DOCSLIB.ORG

MERCY CORPS and AFFILIATES Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplemental Schedules June 30, 2014 (With Independent Auditors’ Report Thereon)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MERCY CORPS and AFFILIATES Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplemental Schedules June 30, 2014 (With Independent Auditors’ Report Thereon) MERCY CORPS AND AFFILIATES Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplemental Schedules June 30, 2014 (With Independent Auditors’ Report Thereon) MERCY CORPS AND AFFILIATES Table of Contents Page(s) Independent Auditors’ Report 1–2 Consolidated Financial Statements: Consolidated Statement of Financial Position 3 Consolidated Statement of Activities 4 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows 5 Consolidated Statement of Functional Expenses 6 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 7–28 Supplemental Schedules 29 Schedule I – Supplemental Schedule – Mercy Corps Statement of Financial Position 30 Schedule II – Supplemental Schedule – Mercy Corps Statement of Activities 31 KPMG LLP Suite 3800 1300 South West Fifth Avenue Portland, OR 97201 Independent Auditors’ Report The Board of Directors Mercy Corps and affiliates: We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Mercy Corps and affiliates, which comprise the consolidated statement of financial position as of June 30, 2014, and the related consolidated statements of activities, cash flows, and functional expenses for the year then ended, and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements. Management’s Responsibility for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Auditors’ Responsibility Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditors’ judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditors consider internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion. Opinion In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Mercy Corps and affiliates as of June 30, 2014, and the changes in their net assets, cash flows, and functional expenses for the year then ended, in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. KPMG LLP is a Delaware limited liability partnership, the U.S. member firm of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Report on Summarized Comparative Information We have previously audited Mercy Corps and affiliates 2013 consolidated financial statements, and we expressed an unmodified audit opinion on those consolidated financial statements in our report dated November 4, 2013. In our opinion, the summarized comparative information presented herein as of and for the year ended June 30, 2013 is consistent, in all material respects, with the audited consolidated financial statements from which it has been derived. Other Matter Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the consolidated financial statements as a whole. The supplemental information included in schedules I and II is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the consolidated financial statements. Such information is the responsibility of management and was derived from and relates directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the consolidated financial statements. The information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the consolidated financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the consolidated financial statements or to the consolidated financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the information is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the consolidated financial statements as a whole. Portland, Oregon October 31, 2014 2 MERCY CORPS AND AFFILIATES Consolidated Statement of Financial Position June 30, 2014 With comparative financial information as of June 30, 2013 (In thousands) Assets 2014 2013 Cash $ 69,161 63,621 Financial instruments and derivatives, net 3,866 3,725 Grants and accounts receivable 15,985 11,679 Microfinance loans receivable, net 79,597 77,042 Due from unconsolidated affiliates, net 7,873 8,864 Inventories 5,833 7,503 Prepaid expenses, deposits, and other assets 7,049 6,720 Pledges receivable, net 2,512 955 Notes receivable 10,988 10,988 Investments 4,621 3,871 Program-related investments 5,352 6,562 Property and equipment, net 40,457 41,915 Total assets $ 253,294 243,445 Liabilities and Net Assets Liabilities: Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $ 35,032 28,748 Deferred revenue 38,595 38,834 Subsidiary and subordinated debt for microfinancing activities 81,325 74,228 Long-term debt 24,312 24,330 Total liabilities 179,264 166,140 Net assets: Unrestricted 53,030 57,071 Temporarily restricted 21,000 20,214 Permanently restricted — 20 Total net assets 74,030 77,305 Total liabilities and net assets $ 253,294 243,445 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 3 MERCY CORPS AND AFFILIATES Consolidated Statement of Activities Year ended June 30, 2014 With summarized financial information for the year ended June 30, 2013 (In thousands) Temporarily Permanently 2013 Unrestricted restricted restricted Totals Total Operating support and revenue: Public support and revenue: Government grants $ 172,598 — — 172,598 159,667 Material aid 12,406 — — 12,406 11,099 Material aid – monetized 9,924 — — 9,924 9,200 Total public support and revenue 194,928 — — 194,928 179,966 Private support and revenue: Other grants 47,183 11 — 47,194 32,370 Contributions 22,623 13,336 — 35,959 25,020 Gifts in kind – services 574 — — 574 672 Total private support and revenue 70,380 13,347 — 83,727 58,062 Other revenue: Interest income 27,005 — — 27,005 27,468 Other revenue 1,067 — — 1,067 1,825 Total other revenue 28,072 — — 28,072 29,293 Net assets released from restriction 12,581 (12,561) (20) — — Total operating support and revenue 305,961 786 (20) 306,727 267,321 Operating expenses: Program services: Humanitarian assistance – relief 86,172 — — 86,172 62,074 Humanitarian assistance – recovery 15,678 — — 15,678 16,313 Livelihood/economic development 79,585 — — 79,585 83,952 Civil society and education 46,056 — — 46,056 43,900 Health 33,475 — — 33,475 25,619 Total program services 260,966 — — 260,966 231,858 Supporting services: General and administrative 33,411 — — 33,411 28,730 Resource development 14,490 — — 14,490 11,485 Total supporting services 47,901 — — 47,901 40,215 Total operating expenses 308,867 — — 308,867 272,073 Change in net assets from operations (2,906) 786 (20) (2,140) (4,752) Nonoperating revenue and losses net: Foreign currency exchange loss, net (2,566) — — (2,566) (932) Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments, net (808) — — (808) 536 Unrealized gain on swap agreements 1,743 — — 1,743 214 Other nonoperating (decrease) increase in net assets 496 — — 496 (171) Total nonoperating revenue and losses net (1,135) — — (1,135) (353) Change in net assets (4,041) 786 (20) (3,275) (5,105) Net assets at beginning of year 57,071 20,214 20 77,305 82,410 Net assets at end of year $ 53,030 21,000 — 74,030 77,305 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 4 MERCY CORPS AND AFFILIATES Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows Year ended June 30, 2014 With summarized financial information for the year ended June 30, 2013 (In thousands) 2014 2013 Cash flows from operating activities: Change in net assets $ (3,275) (5,105) Adjustments to reconcile change in net assets to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: Depreciation and amortization 4,210 4,332 Provision for loan losses 929 559 Net realized and unrealized loss on investments 3,206 429 Unrealized gain on interest rate and foreign exchange swaps (1,743) (214) Loss on disposition of fixed assets 1,578 226 Changes in assets and liabilities: Grants and accounts receivable (4,334) (259) Due from unconsolidated affiliates, net 991 (751) Inventories 1,670 (502) Prepaid expenses,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Football Foundation Targets New Goals, While Mercy Corps Europe Diversifies Its Donor Base
    DATA CHARITY 250 INDEX Football Foundation targets new goals, while Mercy Corps Europe diversifies its donor base Diane Sim reports on a strong quarter for the Charity 250 Index It is against this backdrop that the and on the fundraising challenges faced by telethons. results of BBC Children in Need are striking, not simply because the children’s charity reported a 6 per cent SPONSORED BY levels, the increase in EC/ECHO increase in voluntary income but also funding serves to reduce the charity’s because voluntary income accounts for reliance on UK government funding. over 90 per cent of its total income. This fell from 57 per cent of all Launched in 1980, BBC Children institutional funding in 2016 to 37 per in Need is the oldest of a handful THE TOP performing charity in this cent in 2017. Donor diversification and of UK telethons. Two others are run month’s review of the haysmacintyre / the expansion of European funding in alternate years by Comic Relief: Charity Finance 250 Index is the sources is a key strategic objective of Red Nose Day, which was launched Football Foundation, which has more MCE, which has set up a new office in in 1985, and Sport Relief, which than doubled its annual income to Geneva to mitigate the impact of the launched in 2002. Meanwhile, Stand £68.4m in the financial year ending UK’s exit from the European Union. up to Cancer was launched by Cancer 31 May 2017. Research UK and Channel 4 in 2012. The increase results from a As fundraising activities, telethons new long-term National Football “ The expansion of enjoy obvious advantages such as high Facilities Strategy to direct all facility European funding is a exposure and strong brand recognition.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    2012 ANNUAL REPORT Front cover: South Sudan — Cassandra Nelson/Mercy Corps Opposite page (from left to right): CAR – Sean Sheridan for Mercy Corps, Guatemala — Miguel Samper for Mercy Corps, Haiti — Devan Wardwell for Mercy Corps Neal Keny-Guyer, Chief Executive Officer EMERGENCY RESponSE When natural disaster strikes without warning, when conflict drives families from their homes, there’s no time to waste. Mercy Corps delivers lifesaving aid to help hard-hit communities survive, recover and rebuild. READ THE LATEST STORIES: mercycorps.org/ emergency-response SYRIA Among the refugees fleeing violence in Syria were tens of thousands of children. In the Jordan camps where D. R. CONGO they took shelter, we built safe places for kids to play. Soon after rebels captured eastern Congo’s largest city, We delivered books and school supplies so they could Goma, banks and stores shut down. The result: food continue their education. We provided water to shortages. We distributed emergency rations of flour, 400,000 refugees and their host families. We also oil and fortified grains to 11,000 urban families that brought our psychosocial program, developed by were displaced by the fighting. Our team also rerouted experts, to help young Syrian refugees in Lebanon food to camps on the outskirts of the city, where families heal from the trauma. We used art, sports and fleeing the conflict took shelter. We provided temporary games to provide emotional support while teaching shelter for 3,000 orphans. And we helped meet urgent cooperation, self-expression, empathy and leadership needs for clean water and sanitation facilities in camps to young people and their families.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Partnerships: a Guide for Partnering with Civil Society, Business and Government Groups Local Partnerships Guide
    Local Partnerships: A guide for partnering with civil society, business and government groups Local Partnerships Guide Table of Contents Chapter 1. Mercy Corps’ Commitment to Local Partnership 3 1.1. Partnerships Lie at the Heart of the Vision for Change. 3 1.2. Why Work in Partnership?. 4 1.3. Principles of Partnership. 5 Chapter 2. Types of Partnerships 7 2.1. Civil Society Partnerships . 8 2.2. Local Government Partnerships. 11 2.3. Private Sector Partnerships. 12 2.4. Cross-sector Partnerships. 15 2.5. Partnership in Emergencies. 17 2.6. Networks and Coalitions. 20 2.7. Global Partnerships . 21 Chapter 3. Working with Local Partners 22 3.1. Framework for Partnering. 22 3.2. When to Work in Partnership. 24 3.3. Identifying and Building Partnerships. 26 3.4. Managing and Maintaining Partnerships. .28 3.5. Monitoring, Evaluating and Reporting. 37 3.6. Sustaining Outcomes and Impact. 42 Chapter 4. Tools and Resources 44 4.1. Tools. .44 4.2. Resources and Links. .45 Annexes A. Mercy Corps Capacity Statement for Local Partnerships B. Government Donor Partnering Guidelines - the current guidelines from US and European donors about working with local partners, plus trends and other information C. Measuring Partnerships Using Mission Metrics: Indicator Guidelines for Themes 5 and 8 Local Partnerships: A guide for partnering with civil society, business and government groups © was first published in 2011. This guide was developed for Mercy Corps by Ruth Allen, Director of Governance and Partnerships, with significant contributions from Anna Young, Bill Farrell, Mandal Urtnasan, Iveta Ouvry, Veena Sampathkumar, Barbara Willett, Brandy Westerman, Dory McIntosh, Ted Volchok and Sanjay Gurung.
    [Show full text]
  • Read the Report
    2 0 0 5 a n n u a l r e p o r t You must be“ the change you wish to see in the world. ” — Gandhi Be the change. HEROES, NOT VICTIMS OUR MISSION HOW WE WORK Mercy Corps exists to alleviate suffering, poverty In our 25 years of experience, Mercy Corps has n a year of unprecedented disasters, the amazing and oppression by helping people build secure, learned that communities recovering from war or productive and just communities. social upheaval must be the agents of their own resilience of people the world over has been a triumph we transformation for change to endure. Making can all celebrate. Although millions of people are caught OUR CORE VALUES this happen requires communities, government I ■ We believe in the intrinsic value and dignity and businesses to solve problems in a spirit of in intolerable situations, in the midst of it all, they find the of human life. accountability and full participation. Ultimately, courage to survive, overcome and rebuild. ■ We are awed by human resilience, and believe in secure, productive and just communities arise only the ability of all people to thrive, not just exist. when all three sectors work together as three legs of a For every image of destruction and despair, there are stable stool. ■ Our spiritual and humanitarian values thousands of stories of inspiration. In this year’s report, compel us to act. WHAT WE DO we give voice to some of these remarkable individuals, from ■ We believe that all people have the right to ■ Emergency Relief live in peaceful communities and participate Indonesians recovering from the Indian Ocean tsunami to ■ Economic Development fully in the decisions that affect their lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Table A: List of All Commitments/Contributions and Pledges As of 17 February 2010 (Table Ref: R10)
    Table A: List of all commitments/contributions and pledges as of 17 February 2010 http://www.reliefweb.int/fts (Table ref: R10) Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by donors and appealing organizations. Donor Channel Description Funding Uncommitted USD Pledges USD 3Com American RC Disaster relief 10,000 0 3M NGOs Working with key humanitarian partners like 1,000,000 0 Project HOPE and MAP International, 3M has donated numerous boxes and cases containing medical supplies such as Nexcare bandages, 3M Tegaderm transparent dressings, sterile drapes, splints, medical tapes and respiratory protection products. 3M continues to work closely with its nonprofit partners to identify other 3M products that may be needed. Abbott Laboratories UN Agencies, In-kind: Donations of medicines and nutritional 1,000,000 0 NGOs and Red products Cross ACE Charitable Foundation American RC Humanitarian assistance 250,000 0 Actavis Group NGOs Donation from Actavis in the US to Americares 10,000 0 and Operation Smile for health response in Haiti. Actavis Group NGOs; Red Donation of generic drugs, including analgesics 2,100,840 0 Cross and antibiotics. Advent Software PIH Humanitarian assistance 0 25,000 Adventist Development ADRA-Haiti Emergency assistance 0 478,000 and Relief Agency Adventist Development ADRA-Haiti Emergency assistance 0 522,000 and Relief Agency Aetna Foundation MSF Haiti relief efforts 10,000 0 Aetna Foundation American RC Haiti relief efforts 10,000 0 Aetna Foundation Food for the Haiti relief efforts 10,000 0 Poor Aetna Foundation UM For medical missions to Port-au-Prince, 10,000 0 including neurosurgeons, orthopedic surgeons and trauma/emergency physicians.
    [Show full text]
  • ADVANCING PEACE in a CHANGED WORLD COVID-19 Effects on Conflict and How to Respond SEPTEMBER 2020
    Kaduna, Nigeria | Emmanuel Bamidele for Mercy Corps ADVANCING PEACE IN A CHANGED WORLD COVID-19 effects on conflict and how to respond SEPTEMBER 2020 Introduction Dire predictions regarding the impact of COVID-19 on armed conflict and violence have proliferated since the pandemic began. One notable forecast projects that thirteen countries are likely to experience new conflicts in the next two years due to the exacerbating effects of the pandemic. COVID-19 is now widely understood as a potential threat multiplier that can amplify existing conflict drivers, as well as an accelerant of existing conflict processes that can hasten a spiral into deeper instability. Research from past pandemics, like HIV/AIDS and Ebola, makes clear that exposure to infectious disease increases the risk of armed conflict. Conflict, in turn, tends to exacerbate disease transmission and hinder public health responses. Pandemics have a similar effect as other external shocks, such as natural disasters (hurricanes, earthquakes, floods, and droughts), extreme temperature rise, declines in export prices and economic crises—all of which are associated with the outbreak or intensification of conflict within a year of onset, especially in low-income and ethno-linguistically fragmented countries. On the other hand, COVID-19 could present opportunities for governments, donors, and practitioners to catalyze some positive trends toward peace while blunting the political, economic, and social consequences of the virus. Before these opportunities recede, the international community must ensure that crucial investments to address conflict drivers—both those that predate the pandemic and those that have been exacerbated by it—are not diverted elsewhere, while proactively anticipating and preventing COVID-19’s worst impacts in conflict-affected contexts.
    [Show full text]
  • THE LEGACY of MERCY CORPS MONGOLIA a 22 Years Summative Report MAY 2021 MERCY CORPS MONGOLIA DONORS and PARTNERS
    THE LEGACY OF MERCY CORPS MONGOLIA A 22 Years Summative Report MAY 2021 MERCY CORPS MONGOLIA DONORS AND PARTNERS Key Donors Mercy Corps would like to gratefully acknowledge the financial support of our donors, without whom the achievements described herein would not have been possible. Over 22 years, Mercy Corps Mongolia has received $66 million USD in funding from these and other generous donors to strengthen rural communities. A special thanks to the United States Agency for International Development and the United States Department of Agriculture, that has been a partner throughout Mercy Corps’ entire 22 year tenure in Mongolia, providing more than 70% of our funding totaling $52 million USD. United States Agency for International Development (USAID) The Adventurists United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Texas Agricultural Experiment Station (TAES) Office of oreignF Disaster Assistance/ Bureau of European Commission Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection Humanitarian Assistance (USAID) (ECHO) Mercy Corps- Internally Restricted Funds Asian Development Bank (ADB) Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) World Food Programme (WFP) Government of Mongolia British Embassy World Bank Key Partners It has been through collaboration with international, national, and local partners in the public and private sector that Mercy Corps was able to contribute to lasting, transformative change to rural Mongolia. International Partners PACT Associates for Rural Development (ARD) Land O’ Lakes People in Need (ECHO-PIN) The Asia Foundation
    [Show full text]
  • Npt-Annual-Report-2011.Pdf
    2011 ANNUAL REPORT This year, National Philanthropic Trust—through the BOARD OF TRUSTEES generosity of our donors—is reaching new milestones. Jeffrey R. Lauterbach Chair As of 2011, NPT is managing more than $1 billion in charitable assets. In the past 12 months, we’ve Gennaro J. Fulvio also added a new supporting organization—the Saint Eileen R. Heisman Agatha Foundation—and made a record number of Dirk Jungé international grants. Joseph H. Kluger Rosalyn McPherson Cecilia Mendez Hodes As you read through this year’s annual report, we Helen H. Miller hope you are as touched and impressed by our donors’ Sharon Mueller commitment to giving as we are. This year’s increase June Noronha in contributions signals a commitment to future Clark D. Pitcairn Wayne R. Walker philanthropy, while many of the grants we make assist today’s most pressing needs. SENIOR MANAGEMENT NPT is about to enter into its fifteenth year. Each day, we are proud to honor our mission of increasing Eileen R. Heisman President and CEO philanthropy in society. We remain dedicated to serving our generous donors and thank them for helping us Thomas J. Grace reach new heights in 2011. Chief Operating Officer Warm Regards, Margaret A. Bandera Vice President and Treasurer Andrew W. Hastings Vice President Business Development Eileen R. Heisman Diane L. Fitzgerald President + CEO Assistant Vice President Donor Services Photos on the cover depict a variety of philanthropic initiatives made possible by organizations receiving grant support from NPT donor-advised funds. From right to left: assisting earthquake victims in Japan (Japanese Red Cross Society), delivering clean water for a mountain community in Honduras (Water for People/Marei Burnfield), enabling poor communities in India to realize their potential (The globalislocal Fund/Liz Ellers), building homes for families in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Mobilization Programming
    Guide to Community Mobilization Programming mercycorps.org Guide to Community Mobilization Programming Table of Contents What Does it Mean to be “Community-led”? . 3 How to Use this Guide . 4 1. Principles of Community Mobilization . 7 1 1. Participation . 8 1 .2 Accountability . 8 1 .3 Good Governance . 9 1 .4 Peaceful Change . .10 2. Mercy Corps’ Community Mobilization Approach . 11 2 1. The Mobilization Framework . 12 2 .2 Levels of Mobilization . 14 2 .3 Integrating Community Mobilization Methodologies into Other Programs . .16 2 .4 Ensuring Community-led Programming . .16 3. Impact Examples . .19 3 1. Georgia: Can Mobilization Work in an Emergency? . .19 3 .2 Indonesia: Mobilizing Urban Communities . .21 3 .3 Mongolia: Engaging Government Partners . .23 3 .4 Zimbabwe: Leveraging a Community Fund and Private Sector Partnerships . .25 4. Implementing Community Mobilization . .27 4 1. Pre-Positioning . .30 4 .2 Assessment and Planning . .34 4 .3 Structures and Agreements . .40 4 .4 Leadership and Capacity Building . .43 4 .5 Monitoring and Learning . 47 4 6. Re-positioning . 52 4 7. Handover . 54 5. Mercy Corps Community Mobilization Experience and Resources . 57 5 1. The Evolution of Community Mobilization’s Role in Mercy Corps’ Strategic Vision . 57 5 .2 Capacity Statement . 60 5 .3 Field Studies . 63 Annexes . .65 Annex 1: Tools for Community Mobilization . 65 Annex 2: Embedding Conflict Management Tools in the Community Mobilization Process . 67 Annex 3: Mobilizing with New Media and Information and Communication Technologies . 70 Annex 4: Community Mobilization and Disaster Risk Reduction . 73 Annex 5: Sample Position Descriptions . 75 Annex 6: Sample Indicators, Logframe and Workplan .
    [Show full text]
  • Social Service Internship/Job Sites
    Social Service Internship/Job Sites Search for possible internship sites/jobs in nonprofit organizations, community centers, government agencies, educational institutions, etc. Albertina Kerr Centers - http://www.albertinakerr.org/ - Developmental disabilities & mental health services. Alliance for a Healthier Generation - http://www.healthiergeneration.org/ - Addresses childhood obesity. American Cancer Society - https://www.cancer.org/about-us/employment-opportunities.html - Runs public health advertising campaigns, and organizes projects such as the Relay for Life and the Great American Smokeout. American Overseas Domestic Violence Crisis Center (AODVC) - https://greatnonprofits.org/org/americans-overseas-domestic-violence-crisis-center - Services to Americans experiencing domestic violence in a foreign country, including a international toll free 24/7 crisis line, advocacy, safety planning & case management, relocation assistance, emergency funds, housing counseling & legal assistance. American Red Cross - http://www.redcross.org/local/oregon ; Search database for opportunities at https://www.redcross.org/about-us/careers.html - Provides relief to single-family, multi-family & community emergencies; national & international disasters; and helps people to prevent, prepare for & respond to disasters Bitch Media - https://bitchmedia.org/jobs-and-internships - Nonprofit, independent, feminist media organization that publishes a quarterly magazine, daily online articles, & weekly podcasts. Offers events coordinator & editorial internships. Boys & Girls Aid - http://boysandgirlsaid.org/ - Offers shelter & housing services for youth 10 to 23-years-old, adoption & foster care services, etc. Bradley-Angle House - https://bradleyangle.org/ - Shelter for survivors of domestic & sexual violence & 24 hour crisis line. Caldera - https://www.calderaarts.org/get-involved1 - Arts education for underserved youth & adults: provide help with special events, youth program support, administrative projects & artists with youth experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Addressing the Second-Order Impacts of COVID-19: Recommendations to the Biden-Harris Administration JANUARY 2021
    Addressing the Second-Order Impacts of COVID-19: Recommendations to the Biden-Harris Administration JANUARY 2021 For over a year, the COVID-19 pandemic has devastated countries and communities across the world. As of early January 2021, over 88 million people have contracted the disease globally, resulting in over 1.9 million deaths - even this is likely an underestimate due to inadequate testing and disease surveillance systems.1 Beyond the direct health impacts of the virus, the pandemic has had disastrous effects on global inequality and threatens to roll back decades of development gains. A recent report by the Gates Foundation found that global health progress was set back by 25 years in just 25 weeks.2 The spread of COVID-19 has also obliterated economic opportunity around the world. With global economic activity dropping as much as 7.6 percent in 2020, country-wide shutdowns and border closures exacerbated dire livelihood situations in a number of already-fragile countries.3 Government expenditures of over $12 trillion so far in the pandemic response continue to place heavy strain on countries, especially those with limited political and financial resources to expend.4 Some of the most severe and long-lasting impacts of the pandemic will be those on food security, employment, local markets, gender equality, and sustainable peace. For the first time in two decades, extreme poverty is expected to rise. The World Bank estimates that because of COVID-19’s spread, an additional 150 million people -- just under 10% of the world’s entire population -- could be pushed into extreme poverty.5 “There is a serious risk of a grand reversal of the substantial global progress over the last 50 years in reducing poverty, increasing life expectancy, improving literacy and access to education and reducing hunger.” — Mark Lowcock The Biden-Harris Administration must take decisive action to prevent the backsliding of decades of progress and to address the aftershocks facing vulnerable communities worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • DRIVING RESILIENCE Market Approaches to Disaster Recovery SEPTEMBER 2017 Table of Contents
    Tom Van Cakenberghe for Mercy Corps DRIVING RESILIENCE Market approaches to disaster recovery SEPTEMBER 2017 Table of Contents Acknowledgements 3 Executive summary 3 Introduction: New approaches to an old problem 4 What we know: Insights from research and practice 5 Financial support systems 6 Social support systems 10 Physical support systems 12 Good practices to support post-disaster recovery and resilience 13 Analyze markets frequently 13 Support market systems, not just individual enterprises 13 Utilize responsive and adaptive implementation strategies 14 Plan for longer time-frames, even in a disaster response 16 Aim for long-term resilience 16 From learning to action 17 Actions for donors 17 Actions for implementers 18 Case studies Early market facilitation: Experiences from Nepal 20 Support to the market system: Resilience and response in Ethiopia 23 Appendices Issues brief development process 25 Resources: Issues brief 26 MERCY CORPS Driving resilience: Market approaches to disaster recovery A 2 Acknowledgements This issues brief was written by Sarah Ward, Alison Hemberger, and Sasha Muench, with editing support from Dave Algoso and Alyssa Cogan. We would like to thank the Mercy Corps Nepal team, particularly Prasanna Pradham, Sanja Karecki, Julie Koehler, and Chet Tamang, for hosting a consultation on this topic and providing critical insights. Thea Anderson, Allison Shean, Netsaalem Bahiru, and Olga Petryniak also provided input and reviews. This issues brief would not have been possible without the support and convening power of the SEEP network, and the thoughtful research and consultation of our peers beyond Mercy Corps. Finally, we’d like to thank JPMorgan Chase & Co. for their financial support in completing this issues brief.* Executive Summary After a disaster, the immediate concern of all humanitarian responders is—and should be—to help affected populations meet their basic, urgent needs.
    [Show full text]