Integrated Management of Environmental Resources
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Proceedings of the 3rd Edition of the International Conference Integrated Management of Environmental Resources Suceava, November 6‐7 th, 2015 Edited by: Sergiu‐Andrei Horodnic Mihai‐Leonard Duduman Ciprian Palaghianu 2016 ‐ Ştefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference Integrated Management of Environmental Resources ‐ Suceava, November 6‐7th, 2015 Editors: Sergiu‐Andrei Horodnic, Mihai‐Leonard Duduman, Ciprian Palaghianu The contributions to this volume have been peer‐reviewed. Reviewers: Ionel Popa ‐ “Marin Drăcea“ National Research‐Development Institute (ICAS) Marian Dragoi – “Ştefan cel Mare” University of Suceava Responsabilitatea integrală privind conţinutul lucrărilor prezentate revine autorilor. Responsibility for the content of these papers rests fully with their authors. Descrierea CIP a Bibliotecii Naţionale a României INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES. International Conference (2015; Suceava) Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference Integrated Management of Environmental Resources ‐ Suceava, November 6‐ 7th, 2015/ ed.: Sergiu‐Andrei Horodnic, Mihai‐Leonard Duduman, Ciprian Palaghianu ‐ Suceava : Editura Universităţii "Ştefan cel Mare", 2016 ISBN 978‐973‐666‐494‐6 I. Horodnic, Sergiu Andrei (ed.) II. Duduman, Mihai‐Leonard (ed.) III. Palaghianu, Ciprian (ed.) 630(498)(063) Table of contents Forest areas from Forestry Administration County Suceava that 3 contain certain values that are of critical conservation priority in the forest certification process Diana Vasile, Virgil Scărlătescu Evaluation of normality in the determination of spatio-temporal 15 autocorrelation of monthly precipitation in the central-west region of Venezuela Jesús Enrique Andrades-Grassi, Ledyz Cuesta-Herrera, Juan Ygnacio López-Hernádez, Arnaldo Goitía-Acosta Afforestation in Romania: Realities and Perspectives 24 Ciprian Palaghianu Evaluation of ecoprotective function intensity in stands with 32 coniferous growing outside their natural vegetation area. Case study in the Forest District Adâncata, P.U. VII Zvoriștea Cătălina Oana Barbu Analysis of wild boar population dynamics in Suceava County 38 for the period 2004-2016 Alexandru-Mihai Corjin, Nadia-Mihaela Dănilă, Gabriel Dănilă Considerations regarding the angular acceleration 45 influence on the vehicles movement in curves Dan Zarojanu Spatio-temporal association among monthly precipitation and 47 relief in the central-west region of Venezuela Jesús Enrique Andrades-Grassi, Hugo Alexander Torres- Mantilla, Juan Ygnacio López-Hernádez Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference Integrated Management of Environmental Resources, 2015 Forest areas from Forestry Administration County Suceava that contain certain values that are of critical conservation priority in the forest certification process Diana Vasilea, Virgil Scărlătescub National Institute of Forest Research and Development ”Marin Drăcea”- Brașov National Institute of Forest Research and Development ”Marin Drăcea”- Mihăești Corresponding author e-mail:[email protected] Abstract: Established on the FSC Principles and Criteria in 1999, the concept of High Conservation Value Forests (HCVF) has provided a useful new approach for defining and managing forest areas of critical conservation significance. This concept is flexible enough to be applied in a variety of contexts not only in the forest certification. As a result it has been applied in a range of settings, and has been used outside forest certification as well as within it. The FSC standard contains 10 conservation principles, related by several areas. Principle 9 (which is related of the HCVF identification) asks the forest manager to take a wider view, and to consider conservation issues as a high priority or significance on a national, regional or global scale. In the assessment process of HCVF from Forestry Administration County (FAC) Suceava, there was find an area of 18,543.63 ha with forest areas with high conservation values, which represent 8% of the total area with HCVF identified at national level. From this surface area, the highest percent is represented by forest areas from protected areas (31%), forests with critical seasonal use ( 23%) and of forests that are critical for erosion control (20% ). In all 24 forest districts (FD) were identified HCVF, the highest percent of the total area with HCVF from FAC Suceava, being in FD Crucea (16%), Dorna Cândreni and Stulpicani (12%). After the identification of the HCVF, there must be a decision making process that determines what form of management will be consistent with maintaining or enhancing of these values. It must be noted that the FSC standard does not require that an area of forest classified as HCVF becomes a protected area. In some cases, it may be possible to achieve commercial use of the forest while maintaining the value. Only forest areas from protected areas (National or natural parks, natural reserves, etc) will be completely protected. Keywords: assessment, criteria, conservation values, forest areas. 1. Introduction protection. Thus in Romania are13 national parks, 14 nature parks and 382 In the last years Romania has protected areas (Ioja et al., 2010). Most implemented the EU Birds and Habitat of Romania’s protected areas and all of Directive (NATURA 2000), therefore, national and nature parks are managed an important percent of the country’s by the National Forest Administration forests are under some form of (NFA) Romsilva (Abrudan et al., 2009). 3 Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference Integrated Management of Environmental Resources, 2015 Now, in the context of the Forestry - HCV4 - Critical ecosystem certification, the areas managed by services. Basic ecosystem services in National Forest Administration critical situations, including protection Romsilva, containing environmental of water catchments and control of and social values, such as unique erosion of vulnerable soils and slopes; biodiversity, watershed protection, soil - HCV5 - Community needs. stabilization or an archaeological site Sites and resources fundamental for will become High Conservation Value satisfying the basic necessities of local Forests (Jennings et al., 2003; Rouget communities (for livelihoods, health, et al., 2006; Schnooret al., 2010) . nutrition, water, etc.); The concept of High Conservation - HCV6 - Cultural values. Sites, Value (HCV) was used first in 1998, resources, habitats and landscapes of when the Forest Stewardship Council global or national cultural, (FSC) adopted it to define forest areas archaeological or historical of outstanding and critical importance significance, and/or of critical cultural, whose attributes should be maintained ecological, economic or or enhanced (FSC 1996; Jennings et religious/sacred importance for the al., 2003; Blackman et al., 2011; traditional cultures of local Brown et al., 2013; ). In this context, communities. High Conservation Value Forests The use of the HCVF concept is (HCVF) are evaluated by a process an important step towards better forest that identify them using a particular set management and protection and of values (Stewart et al., 2008; complements other tools for forest Tollefsonet al., 2008; FSC 2012; ): conservation such as forest - HCV1- Species diversity. certification and the designation of Concentrations of biological diversity protected areas (Van Kootenet al., including endemic species, and rare, 2004; Rietbergen-McCrackeret al., threatened orendangered species, that 2007;Kujiket al., 2009; McCormicket are significant at global, regional or al., 2009; Pena-Claros et al., 2009). national levels; This process can be considered as - HCV2- Landscape-level complementary to political planning ecosystems and mosaics. Large processes such as Natura 2000 and it is landscapelevel ecosystems and very useful for NFA Romsilva and for ecosystem mosaics that aresignificant private forest owners too, to manage at global, regional or national levels, forests to sustain and enhance the and contain viable populations of great environmental services. majority of the naturally occurring The aim of this article is to species in natural patterns of identify the HCVFs of the Forest distribution and abundance; Administration County Suceava to - HCV3 - Ecosystems and make a better forestry management habitats. Rare, threatened, or and to maintain and to enhance the endangered ecosystems, habitats or values of critical importance. refugia 4 Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference Integrated Management of Environmental Resources, 2015 2. Materials and methods continental - moderate climate (in the western side) with cool winters and The study was conducted in the fairly warm summers with Forestry Administration County (FAC) precipitation all year round. Suceava, on the range of 24 Forest For the HCVF identification was Districts (FD), managed of National used „The High Conservation Value Forest Administration Romsilva, Forests Toolkit” (Jennings et al. 2003), respectively: Adâncata, Breaza, based on a methodology that has 4 Brodina, Broșteni, Cârlibaba, Crucea, steps: Dolhasca, Dorna, Falcău, Fălticeni, - 1. Establish a team with forest Frasin, Gura Humor, Iacobeni, engineers, scientists, communities and Marginea, Mălini, Moldovița, Pătrăuți, NGOs at a regional level; Pojorâta, Putna, Râșca, Solca, - 2.The identification of the most Stulpicani, Vama and VatraDornei. important critical values from the Suceava County covers an area of forest and the place they are located; 8,553.5