Runs and Interventions in the Time of Covid-19: Evidence from Money Funds 50 Lei Li, Yi Li, Marco Macchiavelli and Xing (Alex) Zhou
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
COVID ECONOMICS VETTED AND REAL-TIME PAPERS ISSUE 29 16 JUNE 2020 POLICY COMMUNICATION Olivier Coibion, Yuriy Gorodnichenko and Michael Weber MONEY MARKET FUNDS Lei Li, Yi Li, Marco Macchiavelli CRIMINALITY AND LOCKDOWNS and Xing (Alex) Zhou Rubén Poblete-Cazenave FISCAL POLICY THE LABOUR MARKET Christian Bredemeier, Falko Juessen Jake Bradley, Alessandro Ruggieri and and Roland Winkler Adam H. Spencer Covid Economics Vetted and Real-Time Papers Covid Economics, Vetted and Real-Time Papers, from CEPR, brings together formal investigations on the economic issues emanating from the Covid outbreak, based on explicit theory and/or empirical evidence, to improve the knowledge base. Founder: Beatrice Weder di Mauro, President of CEPR Editor: Charles Wyplosz, Graduate Institute Geneva and CEPR Contact: Submissions should be made at https://portal.cepr.org/call-papers- covid-economics. Other queries should be sent to [email protected]. Copyright for the papers appearing in this issue of Covid Economics: Vetted and Real-Time Papers is held by the individual authors. The Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) The Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) is a network of over 1,500 research economists based mostly in European universities. The Centre’s goal is twofold: to promote world-class research, and to get the policy-relevant results into the hands of key decision-makers. CEPR’s guiding principle is ‘Research excellence with policy relevance’. A registered charity since it was founded in 1983, CEPR is independent of all public and private interest groups. It takes no institutional stand on economic policy matters and its core funding comes from its Institutional Members and sales of publications. Because it draws on such a large network of researchers, its output reflects a broad spectrum of individual viewpoints as well as perspectives drawn from civil society. CEPR research may include views on policy, but the Trustees of the Centre do not give prior review to its publications. The opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and not those of CEPR. Chair of the Board Sir Charlie Bean Founder and Honorary President Richard Portes President Beatrice Weder di Mauro Vice Presidents Maristella Botticini Ugo Panizza Philippe Martin Hélène Rey Chief Executive Officer Tessa Ogden Editorial Board Beatrice Weder di Mauro, CEPR Timothy J. Hatton, University of Essex Charles Wyplosz, Graduate Institute and CEPR Geneva and CEPR Ethan Ilzetzki, London School of Viral V. Acharya, Stern School of Economics and CEPR Business, NYU and CEPR Beata Javorcik, EBRD and CEPR Abi Adams-Prassl, University of Oxford Sebnem Kalemli-Ozcan, University of and CEPR Maryland and CEPR Rik Frehen Jérôme Adda, Bocconi University and Erik Lindqvist, Swedish Institute for CEPR Social Research (SOFI) Guido Alfani, Bocconi University and Tom Kompas, University of Melbourne CEPR and CEBRA Franklin Allen, Imperial College Business Miklós Koren, Central European School and CEPR University and CEPR Michele Belot, European University Anton Korinek, University of Virginia Institute and CEPR and CEPR David Bloom, Harvard T.H. Chan School Philippe Martin, Sciences Po and CEPR of Public Health Warwick McKibbin, ANU College of Nick Bloom, Stanford University and Asia and the Pacific CEPR Kevin Hjortshøj O’Rourke, NYU Abu Tito Boeri, Bocconi University and CEPR Dhabi and CEPR Alison Booth, University of Essex and Evi Pappa, European University Institute CEPR and CEPR Markus K Brunnermeier, Princeton Barbara Petrongolo, Queen Mary University and CEPR University, London, LSE and CEPR Michael C Burda, Humboldt Universitaet Richard Portes, London Business School zu Berlin and CEPR and CEPR Luis Cabral, New York University and Carol Propper, Imperial College London CEPR and CEPR Paola Conconi, ECARES, Universite Lucrezia Reichlin, London Business Libre de Bruxelles and CEPR School and CEPR Giancarlo Corsetti, University of Ricardo Reis, London School of Cambridge and CEPR Economics and CEPR Fiorella De Fiore, Bank for International Hélène Rey, London Business School and Settlements and CEPR CEPR Mathias Dewatripont, ECARES, Dominic Rohner, University of Lausanne Universite Libre de Bruxelles and CEPR and CEPR Jonathan Dingel, University of Chicago Paola Sapienza, Northwestern University Booth School and CEPR and CEPR Barry Eichengreen, University of Moritz Schularick, University of Bonn California, Berkeley and CEPR and CEPR Simon J Evenett, University of St Gallen Paul Seabright, Toulouse School of and CEPR Economics and CEPR Maryam Farboodi, MIT and CEPR Flavio Toxvaerd, University of Cambridge Antonio Fatás, INSEAD Singapore and Christoph Trebesch, Christian- CEPR Albrechts-Universitaet zu Kiel and CEPR Francesco Giavazzi, Bocconi University Karen-Helene Ulltveit-Moe, University and CEPR of Oslo and CEPR Christian Gollier, Toulouse School of Jan C. van Ours, Erasmus University Economics and CEPR Rotterdam and CEPR Rachel Griffith, IFS, University of Thierry Verdier, Paris School of Manchester and CEPR Economics and CEPR Ethics Covid Economics will feature high quality analyses of economic aspects of the health crisis. However, the pandemic also raises a number of complex ethical issues. Economists tend to think about trade-offs, in this case lives vs. costs, patient selection at a time of scarcity, and more. In the spirit of academic freedom, neither the Editors of Covid Economics nor CEPR take a stand on these issues and therefore do not bear any responsibility for views expressed in the articles. Submission to professional journals The following journals have indicated that they will accept submissions of papers featured in Covid Economics because they are working papers. Most expect revised versions. This list will be updated regularly. American Economic Review Journal of Econometrics* American Economic Review, Applied Journal of Economic Growth Economics Journal of Economic Theory American Economic Review, Insights Journal of the European Economic American Economic Review, Association* Economic Policy Journal of Finance American Economic Review, Journal of Financial Economics Macroeconomics Journal of International Economics American Economic Review, Journal of Labor Economics* Microeconomics Journal of Monetary Economics American Journal of Health Economics Journal of Public Economics Canadian Journal of Economics Journal of Political Economy Economic Journal Journal of Population Economics Economics of Disasters and Climate Quarterly Journal of Economics* Change Review of Economics and Statistics International Economic Review Review of Economic Studies* Journal of Development Economics Review of Financial Studies (*) Must be a significantly revised and extended version of the paper featured in Covid Economics. Covid Economics Vetted and Real-Time Papers Issue 29, 16 June 2020 Contents Does policy communication during COVID work? 1 Olivier Coibion, Yuriy Gorodnichenko and Michael Weber Runs and interventions in the time of Covid-19: Evidence from money funds 50 Lei Li, Yi Li, Marco Macchiavelli and Xing (Alex) Zhou Bringing back the jobs lost to Covid-19: The role of fiscal policy 99 Christian Bredemeier, Falko Juessen and Roland Winkler The Great Lockdown and criminal activity: Evidence from Bihar, India 141 Rubén Poblete-Cazenave Twin peaks: Covid-19 and the labor market 164 Jake Bradley, Alessandro Ruggieri and Adam H. Spencer 1 Covid Economics Issue 29, 16 June 2020 Does policy communication during COVID work?1 Olivier Coibion,2 Yuriy Gorodnichenko3 and Michael Weber4 Date submitted: 11 June 2020; Date accepted: 12 June 2020 Using a large-scale survey of U.S. households during the Covid-19 pandemic, we study how new information about fiscal and monetary policy responses to the crisis affects households’ expectations. We provide random subsets of participants in the Nielsen Homescan panel with different combinations of information about the severity of the pandemic, recent actions by the Federal Reserve, stimulus measures, as well as recommendations from health officials. This experiment allows us to assess to what extent these policy announcements alter the beliefs and spending plans of households. In short, they do not, contrary to the powerful effects they have in standard macroeconomic models. Covid Economics 29, 16 June 2020: 1-49 Covid Economics 1 We thank the National Science Foundation for financial support in conducting the surveys. We also thank Shannon Hazlett and Victoria Stevens at Nielsen for their assistance with the collection of the PanelViews Survey. Results in this article are calculated based on data from The Nielsen Company (US), LLC and marketing databases provided by the Kilts Center for Marketing Data Center at The University of Chicago Booth School of Business. Information on availability and access to the data is available at http://research.chicagobooth.edu/ nielsen. The randomized control trial is registered at the AER RCT Registry (#AEARCTR- 0005989). 2 Professor of Economics, UT Austin. 3 Professor of Economics, UC Berkeley. 4 Associate Professor of Finance, University of Chicago Booth School of Business. Copyright: Olivier Coibion, Yuriy Gorodnichenko and Michael Weber COVID ECONOMICS VETTED AND REAL-TIME PAPERS 2 “The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place.” – George Bernard Shaw. “[for monetary policy to be most effective] not only do expectations about policy matter, but, at least under current conditions, very little else matters." Woodford (2005) I. Introduction Monetary