How to Improve a Thematic Exhibit
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Certified Mail and Its First Day of Issue by Patrick Crosby a Stamp Collector Can Complete a Scott U.S
Certified Mail and Its First Day of Issue By Patrick Crosby A stamp collector can complete a Scott U.S. back-of-the-book category with just one stamp valued at 75¢ mint or used. I’m referring to the 1955 Certified Mail stamp (Scott # FA1) which helped the U.S. Post Office Department (P.O.D.) inaugurate Certified Mail service. This stamp and Certified Mail become much more interesting when on cover, like the featured postcard’s first day of issue usage. Postmaster General Arthur Summerfield called the new Certified Mail service a “change in the registered mail service,” reducing costs to patrons and speeding delivery on at least 25 million letters a year. Registered mail requires special bundling, recording of information, and security at every handling point. For 15¢ Certified Mail would offer proof of mailing and proof of receipt with no indemnity (insurance) or special security on first-class items that have no intrinsic value as opposed to the minimum 40¢ registry fee. A patron would pay for first-class postage and the Certified Mail fee, then he would receive a numbered receipt. The mailed item would be entered into the ordinary mail stream (unless airmail or special delivery) with a two-part Certified Mail label, one part adhered to the envelope. When delivered, the carrier or postal employee was to have the receipt portion signed by a recipient, then remove the receipt portion where rouletted and return it to the delivery post office for filing. If the patron had requested a return receipt (showing when, where, and to whom an item was delivered) it would have been noted on the mailed item and a fee of 7¢ would have been paid for in postage. -
DUTCH COUNTRY AUCTIONS the Stamp Center Presents PUBLIC AUCTION #334 Now in Our 42Nd Year
DUTCH COUNTRY AUCTIONS The Stamp Center Presents PUBLIC AUCTION #334 Now In Our 42nd Year #1051 #1418 #503 #986 Tuesday, May 18, 2021 – 10 am ET Wednesday, May 19, 2021 – 10 am ET Thursday, May 20, 2021 – 10 am ET 302-478-8740 www.dutchcountryauctions.com 4115 Concord Pike • Wilmington, DE 19803 48009 Dutch Country Auctions.pdf1 CONDITIONS OF SALE Bidding 1. The placing of a bid will constitute acceptance of the conditions of sale. 2. All bids are per lot as numbered in the catalog. The right is reserved to withdraw any lot or lots and to group two or more lots. 3. Lots are sold to the highest bidder at one advance over the second highest bid. The auctioneer shall regulate the bidding and in the event of any dispute the auctioneer’s decision shall be final. 4. The auctioneer shall not be liable for errors and omissions in executing instructions to bid. 5. Unlimited bids and bids believed not to be made in good faith will be respectfully declined. 6. Minimum bid on any lot is $50.00. 7. All lots will be sold at the price for which they are knocked down by the auctioneer, plus a commission of 15%. Payment of Purchases 8. Successful bidders will be notified of lots purchased and must remit before lots are delivered. Persons who are known to us may, at our option, have purchases forwarded for immediate payment. 9. Terms are immediate payment in U.S. funds on receipt of the invoice. Payment by credit card will be subject to a 2% service charge. -
§ 7. Franking
THE MEMBERS Ch. 7 § 7 For 10 other House committees, official business and to use foreign the House agreed to amendments currencies credited to the United authorizing no counterpart funds States (pursuant to H. Res. 368) for members of those commit- although the House Committee on tees.(8) However, denial of such Rules had previously disallowed authorization did not preclude a use of governmental funds for committee from requesting spe- overseas travel by members of the Committee on Education and cific authorization of the Com- Labor.(11) mittee on Rules for overseas trav- el funds for specific purposes.(9) § 6.9 Where members of a com- § 7. Franking mittee have no authority, under the committee’s inves- The franking privilege is the statutory right of Representatives tigatory resolution, to travel to send certain material through overseas or to use foreign the United States’ mails without currencies while on com- postage cost to themselves,(12) the mittee business, the House cost being paid from public reve- may grant such authority nues.(13) Members, along with when the Speaker appoints members of that committee 11. 109 CONG. REC. 1553, 88th Cong. 1st Sess., Jan. 31, 1963. See § 6.6, supra, as delegates to an inter- for further discussion. national conference. 12. For a statutory synopsis, see House On May 31, 1963, Speaker John Rules and Manual § 984 (1973). See W. McCormack, of Massachusetts, also ‘‘Law and Regulations Regard- appointed several delegates from ing Use of the Congressional Frank,’’ the Committee on Education and Subcommittee on Postal Service, Committee on Post Office and Civil Labor to attend the International Service, 92d Cong. -
How Early Post Office Policy Shaped Modern First Amendment Doctrine
Hastings Law Journal Volume 58 | Issue 4 Article 1 1-2007 The rT ansformation of Statutes into Constitutional Law: How Early Post Officeolic P y Shaped Modern First Amendment Doctrine Anuj C. Desai Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Anuj C. Desai, The Transformation of Statutes into Constitutional Law: How Early Post Officeo P licy Shaped Modern First Amendment Doctrine, 58 Hastings L.J. 671 (2007). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol58/iss4/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Articles The Transformation of Statutes into Constitutional Law: How Early Post Office Policy Shaped Modern First Amendment Doctrine ANUJ C. DESAI* INTRODUCTION One of the great urban legends on the Internet was "Bill 6o2P."' In the late 199OS it spread like wildfire, and it occasionally makes the rounds again like pleas from Nigerian officials seeking help with their Swiss bank accounts or the story of the $250 Neiman Marcus cookie recipe. The bill, supported by (no doubt soon-to-be-defeated) "Congressman Tony Schnell," would have imposed a five cent tax on each e-mail message. One would be hard put to imagine a more nefarious way for * Assistant Professor, University of Wisconsin Law School. Many people read all or large parts of this Article and provided helpful suggestions. -
THE DOUBLE-FRANKING PERIOD ALSACE-LORRAINE, 1871-1872 by Ruth and Gardner Brown
WHOLE NUMBER 199 (Vol. 41, No.1) January 1985 USPS #207700 THE DOUBLE-FRANKING PERIOD ALSACE-LORRAINE, 1871-1872 By Ruth and Gardner Brown Introduction Ruth and I began this survey in December 1983 and 1 wrote the art:de in November] 984 after her sudden death in July. I have included her narre as an author since she helped with the work. 1 have used the singular pro noun in this article because it is painful for me to do otherwise. After buying double-franking covers for over 30 years I recently made a collection (an exhibit) out of my accumulation. In anticipation of this ef fort, about 10 years ago, I joined the Societe Philatelique Alsace-Lorraine (SPAL). Their publications are to be measured not in the number of pages but by weight! Over the years I have received 11 pounds of documents, most of it is xeroxed but in 1983 they issued a nicely printed, up to date catalogue covering the period 1872-1924. Although it is for the time frame after the double-franking era, it is the only source known to me which solves the mys teries of the name changes of French towns to German. The ones which gave me the most trouble were French: Thionville, became German Dieden l!{\fen, and Massevaux became Masmunster. One of the imaginative things done by SPAL was to offel' reduced xerox copies of 40, sixteen-page frames, exhibited at Colmar in 1974. Many of these covered the double-franking period. Before mounting my collection I decided to review the SPAL literature to get a feeling for what is common and what is rare. -
Bibliography of the Cuban Postal Rocket Experiment Bibliografía Del Experimento Del Cohete Postal Cubano By/Por Ernesto Cuesta
Bibliography of the Cuban Postal Rocket Experiment Bibliografía del Experimento del Cohete Postal Cubano by/por Ernesto Cuesta <AF5511a24> Actividades Filatélicas "El Cohete Postal" "The Postal Rocket" AF, "CUPEX" Special Issue, Nov 1955, pp.71-72, ill., Span. & Eng. <AF6309> Actividades Filatélicas "Vigésimo Quinto Aniversario del Experimento del Cohete Postal" ("25th Anniversary of the Postal Mail Rocket") AF, Yr.XXVI, Nos.125-126, Sep-Oct 1964, Span. <ALME5901> Almeyda, Eduardo R. "El Cohete Postal en los Sellos de Correos" ("The Postal Rocket in Postage Stamps") BMI, Yr.3, No.1, Jan 1959, p.8, Span. <BELL5209> Bello Hernández, Ernesto "Un Aniversario Más del Cohete Postal Cubano" ("Another Anniversary of the Cuban Postal Rocket") BFC, Sep 1952 (date deduced from bulletin contents), p.3 (unnumbered), Span. A one page recount of the planning, preparation, and launching of the Cuban postal rocket. <CARRO5204> Carroll, Armand E. "Rocket Posts" JKAL, Apr-May-Jun 1952, pp.23-24, ill. <CP7210> The Cuban Philatelist (CPC) "El Cohete Postal" "The Postal Rocket" CP, Vol.II, No.2, October 1972, pp.12-13, ill., Span. & Eng. <DOBA4002b> Dobarganes, Ernesto L. "Cohete Postal" ("Postal Rocket") UFPI, Yr.I, Nos.8-9, 15 February 1940, p.7, Span. <ECHE0400> Echenagusía García, Carlos Catálogo de Emisiones y Cancelaciones dedicadas al Cohete Postal Cubano (Catalog of the Issue and Cancellations Commemorating the Cuban Postal Rocket) Madrid, Spain: 2004. Published by the author, 17 pp., ill. in color, Span. The catalog is divided in three sections: the first section covers the trial launches, the second section covers officially issued stamps and FDCs commemorating the actual launch of 15 October 1939, the third section includes covers and labels issued in subsequent years to commemorate anniversaries of the 15 October 1939 launch. -
Invalid Use of a Postal Card Stamp by Patrick Crosby What Was Bill Johnson Thinking? Perhaps He Wasn’T Thinking
Invalid Use of a Postal Card Stamp By Patrick Crosby What was Bill Johnson thinking? Perhaps he wasn’t thinking. He tried to mail a letter using a 1¢ cut-out from a postal card. Eventually he paid the proper 3¢ letter rate. A few clues that something was amiss would tip off a postal clerk in Rochester, NY. First off, a clerk would be aware of the color scheme being used on U.S. stamps—green equals a 1c stamp, the card rate, and violet equals a 3¢ stamp, the basic letter rate. So a lone green stamp on an envelope is a red flag. And then there is mutilation. Only the Postmaster General could determine the government postal card size. Any change in a postal card’s size is considered mutilation and “…renders the stamp impressed thereon valueless.” Bill had neatly cut around the stamp portion of the reply half of a message-reply card and glued it to the envelope. In effect, on February 4, 1941, he mailed a letter without postage. Underneath the later added 3¢ violet stamp is a “Due 3 cents.” marking. A straight-line “Feb 5-1941” shows up as a date control marking. Then Bill comes forward with the proper postage and “Postage subsequently paid by writer” is added. A parcel/general purpose dateless roller cancels the stamp. The letter is then on its way with a second Rochester, NY postmark. If there was a chance that a postal clerk could miss the above irregularities and went to send the letter at the card rate, the item was still taller (top to bottom) at 3¾” than the 3 9/16” allowed by postal regulations for cards at the time. -
Postal Stationery Collector
POSTAL STATIONERY COLLECTOR Volume 22 No 3: Issue No 87 August 2016 THE POSTAL STATIONERY SOCIETY OF AUSTRALIA The Postal Stationery Society of Australia has been established to encourage the collecting of postal stationery in Australia and New Zealand and to provide a forum for postal stationery collectors to maintain contact with other stationery collectors and to learn more about their hobby. The Society is not based in any particular city or state and plans to hold meetings at national and state level exhibitions. Subscription rate for 2016 has been set at $50 (Australia) and $70 (Overseas excluding New Zealand which is $60). For further information please contact the Convenor, Secretary or your State Coordinator. Membership enquiries should be addressed to the Secretary. OFFICE BEARERS: CONVENOR: Ian McMahon, PO Box 783, Civic Square ACT 2608 Email: [email protected] SECRETARY: Judy Kennett, PO Box 16, Ulmarra NSW 2462 Email: [email protected] TREASURER: John Crowsley, PO Box 2296, Keperra Qld 4054 Email: [email protected] STATE AND NEW ZEALAND COORDINATORS: ACT Ian McMahon, PO Box 783, Civic Square ACT 2608 Email: [email protected] NSW Bernie Doherty, PO Box 18, Waratah NSW 2298 Email: [email protected] NSW (Sydney area) David Collyer, PO Box 201, Gladesville NSW 1675 Email: [email protected] QLD Joan Orr, 7 Mizzen St, Manly West Qld 4179 Email: [email protected] SA Martin Walker, PO Box 247, Torrensville Plaza SA 5031 Email: [email protected] TAS Malcolm Groom, PO Box 3071, West Hobart -
Postmarks and Cancellations
PPOSTMARKSOSTMARKS && CCANCELLATIONSANCELLATIONS …an Overview PPRESENTATIONRESENTATION TTOPICSOPICS Postmarks Cancellations Handstamps Machine Usage Collecting Ideas Reference Materials PPOSTMARKSOSTMARKS A postmark (aka datestamp) is a postal marking made on a letter or package indicating the date that the item was accepted by the postal service. Many formats exist. CCANCELLATIONSANCELLATIONS A cancellation (or cancel) is a postal marking applied to a postage stamp or a piece of postal stationery indicating that the item has been used. The primary purpose of cancels is to prevent the reuse of stamps. PPOSTMARKSOSTMARKS ASAS CCANCELSANCELS The terms cancel and postmark are used interchangeably. A prime reason is the use of postmarks directly on the stamp. SSTAMPLESSTAMPLESS EERARA PPOSTMARKSOSTMARKS The first postmark (called the “Bishop Mark”) was introduced by English Postmaster General Henry Bishop in 1661. It showed only the date and month of mailing. The format of the Bishop Mark changed during the 1700’s. Can you guess the dates on the postmarks below? 1661 Early 1700’s Late 1700’s FFRANKLINRANKLIN MMARKARK During colonial times, American postmarks included the Franklin Mark shown on this letter from Boston to Providence. The Franklin Mark is similar to the Bishops Mark. The 8-cent postal fee is hand- written at the bottom of the letter. Fees ranged from 8-25 cents and were based on number of pages and distance. Source: Mathew Bennett Auctions EEARLYARLY SSERVICESERVICES In 1680 William Dockwra founded the London Penny Post. This service introduced several ideas (including local service, identification of processing locations and time stamping) that are used to this day. Costs: 1p within London 2p up to 10 miles Source: www.earsathome.com (1700’s cover) BBRITISHRITISH FFREEREE FFRANKINGRANKING In 1652, members of Parliament, the Clergy and some other nobility were given the privilege of posting letters for free. -
Congressional Franked Mail: Overview
Updated February 7, 2019 Congressional Franked Mail: Overview Background Cost of Congressional Official Mail Official mail, sometimes referred to as “franked mail,” According to USPS, Congress spent $19.8 million on allows Members of Congress to transmit mail matter under official mail during FY2018, representing approximately their signature, or “frank,” without prepayment for postage. 0.4% of the $4.7 billion budget for the entire legislative Members’ ability to send franked mail facilitates official branch for FY2018. House official mail costs ($18.5 communication between elected officials and their million) were 94% of the total, whereas Senate official mail constituents. Although franked mail does not require costs ($1.2 million) were 6% of the total. During FY2017, prepayment of postage, Congress pays the U.S. Postal Congress spent $7.7 million on official mail. House official Service for the cost of franked mail in annual mail costs ($6.5 million) were 85% of the total, whereas appropriations bills. Senate official mail costs ($1.2 million) were 15% of the total. Figure 1 shows House and Senate official mail costs Members’ use and the content of official mail is regulated from FY1979-FY2018. by several sources, including federal law and chamber rules and regulations. Official communications sent as franked Figure 1.Official Mail Costs, FY1978-FY2018 mail may include such items as letters in response to By Chamber, Nominal Dollars constituent requests for information, newsletters regarding legislation and Member votes, press releases about official Member activities, copies of the Congressional Record and government reports, and notices about upcoming town meetings organized by Members, among others. -
Regulations Governing the USE of the MAILING FRANK by Members and Officers of the United States Senate
Regulations Governing THE USE OF THE MAILING FRANK by Members and Officers of The United States Senate SELECT COMMITTEE ON ETHICS UNITED STATES SENATE April 2008 SELECT COMMITTEE ON ETHICS United States Senate BARBARA BOXER, California, Chairman JOHN CORNYN, Texas, Vice Chairman MARK PRYOR, Arkansas PAT ROBERTS, Kansas KEN SALAZAR, Colorado JOHNNY ISAKSON, Georgia Robert L. Walker, Chief Counsel and Staff Director Annette Gillis, Deputy Staff Director Kenyen Brown, Senior Counsel and Director of Education/Training John Sassaman, Senior Counsel Matthew Mesmer, Counsel Elizabeth Horton, Counsel Tremayne Bunaugh, Counsel William Corcoran, Counsel Lynn Tran, Counsel (ii) CONTENTS FOREWORD ............................................. (v) CHAPTER ONE WHO MAY USE THE MAILING FRANK .........1 1. Senators and Officers of the Senate .........................1 2. Responsibility for Use of the Mailing Frank ..................1 3. Senator-elect ...........................................1 4. Prohibition on Loan of the Frank ...........................1 5. Senator Who Has Resigned ...............................3 6. Upon the Death of a Senator; Responding to Letters of Condolence Upon the Death of a Senator’s Spouse ......................3 7. Committees ............................................3 8. Penalty for Unauthorized Use ..............................4 CHAPTER TWO CONTENTS OF FRANKABLE MAIL ............5 1. Policy of Congress ......................................5 2. Intent of Congress .......................................5 3. Matters -
AIRPOST JOURNAL AMERICAN AIR MAIL SOCIETY Entered Aa Serand-Class Matter, February 10, 1932
:J/ie - October; 1953 • AIRPOST 25th JOURNAL 0 · ~< --- ::~; ~- : ; ' ' -2; - . &;j:; m!:__ I Hi ¥ mp~ ·--- · ·~- i?;.. ; i 2 . =--::-- -_;u:;;;; . ; _. f!!'.f e CANADA'S NEWLY DESIGNED A'EROOBAMME . OFFICIAL MONTHLY PUBLICATION OF THE VoJ. XXV N~I c DEPENDABLE I COMPLETE ~¢ NEW ISSUE SERVICE ~= ~ FREE ~'J~ DESCRIPTIVE FOLDER - ~ ~ 1953 ,.,.~ ~ ~ '~ INCLUDING SUPPLEMENT !~ TO MAY. 1953 ~ ~ ..~, $4.75 ~:... _,~ I • ~~~ ~~~ ~ NICOLAS SANABRIA CO., INC. ~ A. MEDA WAR, President ~ · 521 FIFTH AVENUE NEW YORK 17. -N. Y • .- B'ritis:ti::il./Air'1 StamJ~!i. '···-': by R. E. R. .DAL WICK CONCLUDING INSTALLMENT• • 1933, Nov. 2. Hull - Grimsby will be· found on back cover) Book of A special label was provided for mail 51-", flown between the above two points by A set of five colour trials are known, East Yorkshire Motor Services, Ltd. printed on glossy white paper in the The label, measuring about 47 x following colours: brown, green, violet, 65rnm, was printed in bright metallic dark red & blue ( adopted). These trials blue on a silver background. The main are imperforate and do not bear any feature of the wording was, reading up serial numbers. wards in center "Hull-Grimsby (Para When the requisite number of stamps gon Square) (Old Market Place)". had been printed to fulfill the order the There was only one mail carrying plate was defaced. flight on this thrice daily Air Ferry. 1934. "The Island Air Express" 1934, Feb. 3. Portsmouth - Ryde, I. o. w. The Partsmouth, Southsea & Isle of Special stamp printed in sheets of four Wight Aviation Ltd. in anticipation of and bound into booklets of five sheets expanding internal air services, ordered ( 20 stamps) were used for this service.