Maritime Arrest Legal Reflections on the International Arrest Conventions and on Domestic Law in Germany and Sweden

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Maritime Arrest Legal Reflections on the International Arrest Conventions and on Domestic Law in Germany and Sweden University of Stockholm Faculty of Law Maritime Arrest Legal Reflections on the International Arrest Conventions and on Domestic Law in Germany and Sweden Thesis for obtaining the degree of a “Master of International Law” with specialization in Maritime and Transport Law (LL.M.) Andree Kirchner 6 March 2001 Supervisor: Professor Dr. Hugo Tiberg Director, Axel Ax:son Johnsons Institut för Sjörätt och annan Transporträtt Maritime Arrest CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................................III Andree Kirchner I. THE ARREST CONVENTIONS............................................................................................ 2 A. THE 1952 ARREST CONVENTION.............................................................................................2 B. THE 1999 ARREST CONVENTION.............................................................................................8 II. GERMANY............................................................................................................................ 14 A. INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................14 B. MARITIME ARREST...............................................................................................................15 1. Requirements of Arrest.................................................................................................... 15 a) Claim of Arrest ............................................................................................................15 (1) Money Claim...........................................................................................................16 (2) Debtor .....................................................................................................................17 b) Reason to Arrest...........................................................................................................20 c) Jurisdiction of a German Court.....................................................................................34 d) Assets to be Arrested....................................................................................................35 2. Execution of Arrest.......................................................................................................... 35 3. Arrest of a Foreign Ship .................................................................................................. 36 C. INADMISSIBLE ARREST .........................................................................................................37 III. SWEDEN ........................................................................................................................... 40 A. INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................40 B. MARITIME ARREST...............................................................................................................41 1. Requirements of Arrest.................................................................................................... 41 a) Claim of Arrest ............................................................................................................41 b) Reason to Arrest...........................................................................................................43 c) Jurisdiction of a Swedish Court ....................................................................................44 d) Assets to be Arrested....................................................................................................46 2. Execution of Arrest.......................................................................................................... 47 3. Arrest of a Foreign Ship .................................................................................................. 50 IV. CONCLUSION.................................................................................................................. 54 BIBLIOGRAPHY.......................................................................................................................... 56 Die Deutsche Bibliothek – CIP-Einheitsaufnahme ANNEX I ........................................................................................................................................ 66 ANNEX II....................................................................................................................................... 73 Maritime Arrest: Legal Reflections on the International Arrest Conventions and on Domestic Law in Germany and Sweden / ANNEX III ..................................................................................................................................... 85 von Andree Kirchner. ANNEX IV....................................................................................................................................115 Bremen: Andree Kirchner, 2001 ANNEX V......................................................................................................................................148 ANNEX VI ....................................................................................................................................152 ISBN 3-9808857-0-4 ANNEX VII...................................................................................................................................155 ANNEX VIII .................................................................................................................................156 ANNEX IX....................................................................................................................................157 ANNEX X......................................................................................................................................158 ISBN 3 9808857 0 4 © Andree Kirchner 2001 All Rights Reserved II ABBREVIATIONS Justice) e.g. Lat.: exempli gratia (for example) AG Ger.: Amtsgericht (local court) ECJ European Court of Justice B/L - Bs/L Bill of Lading - Bills of Lading ed. editor Baltime Uniform Time-Charter (BIMCO) edn. Edition BayObLG Ger.: Bayerisches Oberstes Landesgericht (Higher Regional Court of Bavaria in Munich) EEC European Economic Community BB Ger.: Betriebsberater (law journal) et al. Lat.: et alii (and others) BFH Ger.: Bundesfinanzhof (Federal Fiscal Court) et seq. - et Lat.: et sequens (and the following) - et sequentes (and those following) seqq. BGB Ger.: Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (German Civil Code) ETR Ger.: Europäisches Transportrecht (law journal) BGBl. Ger.: Bundesgesetzblatt (Federal Law Gazette) FOC flag of convenience BGH Ger.: Bundesgerichtshof (Federal High Court of Justice) Fr. French BIMCO Baltic and International Maritime Conference FRL Sw.: Förmånsrättslagen (Right of Priority Act) BT- Ger.: Bundestagsdrucksache (Printed Matter of the Federal Parliament) Gencon Uniform General Charter of the BIMCO Drucksache cf. Confer Ger. German ch. chapter GVGA Ger.: Geschäftsanweisung für Gerichtsvollzieher (bailiff office instructions) CMI Fr.: Comité Maritime International (International Maritime Committée) Hansa Ger.: Zentralorgan für Schiffahrt, Schiffbau, Häfen (technics and law journal) CPO Ger.: Civilprozeßordnung (Code of Civil Procedure of the German Reich) HGB Ger.: Handelsgesetzbuch (German Commercial Code) DB Ger.: Der Betrieb (law journal) HGZ Ger.: Hanseatische Gerichtszeitung (Hanseatic Court Gazette) Deutzeit Deutscher Zeit-Frachtvertrag 1912 (time charter party) HOLG Ger.: Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht (Hanseatic Higher Regional Court) in Bremen or Hamburg Dfl. Dutch Florin i.a. Lat.: inter alia (among other things) Diss. Ger.: Dissertation (doctoral thesis) i.e. Lat.: id est (that is to say) DM Ger.: Deutsche Mark (deutschemark) ibid. Lat.: ib idem (in the same page) Doc. Document ICS International Chamber of Shipping DRiZ Ger.: Deutsche Richterzeitung (law journal) IMO International Maritime Organisation (former Inter-Governmental Maritime Ds Ju Sw.: Departementsserien (Official Report Series published by the Ministry of III IV (IMCO) Consultative Organisation) RB Sw.: Rättegångsbalk (Swedish Code of Judicial Procedure) IPRax Ger.: Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (law journal) resp. respectively ISSA International Ship Suppliers Association RG Ger.: Reichsgericht (Supreme Court of the German Reich) JD Sw.: Justitiedepartementet (Ministry of Justice) RGBl. Ger.: Reichsgesetzblatt (Reich Law Gazette, 1871-1945) JIGE Joint Intergovernmental Group of Experts (IMO/UNCTAD) RGZ Ger.: Reichsgericht in Zivilsachen (Reports of the RG in civil matters) JURIS legal database (German) RIW Ger.: Recht der Internationalen Wirtschaft (law journal) JW Ger.: Juristische Wochenschrift (law journal) RT Ger.: Reichstag (Parliament of the German Reich) KG Ger.: Kammergericht (Higher Regional Court of Berlin) RVO Ger.: Reichsversicherungsordnung (German Reich Insurance Code) Kryss Sw.: Kryss & Till Rors (maritime journal) sc. Lat.: scilicet (namely) L/C Letter of Credit SchiffRG Ger.: Gesetz über Rechte an eingetragenen Schiffen und Lat. Latin Schiffsbauwerken (German Law on Rights in Registered Ships and Ships under Construction) LG Ger.: Landgericht (Regional Court) sec. - secs. section – sections LL.M. Lat.: legum magister (Master of Laws) SjöL Sw.: Sjölagen (SMC) M.S. Motor ship SOU Sw.: Statens Offentliga Utredningar (the Official Report Series of Legislative MC Swedish Maritime Code and Investigations
Recommended publications
  • Transport and Transport Law: Historical Relationship and Prospects Background
    64 https://doi .org/10 .30932/1992-3252-2019-17-3-56-70 Transport and Transport Law: Historical Relationship THEORY and Prospects Dukhno, Nickolay A., Russian University of Transport, Moscow, Russia*. Nickolay A. DUKHNO ABSTRACT When considering the current The article, dedicated to the 210 th state of transport law in Russia, anniversary of creation of a single various approaches to the Russian transport administration and composition and degree of autonomy transport education and based on of the transport law area, as well as historical information, analyzes the certain regulatory issues, are relationship between development of analyzed. transport and transport law in Russia. The general tasks of transport law The increasing need for legal in the sphere of regulation of the most regulation of more and more relevant fields of transport activity complicated and increasingly complex are determined, the possibility of transport relations comprises creating a single code of transport development of transport law as one of legislation and legal norms, the the key tasks in achieving the goals of importance of intensifying transport the transport industry. and legal research are substantiated. Keywords: transport law, transport, transport relations, transport legislation, science of transport law, legal relations, transport safety, state law, civil law. *Information about the author: Dukhno, Nickolay A. – D.Sc. (Law), professor, director of Law Institute of Russian University of Transport, Moscow, Russia, [email protected]. Article received 14.03.2019, accepted 27.06.2019. For the original Russian text please see р. 56. • WORLD OF TRANSPORT AND TRANSPORTATION, Vol. 17, Iss. 3, pp. 56–70 (2019) Dukhno, Nickolay A.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Law Versus Common Law Concept of Freight Forwarders
    CIVIL LAW VERSUS COMMON LAW CONCEPT OF FREIGHT FORWARDERS Borka Tushevska Ph.D, Faculty of law, University “Goce Delcev” – Shtip [email protected] Abstract Present research paper is focused on the comparative aspects of freight forwarders. Starting this paper with theoretical analysis of the “representation doctrine,” and exploring the status of the freight forwarder in Germany, United Kingdom and United Stated of America, we focused our attention on the liability of the freight forwarders towards the principal and the third party in civil and common law systems. Observing the existing legislation, judicial and arbitration practices, we present the advantages and disadvantages of the two divergent systems of freight forwarders: German legal system versus British and American legal systems/Continental versus Anglo-Saxon legal systems. The main core of this topic is “the concept of representation,” where the place of the freight forwarder is inevitable. We also analyze the justification of Anglo-Saxon model of freight forwarder with accent on the non-vessel operating common carrier (hereafter NVOCCs), as the most sophisticated model of freight forwarder in global frames. This paper also deliberates the legal repercussions of the unsettled status of the freight forwarders vis-à-vis any third person and his principal. Regarding this issue, economic effects have never been subject of discussion. Just a superficial examination of this topic is enough to conclude that each type of representation lead to achieving one objective and it’s
    [Show full text]
  • Germany (1950-2018)
    Germany Self-rule INSTITUTIONAL DEPTH AND POLICY SCOPE Germany has two-tiered regional governance consisting of sixteen Länder and (Land)Kreise. Several Länder have a third tier between these two, Regierungsbezirke (administrative districts). Two Länder have a fourth tier of regional governance, Landschaftsverbände in North-Rhine Westphalia and Bezirksverband Pfalz in Rhineland-Palatinate.1 The 1949 Basic Law of the German Federal Republic granted eleven Länder extensive competences, which include legislative powers for culture, education, universities, broadcasting/television, local government, and the police (C 1949, Art. 74; Council of Europe: Germany 1999; Hrbek 2002; Swenden 2006; Watts 1999a, 2008). Länder also exercise residual competences (C 1949, Art. 70). In addition, the Basic Law states that Länder are responsible for the implementation of most federal laws (C 1949, Arts. 83–85). The federal government may legislate to preserve legal and economic unity with respect to justice, social welfare, civil law, criminal law, labor law, and economic law (C 1949, Art 72.2), and it has authority to establish the legislative framework in higher education, the press, environmental protection, and spatial planning (C 1949, Art. 72.3; Reutter 2006). The federal government exercises sole legislative authority over foreign policy, defense, currency, and public services (C 1949, Art. 73; Council of Europe: Germany 1999; Hrbek 2002; Swenden 2006; Watts 1999a, 2008). It also has exclusive authority over immigration and citizenship (C 1949, Arts. 73.2 and 73.3), though Länder administer inter-Land immigration and have concurrent competence on residence (Bendel and Sturm 2010: 186-187; C 1949, Arts. 74.4 and 74.6).2 However, this is not enough to qualify for the maximum score on policy scope.β The constitutional division of authority was extended to the five new Länder after unification in 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • Ship Arrests in Practice 1 FOREWORD
    SHIP ARRESTS IN PRACTICE ELEVENTH EDITION 2018 A COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE TO SHIP ARREST & RELEASE PROCEDURES IN 93 JURISDICTIONS WRITTEN BY MEMBERS OF THE SHIPARRESTED.COM NETWORK Ship Arrests in Practice 1 FOREWORD Welcome to the eleventh edition of Ship Arrests in Practice. When first designing this publication, I never imagined it would come this far. It is a pleasure to announce that we now have 93 jurisdictions (six more than in the previous edition) examined under the questionnaire I drafted years ago. For more than a decade now, this publication has been circulated to many industry players. It is a very welcome guide for parties willing to arrest or release a ship worldwide: suppliers, owners, insurers, P&I Clubs, law firms, and banks are some of our day to day readers. Thanks are due to all of the members contributing to this year’s publication and my special thanks goes to the members of the Editorial Committee who, as busy as we all are, have taken the time to review the publication to make it the first-rate source that it is. The law is stated as of 15th of January 2018. Felipe Arizon Editorial Committee of the Shiparrested.com network: Richard Faint, Kelly Yap, Francisco Venetucci, George Chalos, Marc de Man, Abraham Stern, and Dr. Felipe Arizon N.B.: The information contained in this book is for general purposes, providing a brief overview of the requirements to arrest or release ships in the said jurisdictions. It does not contain any legal or professional advice. For a detailed synopsis, please contact the members’ law firm.
    [Show full text]
  • In-Service Safety for Automated Vehicles July 2019
    In-service safety for automated vehicles July 2019 Consultation regulation impact statement Report outline Title In-service safety for automated vehicles Type of report Council of Australian Governments Consultation Regulation Impact Statement Purpose For public consultation Abstract This consultation Regulation Impact Statement (RIS) seeks feedback on the role and regulation of different parties involved in the safe operation of automated vehicles on Australian roads (‘in- service’). It considers safety duties that should apply to these parties and the institutional and regulatory arrangements to support them. Submission Submissions will be accepted until Monday 26 August online at details www.ntc.gov.au or by mail to: Attn: In-service safety for automated vehicles National Transport Commission Level 3/600 Bourke Street Melbourne VIC 3000 Key words automated driving systems, automated driving system entities, automated vehicles, cost–benefit analysis, general safety duty, regulation impact statement, safety assurance system Contact National Transport Commission Level 3/600 Bourke Street Melbourne VIC 3000 Ph: (03) 9236 5000 Email: [email protected] www.ntc.gov.au In-service safety for automated vehicles July 2019 ii Contents Report outline ii Executive summary 6 1 Context 10 Purpose of this chapter 10 About the NTC 10 The opportunity 10 1.3.1 Timelines for deployment 11 Objectives of this work 12 Previous consultation 12 Purpose of this consultation Regulation Impact Statement 13 Key concepts 14 Background 16 1.8.1 The National Road
    [Show full text]
  • STUDY RELATING to LIABILITY for WRONGFUL ARREST Summary Of
    STUDY RELATING TO LIABILITY FOR WRONGFUL ARREST Summary of NMLAs answers to the CMI questionnaire By the Rapporteur1 to the CMI IWG Aleka Sheppard [ Where there are [ ] in the text is the Rapporteur’s comment in an attempt to explain the meaning of the particular answer] Table of contents I. INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS: ............................................................................. 17 1. a) Please advise which, if any, of the following Conventions your jurisdiction is a party to and has given effect to in its legislation: .................................................................................. 17 i) Arrest Convention 1952 ....................................................................................................... 17 ii) Arrest Convention 1999 ...................................................................................................... 17 iii) Maritime Liens and Mortgages Convention 1926 ................................................................ 17 2. iv) Maritime Liens and Mortgages Convention 1993 ......................................................... 17 b) If none of the above is made part of your national law, or in any event, what are the grounds on which a vessel can be arrested in your country? ................................................................. 17 A. Australia and New Zealand: ................................................................................................... 17 B. Brazil: ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Concept of Stare Decisis in the German Legal System – a Systematically Inconsistent Concept with High Factual Importance
    Pobrane z czasopisma Studia Iuridica Lublinensia http://studiaiuridica.umcs.pl Data: 01/10/2021 21:41:15 Part 4. Studia Iuridica Lublinensia vol. XXVII, 1, 2018 DOI: 10.17951/sil.2018.27.1.121 Peter Stainer Attorney-at-law, Frankfurt am Main, Germany [email protected] Dominik König Inhouse legal counsel, Bad Homburg, Germany [email protected] The Concept of Stare Decisis in the German Legal System – A Systematically Inconsistent Concept with High Factual Importance Koncepcja stare decisis w systemie prawa niemieckiego – niespójna systemowo koncepcja posiadająca wysoką realną wartość SUMMARY It is worth mentioning that the German legal system is based on the codified law. This system lacks in stare decisis and precedentsUMCS in general, which – in principle – does not raise doubts. The role of precedent in the decisional process is relative and dependent on the question as to whether the case may be resolved pursuant to a legal act. In that case, precedents would not play any or almost any role at all. However, the role of precedents increases, when there is a lack of appropriate legal rights, or if legal rights require inter- pretation. It should be emphasised that stare decisis understood as a formally binding precedent refers only to rulings issued by the Federal Constitutional Court, whereas precedents of higher courts have a significant meaning to everyday judicial practice in Germany, despite the fact that they are not formally binding. Keywords: stare decisis; precedent; German legal system; Federal Constitutional Court INTRODUCTION Stare decisis is an abbreviation of the Latin phrase stare decisis et non quieta movere, meaning “to stand by decisions and not to disturb settled matters”1.
    [Show full text]
  • Multimodal Transport Law
    MULTIMODAL TRANSPORT LAW The law applicable to the multimodal contract for the carriage of goods MULTIMODAL TRANSPORT LAW The law applicable to the multimodal contract for the carriage of goods MULTIMODAAL VERVOERRECHT Het toepasselijke recht op de multimodale overeenkomst voor goederenvervoer Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam op gezag van de rector magnificus Prof.dr. H.G. Schmidt en volgens besluit van het College voor Promoties. De openbare verdediging zal plaatsvinden op Donderdag 10 december 2009 om 11.30 uur door Maria Anna Ida Henriëtte Hoeks geboren te Hengelo (Ov) PROMOTIECOMMISSIE Promotor : PROF.DR. K.F. HAAK Overige leden : PROF.DR. M.A. CLARKE PROF.DR. F.J.M. DE LY PROF.DR. F.G.M. SMEELE A sales edition of this dissertation is published by Kluwer Law International, The Hague, The Netherlands. Cover design: Marian Hoeks Printed by: Proefschriftmaken.nl All rights reserved © 2009, M.A.I.H. Hoeks, Breda, The Netherlands No part of the material protected by the copyright notice may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without prior permission from the copyright owner. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I feel deeply indebted to a great many people who have inspired and supported me during the writing of this work on multimodal transport law. First and foremost, I wish to thank my supervisor, Professor Krijn Haak for inspiring me to choose research in addition to teaching, for his invaluable guidance when I set my first steps on the road of academia, his encouragement and tireless support during the writing of this book, and for granting me the opportunity to pick his brain time and again in sessions which took up a lot of his precious time.
    [Show full text]
  • International Maritime and Transport Law Course 2020!
    INTERNATIONAL MARITIME AND TRANSPORT LAW COURSE COLLOQUIUM ON JUDICIAL SALE OF SHIPS LEGAL ASPECTS OF DIGITALISATION IN TRANSPORT AND RECENT DEVELOPMENTS OF MARITIME LAW TRANSPORT LAW DE LEGE FERENDA 2020 INTER-UNIVERSITY CENTRE DUBROVNIK, CROATIA 7 - 9 September 2020. INTERNATIONAL MARITIME AND TRANSPORT LAW COURSE DUBROVNIK, 7 - 9 September 2020 7 September 2020 Dear colleagues and friends, On behalf of the Croatian Maritime Law Association, we would like to welcome you to the International Maritime and Transport Law Course 2020! Although we might repeat that the year 2020 has been all about COVID-19, let us not develop another discourse about the “New Normal” nor explain how radically this pandemic has changed the way we communicate and indeed the way we live. Naturally, it has also influenced the format of our IUC Course. After we have become aware that a live event would not be possible, we have been experiencing serious dilemmas - from cancelling the 2020 Course entirely to organizing it as a virtual meeting. Finally, we have agreed to prepare a hybrid event as a compromise solution with two co-ordinators, just a few speakers and several attendees from Croatia on-site at the Inter-University Centre in Dubrovnik and with the majority of speakers and participants from Croatia and other countries connected online by video link. We have also decided to 'downsize' the total format of the International Maritime and Transport Law Course from a five-day to a three-day event. However, even as only a shorter version of the originally planned week course we hope that event will be a real maritime and transport law fair.
    [Show full text]
  • Ship Arrest in Greece
    SHIP ARREST IN GREECE Christos Th. Vardikos, Attorney at law Honorary Consul of the Commonwealth of Dominica, Partner at Vardikos & Vardikos Overview The Greek legal system provides basically for two types of seizure of the assets of a debtor, serving two different purposes, i.e. the provisional seizure, aiming to secure/ safeguard a claim (saisie-conservatoire) and the executory seizure, being one of the initial stages of the procedure for the enforcement of a title, leading to the public sale of the seized assets (saisie-execution). Applicable Laws Applicable International Convention to the arrest of ships in Greece. As regards vessels, Greece has ratified the International Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to the Arrest of Seagoing Ships (10.05.1952) which was implemented in Greece by Legislative Decree 4570/1966(the “Convention”). a. provisional seizure, aiming to secure/safeguard a claim (saisie-conservatoire) b. executory seizure, being one of the initial stages of the procedure for the enforcement of a title, leading to the public sale of the seized assets (saisie-execution) Provisional seizure (saisie-conservatoire) The Petioner(s): Any party alleging to have a claim against the owners of a specific vessel may apply for her arrest as Petitioner. The Respondent (s): The registered owner (please see par 6) The Petition: The petition in order to be complete should comprise the following elements: Full identity of the Petioner Full identity of the Respondent Description of the Vessel Factual allegations
    [Show full text]
  • The Future Law of Transport Operators and Service Providers
    The Future Law of Transport Operators and Service Providers Jan Ramberg 1 Introduction ………………………………………………………………….…. 136 2 The Development of International Transport Law Unification ………….…. 137 3 The Ocean Bill of Lading and Other Transport Documents ……………….. 141 4 Shortcomings of the Traditional Approach ………………………………….. 143 5 Logistics ………………………………………………………………………… 146 6 Logistics and Freight Forwarding ………………………………………….…. 147 7 Particular Rules for Storage of Goods? ………………………………………. 148 8 The Need for a New Approach ………………………………………………... 149 9 Summing up ………………………………………………………………….… 150 © Stockholm Institute for Scandianvian Law 1957-2010 136 Jan Ramberg:The Future Law of Transport Operators and Service Providers 1 Introduction Traditionally, transport law has developed differently for the different modes of transport. The old concept of “common carrier” has been maintained through the centuries signifying in principle a strict liability with exception of circumstances beyond control and this principle is still maintained in the international conventions governing carriage by rail, road and air.1 In maritime law, the development has been different as the principle of freedom of contract has prevailed until the advent of the 1924 Brussels Convention on Bills of Lading, the so-called Hague Rules.2 Although that convention requires for its applicability that a bill of lading or a similar document of title has been issued and governs the relationship between the holder of the bill of lading and the issuer, it could with some simplification be said that the convention normally applies in practice where the carrier has held himself out to customers generally thus making his services available to everyone without discrimination.3 If so, he would qualify as a common carrier4 as distinguished from a private carrier where the contract has been selectively made with his contracting party usually through the medium of brokers.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee on the Honouring of Obligations and Commitments by Member States of the European Charter of Local Self-Government (Monitoring Committee)
    Committee on the Honouring of Obligations and Commitments by Member States of the European Charter of Local Self-Government (Monitoring Committee) Original: English CG-MON(2020)17-03prov Restricted 22 June 2020 Monitoring of the European Charter of Local Self-Government in Austria Rapporteurs1 : Marc COOLS, Belgium (L, ILDG) Andrew DISMORE, United-Kingdom (R, SOC/G/PD) Preliminary draft recommendation ................................................................................................................ 2 Draft explanatory memorandum .................................................................................................................... 5 Summary This report is prepared following the second monitoring visit to Austria since the country ratified the Charter in 1987. It welcomes the constitutional and legal recognition and substantial implementation of the principle of local self-government in Austria, the introduction of the Länder Administrative Courts to strengthen the Austrian federalism, the extension of the competences of the associations of local authorities to cooperate and the reforms carried out since 2011 with a view to clarifying the distribution of competences between the Federation, the Länder and local authorities. The adoption of the New Government Plan with the objective, among other things, to tackle some of the outstanding issues reflected in this report has also been welcomed. At the same time, the rapporteurs stress that in Austria, there is still a high degree of complexity in the allocation of
    [Show full text]