DOCSLIB.ORG

Congress of Vienna

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Congress of Vienna congress of vienna Topic A: Reconstructing a Post-Napoleonic Europe In the shadow of the most seminal revolution in modern history and the collapse of a French empire, delegates convened at Vienna to conclude settlements not addressed by the Treaty of Paris (1814). Many expected the proceedings to last weeks; all told, they spent over eight months in Vienna, arguing over territorial distributions, constitutionalism, and a plan of perpetual peace. This committee will place you in their position within standard BMUN procedure. Initially set in September of 1814, you will represent delegates who attended the Congress of Vienna and operate on a moving timeline; therefore, our committee will conclude in July of 1815 on the third day of BMUN conference. This also demands a certain General escape from Elba in February, a situation that must be addressed regardless of your progress through the topics. Topic A is primarily concerned with territorial arrangements not settled by the Treaty of Paris (1814) and the construction of a military alliance to prevent conflict. Having suffered continuous bloodshed since revolutionary France incited the War of the First Coalition (1792) and having finally toppled Napoleon Bonaparte - the briefly undisputed master of Europe more powerful than any Roman Emperor - a top priority was to avert the possibility of another armed conflict and the emergence of a Napoleon-esque figure through sound rearrangements of European borders and the formation of a military alliance. The specific questions our committee will center on are as follows: the arrangement of Italian city-states, the construction of a constitution governing German principalities in the absence of the Holy Roman Empire, and a system to avert European warfare. I chose this topic because I believe it offers a vital vantage point through which to examine world history; often lost in the zeitgeist, the arrangements established in Vienna would pave the way for many crucial events that followed. The reconstruction of Europe following the Napoleonic Era was an unprecedented undertaking, spearheaded by those who sought to undo the devastation of Napoleon’s reign and prevent others from following the footsteps of Revolutionary France. The strategic restructuring of various regions as part of this process fueled imperialism and modernized international relations, paving the way for BERKELEY MODEL UNITED NATIONS the standardization of European diplomacy. Foreknowledge is a useful asset here, so while crafting solutions keep in mind events that followed the Congress. While researching, also pay attention to the potency of ideologies (whether it be Jacobinism, Conservatism, Liberalism, or Nationalism) and the influence they had over the unfolding of events. Additionally, keep in mind that Topic A is closely connected to Topic B, and your solutions for one must operate in tandem with your solutions for the other; do not approach them in isolation. Topic B: Preventing Revolutions in European Territory In addition to concerns of a European-wide war, many delegates feared new insurrections resembling the French Revolution, a violent and radical uprising that would drastically shift politics in Europe. The Enlightenment ideals espoused and the forms of republicanism they established during France’s revolutionary expansion would foster new demands and expectations from the peoples of Europe; in our committee, you will face the questions that delegates at Vienna attempted to answer regarding constitutionalism, monarchy, and democracy. You must decide to what extent, if any, should elements of the Enlightenment (constitutionalism in particular) be implemented; which regions, if any, should see reform; and how a plan of perpetual peace, such as a military alliance or something distinct, should respond to revolutions. I chose this topic because of its connection to the French Revolution and democratic transitions more broadly. The push and pull between revolution, reform, and repression as revolutions persisted during this period is interesting and important; this was the moment the Enlightenment grew teeth, and as such it serves as a critical piece of political history for anyone hoping to study the birth of modern democracy. In addition, this topic deals with the nature of revolutions: how they begin, how can they succeed, and why they frequently fail. I find this a fascinating subject that underscores a great deal about the structure of government, the psychology of humans, and the impact of ideas; I hope you uncover compelling themes upon exploring it as well. In history textbooks, the French Revolution, along with the seeds of liberalization that it planted in the heart of Europe, is almost omnipresent. Fewer mention the reactionary response from monarchs that pushed back during the Congress of Vienna. Faced with an uncertain future, the leaders of Europe aimed to preserve the balance of power, check the spread of revolutionary movements, and erase the progress made in democratization. Unfortunately, similar echoes ring across nations over two hundred years later. BERKELEY MODEL UNITED NATIONS The single most important thing to consider when beginning your research is the following question: what caused the wave of revolutions that swept Europe for nearly five decades? The Enlightenment certainly played a role, but there were other factors involved, and historians frequently debate them; deciding where you stand on this question should serve as your foundation for solutions, so examine it with great care. Moreover, the relationship between power and the status quo is something to consider as well. Consider the events that followed the Congress of Vienna and the desires of the delegates who attended; did the delegates achieve their aims, or were there responses to the revolutionary fervor deficient? These are not simple questions, but grappling with them will yield stellar solutions and greatly prepare you for conference. We cannot wait to see you in February; make sure to prepare, and good luck. BERKELEY MODEL UNITED NATIONS.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download (2011Kb)
    Collection of the Agreements concluded by the European Communities Index and Alphabetical list of countries and international organizations Volumes 1-11 EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Collection of the Agreements concluded by the European Communities Index and Alphabetical list of countries and international organizations Volumes 1-11 EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES This publication is also available in DA ISBN 92-824-0302-5 DE ISBN 92-824-0303-3 FR ISBN 92-824-0305-X IT ISBN 92-824-0306-8 NL ISBN 92-824-0307-6 Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1986 ISBN 92-824-0304-1 Catalogue number: RX-44-85-937-EN-C © ECSC-EEC-EAEC, Brussels · Luxembourg, 1986 Printed in Belgium Notice to the reader This index covers all the texts published in Volumes 1 to 11 ; the titles and chief subject-matter of the Agreements concluded and the names of the Contracting Parties are listed analytically. It is followed by an alphabetical list of the countries and international organizations mentioned in these Agreements. ABBREVIATIONS ECSC European Coal and Steel Community (Treaty of Paris, signed 18.4.1951) Member States: the Kingdom of Belgium, the Federal Republic of Germany, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Kingdom of the Netherlands EEC European Economic Community (Treaty of Rome, signed 25.3.1957) Member States: the Kingdom of Belgium, the Federal Republic of Germany, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Kingdom of the Netherlands Euratom or European Atomic Energy Community EAEC (Treaty of Rome, signed 25.3.1957) Member States: the Kingdom of Belgium, the Federal Republic of Germany, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Kingdom of the Netherlands By the Treaty of Brussels (') of 22.1.1972, the Kingdom of Denmark, Ireland and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland became members of the European Communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles V, Monarchia Universalis and the Law of Nations (1515-1530)
    +(,121/,1( Citation: 71 Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 79 2003 Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline Mon Jan 30 03:58:51 2017 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use: Copyright Information CHARLES V, MONARCHIA UNIVERSALIS AND THE LAW OF NATIONS (1515-1530) by RANDALL LESAFFER (Tilburg and Leuven)* Introduction Nowadays most international legal historians agree that the first half of the sixteenth century - coinciding with the life of the emperor Charles V (1500- 1558) - marked the collapse of the medieval European order and the very first origins of the modem state system'. Though it took to the end of the seven- teenth century for the modem law of nations, based on the idea of state sover- eignty, to be formed, the roots of many of its concepts and institutions can be situated in this period2 . While all this might be true in retrospect, it would be by far overstretching the point to state that the victory of the emerging sovereign state over the medieval system was a foregone conclusion for the politicians and lawyers of * I am greatly indebted to professor James Crawford (Cambridge), professor Karl- Heinz Ziegler (Hamburg) and Mrs. Norah Engmann-Gallagher for their comments and suggestions, as well as to the board and staff of the Lauterpacht Research Centre for Inter- national Law at the University of Cambridge for their hospitality during the period I worked there on this article.
    [Show full text]
  • Treaty of Paris Imperial Age
    Treaty Of Paris Imperial Age Determinable and prepunctual Shayne oxidises: which Aldis is boughten enough? Self-opened Rick faradised nobly. Free-hearted Conroy still centrifuging: lento and wimpish Merle enrols quite compositely but Indianises her planarians uncooperatively. A bastard and the horse is insulate the 19th century BC Louvre Paris. Treaty of Paris Definition Date & Terms HISTORY. Treaty of Paris 173 US Department cannot State Archive. Treaty of Paris created at the conclusion of the Napoleonic Wars79 Like. The adjacent of Wuhale from 19 between Italy and Ethiopia contained the. AP US History Exam Period 3 Notes 1754-100 Kaplan. The imperial government which imperialism? The treaty of imperialism in keeping with our citizens were particularly those whom they would seem to? Frayer model of imperialism in constantinople, seen as well, to each group in many layers, sent former spanish. For Churchill nothing could match his handwriting as wartime prime minister he later wrote. Commissioner had been in paris saw as imperialism is a treaty of age for. More construction more boys were becoming involved the senior age of Hmong recruits that. The collapse as an alliance with formerly unknown to have. And row in 16 at what age of 17 Berryman moved from Kentucky to Washington DC. Contracting parties or distinction between paris needed peace. Hmong Timeline Minnesota Historical Society. To the Ohio Country moving journey from the French and British imperial rivalries south. Suffragists in an Imperial Age US Expansion and or Woman. Spain of paris: muslim identity was meant to both faced increasing abuse his right or having.
    [Show full text]
  • The Permanent Neutrality Treaties
    THE PERMANENTNEUTRALITY TREATIES The present European war has thrown into sharp relief the status of those smaller governments which, although in nowise shorn of attributes of sovereignty within their own borders, have nevertheless been placed by virtue of most solemn inter- national guarantees in a position of perpetual neutrality towards all other Powers. They are not to wage offensive warfare, nor, if the obligations resulting from these guarantees are faithfully observed, may their territories be in any degree the theatre of hostilities. While the chief examples of this peculiar status,- Belgium, Luxemburg and Switzerland,-are plainly, by reason of restricted area and population, in no condition to cope with the greater powers surrounding them, it is not alone their lack of size or strength that has marked them out for permanent neutrality or neutralization, but rather their essential relation to the map of Europe and the many conflicting interests innate in its geographical outlines which have seemed to make neces- sary their fixed withdrawal from plans of rivalry or territorial ambition and the creation in this manner of certain inter-spaces destined for peace whatever may be the fate of their more powerful neighbors. The precise conditions of such a neutrality are to be found in a long line of treaties and agreements comprising within their horizon a great variety of objects. For the purpose of the present examination, however, we shall lay out of detailed view all aspects of permanent neutrality save those attaching to the three governments just named since to consider the various phases of the subject would require much more space than that at the disposal of a single article.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterloo in Myth and Memory: the Battles of Waterloo 1815-1915 Timothy Fitzpatrick
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2013 Waterloo in Myth and Memory: The Battles of Waterloo 1815-1915 Timothy Fitzpatrick Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES WATERLOO IN MYTH AND MEMORY: THE BATTLES OF WATERLOO 1815-1915 By TIMOTHY FITZPATRICK A Dissertation submitted to the Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Fall Semester, 2013 Timothy Fitzpatrick defended this dissertation on November 6, 2013. The members of the supervisory committee were: Rafe Blaufarb Professor Directing Dissertation Amiée Boutin University Representative James P. Jones Committee Member Michael Creswell Committee Member Jonathan Grant Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the dissertation has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii For my Family iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank Drs. Rafe Blaufarb, Aimée Boutin, Michael Creswell, Jonathan Grant and James P. Jones for being on my committee. They have been wonderful mentors during my time at Florida State University. I would also like to thank Dr. Donald Howard for bringing me to FSU. Without Dr. Blaufarb’s and Dr. Horward’s help this project would not have been possible. Dr. Ben Wieder supported my research through various scholarships and grants. I would like to thank The Institute on Napoleon and French Revolution professors, students and alumni for our discussions, interaction and support of this project.
    [Show full text]
  • The Congress of Vienna and the Conservative Order of Europe
    The Congress of Vienna and the Conservative Order of Europe The Congress of Vienna After Napoleon had finally been defeated in 1815, the European monarchs breathed a huge sigh of relief. After all, the French Revolution and the development it had triggered had dominated European politics for more than a quarter of a century. Napoleon had not always been a passionate advocate of the French Revolution, yet his con- quest and occupation of Europe had contributed substantially to the spread of its ideas – liberty, equality, and fra- 5 ternity – all over the continent. Having defeated Napoleon, the monarchs of Europe were eager to ensure the restoration of peace and order. They were particularly anxious about the legacy of the ideas of the revolution, and therefore the governments of Europe were determined to follow policies that provided stability and squelch any kind of political turmoil. The Congress of Vienna, a conference of diplomats from all over Europe, tried to settle political and territ- 10 orial questions that had arisen from the Napoleonic Wars. The Congress began in 1814 when Napoleon was still exiled on Elba. In the beginning, delegates could not agree on any solutions which helped Napoleon re-establish his rule in France after his return from exile. However, after Napoleon’s final defeat at Waterloo in 1815, the Congress of Vienna took up its work again. The countries that had made the most vital contributions to defeat Napoleon were Russia, Great Britain, 15 Prussia, and Austria. Their representatives at the Congress were Tsar Alexander I of Russia, Lord Castlereagh – foreign secretary of Great Britain – King Frederick William III of Prussia, and Prince Klemens von Metternich* – chief minister of Austria and chairman of the conference.
    [Show full text]
  • Congress of Vienna Vs. Treaty of Versailles
    Assignment: Congress of Vienna vs. Treaty of Versailles (Chart and LEQ.) Both the Congress of Vienna and the Treaty of Versailles came after devastating conflicts in Europe, but both were approached quite drastically. Answer the below prompt: It has been a common part of European history to witness the execution of violent conflict and the resolution thereof through mutually agreed upon peace treaties, be it through negotiation or force. Prior to the Great War, the Napoleonic Wars had been one of the most devastating series of conflicts that the continent had witnessed, at least in terms of the destabilization it resulted in of the previously standing European powers. This conflict was resolved with the exile of Napoleon for the second time and the Congress of Vienna, intended to properly establish a stable, long-lasting balance of European power among the continent’s states. It was this balance of power that was agreed upon that the Great War was fought over. The Great War was similarly resolved by a treaty, and much like the treaty that ended the Napoleonic Wars, the Treaty of Versailles was negotiated between a wholly victorious and wholly defeated party/parties. When comparing these two peace treaties, it is apt to compare the degree of success that they attained. Looking at the Congress of Vienna, it is apparent that it saw comparatively greater success in attaining its goals when considering it against the Treaty of Versailles. The resulting peace of the Congress of Vienna was relatively unbroken, with no great European wars occurring, only small conflicts and revolutions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Congress of Vienna 1814 – 1815 Austria • Organized by Metternich to Create a Balance of Power, Preserve Peace, and Preve
    The Congress of Vienna 1814 – 1815 Austria • Organized by Metternich to create a balance of power, preserve peace, and prevent imperialism. Five superpowers organized the conference: Russia (represented by Czar Alexander I), Prussia (Prince Hardenberg), England (Lord Castlereagh and Wellesley Duke of Wellington), France (Talleyrand), and Austria (Metternich); the less powerful nations formed alliances. Talleyrand was a hero for France, keeping a little status for France despite the desire by the other nations to punish France for the destruction it had caused. • Actions taken: o France returned territories taken over by Napoleon o Holland/Netherlands formed out of two smaller Dutch Republics o Norway and Sweden merged o Switzerland became neutral o Russia dominates Finland and Poland o Prussia takes over Saxony and other Germanic principalities o Austria expanded o England gains colonies and maritime power o France restored to the legitimate government of the Bourbons o Spain organized under Ferdinand o Slave trade outlawed • The “balance of power” among the superpowers prevented any of them from imperialist domination. For example, a bid by Prussia and Russia to absorb Poland and Saxony between the two of them was vetoed by England, France, and Austria; it would have made Prussia and Russia much too powerful. • Reacting to 25 years of violence, and hoping to prevent a repeat, they had to combat the attitudes of the Revolution. Humans and society are not perfectible, and sudden change is harmful. One had to respect tradition, because it represents the accumulated wisdom of reason and experience, and to be cautious when making changes. Stable governments change slowly over time to adapt to new circumstances, but do not make sudden revolutionary changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Congress of Vienna
    Mini Guide Congress of Vienna Boston Invitational Model United Nations XVI February 10-12, 2017 // bosmun.org MINIGUIDE CONGRESS OF VIENNA + Congress of Vienna Start Date: November 1st, 1814 Following Napoleon's defeat and his renouncement of the throne in September of 1814, the state of Europe has been in much disarray over the aftermath of the Napoleonic wars. In an attempt to restructure and reorganize the powers of Europe, a congress has been called in Vienna, Germany. While most European states plan on making an appearance at the congress, there seems to be a clear alliance already forming between the nations of Austria, Prussia, Russia, and Great Britain by nature of the Treaty of Chaumont.1 Together these four powers have deemed themselves instrumental in the defeat of Napoleon. And while they have reached out to countries such as Sweden and Poland, the four view themselves as the strongest powers to be present at the Congress of Vienna and as such are attempting to maintain the ultimate control and decision making of the conference. As the conference delegates begin to convene, opinions over the procedures of how the congress will abide by are coming into conflict. While Austria, Prussia, Russia, and Great Britain deemed themselves the countries in control of the conference, representatives of France and other nations of weaker political position, are denying this as a possibility.2 Proceedings have been delayed as a result, but the date is now November 1st, 1814 and the 1 “Treaty of Chaumont” https://www.britannica.com/event/Treaty-of-Chaumont 2 “Congress of Vienna” https://www.britannica.com/event/Congress-of-Vienna PAGE 2 MINIGUIDE CONGRESS OF VIENNA congress is set to convene and begin debate.
    [Show full text]
  • The Caribbean and Iberoamerica and Its Impact for the Congress of Vienna and Viceversa
    1 The Congress of Vienna 1814-15: Making Peace After Global War, February5-7, 2015. European Institute at Columbia University, NYC The Caribbean and Iberoamerica and its impact for the Congress of Vienna and viceversa. Christian Cwik (University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago) The outbreak of the coalition wars (1792-1815) impacted the European colonies on a global level. In Iberoamerica and the Caribbean there was a spread of revolutions and the cry for the abolition of slavery. For many in Europe there was the view that “The revolution in the Americas is the revolution in Europe”. This was a serious fear among the victorious conservative elites during the Congress of Vienna. Revolutions in the Americas had not one but many faces: the call for independence, republicanism, democracy, liberalism, social utopianism and the abolition of slavery as well as the fight for universal franchise, property and many other fundamental changes. In the aftermath of the success of the thirteen British North American colonies in their fight for independence from London, other revolutionary changes had taken place on the North American main. American revolutionaries such as Benjamin Franklin, Silas Deane, Arthur Lee, and Thomas Jefferson, and French revolutionaries such as Louis Philippe, Comte de Ségur and the Marquis de Lafayette who had fought for the American cause spread the “virus of revolution” to France. Among the supporters also were revolutionaries from South America such as José Maria España and Francisco de Miranda, who spread the “virus” to Iberoamerica and the Caribbean. The repercussions were feared by many European statesmen, who devoted considerable attention to the issue and initiated a separate domain of exploration of the “South American Matter” during the Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • The French Revolution, Napoleon, and Congress of Vienna (1770
    FCPS World II SOL Standards: WHII 6e, 8a and 8b The French Revolution, Napoleon, and Congress of Vienna (1770-1850 C.E.) You Mean the Revolution Was More than a Bunch of Heads Being Chopped Off? Causes and Events of the French Revolution By the late 1700s, France was on the edge of revolution. The French people were inspired by both the American Revolution and the Enlightenment ideas. The country was struggling due to debt, famine, and inequality. The lower class, known as the third estate, was being taxed unfairly and felt they deserved equal say in the government. On July 14, 1789, a group of angry peasants looking for weapons began the French Revolution by Storming the Bastille, an old prison. The third estate went on to take over the government and made major changes to France. Their goal was to get rid of the old system of monarchy and nobles and establish democracy. Revolutionaries, under the leadership of Maximilien Robespierre, arrested and executed King Louis XVI and Queen Marie Antoinette. This began a time known as the Reign of Terror during which those who opposed the Revolution were executed with the guillotine. Over 15,000 people died during the Reign of Terror. While the Revolution did not achieve all of its goals of liberty and equality for all, it did succeed in encouraging secularism, nationalism and democracy. The Third Estate carrying the king, nobles and Catholic Church on its back Napoleon’s Rise and Fall Source: http://www.mrallsophistory.com/revision/the-origins-of-the-french-revolution.html The French people grew tired of the revolution’s violence.
    [Show full text]
  • Congress of Vienna Program Brochure
    We express our deep appreciation to the following sponsors: Carnegie Corporation of New York Isabella Ponta and Werner Ebm Ford Foundation City of Vienna Cultural Department Elbrun and Peter Kimmelman Family Foundation HOST COMMITTEE Chair, Marifé Hernández Co-Chairs, Gustav Ortner & Tassilo Metternich-Sandor Dr. & Mrs. Wolfgang Aulitzky Mrs. Isabella Ponta & Mr. Werner Ebm Mrs. Dorothea von Oswald-Flanigan Mrs. Elisabeth Gürtler Mr. & Mrs. Andreas Grossbauer Mr. & Mrs. Clemens Hellsberg Dr. Agnes Husslein The Honorable Andreas Mailath-Pokorny Mr. & Mrs. Manfred Matzka Mrs. Clarissa Metternich-Sandor Mr. Dominique Meyer DDr. & Mrs. Oliver Rathkolb Mrs. Isabelle Metternich-Sandor Ambassador & Mrs. Ferdinand Trauttmansdorff Mrs. Sunnyi Melles-Wittgenstein CONGRESS OF VIENNA 2015 | 2 Presented by the The CHUMIR FOUNDATION FOR ETHICS IN LEADERSHIP is a non-profit foundation that seeks to foster policies and actions by individuals, organizations and governments that best contribute to a fair, productive and harmonious society. The Foundation works to facilitate open-minded, informed and respectful dialogue among a broad and engaged public and its leaders to arrive at outcomes for a better community. www.chumirethicsfoundation.ca CONGRESS OF VIENNA 2015 | 2 CONGRESS OF VIENNA 2015 | 3 CONGRESS OF VIENNA 2015 | 4 UNDER THE DISTINGUISHED PATRONAGE OF H.E. Heinz Fischer, President of the Republic of Austria HONORARY CO-CHAIRS H.E. Josef Ostermayer Minister of Culture, Media and Constitution H.E. Sebastian Kurz Minister of Foreign Affairs and Integration CHAIR Joel Bell Chairman, Chumir Foundation for Ethics in Leadership CONGRESS SECRETARY Manfred Matzka Director General, Chancellery of Austria CHAIRMAN INTERNATIONAL ADVISORY COUNCIL Oliver Rathkolb HOST Chancellery of the Republic of Austria CONGRESS OF VIENNA 2015 | 4 CONGRESS OF VIENNA 2015 | 5 CONGRESS OF VIENNA 2015 | 6 It is a great honor for Austria and a special pleasure for me that we can host the Congress of Vienna 2015 in the Austrian Federal Chancellery.
    [Show full text]