DOCSLIB.ORG

6.9.2017 A8-0268/1 Amendment 1 Luis De Grandes Pascual, Javier

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

6.9.2017 A8-0268/1 Amendment 1 Luis de Grandes Pascual, Javier Nart, Lars Adaktusson, Michèle Alliot-Marie, Pilar Ayuso, Ivo Belet, Andrea Bocskor, Reimer Böge, Franc Bogovič, Michał Boni, Elmar Brok, Daniel Buda, Cristian-Silviu Buşoi, Jerzy Buzek, David Casa, Daniel Caspary, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Lorenzo Cesa, Deirdre Clune, Birgit Collin-Langen, Pál Csáky, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Herbert Dorfmann, Frank Engel, Norbert Erdős, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, José Inácio Faria, Markus Ferber, Santiago Fisas Ayxelà, Christofer Fjellner, Michael Gahler, Francesc Gambús, Elisabetta Gardini, Jens Gieseke, Esteban González Pons, Andrzej Grzyb, Brian Hayes, Esther Herranz García, Gunnar Hökmark, Danuta Jazłowiecka, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Sandra Kalniete, Tunne Kelam, Seán Kelly, Eduard Kukan, Verónica Lope Fontagné, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Mairead McGuinness, Ramona Nicole Mănescu, Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon, Artis Pabriks, Alojz Peterle, Marijana Petir, Julia Pitera, Stanislav Polčák, Cristian Dan Preda, Viviane Reding, Sofia Ribeiro, Fernando Ruas, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Csaba Sógor, Ivan Štefanec, Dubravka Šuica, Pavel Svoboda, László Tőkés, Vladimir Urutchev, Ramón Luis Valcárcel Siso, Elissavet Vozemberg-Vrionidi, Jarosław Wałęsa, Bogdan Brunon Wenta, Hermann Winkler, Iuliu Winkler, Anna Záborská, Željana Zovko, Milan Zver, Dennis Radtke, Ruža Tomašić, Marek Jurek, Jana Žitňanská, Ryszard Antoni Legutko, Bernd Kölmel, Amjad Bashir, Joachim Starbatty, Ashley Fox, Mark Demesmaeker, Ulrike Trebesius, Geoffrey Van Orden, Charles Tannock, Petras Auštrevičius, Beatriz Becerra Basterrechea, Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Enrique Calvet Chambon, Dita Charanzová, Fredrick Federley, María Teresa Giménez Barbat, Charles Goerens, Petr Ježek, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Patricia Lalonde, António Marinho e Pinto, Gesine Meissner, Norica Nicolai, Urmas Paet, Carolina Punset, Jozo Radoš, Frédérique Ries, Marietje Schaake, Hannu Takkula, Pavel Telička, Ivo Vajgl, Paavo Väyrynen, Renate Weber, Hilde Vautmans, Arne Gericke Report A8-0268/2017 Javi López EU political relations with Latin America 2017/2027(INI) Motion for a resolution Paragraph 59 Motion for a resolution Amendment 59. Reiterates its support for the peace 59. Reiterates its support for the peace process in Colombia, which is decisive for process in Colombia, which is decisive for the future of Colombians and for the future of Colombians and for stabilisation in the region of which this stabilisation in the region of which this country is a part, and undertakes to support country is a part, and undertakes to support the Colombian Government in its the Colombian Government in its implementation; stresses, in this regard, the implementation; stresses, in this regard, the importance of involving the whole of importance of involving the whole of AM\1133602EN.docx PE605.634v01-00 EN United in diversity EN Colombian society, in particular victims Colombian society, in particular victims and civil society organisations, as well as and civil society organisations, as well as forcibly displaced people, and of leaders of forcibly displaced people, and of leaders of the government guaranteeing the safety and the government guaranteeing the safety and protection of human rights activists and protection of human rights activists and community leaders; urges the EU and its community leaders; urges the EU and its Member States to continue their political Member States to continue their political and financial support, including through and financial support, including through the DCI Regulation, in particular Article the DCI Regulation, in particular Article 5(2) thereof, and the EU Trust Fund for 5(2) thereof, and the EU Trust Fund for Colombia, and supports the role of the Colombia, and supports the role of the VP/HR’s Special Envoy for Colombia; VP/HR’s Special Envoy for Colombia; express its wish that the National express its wish that the National Liberation Army would also commit to the Liberation Army would also commit to the ongoing peace process; ongoing peace process; welcomes the fact that, under UN supervision, the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) have completed the handover of individual weapons; supports the new mission established by the UN Security Council in order to help FARC members reintegrate into society; Or. en AM\1133602EN.docx PE605.634v01-00 EN United in diversity EN 6.9.2017 A8-0268/2 Amendment 2 Luis de Grandes Pascual, Javier Nart, Lars Adaktusson, Michèle Alliot-Marie, Pilar Ayuso, Ivo Belet, Andrea Bocskor, Reimer Böge, Franc Bogovič, Michał Boni, Elmar Brok, Daniel Buda, Cristian-Silviu Buşoi, Jerzy Buzek, David Casa, Daniel Caspary, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Lorenzo Cesa, Deirdre Clune, Birgit Collin-Langen, Pál Csáky, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Herbert Dorfmann, Frank Engel, Norbert Erdős, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, José Inácio Faria, Markus Ferber, Santiago Fisas Ayxelà, Christofer Fjellner, Michael Gahler, Francesc Gambús, Elisabetta Gardini, Jens Gieseke, Esteban González Pons, Andrzej Grzyb, Brian Hayes, Esther Herranz García, Gunnar Hökmark, Danuta Jazłowiecka, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Sandra Kalniete, Tunne Kelam, Seán Kelly, Eduard Kukan, Verónica Lope Fontagné, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Mairead McGuinness, Ramona Nicole Mănescu, Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon, Artis Pabriks, Alojz Peterle, Marijana Petir, Julia Pitera, Stanislav Polčák, Cristian Dan Preda, Viviane Reding, Sofia Ribeiro, Fernando Ruas, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Csaba Sógor, Ivan Štefanec, Dubravka Šuica, Pavel Svoboda, László Tőkés, Vladimir Urutchev, Ramón Luis Valcárcel Siso, Elissavet Vozemberg-Vrionidi, Jarosław Wałęsa, Bogdan Brunon Wenta, Hermann Winkler, Iuliu Winkler, Anna Záborská, Željana Zovko, Milan Zver, Dennis Radtke, Ruža Tomašić, Marek Jurek, Jana Žitňanská, Ryszard Antoni Legutko, Bernd Kölmel, Amjad Bashir, Joachim Starbatty, Ashley Fox, Mark Demesmaeker, Ulrike Trebesius, Geoffrey Van Orden, Charles Tannock, Petras Auštrevičius, Beatriz Becerra Basterrechea, Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Enrique Calvet Chambon, Dita Charanzová, Fredrick Federley, María Teresa Giménez Barbat, Charles Goerens, Petr Ježek, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Patricia Lalonde, Gesine Meissner, Louis Michel, Norica Nicolai, Urmas Paet, Maite Pagazaurtundúa Ruiz, Carolina Punset, Jozo Radoš, Frédérique Ries, Marietje Schaake, Hannu Takkula, Pavel Telička, Paavo Väyrynen, Renate Weber, Hilde Vautmans, Arne Gericke Report A8-0268/2017 Javi López EU political relations with Latin America 2017/2027(INI) Motion for a resolution Paragraph 60 Motion for a resolution Amendment 60. Expresses its grave concern at the 60. Expresses its grave concern at the seriously deteriorating situation as regards seriously deteriorating situation as regards democracy, human rights and the socio- democracy, human rights and the socio- economic situation in Venezuela, in a economic situation in Venezuela, in a climate of growing political and social climate of growing political and social instability; calls on the Venezuelan instability; calls on the Venezuelan Government to safeguard the separation Government to safeguard the separation AM\1133602EN.docx PE605.634v01-00 EN United in diversity EN and independence of branches of and independence of branches of government and to restore full government and to restore full constitutional authority to the National constitutional authority to the National Assembly; calls furthermore on the Assembly; calls furthermore on the Venezuelan Government to ensure the Venezuelan Government to ensure the immediate and unconditional release of all immediate and unconditional release of all political prisoners and to present as soon as political prisoners and to present as soon as possible an electoral calendar that will possible an electoral calendar that will allow free and transparent electoral allow free and transparent electoral processes to take place; calls on the processes to take place; calls on the international community, the regional international community, the regional actors and the VP/HR to promote and actors and the VP/HR to promote and support a broad national agreement as the support a broad national agreement as the only possible solution; asks the VP/HR to only possible solution; asks the VP/HR to actively explore other measures to actively explore other measures to constructively promote the political constructively promote the political stabilisation of the country; rejects, in this stabilisation of the country; rejects, in this context, any attempt to divert its context, any attempt to divert its constitutionally recognised powers to any constitutionally recognised powers to any other body; other body; strongly condemns the elections to a Constituent Assembly of 30 July 2017 as being in breach of the separation of powers and respect for citizens’ rights to freely express their political opinion through democratically elected and legitimate institutions; recalls that the European Parliament, along with many other international actors, does not recognise those elections or any actions and decisions taken by the newly established Assembly due to its lack of legitimacy, and regrets the violent circumstances resulting in many people being killed and injured; expresses its grave concerns about the illegal prosecution and repression of democratically elected members of the National Assembly; rejects the dismissal of the Prosecutor General Luisa Ortega Diaz and her political persecution, as well as all of the members of the Supreme Court appointed by the legitimate National Assembly of Venezuela; fully supports the ICC investigations into the extensive crimes and acts of repression perpetrated by the Venezuelan regime, and calls for the EU to play an active role in this regard; calls on the VP/HR and the AM\1133602EN.docx PE605.634v01-00 EN United in diversity EN European Council to give consideration to the freezing of assets, as well as placing restrictions on access to EU territory for all those involved in the serious violations of human rights in Venezuela, including the members of the non-recognised Constituent Assembly; Or. en AM\1133602EN.docx PE605.634v01-00 EN United in diversity EN .
Recommended publications
  • 0420 2 MINUTES Meeting of 20 April 2015, 16.45-18.30

    0420 2 MINUTES Meeting of 20 April 2015, 16.45-18.30

    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2014 - 2019 Committee on Budgets Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs CJ16_PV(2015)0420_2 MINUTES Meeting of 20 April 2015, 16.45-18.30 BRUSSELS The meeting opened at 17.10 on Monday, 20 April 2015, with Jean Arthuis (Chairman of the BUDG committee) and Roberto Gualtieri (Chairman of the ECON Committee) co-chairing. 1. Adoption of agenda Decision: The draft agenda was adopted in the form shown in these minutes. 2. Approval of minutes of meeting of: 26 March 2015 PV – PE552.106v01-00 Decision: The minutes were approved. 3. European Fund for Strategic Investments CJ16/8/02939 ***I 2015/0009(COD) COM(2015)0010 – C8-0007/2015 Rapporteurs José Manuel Fernandes (PPE) RR – PE551.765v03-00 Udo Bullmann (S&D) AM – PE551.965v02-00 AM – PE552.028v02-00 AM – PE552.025v02-00 AM – PE552.027v02-00 AM – PE552.026v02-00 Responsible: BUDG, ECON* Adoption of single draft report (Rule 55) Deadline for tabling amendments: 19 March 2015, 12.00 Speakers: Jean Arthuis, Marisa Matias, Roberto Gualtieri, Sylvie Goulard, Bernd Lucke, Gérard Deprez, Udo Bullmann, Liadh Ní Riada, Nils Torvalds, PV\1058717EN.doc PE554.945v01-00 EN United in diversity EN José Manuel Fernandes Decision on the legislative Adopted: 69 votes to 13, with 6 abstentions. resolution: Decision on the text as Adopted: 66 votes to 13, with 9 abstentions amended: Decision to enter negotiations Adopted: 71 votes to 6, with 11 abstentions. with the Council (rule 73): 4. Any other business The meeting finished at 18:05. PE554.945v01-00 2/8 PV\1058717EN.doc EN ПРИСЪСТВЕН
  • En En Amendments

    En En Amendments

    European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Employment and Social Affairs 2016/2095(INI) 18.10.2016 AMENDMENTS 1 - 385 Draft report Maria João Rodrigues (PE589.146v02-00) A European Pillar of Social Rights (2016/2095(INI)) AM\1107532EN.docx PE592.173v01-00 EN United in diversity EN AM_Com_NonLegReport PE592.173v01-00 2/182 AM\1107532EN.docx EN Amendment 1 Joëlle Mélin, Mara Bizzotto, Dominique Martin Motion for a resolution Heading 1 Motion for a resolution Amendment On A European Pillar of Social Rights deleted Or. fr Amendment 2 Joëlle Mélin, Mara Bizzotto, Dominique Martin Motion for a resolution Citation 1 Motion for a resolution Amendment – having regard to the Treaty on deleted European Union, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Or. fr Amendment 3 Morten Løkkegaard, Martina Dlabajová, Alexander Graf Lambsdorff, Enrique Calvet Chambon, Ulrike Müller Motion for a resolution Citation 1 Motion for a resolution Amendment – having regard to the Treaty on – having regard to the Treaty on European Union, the Treaty on the European Union, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the Functioning of the European Union, in Charter of Fundamental Rights of the particular article 153 laying out the AM\1107532EN.docx 3/182 PE592.173v01-00 EN European Union, competences of the EU and member states with regards to social policies and labour markets, article 154 and 155 on the role of the social partners; and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Or. en Amendment 4 Maria João Rodrigues, Sergio Gutiérrez Prieto, Vilija Blinkevičiūtė, Brando Benifei, Agnes Jongerius, Emilian Pavel, Maria Arena, Joachim Schuster, Georgi Pirinski, Siôn Simon Motion for a resolution Citation 1 a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment – having regard to the European Convention on Human Rights, Or.
  • EU Firearms Proposal Committee Members

    EU Firearms Proposal Committee Members

    Internal Market and Consumer Protection Committee http://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/imco/home.html NB - You can “Click” on the MEP’s name to be taken to their profile page on the EU Website which contains more information such as Facebook pages and Twitter feeds. PLEASE - ONLY USE THIS LIST TO EMAIL POLITE AND SENSIBLE COMMENTS TO THESE MEP’S DO NOT USE IT TO SEND SPAM OR DEROGATORY OR RUDE EMAILS - WE WANT TO KEEP OUR FIREARMS, NOT ANNOY THE PEOPLE WITH THE POWER TO HELP US. Photo Name/Position/Country Email Address Vicky FORD [email protected] Chair European Conservatives and Reformists Group United Kingdom Anna Maria CORAZZA BILDT [email protected] Vice-Chair Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Sweden Robert ROCHEFORT [email protected] Vice-Chair Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe France Catherine STIHLER [email protected] Vice-Chair Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament United Kingdom Nicola DANTI [email protected] Vice-Chair Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Italy Dita CHARANZOVÁ [email protected] Member Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Czech Republic Carlos COELHO [email protected] Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Portugal Sergio Gaetano COFFERATI [email protected] Member Group
  • Report on an Aviation Strategy for Europe

    Report on an Aviation Strategy for Europe

    European Parliament 2014-2019 Plenary sitting A8-0021/2017 2.2.2017 REPORT on an Aviation Strategy for Europe (2016/2062(INI)) Committee on Transport and Tourism Rapporteur: Pavel Telička Rapporteur for the opinion (*): Ole Christensen, Committee on Employment and Social Affairs (*) Associated committee – Rule 54 of the Rules of Procedure RR\1116370EN.docx PE589.131v02-00 EN United in diversity EN PR_INI PE589.131v02-00 2/40 RR\1116370EN.docx EN CONTENTS Page MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION ............................................ 4 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT ............................................................................................ 16 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS (*) ...... 24 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE ENVIRONMENT, PUBLIC HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY ....................................................................................................................... 31 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE INTERNAL MARKET AND CONSUMER PROTECTION ......................................................................................................................... 35 RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE ........................................... 40 (*) Associated committee – Rule 54 of the Rules of Procedure RR\1116370EN.docx 3/40 PE589.131v02-00 EN MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION on an Aviation Strategy for Europe (2016/2062(INI)) The European Parliament, – having regard to the Commission communication of 7 December 2015 entitled ‘An Aviation Strategy for Europe’
  • Has the Afd Changed German Politics?

    Has the Afd Changed German Politics?

    2/2017 2/2017 Has the AfD changed German politics? Klaus Ziemer Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw Abstract The entry of the AfD to the Bundestag marks a new stage in German politics. This article traces the origins of this right-wing populist party against the background of extreme right- wing parties in post-war Germany. It analyses the main precepts of the party’s programme and its activity in parliaments on the regional (Länder) level. A look at where AfD-voters are coming from reveals a long-term trend of a weakening alignment between voters and parties and a growing fragmentation of the German party system. Key words AfD, origins, party programme, AfD electorate, parliamentary activity he political scene in Germany is in a state of flux. The elections Tto the Bundestag in 2017 have, in a most remarkable way, con- tinued the long-term change of the German party system. The entry of the right-wing Alternative für Deutschland (Alternative for Germany, AfD) reflects the changes in the political cleavages in Germany after the immigration crisis of 2015 and has brought about the end of unam- biguous coalition alternatives on the federal level. The loss of votes by most of the established parties (the SPD got its worst result in Bundestag elections ever) and the number of parliamentary groups: six, which the Bundestag had last seen in 1953 – has made it clear that the Federal Republic is entering a new stage in its history. This was confirmed by the fact that the formation of a new government took half a year – an un- precedented long period of time in the history of the Federal Republic.
  • Afd) a New Actor in the German Party System

    Afd) a New Actor in the German Party System

    INTERNATIONAL POLICY ANALYSIS Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) A New Actor in the German Party System MARCEL LEWANDOWSKY March 2014 The Alternative für Deutschland (AfD – Alternative for Germany) is a new party in the conservative/economic liberal spectrum of the German party system. At present it is a broad church encompassing various political currents, including classic ordo-liberals, as well as euro-sceptics, conservatives and right-wingers of different stripes. The AfD has not yet defined its political platform, which is still shaped by periodic flare-ups of different groups positioning themselves within the party or by individual members. The AfD’s positions are mainly critical of Europe and the European Union. It advo- cates winding up the euro area, restoration of national currencies or small currency unions and renationalisation of decision-making processes in the EU. When it comes to values it represents conservative positions. As things stand at the moment, given its rudimentary political programme, the AfD is not a straightforward right-wing populist party in the traditional sense. The populist tag stems largely from the party’s campaigning, in which it poses as the mouthpiece of »the people« and of the »silent majority«. With regard to its main topics, the AfD functions as a centre-right protest party. At the last Bundestag election in 2013 it won voters from various political camps. First studies show that although its sympathisers regard themselves as occupying the political centre, they represent very conservative positions on social and integra- tion-policy issues. Marcel Lewandowsky | ALternativE füR DEutschland (AfD) Content 1. Origins and Development.
  • Nine Lives of Neoliberalism

    Nine Lives of Neoliberalism

    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Plehwe, Dieter (Ed.); Slobodian, Quinn (Ed.); Mirowski, Philip (Ed.) Book — Published Version Nine Lives of Neoliberalism Provided in Cooperation with: WZB Berlin Social Science Center Suggested Citation: Plehwe, Dieter (Ed.); Slobodian, Quinn (Ed.); Mirowski, Philip (Ed.) (2020) : Nine Lives of Neoliberalism, ISBN 978-1-78873-255-0, Verso, London, New York, NY, https://www.versobooks.com/books/3075-nine-lives-of-neoliberalism This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/215796 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative
  • En En Opinion

    En En Opinion

    European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs 2018/2094(INI) 22.11.2018 OPINION of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs for the Committee on Constitutional Affairs on the state of the debate on the Future of Europe (2018/2094(INI)) Rapporteur for opinion (*): Ivana Maletić (*) Associated committee – Rule 54 of the Rules of Procedure AD\1169540EN.docx PE626.685v02-00 EN United in diversity EN PA_NonLeg PE626.685v02-00 2/6 AD\1169540EN.docx EN SUGGESTIONS The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs calls on the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions into its motion for a resolution: 1. Notes the views expressed during plenary debates on the ‘Future of Europe’; is of the view that the future EU budget should promote European added value in terms of socio- economic impact, support the modernisation of EU policies, ensure finances for new challenges, continue contributing towards economic and social convergence and cohesion between and inside the Member States so as to enhance European solidarity, stability, equality and smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, including in light of the EU’s commitments regarding the Paris Agreement, secure the respect and promotion of fundamental values as stated in Articles 2 and 3 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and be endowed with new own resources, taking into account the work of the High Level Group on Own Resources; 2. Underlines the importance of commitment to the process of completing the Banking Union and the need to ensure openness and equal treatment of all Member States participating in the Banking Union; recalls that the completion of the Banking Union, including a European Deposit Insurance Scheme and a fiscal backstop for the Single Resolution Fund, must continue, as must measures to achieve risk reduction; 3.
  • Download Pdf Version

    Download Pdf Version

    AUTUMN 2015 AUTUMN THAT SINKING FEELING Stefan Kawalec THE EURO AS A THREAT TO EUROPEAN INTEGRATION Brigitte Granville THE IMF AND THE EUROZONE: FIREMAN OR ARSONIST RECOVERY Jean-Jacques Rosa Alberto Bagnai GIVING GREECE “AUSTERIANS” VS. A CHANCE “APPEALIANS” Joachim Starbatty Hans-Olaf Henkel HAS GERMANY THE EURO-RESCUE BENEFITED FROM POLICY AND THE EURO? BREXIT THE EURO HAS PROFOUNDLY CHANGED Tomasz Poreba is a Member of the European Parliament and President of New Direction – The Foundation for European Reform. EUROPE he introduction of the euro was supposed to strengthen the process of European integration. Unfortunately, although the euro has become one of the most visible symbols of the EU, the T number of harmful consequences is growing. The euro has distorted the way in which the economies of Spain, Portugal, Italy and Greece function. Moreover, the countries of southern Europe, as members of a currency union cannot use currency devaluation, the most powerful instrument for coping with a serious economic depression. Economic history teaches us that having your own currency is essential for a country facing a severe economic crisis, but appropriate reforms must follow devaluation to make a recovery sustainable. There can be little doubt that the euro has profoundly changed Europe. A deeper reflection on the nature and consequences of the monetary union in Europe is unavoidable. Today, more than ever before, we can see that the euro has still not improved the economic situation in the European Union. It was clearly a political rather than an economic project. The single currency, instead of accelerating Europe’s prosperity, has deepened divisions between EU member states.
  • Downloads/Von Der Gesellschaftssteuerung Zur Sozialen Kontrolle.Pdf 704 the Conference Was Max Weber Und Die Soziologie Heute: Verhandlungen Des 15

    Downloads/Von Der Gesellschaftssteuerung Zur Sozialen Kontrolle.Pdf 704 the Conference Was Max Weber Und Die Soziologie Heute: Verhandlungen Des 15

    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Political Deficits: The Dawn of Neoliberal Rationality and the Eclipse of Critical Theory Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9p0574bc Author Callison, William Andrew Publication Date 2019 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Political Deficits: The Dawn of Neoliberal Rationality and the Eclipse of Critical Theory By William Andrew Callison A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science and the Designated Emphasis in Critical Theory in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Wendy Brown, Chair Professor Pheng Cheah Professor Kinch Hoekstra Professor Martin Jay Professor Hans Sluga Professor Shannon C. Stimson Summer 2019 Political Deficits: The Dawn of Neoliberal Rationality and the Eclipse of Critical Theory Copyright © 2019 William Andrew Callison All rights reserved. Abstract Political Deficits: The Dawn of Neoliberal Rationality and the Eclipse of Critical Theory By William Andrew Callison Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science and the Designated Emphasis in Critical Theory University of California, Berkeley Professor Wendy Brown, Chair This dissertation examines the changing relationship between social science, economic governance, and political imagination over the past century. It specifically focuses on neoliberal, ordoliberal and neo-Marxist visions of politics and rationality from the interwar period to the recent Eurocrisis. Beginning with the Methodenstreit (or “methodological dispute”) between Gustav von Schmoller and Carl Menger and the subsequent “socialist calculation debate” about markets and planning, the dissertation charts the political and epistemological formation of the Austrian School (e.g., Ludwig von Mises, Friedrich A.
  • 1 03 Sept. 2014 How the Sakharov Prize 2014 Is Awarded Background Briefing in the Next 10 Days, the Nominations of the Sakharov

    1 03 Sept. 2014 How the Sakharov Prize 2014 Is Awarded Background Briefing in the Next 10 Days, the Nominations of the Sakharov

    1 03 Sept. 2014 How the Sakharov Prize 2014 is awarded Background briefing In the next 10 days, the nominations of the Sakharov Prize for Human Rights will be decided by the European Parliament. The prize is awarded to “honour exceptional individuals who combat intolerance, fanaticism and oppression.”1 Previous winners include Nelson Mandela, Reporters without Borders and Anatoli Marchenko. If you believe that Azerbaijani human rights defenders – who are now in jail following years of work on behalf of the rights of others, and most recently on a list of political prisoners in Azerbaijan (on which they are now included) – then let the MEPs who vote on this know. Nominations for the Sakharov Prize can be made by: Political groups in the European Parliament. Or At least 40 MEPs. The deadline for nominations is Thursday 18 September at 12:00 in Strasbourg. NOTE: In order to decide on a nominee from their group some political groups have internal deadlines in the course of the next week. The next days are crucial. We focus here on four important political groups which might to support this nomination: The EPP Social Democrats Liberals Greens 1Source: The European Union website: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/aboutparliament/en/00f3dd2249/Sakharov-Prize-for-Freedom-of-Thought.html 2 Once the nominations are been made, the Foreign Affairs and Development committees vote on a shortlist of three finalists. This happens on either Monday 6th or Tuesday 7th October 2014. The members list for the foreign affairs committee can be found here: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/afet/members.html, while the development committee is here: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/deve/members.html#menuzone.
  • Juni 2014(48,4

    Juni 2014(48,4

    Bundesausschuss Obst und Gemüse Mitteilungen bog Nr. 06/2014 20. Juni 2014 I n h a l t : Seite Beratender Ausschuss Obst und Gemüse tagte in Brüssel 1 Europa hat gewählt 2 Agrarminister diskutieren über die Verfügbarkeit von 4 Pflanzenschutzmitteln für geringfügige Verwendungen Pflanzenschutzharmonisierung 5 Aktionsplan Obst und Gemüse zum Pflanzenschutz 6 Delegierte Verordnung (EU) Nr. 499/2014 der Kommission 7 vom 11. März 2014 in Bezug auf Obst und Gemüse Fruit Logistica 2015 vom 4. bis 6. Februar 2015 8 Bertram Fleischer wird neuer Generalsekretär des 8 Zentralverbandes Gartenbau ab Februar 2015 Herausgegeben vom Bundesausschuss Obst und Gemüse, Claire-Waldoff-Straße 7, 10117 Berlin, Telefon: 030 31904269, Telefax: 030 31904271, e-mail: [email protected] – Nachdruck mit Quellenangabe bog BERATENDER AUSSCHUSS OBST UND GEMÜSE TAGTE IN BRÜSSEL Am 3. Juni 2014 tagte in Brüssel der Beratende Ausschuss der Europäischen Kommission zu Obst und Gemüse. Wichtige Themenbereiche der Sitzung des Beratenden Ausschusses der EU-Kommission waren das Pflanzengesundheitspaket und die Reform der Gemeinsa- men Agrarpolitik einschließlich der Änderungen der Durchführungsverordnungen für den Bereich Obst und Gemüse. Zum Pflanzengesundheitspaket diskutierten die Mitglieder des Beratenden Ausschusses, insbesondere aber die Vertreter von COPA/COGECA im Bera- tenden Ausschuss mit der DG Sanco der Europäischen Kommission, über den Fortgang der Regelungen im Pflanzengesundheitspaket bei den Einfuhren. Die erste Runde im Europäi- schen Rat wird wohl noch vor der Sommerpause abgeschlossen werden können. Das Par- lament hatte in der letzten Amtsperiode noch die erste Runde abgeschlossen. Mit einem Trilog, also der Verständigung zwischen Rat und Parlament, ist voraussichtlich für Ende des Jahres 2014 zu rechnen.