DOCSLIB.ORG

PLAIN of ANTIOCH III Oi.Uchicago.Edu

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

oi.uchicago.edu EXCAVATIONS IN THE PLAIN OF ANTIOCH III oi.uchicago.edu Back cover: View of Chatal Höyük from the northeast. Photo taken by Claude Prost, probably in the summer of 1932 oi.uchicago.edu iii EXCAVATIONS IN THE PLAIN OF ANTIOCH III STRATIGRAPHY, POTTERY, AND SMALL FINDS FROM CHATAL HÖYÜK IN THE AMUQ PLAIN MARINA PUCCI with appendices from J. A. BRINKMAN, E. GÖTTING, and G. HÖLBL THIS RESEARCH WAS CARRIED OUT THANKS TO THE FINANCIAL SUPPORT OF THE SHELBY WHITE-LEON LEVY FOUNDATION PART 1 | TEXT O R I E N TA L INSTITUTE PUBLICATIONS • VOLUME 143 THE O R I E N TA L INSTITUTE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO oi.uchicago.edu iv LCCN: 2019930795 ISBN-13: 978-1-61491-046-6 ISSN: 0069-3367 The Oriental Institute, Chicago ©2019 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. Published 2019. Printed in the United States of America. Oriental Institute Publications 143 Series Editors Charissa Johnson and Thomas G. Urban with the assistance of Rebecca Cain, Alexandra Cornacchia, Jaslyn Ramos, Emily Smith, and Steven Townshend Cover Illustration Painted potstand, Iron Age I (A26946, cat. no. 134). Illustration by Angela Altenhofen, coloring by Tiziana d’Este. Spine Illustration Scene incised on ostracon (A17370, cat. no. 1110). Illustration by Angela Altenhofen. Printed by Marquis Book Printing in Montmagny, Québec Canada through Four Colour Print Group. This paper meets the requirements of ansi/niso Z39.48-1992 (Permanence of Paper) oi.uchicago.edu v Table of Contents List of Tables .............................................................................. xiii List of Figures ..............................................................................xv Preface (James F. Osborne) .................................................................... xix Acknowledgments .......................................................................... xxi Bibliography .............................................................................xxiii CHAPTER 1. History of the Excavations, Research, and Materials. .1 The Archaeological Investigations at Chatal Höyük and in the Amuq: A Brief History ............1 Excavation Routine and Documentation System ...........................................3 The Excavation System...........................................................3 The Daily Routine at the Excavation House..........................................4 History of Research ....................................................................5 The Reports and the Amuq Research ...............................................5 The Amuq Cultural Phases........................................................6 Materials from Chatal Höyük in the Current Research of the Late Bronze Age/Iron Age Periods ..............................................8 Aims and Structure of the Publication ....................................................9 CHAPTER 2. Methods of Reanalysis ............................................................13 Materials and Documents at Our Disposal ................................................13 The Written Documentation .....................................................13 The Small Finds ................................................................13 The Pottery ...................................................................14 Data Processing and Cataloging. 14 The Stratigraphy ...............................................................14 Pottery Analysis ...............................................................16 Fabrics ..................................................................17 Shapes ..................................................................17 Surface Treatments........................................................17 Decoration ...............................................................18 Pottery Selection and Classes ....................................................18 Small Finds....................................................................20 Classification for Relative Chronology and Archaeological Sequence. 21 Functional Classification for Understanding Cultural Features ..............................22 The Functional Categories .......................................................22 CHAPTER 3. Area I: Stratigraphy and Related Materials ...........................................29 Phase N, Level I_10 ...................................................................30 Phase N, Level I_09 ...................................................................31 Locus V-13_09 .................................................................32 Locus W-15_IIIe ................................................................32 Phase N, Level I_08 ...................................................................33 Loci V-13_08, V-13_08_Floor .....................................................33 Locus W-15_IIId ................................................................36 Phase N_Final, Level I_07 ..............................................................37 v oi.uchicago.edu vi Table of Contents Locus V-13_07 .................................................................37 Phase O_Beg, Level I_06 ...............................................................39 Northwestern Area: Locus W-12_IIIc ..............................................40 Central Area: Locus V-13_06 (Including V-12).......................................40 Eastern Area: Loci W-15_IIIc+, W-15_IIIc_Tr, V-15_IIIc................................42 Town Wall Trench, Locus W-13_Tr ................................................42 Phase O, Level I_05 ...................................................................43 The Pottery from Loci W/V/U-12/13/14/15_IIIc ....................................43 Caches V-13/7, V-13/6 . 48 Phase O, Level I_04 ...................................................................49 Loci W/V/U-12/13/14/15_IIIb/_III_Low ...........................................49 The In Situ Assemblages: The Central Units (Caches V-13/4, V-13/2)...................52 Assemblages in Caches V-13/3, V-13/5 ............................................53 The In Situ Assemblages: The Northwestern Units (Caches W-13/2, W-13/3) ............54 Phase O, Level I_03 ...................................................................55 Loci W/V/U-13/14/15_IIIa/_III/_III_High ..........................................55 The Caches in the Level (W-15/2, W-13/1, W-14/1, V-14/1, V-15/1, V-15/2).............56 Phase O-Q, Level I_02 .................................................................58 Loci U-13_II, W-13_II, W-14_II ....................................................59 Locus V-13_II . 60 Phase Q-T, Levels I_01, I_00 ............................................................60 The Town Wall in Area I ...............................................................61 CHAPTER 4. Area II: Stratigraphy and Related Materials ..........................................63 Phase M, Level II_13 (No Loci) ..........................................................63 Phase M, Level II_12 ..................................................................64 Loci N-13_10, N-14_II ...........................................................65 Locus N-13_IIe .................................................................68 Phase M, Level II_11 ..................................................................70 Pottery of Locus N-13_IId_Floor ..................................................71 Pottery of Loci N-13_IId, N-13_IId_Pit .............................................73 Graves ........................................................................74 Phase M-N, Level II_10_Floor, II_10_Fill ..................................................75 Locus N-13_IIc_Floor (Phase M)...................................................75 Loci N-13_IIc_Pit, N-13_IIc (Phase N) ..............................................77 Graves ........................................................................81 Phase N_Beg, Level II_09 ...............................................................82 Pottery of Locus N-13_IIb........................................................82 Phase N, Level II_08 ...................................................................85 Loci N-13_II, N-13_III, N-13_Ib ....................................................86 Phase N, Level II_07 ...................................................................89 Locus N-13_Id..................................................................89 Locus N-13_III .................................................................90 Phase N-O, Level II_06 .................................................................91 Locus N-13_Ic..................................................................91 Cache N-13/1 ..................................................................92 Phase O, Level II_05 ...................................................................93 Loci M-13_IIIb, M-13_III, P-13_03 .................................................93 Phase O, Level II_04 ...................................................................95 oi.uchicago.edu Table of Contents vii Loci P-13_02, P-12_02 ...........................................................96 Loci N-12_03, N-12_02c, N-13_01a .................................................98 Phase O, Level II_03 ...................................................................99 Loci M-12_03, N-12_02, M-13_Ia, P-13_Ia–b . .99 Loci M-12_02, M-12_03, N-12_02, N-12_03 .........................................101 Cache M-13/1.................................................................103
Recommended publications
  • Seven Churches of Revelation Turkey

    Seven Churches of Revelation Turkey

    TRAVEL GUIDE SEVEN CHURCHES OF REVELATION TURKEY TURKEY Pergamum Lesbos Thyatira Sardis Izmir Chios Smyrna Philadelphia Samos Ephesus Laodicea Aegean Sea Patmos ASIA Kos 1 Rhodes ARCHEOLOGICAL MAP OF WESTERN TURKEY BULGARIA Sinanköy Manya Mt. NORTH EDİRNE KIRKLARELİ Selimiye Fatih Iron Foundry Mosque UNESCO B L A C K S E A MACEDONIA Yeni Saray Kırklareli Höyük İSTANBUL Herakleia Skotoussa (Byzantium) Krenides Linos (Constantinople) Sirra Philippi Beikos Palatianon Berge Karaevlialtı Menekşe Çatağı Prusias Tauriana Filippoi THRACE Bathonea Küçükyalı Ad hypium Morylos Dikaia Heraion teikhos Achaeology Edessa Neapolis park KOCAELİ Tragilos Antisara Abdera Perinthos Basilica UNESCO Maroneia TEKİRDAĞ (İZMİT) DÜZCE Europos Kavala Doriskos Nicomedia Pella Amphipolis Stryme Işıklar Mt. ALBANIA Allante Lete Bormiskos Thessalonica Argilos THE SEA OF MARMARA SAKARYA MACEDONIANaoussa Apollonia Thassos Ainos (ADAPAZARI) UNESCO Thermes Aegae YALOVA Ceramic Furnaces Selectum Chalastra Strepsa Berea Iznik Lake Nicea Methone Cyzicus Vergina Petralona Samothrace Parion Roman theater Acanthos Zeytinli Ada Apamela Aisa Ouranopolis Hisardere Dasaki Elimia Pydna Barçın Höyük BTHYNIA Galepsos Yenibademli Höyük BURSA UNESCO Antigonia Thyssus Apollonia (Prusa) ÇANAKKALE Manyas Zeytinlik Höyük Arisbe Lake Ulubat Phylace Dion Akrothooi Lake Sane Parthenopolis GÖKCEADA Aktopraklık O.Gazi Külliyesi BİLECİK Asprokampos Kremaste Daskyleion UNESCO Höyük Pythion Neopolis Astyra Sundiken Mts. Herakleum Paşalar Sarhöyük Mount Athos Achmilleion Troy Pessinus Potamia Mt.Olympos
  • The Satrap of Western Anatolia and the Greeks

    The Satrap of Western Anatolia and the Greeks

    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Eyal Meyer University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons Recommended Citation Meyer, Eyal, "The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2473. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Abstract This dissertation explores the extent to which Persian policies in the western satrapies originated from the provincial capitals in the Anatolian periphery rather than from the royal centers in the Persian heartland in the fifth ec ntury BC. I begin by establishing that the Persian administrative apparatus was a product of a grand reform initiated by Darius I, which was aimed at producing a more uniform and centralized administrative infrastructure. In the following chapter I show that the provincial administration was embedded with chancellors, scribes, secretaries and military personnel of royal status and that the satrapies were periodically inspected by the Persian King or his loyal agents, which allowed to central authorities to monitory the provinces. In chapter three I delineate the extent of satrapal authority, responsibility and resources, and conclude that the satraps were supplied with considerable resources which enabled to fulfill the duties of their office. After the power dynamic between the Great Persian King and his provincial governors and the nature of the office of satrap has been analyzed, I begin a diachronic scrutiny of Greco-Persian interactions in the fifth century BC.
  • Pyla-Koutsopetria I Archaeological Survey of an Ancient Coastal Town American Schools of Oriental Research Archeological Reports

    Pyla-Koutsopetria I Archaeological Survey of an Ancient Coastal Town American Schools of Oriental Research Archeological Reports

    PYLA-KOUTSOPETRIA I ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF AN ANCIENT COASTAL TOWN AMERICAN SCHOOLS OF ORIENTAL RESEARCH ARCHEOLOGICAL REPORTS Kevin M. McGeough, Editor Number 21 Pyla-Koutsopetria I: Archaeological Survey of an Ancient Coastal Town PYLA-KOUTSOPETRIA I ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF AN ANCIENT COASTAL TOWN By William Caraher, R. Scott Moore, and David K. Pettegrew with contributions by Maria Andrioti, P. Nick Kardulias, Dimitri Nakassis, and Brandon R. Olson AMERICAN SCHOOLS OF ORIENTAL RESEARCH • BOSTON, MA Pyla-Koutsopetria I: Archaeological Survey of an Ancient Coastal Town by William Caraher, R. Scott Moore, and David K. Pettegrew Te American Schools of Oriental Research © 2014 ISBN 978-0-89757-069-5 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Caraher, William R. (William Rodney), 1972- Pyla-Koutsopetria I : archaeological survey of an ancient coastal town / by William Caraher, R. Scott Moore, and David K. Pettegrew ; with contributions by Maria Andrioti, P. Nick Kardulias, Dimitri Nakassis, and Brandon Olson. pages cm. -- (Archaeological reports ; volume 21) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-89757-069-5 (alkaline paper) 1. Pyla-Kokkinokremos Site (Cyprus) 2. Archaeological surveying--Cyprus. 3. Excavations (Archaeology)--Cyprus. 4. Bronze age--Cyprus. 5. Cyprus--Antiquities. I. Moore, R. Scott (Robert Scott), 1965- II. Pettegrew, David K. III. Title. DS54.95.P94C37 2014 939’.37--dc23 2014034947 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper. For Our Parents, Fred and Nancy Caraher Bob and Joyce Moore Hal and Sharon Pettegrew Introduction to A Provisional Linked Digital Version of Pyla-Koutsopetria I: Archaeological Survey of an Ancient Coastal Town We are very pleased to release a digital version of Pyla-Koutsopetria I: Archaeological Survey of an Ancient Coastal Town (2014).
  • Tayinat's Building XVI: the Religious Dimensions and Significance of A

    Tayinat's Building XVI: the Religious Dimensions and Significance of A

    Tayinat’s Building XVI: The Religious Dimensions and Significance of a Tripartite Temple at Neo-Assyrian Kunulua by Douglas Neal Petrovich A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Near and Middle Eastern Civilizations University of Toronto © Copyright by Douglas Neal Petrovich, 2016 Building XVI at Tell Tayinat: The Religious Dimensions and Significance of a Tripartite Temple at Neo-Assyrian Kunulua Douglas N. Petrovich Doctor of Philosophy Department of Near and Middle Eastern Civilizations University of Toronto 2016 Abstract After the collapse of the Hittite Empire and most of the power structures in the Levant at the end of the Late Bronze Age, new kingdoms and powerful city-states arose to fill the vacuum over the course of the Iron Age. One new player that surfaced on the regional scene was the Kingdom of Palistin, which was centered at Kunulua, the ancient capital that has been identified positively with the site of Tell Tayinat in the Amuq Valley. The archaeological and epigraphical evidence that has surfaced in recent years has revealed that Palistin was a formidable kingdom, with numerous cities and territories having been enveloped within its orb. Kunulua and its kingdom eventually fell prey to the Neo-Assyrian Empire, which decimated the capital in 738 BC under Tiglath-pileser III. After Kunulua was rebuilt under Neo- Assyrian control, the city served as a provincial capital under Neo-Assyrian administration. Excavations of the 1930s uncovered a palatial district atop the tell, including a temple (Building II) that was adjacent to the main bit hilani palace of the king (Building I).
  • East Mediterranean 4” (Camp Nr 07 / District 2430) 21 June-8 July 2015

    East Mediterranean 4” (Camp Nr 07 / District 2430) 21 June-8 July 2015

    Invitation to the International Summer Camp “East Mediterranean 4” (Camp Nr 07 / District 2430) 21 June-8 July 2015 Host Country / Club(s) : Gaziantep Kavaklik, Antakya Defne & Tarsus RCs Theme of the camp : “ Explore the beauties of East Mediterranea ” Program : See following pages Participants : 12 ( 9 Girls & 3 Boys ) ( One Per Country ) Age : 14–18 Language : English Accommodation : Families Cost : Only Flight tickets to arrival point and Back, Insurance & Pocket Money Arrival : Gaziantep Airport Departure : Adana Şakirpaşa Airport Insurance : Participants must be insured against illness, accident and third party damages according to Rotary International Requirements All Applications&Register.: (Before 01 May 2015) : Abdullah Kuregibuyuk Mutlukent Mah.1920 Cad. Makis Gul Sit.No.29 Umitkoy 06800 Ankara Turkey Tel : + 90 312 417 59 40 Fax : + 90 312 235 70 24 GSM : + 90 533 217 50 94 E-mail : [email protected] East Mediterrainan Summer Camp 2015 PART 1 Kavaklık Rotary Club’s Programme 21 June Sunday Arrival at Gaziantep, getting from airport and free time with families 22 June Monday 09.00 –11.00 Meeting at Tenis club, and City Tour, 11.00-12-00 Visit to Sanko High Scholl 13.00 -14.00 Lunch at Sanko High Scholl. 13.30-17.00 Visit to City museum at Bayazhan Shopping in Old Historical Bazaar Visit to Gaziantep castle 17.00 -23.00 Free time with host families 23 June Tuesday 09.00-12.00 Meeting at Tenis club Visit To Governor and Mayor 12.00-13.30 Lunch (Sankopark McDonalds) 14.30- 17.00 Visit to Zeugma Mozaic Museum 17.00-23.00 Free time with host families 24 June Wednesday09.00-17.00 Trip to Halfeti,Birecik Dam, Boat Tour on the Fırat River 17.00- 23.00 Free time and diner with families 25 June Thursday 09.00-13.00 Meeting at Tenis club, Visit to Dülük Antique City 13.00-14.30 Lunch( Çamlıbel) 15.00-17.00 Swimming ( Çamlıbel) 20.00-24.00 Meeting Dinner and flag ceromony with Rotary Club( Grand Hotel) 26 June Friday 09.00-12.00 Meeting at Tenis club, Hasan Süzer Etnografy Museum , Old Churc,Kurtuluş mosque.
  • Hellenistic Greek Temples and Sanctuaries

    Hellenistic Greek Temples and Sanctuaries

    Hellenistic Greek Temples and Sanctuaries Late 4th centuries – 1st centuries BC Other Themes: - Corinthian Order - Dramatic Interiors - Didactic tradition The «Corinthian Order» The «Normalkapitelle» is just the standardization Epidauros’ Capital (prevalent in Roman times) whose origins lays in (The cauliculus is still not the Epudaros’ tholos. However during the present but volutes and Hellenistic period there were multiple versions of helixes are in the right the Corinthian capital. position) Bassae 1830 drawing So-Called Today the capital is “Normal Corinthian Capital», no preserved compared to Basse «Evolution» (???) of the Corinthian capital Choragic Monument of Lysikrates in Athens Late 4th Century BC First istance of Corinthian order used outside. Athens, Agora Temple of Olympian Zeus. FIRST PHASE. An earlier temple had stood there, constructed by the tyrant Peisistratus around 550 BC. The building was demolished after the death of Peisistratos and the construction of a colossal new Temple of Olympian Zeus was begun around 520 BC by his sons, Hippias and Hipparchos. The work was abandoned when the tyranny was overthrown and Hippias was expelled in 510 BC. Only the platform and some elements of the columns had been completed by this point, and the temple remained in this state for 336 years. The work was abandoned when the tyranny was overthrown and Hippias was expelled in 510 BC. Only the platform and some elements of the columns had been completed by this point, and the temple remained in this state for 336 years. SECOND PHASE (HELLENISTIC). It was not until 174 BC that the Seleucid king Antiochus IV Epiphanes, who presented himself as the earthly embodiment of Zeus, revived the project and placed the Roman architect Decimus Cossutius in charge.
  • İskenderun, Arsuz Ve Konacık Örneği

    İskenderun, Arsuz Ve Konacık Örneği

    Atatürk Üniversitesi Vet. Bil. Derg. Araştırma Makalesi 2012; 7(3): 167-175 İskenderun Körfezinde Küçük Çaplı Balıkçılığın Genel Durumu: İskenderun, Arsuz ve Konacık Örneği Mehmet Ferit CAN1, Demet SERPİN2, Mehmet Fatih CAN1 1. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi, Veteriner Fakültesi, Hayvan Sağlığı Ekonomisi ve İşletmeciliği AD. Antakya, Hatay. 2. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi, Su Ürünleri Fakültesi, Avlama ve İşleme Teknolojisi Bölümü, İskenderun, Hatay. Özet: Türkiye de küçük çaplı balıkçılık faaliyetinde kullanılan tekneler, toplam teknelerin % 90’nından fazlasını oluşturmak- tadır. İskenderun körfezi, Akdeniz’de en önemli önemli balıkçılık sahalardan biridir. Bu çalışmada, İskenderun körfezinde yer alan üç bölge (İskenderun, Arsuz ve Konacık) dikkate alınmıştır. Çalışmanın amacı, bu bölgelerdeki küçük çaplı balıkçılık ile uğraşan balıkçıların; (i) sosyo-ekonomik yapıları, (ii) balıkçılıkla ilgili çeşitli konulardaki görüşleri ve (iii) aynı zamanda sözü edilen konularla ilgili bölgeler arası benzerlik ve farklılıklarında ortaya konulmasıdır. Araştırma kapsamında ihtiyaç duyulan veriler İskenderun’dan 22, Arsuz’dan 13 ve Konacık’tan 8 olmak üzere toplam 43 adet balıkçı ile yüz yüze yapılan anketler- den elde edilmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda, bölgeler arası farklılıkta kapasite artırımı, yaş, iş, motor gücü (HP), Avrupa Birliği, av aracı ve mülkiyetin ayırt edici faktörler olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Balıkçıların önemli bir bölümünün balıkların muhafazası ve pazarlanması, sahil güvenlik, balık çiftlikleri ve büyük teknelerle ilgili sorunlar yaşadığı
  • Archaeology and History of Lydia from the Early Lydian Period to Late Antiquity (8Th Century B.C.-6Th Century A.D.)

    Archaeology and History of Lydia from the Early Lydian Period to Late Antiquity (8Th Century B.C.-6Th Century A.D.)

    Dokuz Eylül University – DEU The Research Center for the Archaeology of Western Anatolia – EKVAM Colloquia Anatolica et Aegaea Congressus internationales Smyrnenses IX Archaeology and history of Lydia from the early Lydian period to late antiquity (8th century B.C.-6th century A.D.). An international symposium May 17-18, 2017 / Izmir, Turkey ABSTRACTS Edited by Ergün Laflı Gülseren Kan Şahin Last Update: 21/04/2017. Izmir, May 2017 Websites: https://independent.academia.edu/TheLydiaSymposium https://www.researchgate.net/profile/The_Lydia_Symposium 1 This symposium has been dedicated to Roberto Gusmani (1935-2009) and Peter Herrmann (1927-2002) due to their pioneering works on the archaeology and history of ancient Lydia. Fig. 1: Map of Lydia and neighbouring areas in western Asia Minor (S. Patacı, 2017). 2 Table of contents Ergün Laflı, An introduction to Lydian studies: Editorial remarks to the abstract booklet of the Lydia Symposium....................................................................................................................................................8-9. Nihal Akıllı, Protohistorical excavations at Hastane Höyük in Akhisar………………………………10. Sedat Akkurnaz, New examples of Archaic architectural terracottas from Lydia………………………..11. Gülseren Alkış Yazıcı, Some remarks on the ancient religions of Lydia……………………………….12. Elif Alten, Revolt of Achaeus against Antiochus III the Great and the siege of Sardis, based on classical textual, epigraphic and numismatic evidence………………………………………………………………....13. Gaetano Arena, Heleis: A chief doctor in Roman Lydia…….……………………………………....14. Ilias N. Arnaoutoglou, Κοινὸν, συμβίωσις: Associations in Hellenistic and Roman Lydia……….……..15. Eirini Artemi, The role of Ephesus in the late antiquity from the period of Diocletian to A.D. 449, the “Robber Synod”.……………………………………………………………………….………...16. Natalia S. Astashova, Anatolian pottery from Panticapaeum…………………………………….17-18. Ayşegül Aykurt, Minoan presence in western Anatolia……………………………………………...19.
  • Three Conquests of Canaan

    Three Conquests of Canaan

    ÅA Wars in the Middle East are almost an every day part of Eero Junkkaala:of Three Canaan Conquests our lives, and undeniably the history of war in this area is very long indeed. This study examines three such wars, all of which were directed against the Land of Canaan. Two campaigns were conducted by Egyptian Pharaohs and one by the Israelites. The question considered being Eero Junkkaala whether or not these wars really took place. This study gives one methodological viewpoint to answer this ques- tion. The author studies the archaeology of all the geo- Three Conquests of Canaan graphical sites mentioned in the lists of Thutmosis III and A Comparative Study of Two Egyptian Military Campaigns and Shishak and compares them with the cities mentioned in Joshua 10-12 in the Light of Recent Archaeological Evidence the Conquest stories in the Book of Joshua. Altogether 116 sites were studied, and the com- parison between the texts and the archaeological results offered a possibility of establishing whether the cities mentioned, in the sources in question, were inhabited, and, furthermore, might have been destroyed during the time of the Pharaohs and the biblical settlement pe- riod. Despite the nature of the two written sources being so very different it was possible to make a comparative study. This study gives a fresh view on the fierce discus- sion concerning the emergence of the Israelites. It also challenges both Egyptological and biblical studies to use the written texts and the archaeological material togeth- er so that they are not so separated from each other, as is often the case.
  • Eskġçağ Anadolu'sunda Beslenme (M.Ö

    Eskġçağ Anadolu'sunda Beslenme (M.Ö

    ESKĠÇAĞ ANADOLU'SUNDA BESLENME (M.Ö. II. BĠN YILIN SONUNA KADAR) T.C. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi Tarih Anabilim Dalı Eskiçağ Tarihi Programı EBRU ACAR DanıĢman: Prof. Dr. Yusuf KILIÇ Temmuz 2019 DENĠZLĠ ÖNSÖZ Beslenme tüm yaĢayan canlıların hayatta kalabilmesi için son derece önem arz eden bir gereksinimdir. Tıpkı diğer canlılar gibi insanoğlu da gerek hayatta kalabilmek gerekse daha refah bir yaĢam sürdürebilmek için çeĢitli besin maddelerine ihtiyaç duymuĢtur. Bu ihtiyaçları ise genel olarak üç aĢamada temin etme yoluna gitmiĢtir. Bunlardan birincisi; yaĢadığı coğrafyada bulunan av hayvanlarını avlayarak, ikincisi; doğada yetiĢen doğal besin kaynaklarını toplayarak, üçüncü ve en önemlisi kabul edilen çeĢitli tarım ürünleri yetiĢtirerek ve bazı hayvanları evcilleĢtirerek sağlamıĢtır. Tarım ürünlerinden ise baĢta besin değeri yüksek ve uygun Ģartlar oluĢturulduğunda uzun süre bozulmadan saklanabilen buğday ve arpa gibi tahıl ürünleri önemli bir yere sahip olmuĢtur. Tahıl grubunun yanı sıra çeĢitli meyve ve sebzelerin yetiĢtirilmesi ile coğrafyaya göre uyum sağlayan deve, at, sığır, koyun, keçi, arı ve hatta domuz gibi hayvanların evcilleĢtirilerek etinden ve bu hayvanlardan elde edilen besin maddelerinden yararlanılmıĢtır. Eskiçağ Anadolu coğrafyasında yaĢayan toplumların beslenme alıĢkanlıklarını ele aldığımız tezimizde; Neolitik Dönemden baĢlayarak M.Ö. 2. bin yılın sonuna kadar geçen süre zarfında arkeolojik çalıĢmalar sonucu elde edilen bulgular, transkripti yapılmıĢ Asurca ve Hititçe çivi yazılı
  • Filmar Spal 18 Color.Indd

    Filmar Spal 18 Color.Indd

    SPAL Revista de Prehistoria y Arqueología de la Universidad de Sevilla 18 2009 Sevilla 2011 Reservados todos los derechos. Ni la totalidad ni parte de este libro puede re- producirse o transmitirse por ningún procedimiento electrónico o mecánico, in- cluyendo fotocopia, grabación y sistema de recuperación, sin permiso escrito de los editores CONSEJO DE REDACCIÓN DIRECTOR Fernando Amores Carredano (Universidad de Sevilla) Secretario Eduardo Ferrer Albelda (Universidad de Sevilla) Vocales José Beltrán Fortes (Universidad de Sevilla) Rosario Cabrero García (Universidad de Sevilla) Leonardo García Sanjuán (Universidad de Sevilla) Rosario Cruz-Auñón Briones (Universidad de Sevilla) Enrique García Vargas (Universidad de Sevilla) Victor Hurtado Pérez (Universidad de Sevilla) José Luis Escacena Carrasco (Universidad de Sevilla) Consejo Asesor Científico Manuel Acién Almansa (Universidad de Málaga) Manuel Bendala Galán (Universidad Autónoma de Madrid) Germán Delibes de Castro (Universidad de Valladolid) Carlos Fabiao (Universidad de Lisboa) Mauro S. Hernández Pérez (Universidad de Alicante) Bernat Martí Oliver (Servicio de Investigación y Museo de Prehistoria. Diputación de Valencia) M.ª Isabel Martínez Navarrete (Centro de Estudios Históricos. CSIC) Marisa Ruiz-Gálvez Priego (Universidad Complutense de Madrid) Gonzalo Ruiz Zapatero (Universidad Complutense de Madrid) Spal es una revista de Prehistoria y Arqueología que tiene como objetivo publicar artículos origi- nales, notas y recensiones con una cobertura temática amplia, que abarca aspectos teóricos y me- todológicos de la Arqueología y estudios por períodos cronológicos, desde el Paleolítico hasta la Arqueología Industrial. Se dará prioridad a los trabajos centrados en el sur peninsular, aunque tam- bién tendrán cabida aquellos que se refieran a la Península Ibérica y el Mediterráneo occidental.
  • From Small States to Universalism in the Pre-Islamic Near East

    From Small States to Universalism in the Pre-Islamic Near East

    REVOLUTIONIZING REVOLUTIONIZING Mark Altaweel and Andrea Squitieri and Andrea Mark Altaweel From Small States to Universalism in the Pre-Islamic Near East This book investigates the long-term continuity of large-scale states and empires, and its effect on the Near East’s social fabric, including the fundamental changes that occurred to major social institutions. Its geographical coverage spans, from east to west, modern- day Libya and Egypt to Central Asia, and from north to south, Anatolia to southern Arabia, incorporating modern-day Oman and Yemen. Its temporal coverage spans from the late eighth century BCE to the seventh century CE during the rise of Islam and collapse of the Sasanian Empire. The authors argue that the persistence of large states and empires starting in the eighth/ seventh centuries BCE, which continued for many centuries, led to new socio-political structures and institutions emerging in the Near East. The primary processes that enabled this emergence were large-scale and long-distance movements, or population migrations. These patterns of social developments are analysed under different aspects: settlement patterns, urban structure, material culture, trade, governance, language spread and religion, all pointing at population movement as the main catalyst for social change. This book’s argument Mark Altaweel is framed within a larger theoretical framework termed as ‘universalism’, a theory that explains WORLD A many of the social transformations that happened to societies in the Near East, starting from Andrea Squitieri the Neo-Assyrian period and continuing for centuries. Among other infl uences, the effects of these transformations are today manifested in modern languages, concepts of government, universal religions and monetized and globalized economies.