Vegetarianism

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Vegetarianism Vegetarianism 1. Animal Cruelty Industrial farming is abusive to animals. Pigs. In America, nine out of ten of pregnant sows live in “gestation crates.” These pens are so small that the pigs can hardly move. When the sows are first crated, they flail around, as if they’re trying to escape from the crate. But soon they give up. The pigs often show signs of depression: they engage in meaningless, repetitive behavior, like chewing the air or biting the bars of the stall. The animals live in these conditions for four months. Gestation crates will be phased out in Europe by the end of 2012, but they will still be used in America.1 In nature, pigs nurse their young for about thirteen weeks. But in industrial farms, piglets are taken from their mothers after a couple of weeks. Because the piglets are weaned prematurely, they have a strong desire to suck and chew. But the farmers don’t want them sucking and chewing on other pigs’ tails. So the farmers routinely snip off (or “dock”) the tails of all their pigs. They do this with a pair of pliers and no anesthetic. However, the whole tail is not removed; a tender stump remains. The point is to render the area sensitive, so the pigs being chewed on will fight back.2 Over 113 million pigs are slaughtered each year in America.3 Typically, these pigs are castrated, their needle teeth are clipped, and one of their ears is notched for identification —all without pain relief.4 In nature, pigs spend up to three quarters of their waking hours foraging and exploring their environment.5 But in the factory farms, “tens of thousands of hogs spend their entire lives ignorant of earth or straw or sunshine, crowded together beneath a metal roof standing on metal slats suspended over a septic tank.”6 Bored, and in constant pain, the pigs must perpetually inhale the fumes of their own waste. Pigs in the industrial farming system suffer the effects of overcrowding. In 2000, the U.S. Department of Agriculture compared hog farms containing over 10,000 pigs (which is the norm) with farms containing under 2,000 pigs. The larger farms had three times as much mycoplasma pneumonia, six times as much swine influenza, and twenty-nine times as much flu of another strain.7 Some of the pigs die prematurely. Others get sick and are euthanized however the farmer sees fit. “The survivors live just long enough to stumble over the finish line—and onto our dinner plates.”8 This is how sausage is made. Cows. Over 33 million cows are slaughtered each year in America.9 These animals are also routinely mutilated without pain relief. American cows are hot-iron branded and castrated10; their tails are docked11; they are dehorned through sensitive tissue12; and their ears are cut for identification.13 The weaning process is traumatic for them, as it is for pigs. A calf would normally suckle from its mother for six months,14 but in factory farms, mother and child are separated almost immediately. Cows separated from their calves will mope and bellow for days.15 And then, if the calf is male, it might be put into the veal industry, with all its horrors.16 Cattle feedlots are like pre-modern cities, Michael Pollan writes, “teeming and filthy and stinking, with open sewers, unpaved roads, and choking air rendered visible by dust.”17 Ellen Ruppel Shell likens the feedlot to “a filth-choked slum.”18 Feedlot cattle often stand ankle-deep in their own waste19 and are exposed to the extremes in weather without shade or shelter.20 One study found that cattle lacking shade were four times more aggressive toward other cows than cattle in shade.21 This is how feedlot cows live, 24/7. Poor sanitation and stress make the cows ill. Also, they’re fed grain, which they didn’t evolve to eat.22 Feedlot cows often get acidosis (kind of like heartburn) which can lead to diarrhea, ulcers, bloat, rumenitis, liver disease, and a weakening of the immune system that can lead to pneumonia, coccidiosis, enterotoxemia, and feedlot polio.23 About one sixth of dairy cows have mastitis, a painful udder infection. Mastitis is exacerbated by bovine somatotrophin injections, which are banned in Europe but are routine in the U.S.24 Between 15% and 30% of feedlot cows develop abscessed livers. In some pens, it’s as high as 70%.25 Sometimes the cows die prematurely. A woman who runs a “dead-stock removal” company in Nebraska said that her company had hauled off 1,250 dead cattle during a recent heat wave and couldn’t handle all the calls it got.26 Cows normally live about twenty years, but the typical dairy cow is considered “spent” around age four.27 Before dying, the cow’s ride to the slaughterhouse may be long, cramped, and stressful. There are, in practice, no legal limits on how long calves can be trucked without food, water or rest.28 Chickens. Chickens in the egg industry are also mutilated: parts of their beaks are severed without pain relief.29 A chicken’s beak is rich in nerve endings, so the debeaking causes it severe pain. Why does the farmer do this? Because chickens cannot form a pecking order in the cramped conditions of the industrial chicken house. Thus, bigger chickens may peck smaller ones to death, and the prematurely killed chickens can’t be sold on the market. So, the farmer debeaks every bird. One type of cruelty justifies another. American farmers raise nearly nine billion chickens each year.30 Almost all of the chickens sold in supermarkets—“broilers”—are raised in windowless sheds, each housing 30,000+ birds.31 In these sheds, the chickens cannot move around without pushing through other birds. Nor can they stretch their wings or get away from more dominant birds.32 Also, the sheds stink of ammonia.33 “High ammonia levels give the birds chronic respiratory disease, sores on their feet and hocks, and breast blisters. It makes their eyes water, and when it is really bad, many birds go blind.”34 The chickens are bred for unnaturally fast growth, and so they cannot stand for long periods. Some cannot stand at all. Consequently, the chickens spend a lot of time sitting on the excrement-filled litter. One study found that 26% of broilers have chronic pain from bone disease.35 Broilers live for six or seven weeks.36 The egg-laying hens have it even worse. The farmers underfeed the hens because they don’t want them to grow rapidly—they want them to lay eggs for as long as possible. On some days, the hens get no food at all.37 Each hen gets less living space than a single sheet of typing paper.38 The hen “spends her brief span of days piled together with a half-dozen other hens in a wire cage … Every natural instinct of this hen is thwarted, leading to a range of behavioral ‘vices’ that can include cannibalizing her cage mates and rubbing her breast against the wire mesh until it is completely bald and bleeding.”39 Ten percent or so of the birds simply die under these conditions.40 Laying hens would normally live for more than five years, but in factory farms they’re killed after thirteen months.41 Temple Grandin, who designs humane slaughterhouses, was horrified to discover that male chicks—which aren’t used for food, since they don’t grow fast enough—are sometimes thrown in dumpsters.42 “Spent” hens might also be tossed in dumpsters, or buried alive, or thrust squirming into wood chippers.43 When the broilers are being rounded up for slaughter, one reporter writes, the catchers “grab birds by their legs, thrusting them like sacks of laundry into the cages, sometimes applying a shove.”44 And then later, dangling from one leg, “the frightened birds flap and writhe and often suffer dislocated and broken hips, broken wings, and internal bleeding.”45 Even after all that, the stunning system of electrified bath water sometimes fails to knock the birds out. Peter Singer and Jim Mason estimate that around three million chickens per year are still conscious as they’re dropped into tanks of scalding water.46 Turkeys. Turkeys are treated like broiler chickens.47 Seafood. Every year, human beings eat about 100 million tons of seafood. Americans alone eat around 17 billion marine creatures.48 Some of these creatures are caught in the ocean and killed. Others are raised in fish farms, which are landlocked ponds or cages in the sea. Today around one-third of the world’s seafood comes from fish farming.49 Fish farms are floating factory farms. Like factory farms, they’re extremely crowded. For example, 50,000 salmon may be confined in one cage at a density equivalent to putting each 30- inch fish in a bathtub of water.50 Or consider shrimp, America’s favorite seafood since 2001.51 While traditional shrimp farms yielded less than 450 pounds per acre, the newer, more efficient farms yield as much as 89,000 pounds per acre.52 For salmon, the overcrowding leads to stress, sea lice infestations, abrasions, and a high death rate.53 It also leads to abnormal behavior. Like the tigers that pace around tiny zoo cages, salmon swim in circles around their sea cages. Also, salmon are starved for seven to ten days before slaughter.54 Shrimp ponds, meanwhile, are “dangerously overcrowded and indifferently managed, plagued by overfeeding, plankton blooms, and inadequate water circulation.”55 Farmed shrimp are highly susceptible to infection, despite being given antibiotics.56 Some of these fish die.
Recommended publications
  • Descargar Libro Completo
    2013 2014 2015 2016 Barcelona, 2018 2017 ACTOS INTERNACIONALES EN BARCELONA Real Academia de Ciencias Económicas y Financieras DESAFÍOS DE LA NUEVA SOCIEDAD SOBRECOMPLEJA: HUMANISMO, TRANSHUMANISMO, DATAÍSMO Y OTROS ISMOS CHALLENGES OF THE NEW OVERCOMPLEX SOCIETY: HUMANISM, TRANSHUMANISM, DATAISM AND OTHER ISMS XIII ACTO INTERNACIONAL DE LA REAL ACADEMIA DE CIENCIAS ECONÓMICAS Y FINANCIERAS Barcelona, 15 y 16 de noviembre de 2018 DESAFÍOS DE LA NUEVA SOCIEDAD SOBRECOMPLEJA: HUMANISMO, TRANSHUMANISMO, DATAÍSMO Y OTROS ISMOS XIII Acto Internacional de la Real Academia de Ciencias Económicas y Financieras La realización de esta publicación ha sido posible gracias a con la colaboración de con el patrocinio de 27 de mayo de 2014 DESAFÍOS DE LA NUEVA SOCIEDAD SOBRECOMPLEJA: HUMANISMO, TRANSHUMANISMO, DATAÍSMO Y OTROS ISMOS XIII Acto Internacional de la Real Academia de Ciencias Económicas y Financieras Publicaciones de la Real Academia de Ciencias Económicas y Financieras Real Academia de Ciencias Económicas y Financieras Desafíos de la nueva sociedad sobrecompleja: humanismo, transhumanismo, dataísmo y otros ismos. XIII Acto Internacional / Real Academia de Ciencias Económicas y Financieras. Bibliografía ISBN- 978-84-09-08674-0 I. I. Título II. Gil Aluja, Jaime III. Colección 1. Economía mundial. 2. Tecnología e innovación 3. Biología humana 4. Bigdata La Academia no se hace responsable de las opiniones científicas expuestas en sus propias publicaciones. (Art. 41 del Reglamento) Editora: © Real Academia de Ciencias Económicas y Financieras, Barcelona, 2019 Académico Coordinador: Dra. Anna Maria Gil-Lafuente ISBN- 978-84-09-08674-0 Depósito legal: B 4985-2019 Esta publicación no puede ser reproducida, ni total ni parcialmente, sin permiso previo, por escrito de la editora.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Farm" Is the Story of a Farm Where the Animals Expelled Their
    Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/32376 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation Author: Vugts, Berrie Title: The case against animal rights : a literary intervention Issue Date: 2015-03-18 Introduction The last four decades have shown an especially intense and thorough academic reflection on the relation between man and animal. This is evidenced by the rapid growth of journals on the question of the animal within the fields of the humanities and social sciences worldwide.1 Yet also outside the academy animals now seem to preoccupy the popular mindset more than ever before. In 2002, the Netherlands was the first country in the world where a political party was established (the so-called “Partij voor de Dieren” or PvdD: Party for the Animals) that focused predominantly on animal issues. Heated discussions about factory-farming, the related spread of diseases (BSE/Q Fever), hunting and fishing practices, the inbreeding of domestic animals, are now commonplace. Animals, as we tend to call a large range of incredibly diverse creatures, come to us in many different ways. We encounter them as our pets and on our plates, animation movies dominate the charts and artists in sometimes rather experimental genres engage in the question of the animal.2 Globally speaking, animals might be considered key players in the climate debate insofar as the alarming rate of extinction of certain species is often taken to be indicative of our feeble efforts at preserving what is commonly referred to as “nature.” At the same time, these rates serve, albeit indirectly, as a grim reminder of the possible end of human existence itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Khazaal & Almiron 2014
    Published in Journalism Studies, 2016, 17(3):374-391. DOI: 10.1080/1461670X.2014.982966. “An Angry Cow Is Not A Good Eating Experience” How US and Spanish media are shifting from crude to camouflaged speciesism in concealing nonhuman perspectives Natalie Khazaal and Núria Almiron Recent developments in the ideology of speciesism (meaning bias against members of other animal species) within the media deserve analysis. Such discussion is important because speciesism is a major ethical concern. Nonhuman animals suffer massive harm within the industrial farming complex, confined throughout their lives and a high proportion killed while still infants or juveniles. The joint efforts of material institutions, cultural narratives and embodied affects conceal this from the public. As research on this topic is scarce, this study aims to provide tools to improve the quality of journalism regarding ethical issues that concern our relationship with nonhuman animals. We hope to help to formulate an emerging critical animal studies perspective on journalism studies. This article explores the role of news media in constructing perceptions of nonhumans used for food and their treatment. We compare 60 articles from The New York Times (United States) and El País (Spain) over a two-year time frame (2011–2013) using a critical discourse analysis. Our results show that, while both newspapers play a major role in concealing the nonhumans’ cruel reality, a distinction can be drawn between the crude speciesism of El País and the camouflaged, more deceptive style of The New York Times. KEYWORDS agribusiness; ideology; language; media; nonhuman animals; oppression; speciesism Introduction The 2009 episode “Dealbreakers Talk Show,” from the US sitcom 30 Rock, provided a telling quip about how often print journalism spares its readership the truth.
    [Show full text]
  • Tom Regan on 'Kind' Arguments Against Animal Rights and For
    WellBeing International WBI Studies Repository 2015 Tom Regan on ‘Kind’ Arguments Against Animal Rights and For Human Rights Nathan Nobis Morehouse College Follow this and additional works at: https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/acwp_sata Part of the Animal Studies Commons, Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons, and the Politics and Social Change Commons Recommended Citation Nobis, Nathan (2016). Tom Regan on Kind Arguments against Animal Rights and for Human Rights. In Mylan Engel Jr & Gary Comstock (eds.), The Moral Rights of Animals. Lexington Books. pp. 65-80. This material is brought to you for free and open access by WellBeing International. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of the WBI Studies Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Tom Regan on ‘Kind’ Arguments Against Animal Rights and For Human Rights Nathan Nobis Morehouse College, Atlanta, GA [email protected] www.NathanNobis.com 1/12/2014 2:10:42 PM; 7500 words Abstract: Tom Regan argues that human beings and some non-human animals have moral rights because they are “subjects of lives,” that is, roughly, conscious, sentient beings with an experiential welfare. A prominent critic, Carl Cohen, objects: he argues that only moral agents have rights and so animals, since they are not moral agents, lack rights. An objection to Cohen’s argument is that his theory of rights seems to imply that human beings who are not moral agents have no moral rights, but since these human beings have rights, his theory of rights is false, and so he fails to show that animals lack rights.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethics of the Meat Paradox
    The Ethics of the Meat Paradox Lars Ursin* The meat paradox—to like eating meat, but dislike killing and harming animals—confronts omnivores with a powerful contradiction between eating and caring for animals. The paradox, however, trades on a conflation of the illegitimacy of harming and killing animals. While harming animals is morally wrong, killing animals can be legitimate if done with minimal suffering and respect for the moral status of the animal. This moral status demands the ac- knowledgement of a certain justification for killing animals that makes modesty a virtue of the omnivore. The psychological problem with regard to killing animals can persist even if the moral tension is weakened, but only to a certain degree, since emotions and principles are interdependent in moral reasoning. Virtuous meat consumption demands a willingness to face the conflicting feelings involved in killing animals and to tolerate the resulting tension. INTRODUCTION Humans and animals interact in a number of ways and establish a diversity of relationships. Humans relate to animals as members of the family, as research objects in the laboratory, as guide dogs, trained animals in sports and shows, and still many other kinds of relations. In some of these relations, animals are edible beings. The relation between humans and animals that are eaten is a special one. Like animals sacrificed for research purposes, the animals we eat are killed by us. The acceptance and legitimacy of this killing is thus an essential part of eating animals. By eating animals, we enter into a very intimate relation with the animal. We eat parts of the animal and digest the parts, thus allowing these parts to be absorbed into our bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • OWNER's MANUAL. Contents
    Contents A-Z OWNER'S MANUAL. MINI. Online Edition for Part no. 01402983336 - X/17 MINI Owner's Manual for the vehicle Thank you for choosing a MINI. The more familiar you are with your vehicle, the better control you will have on the road. We therefore strongly suggest: Read this Owner's Manual before starting off in your new MINI. Also use the Integrated Owner's Manual in your vehicle. It con‐ tains important information on vehicle operation that will help you make full use of the technical features available in your MINI. The manual also contains information designed to en‐ hance operating reliability and road safety, and to contribute to maintaining the value of your MINI. Any updates made after the editorial deadline can be found in the appendix of the printed Owner's Manual for the vehicle. Get started now. We wish you driving fun and inspiration with your MINI. Online Edition for Part no. 01402983336 - X/17 © 2017 Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft Munich, Germany Reprinting, including excerpts, only with the written consent of BMW AG, Munich. US English ID4 X/17, 11 17 490 Printed on environmentally friendly paper, bleached without chlorine, suitable for recycling. Online Edition for Part no. 01402983336 - X/17 Contents The fastest way to find information on a partic‐ MOBILITY ular topic or item is by using the index, refer to 198 Refueling page 262. 200 Fuel The topics of Navigation, Entertainment, and 202 Wheels and tires Communication can be called up via the follow‐ 223 Engine compartment ing Owner's Manuals: Integrated Owner's 225 Engine oil Manual in the vehicle, Online Owner's Manual, 229 Coolant MINI Driver's Guide app.
    [Show full text]
  • Pandemics: a Very Short Introduction VERY SHORT INTRODUCTIONS Are for Anyone Wanting a Stimulating and Accessible Way Into a New Subject
    Pandemics: A Very Short Introduction VERY SHORT INTRODUCTIONS are for anyone wanting a stimulating and accessible way into a new subject. They are written by experts, and have been translated into more than 40 different languages. The series began in 1995, and now covers a wide variety of topics in every discipline. The VSI library now contains over 450 volumes—a Very Short Introduction to everything from Indian philosophy to psychology and American history and relativity—and continues to grow in every subject area. Very Short Introductions available now: ACCOUNTING Christopher Nobes ANAESTHESIA Aidan O’Donnell ADOLESCENCE Peter K. Smith ANARCHISM Colin Ward ADVERTISING Winston Fletcher ANCIENT ASSYRIA Karen Radner AFRICAN AMERICAN RELIGION ANCIENT EGYPT Ian Shaw Eddie S. Glaude Jr ANCIENT EGYPTIAN ART AND AFRICAN HISTORY John Parker and ARCHITECTURE Christina Riggs Richard Rathbone ANCIENT GREECE Paul Cartledge AFRICAN RELIGIONS Jacob K. Olupona THE ANCIENT NEAR EAST AGNOSTICISM Robin Le Poidevin Amanda H. Podany AGRICULTURE Paul Brassley and ANCIENT PHILOSOPHY Julia Annas Richard Soffe ANCIENT WARFARE ALEXANDER THE GREAT Harry Sidebottom Hugh Bowden ANGELS David Albert Jones ALGEBRA Peter M. Higgins ANGLICANISM Mark Chapman AMERICAN HISTORY Paul S. Boyer THE ANGLO-SAXON AGE AMERICAN IMMIGRATION John Blair David A. Gerber THE ANIMAL KINGDOM AMERICAN LEGAL HISTORY Peter Holland G. Edward White ANIMAL RIGHTS David DeGrazia AMERICAN POLITICAL HISTORY THE ANTARCTIC Klaus Dodds Donald Critchlow ANTISEMITISM Steven Beller AMERICAN POLITICAL PARTIES ANXIETY Daniel Freeman and AND ELECTIONS L. Sandy Maisel Jason Freeman AMERICAN POLITICS THE APOCRYPHAL GOSPELS Richard M. Valelly Paul Foster THE AMERICAN PRESIDENCY ARCHAEOLOGY Paul Bahn Charles O.
    [Show full text]
  • Moral Implications of Darwinian Evolution for Human Reference
    Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Dissertations Graduate Research 2006 Moral Implications of Darwinian Evolution for Human Reference Based in Christian Ethics: a Critical Analysis and Response to the "Moral Individualism" of James Rachels Stephen Bauer Andrews University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations Part of the Christianity Commons, Ethics in Religion Commons, Evolution Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Bauer, Stephen, "Moral Implications of Darwinian Evolution for Human Reference Based in Christian Ethics: a Critical Analysis and Response to the "Moral Individualism" of James Rachels" (2006). Dissertations. 16. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations/16 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Research at Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Thank you for your interest in the Andrews University Digital Library of Dissertations and Theses. Please honor the copyright of this document by not duplicating or distributing additional copies in any form without the author’s express written permission. Thanks for your cooperation. Andrews University Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary MORAL IMPLICATIONS OF DARWINIAN EVOLUTION FOR HUMAN PREFERENCE BASED IN CHRISTIAN ETHICS: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS AND RESPONSE TO THE “MORAL INDIVIDUALISM” OF JAMES RACHELS A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy by Stephen Bauer November 2006 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: 3248152 Copyright 2006 by Bauer, Stephen All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Humane Living
    Humane Living Eating for a Better World A smarter diet benefits animals—and our health Sarah (at right) A pig. A hen. A bull. Just three among the nearly 10 billion land can eat, she weighed 220 pounds, stocky and thick-legged. A tattoo animals who suffer each year on U.S. factory farms. All were name- over her rib cage identified her as one of more than 1,000 animals less “production units” bound for slaughter—until they escaped, raised on an Ohio factory farm, the offspring of a sow kept tightly and came into their own. confined in a gestation crate—a mother the pig had known only The pig was headed to her death in a two-level truck crammed during the few weeks she was allowed to nurse. with several hundred animals. Fresh from several months of “fin- The young pig’s existence might have ended as an entry on a ishing,” when young pigs are packed in pens and fed as much as they company ledger. Except that she tumbled out of the truck and onto the pavement. When volunteers from the Happy Trails Farm Animal Sanctuary came to her aid, she got a name, Scarlett, along with the recognition that she was more than bacon. Adopted by former Happy Trails employee Olivia Schlosser- Hogue, Scarlett became a mother to three smaller rescued pigs. And when the neighbor’s 3-year-old boy visited, she watched over him too, making sure he was all right if he fell. Every morning, she has a special greeting for Schlosser-Hogue and her husband, pushing her nose close to their faces and making a loud huffing sound pigs reserve for individuals above them in the social hierarchy.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C Cultural Resources Report
    APPENDIX C CULTURAL RESOURCES REPORT CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED FORMOSA SPECIFIC PLAN AT SANTA MONICA BOULEVARD, WEST HOLLYWOOD LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: David DeGrazia, Senior Planner City of West Hollywood Community Development Department 8300 Santa Monica Boulevard West Hollywood, CA 90069 Prepared by: EDAW, Inc. 515 South Flower Street, 9th Floor Los Angeles, California 90071 (213) 593-7700 Authors: Candace Ehringer, M.A. Angel Tomes, M.A. Monica Strauss, M.A. December 2007 U.S.G.S. Quadrangles: Hollywood, CA Keywords: West Hollywood, Santa Monica Boulevard, Faith Plating, Los Angeles County TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page MANAGEMENT SUMMARY.....................................................................................................iii INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 Report Organization............................................................................................................ 1 Project Personnel ................................................................................................................ 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION.............................................................................................................3 Project Location and Setting............................................................................................... 3 Project Components...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Vegan Mentor Program Resource Guide
    Vegan Mentor Program Resource Guide Thank you for participating in Catskill Animal Sanctuary’s Vegan Mentor program! Catskill Animal Sanctuary has thoroughly researched a variety of topics and media to help you help your mentee on their vegan journey. They are organized by topic, and then by resource type within each topic. The topic key will also help you find resources about the four major topics relating to a vegan lifestyle: animals, the environment, health, and vegan living. Resources with graphic content are also indicated. If you are viewing this list electronically, you can click on a title for an active link to a trailer, video, place to buy a book, etc. We encourage you to talk with your mentee to determine where their interests lie, and what types of resources - books, internet videos, documentaries, podcasts, etc. - they prefer. You are welcome to use other resources outside of the ones listed below. However, these resources must not: ● Encourage illegal activities ● Promote violence or aggression against any species ● Contain unsubstantiated claims or ‘facts’ ● Promote any type of trolling or bullying ● Support welfarist approaches to animal rights (i.e. advocating for the improving the treatment of animals as opposed to the cessation of their exploitation for food, clothing, entertainment, research, or for any reason) Please reach out to program staff if you have questions about these or other resources to be used, or to suggest additional resources. Happy mentoring! 1 Table of Contents For the Animals​ ​(Animals and Animal
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetarianism and Virtue: Does Consequentialism Demand Too Little?
    WellBeing International WBI Studies Repository 1-2002 Vegetarianism and Virtue: Does Consequentialism Demand Too Little? Nathan Nobis University of Rochester Follow this and additional works at: https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/acwp_aafhh Part of the Animal Studies Commons, Other Anthropology Commons, and the Other Nutrition Commons Recommended Citation Nobis, N. (2002). Vegetarianism and Virtue: Does consequentialism Demand Too Little?. Social Theory & Practice, 28(1), 135-156. This material is brought to you for free and open access by WellBeing International. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of the WBI Studies Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Vegetarianism and Virtue: Does Consequentialism Demand Too Little? Nathan Nobis Department of Philosophy, University of Rochester I will argue that each of us personally ought to be a vegetarian.1 Actually, the conclusion I will attempt to defend concerns more than one's eating habits in that I will argue that we should be "vegans." Not only should we not buy and eat meat, but we should also not purchase fur coats, stoles, and hats, or leather shoes, belts, jackets, purses and wallets, furniture, car interiors, and other traditionally animal-based products for which there are readily available plant-based or synthetic alternatives. (Usually these are cheaper and work just as well, or better, anyway.) I will argue that buying and eating most eggs and dairy products are immoral as well. (Since it's much easier
    [Show full text]