As we start this new financial year, we face a social and environmental goals from our last situation of unprecedented uncertainty. The corporate plan. We remain aspirational for the Covid-19 pandemic has brought incredible future of Reading, and our vision is that the challenges for our town, our communities and environment, the economy and the community our economy. The crisis has kept us at home, are together at the heart of a more inclusive, prevented children from going to school, closed more equitable town. We want everyone to be businesses and harmed the mental and physical treated fairly; to have equal access to green health of thousands of people. And as with space, clean air, skills, services, jobs and any crisis, the most vulnerable have been the housing; and to benefit from Reading’s success. hardest hit. We don’t yet know how quickly we Over the coming year, we will also look ahead will bring the pandemic under control, how fast to our next three-year strategic plan. It will the economy will recover and the extent to which be a challenge. Covid-19 will be with us for a people will face long term harm as a result. But long time yet. We are committed to working what we are certain about, is that Reading can with our partners across the town - including and will recover. businesses and employers, major institutions Throughout the pandemic, and in the wake of such as Reading University and the Royal the tragic attacks in Forbury Gardens last June, Berkshire Hospital, the voluntary sector and our communities, our people, and our town our residents - to lead Reading’s recovery, to have shown they are resilient, innovative and bring our vision to life and to create a better compassionate.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading Borough Council Report by Director Of
    READING BOROUGH COUNCIL REPORT BY DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENT & NEIGHBOURHOOD SERVICES TO: POLICY COMMITTEE DATE: 16 JULY 2018 AGENDA ITEM: 12 TITLE: NEW LOCAL TRANSPORT PLAN AND BOROUGH-WIDE CAR PARKING & AIR QUALITY STRATEGY LEAD TONY PAGE PORTFOLIO: STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENT, COUNCILLOR: PLANNING & TRANSPORT SERVICE: TRANSPORTATION & WARDS: BOROUGHWIDE STREETCARE LEAD OFFICERS: EMMA BAKER/JAMES TEL: 0118 937 2068 TURNER JOB TITLES: ACTING TRANSPORT E-MAIL: [email protected] PLANNING MANAGER [email protected] / TRANSPORT PLANNER 1. PURPOSE OF REPORT AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 This report provides an update on the preparation of a new Local Transport Plan (LTP4) for Reading that seeks to identify new goals and objectives, reflect on progress made in delivering LTP3 and ensure transport policy is aligned with the new Local Plan. The LTP4 development programme is set out in Appendix A. 1.2 The report also seeks approval to develop a new borough-wide car parking and air quality strategy to help address concerns about congestion and poor air quality. As part of this strategy it is proposed that demand management measures, such as Road User Charging, Workplace Parking Levy, Clean Air Zone or Low Emission Zone are investigated. A number of case studies on such demand management schemes are set out in Appendix B, including Nottingham where they successfully introduced a Workplace Parking Levy in 2012. In addition, the Appendix sets out more recent examples of Local Authorities who are currently investigating similar charging schemes, including Oxfordshire, Southampton and Brighton. 1.3 The demand management measures have the potential to generate income that is ring- fenced to transport and highway schemes and could be used to fast-track the delivery of the 15-year LTP4 investment programme, including complementary sustainable transport measures as set out in this report.
    [Show full text]