DOCSLIB.ORG

Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Minerals and Waste

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Minerals and Waste Nottinghamshire and Nottingham Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Minerals and Waste Final Living Document April 2011 Prepared for www.urs-scottwilson.com Nottinghamshire County Council & Nottingham City Council Level 1 Minerals & Waste SFRA Revision Schedule Level 1 Minerals and Waste Strategic Flood Risk Assessment April 2011 Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by D1 March 2011 Draft Helen Burton Michael Timmins Chris Broome Assistant Flood Risk Principal Flood Risk Principal Engineer Specialist Specialist Victoria Raiment Andrew Woodliffe Graduate Water Scientist Principal Flood Risk Specialist D2 March 2011 Draft Helen Burton Michael Timmins Chris Broome Assistant Flood Risk Principal Flood Risk Principal Engineer Specialist Specialist F1 April 2011 Final Helen Burton Andrew Woodliffe Chris Broome Assistant Flood Risk Principal Flood Risk Principal Engineer Specialist Specialist URS/ Scott Wilson Royal Court Basil Close Chesterfield This document has been prepared in accordance with the scope of Scott Wilson's Derbyshire appointment with its client and is subject to the terms of that appointment. It is addressed to and for the sole and confidential use and reliance of Scott Wilson's client. Scott Wilson S41 7SL accepts no liability for any use of this document other than by its client and only for the purposes for which it was prepared and provided. No person other than the client may copy (in whole or in part) use or rely on the contents of this document, without the prior Tel: 01246 209221 written permission of the Company Secretary of Scott Wilson Ltd. Any advice, opinions, or recommendations within this document should be read and relied upon only in the Fax: 01246 209229 context of the document as a whole. The contents of this document do not provide legal or tax advice or opinion. © Scott Wilson Ltd 2011 www. urs -scottwilson.com Nottinghamshire County Council & Nottingham City Council Level 1 Minerals & Waste SFRA Table of Contents Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Pro Forma .......................................... 8 Executive Summary ................................................................................ 9 1 Introduction ................................................................................ 12 1.1 Commission............................................................................................................12 1.2 Background ............................................................................................................12 1.3 SFRA Structure ......................................................................................................13 1.4 SFRA Aims and Objectives.....................................................................................15 2 Study Area ................................................................................. 16 2.1 General Overview...................................................................................................16 2.2 Geology..................................................................................................................18 2.3 Current Minerals Extraction Situation......................................................................18 2.4 Current Waste Management Situation ....................................................................20 2.5 Watercourses .........................................................................................................21 3 Policy Context ............................................................................ 22 3.1 Planning Policy Overview .......................................................................................22 3.2 European Policy .....................................................................................................24 3.3 National Policies .....................................................................................................25 3.4 Regional Policies ....................................................................................................34 3.5 Adopted Local Plans...............................................................................................41 3.6 Minerals and Waste Development Frameworks......................................................42 4 The PPS25 Sequential Test ....................................................... 44 4.1 The Sequential Approach .......................................................................................44 4.2 Using the SFRA to Apply the Sequential Test.........................................................45 4.3 Using the SFRA Maps, Data and GIS Layers .........................................................49 5 The Exception Test & Level 2 SFRAs ........................................ 53 5.1 When is the Exception Test Required?...................................................................53 5.2 The Exception Test Process ...................................................................................53 5.3 What is a Level 2 SFRA?........................................................................................54 5.4 When is a Level 2 SFRA Required? .......................................................................54 6 Level 1 SFRA Methodology........................................................ 56 6.1 Overview ................................................................................................................56 6.2 Tasks......................................................................................................................56 6.3 Stakeholder Consultation........................................................................................56 Final Level 1 SFRA April 2011 3 Nottinghamshire County Council & Nottingham City Council Level 1 Minerals & Waste SFRA 6.4 Data / Information Collected ...................................................................................59 6.5 Data Presentation – GIS Layers .............................................................................60 6.6 GIS Data Gaps and Assumptions ...........................................................................61 7 Review of Flood Risk in Nottinghamshire ................................... 78 7.1 Introduction.............................................................................................................78 7.2 Historical Flooding ..................................................................................................78 7.3 Fluvial and Tidal Flooding.......................................................................................79 7.4 Flooding from Land (Pluvial/Surface Water Flooding and Overland Flow) ..............85 7.5 Groundwater Flooding ............................................................................................85 7.6 Sewers Flooding.....................................................................................................85 7.7 Flooding from Canals, Reservoirs and other Artificial Sources................................86 7.8 Existing Flood Risk Management in Nottinghamshire .............................................89 7.9 Flood Warning Areas..............................................................................................90 7.10 Emergency Planning and Flood Risk ......................................................................91 7.11 Potential Future Minerals Sites and Flood Risk.......................................................92 7.12 Waste Management and Flood Risk .......................................................................93 7.13 Climate Change and Future Flood Risk ..................................................................94 8 Future Flood Risk Management Options .................................... 95 8.2 Sustainable Flood Risk Management......................................................................95 8.3 Sequential Working and Restoration of Minerals Sites............................................97 8.4 Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) ..................................................................99 9 Site Specific FRA Guidance ..................................................... 101 9.1 Introduction...........................................................................................................101 9.2 When is a FRA Necessary?..................................................................................102 9.3 What are the Requirements of a FRA? .................................................................102 9.4 FRA Staged Approach..........................................................................................103 9.5 Flood Zone 1 ........................................................................................................104 9.6 Flood Zone 2 ........................................................................................................104 9.7 Flood Zone 3a ......................................................................................................104 9.8 Flood Zone 3b ......................................................................................................105 9.9 Management of Surface Water Runoff..................................................................106 9.10 Residual Risk........................................................................................................106 Appendix A: County Overview Maps Appendix B: Detailed Mapping - Fluvial Appendix C: Detailed Mapping – Pluvial Final Level 1 SFRA April 2011 4 Nottinghamshire County Council & Nottingham City Council
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Notification of Seismic Surveys – INEOS Upstream Ltd Derbyshire County Council
    Notification of Seismic Surveys – INEOS Upstream Ltd Derbyshire County Council May 2017 Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Justification for Permitted Development 6 3. Environment of the Survey Area 11 4. Survey Methodology 20 5. Summary and Requirements for Proposed Seismic Survey 38 Appendix 1: List of Designations and Sensitivities Appendix 2: Seismic Source Safe Operating Distances and PPV Monitoring Appendix 3: Preliminary Environmental Method Statement Contact Matthew Sheppard [email protected] May 2017 1. Introduction 1.1 Summary 1.1 This report is submitted to Derbyshire County Council to outline INEOS Upstream Ltd.’s (hereafter INEOS) proposed geophysical (seismic) survey operations in the area shown in Map 1. In total the survey area covers 250.7 km2 (approximately 25,000 ha). Derbyshire County Council is the Mineral Planning Authority (MPA) for 90.8 km2 of the whole survey area. 1.2 This report should be read with the accompanying document “INEOS Shale Seismic Surveying Methodology: East Midlands Seismic Survey 2017” – hereafter termed the Method Statement, which outlines the survey methods to be used and embedded environmental operative measures in place. Environmental operative measures for site specific environmental considerations are outlined in Section 4.6 and Appendices 1-3 of this report. The 3D seismic survey that INEOS proposed is described in Section 4.2 of this report. Map 1: Boundary and Location of Seismic Survey Area 1.3 The proposed survey area is located within INEOS’s Petroleum Exploration and Development Licence areas (PEDLs) 299, 300, 304, 307, 308 and 309 which were awarded to INEOS in July 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Nether Langwith Parish Council
    NETHER LANGWITH PARISH COUNCIL MINUTES of the Meeting of the Parish Council held at the Village Hall on Thursday 8 October 2015 Present : Cllr M Middleton in the chair, Cllr W Bryan, Cllr L Malkan, Cllr G Staniforth, Cllr A Stevenson, Cllr R Stockton and Cllr J Ogle. 1. Apologies Apologies were received from Cllr K Dukes. 2. Minutes of the meeting held on 10 September 2015. The minutes of the Parish Council Meeting held on the 10 September 2015 were taken as read and accepted as a true record. The Chair signed them accordingly. 3. Matters Arising From the Minutes The roof of the village hall is still leaking into the toilet. Cllr Bryan will take a look at it. The problem with the Stagecoach service 82 has now eased. 4. Correspondence 4.1 BDC - notice of disposal of several electricity sub-station sites by Eon, including the one in Fairfield Close – noted.. 5. County Councillor’s Report Cllr Ogle reported that although the Site Allocations Plan had not been adopted, there was a new 3 year plan. 6. District Councillor’s Report. In the absence of Cllr Dukes there was no report. 7. Accounts for Payment. The Clerk reported that the following payments had been made or were due for payment by direct bank transfer or by cheque since the last meeting. It was resolved to approve the payments. mins-oct-15.doc / 1 Payee Reason Amount £ R Busby Aug/Sep Wages 87.32 Eon Electricity 16.01 Eon Gas 8.44 Acer Grounds Maint. Grass Cutting 2015 1976.00 B Woodcock Sal Sept 2015 201.12 HMRC Tax Jul/Sep 15 174.80 Mrs D Wakeling Wages Sept 15 65.00 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Dukeries History Trail Booklet
    Key Walk 1 P Parking P W Worksop Café Steetley C P P Meals Worksop W Toilets C Manor P M Museum Hardwick Penny Walk 2 Belph Green Walk 7 W C M P W Toll A60 ClumberC B6034 Bothamsall Creswell Crags M Welbeck P W Walk 6 P W M A614 CWalk 3 P Carburton C P Holbeck P P Norton Walk 4 P A616 Cuckney Thoresby P Hall Budby P W M WalkC 5 Sherwood Forest Warsop Country Park Ollerton The Dukeries History Trail SherwoodForestVisitor.com Sherwood Forest’s amazing north 1. Worksop Priory Worksop is well worth a visit as it has a highly accessible town centre with the Priory, Memorial Gardens, the Chesterfield Canal and the old streets of the Town Centre. Like a lot of small towns, if you look, there is still a lot of charm. Park next to the Priory and follow the Worksop Heritage Trail via Priorswell Road, Potter Street, Westgate, Lead Hill and the castle mound, Newcastle Avenue and Bridge Street. Sit in the Memorial Gardens for a while, before taking a stroll along the canal. Visit Mr Straw’s House(National Trust) BUT you must have pre-booked as so many people want to see it. Welbeck Abbey gates, Sparken Hill to the south of the town. The bridge over the canal with its ‘luxury duckhouse’, Priorswell Road . 2. Worksop Manor Lodge Dating from about 1590, the Lodge is a Grade 1 listed building. Five floors have survived – there were probably another two floors as well so would have been a very tall building for its time.
    [Show full text]
  • Catchment Management Plan the Environment Agency's Vision for the Rivers Idle and Torne Catchment Management Plan
    catchment management plan The Environment Agency's Vision for the Rivers Idle and Torne Catchment Management Plan he catchment of the Rivers Idle and Torne The key objectives of the plan are therefore to: T covers an area of 1 307 km2 within north Nottinghamshire and south Humberside and has • Establish a balance between the demands of a resident population of about 625,000 people. irrigation and abstraction and the needs of the environment. Man has impacted on the catchment since early times and the area has a rich industrial and • Ensure that the quality of minewater archaeological heritage. The heavily urbanised discharged to the rivers is of a and industrial headwaters contrast sharply with standard appropriate to the needs of the very flat, open and rural lower reaches nearer downstream users. to the confluences with the River Trent. Man's influence is also apparent here though where • Initiate and promote proposals for the drains have been cut and rivers re-routed and improvement of habitats for fisheries straightened to produce highly productive and conservation. agricultural areas. • Ensure that the standard of flood protection The catchment is predominantly rural with the is appropriate to the needs of the adjacent exception of the headwaters, as described above. land use, consistent with the vision. The River Idle and its tributaries flow through the heavily industrialised towns of Mansfield and The achievement of this vision is dependant on Worksop, then through the rolling forested areas the committed and enthusiastic cooperation of of Sherwood Forest and the Dukeries. The River others. Some objectives are common goals, while Torne rises on the edge of Doncaster and others may require a degree of compromise flows through the flat areas of low land, between differing demands on the resources of characterised by the Isle of Axholme, Thorne the catchment.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Contingency Plan
    Local Resilience Forum Flood Contingency Plan Version 2.0 March 2018 Flood Contingency Plan Contents Page Contents i Document control ii 1 Background information 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Causes of flooding 2 1.3 Legislation 3 1.4 The context of flooding in Derbyshire and Derby City 4 1.5 Overview of the flood risks in Derbyshire and Derby City 5 1.6 Aims and objectives 6 1.7 Other related plans 6 2 Roles and responsibilities of responding agencies 8 3 Plan activation and response 20 3.1 Activation of the flood response 20 3.2 Response of selected agencies to flood alerts and flood warnings 25 3.3 Mutual aid arrangements 27 3.4 Evacuation and shelter arrangements 28 3.5 Traffic management 29 3.6 Recovery arrangements 29 4 Command and co-ordination arrangements 34 4.1 Airwave inter-agency communication 34 Appendix A - Action sheets A1 Police A1 Fire & Rescue Service A5 Ambulance Service A7 Derbyshire County Council Emergency Planning Division A10 Appendix B - Contacts B1 Appendix C - Flood and weather warning services C1 Appendix D - Specialist resources D1 Appendix E - Working near water, health and safety advice and E1 information Appendix F - Environmental considerations F1 Glossary Lexicon Version 2.0 March 2018 i Flood Contingency Plan Document control This plan has been produced by Derbyshire County Council’s Emergency Planning Division on behalf of the Derbyshire Local Resilience Forum. The plan is subject to periodic review; however partners should inform the author of any material changes within their respective organisations which may require the issue of an interim amendment.
    [Show full text]
  • Does the Heritage of the Welbeck Estate Include a King Killed at Cuckney? COMMUNITY BOOK MARCH 2016 Contents Contents
    Does The Heritage Of The Welbeck Estate Include A King Killed At Cuckney? COMMUNITY BOOK MARCH 2016 Contents Contents Foreword 4 Project Scope 5 Pictures From The Project 6-7 Why I’m Excited By This Project 8-9 Community Day 1 10-13 Topography And Graveyard Survey 14-15 Basic Principles Of Ground Penetrating Radar And Magnetometry 16-17 Volunteer’s View 18-20 Get Social Networking 21 A Picture Paints A Thousand Words 22-25 Church History And Our Ancestors 26-30 Read All About It 31 The Battle Of Hatfield 32-39 Community Fieldwork Diary and Follow Ups 40-47 Community Workshop Overview 48-51 Funding Quest 52-55 Community Days 2 And 3 56-61 Conclusion 62 Suggested Reading 63 Copyright © 2016 Battle of Hatfield Investigation Society By Paul Jameson PlaNNINg OUr eveNTs This initially involved a 4 hour meeting with Mercian where we looked at all workshops required, who would run them and when; then largely involved Project booking various slots at Cuckney Village Hall with the kind assistance of Judith Reynolds from the ForewordThe Battle of Hatfield In those pre funded days (well.. A questionnaire was hand Village Hall Committee and multiple hall unlockings Investigation Society (“BOHIS”) two years !) we worked closely delivered to each of approx. 180 from warden Sheila Worthington. was formed in March 2013 with Andy Gaunt, Sean Crossley houses in the 3 local villages of Scope by Joseph Waterfall and Paul & David Budge from our Cuckney, Norton and Holbeck. This Heritage Lottery funded Community book As we needed a base for daily Fieldwork operations Jameson to examine whether archaeological partners, Mercian celebrates the people involved and the discoveries the same logistical process was involved.
    [Show full text]
  • Clumber Park and Lake a Stroll in the Heart of Sherwood Forest
    Clumber Park and Lake A stroll in the heart of Sherwood Forest The Basics Six miles (9.5 kilometres). This vast area of forest and parkland is the Dukeries, formerly the ducal estates of Welbeck, Thoresby and Clumber. All three have ‘fallen from their Graces’ but Clumber lives on as the regional H.Q. of the National Trust, with the area taking on a new role as a popular country park. This longer walk encompasses many less frequented parts of the parkland, but includes part of the delightful lake-side track and the self-service cafeteria - of course. It’s mixed tarmac and footpaths. Before you go Look in Google for information on Clumber Park, Hardwick village and the Duke of New- castle. Binoculars are worth taking. Click on https://youtu.be/-Ez07DhwIo0 to watch a short video. How to Get There From Nottingham, take the A614 to the Ollerton roundabout, second left A616 through Budby, then right on the B6034 to Worksop. About 1 mile south of the A57, take the minor road on the right, signed to Clumber Park, to Tru- man’s Lodge, a secondary entrance to the Park. Just before the Lodge, bear left and continue for .4 of a mile, (.6 km) parking at a small lay- by on your left at the first track crossing-point. Go left here at Truman’s Lodge Map Ref. for the parking spot is SK611 761. Lay-by on left From Worksop and other towns north, take the B6034 to the minor road 1 mile south of the A57, then as above.
    [Show full text]
  • Bassetlaw Water Cycle Study Scoping Study
    Bassetlaw District Council Bassetlaw Water Cycle Study Scoping Study Scoping Report July 2009 Prepared for: Bassetlaw District Council Bassetlaw Water Cycle Study- Scoping Study Revision Schedule Bassetlaw Water Cycle Study Scoping Report July 2009 Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 01 April 2009 Draft Scoping Gemma Costin Andrew Woodliffe Damon O'Brien Report Assistant Flood Risk Senior Flood Risk Technical Director Specialist Specialist Helen Burton Assistant Flood Risk Specialist 02 May 2009 Final Scoping Gemma Costin Andrew Woodliffe Damon O’Brien Report Assistant Flood Risk Senior Flood Risk Technical Director Specialist Specialist 03 July 2009 Final Scoping Gemma Costin Neil Mackenzie Jon Robinson Report Assistant Flood Risk Senior Water Specialist Associate Director Specialist Scott Wilson Mansfield i-Centre Hamilton Way Mansfield This document has been prepared in accordance with the scope of Scott Wilson's Nottinghamshire appointment with its client and is subject to the terms of that appointment. It is addressed to and for the sole and confidential use and reliance of Scott Wilson's client. Scott Wilson NG18 5BR accepts no liability for any use of this document other than by its client and only for the purposes for which it was prepared and provided. No person other than the client may copy (in whole or in part) use or rely on the contents of this document, without the prior Tel 01623 600660 written permi ssion of the Company Secretary of Scott Wilson Ltd. Any advice, opinions, or recommendations within this document should be read and relied upon only in the Fax 01623 600661 context of the document as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Nottinghamshire Level 1 Minerals SFRA Update
    Nottinghamshire Level 1 Minerals SFRA Update Final Report July 2015 47071849 UNITED KINGDOM & IRELAND Prepared for: Nottinghamshire Level 1 Minerals SFRA REVISION SCHEDULE Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 1 January Draft report for client Ed Byers Jo Somerton Andrew Woodliffe 2015 comment Flood Risk Consultant Senior Flood Risk Associate Director Consultant Penelope Pickerin Flood Risk Consultant 2 July Final Report Ed Byers Jo Somerton Carl Pelling 2015 Flood Risk Consultant Senior Flood Risk Associate Director Consultant URS Infrastructure and Environment Ltd Royal Court, Basil Close, Chesterfield, S41 7SL, United Kingdom. Phone: +44 (1246) 209221 Fax: +44 (1246) 209229 FINAL REPORT 47071849 July 2015 i Nottinghamshire Level 1 Minerals SFRA Limitations AECOM and URS have now joined together as one company, and will be known as AECOM moving forward. Whilst the brand is AECOM and operate as one company, contracting entities (all of which are now wholly owned by AECOM) and lines of communication currently remain the same unless specifically agreed or communicated otherwise. URS Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“URS”) has prepared this Report for the sole use of Nottinghamshire County Council (“Client”) in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed (Proposal Number: 47065807, dated 21st August 2014). No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by URS. This Report is confidential and may not be disclosed by the Client nor relied upon by any other party without the prior and express written agreement of URS. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report are based upon information provided by others and upon the assumption that all relevant information has been provided by those parties from whom it has been requested and that such information is accurate.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Neighbourhood Plan
    CNHW NEIGHBOURHOOD CNHW Neighbourhood Plan PLAN REVIEW Review Pre Submission Draft PRESUBMISSION 2021 - 2037 DRAFT Neighbourhood Plan for the Parishes of Cuckney & Norton, Holbeck & Welbeck 23 March 2021 CNHW Review Neighbourhood Plan | Introduction 2 Table of Contents Welcome! ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 6 3 Local Context ................................................................................................................................. 8 4 Why do we need to Review the CNHW Neighbourhood Plan? ................................................. 14 5 Consultation ................................................................................................................................. 19 6 Community Vision ........................................................................................................................ 20 7 Community Objectives ................................................................................................................ 20 8 Engaging with the Community: a Key Principle ......................................................................... 21 9 Sustainable Development and the Development Boundary .................................................... 22 10 Infill Development ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chesterfield, Bolsover and North East Derbyshire SFRA Strategic Flood Risk Assessment
    Chesterfield, Bolsover and North East Derbyshire SFRA Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Chesterfield Borough Council, Bolsover District Council and NE Derbyshire District Council March 2009 Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ 8 1 .......... Introduction ................................................................................................................... 16 1.1 The need for a SFRA .......................................................................................... 16 1.2 SFRA Objectives ................................................................................................. 17 1.3 Planning Policy ................................................................................................... 17 1.4 Methodology ....................................................................................................... 24 1.5 The Study Area ................................................................................................... 24 2 .......... Flood Risk ...................................................................................................................... 28 2.1 Responsibilities ................................................................................................... 28 2.2 Planning Policy Statement 25 ............................................................................. 31 2.3 Flood Mapping ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Nottinghamshire Baptists: Polity
    The Nottinghamshire Baptists POLITY Denominational Organisation N THE seventeenth century, when the Baptists emerged, the main I ecclesiastical systems represented in Britain were Episcopalianism, organised on a parish and diocesan basis, Presbyterianism with its presbyteries, synods and its General Assembly, and Separatism, em­ phasising the independence of the local Christian community, gathered out of the population as a whole. Baptists would, of course, be classed as Separatists, though the General Baptists show signs of a greater degree of central organisation than the Particular Baptists. The Particular Baptists formed local "associations" at quite an early date. There was a Midland Particular Baptist Association in 1655 and the Northamptonshire Association, to which the Nottingham­ shire churches belonged until 1835, was formed in 1764. In 1835 the Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire Association was formed and it was extended in 1860 to include Lincolnshire. The Association, covering three counties, remained in existence until the General Baptists and Particular Baptists united in 1891 and the East Midland Baptist Association was formed. The General Baptists of the Old Connexion went further than the Particular Baptists in their denominational organisation, having a General A,ssembly, whose minutes begin in 1654, which exercised a degree of jurisdiction over local churches. In 16961 it claimed that its decisions were binding on local churches, though in 1711 it modi­ fied this to the extent of deciding not to legislate on its own initiative but only to decide appeals. In 1744 it ordered that the local associa­ tions should be consulted before an appeal was made to the Assembly. In their recognition of the office of" messenger ", the Old Connexion General Baptists also displayed their closer denominational organisa­ tion.
    [Show full text]